The reason this bullshit was flagged down is because it represents junk science. This nonsense was debunked long time ago. Case closed. The amount of views should be representative of it's "truth". No one bothers with this crap because that's exactly what this video is. Junk science peddled by messenger boys working for grocery clerks.
"The reason this bullshit was flagged down is because it represents junk science." Reasonable people dont flag down stuff they disagree with. Apart from that, you are wrong. Did you do experiments with home-made thermite? Have you made thermite yourself from the ingredients? Have you lit thermite yourself and watch it burn? Have you calculated the energy the reaction gives off? For me, the answer to all of these questions is: YES. What is your answer?
also, this video is quite good at explaining scientific principles to a broader audience. your claim that it is "junk science" is based only on your own misconceptions, i think. What reasons do you have, that can be made sense of by others, that this vide contains or promotes "junk science"? I think this video exposes junk science.
@kurtilein3 You only get one chance to get this right. If you believe in the government's official "conspiracy" theory, then you would have no problem with NIST releasing all their reports and data used for the computer simulation of the "progressive collapse" for peer review because peer review would prove you right. Do you or do you not agree that NIST should submit it's reports and data for peer review?
Ok, the authors of the paper should have picked a more credible journal and followed publishing protocol. OK, the authors were bias and doctored a photo. Furthermore, they did not do experiments that conclusively demonstrated that the red chips found in the dust were not paint chips. Poor work on their part. My question is then who should do the research to reinvestigate just WTF the chips are and how they came to be in the 9/11 dust?
Truthers don't want us to see this cos they know it's a waste of time.
// It´s really no surprise to find rust and iron in the debris of a steel frame building. And for the aluminium or aluminium-oxide - remember what material the planes had been built with. //
And how common is nano scale rust?
100nm = 0.0000001m
10nm = 0.00000001m or 0.0001 mm
Evident in substantial quantities in all dust samples tested
DUST... yeah, well, why no solid concrete in the dust samples? Maybe because you just dont include rocks when taking dust samples.
nano scale rust is incredibly common when a steel building just went down. do i need to remind you of all the people that turned sick because they inhaled the concrete dust? at least nano scale rust is not as toxic as nano scale concrete.
i dont see what point you are even trying to make. nanoscale particles of a common material in dust, yeah.
I didn't get the name, the credentials nor bona fides of this disembodied "voice of God". You make a good case! But, generally, naysayers, critics, and argumentative academics, have a long, rich history of being dead wrong. Those who swallowed Bush's lies tend to be extreme authoritarian conservatives.
I smell more conservative politics!
BTW, the notion that Jesus taught in America, is part of Mormon teaching. You might find it tough slogging if you seek to invalidate Jones with that.
You are utterly wrong about thermite. Also, you ignore the agenda for full spectrum dominance, ignore the Revolution in Military Affairs, and ignore all the calls for a "New Pearl Harbor" in the 1990s. Your claims are rendered uttery false here (go to the Steven Jones/nano-thermite section): outlawjournalism com/forum/viewtopic php?t=5691
@Charlie666XZ thats because the purpose of the video is to debunk the thermite argument there is already enough video evidence and eye witness evidence that planes hit the buildings and that Al Qaeda was behind it...
What´s going on? I thought the so called truthers were enemies of censorship?
Well, I´m just kidding.
Flagging a critical video of this high quality that debunks the truther-mafia is exactly what I would expect from these people. They have no problem with censorship as long as the "right things" get censored.
i have a thermite theory...most structural steel is painted with zinc oxide primer....i was wondering if the steel super sturcture had been painted with aluminum paint or if aluminum paint had been used in parts of the building ...ive painted galvinized and primed metal with aluminum paint on more than one occasion...not to make thermite but as a rust prohibitor on metal to stop rust...is it possible that this was done during some maintence procedure?
well, why dont the truthers answer that question? we are talking about a mixture of aluminium powder and powdered rust, that some pseudo-scientists claim to have found in the debris of a HUGE building that just burned and collapsed. maybe someone just had a can of aluminium powder in his office. maybe the people writing this up got it wrong. we will never know. maybe some paint burned and left behind aluminium powder, ive seen it happen. and rust... cmon, when steel burns...
It´s really no surprise to find rust and iron in the debris of a steel frame building. And for the aluminium or aluminium-oxide - remember what material the planes had been built with.
Now some troofers should come around the corner and tell us: "There was no plane, it was a cruise missile!"
I mean, honestly: Almost 10 years and the 911 conspiracy people offered nothing but shit and tremendous stupidity. It is all debunked multiple times. These people actually DON´T WANT to know.
lets not forget that this group self-selected for stupidity twice. after 9/11, when the movement was growing, the more gullible and more easily convinced people joined. skeptics didnt buy it, scientists didnt buy it, some architects and engineers and large parts of the uneducated masses did.
now the movement has been shrinking, this time the most educated and most intelligent and most critically thinking leave first. whats left now has been selected for stupidity twice.
@kurtilein3 The fact that skeptics abandon ship means nothing. Bush/Cheney had many motives and as much as spelled out a confession on the PNAC website; long since discreetly removed. PNAC said that America can and would do anything for any reason. If that involved invading small countries for profit. No problemo!
You attack Jones integrity for publishing in discredited journals without asking if his options might be few, due to Bush's political intervention, hence editorial bias.
@kurtilein3 your the type that was telling people gulf of tonkin is real, ur that type of sheep. you just believe your government, they care for you, they love you.
@kurtilein3 No we are talking about nano particles thats can only be manufactured a a very select few labs in the entire world. I quantifiable quantities that are absurd. You throw out sound bits and catch words like pseudo science like it gives you any credibility. while at the same time ignoring solid evidence which you can't refute.
This video proves nothing at all. It has nothing BUT conjecture and opinion. None, Not even one sound bit that is scientific in nature. So where is the evidence?
also, i have to point out that its just stupid to attempt to use the presence of a "poor demolition substance" to support the idea that it was a controlled demolition. (actually its just NOT AN EXPLOSIVE, it doesnt explode, and thats the problem here). what do they want to accomplish with asking their question? they dont even know themselves, so lets just laugh about it, then they will either come up with something that makes sense or we will just keep laughing.
@666norton420 its easy to answer this aluminum came from the plane and iron from the building, employ occam's razor (the simplest answer is usually the right one)...there were no explosives...
@666norton420 I most strongly recommend that you read the NIST report of Nov 08 about the "collapse" of WTC7 and then make up your own mind, special note, check out the graph on page 46 and ponder what uniform acceleration means.
also note the VERNON link and the offer of $5K to anyone who can support the physics of the NIST "explanation" .... enjoy....
The reason this bullshit was flagged down is because it represents junk science. This nonsense was debunked long time ago. Case closed. The amount of views should be representative of it's "truth". No one bothers with this crap because that's exactly what this video is. Junk science peddled by messenger boys working for grocery clerks.
Daddyo930 8 months ago
@Daddyo930
"The reason this bullshit was flagged down is because it represents junk science." Reasonable people dont flag down stuff they disagree with. Apart from that, you are wrong. Did you do experiments with home-made thermite? Have you made thermite yourself from the ingredients? Have you lit thermite yourself and watch it burn? Have you calculated the energy the reaction gives off? For me, the answer to all of these questions is: YES. What is your answer?
kurtilein3 7 months ago
@Daddyo930
also, this video is quite good at explaining scientific principles to a broader audience. your claim that it is "junk science" is based only on your own misconceptions, i think. What reasons do you have, that can be made sense of by others, that this vide contains or promotes "junk science"? I think this video exposes junk science.
kurtilein3 7 months ago
@kurtilein3 You only get one chance to get this right. If you believe in the government's official "conspiracy" theory, then you would have no problem with NIST releasing all their reports and data used for the computer simulation of the "progressive collapse" for peer review because peer review would prove you right. Do you or do you not agree that NIST should submit it's reports and data for peer review?
Daddyo930 7 months ago
Ok, the authors of the paper should have picked a more credible journal and followed publishing protocol. OK, the authors were bias and doctored a photo. Furthermore, they did not do experiments that conclusively demonstrated that the red chips found in the dust were not paint chips. Poor work on their part. My question is then who should do the research to reinvestigate just WTF the chips are and how they came to be in the 9/11 dust?
lizardfirefighter110 1 year ago
Truthers don't want us to see this cos they know it's a waste of time.
// It´s really no surprise to find rust and iron in the debris of a steel frame building. And for the aluminium or aluminium-oxide - remember what material the planes had been built with. //
And how common is nano scale rust?
100nm = 0.0000001m
10nm = 0.00000001m or 0.0001 mm
Evident in substantial quantities in all dust samples tested
DUST mind you. Why no solid concrete?
Concrete turned to DUST?
alimort1 1 year ago
@alimort1
DUST... yeah, well, why no solid concrete in the dust samples? Maybe because you just dont include rocks when taking dust samples.
nano scale rust is incredibly common when a steel building just went down. do i need to remind you of all the people that turned sick because they inhaled the concrete dust? at least nano scale rust is not as toxic as nano scale concrete.
i dont see what point you are even trying to make. nanoscale particles of a common material in dust, yeah.
kurtilein3 1 year ago
I didn't get the name, the credentials nor bona fides of this disembodied "voice of God". You make a good case! But, generally, naysayers, critics, and argumentative academics, have a long, rich history of being dead wrong. Those who swallowed Bush's lies tend to be extreme authoritarian conservatives.
I smell more conservative politics!
BTW, the notion that Jesus taught in America, is part of Mormon teaching. You might find it tough slogging if you seek to invalidate Jones with that.
BillSalem 1 year ago
Comment removed
BillSalem 1 year ago
Pseudo-scientists?
Wait a minute, the paper of Steven Jones is after all peer-reviewed. Don't forget that.
MrKoenig1985 1 year ago 30
You are utterly wrong about thermite. Also, you ignore the agenda for full spectrum dominance, ignore the Revolution in Military Affairs, and ignore all the calls for a "New Pearl Harbor" in the 1990s. Your claims are rendered uttery false here (go to the Steven Jones/nano-thermite section): outlawjournalism com/forum/viewtopic php?t=5691
Blissentia 1 year ago
"Bin Laden Yes I Did It" article: w w w .telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/afghanistan/1362113/Bin-Laden-Yes-I-did-it.html
keiichicom 1 year ago
This Video does a good bit of "shoot the messenger"
but does NOTHING to prove that 19 radical Arabs
hijacked 4 airliners and crashed 3 of them into buildings
causing the COMPLETE DESTRUCTION of not only the 2 towers that where "HIT"
but also WTC7 that was NOT hit by an aircraft and displays ALL of the key characteristics of Controlled Demolition... What is going on around here?
Charlie666XZ 1 year ago
@Charlie666XZ thats because the purpose of the video is to debunk the thermite argument there is already enough video evidence and eye witness evidence that planes hit the buildings and that Al Qaeda was behind it...
keiichicom 1 year ago
@keiichicom anybody want an easy $5K?
vernon911truth[DOT]org/wtc7contest.html
enjoy.....
Charlie666XZ 1 year ago
What´s going on? I thought the so called truthers were enemies of censorship?
Well, I´m just kidding.
Flagging a critical video of this high quality that debunks the truther-mafia is exactly what I would expect from these people. They have no problem with censorship as long as the "right things" get censored.
enkidu23 1 year ago
i have a thermite theory...most structural steel is painted with zinc oxide primer....i was wondering if the steel super sturcture had been painted with aluminum paint or if aluminum paint had been used in parts of the building ...ive painted galvinized and primed metal with aluminum paint on more than one occasion...not to make thermite but as a rust prohibitor on metal to stop rust...is it possible that this was done during some maintence procedure?
centervilletn 1 year ago
so, why was the thermite there?
this is a good example of why i'm on the fence about this shit.....
the academic side dismisses certain motivations, the "truther" side raise odd questions.
thermite would be a poor demolition substance.... but why would it be there at all?
;d
666norton420 1 year ago
@666norton420
well, why dont the truthers answer that question? we are talking about a mixture of aluminium powder and powdered rust, that some pseudo-scientists claim to have found in the debris of a HUGE building that just burned and collapsed. maybe someone just had a can of aluminium powder in his office. maybe the people writing this up got it wrong. we will never know. maybe some paint burned and left behind aluminium powder, ive seen it happen. and rust... cmon, when steel burns...
kurtilein3 1 year ago
@kurtilein3
It´s really no surprise to find rust and iron in the debris of a steel frame building. And for the aluminium or aluminium-oxide - remember what material the planes had been built with.
Now some troofers should come around the corner and tell us: "There was no plane, it was a cruise missile!"
I mean, honestly: Almost 10 years and the 911 conspiracy people offered nothing but shit and tremendous stupidity. It is all debunked multiple times. These people actually DON´T WANT to know.
enkidu23 1 year ago
@enkidu23
lets not forget that this group self-selected for stupidity twice. after 9/11, when the movement was growing, the more gullible and more easily convinced people joined. skeptics didnt buy it, scientists didnt buy it, some architects and engineers and large parts of the uneducated masses did.
now the movement has been shrinking, this time the most educated and most intelligent and most critically thinking leave first. whats left now has been selected for stupidity twice.
kurtilein3 1 year ago
@kurtilein3 The fact that skeptics abandon ship means nothing. Bush/Cheney had many motives and as much as spelled out a confession on the PNAC website; long since discreetly removed. PNAC said that America can and would do anything for any reason. If that involved invading small countries for profit. No problemo!
You attack Jones integrity for publishing in discredited journals without asking if his options might be few, due to Bush's political intervention, hence editorial bias.
BillSalem 1 year ago 30
@kurtilein3 your the type that was telling people gulf of tonkin is real, ur that type of sheep. you just believe your government, they care for you, they love you.
jumppack1 1 year ago
@kurtilein3 bah, you wanna talk about stupid kurt, please explain to me the pancake theory and how it actually works. sounds utterly stupid to me.
that's it, explain the constant and even collapsing of each floor.
good luck.
;d
666norton420 1 year ago
@kurtilein3 No we are talking about nano particles thats can only be manufactured a a very select few labs in the entire world. I quantifiable quantities that are absurd. You throw out sound bits and catch words like pseudo science like it gives you any credibility. while at the same time ignoring solid evidence which you can't refute.
This video proves nothing at all. It has nothing BUT conjecture and opinion. None, Not even one sound bit that is scientific in nature. So where is the evidence?
marquedesade 1 year ago
@666norton420
also, i have to point out that its just stupid to attempt to use the presence of a "poor demolition substance" to support the idea that it was a controlled demolition. (actually its just NOT AN EXPLOSIVE, it doesnt explode, and thats the problem here). what do they want to accomplish with asking their question? they dont even know themselves, so lets just laugh about it, then they will either come up with something that makes sense or we will just keep laughing.
kurtilein3 1 year ago
@666norton420 its easy to answer this aluminum came from the plane and iron from the building, employ occam's razor (the simplest answer is usually the right one)...there were no explosives...
keiichicom 1 year ago
@666norton420 I most strongly recommend that you read the NIST report of Nov 08 about the "collapse" of WTC7 and then make up your own mind, special note, check out the graph on page 46 and ponder what uniform acceleration means.
also note the VERNON link and the offer of $5K to anyone who can support the physics of the NIST "explanation" .... enjoy....
Charlie666XZ 1 year ago
we all know it was a setup... but nothing will ever be done
ooosteve 1 year ago
Intriguing. Thanks Kurt.
Kargoneth 1 year ago