You never answered my question. What is your definition of deadly mean? Fatal, extremely dangerous, mild...what? I don't want to hear your unsubstantiated claims. I was just going to answer your questions. What measurement of radiation you taking about? Never mind that James Van Allen concurred about safe passage through them.
@kaderoder Define deadly...what amount of ReM we talking about now? And exactly for speed was a maximum speed of 25,000 mph....giver take a hundred or so miles per hour. That is about exact is your going to get from me!
@RedneckR0nin Well, lets put it this way... all astronaut's are classed as 'radiation workers' Astronauts have only a limited time in low earth orbit, once they have received the maximum allowed radiation exposure, they can never return to space. And thats on THIS side of the VAB. Are you aware that MOST astronauts spent MOST of their time feeling very sick? Why do you think this is? Nerves? Homesick? No, its radiation.
in fact Nasa cannot go further than 400 miles from earth because Cosmic Radiation would incinerate the astronauts in seconds I would love to watch that LIVE on TV
You are certainly welcome to think and believe what you will. However, no one will ever convince me that the moon landing was anything other thatn the greatest technological achievement of the 20th Century.
The "hoax" theory is a waste of time and beneath comment. Werner Von Braun and his team wanted to surrender to the Americans rather than the Soviets at the end of WWII, for obvious reasons. This team built the Saturn V rocket that got us to the moon. Grumman and NA Rockwell built the spacecraft, Armstong, Aldrin, and Collins were the perfect choice for astronauts for this mission, Gene Kranz and the Mission Control team were the best! Stop denigrating their achievement!!!!
@kaderoder something to do with flying through them at absurdly fast speeds, thereby seriously limiting their exposure.on return to earth it was found that astronauts had in fact been exposed to intense radiation levels.
@brianwilson49 That may be true. It is worth noting , however, that every explanation for surviving the van allen belts, has been different. You explanation is a new one. Some say they were shielded by materials on the craft. Some say they went through a weak area of the belts. Buzz himself says he didnt know anything about the belts. (odd). You say they went through really fast. Wanting it to be real isnt enough, 'Facts' shouldnt vary so much. But who am i kidding? Garage science owns youtube.
THEY DON'T VARY. AT ALL. Everything you said is true; they went through fast (REALLY FAST, this is space travel) they went through a thin area (the belts are donut shaped and the went out at a 30 degree angle from the equator, there by just grazing the edge) Buzz probably didn't know (that wasn't an area he needed to worry about, NASA had thousands of scientists to worry about that for him so he could concentrate on doing his job)....Van Allen Hoax theories are the easiest to shoot down...
THEY DON'T VARY. AT ALL. Everything you said is true; they went through fast (REALLY FAST, this is space travel) they went through a thin area (the belts are donut shaped and the went out at a 30 degree angle from the equator, there by just grazing the edge) Buzz probably didn't know (that wasn't an area he needed to worry about, NASA had thousands of scientists to worry about that for him so he could concentrate on doing his job)....Van Allen Hoax theories are the easiest to shoot down...
@jcotterm True. Especially that Van Allen himself never thought that 'his' belt could be a problem on a moon mission (the way they went). So conspiration theorist don't have his support.... (sorry i know => he was paid to say that! It makes sense now! right...)
@kaderoder its nice to have a response from a hoax theorist that doesnt border on the hysterical, you have broken the mold so thankyou!
the explanation i gave is the only one i have ever read personally. i have read alot about apollo and i only read books by people who know what they are banging on about frankly. i am no qualified scientist so i can only give you the explanation i have read by those who are.
i take your point about garage scientists on youtube. it cuts both ways, however.
@brianwilson49 No probs. We're not enemy's, we are on this ride together. I have no beef with those who believe the landings were real, its the liars that fed us this poison to which i would direct any malice. The politics of the day made it necessary to claim such an event took place and we have all been robbed of our real history. Only now with this marvelous computer age that facts can become viral, overnight, and censors cannot control the net. Clear ur mind and have a fresh look :o)
@kaderoder with respect,i havent been 'fed' anything,and it is woefully patronising to suggest that to anyone who doesnt agree with you. there is insurmountable scientific evidence to say that we went to the moon, the lunar ranging experiment instigated by apollo 11 being the one that is irrefutable.
All time i have a tete a tete with hoax theorists, not one of them has been able to supply SCIENTIFIC data to suggest otherwise.i'm not interested in partial photo evidence and conjecture.
@kaderoder thank you. it is due to the bravery and courage of the apollo crews that i can study the nature of the moons orbital trajectory - it is moving away from us at approximately 38mm each year. fascinating data such as this all recorded continuously for the last 35/40 years thanks to apollo.
The landing part is so fake, even I can see that. The moon is moving to quick and shaky especially since it has no atmosphere or winds. And then comes that rediculous shadow... common
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Wake up Guys, the actual achievement of that goal was and still is unfulfilled.
Regrettably NASA realised that the scientific and technical hurdles could not be surmounted within the time limit. In 1967 with the end of the decade fast approaching and with budgets blown out of all proportion, the task was assigned to the celluloid masters of Hollywood to create the believable illusion that "THE GOAL" would be achieved.
@xbroadcaster1991well.... one of the branche of religion is science...it was as old as religion on this planet...no matter if u are discovering now....we are not surprised by the inventions and dicoveries of science that were stated in quran 1400 years before...still lots more coming in our way God willingly...
It's difficult for people to understand what White people in America were capable of in previous generations, so they have to make up silly conspiracy theories to explain it. They truly don't understand the intelligence, courage and creativity of White Men, so they imagine it must have been a hoax - after all, none of their hiphop friends could do it.
This was America at its peak. Note the overwhelming Whiteness of this America compared to now. What you see here - the intelligence, the courage, the healthy culture - is all dead now. Half of all children under the age of 5 are non-White in America and it will get worse rapidly. Social scientists now know that higher ethnic diversity equals a low trust society – more depression and criminality. And IQ and behavior is linked to ethnicity. This was America. Say goodbye to it.
You old folks watched the moonlanding, we will watch how people set foot on Mars. Than, again, people will start screaming: ITS fake. The only thing that says about them they have fake brains.
@RapLibrary Yes, I actually saw the lunar landings, but I'm afraid You will not see a Mars landing, because no one will be willing to put up the billions it will cost. Not in this century, anyhow...
fuck he did...he canceled the constellation program for sure now and thats it. I really liked him but thats it now 4 me- I cant support somebody who is so shortsighted.
Shifting space to private company´s will cost lives...thats a fact in my eyes.
ed 11561: hey tell me this. how do you explain moonrocks? Yeah we didn't go to the moon...It's fuck heads like you who have no idea what your talking about. Pull your dildo out of your ass and shut the fuck up. You know nothing about anything
@brianwilson49 Why the fuck r u stupid enough to as me anything asshole.Only nasa knows the truth.lol Go ask them -& make sure u parrot what they say word for word. lol
@cadu1995 "Why the fuck r u stupid enough to as me anything asshole."
i cant fault you there. you clearly know very little, but what is slightly sadder is that you seem very unprepared to expand your thinking and leave behind your 'flat earth' style knee jerk reactions.
@brianwilson49 Did you name yourself after the psychotic-paranoid-schizophrenic Beachboy faggot? LOL Must have because u r deluded beyond all comprehension.
@brianwilson49 i'M AFRAID OF Assholes with Beach Boys names as utube pages call signs. lol U wouldn't know the truth if it was shoved down your throat.
Heb er snachts om 4 uur ned tijd naar gekeken je zag er niet veel van omdat de beeldkwalietijt toen nog niet zo goed was Niel Armstrong was niet meer dan een vage witte schim ik was toe 11 jaar
É preciso ser cientista para acreditar nos alunizagens e é preciso acrecitar nas alunizagens para ser cientista.
Não sou cientista, então posso naturalmente acreditar ou não, depende apenas dos meus conhecimentos, diferentemente de cientistas que dependem totalmente de informações e conclusões de terçeiros.
What an achievement this was....just one thing though. How did the astronauts feel when they went so close but yet so far. I mean the thickness of their gloves away from actually touching the moon! It must have been so fustrating....or maybe that's just me. I guess that is one of the next challenges. For man to truly walk on the moon.
They never went to the moon. The evidence of a hoax is crushing. Do YouTube searches on "Moonfaker" and "Apollo 15 flag waving". Do a Google Video search on "What happened on the Moon".
why is it everytime i wanna look at some amazing footage of the US space program, i have to suffer the demented dribbling rants of some social inadequates raging on about how it was hoaxed?
get a grib of yourselves - there is no evidence whatsoever to conclude that it was faked. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER apart from some inane freaks trying to make out they know more about science and technology that 400,000 very talented and committed people involved in the space program.capiche?freaks.
@brianwilson49 There is TONS of evidence that apollo was faked.From their wire walking on the moon to the fake photo shoots & Million dollar moon globes complete with camera tracks to "capture" the moon landings. I guess some people r still just lemmings & sheep who believe everything-no matter how stupid or far-fetched it is.lol
if you could show me a gram of evidence then i'd be prepared to listen. and please dont send me 800 links to loads of 3rd rate poorly presented and researched new age freak sites, designed for people who go around the place wearing bacofoil on their head.
just a gram of evidence please.
now, lets start with the lunar ranging experiment shall we?
LMFAO just looking at the pix of the apparent 'different accoutrements' being worn by buzz. these retards know nothing about how aperture settings on cameras has to be used to compensate for the amount of light on front of an object compared to the amount of light behind it.
there's good science (NASA) and bad science (retarded bacofoil social inadequate's ill informed websites)
please do not waste our time with any more of this crap.
@cadu1995 what amazes me about you lot is how NASA would have spent billions on supposedly trying to fool the entirety of humanity for ever, and yet would have forgotten something as basic as giving buzz the same pair of gloves in different pictures.
the hoax theories dont add up, kay? they dont add up in terms of common sense, or in terms of science. if they did, why wouldnt every scientist in the world have noticed by now?
oh yeah, i forgot. its a conspiracy and they're all in on it.
@brianwilson49@brianwilson49 Every scientist in the world doesn't really give a fuck about nasa or apollo or anyting but their own job & theme of experiments. U assholes think that every scientist just sat down & feverishly tried to debunk the supposed moon landings?
NOT AT ALL. They said Oh Really? Great work-PERIOD-they didn't even THINK to discuss it in 1969 when everyone knew AMERICA WAS GREAT & they beat the nasty RUSSIANS.-the ugly dogs of russia.
@cadu1995 not every scientist cares about nasa you say? thats interesting, because it is mainly due to our exploration of space (with nasa at the forefront) that has enlightened so much of the scientific world over the last 5 decades or so.
@brianwilson49 BTW show me a film of the CM turning completely around & pulling the LEM out of its ass-docking up with the LEM-and having the 2 astro-nots crawl into the lem & then having it blast off to the moon.IMFUCKENPOSSIBLE. lol
@brianwilson49@brianwilson49 i'M AFRAID OF Assholes with Beach Boys names as utube pages call signs. lol U wouldn't know the truth if it was shoved down your throat.
@brianwilson49 BTW show me a film of the CM turning completely around & pulling the LEM out of its ass-docking up with the LEM-and having the 2 astro-nots crawl into the lem & then having it blast off to the moon.IMFUCKENPOSSIBLE. lol
Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawn. Oh I'm sorry were trying to pick a fight on the internet, I'm sorry.
@brianwilson49 BTW show me a film of the CM turning completely around & pulling the LEM out of its ass-docking up with the LEM-and having the 2 astro-nots crawl into the lem & then having it blast off to the moon.IMFUCKENPOSSIBLE. lol
@jason66801 correct. and the evidence is based on sound scientific fact, rather than half baked ideas about different items of clothing in different photographs LOL.
the one that REALLY gets me is "but there are no stars in the pictures from the lunar surface". AAAAAAAAH! fucking retards!!
@brianwilson49 you said you wanted to look at the footage. not comments. so enjoy the footage and ignore the comments then. people are free to say wat they think
@brian wilson 49 you have nothing to complain about if your right. what you cant stand is all the errors pointed to you. you cant just ignore them oh no you have to defend NASA with your dying breath. even this statement requires no response but oh no here we go right.
@datzfast the 'errors' pointed out are conjecture unsubstantiated by any FACT! i', not defending NASA - if you can simply show me one FACT that PROVES we never went to the moon then i will change my opinion. i have seen MANY hoax theory videos and NONE of them provide HARD FACTS.
i simply say this - if we never went to the moon how to you explain the LLR experiment and the substantial data it has recorded over the last 40 odd years?
Lunar Laser Ranging experiment. one of the first carried out by apollo 11. it has provided a huge amount of data about the moon's trajectory around the earth, and much more. how can this POSSIBLY be faked?
The only fake in the apollo story was President Nixon who was up to no good even at this time into his presidency.
If the entire Apollo mission was a fraud what was the point in launching all those Saturn V knowing full well Russia were not quite ready in landing a cosmonaugt on to the moon.
It was only a matter of time before either America or Russia landed on the moon.
with over four pre moon saturn V launches it was Apollo 11 that finally got there.
Nixon axed the NASA budget in 1970. Think how far ahead we'd be if NASA had cart-blance like in the 1960s. We'd have hotels on the moon and Mars by now.
I imagine ye of small mind, you think Apollo 13 was fake also. I suppose you think NASA intentionally blew up the SM oxygen tanks to increase their TV ratings.
This is gonna blow you away. Never pay for another UFC fight again. They even have shows like Weeds, True Blood, and Hung. You have to take a peek at freetvfeeds. com
ok radiation is a very good argument! but look at the later lives of the Apollo astronauts, most of them have or had cancer! if the moon landing was a hoax why are there so many prooves for it?
it was a clear goal to land on the lunar surface before the russian do, and noone was interested in radiation (look at the first Atomic bomb tests!)
(1) Herbert Friedman, in his book "Sun and Earth," describes Van Allen's global survey of cosmic-ray intensity: "The results from Explorer I, launched on January 31, 1958, were so puzzling that instrument malfunction was suspected. High levels of radiation intensity appeared interspersed with dead gaps ... Explorer III succeeded fully, and most important, it carried a tape recorder. Simulation tests with intense X rays in the laboratory showed that the dead gaps
(2) represented periods when the Geiger counter in space had been choked by radiation of intensities a thousand times greater than the instrument was designed to detect. As Van Allen's colleague Ernie Ray exclaimed in disbelief: 'All space must be radioactive!'." Herbert Friedman later explains that "Of all the energy brought to the magnetosphere by the solar wind, only about 0.1 percent manages to cross the magnetic barrier."
first of all, the best proove of the moon landing is that the russian and the france whatched the Americans on moon ( there was cold war, and if the moon landing was a hoax the russian would have complained about!) It's very easy to land on a planet which has 1/6 gravity of the earth! and the way to moon and back was calculated by Isac Newton years before.... So where`s the problem?
There's a plan in place right now to go back to the moon, which Obama may have to cancel or at least postpone, because you just can't get away with splashing that many tax dollars on NASA any more. Even in the 60s, when space travel really captured the public's imagination, the high price of the Apollo program was controversial.
Yeah, so let's all sit here on Earth and allow financial holdups to limit our exploration of the unknown. Man... whatever happened to the concept of progress?
Professor John Searl's HORIZONTAL flight vehicle of which 41 were built and flown(unmanned) from 1952-1978, is a fuelless drive concept, at a cost vast sums below NASA and the Russians and Space Agency's VERTICAL fuel-burning concept. Search: SEG, and Swallowcommand. The work is being resurrected, acter decades of suppression. Have hope, help is on the way, courtesy of Brown, and Searl Effect Technology.
HOAX believer groups. I hate to burst your bubble. The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) is a robotic spacecraft launched June 18, 2009 by NASA currently orbiting the Moon. The orbiting probe will be able to provide a 3-D map of the Moon's surface and has provided some of the first images of Apollo equipment left on the Moon.
The 1960s was a boom in solid state electronics. i.e. transistor radios, compact TVs. The first touch screen computer I saw was in 1978 in the systems control room of a power company. It was used to open and close breakers for the line crews. All you young conspiracy theorists that think we where just a bunch of cavemen in the 60s and 70s. . . . In the 1970s my Honda Civic got 35 mpg. If we have advanced so much since then why are we still driving dinosaurs?
Greed, and suppression of clean-cheap energy devices and systems, which you may research, and build yourself if you have the requiste skills. The energy-crisis is a hoax. The moon-landings were real, but given the assist of top=secret propulsion technologies that are non-ballistic.
LOL o plz, nasa landed on the moon 4 times 40 yrs ago when tv's were still black and white? im sorry, i dont believe it, even today its almost freaking impossible to fix the restrooms in the space station.
if nasa had men on the moon 40 yrs ago, we should have been having a man on mars by now, reply and say "oh ur dumb we did land on the moon" i dont care what u say to me, now i see why this whole world is laughing at america
you're a very young person, I presume. believe it or not, we did have color tv's in the sixites and the last two moon landings were done in color.
about the space station, where do you think that technology came from? from all the work that those people did back in the sixites. The reason why we didn't continue going and beyond, was that IT GOT BORING!. People were losing interest in space travel
The hoax theorists have no choice but to try and claim that the film was slowed down because of the way the regolith (soil) moves when the astronauts kick it. The film being slowed down is easily debunked. Note the arm movement. If the film was slowed down 50 percent like these hoax theorist claim then that means all the guys in the film are moving their arms so fast they make Bruce Lee look like a couch potato. LOL
This has been flagged as spam show
NASA faked the Apollo moon missions in a studio. Here's a link to some of the proof.
spurstalk (dot) com/forums/showthread (dot) php?t=144487
Cosmored 1 week ago
I am very happy to see the vidoe Classic NASA Film Apollo from you, hopefully the others also are happy for You
Ondelendo 3 weeks ago
I Love The Video Classic NASA Film Apollo 11 It Can Increase My Knowledge
bebeheuy 3 weeks ago
Nice Video Classic NASA Film Apollo 11That You Share , So Very Nice Thanks You
willamricard 3 weeks ago
I Really Like The Video Classic NASA Film Apollo From Your
imegatrone 4 weeks ago
Your Video Watch more of the Moon Missions Is Very Useful Sharing
bundawartini 4 weeks ago
@kaderoder
You never answered my question. What is your definition of deadly mean? Fatal, extremely dangerous, mild...what? I don't want to hear your unsubstantiated claims. I was just going to answer your questions. What measurement of radiation you taking about? Never mind that James Van Allen concurred about safe passage through them.
RedneckR0nin 1 month ago
its a very osom!!
kqelviinn 3 months ago
who dislikes this??
commanderjude 6 months ago
Search "UFO Disclosure, Revelations & the 2012 Connection" ON
YOUTUBE This is a compilation of evidence revealed by former and present
American presidents, astronauts, military personnel, politicians along
with credible aired UFO footage. This compilation also contains planned
revelations regarding knowledge of life beyond Earth along with it's
current and ever ongoing presence which is being hidden from the public.
This has been hidden from the public for over 50 years. + MORE
Freedomloveandtruth 9 months ago
How fast did they travel? How long did they spend in the deadly radiation EXACTLY?
Please dont say 'not long' and 'very fast'
kaderoder 10 months ago
@kaderoder Define deadly...what amount of ReM we talking about now? And exactly for speed was a maximum speed of 25,000 mph....giver take a hundred or so miles per hour. That is about exact is your going to get from me!
RedneckR0nin 1 month ago
@RedneckR0nin Well, lets put it this way... all astronaut's are classed as 'radiation workers' Astronauts have only a limited time in low earth orbit, once they have received the maximum allowed radiation exposure, they can never return to space. And thats on THIS side of the VAB. Are you aware that MOST astronauts spent MOST of their time feeling very sick? Why do you think this is? Nerves? Homesick? No, its radiation.
kaderoder 1 month ago
I don't like the way Discovery speed up or otherwise condense the original footage. It loses something when they do that.
nasnema 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Apollo Fake Missions were recorded on earth
Moon Landings filmed on planet Earth
Nasa's Fake Apollo Universe has no stars and no colour
Heil Nazi NASA
Heil The United States NWO Criminal Government
NASA's Military Space Programme
fuckutube74 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fake it to the TV Moon
Apollo Style
NASA = FAKE
in 2011 Nazi Nasa still cannot go to the moon
in fact Nasa cannot go further than 400 miles from earth because Cosmic Radiation would incinerate the astronauts in seconds I would love to watch that LIVE on TV
fuckutube74 10 months ago
Classic NASA Fakery
fuckutube74 10 months ago
Comment removed
Futurecop2012 10 months ago
You are certainly welcome to think and believe what you will. However, no one will ever convince me that the moon landing was anything other thatn the greatest technological achievement of the 20th Century.
usafvet100 11 months ago 20
@usafvet100 amen to that
brianwilson49 11 months ago
The "hoax" theory is a waste of time and beneath comment. Werner Von Braun and his team wanted to surrender to the Americans rather than the Soviets at the end of WWII, for obvious reasons. This team built the Saturn V rocket that got us to the moon. Grumman and NA Rockwell built the spacecraft, Armstong, Aldrin, and Collins were the perfect choice for astronauts for this mission, Gene Kranz and the Mission Control team were the best! Stop denigrating their achievement!!!!
usafvet100 11 months ago 9
@usafvet100 the Nasa Nazi team built a rocket that went 100 miles into space
and Disny Faked the rest
Its the sickest Hoax in the history of the human race and the dumbest
in 2011 nasa still cant go to the moon
fuckutube74 11 months ago
Classic Nasa Fake Film
Apollo 11 HOAX
fuckutube74 11 months ago
Some people have no idea that a Russian named Yuri Gagarin was the first human to be in Space.
LegoMandLego1man 1 year ago
Van Allen Belts?? Radiation levels are lethal that far out. Explain this problem away for us.
kaderoder 1 year ago
@kaderoder something to do with flying through them at absurdly fast speeds, thereby seriously limiting their exposure.on return to earth it was found that astronauts had in fact been exposed to intense radiation levels.
brianwilson49 11 months ago
@brianwilson49 That may be true. It is worth noting , however, that every explanation for surviving the van allen belts, has been different. You explanation is a new one. Some say they were shielded by materials on the craft. Some say they went through a weak area of the belts. Buzz himself says he didnt know anything about the belts. (odd). You say they went through really fast. Wanting it to be real isnt enough, 'Facts' shouldnt vary so much. But who am i kidding? Garage science owns youtube.
kaderoder 11 months ago
THEY DON'T VARY. AT ALL. Everything you said is true; they went through fast (REALLY FAST, this is space travel) they went through a thin area (the belts are donut shaped and the went out at a 30 degree angle from the equator, there by just grazing the edge) Buzz probably didn't know (that wasn't an area he needed to worry about, NASA had thousands of scientists to worry about that for him so he could concentrate on doing his job)....Van Allen Hoax theories are the easiest to shoot down...
jcotterm 10 months ago
THEY DON'T VARY. AT ALL. Everything you said is true; they went through fast (REALLY FAST, this is space travel) they went through a thin area (the belts are donut shaped and the went out at a 30 degree angle from the equator, there by just grazing the edge) Buzz probably didn't know (that wasn't an area he needed to worry about, NASA had thousands of scientists to worry about that for him so he could concentrate on doing his job)....Van Allen Hoax theories are the easiest to shoot down...
jcotterm 10 months ago
@jcotterm True. Especially that Van Allen himself never thought that 'his' belt could be a problem on a moon mission (the way they went). So conspiration theorist don't have his support.... (sorry i know => he was paid to say that! It makes sense now! right...)
LotusNfx 9 months ago
@kaderoder its nice to have a response from a hoax theorist that doesnt border on the hysterical, you have broken the mold so thankyou!
the explanation i gave is the only one i have ever read personally. i have read alot about apollo and i only read books by people who know what they are banging on about frankly. i am no qualified scientist so i can only give you the explanation i have read by those who are.
i take your point about garage scientists on youtube. it cuts both ways, however.
brianwilson49 9 months ago
@brianwilson49 No probs. We're not enemy's, we are on this ride together. I have no beef with those who believe the landings were real, its the liars that fed us this poison to which i would direct any malice. The politics of the day made it necessary to claim such an event took place and we have all been robbed of our real history. Only now with this marvelous computer age that facts can become viral, overnight, and censors cannot control the net. Clear ur mind and have a fresh look :o)
kaderoder 9 months ago
@kaderoder with respect,i havent been 'fed' anything,and it is woefully patronising to suggest that to anyone who doesnt agree with you. there is insurmountable scientific evidence to say that we went to the moon, the lunar ranging experiment instigated by apollo 11 being the one that is irrefutable.
All time i have a tete a tete with hoax theorists, not one of them has been able to supply SCIENTIFIC data to suggest otherwise.i'm not interested in partial photo evidence and conjecture.
brianwilson49 9 months ago
@brianwilson49 Im glad to hear you enjoy the moon tales. Happiness is a personal endeavor and i wish you all the best.
kaderoder 9 months ago
@kaderoder thank you. it is due to the bravery and courage of the apollo crews that i can study the nature of the moons orbital trajectory - it is moving away from us at approximately 38mm each year. fascinating data such as this all recorded continuously for the last 35/40 years thanks to apollo.
brianwilson49 9 months ago
The landing part is so fake, even I can see that. The moon is moving to quick and shaky especially since it has no atmosphere or winds. And then comes that rediculous shadow... common
barthoedemaker 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Wake up Guys, the actual achievement of that goal was and still is unfulfilled.
Regrettably NASA realised that the scientific and technical hurdles could not be surmounted within the time limit. In 1967 with the end of the decade fast approaching and with budgets blown out of all proportion, the task was assigned to the celluloid masters of Hollywood to create the believable illusion that "THE GOAL" would be achieved.
yaluobud 1 year ago
3:27, I remember that film the failed one, When he was going down something happened on stage falling down.
mrrmaster1 1 year ago
You don't have to cheat a dishonest man ..... he takes care of that himself.
THREESIXNINE100 1 year ago
In 1932,Sir james jeans, an astrophysicist said: the universe appears to have been designed by a pure mathematician."
encyclopaedia britannica(1984)vol.15,p.531
Quran says in the chapter The Star: "that He did create the pairs, male and female,
from a sperm drop when lodged(in its place)
that He hath promised a second creation(raising of the dead)
that it is He who giveth wealth and satisfaction;
that He is the lord of sirius(The mighty star)"45-49
emaan456 1 year ago
@emaan456 Good explanation brother but you atheists really can't tolerate the association of Science with Religion.
xbroadcaster1991 1 year ago
@xbroadcaster1991well.... one of the branche of religion is science...it was as old as religion on this planet...no matter if u are discovering now....we are not surprised by the inventions and dicoveries of science that were stated in quran 1400 years before...still lots more coming in our way God willingly...
emaan456 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@emaan456 Good explanation brother but you atheists really can't tolerate the association of Science with Religion.
CORRECTION
I meant these Atheists :S sorry
xbroadcaster1991 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
FUCKING FAKE !
fuckmania07 1 year ago
It's difficult for people to understand what White people in America were capable of in previous generations, so they have to make up silly conspiracy theories to explain it. They truly don't understand the intelligence, courage and creativity of White Men, so they imagine it must have been a hoax - after all, none of their hiphop friends could do it.
jeffmaylor 1 year ago
This was America at its peak. Note the overwhelming Whiteness of this America compared to now. What you see here - the intelligence, the courage, the healthy culture - is all dead now. Half of all children under the age of 5 are non-White in America and it will get worse rapidly. Social scientists now know that higher ethnic diversity equals a low trust society – more depression and criminality. And IQ and behavior is linked to ethnicity. This was America. Say goodbye to it.
jeffmaylor 1 year ago
guys, SHUT UP!
ButterflyNM14 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
ASStraNOT what an NASSHOLE USA owes me an APOLLOGY
chillyrooster 1 year ago
sorry folks moon landings not a hoax !! tryin to pull a hoax like that many folks been goin to prison a long time
kfc63822 1 year ago
You old folks watched the moonlanding, we will watch how people set foot on Mars. Than, again, people will start screaming: ITS fake. The only thing that says about them they have fake brains.
Incredible video!
RapLibrary 1 year ago
@RapLibrary Yes, I actually saw the lunar landings, but I'm afraid You will not see a Mars landing, because no one will be willing to put up the billions it will cost. Not in this century, anyhow...
YDDES 1 year ago
Fuck me! even the adverts on YouTube are louder then the video. They do it with the TV and Radio and now they have taken the Internet :-(
Tzimnewman3 1 year ago
check out my channel i debunk the whole moon landing in under 2 minutes.
wakeupparty 1 year ago
well i dont think its fake, and dont know why i shoud, dont step in the bullshit guys.
but....
we will go soon again to the moon, the aspect in 2018.
obama confirmed this and with that he confirmed $400 billion.
its a long way but i cant wait !!!!!
silvermicc 1 year ago
@silvermicc
fuck he did...he canceled the constellation program for sure now and thats it. I really liked him but thats it now 4 me- I cant support somebody who is so shortsighted.
Shifting space to private company´s will cost lives...thats a fact in my eyes.
stevehislop 1 year ago
they will not go to the moon again cuz..they see something up there..like life aliens or something..thats why ...
juanferca 1 year ago
@juanferca they went up another 6 times after this, and nasa is talkn bout doin it again with the president
MrSquelcher 1 year ago
@MrSquelcher hOO!OO!O! thanks a get it :)
juanferca 1 year ago
Those who do not believe in reality are afraid to face the fact, this was our shining moment, screw the IDIOTS!
kerryfox 1 year ago 3
The musicalization is a film terrorific
20rewind09 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
aulis dot com/jackstudies_4.html
Do u believe a lem like that actually landed on the moon genius. That's where that pic was supposed to be from-NASA
cadu1995 1 year ago
ed 11561: hey tell me this. how do you explain moonrocks? Yeah we didn't go to the moon...It's fuck heads like you who have no idea what your talking about. Pull your dildo out of your ass and shut the fuck up. You know nothing about anything
theproducerspart2 1 year ago
@theproducerspart2 lol fuck you asshole
aulis dot com/jackstudies_4.html
Do u believe a lem like that actually landed on the moon genius. That's where that pic was supposed to be from-NASA.
cadu1995 1 year ago
@cadu1995 PLEASE EXPLAIN THE LUNAR RANGING EXPERIMENT.
brianwilson49 1 year ago
@brianwilson49 Why the fuck r u stupid enough to as me anything asshole.Only nasa knows the truth.lol Go ask them -& make sure u parrot what they say word for word. lol
cadu1995 1 year ago
@cadu1995 "Why the fuck r u stupid enough to as me anything asshole."
i cant fault you there. you clearly know very little, but what is slightly sadder is that you seem very unprepared to expand your thinking and leave behind your 'flat earth' style knee jerk reactions.
brianwilson49 1 year ago
@brianwilson49 Why the fuck r u stupid enough to as me anything asshole.
FORGIVE ME ASSHOLE I SKIPPED A "K" But i'll bet u know what i was saying douchebaby. lol
cadu1995 1 year ago
@cadu1995 how very eloquently put. clearly you think that your retarded anger compensates for something as important as FACTS and EVIDENCE.
but no. shouting and conjecture for you. suit yourself 'doucheboy' LOL
brianwilson49 1 year ago
@brianwilson49 Did you name yourself after the psychotic-paranoid-schizophrenic Beachboy faggot? LOL Must have because u r deluded beyond all comprehension.
ps-we STILL can't go to the moon u dumb fuck.lol
cadu1995 1 year ago
@cadu1995 I'm afraid we can and we did.
brianwilson49 1 year ago
@brianwilson49 You're AFRAID?
lol we never went to any moon.
ed11561 1 year ago
@ed11561 yes - i am afraid.
i'm afraid for you.
i'm afraid that you are incapable on handling the truth.
its a brave new world with new frontiers opened up by the achievements of the apollo program.
take the tin foil off your head ad open the curtains. its a beautiful universe.
brianwilson49 1 year ago 3
@brianwilson49 i'M AFRAID OF Assholes with Beach Boys names as utube pages call signs. lol U wouldn't know the truth if it was shoved down your throat.
ed11561 1 year ago
@ed11561 tis usually the way that when the argument is lost the insults fly.
brianwilson49 1 year ago
@cadu1995 tis usually the way that when the argument is lost the insults fly.
brianwilson49 1 year ago
@brianwilson49 watch?v=SeQ46eqgypM&feature=related
cadu1995 1 year ago
1:40 To extract the LM from the 3rd stage of the launch vehicle???? I would really like to know how this phoney shit was done. LOL Lies & more lies.
ed11561 1 year ago
In a episode the mythbusters comprobe that THIS IS REAL
IS TRUE
fedeplancha 1 year ago
This was as real as it gets.
SZSearcher 1 year ago
Heb er snachts om 4 uur ned tijd naar gekeken je zag er niet veel van omdat de beeldkwalietijt toen nog niet zo goed was Niel Armstrong was niet meer dan een vage witte schim ik was toe 11 jaar
evdweyde 2 years ago
É preciso ser cientista para acreditar nos alunizagens e é preciso acrecitar nas alunizagens para ser cientista.
Não sou cientista, então posso naturalmente acreditar ou não, depende apenas dos meus conhecimentos, diferentemente de cientistas que dependem totalmente de informações e conclusões de terçeiros.
zilumovel 2 years ago
watch?v=iZ3wh2cjekE
"Moon Rising"
Please Share with everybody.... Thank you!
777equals666 2 years ago
What an achievement this was....just one thing though. How did the astronauts feel when they went so close but yet so far. I mean the thickness of their gloves away from actually touching the moon! It must have been so fustrating....or maybe that's just me. I guess that is one of the next challenges. For man to truly walk on the moon.
MATNJAN1 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
They never went to the moon. The evidence of a hoax is crushing. Do YouTube searches on "Moonfaker" and "Apollo 15 flag waving". Do a Google Video search on "What happened on the Moon".
Cosmored 2 years ago
please, dont bother me with your tiresome videos and stop sending mails to my inbox. you fucking freak.
thankyou.
brianwilson49 2 years ago
why is it everytime i wanna look at some amazing footage of the US space program, i have to suffer the demented dribbling rants of some social inadequates raging on about how it was hoaxed?
get a grib of yourselves - there is no evidence whatsoever to conclude that it was faked. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER apart from some inane freaks trying to make out they know more about science and technology that 400,000 very talented and committed people involved in the space program.capiche?freaks.
brianwilson49 2 years ago 60
user/HeyTheGigIsUp
natruto 2 years ago
Well played sir, I am sick of those people to and you could not have said it better.
Pilotsjs 2 years ago
@brianwilson49 There is TONS of evidence that apollo was faked.From their wire walking on the moon to the fake photo shoots & Million dollar moon globes complete with camera tracks to "capture" the moon landings. I guess some people r still just lemmings & sheep who believe everything-no matter how stupid or far-fetched it is.lol
ed11561 1 year ago
@ed11561 TONS of evidence you say?
a ton of crap is still a ton of crap.
if you could show me a gram of evidence then i'd be prepared to listen. and please dont send me 800 links to loads of 3rd rate poorly presented and researched new age freak sites, designed for people who go around the place wearing bacofoil on their head.
just a gram of evidence please.
now, lets start with the lunar ranging experiment shall we?
brianwilson49 1 year ago
@brianwilson49 NO-let's start with a simple picture of a LEM on the moon. lol
aulis dot com/jackstudies_4.html
Do u believe a lem like that actually landed on the moon genius. That's where that pic was supposed to be from-NASA.
cadu1995 1 year ago
@cadu1995
LMFAO just looking at the pix of the apparent 'different accoutrements' being worn by buzz. these retards know nothing about how aperture settings on cameras has to be used to compensate for the amount of light on front of an object compared to the amount of light behind it.
there's good science (NASA) and bad science (retarded bacofoil social inadequate's ill informed websites)
please do not waste our time with any more of this crap.
brianwilson49 1 year ago
@brianwilson49 Have no idea what u r talking about now but who cares? Not me.
As for wasting "OUR TIME"? ARE YOU THE ENTIRE UTUBE AUDIENCE ASSHOLE?
IS THIS YOUR SITE BITCHBOY? go fuck yourself asshole.your comments suck anyway. they don't prove anything. KAGUYA-LOL LMFAO moron.
BTW u never sent me that clip????
cadu1995 1 year ago
@cadu1995 i think the intellectual nature of this response rather proves my point.
brianwilson49 1 year ago
@cadu1995 what amazes me about you lot is how NASA would have spent billions on supposedly trying to fool the entirety of humanity for ever, and yet would have forgotten something as basic as giving buzz the same pair of gloves in different pictures.
the hoax theories dont add up, kay? they dont add up in terms of common sense, or in terms of science. if they did, why wouldnt every scientist in the world have noticed by now?
oh yeah, i forgot. its a conspiracy and they're all in on it.
lol
brianwilson49 1 year ago
@brianwilson49 @brianwilson49 Every scientist in the world doesn't really give a fuck about nasa or apollo or anyting but their own job & theme of experiments. U assholes think that every scientist just sat down & feverishly tried to debunk the supposed moon landings?
NOT AT ALL. They said Oh Really? Great work-PERIOD-they didn't even THINK to discuss it in 1969 when everyone knew AMERICA WAS GREAT & they beat the nasty RUSSIANS.-the ugly dogs of russia.
cadu1995 1 year ago
@cadu1995 not every scientist cares about nasa you say? thats interesting, because it is mainly due to our exploration of space (with nasa at the forefront) that has enlightened so much of the scientific world over the last 5 decades or so.
brianwilson49 1 year ago
@brianwilson49 BTW show me a film of the CM turning completely around & pulling the LEM out of its ass-docking up with the LEM-and having the 2 astro-nots crawl into the lem & then having it blast off to the moon.IMFUCKENPOSSIBLE. lol
cadu1995 2 days ago I'M WAITING DUMMY
cadu1995 6 days ago
STILL WAITING ASSHOLE. 6 DAYS DOUCHEBOY.
cadu1995 1 year ago
@cadu1995 oh yea, let me just skip merrily off to my library of nasa footage......LOL
tell you what, i'll rent out a hangar in the desert and make my own footage, hey! it must be easy right?
LOL
brianwilson49 1 year ago
@brianwilson49 watch?v=ngCCA9D25wg&feature=related
NO GO TO THE NEVADA MOON YOURSELF & CREATE A MOONSET DIPSHIT. lol
cadu1995 1 year ago
@cadu1995 yeh. sounds easy. why not have a go yourself?
brianwilson49 1 year ago
@brianwilson49 Can you think in more than 1 sentence nonsense at 1 time moron?
Does EVERY comment you make mean NOTHING? LOL loser
cadu1995 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@brianwilson49 @brianwilson49 i'M AFRAID OF Assholes with Beach Boys names as utube pages call signs. lol U wouldn't know the truth if it was shoved down your throat.
LOL LMFAO
cadu1995 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@brianwilson49 aulis dot com/jackstudies_4.html
Do u believe a lem like that actually landed on the moon genius. That's where that pic was supposed to be from-NASA.
cadu1995 1 year ago
@brianwilson49 BTW show me a film of the CM turning completely around & pulling the LEM out of its ass-docking up with the LEM-and having the 2 astro-nots crawl into the lem & then having it blast off to the moon.IMFUCKENPOSSIBLE. lol
cadu1995 1 year ago
@cadu1995
Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawn. Oh I'm sorry were trying to pick a fight on the internet, I'm sorry.
theproducerspart2 1 year ago
@brianwilson49 BTW show me a film of the CM turning completely around & pulling the LEM out of its ass-docking up with the LEM-and having the 2 astro-nots crawl into the lem & then having it blast off to the moon.IMFUCKENPOSSIBLE. lol
cadu1995 2 days ago I'M WAITING DUMMY
cadu1995 1 year ago
there is more evidence that we did go to the moon than it was faked there is a episode of mythbusters about that
jason66801 1 year ago
@jason66801 correct. and the evidence is based on sound scientific fact, rather than half baked ideas about different items of clothing in different photographs LOL.
the one that REALLY gets me is "but there are no stars in the pictures from the lunar surface". AAAAAAAAH! fucking retards!!
anyway, it makes for humorous reading.
brianwilson49 1 year ago
@brianwilson49 you said you wanted to look at the footage. not comments. so enjoy the footage and ignore the comments then. people are free to say wat they think
lighterinthestorm 1 year ago
@lighterinthestorm why are you reading them then? just ignore them. they are as free to say what they like as i am.
brianwilson49 1 year ago
@brian wilson 49 you have nothing to complain about if your right. what you cant stand is all the errors pointed to you. you cant just ignore them oh no you have to defend NASA with your dying breath. even this statement requires no response but oh no here we go right.
datzfast 1 year ago
@datzfast the 'errors' pointed out are conjecture unsubstantiated by any FACT! i', not defending NASA - if you can simply show me one FACT that PROVES we never went to the moon then i will change my opinion. i have seen MANY hoax theory videos and NONE of them provide HARD FACTS.
i simply say this - if we never went to the moon how to you explain the LLR experiment and the substantial data it has recorded over the last 40 odd years?
brianwilson49 1 year ago
@brianwilson49 llr luner lander rover wasnt an experiment.
datzfast 1 year ago
@datzfast LLR is nothing to do with cars.
Lunar Laser Ranging experiment. one of the first carried out by apollo 11. it has provided a huge amount of data about the moon's trajectory around the earth, and much more. how can this POSSIBLY be faked?
brianwilson49 11 months ago
@brianwilson49 shocking isnt it
datzfast 11 months ago
@brianwilson49
capiche? what is that?
moromic 1 year ago
@moromic Italo-American dialect of capisci
brianwilson49 1 year ago
@brianwilson49 People could use the same rationale for God, and irrational belief in a sky-monkey.
jimmybilbo 11 months ago
jejejejejej gringos 70 doble hijueputas malparidos
EDIERKOOL 2 years ago
The only fake in the apollo story was President Nixon who was up to no good even at this time into his presidency.
If the entire Apollo mission was a fraud what was the point in launching all those Saturn V knowing full well Russia were not quite ready in landing a cosmonaugt on to the moon.
It was only a matter of time before either America or Russia landed on the moon.
with over four pre moon saturn V launches it was Apollo 11 that finally got there.
Like it or not it happened
llandudnoboy 2 years ago 3
Nixon axed the NASA budget in 1970. Think how far ahead we'd be if NASA had cart-blance like in the 1960s. We'd have hotels on the moon and Mars by now.
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
it have subliminal massages ond it is fake no stars it was film near area 51 my english suks
vovavolkvova 2 years ago
yes it writes in one serbian magazine like you said
globalnine 2 years ago
Your understanding of science also "suks".
fifiragdoll 2 years ago
I imagine ye of small mind, you think Apollo 13 was fake also. I suppose you think NASA intentionally blew up the SM oxygen tanks to increase their TV ratings.
BoOiMeOi 2 years ago
LOL
SeaTownTrouT 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
F A K E
F A K E
F A K E
F A K E
mcezar 2 years ago
man, open your mind.
RiotYourFeelings 2 years ago
Comment removed
llandudnoboy 2 years ago
you
suck
suck
suck.
ftutbs 2 years ago
this woulfd be real....but i want you to see a video that claims programm apollo 11 and nil never step to the moon.......!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
astronomyb0y 2 years ago
no stars = that tells everything
ThoughCriminal912 2 years ago
The cameras that they used were shit = that tells everything
RiotYourFeelings 2 years ago
@ThoughCriminal912
It only "tells everything" about the fact that you know nothing about how cameras work.
Scientior 2 years ago
@ThoughCriminal912 Please sir...how can that comment make any sense???
lotanerve 1 year ago
Dear All,
I have some questions about sociology and psychology:
(3) Why do we love travelling to space?
(2) Why do we have a perception that space is closer related with America as well as Americans' culture and values?
(3) Why do we think that space exploration is benefitical to man kind despite the huge financial expense?
THANK YOU IN ADVANCE for your creative ideas and brainstorm!!! :)
applesweeter 2 years ago
because because because majority rules duhhh
EGMAG 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is gonna blow you away. Never pay for another UFC fight again. They even have shows like Weeds, True Blood, and Hung. You have to take a peek at freetvfeeds. com
730349
luckylotteryz 2 years ago
fak or not fak we got something to watch but nasa can give money to poor countries
motayyab 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Now THIS is cool. All your favorite TV shows on one website - for free. Behold: freetvfeeds. com
413360
lucklady666 2 years ago
Look up Project Contellation and educate yourself a little before commenting again.
Deke101 2 years ago
To look at it in a funny way. "Well here we are..aaah....ummm...aaaah...gee there's really nothing here but sand and rocks, lets go home Buzz."
vxenon67 2 years ago
The greatest adventure of all time.
vxenon67 2 years ago 2
after raiders of the lost arc obviously.
rcisthedriver 2 years ago
Hi
ok radiation is a very good argument! but look at the later lives of the Apollo astronauts, most of them have or had cancer! if the moon landing was a hoax why are there so many prooves for it?
it was a clear goal to land on the lunar surface before the russian do, and noone was interested in radiation (look at the first Atomic bomb tests!)
Niederbayerncoustoms 2 years ago
nice
innocentbutcher41 2 years ago
(1) Herbert Friedman, in his book "Sun and Earth," describes Van Allen's global survey of cosmic-ray intensity: "The results from Explorer I, launched on January 31, 1958, were so puzzling that instrument malfunction was suspected. High levels of radiation intensity appeared interspersed with dead gaps ... Explorer III succeeded fully, and most important, it carried a tape recorder. Simulation tests with intense X rays in the laboratory showed that the dead gaps
procommenter 2 years ago
(2) represented periods when the Geiger counter in space had been choked by radiation of intensities a thousand times greater than the instrument was designed to detect. As Van Allen's colleague Ernie Ray exclaimed in disbelief: 'All space must be radioactive!'." Herbert Friedman later explains that "Of all the energy brought to the magnetosphere by the solar wind, only about 0.1 percent manages to cross the magnetic barrier."
procommenter 2 years ago
fake movie and pictures for me to,,,
bonzai2007 2 years ago
Hi guys
first of all, the best proove of the moon landing is that the russian and the france whatched the Americans on moon ( there was cold war, and if the moon landing was a hoax the russian would have complained about!) It's very easy to land on a planet which has 1/6 gravity of the earth! and the way to moon and back was calculated by Isac Newton years before.... So where`s the problem?
Niederbayerncoustoms 2 years ago
Isaac* I believe, and that is a good point, but I'm wondering, why haven't we been back?
xHypnotix 2 years ago
Because it costs a fucking fortune.
There's a plan in place right now to go back to the moon, which Obama may have to cancel or at least postpone, because you just can't get away with splashing that many tax dollars on NASA any more. Even in the 60s, when space travel really captured the public's imagination, the high price of the Apollo program was controversial.
fifiragdoll 2 years ago
Yeah, so let's all sit here on Earth and allow financial holdups to limit our exploration of the unknown. Man... whatever happened to the concept of progress?
seanwills77 2 years ago 2
I agree.
fifiragdoll 2 years ago
Professor John Searl's HORIZONTAL flight vehicle of which 41 were built and flown(unmanned) from 1952-1978, is a fuelless drive concept, at a cost vast sums below NASA and the Russians and Space Agency's VERTICAL fuel-burning concept. Search: SEG, and Swallowcommand. The work is being resurrected, acter decades of suppression. Have hope, help is on the way, courtesy of Brown, and Searl Effect Technology.
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
Starz dont realy egsist it a black doome with holls
UltraSuperGenius007 2 years ago
omg! you sir probably have theeee most annoying grammatic error on youtube.
nucklsandwich 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
HOAX believer groups. I hate to burst your bubble. The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) is a robotic spacecraft launched June 18, 2009 by NASA currently orbiting the Moon. The orbiting probe will be able to provide a 3-D map of the Moon's surface and has provided some of the first images of Apollo equipment left on the Moon.
DNDZOLLER 2 years ago
F A K E !
F A K E !
F A K E !
F A K E !
mcezar 2 years ago
how is it fake?
triathlon4ever 2 years ago
you are stupid... :)
kdc111190 2 years ago
celebrating 40th year anniversary of man on the moon
chapman1235 2 years ago
The 1960s was a boom in solid state electronics. i.e. transistor radios, compact TVs. The first touch screen computer I saw was in 1978 in the systems control room of a power company. It was used to open and close breakers for the line crews. All you young conspiracy theorists that think we where just a bunch of cavemen in the 60s and 70s. . . . In the 1970s my Honda Civic got 35 mpg. If we have advanced so much since then why are we still driving dinosaurs?
naspcola 2 years ago 2
Greed, and suppression of clean-cheap energy devices and systems, which you may research, and build yourself if you have the requiste skills. The energy-crisis is a hoax. The moon-landings were real, but given the assist of top=secret propulsion technologies that are non-ballistic.
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Beer makes you lean, muscular & sexually-alluring.
The moon has been explored by Apollo astro-actors.
procommenter 2 years ago
LOL o plz, nasa landed on the moon 4 times 40 yrs ago when tv's were still black and white? im sorry, i dont believe it, even today its almost freaking impossible to fix the restrooms in the space station.
if nasa had men on the moon 40 yrs ago, we should have been having a man on mars by now, reply and say "oh ur dumb we did land on the moon" i dont care what u say to me, now i see why this whole world is laughing at america
nokiafan4life 2 years ago
You grossly underestimate the technology they had in 1969.
pyrensyth 2 years ago
you're a very young person, I presume. believe it or not, we did have color tv's in the sixites and the last two moon landings were done in color.
about the space station, where do you think that technology came from? from all the work that those people did back in the sixites. The reason why we didn't continue going and beyond, was that IT GOT BORING!. People were losing interest in space travel
turnoutjim 2 years ago
International space station is just 220 miles from earth. Moon is 500,000 miles one way. I think you got my point
tauseef7219 2 years ago
that say they filmed this in a sand box in jersey
44altecz 2 years ago
The hoax theorists have no choice but to try and claim that the film was slowed down because of the way the regolith (soil) moves when the astronauts kick it. The film being slowed down is easily debunked. Note the arm movement. If the film was slowed down 50 percent like these hoax theorist claim then that means all the guys in the film are moving their arms so fast they make Bruce Lee look like a couch potato. LOL
naspcola 2 years ago 2
Nice movie we in waiting for "Moon Landing 2" staring terminator robocop and spider man (maybe only they can survive the expedition to moon!
nonametoshow 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WHITE MEN PUT US ON THE MOON. Thank a White man today!
johnnyharpe 2 years ago