they chop down trees, carbon is not a problem unless it turns into carbon monoxide, cars, stoves, coal, etc... this world works on balance and it is not
I wonder about the four ice ages. How could there be two miles of ice above me, here in Minnesota, four times building up and four times melting, when there were no humans here at all? The climate has never been stable and never will be. Change is the norm, day night, winter summer, ice age, warming age. It takes cycles to sustain life.
Higher CO2 lags global warming. The scientific community knows this - including the IPCC - but this fact doesn't suit the desire to manipulate global economies. Some lie for money. Some lie for power.
Thousands of scientists live of of grants to study global warming. if they admit we don't affect it: they will have to write new grant requests and find new fields to work in in many cases. many are also directly on the progressive agenda's take and will lie to the end! the forests of the earth give off more CO2 than humans could ever dream of doing! so lets chop down the forrests! elephants fart alot too. kill all the elephants, or at least inject them with gasX or beano!
Time to stop trying to save the planet (it has been here for billions of years it will be here when were long gone) and save oursleves. There are diseases, comets, and wars that will wipe us out, not global warming. As this video states (with hard evidence) during the Medieval Age the temp. was 5 degrees warmer than it is today, and we were FINE! Stop believing political propaganda and think for yourself.
@StormTrooper330 You're uneducated and that's why simple lies fool you. You should fuck off away from the internet as you just bore the fuck out of everyone with your predictable ignorant fear.
@nilbud Ummm ok. Obviously you did not grasp the ideal of my statement. I was saying do not believe the lies. And sense you can't even make a logical, rational "response" you are indeed the uneducated one. I await for your predictable ARROGANT response, you peon.
So, the policy makers go back to the scientists and ask them whether they could "sex up" their documents. Is Tony Blair involved in this some way? (He has to go before the Iraq war inquiry next Friday, so he won't have time to read this...ha ha ha!)
The fact that the Sun has had virtually no sunspots for the past two years and that the Earth, according to the satelite data and Argos data show the Earth has cooled down dramatically in the past 18 months. This is proof positive the Sun is by far the major driver of our climate and completely dwarfs the imagined affects of man made global warming due to CO2emissions.
In Al Gore's AIT the graphics are slick, the video theatrical and his claim that CO2 concentrations drive temperature are false. In fact the relationship is the other way around - Higher concentrations of CO2 lag the temperature change. Gore has it wrong. The IPCC has it wrong!... and the Kyoto Protocol has it wrong. The EPA is outside the science when it advocates a finding for CO2 as a pollutant. Without this compound planet earth would be a very lifeless place.
This video gives a false picture. The majority of scientists studying climate change believe that the sudden global warming in the last 50 years were caused by C02 emissions. Of course there should be room for scientific discussion, but this video is misleading.
Just pointing out that we should not label something false or incorrect because the entire world wants us to believe CO2 is the true and only problem.
But.... if you really want me to pick a side... it won't be a happy one.
I think the real issue is here what it should have been decades ago: Are we going to go nuclear? Nuclear energy is worth adding to the collective alternative energies right now and stop, they should have emphasized that above the cap and trade. I have been arguing on the side of nuclear for economics', and for climate changes' sake for some time, hopefully the crisis may help with opinion of this source (nuclear) as an option.
An interesting article from the July edition of the BBC Focus Magazine. It says astronomers say the Sun is the 'quietest' it has been for almost 100 years. There is also a 50-year low in the solar wind pressure. It has been going through a cooling down period for the last 20 years and yet overall global temperatures are still rising. So increased sun activity cannot be blamed for the rise in Earth's temperatures.
Richard482: You misunderstand the way the sun works. When the sun is active, the strong solar magnetic field reduces the amount of cosmic radiation (muons) reaching the earth. When it is quiet, as now, cosmic radiation is increased.
Water vapour condenses around muons to form clouds. The more clouds, the less heat reaches earth from the sun. This is reflected in the observed temperature record for the last decade. The mean solar cycle is 11 years (actually 10.7), not 20 years.
the problem you have here, is that the average temp is going down. co2 makes up 4% of greenhouse gas, and manmade co2 is a small percentage of that. 95% of greenhouse gas is water vapor. should we drain the oceans?
Also, they seem to think the IPCC is being forced to make warming work worse. However, it is the other way around. Oil companies and others pay scientists to give information against human caused warming. Today's warming is beyond a reasonable doubt caused by human CO2. Also, their argument that temp changes come before Co2 is BS. We don't know everything about warming, but we DO know that human CO2 IS CAUSING IT AND THAT GLOBAL WARMING HAS HUGE AND PREVENTABLE CONSEQUENCES.
@thetotalvidwatcher Oil companies have spent more and contributed more money to the coffers of PRO CO2-caused organizations like Greenpeace and the WWF than anyone else.
CO2 does not drive climate. It is the byproduct of higher temperatures, which is caused by the SUN. Warmer temps + more CO2 = more plant growth and flourishing, which in turn causes mammals to thrive more as well. It is a win-win for all around. If CO2 is such a worry for you, why not kill yourself? Bye carbon footprint!
The Unstoppable solar cycles video is propaganda, the equivilent of political smear tactics. There is only one experienced environental scientist on the show (David Legates) the other looks more like an amueture. The fact is these people are holding up progress to cut CO2 emmisions. This video deserves a spot on everybody's "Wall of Shame" if you will. They present little solid evidence. Co2/human caused warming is proven beyond a reasonable doubt
thetotalvidwatcher: Take the total world anthropogenic greenhous gas emissions, and divide by the total world population. This calculates an average carbon footprint. Now, given that the world population doubles every 70 years or so, we would need to halve the average carbon footprint every 70 years, for ever, just to maintain the status quo.
Whether global warming is "proven" or not, just reducing emissions can not be a long-term answer. It is a distraction from real investigative science.
Without CO2 the planet dies. CO2 in the 1960s was among the lowest in the history of the planet. The best climate the planet ever had, was with 4000ppm of CO2, or more than 10x current level.
Even if the government are idiots and think global warming is the problem, it does not matter because they are at least concerned about the environment on earth. There is no doubt that raping the oil on the earth destroys lakes, rivers, etc and causes cancer in communities downstream of oil diggers. There is also no doubt about the exhaust fumes causing problems similar to how tobacco smoke going into lungs causes problems. The problem is down here on earth, not up in the sun!
No they are not concerned. If they were, they would be removing pollutants that actually are harmful to life, and they also wouldn't be allowing your local air to become fouled. What they are doing is instituting a farce in order to collect new taxes that will be placed on anything made from oil, or trees, or releases carbon dioxide, which we exhale, in some way or another.
It is called theft, but they con people into believing they are helping by paying the carbon dioxide tax.
"No they are not concerned. If they were, they would be removing pollutants that actually are harmful to life, and they also wouldn't be allowing your local air to become fouled."
Allowing your local air to become fouled? Who is allowing this to happen? Human beings are. Not just the government. Human beings drive cars instead of walking and biking. This is not just the government's fault but humanity as a whole. Cannot blame it on the government. Who supports the oil companies? All consumers!
"Those parameters include yourself in the equation. "
Actually I ride my bike and walk everywhere. But really the problem is to do with not just cars, it is also possibly cow farts and pigs being penned up in sheds peeing and pooing all over causing pollution. I do not eat meat. I am not the problem.
natural rubber comes from a single species of tree, Hevea brasiliensis
I am not completely out of the system, no. But there is enough oil and natural gas for the occasional plastic.. and there is enough sand for the occasional glass window. It is the DAILY consumables that we must worry about, not the occasional tire or permanent glass window.
Prohibiting the use of polluting machinery would be too demanding, for our reliance on them has become too great. And the carbon taxes go to the innovation of alternative resources like wind, solar, bio, and nuclear.
i agree with the asian dude. totally, on another note, my opinion, i truly belive the best way to save the enviroment/planet is to pump all... yes all! our co2 directly into al gores anus cavity and mouth, this would be the best place to put it because he can clearly store alota shit in there, or we just put it in the atmosphere, and the ocean will swallow it in the next cold cycle and then will spit it back out in the next warm 1... eventuly... assuming we get that cold cycle, like in the past
Imagine if the people back then came to the ridiculous conclusion that they were responsible for the change in climate. Then took drastic steps to try and change things back to what they thought was "normal". They would have spent large amounts of money, changed the way they did things and many people would have been impacted in ways that potentially would have seriously hurt their future(our present day).
We might not have the world we do today if they had freaked out like that.
Astronomers know that Jupiter is warming and so is Pluto. The moons of Jupiter and Saturn which were frozen are starting to melt. Is this more likely due to:
A). Man-made carbon-dioxide from Suv's and other sources reaching across outer space.
B).The people on Jupiter, Pluto, and these moons driving Suv's and polluting these environments.
The problem is not global warming, the problem is the toxins oil put into our water streams and lakes, and the detrimental effects of drilling for oil here on earth. Forget the stupid global warming and think about earth raping.
For hundreds of millions of years the earth has been going through changes in climate. You can't attribute that to man. Scientists accept that there were ice ages and then periods when the temperature increased. Was this temperature increase caused by man . Man's carbon-dioxide output ended the ice-age and killed the wooly mammoths and mastadons. Or was the climate change more likely caused by the sun.
You can however attribute problems down here to man, such as men that live near streams that are near oil digging centres of the world such as Fort McMurray in Alberta near edmonton. Forget about the sun - our problems have little to do with the sun. Our problems are local, similar to how cigarettes are local to the lungs. If one sniffs an exhaust pipe with his nose, this is a local problem in the city - not up in the Sun area.
You know I used to believe this whole man made Global Warming because thats all I ever heard. They say that no real scientists think otherwise. Unless they are paid by Big Oil. Since I took it upon myself to research the information I can only come to the conclusion that man-made global warming is Bogus!
algore is such a criminal scumbag, there ought to be a class-action lawsuit against this huckster! But I'm most saddened by the fact that there are so many gazillions of sheeples out there following his and others BULLSHIT!
Global warning: We are actually heading towards a new Ice Age, claim scientists
Report of 13 Nov 2008.
"Lead author Thomas Crowley from the University of Edinburgh and Canadian colleague William Hyde say that currently vilified greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide could actually be the key to averting the chill."
Solar activity does wax and wane, the earth also wobbles so the position of equator changes. There is a natural cycle it however appears human activity has amplified it. The earth will survive it. Will humans? The sun is major driver but gases can trap that energy and keep it from escaping.
"There is a natural cycle it however appears human activity has amplified it." Just say anything, is that your pathetic ploy?
Laughable, "The sun is major driver but gases can trap that energy and keep it from escaping." Geez, such intelligence, but ZERO integrity. How come no mentioning of water vapor? No mentioning of CO2 sinks?
Now that the truth is emerging and the liars are being exposed, losers like you are now deploying ad hoc responses as rebuttals?
First it was the commies,then it was UFO`s,then it was terrorism,now its Climate change,anything to scare the masses,and divert your attention away from what there up to.WAKE UP AMERICA YOUR DREAMING.
Excellent video and it should be played over and over again! This global warming thing is the worst hoax brought upon the american people.How the hell could Gore get a nobel peace prize for something that isn't proven yet?
Union of Concerned Scientists, Greenpeace and other organizations have cited DR. DAVID LEGATES' ties to several groups that have supported or emphasized skeptical stands on climate change, while they also received regular contributions from ExxonMobil. Those organizations include the National Center for Policy Analysis, which has received about $421,000 from ExxonMobil, and the George C. Marshall Institute, which received $630,000.
Those are some pretty shaky connections. I know Dr. Legates personally and I would never consider him a liar. I would also say that the financial opportunities of taking your particular stance far outweigh the financial opportunities of going against the flow.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Ferguson set up the Center for Science and Public Policy in early 2003, after a $100,000 grant from ExxonMobil in 2002 - specifically tagged for the center. Exxon has continued to fund the Center each year since then, to the tune of at least $50,000 a year. The Center's chief scientific researcher is sceptic WILLIE SOON.
$50,000 per year it must be a massive center, I know organizations where that wouldn't cover their pens and stationary supplies for a year! Let alone run an office. Get real.
hmm... coz he's stepping down soon? he knew down right from the beginning that climate change is real. but for his own political reason he disagrees. what do you think?
Who would have thought that the Sun is responsible for the Earth's climate???? And that CO2 FOLLOWS temperature changes? Algore gives us humans too much credit.
Wake up, folks. Global warming is the latest tool used by governments to control the development of 3rd world countries. They don't care if it's real or not, just so long as it lets them keep these countries in the dark ages by prohibiting the use of energy sources that contribute to "global warming".
CONGRATULATIONS! Thus we may show fearful aggressives that only through Mutual-aid and Reconciliating Autarky we can adapt, instead of self-destructive hate.
anyone notice how similar the guys voice sounds like microsoft SAM text to speech that comes with windows?
alberto148 1 month ago
they chop down trees, carbon is not a problem unless it turns into carbon monoxide, cars, stoves, coal, etc... this world works on balance and it is not
MrAstro888 11 months ago
I wonder about the four ice ages. How could there be two miles of ice above me, here in Minnesota, four times building up and four times melting, when there were no humans here at all? The climate has never been stable and never will be. Change is the norm, day night, winter summer, ice age, warming age. It takes cycles to sustain life.
jackgoldman1 1 year ago
@jackgoldman1 You must be a complete moron.
nilbud 4 months ago
Higher CO2 lags global warming. The scientific community knows this - including the IPCC - but this fact doesn't suit the desire to manipulate global economies. Some lie for money. Some lie for power.
757optim 1 year ago
derrick713
A dumb ass is the one who refused to look at and learn from new information.
Have you been paying any attention to global weather these past few years? The game is a foot and it's going to clobber us.
All the while you folks will continue to refuse to pull your collective heads out of the sand they're buried in... what a tragedy.
citizenschallengeYT 1 year ago
This is an inconvenient video for Al Gore.
firstchairs 1 year ago 2
@firstchairs You'rer an ignorant gullible person, you've been lied to by scam artists and you fell for it because you're uneducated and slow.
nilbud 4 months ago
@nilbud Al should give all his money to the poor
firstchairs 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
graph at 4:30 indicated the Earth has cooled 2 degrees since 2001.
Where do those numbers come from?
Certainly not from NASA GISS data.
ps. past twelve months has been the warmest year on record.
citizenschallengeYT 1 year ago
graph at 4:30 indicated the Earth has cooled 2 degrees since 2001.
Where do those numbers come from?
Certainly not from NASA GISS data.
ps. past twelve months has been the warmest year on record.
citizenschallengeYT 1 year ago
@citizenschallengeYT a two year old video kinda hard for them to put in the last twelve months ... your a dumb ass
derrick713 1 year ago
@derrick713 They were lying then too.
nilbud 4 months ago
Thousands of scientists live of of grants to study global warming. if they admit we don't affect it: they will have to write new grant requests and find new fields to work in in many cases. many are also directly on the progressive agenda's take and will lie to the end! the forests of the earth give off more CO2 than humans could ever dream of doing! so lets chop down the forrests! elephants fart alot too. kill all the elephants, or at least inject them with gasX or beano!
urbngrla 1 year ago
@urbngrla I wonder if Gore has given up eating steaks...how about the rest of them like Pelosi? Cows fart too. Ha!
firstchairs 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@urbngrla You're a liar and a fool.
nilbud 4 months ago
Time to stop trying to save the planet (it has been here for billions of years it will be here when were long gone) and save oursleves. There are diseases, comets, and wars that will wipe us out, not global warming. As this video states (with hard evidence) during the Medieval Age the temp. was 5 degrees warmer than it is today, and we were FINE! Stop believing political propaganda and think for yourself.
StormTrooper330 1 year ago
@StormTrooper330 You're uneducated and that's why simple lies fool you. You should fuck off away from the internet as you just bore the fuck out of everyone with your predictable ignorant fear.
nilbud 4 months ago
@nilbud Ummm ok. Obviously you did not grasp the ideal of my statement. I was saying do not believe the lies. And sense you can't even make a logical, rational "response" you are indeed the uneducated one. I await for your predictable ARROGANT response, you peon.
StormTrooper330 4 months ago
So, the policy makers go back to the scientists and ask them whether they could "sex up" their documents. Is Tony Blair involved in this some way? (He has to go before the Iraq war inquiry next Friday, so he won't have time to read this...ha ha ha!)
EC0N0MY7 2 years ago
uhh ok
coolzdew 2 years ago
common sense prevails
SteveOSpielberg 2 years ago
Greenland was green 500 years ago.... Oh My! and they didn't have a crook like Al Gore 2 blame us for it!
sammy90069 2 years ago 11
@sammy90069 not entire greenland, of course, only fringes of it. (they are still quite unlivable for people who sow&herd)
coturnix19 1 year ago
Comment removed
OvoidCranium 1 year ago
The most logical cause is presented here,without the money motivator that drives the asshole Gore agenda.
pauliewaulieflimflam 2 years ago
The fact that the Sun has had virtually no sunspots for the past two years and that the Earth, according to the satelite data and Argos data show the Earth has cooled down dramatically in the past 18 months. This is proof positive the Sun is by far the major driver of our climate and completely dwarfs the imagined affects of man made global warming due to CO2emissions.
Michaelwiseguy 2 years ago 4
Comment removed
curingaging00 2 years ago
In Al Gore's AIT the graphics are slick, the video theatrical and his claim that CO2 concentrations drive temperature are false. In fact the relationship is the other way around - Higher concentrations of CO2 lag the temperature change. Gore has it wrong. The IPCC has it wrong!... and the Kyoto Protocol has it wrong. The EPA is outside the science when it advocates a finding for CO2 as a pollutant. Without this compound planet earth would be a very lifeless place.
gregstarke14 2 years ago
This video gives a false picture. The majority of scientists studying climate change believe that the sudden global warming in the last 50 years were caused by C02 emissions. Of course there should be room for scientific discussion, but this video is misleading.
anotherelvis 2 years ago
In history the majority of scientists also believed that continents did not move, that the earth was flat and that we could never go to the moon.
Anyone that begged to differ was murdered and/or ridiculed and/or fired.
bakasheru 2 years ago
That is true, but the video presented the solar theory as if it was allready acepted. The truth is that they lack evidence.
anotherelvis 2 years ago
HAHAHAHAHAHA
Evolution is presented as truth.
Quantum physics is presented as truth.
The Hadron Collider can generate black holes... its a mystery how the hell that got accepted as truth. XD
This is just a nice kick in the balls that make people think. Presenting the other "truth"
bakasheru 2 years ago
@bakasheru that argument could be used towards either side
so i'm not really sure which side youre arguing for.
darris321 2 years ago
I never argued for any side.
Just pointing out that we should not label something false or incorrect because the entire world wants us to believe CO2 is the true and only problem.
But.... if you really want me to pick a side... it won't be a happy one.
Save the planet, kill your self.
bakasheru 2 years ago
so because i didn't know which side you were arguing from and (in my opinion) i pointed that out quite politely
you tell me i should kill myself?
you've got problems man.
darris321 2 years ago
I think the real issue is here what it should have been decades ago: Are we going to go nuclear? Nuclear energy is worth adding to the collective alternative energies right now and stop, they should have emphasized that above the cap and trade. I have been arguing on the side of nuclear for economics', and for climate changes' sake for some time, hopefully the crisis may help with opinion of this source (nuclear) as an option.
suemorphplus2009 2 years ago
FAIL
Alvin691 2 years ago
An interesting article from the July edition of the BBC Focus Magazine. It says astronomers say the Sun is the 'quietest' it has been for almost 100 years. There is also a 50-year low in the solar wind pressure. It has been going through a cooling down period for the last 20 years and yet overall global temperatures are still rising. So increased sun activity cannot be blamed for the rise in Earth's temperatures.
Richard482 2 years ago
Richard482: You misunderstand the way the sun works. When the sun is active, the strong solar magnetic field reduces the amount of cosmic radiation (muons) reaching the earth. When it is quiet, as now, cosmic radiation is increased.
Water vapour condenses around muons to form clouds. The more clouds, the less heat reaches earth from the sun. This is reflected in the observed temperature record for the last decade. The mean solar cycle is 11 years (actually 10.7), not 20 years.
onoropu 2 years ago
the problem you have here, is that the average temp is going down. co2 makes up 4% of greenhouse gas, and manmade co2 is a small percentage of that. 95% of greenhouse gas is water vapor. should we drain the oceans?
kerritrans 2 years ago
Also, they seem to think the IPCC is being forced to make warming work worse. However, it is the other way around. Oil companies and others pay scientists to give information against human caused warming. Today's warming is beyond a reasonable doubt caused by human CO2. Also, their argument that temp changes come before Co2 is BS. We don't know everything about warming, but we DO know that human CO2 IS CAUSING IT AND THAT GLOBAL WARMING HAS HUGE AND PREVENTABLE CONSEQUENCES.
thetotalvidwatcher 2 years ago
@thetotalvidwatcher Oil companies have spent more and contributed more money to the coffers of PRO CO2-caused organizations like Greenpeace and the WWF than anyone else.
CO2 does not drive climate. It is the byproduct of higher temperatures, which is caused by the SUN. Warmer temps + more CO2 = more plant growth and flourishing, which in turn causes mammals to thrive more as well. It is a win-win for all around. If CO2 is such a worry for you, why not kill yourself? Bye carbon footprint!
sykopath66190 1 year ago
The Unstoppable solar cycles video is propaganda, the equivilent of political smear tactics. There is only one experienced environental scientist on the show (David Legates) the other looks more like an amueture. The fact is these people are holding up progress to cut CO2 emmisions. This video deserves a spot on everybody's "Wall of Shame" if you will. They present little solid evidence. Co2/human caused warming is proven beyond a reasonable doubt
thetotalvidwatcher 2 years ago
thetotalvidwatcher: Take the total world anthropogenic greenhous gas emissions, and divide by the total world population. This calculates an average carbon footprint. Now, given that the world population doubles every 70 years or so, we would need to halve the average carbon footprint every 70 years, for ever, just to maintain the status quo.
Whether global warming is "proven" or not, just reducing emissions can not be a long-term answer. It is a distraction from real investigative science.
onoropu 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This video is propaganda
thetotalvidwatcher 2 years ago
Without CO2 the planet dies. CO2 in the 1960s was among the lowest in the history of the planet. The best climate the planet ever had, was with 4000ppm of CO2, or more than 10x current level.
Brantoc 2 years ago
I Hope Obama fires all the scam artist in our government. No more lying to America and the world.
littlerocken 3 years ago
Even if the government are idiots and think global warming is the problem, it does not matter because they are at least concerned about the environment on earth. There is no doubt that raping the oil on the earth destroys lakes, rivers, etc and causes cancer in communities downstream of oil diggers. There is also no doubt about the exhaust fumes causing problems similar to how tobacco smoke going into lungs causes problems. The problem is down here on earth, not up in the sun!
thiswasatest 2 years ago
No they are not concerned. If they were, they would be removing pollutants that actually are harmful to life, and they also wouldn't be allowing your local air to become fouled. What they are doing is instituting a farce in order to collect new taxes that will be placed on anything made from oil, or trees, or releases carbon dioxide, which we exhale, in some way or another.
It is called theft, but they con people into believing they are helping by paying the carbon dioxide tax.
hubristime 2 years ago
"No they are not concerned. If they were, they would be removing pollutants that actually are harmful to life, and they also wouldn't be allowing your local air to become fouled."
Allowing your local air to become fouled? Who is allowing this to happen? Human beings are. Not just the government. Human beings drive cars instead of walking and biking. This is not just the government's fault but humanity as a whole. Cannot blame it on the government. Who supports the oil companies? All consumers!
thiswasatest 2 years ago
Those parameters include yourself in the equation.
hubristime 2 years ago
"Those parameters include yourself in the equation. "
Actually I ride my bike and walk everywhere. But really the problem is to do with not just cars, it is also possibly cow farts and pigs being penned up in sheds peeing and pooing all over causing pollution. I do not eat meat. I am not the problem.
thiswasatest 2 years ago
And where do your bike tires come from. Are you sure you are completely out of the system? Do you have solar power for your computer?
hubristime 2 years ago
natural rubber comes from a single species of tree, Hevea brasiliensis
I am not completely out of the system, no. But there is enough oil and natural gas for the occasional plastic.. and there is enough sand for the occasional glass window. It is the DAILY consumables that we must worry about, not the occasional tire or permanent glass window.
thiswasatest 2 years ago 3
Prohibiting the use of polluting machinery would be too demanding, for our reliance on them has become too great. And the carbon taxes go to the innovation of alternative resources like wind, solar, bio, and nuclear.
LegitDVS 2 years ago
One is crap. The other derives it's funding from a lie which makes justifying it also a crappy thing to say.
hubristime 2 years ago
Yeah, im pretty sure if they passed a law with stricts against automobiles you'd think "they care" and wouldnt complain at all.
LegitDVS 2 years ago
i agree with the asian dude. totally, on another note, my opinion, i truly belive the best way to save the enviroment/planet is to pump all... yes all! our co2 directly into al gores anus cavity and mouth, this would be the best place to put it because he can clearly store alota shit in there, or we just put it in the atmosphere, and the ocean will swallow it in the next cold cycle and then will spit it back out in the next warm 1... eventuly... assuming we get that cold cycle, like in the past
longdaybignight 3 years ago
Imagine if the people back then came to the ridiculous conclusion that they were responsible for the change in climate. Then took drastic steps to try and change things back to what they thought was "normal". They would have spent large amounts of money, changed the way they did things and many people would have been impacted in ways that potentially would have seriously hurt their future(our present day).
We might not have the world we do today if they had freaked out like that.
backinthehole 3 years ago
Astronomers know that Jupiter is warming and so is Pluto. The moons of Jupiter and Saturn which were frozen are starting to melt. Is this more likely due to:
A). Man-made carbon-dioxide from Suv's and other sources reaching across outer space.
B).The people on Jupiter, Pluto, and these moons driving Suv's and polluting these environments.
C).The increased output of the sun's energy.
D). Big Oil paying off the people of Jupiter.
atum9ankh 3 years ago 3
The problem is not global warming, the problem is the toxins oil put into our water streams and lakes, and the detrimental effects of drilling for oil here on earth. Forget the stupid global warming and think about earth raping.
thiswasatest 2 years ago 2
I agree with you 100%.
atum9ankh 2 years ago
For hundreds of millions of years the earth has been going through changes in climate. You can't attribute that to man. Scientists accept that there were ice ages and then periods when the temperature increased. Was this temperature increase caused by man . Man's carbon-dioxide output ended the ice-age and killed the wooly mammoths and mastadons. Or was the climate change more likely caused by the sun.
Think about it.
atum9ankh 3 years ago
You can however attribute problems down here to man, such as men that live near streams that are near oil digging centres of the world such as Fort McMurray in Alberta near edmonton. Forget about the sun - our problems have little to do with the sun. Our problems are local, similar to how cigarettes are local to the lungs. If one sniffs an exhaust pipe with his nose, this is a local problem in the city - not up in the Sun area.
thiswasatest 2 years ago
I agree!
atum9ankh 2 years ago
You know I used to believe this whole man made Global Warming because thats all I ever heard. They say that no real scientists think otherwise. Unless they are paid by Big Oil. Since I took it upon myself to research the information I can only come to the conclusion that man-made global warming is Bogus!
atum9ankh 3 years ago
algore is such a criminal scumbag, there ought to be a class-action lawsuit against this huckster! But I'm most saddened by the fact that there are so many gazillions of sheeples out there following his and others BULLSHIT!
kickyerass 3 years ago
Do a search for the following phrase:
Global warning: We are actually heading towards a new Ice Age, claim scientists
Report of 13 Nov 2008.
"Lead author Thomas Crowley from the University of Edinburgh and Canadian colleague William Hyde say that currently vilified greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide could actually be the key to averting the chill."
So now CO2 is my friend??!! I should make some??
pvsheridan 3 years ago
Solar activity does wax and wane, the earth also wobbles so the position of equator changes. There is a natural cycle it however appears human activity has amplified it. The earth will survive it. Will humans? The sun is major driver but gases can trap that energy and keep it from escaping.
zaurakdigis 3 years ago
"There is a natural cycle it however appears human activity has amplified it." Just say anything, is that your pathetic ploy?
Laughable, "The sun is major driver but gases can trap that energy and keep it from escaping." Geez, such intelligence, but ZERO integrity. How come no mentioning of water vapor? No mentioning of CO2 sinks?
Now that the truth is emerging and the liars are being exposed, losers like you are now deploying ad hoc responses as rebuttals?
Don't make us all LAUGH!
pvsheridan 3 years ago
First it was the commies,then it was UFO`s,then it was terrorism,now its Climate change,anything to scare the masses,and divert your attention away from what there up to.WAKE UP AMERICA YOUR DREAMING.
bodmas1000 3 years ago
It was the commies and it is terrorism, but it's not climate change.
dyamarick 3 years ago
.
Definition of U.N. Science:
A theory supported not by observation but by ad hominem arguments against its detractors
.
thinkpolicy 3 years ago
EXXON funded, EXXON approved. Guys in this video bought and paid for long ago.
jodateti 3 years ago
IF true, whats wrong with that?!?
It's ok if big companies fund agw histeria spreading organisations (and making money on that)?
pizgacz22 3 years ago
clearly a biased conclusion
claims such as before 1850 there wasn't any significant carbon released by human action is FALSE.
Not to mention the other elements released into the atmosphere such as methane
Is global warming coming from the sun ? certainly yes.
Is that a reason to dismiss human consumption patterns as part of the problem ? no
lextalionis2001 3 years ago
Excellent video and it should be played over and over again! This global warming thing is the worst hoax brought upon the american people.How the hell could Gore get a nobel peace prize for something that isn't proven yet?
104bigTruck 3 years ago
HAHA nice man
kgj08 3 years ago
Union of Concerned Scientists, Greenpeace and other organizations have cited DR. DAVID LEGATES' ties to several groups that have supported or emphasized skeptical stands on climate change, while they also received regular contributions from ExxonMobil. Those organizations include the National Center for Policy Analysis, which has received about $421,000 from ExxonMobil, and the George C. Marshall Institute, which received $630,000.
calsurf86 3 years ago
Those are some pretty shaky connections. I know Dr. Legates personally and I would never consider him a liar. I would also say that the financial opportunities of taking your particular stance far outweigh the financial opportunities of going against the flow.
kgj08 3 years ago 3
exxonsecrets . org
calsurf86 3 years ago
And the IPCC would continue to exist if man had nothing to do with Climate Change? Talk about a vested interest......
jbtascam 3 years ago
Making money on AGW alarmism is a great business. Look at honda's sales, Al Gore's co2 company income etc.
pizgacz22 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ferguson set up the Center for Science and Public Policy in early 2003, after a $100,000 grant from ExxonMobil in 2002 - specifically tagged for the center. Exxon has continued to fund the Center each year since then, to the tune of at least $50,000 a year. The Center's chief scientific researcher is sceptic WILLIE SOON.
calsurf86 3 years ago
$50,000 per year it must be a massive center, I know organizations where that wouldn't cover their pens and stationary supplies for a year! Let alone run an office. Get real.
ernieelu 3 years ago
LOL!
ntuman 3 years ago
Good video - open the debate up!
TomHarrisNRSP 3 years ago 5
these 2 guys are paid handsomely by bush
ntuman 3 years ago
yeah, but bush believes in climate change now. what does that tell you?
straightj23 3 years ago
hmm... coz he's stepping down soon? he knew down right from the beginning that climate change is real. but for his own political reason he disagrees. what do you think?
ntuman 3 years ago
Climate change is real. It just isn't changed by people. Remove the spaces:
sepp . org / publications / NIPCC_final . pdf
ArgoNunya 3 years ago 3
Who would have thought that the Sun is responsible for the Earth's climate???? And that CO2 FOLLOWS temperature changes? Algore gives us humans too much credit.
mightybrick 3 years ago 3
Wake up, folks. Global warming is the latest tool used by governments to control the development of 3rd world countries. They don't care if it's real or not, just so long as it lets them keep these countries in the dark ages by prohibiting the use of energy sources that contribute to "global warming".
robing66066 3 years ago
You can call here (The Heartland Institute) to get a copy of this on DVD: 312.377.4000
Anyone who answers the phone can help.
CountyMan08 3 years ago
So, the sky isn't really falling? Wow, who would ever have thought?
ET60BLB 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
A very selective presentation. Was this sponsored by oil companies? No contrary scientific opinion, an there is, was presented.
randall2020 3 years ago
... you mean like Al Gore's movie had "contrary scientific opinion"?
Spyridon42 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
A very selective presentation. Was this sponsored by oil companies? No contrary scientific opinion, an there is, was presented.
randall2020 3 years ago
CONGRATULATIONS! Thus we may show fearful aggressives that only through Mutual-aid and Reconciliating Autarky we can adapt, instead of self-destructive hate.
relaxpeace 3 years ago
I love this video. I pray all the Catholic prarishes around the world to have a copy.
maryjo97 3 years ago
The best global warming video. Michael, scientist emeritus, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Michael4Wright 3 years ago 3
Great video. Too bad the truth is so hard to get out...
ArgoNunya 3 years ago 3
interesting, where did this air?
.
thinkpolicy 3 years ago