John A Hobson takes down the Austrian "malinvestment due to inflation" theory of depressions, showing how underconsumption and net interest drain from loan money is the true cause. Check the validity of his refutation of malinvestment here: 4E79k-g63Xo (paste to YouTube search engine) other links on related analysis in "show more" section
3) Vaughn is correct: the Austrians’ trade cycle theory is flawed by failing to take into account Keynesian uncertainty, subjective expectations and a severe failure to deal with the instabilities caused by asset bubbles and debt deflation that is the cause to recent crises.The tools to grasp the cause and forecast recent crise is simply not in Austrian Kit-Bag.
2)"Certainly,we have the empirical evidence of speculative bubbles that are endogenous to markets.One would think that the extent and potential limiting factors that affect such endogenous instabilities would be of great importance for fully understanding market orders, yet it is an issue surprisingly missing in the Austrian literature.”(Vaughn: 87–88)
1)Karen Vaughn’s Austrian Economics in America.Cambridge,1994
“Mises never discusses the possibility of systematic speculative error except in the context of his trade cycle theory,in which speculators-investors are misled by improper monetary signals emanating from a fractional reserve banking...,if the future is created out of the actions of the past,why is it not least conceivably possible for speculative activity to be on net incorrect at least some of the time?" Vaughn:87–88)
Sounds effect are rather loud and annoying and the sound quality is not great but the global presentation is a masterstroke at keynesian fallacies. Thanks for publishing it.
Ive said it a couple of times but Mises needs to get another mike for the audience so we can hear it. Or the speaker should repeat the question to let the speakers mike pick it up.
After having viewed it with more attention, I feel compelled to say that Mr. (doctor, professor?) Garrison has done a truly excellent (I repeat: excellent) job on explaining the ABCT in a concise and comprehensive manner. The powerpoint presentation is available online if you google it (as is just about any libertarian educational work) and with removal of the noises I will be sure to bring it up in discussions with non-economists to explain these concepts better than I used to do before this.
After listening to Peter Schiff, Tom Woods, Bob Murphy, and Marc Faber all other Austrian economists are dull and boring. Nice to know a handful of college professors teach and believe Mises over Keynes across the country.
Really nice talk, but the sounds are a tad annoying after a while so I suggest leaving them out after the first slide or something :) Still, very nice talk, of course.
Geithner disliked this
fritoman182 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
John A Hobson takes down the Austrian "malinvestment due to inflation" theory of depressions, showing how underconsumption and net interest drain from loan money is the true cause. Check the validity of his refutation of malinvestment here: 4E79k-g63Xo (paste to YouTube search engine) other links on related analysis in "show more" section
oldickeastman 2 months ago
What fucking sound effects? <_<"
Audiofalcon7 5 months ago
Am I the only one who thinks the sound effects are awesome?
evilsceptic 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
3) Vaughn is correct: the Austrians’ trade cycle theory is flawed by failing to take into account Keynesian uncertainty, subjective expectations and a severe failure to deal with the instabilities caused by asset bubbles and debt deflation that is the cause to recent crises.The tools to grasp the cause and forecast recent crise is simply not in Austrian Kit-Bag.
zsylvana 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
2)"Certainly,we have the empirical evidence of speculative bubbles that are endogenous to markets.One would think that the extent and potential limiting factors that affect such endogenous instabilities would be of great importance for fully understanding market orders, yet it is an issue surprisingly missing in the Austrian literature.”(Vaughn: 87–88)
zsylvana 7 months ago
1)Karen Vaughn’s Austrian Economics in America.Cambridge,1994
“Mises never discusses the possibility of systematic speculative error except in the context of his trade cycle theory,in which speculators-investors are misled by improper monetary signals emanating from a fractional reserve banking...,if the future is created out of the actions of the past,why is it not least conceivably possible for speculative activity to be on net incorrect at least some of the time?" Vaughn:87–88)
zsylvana 7 months ago
It just. Makes. Sense.
tvincentchase 9 months ago 4
Sounds effect are rather loud and annoying and the sound quality is not great but the global presentation is a masterstroke at keynesian fallacies. Thanks for publishing it.
BadMunckY 11 months ago
How the hell does anyone take Keynesianism seriously?
twk373 11 months ago 6
good preso sound effects gotta go. They are even worse on headphones.
lilbromarky1 1 year ago 4
Comment removed
ExternalServerError 1 year ago
Mises.org sent me here.
djussila 1 year ago
"If only Hayek had PowerPoint, he could have shown how the abstract triangle aligns with the real-world output."
But the question is, would he use those annoying sound effects?
prashantpawar 1 year ago
what sound effects? i'm 7 minutes in, and I don't hear anything.
sadkins1 1 year ago
Wow Really good, thank you. Excellent!
LibertyJedi 1 year ago
Ive said it a couple of times but Mises needs to get another mike for the audience so we can hear it. Or the speaker should repeat the question to let the speakers mike pick it up.
NicosMind 1 year ago
Dear God get rid of the sound effects.
imtc88 1 year ago 16
@imtc88 They aren't even sound effects, just glorified white noise!
richardcadbury 1 year ago
You might not like the sounds but can you honestly say you wouldn't have done the same thing in his situation?
Just for the sake of comedic value and obnoxiousness.
AarontheCurious 1 year ago
@AarontheCurious Sounds are good, but volume should be controlled. They should be subtle, not dominant.
Panpiper 1 year ago
The visual representation really makes the point clear. (I wouldn't miss the sounds though ;)
Zander242 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
END THE FED
the truth
LibertyPoet
website
campaign4liberty 1 year ago
After having viewed it with more attention, I feel compelled to say that Mr. (doctor, professor?) Garrison has done a truly excellent (I repeat: excellent) job on explaining the ABCT in a concise and comprehensive manner. The powerpoint presentation is available online if you google it (as is just about any libertarian educational work) and with removal of the noises I will be sure to bring it up in discussions with non-economists to explain these concepts better than I used to do before this.
NietzscheanMan 1 year ago
After listening to Peter Schiff, Tom Woods, Bob Murphy, and Marc Faber all other Austrian economists are dull and boring. Nice to know a handful of college professors teach and believe Mises over Keynes across the country.
residentzombie 1 year ago
Really nice talk, but the sounds are a tad annoying after a while so I suggest leaving them out after the first slide or something :) Still, very nice talk, of course.
NietzscheanMan 1 year ago
@NietzscheanMan
You are quite right, Mr Garrison should ditch the silly noises and get Mr Hat back on the scene!
gibbo675 1 year ago
Holy moly! An Austrian not wearing a bowtie!
reapfreak 1 year ago 18