Hybrid Jeep Wrangler

[crusty529]

what did you do to your O2 sensor ?

[Dominic078]

You think A old school jeep is a good first car? like a 94. I Just want a chillen summer car that I can go to desert parties in haha

[Video19255]

Way to go, keep the good work up...

[IAMDAVEAMI]

oi

why waste good cells on a gay jeep

haha better off on a smaller car then you will get like 56 miles per GALLON!!!

thats like way more EPIC haha then a gay jeep haha

the end

:P

[greganthonyb]

Great Job...YES it works, and YES I get people that don't believe me either! I even take people for a ride of 100 miles and let THEM fill up the tank of less than 3 gallons!

[mjgab12]

seriously go get an education and learn about legitimate technology. this is snake oil

[theaton1]

@mjgab12 truly, I like the comparison to snake oil...Anyway, putting your hours of research aside I would have to disagree with you about the snake oil.  Seeming how snake oil is extracted from the chinese water snake I would have to assume you're referring to the medical term meaning that it's a medicine claiming to have a cure without any scientific tests. I assure you this is not a medicine, actually I have no idea what would happen if someone were to ingest the liquid. I wouldn't recommend

[actyankeefan]

Only a fool would think this is legitimate.

[DZLDamon]

Check you facts man... if you were getting 75-8 efficiency then you would be getting more like 65-75mpg. A normal Otto Cycle engine yields only 20-25% thermal efficiency.

And energy can neither be created nor destroyed (ask Mr. Newton if you disagree), only transformed. And it takes energy (electricity from your altenator) to break the hydrogen/oxygen bonds. That's not free.

I have a simple solution: swap a 4bt cummins turbo diesel in there and watch yourself get 30+mpg with 20 year old tech.

[theaton1]

@DZLDamon I'm sure a basic math class wouldn't do you any harm, although I would suggest maybe a pre-basic math class. Do a little homework also before you go spouting off at the pie hole. I've read some of your posts and you seem to be nothing more than a troll with a mouth. As I stated earlier a combustion engine usually has an 80% efficiency output. Increase the efficiency and naturally you can increase the mileage WITH or WITHOUT hydrogen. I use because I've proven it works.

[DZLDamon]

@theaton1 I'm a mechanical engineer. I'll teach you a thing or 2 about thermodynamic sonny, seeing as you obviously tried to learn your "knowledge" on wikipedia or something. I see you are the original posters son or father or whatever, so I understand you feel you must stick up for him. Maybe you should check you facts before you open your pie hole:

You find an otto cycle engine (gasoline engine to a laymen such as yourself) with 80% efficiency in any vehicle, and I'll find you Jimmy Hoffa.

[theaton1]

@DZLDamonTo tell you the truth, I don't feel the need to stick up for anyone. I highly doubt you're a mechanical engineer otherwise you would have actually tried this out for yourself. You see, I don't condemn ideas until I prove or disporve them for myself. I made a device based on hundreds of ideas and guess what? It worked for me. Am I trying to seel you something? Nope. So what are you saying? That because of thermodynamics this is impossible? I learn by doing, trial and error. Maybe you can

[DZLDamon]

@theaton1 I'm tired of this battle of wits with an unarmed opponent. Just remember when you post online, a lot smarter people that you can easily watch and call bull. You got many neg. comments, and a few nods towards you obvious lack of knowledge for Thermodynamics you obtained most likely from Wikipedia (citation needed). Your "proof" is merely a CLAIM that's broadcast ed by Craig Colsen on a slow news day.

And my buddy gets 21mpg with his 4.0L Wrangler all the time? What's the big deal?

[theaton1]

@DZLDamon I'm already tired of this conversation, truthfully I don't see how anyone could talk to you for more than 5 minutes at a time. As I stated in posts before, I couldn't care less if you believe it or not. For me? It works. Otherwise I wouldn't waste my time with it. Obviously I do know a thing or two about thermodynamics and if you really knew the meaning of the word you'd drop it. Yes, it creates heat. No, it's not a problem. It still works. Wikipedia, lol. I guess you use it a lot?

[greganthonyb]

GREAT Job kteaton! I am getting 33mpg with my 258 I6. I've been running my Jeep CJ-5 using this set up for almost 2 years now! My Bronco is next...

[Robinson4643]

a kit to do this would be sweet

[trickeepat]

Does not work. Your an idiot i you believe it too.

[coddlinghimmler]

the fuck it doesn't work try it. You need stainless steel pvc pipe caps for either end and some wire to a battery, Baking soda and water. You can literally light the bubbles it produces on fire for a magnificent "POP". It also makes your engine run cooler which means less wear and tear.

[sam3k]

this is impressive. i've been wanting to find out how to achieve this with my Jeep Wrangler.

How much did it cost to produce and are there any tutorials, step-by-steps, etc ?

[Vedicstar]

This concept violates the laws of thermal-dynamics. There is not one reputable scientist of mechanic that has endorsed this idea. There has been zero studies by anyone which has survived the scientific testing process. Most articles about this include a link to buy a similar device. You will have better luck in promoting bio-gasoline or bio-diesel.

[badtripsrbad]

i have the same jeep...a tj. what all did he need to do this?

[fortythreewins]

can't find his site..... has he taken it down?

[shitbag139]

what sucks is that if he had stepped up his tire size to a 30.5 or 31 and done some mods, he could get up to 24 mpg anyways,lol. so imagine if he did that and added hydrogen??with cold air,lucas oil,firepower ignition,pacdestter header,higflow cat,highflow muff, and properly stepped down to 2and a eight or 2 inch in rear, try that folks, you'll be dr gasmileage ans smoke mustangs all day long

[jerkoff666]

what are you talking about? increasing tire size decreases gas mileage. trust me. i have a '00 wrangler and by going from 30" to 31" inch tires, i lost about 30 miles off of a tank of gas. when i stepped up to 33" tires, i lost another 45 or so. and i have a high flow intake and exhaust. wranglers bone stock only get about 20mpg max. once you mod it, you lose. i'm at about 13-15mpg now with the added weight of armor and bumpers. the 4.0 just doesn't net good mileage. the 4 cyl. is just as bad.

[shm4275]

i have a 2004 wrangler and would love to do this to mine ... any help there buddy???

[wilonpill]

If this works so well and so cheaply why isn't it being used by every fleet of vehicles in the country?

[theaton1]

to be perfectly honest with you the only reason these cells aren't used on every fleet in the country is because a lot of people think it doesn't work. Personally, I don't really care if those people spend their entire life savings on fuel because they're too lazy to go out and find out for themselves. I'm saving money on fuel and that's all there is to it. I post what I find, I look for better ways to do things and if people believe me enough to try it for themselves then congrats to them.

[trickeepat]

Ha ha ha ha

[Jakemd98]

NOPE!! the jeep 4.0 is an in-line 6. Look at the vid around 46 seconds... there is 1 valve cover. SO.... who's the dip shit now?

[theaton1]

the jeep is an inline 6, it runs now on 5 cells. my other jeep is a v8 350 chevy engine and has 2 cells connected. The engines with absolutely no computer on board works perfect with HHO cells.

[trickeepat]

hahahaha

[LoganClark12]

yea it is dip shit

[pokerstud2523]

reply to Logan

The 4.0 is not a V6, in my jeep anyway and I belive in most wranglers is a straight 6

[Jakemd98]

the 4.0 is not a V6...

[theaton1]

hey mooktank, how about we explain the "lets forget about thermodynamics" Something a little more intelligible?

[mooktank]

Let's forget about thermodynamics!