Added: 2 years ago
From: Praenestinus
Views: 9,552
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (9)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Well, I'm sorry to say (because I'd like to like everything that's done with such obvious preparation) that this is not sung in the style it needs -- and not because there is a rigidly "right" way to sing renaissance liturgical music, as some would maintain, but because the acoustics are just too live for the large romantic vocal production.

  • This is a very operatic performance. Check out the fine English choral versions for more spiritual and authentic perpectives. This is Palestrina after all, not

    Rossini.

  • @michaels7 ..But Pierluigi is not english

  • @Praenestinus Palestrina is not english but he wrote and conducted this music for a boy's choir. Italy has lost this tradition of choral music and in the 18th and 19th centuries and has embraced opera. I think it is important that Palestrina be performed in the mode he wrote, for a boy's choir. This version sounds like a bunch of want to bees opera stars. Hardly appropriate for the music.

  • grande Simone!

  • Caspita! Dovevo esserci anche io li in mezzo a cantare questa messa stupenda ma il fato non mi ha permesso di prendervi parte... dico solo BRAVISSIMO al M. Baiocchi e BRAVISSIMI a tutti/e i/le coristi/e

    Saluti da RIccione

  • Ezio è un'istituzione!

  • ...certo con un cantore che è un pezzo di storia della cappella pontificia non poteva che venire bene, grande Ezio!!!

  • im surprised they let you do anything traditional...

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more