Dogs in America can do anything if they have the cash -- who knew? In the USSR dogs had to do what they were told, only eat what they were given -- but in America a dog could be somebody! America ROKS! Also the Soviets knew what a Cadillac was? I have no idea what the Soviet cars of the day were. I do know what a Yugo is and it was awful and it too came from communism, but to be fair that's compared to the 2 Cadillac's I've owned in my life. #woofwoofdogpound
Hello, I am a tourist from USSR. But not the USSR you know. I am from USSR from a parallel universe 15 degrees par-time from your universe. U'll know what that means in a couple of years :) In our universe communist worked, and the communist nations became prosperous and flourishing. Capitalism failed, and US broke up into 13 different independent zones, as they like to call them. I wanted to see what the world would be like with US as the super power. Paid a lot of Rubels for this trip too :)
In soviet Russia, only the government class had the wealth. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. I'd rather the power be with the people than the government.
Yes, Only the state can make everything better. Just ask the millions that died under Stalin. Thanks for the upload. These were worth preserving if only to demonstrate just how full of Shit the leftist were... and are.
@jamo387 Tens of millions in the USSR along with tens of millions in China under Mao. For some real comedy go read about Mao's war on Sparrows -- it really happened and millions really died because of it.
@DarthKieduss43 bulldog get's tons of money. Get's corrupted, Get's offices, throws wasteful parties, pees on officers who leaves him alone cause he is rich. Basically Soviets were saying is that everyone in the higher up capitalist system was corrupt, war mongering, and facists (you saw the heil hitler sign)
The Soviets were a really peaceful people invading Afghanistan(like us) for imperialist expansion to a warm water port(not like us) and sending its KGB members around the world, fighting America in the air and sending war supplies to America's enemies. So when the part with the bankers barking at the protesters how want peace, remember the people that made this video. I will admit we are not the most peaceful people but I think the Soviets were worse.
@saynotocommunism1 Are you kidding? The same Americans who stationed nuclear weapons in Turkey "Just in case" and instigated the Cuban missile crisis? Do you know anything about Vietnam? or what the U.S. WANTED to do during the Korean war? probably not so i'll cut to the chase; They wanted to push through North Korea and invade China and instigate war with the soviets simply based on the "Domino Theory" which proved false. Do some research please before you form an opinion...
@PaceBreaker23 I was just saying that the Soviets are not peaceful, notice I did say that America did invade Afghanistan but not to get a warm water port. I agree we Americans are not peaceful, we have had lots of wars for expansion and Imperialism but I just think that the Soviets should not lecture about how American's are so warmongering because live by example. By the way I do know what MacArthur wanted to do during Korea, but he was relived from duty because of it.
@Mrpastry909 A deep thinking on that reveals the true: Only a few has a yacht and a mansion... so, maybe the communist is correct... I think the correct communism will provide to all of us a yacht and a mansion.
If that's so, why did the Soviet government rob the people of all of their wealth? That any extra money was seized by the Soviet authorities? It kept everybody equal, all right-equally poor.
@Mrpastry909 I was thinking... if everybody has a yacht and a mansion, that's communism, not capitalism. Answering to you question, communism was bad implemented, Marx and Engels told that the revolution must come on a industrialized country. That never happened. And Stalin didn't helped. That's all.
It is very important, a dog barking on the protesters out of the window resemble those fat cats who watched and laughed from the balcony on the protest action, "Wall Street grasp"
@ZillaRocks nope i don't think so :- > ..f.e. molotov left only 100 rubles after his death.... and none of them had nothing in property ...everything they had belonged to the state (the car,the office etc) and after their retirement everything was going back to the state
It goes to show you don't need a large economy to be a superpower. Soviet Russia had an economy the size of Illinois. I detest the neo cons who say China won't be a superpower because they don't have a large enough economy.
Plenty of intelligent people got ahead in the U.S. At least in America we have the ability to make money, the government does set our wages. Not to mention the gulags, lack of ALL civil liberties, and secret police of the Soviet model. No thanks.
@zfan2591 Yeah, You are perfectly right! USA gives much more freedom to each one, the main force concists inside of your democracy system сapable to lead that politicy. But, you know, it sounds a bit fondly to hear that citizens of USA are not under your "secret police")) Simple they operate much more softer and skillful that majority can't feel how it's reflected on their life.. So, my low bow to american special services:)
Это скорее про нашу нынешнюю власть, когда дети чинушь и миллиардеров не имея ничего в голове занимают высокие посты, советская пропаганда предсказывала будущее... Сравнивать с болонкой не стоит... Хороший мульт
Болонка Беда была главной наследницей Леоны Хелмсли. Брат миллиардерши получил на два миллиона меньше, чем болонка. Внукам Хелмсли было завещано по пять миллионов при соблюдении ими ряда условий. Двоих своих внуков Леона Хемлсли вообще не включила в завещание, однако позже им удалось отсудить по шесть миллионов.
В США скончалась белая болонка по кличке Беда (Trouble), унаследовавшая по смерти своей хозяйки, эксцентричной миллиардерши Леоны Хелмсли (Leona Helmsley),12 миллионов долларов, сообщает в четверг, 9 июня, New York Daily News.
My point is that countries that attempt to implement communism always end up with lower standards of living than those that move towards capitalism. The reason there is poverty in the inner cities is government controls (such as welfare and minimum wage). The less barriers that government places on entry into a marketplace, the more competition, and the less power large businesses have on the market. More government control creates more corruption. Can you prove otherwise?
@AlexAvet53 Coming from the country that killed millions of people during the government confiscation of grain from agriculture (twice), and the Gulags, yeah...great country. I would like to quote Milton Friedman, for you, "Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself."
@AlexAvet53 You statement implies that there was private property, which is against communist ideas, since all property is owned by the state.
"Everyone lives with what they have." -> I suppose meaning that you get what you need from the government, and forget about what you want. Why is it good to take away a person's right to choose?
Your example of medical care is absurd. You don't get to decide which hospital you go to, or what doctor you can see. Maybe your mom should have aborted you...
Rockefeller-> Spelman College, The Rockefeller Institute, etc. (see wikipedia article)
John Sealy-> John Sealy Hospital
Carnegie-> created the NY Public Library system (which were all free)
In fact the time period was so prosperous, people kept immigrating because there was more opportunity in the U.S. than in their own countries. Governments oppress people, not business, especially in a true free market. Look at China, North Korea, Cuba, and the former USSR.
@heavym3tal Carnegie didnt found the NYPL, Samuel Tilden did. Spelman college is a private institute and unavailable to many working class citizens, the Rockefeller institute, while providing to good causes, only redresses minor social issues. Also, America wasnt prosperous, the rich were, and many immigrants were cheated, working conditions and rates were terrible, and discrimination was rampant. The land of the free was only free for some, the rich, and the rich alone.
@VympelMarine We are actually both wrong. At the time of Tilden's death, there were two libraries in NYC. They were the Lenox Library, and Astor Library (after J.J. Astor, the 1st U.S. Millionare). Tilden willed his fortune (which means he was, as you would say, part of the bourgeoisie) to create the NYPL system, but it took funding from Carnegie to open additional branches throughout the city. Carnegie also opened a free library in his home country of scotland. Oppressors? Think not.
@VympelMarine Spleman College is a is a four-year liberal arts women's college (which is 91% African American), so tell me how it is unavailable to working class citizens? You didn't mention how the Rockefeller Institute was able to advance medical science, such that the Rockefeller Sanitary Commission eradicated hookworm disease. The government didn't do that.
@heavym3tal Spieman is a private college (racial denominations dont matter), and the Rockefeller institute only lessened the awful social conditions of the worker, yet even in the Rockefeller archives where you took that "fact", it never lists them ending the disease. The federal govt. protects our rights and is an ever watchful protector of the worker, Private business doesnt do that.
@VympelMarine And your going to tell me that 1000s of immigrants came to the United States because the conditions here were worse than were they came from? That is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard. You say the the conditions were terrible...easy to make the comparison when you live in the 21st century with indoor plumbing and electricity. Tell me what they were fleeing their home countries from, and why they decided to stay in the U.S.
@heavym3tal My family moved from Tsarist Russia to escape to a place where they thought their opinions and votes would matter, they were communists, and being foreigners they were suppressed, but were trapped here due to lack of money because of awful wages and conditions. They thought they would have their rights as citizens, and the capitalists spit on their rights.
@heavym3tal To Shitsney? The company that bastardised every European folk tale there is into some soapy yankee happy-end version? I think the Shitsney board of directors should be executed on some main square for their crimes, to start with.
@SovietWarrior The thing about free speech is that you can tell any story however you want. If you don't like the way Disney does animation, don't watch their movies, or compete with them.
Oh. :). It's just a joke. It's a common joke. When someone says "x does y" in a context implying the USSR or Russia you revert it and say : " In Soviet Union y does x" or "y does you" etc. I think it's a satire of the omnipotence of the Soviet totalitarian state and the threat of use of force against dissidents.
@heavym3tal In the first place, its not arguing that they arent crooked, but that the US was (and the Americans were extremely crooked), and that in the US, money can buy you anything.
@VympelMarine Corruption became more prevalent in the U.S. because the government expanded its power, and began trying to regulate the free market. Do you honestly think there is less corruption in the former soviet union?
@heavym3tal Perhaps corruption expanded. but it expands with business ( Free Market). The most prosperous times in human history were during Reagan ( When regulation was expanded and taxes raised), during the 50s, increased government control, and this seems prevalent whenever there is an even redistribution of wealth to reinvest in the economy.
@VympelMarine I don't know where you get your facts from, but the most prosperous time in U.S. history was 1870-1900. In fact, the richest Americans (Rockefeller, Carnegie, Vanderbilt, etc.), who had large companies, were the biggest philanthropists. They built schools, non-profit hospitals, libraries, etc. with their own money for everyone. In fact, the wealthiest Americans today, are also the largest donors to charities. When government regulates business, corruption increases.
@heavym3tal You say that era was the most prosperous, but throughout that era, these capitalists built their empires and monopolies off of the oppression of the working class, they controlled the government up till FDR, they controlled the congress, and they did whatever they pleased. Tell me one school, one non profit hospital, one library they founded. They built educational institutes for the higher echelons of business. Give one thing that the Obama Administration has done that was corrupt
@VympelMarine Oh, and in regard to the Obama Administration's corruption: 1) TARP, which went to bailout companies, 2) Americans Affordable Healthcare, which Unions and certain people can get waivers for, 3) Subsidies for "Green Energy", which go against true capitalism, 4) No Oil drilling permits to U.S. oil companies, but issuing such permits to Petrobras (a Brazilian oil company).
I can list more, if you want. Besides, FDR was no saint, he was a racist (locked up lots of Japanese).
@heavym3tal Without the bailouts, the companies would have failed, and the economy would sink lower, Affordable Healthcare is guaranteed to all citizens equally, Green energy assists production, social and working conditions. Petrobras has only a very small operation here in comparison to Chevron, Shell, Exxonmobil, ConocoPhillips who all have major contracts here but produce overseas to reduce costs. Business in America is corrupt, the republican party is corrupt, the right is corrupt.
@VympelMarine Let me give you a free lesson in the free market. If you make a product that people do not like, your company fails, not to mention that the Democrats had a majority in congress. The healthcare bill is so great that unions and politicians have waviers that state that they are exempt from the law (still no corruption?). Lastly, competition is essential to the free market. That means no subsidies, and no special treatment. Petrobras's permits & green energy subsidies = corruption.
@heavym3tal Except that when the democrats held congress, the economy started improving, there is equal treatment in a universal healthcare system compared to the biased and slanted private system, and the U.S. govt. does not give subsidies to Petrobras, They do give taxcuts to the rich, to the oil companies, to the banks, who by the way were used quite often for their services contrary to what you said above. Govt. investment into R@D is not corruption but scientific progress. Capitalism fails.
@VympelMarine I think you forgot to mention that there is more deaths and unequal treatment in a universal healthcare system (Cuba is a perfect example). I never said the the U.S. govt gives subsidies to Petrobras, I said that they are giving permits to them, while denying permits to the other oil companies. Govt. subsidies give an unfair advantage in the free market, as well as regulations like "Cap and Trade" and the C.A.F.E standards.
@heavym3tal the U.S. govt. does not give out permits as the areas mined are purchased on a private market, and cap and trade and the C.A.F.E. standards provide incentives to reducing green house gases
@VympelMarine In capitalism, technologies have to compete against each other, and whichever has the best and least expensive product wins. When the govt. takes my tax dollars, and spends it on a product that I don't like, how does that help me? Answer: It doesn't! All it does is increase corruption since companies participating in that market get a payment from the federal government, at my expense.
@heavym3tal I am well aware, but conservatives in America support cutting federal support to social programs, but believe that subsidies to companies should be maintained. also, it is not your responsibility to decide what the govt. spends on as it supports what is necessary not what is most popular. It is fair distribution of wealth based on necessity.
@VympelMarine Don't get me wrong, I don't support any kind of subsidies (green or otherwise), and yes many republicans do support farm subsidies. But both parties are part of a political machine that will end, as was shown in the 2010 election when many freshmen (mostly tea partiers) came in. If they do what they are supposed to do, they will stay, otherwise they will be thrown out of office like yesterday's garbage.
@heavym3tal The American public is generally uneducated about economics and politics and learns most of what they know from ideologically and politically slanted groups like private industry, the republicans and the tea party, FOX news, and other conservative groups. I understand your wanting subsidies to end, but I want private industry abolished entirely
@VympelMarine I would like to ask how it is not my responsibility to decide what the govt. spends my taxes on? The main principle of the U.S. is that it is governed by the consent of the people, through elected representatives. But can you show me how a fair distribution of wealth is good? How does that cause companies to compete against each other?
@heavym3tal You elect representatives to decide the budget first, and second, putting money into what is popular would cause companies that are less popular to fail, hurting the economy. Fair distribution of wealth ensures equal treatment, and growing smaller companies till they are able to compete on the international market.
@VympelMarine You say that you want to abolish private industry, yet you defend the bailouts of the companies. You say your family moved from Tsarist Russia because they were suppressed, but they wanted to go back once they got here? You say that the American public is generally uneducated about economics and politics (and I assume you are "educated", if so explain), but you get your ideaology and political views from groups like communists, socialists, MSNBC, etc.
@heavym3tal I am simply defending reforms in America as they are a small step towards a socialist economy. My family, as communists, thought that free speech would help them voice their ideas here, but they could not, and they were not free. American conservatives and liberals only listen to slanted news like FOX and Msnbc, i however look at both sides, read arguments and access outcomes, and this has led me to accepting a communist point of view. I watch MSNBC bit i dont believe everything said
@VympelMarine I watch Fox News, and I disagree with some of the viewpoints there as well. I can only look to historical examples of the implementation of communism and capitalism for evidence. In every instance, governments that instituted communism ended up with poverty and less freedom, while every country that shifts toward a free market has higher standards of living and generally more freedoms.
@heavym3tal Historical references on communism are deficient because instead of displaying characteristics of communism, they display state capitalism, concentration of resources in state hands without redistributing it to the people. Free market nations do not have a higher standard of living, as many live in poverty in cities, there is a much higher crime rate, Govt. are corrupt, businesses hold too much power, and working and social conditions are deplorable.
@VympelMarine My point is that countries that attempt to implement communism always end up with lower standards of living than those that move towards capitalism. The reason there is poverty in the inner cities is government controls (such as welfare and minimum wage). The less barriers that government places on entry into a marketplace, the more competition, and the less power large businesses have on the market. More government control creates more corruption. Can you prove otherwise?
@Jsmith858522 Thanks, but facts are facts, and I have seen both sides of the argument. I encourage you (if you haven't already) to study both communist and capitalist theory, and the histories of each. I believe in freedom, personal responsibility, and the unalienable rights of man (<--including women). BTW, sorry if I got on my soapbox.
This film is pretty good propaganda bacause it's NOT that false, comparing rich Americans to greedy bull dog is actually pretty funny... I would still rather live in the US than in the USSR any day.
@SovietWarrior You really believe that? You should read a history book(s) about the USSR. Besides this "Land of the Free Idiots" gave the world some of the greatest humanitarians and scientists in the history of mankind. Any from the USSR, that weren't trying to escape?
I like the funny, Peanuts-esque sounds that the lawyer makes when he's speaking. That's probably exactly what spoken english sounds like to someone from a different culture.
In general that this cartoon film shows that in the USA some people do nothing and become millionaires, and they above the law and work while at them are money. In the USSR hated parasitism. There was such saying: "Who doesn't work, that doesn't eat". It's not propagation, it's political satire!
@bezplavok That is not the point of the American society. The main characteristics that everyone can become SOMEONE if he's clever and knows how to go through life, "from rags to riches". Sure there are parasites who only inherit the fortune from their ancestors, but saying that they form the core of the successful Americans is bullshit.
In the USSR was considered that if you from bottoms have reached top, you're the best. Look at politicians of the USSR, all were from bottoms. I didn't say that in the USA it was everywhere. But it was in the USA. In the USSR it wasn't and was despised.
@blasty137 You sure don't know much about the power structure in the Yankeestan. It's the same people that stole together their riches backin 19th century, that are still in power. Obama and his clowns are just like the sign hanging on the saloon. Change the sign every 4th year, but the interior is all the same.
One thing I find hilarous about communists are how they criticize capitalists who make good money for themselves and claim they have a perfectly "equal" society while leaders in Soviet Russia were more spoiled than any American buisnessman while the peasants died in the fields. The only people who favor communism are the poor who don't want to work to make money in a capitalist society.
Interesting to note, the Soviet ruling class had access to all the illustrated excesses that were withheld from the proletariat. This propaganda served a double purpose; an attack on the main adversary - the US - and a warning to any worker who wanted to have the same entitlements as the Soviet leaders.
This movie clearly show how even a fool who knows nothing about money, economy, politics etc. can become a high member in USA just because of the money. People ignore the fact he is a dog just because he has money and even dance with him and follow what he does and says even if it is idiotic, like the doggy dance. In short terms they say that in USA you are respected and honored as much as you have money...
@SovietWarrior I'd rather have Capitalism and Freedom than to have a Communist Peoples Republic where you can go to a gulag for criticising the government in power!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Notice also the thinly veiled racism in this cartoon. I'll explain. When the "rich people" dance they dance to Cuban or Afro-Cuban sounding music. Cuban and Afro style music is a legitimate folk music and in this cartoon they make it associate with bad rich frivolous people.
Haha, just like someone else in this thread said. Propaganda in USSR made it look like USSR was preventing people from being too rich. YET all the "leaders" and the elite people who controlled the government were extremeley rich, had dachas(summer houses) and lived in richest parts of Moscow (the oldest well taken care of buildings)
When the people had to stand in line for bread or toilet paper, the USSR government had everything! The only poor thing about them was their rhetoric
With the recent Supreme Court decision on corp. funding in the political arena, this cartoon is not far off of being reality...United States of Corporate America. as too the benefit of the right wing...at first?
man, this turned out to be a good propaganda! See: you could have fency big wheels, have butlers, expense suits, dance in clubs of living cities, get drunk, have some fun with some hot ass chicks... and in the end you freely vote for a dog to be a senator!
Yep, during USSR time, the people in government were all very rich. This was a perk of being in government, you get access to all the things normal people could not get.
stopfear - thanks for the support its UNReal how people still fall for this, a old Lady left her money to a BullDog! thats was their argument? WOW! even today Russians are doing Their OWN Propaganda (Not the Government) but Racists who Beat up ethnic groups & Upload on the internet. Have you seen any of that footage?
lol, dumb americans think that russian cartoon is propaganda))))
trupoed12 4 days ago
@trupoed12
LOL
maybe it's you who doesn't know what propaganda even is?????
I wonder what your beliefs are and what propaganda they are based on, because propaganda doesn't work if people KNOW it's propaganda.
Ian8505 1 day ago
Dogs in America can do anything if they have the cash -- who knew? In the USSR dogs had to do what they were told, only eat what they were given -- but in America a dog could be somebody! America ROKS! Also the Soviets knew what a Cadillac was? I have no idea what the Soviet cars of the day were. I do know what a Yugo is and it was awful and it too came from communism, but to be fair that's compared to the 2 Cadillac's I've owned in my life. #woofwoofdogpound
rodmunch2k 1 week ago
@TVZombie3000 seems legit
isuckatstarcraft96 1 week ago
Well I'd say that's a very good lesson: Don't give dogs money or they'll take over he world.
pickering86 1 week ago
I wonder how Soyuzmultfulm would react to Batman lol
FreeeeS 2 weeks ago
Hello, I am a tourist from USSR. But not the USSR you know. I am from USSR from a parallel universe 15 degrees par-time from your universe. U'll know what that means in a couple of years :) In our universe communist worked, and the communist nations became prosperous and flourishing. Capitalism failed, and US broke up into 13 different independent zones, as they like to call them. I wanted to see what the world would be like with US as the super power. Paid a lot of Rubels for this trip too :)
TVZombie3000 2 weeks ago
"If only you can get it."
So true...
AKArainkit 3 weeks ago
In soviet Russia, only the government class had the wealth. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. I'd rather the power be with the people than the government.
jamo387 3 weeks ago
Yes, Only the state can make everything better. Just ask the millions that died under Stalin. Thanks for the upload. These were worth preserving if only to demonstrate just how full of Shit the leftist were... and are.
jamo387 3 weeks ago
@jamo387 Tens of millions in the USSR along with tens of millions in China under Mao. For some real comedy go read about Mao's war on Sparrows -- it really happened and millions really died because of it.
rodmunch2k 1 week ago
@rodmunch2k I just looked it up. Sad. Mao was not too bright, just brutal. Have a good one !
jamo387 5 days ago
This is better animated than anime.
Spudgunable 1 month ago
This was 1963 and unfortunately it's more true today in America than even then. Our bought government and money grubbing industries. Fucking bankers.
ridewave444 1 month ago 7
So true
yichentohjoel 1 month ago 3
This is so true.
Voekov 1 month ago 2
My English soviets who were forced to live in a capitilest shit hole rise and destroy o ya джзч ТСЖ. Была дым овдчщвт бичом
lankton00 1 month ago
In soviet Russia the bulldog leaves you money!
1simo93521 2 months ago
03:19 trollface!
JackDrw 2 months ago
What the fuck? I didn't understand what this is supposed to mean
DarthKieduss43 2 months ago
@DarthKieduss43 bulldog get's tons of money. Get's corrupted, Get's offices, throws wasteful parties, pees on officers who leaves him alone cause he is rich. Basically Soviets were saying is that everyone in the higher up capitalist system was corrupt, war mongering, and facists (you saw the heil hitler sign)
130lukas 1 month ago 2
Безумная Cтаруха сделала плохое дело. Мы видим, как Kобель был развращен долларами. Я за доллары не распродажа!
SoldatLenina1917 2 months ago
So we're supposed to take lessons on peace from a dictatorship that slaughtered in excess of 20 million of its own people?
Bystander81 2 months ago
@Bystander81 imperialist pigdogs
TheCentralServices 2 months ago
The Soviets were a really peaceful people invading Afghanistan(like us) for imperialist expansion to a warm water port(not like us) and sending its KGB members around the world, fighting America in the air and sending war supplies to America's enemies. So when the part with the bankers barking at the protesters how want peace, remember the people that made this video. I will admit we are not the most peaceful people but I think the Soviets were worse.
saynotocommunism1 2 months ago
@saynotocommunism1 Are you kidding? The same Americans who stationed nuclear weapons in Turkey "Just in case" and instigated the Cuban missile crisis? Do you know anything about Vietnam? or what the U.S. WANTED to do during the Korean war? probably not so i'll cut to the chase; They wanted to push through North Korea and invade China and instigate war with the soviets simply based on the "Domino Theory" which proved false. Do some research please before you form an opinion...
PaceBreaker23 2 months ago in playlist Soviet Progaganda Animation Series
@PaceBreaker23 I was just saying that the Soviets are not peaceful, notice I did say that America did invade Afghanistan but not to get a warm water port. I agree we Americans are not peaceful, we have had lots of wars for expansion and Imperialism but I just think that the Soviets should not lecture about how American's are so warmongering because live by example. By the way I do know what MacArthur wanted to do during Korea, but he was relived from duty because of it.
saynotocommunism1 2 months ago
@saynotocommunism1 Большая Красная Армия была приглашена президентом Afganistan для защиты.
SoldatLenina1917 2 months ago
3:19 trollface
MrGoodspeedy 2 months ago
very good translation, even i couldnt translate it better... my english is not very good XD
grishashark 2 months ago
no wonder some many come to america if this is the propaganda i would LOVE to live on 5th avenue lol
xmasterfunk 3 months ago
A communist looks at someone's mansion and a yacht and says, "no one should have this much."
A capitalist looks at someone's mansion and a yacht and says, "everyone should have this much."
Mrpastry909 3 months ago
@Mrpastry909 A deep thinking on that reveals the true: Only a few has a yacht and a mansion... so, maybe the communist is correct... I think the correct communism will provide to all of us a yacht and a mansion.
mbcrra 3 months ago
@mbcrra
If that's so, why did the Soviet government rob the people of all of their wealth? That any extra money was seized by the Soviet authorities? It kept everybody equal, all right-equally poor.
Mrpastry909 3 months ago
@Mrpastry909 I was thinking... if everybody has a yacht and a mansion, that's communism, not capitalism. Answering to you question, communism was bad implemented, Marx and Engels told that the revolution must come on a industrialized country. That never happened. And Stalin didn't helped. That's all.
mbcrra 3 months ago
The Soviets response to Animal farm!
iownall12able 3 months ago
In the former Soviet Union you did not need to be rich to be drunk....
Cristinact 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Ronald Reagan Story! :D I'm a native born American from L.A., but that was so Devastatingly True! Bravo, Russians! :)
twiggypoopy 4 months ago
It is very important, a dog barking on the protesters out of the window resemble those fat cats who watched and laughed from the balcony on the protest action, "Wall Street grasp"
Sem1oN 4 months ago 9
it does not matter who you are is important as money you have
Excuse my bad English
htcZwop 4 months ago
Leona Helmsley left her dog $12 million dollars!
zzzaaayyynnn 4 months ago
thanks for loading and translating. fascinating stuff.
tomitstube 5 months ago 13
@tomitstube It is great, indeed. Now we can access these type of files, and that's just great
Cristinact 3 months ago
This happened with Leona Helmsley! No shit!
FreedomLover1973 5 months ago
That is true, dogs of rich have a better life when many people in world.
victorydayof91945 5 months ago
One wild-ass cartoon!
violinsane108 6 months ago
The communist leaders lived like this millionyer. But of course, that's not going to make it into propaganda broadcast to peasants...
ZillaRocks 6 months ago
@ZillaRocks nope i don't think so :- > ..f.e. molotov left only 100 rubles after his death.... and none of them had nothing in property ...everything they had belonged to the state (the car,the office etc) and after their retirement everything was going back to the state
balamaniac 4 months ago
@balamaniac My point being, the Soviet leaders lived quite comfortably, but the peasants did not.
ZillaRocks 4 months ago
@ZillaRocks nope....trust me....the peasants had good quality of life....i'm from there :- >
balamaniac 4 months ago
Okay, at first the animation quality put me off this short, but it was clever. Geisel himself would admit that.
aYankee102587 6 months ago
It goes to show you don't need a large economy to be a superpower. Soviet Russia had an economy the size of Illinois. I detest the neo cons who say China won't be a superpower because they don't have a large enough economy.
agumon12 6 months ago
wtf
kkmenon 6 months ago
I love this dog, is so cool, I want to be like him.
pisaza 6 months ago
Oprahs dogs gets 30 million $ when she dies.
tigerlovesrupert 7 months ago
Oprahs dogs get 30 million $ when she dies.
tigerlovesrupert 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You notice that in the end the dog ends up using the power of the State by becoming a Congressman to further his oppression over the masses.
Government, crony capitalism, democracy (whatever you want to call it), is force no matter were you find it.
yinzjagoffs 7 months ago
Comment removed
yinzjagoffs 7 months ago
Comment removed
yinzjagoffs 7 months ago
Comment removed
yinzjagoffs 7 months ago
Plenty of intelligent people got ahead in the U.S. At least in America we have the ability to make money, the government does set our wages. Not to mention the gulags, lack of ALL civil liberties, and secret police of the Soviet model. No thanks.
zfan2591 7 months ago
@zfan2591 Yeah, You are perfectly right! USA gives much more freedom to each one, the main force concists inside of your democracy system сapable to lead that politicy. But, you know, it sounds a bit fondly to hear that citizens of USA are not under your "secret police")) Simple they operate much more softer and skillful that majority can't feel how it's reflected on their life.. So, my low bow to american special services:)
advocatusdiaboli9 6 months ago
@advocatusdiaboli9 No, the polititions are simple puppets of the wealthy
SoldatLenina1917 5 months ago
@SoldatLenina1917 So what do you want to tell by that? If you don't agree with me say anything more significantly than that, OK?
advocatusdiaboli9 5 months ago
What idiot makes signature to these videos?
trupoed12 8 months ago
К чему тут возникают посты про болонку?
Это скорее про нашу нынешнюю власть, когда дети чинушь и миллиардеров не имея ничего в голове занимают высокие посты, советская пропаганда предсказывала будущее... Сравнивать с болонкой не стоит... Хороший мульт
LexPNZ 9 months ago
Propaganda? Hmmm... How about this one?
tinyurl(dot)com/4ytsoog
fotohunt 9 months ago
Болонка Беда была главной наследницей Леоны Хелмсли. Брат миллиардерши получил на два миллиона меньше, чем болонка. Внукам Хелмсли было завещано по пять миллионов при соблюдении ими ряда условий. Двоих своих внуков Леона Хемлсли вообще не включила в завещание, однако позже им удалось отсудить по шесть миллионов.
pilotivanovich 9 months ago
В США скончалась белая болонка по кличке Беда (Trouble), унаследовавшая по смерти своей хозяйки, эксцентричной миллиардерши Леоны Хелмсли (Leona Helmsley),12 миллионов долларов, сообщает в четверг, 9 июня, New York Daily News.
pilotivanovich 9 months ago
My point is that countries that attempt to implement communism always end up with lower standards of living than those that move towards capitalism. The reason there is poverty in the inner cities is government controls (such as welfare and minimum wage). The less barriers that government places on entry into a marketplace, the more competition, and the less power large businesses have on the market. More government control creates more corruption. Can you prove otherwise?
heavym3tal 9 months ago
Comment removed
AlexAvet53 8 months ago
@AlexAvet53 Coming from the country that killed millions of people during the government confiscation of grain from agriculture (twice), and the Gulags, yeah...great country. I would like to quote Milton Friedman, for you, "Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself."
heavym3tal 8 months ago
Comment removed
AlexAvet53 8 months ago
Comment removed
AlexAvet53 8 months ago
Comment removed
AlexAvet53 8 months ago
@AlexAvet53 You statement implies that there was private property, which is against communist ideas, since all property is owned by the state.
"Everyone lives with what they have." -> I suppose meaning that you get what you need from the government, and forget about what you want. Why is it good to take away a person's right to choose?
Your example of medical care is absurd. You don't get to decide which hospital you go to, or what doctor you can see. Maybe your mom should have aborted you...
heavym3tal 8 months ago
Comment removed
AlexAvet53 8 months ago
Comment removed
AlexAvet53 8 months ago
Comment removed
AlexAvet53 8 months ago
Comment removed
AlexAvet53 8 months ago
Comment removed
AlexAvet53 8 months ago
Comment removed
AlexAvet53 8 months ago
Comment removed
AlexAvet53 8 months ago
Comment removed
AlexAvet53 8 months ago
Rockefeller-> Spelman College, The Rockefeller Institute, etc. (see wikipedia article)
John Sealy-> John Sealy Hospital
Carnegie-> created the NY Public Library system (which were all free)
In fact the time period was so prosperous, people kept immigrating because there was more opportunity in the U.S. than in their own countries. Governments oppress people, not business, especially in a true free market. Look at China, North Korea, Cuba, and the former USSR.
heavym3tal 9 months ago
@heavym3tal Carnegie didnt found the NYPL, Samuel Tilden did. Spelman college is a private institute and unavailable to many working class citizens, the Rockefeller institute, while providing to good causes, only redresses minor social issues. Also, America wasnt prosperous, the rich were, and many immigrants were cheated, working conditions and rates were terrible, and discrimination was rampant. The land of the free was only free for some, the rich, and the rich alone.
VympelMarine 9 months ago
@VympelMarine We are actually both wrong. At the time of Tilden's death, there were two libraries in NYC. They were the Lenox Library, and Astor Library (after J.J. Astor, the 1st U.S. Millionare). Tilden willed his fortune (which means he was, as you would say, part of the bourgeoisie) to create the NYPL system, but it took funding from Carnegie to open additional branches throughout the city. Carnegie also opened a free library in his home country of scotland. Oppressors? Think not.
heavym3tal 9 months ago
@VympelMarine Spleman College is a is a four-year liberal arts women's college (which is 91% African American), so tell me how it is unavailable to working class citizens? You didn't mention how the Rockefeller Institute was able to advance medical science, such that the Rockefeller Sanitary Commission eradicated hookworm disease. The government didn't do that.
heavym3tal 9 months ago
@heavym3tal Spieman is a private college (racial denominations dont matter), and the Rockefeller institute only lessened the awful social conditions of the worker, yet even in the Rockefeller archives where you took that "fact", it never lists them ending the disease. The federal govt. protects our rights and is an ever watchful protector of the worker, Private business doesnt do that.
VympelMarine 9 months ago
@VympelMarine And your going to tell me that 1000s of immigrants came to the United States because the conditions here were worse than were they came from? That is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard. You say the the conditions were terrible...easy to make the comparison when you live in the 21st century with indoor plumbing and electricity. Tell me what they were fleeing their home countries from, and why they decided to stay in the U.S.
heavym3tal 9 months ago
@heavym3tal My family moved from Tsarist Russia to escape to a place where they thought their opinions and votes would matter, they were communists, and being foreigners they were suppressed, but were trapped here due to lack of money because of awful wages and conditions. They thought they would have their rights as citizens, and the capitalists spit on their rights.
VympelMarine 9 months ago
The moral of the story, never trust a dog that can smoke cigars.
Jsmith858522 9 months ago
Trump is running for presidental election... ?
RusiaCanal 10 months ago
It just looks like another silly cartoon to me.
GingerGilligan 11 months ago
@GingerGilligan The USSR should contracted out to Disney for better animation, lol
heavym3tal 11 months ago
@heavym3tal To Shitsney? The company that bastardised every European folk tale there is into some soapy yankee happy-end version? I think the Shitsney board of directors should be executed on some main square for their crimes, to start with.
SovietWarrior 9 months ago
@SovietWarrior The thing about free speech is that you can tell any story however you want. If you don't like the way Disney does animation, don't watch their movies, or compete with them.
heavym3tal 9 months ago
@GingerGilligan That's because you were born daft, just like all your yanko compatriots.
SovietWarrior 9 months ago
This country would probably elect that dog president
kozmon0t 1 year ago
hmmm...so there were no crooked people in the USSR?
I call BullSh*t on this one!
heavym3tal 1 year ago
@heavym3tal Maybe you should watch the American Anti-Communist propaganda cartoons instead. Watch what you agree with! :)
GingerGilligan 11 months ago
@heavym3tal
In Soviet Union bullsh*t call on you!
dragosst 10 months ago
@dragosst huh?
heavym3tal 10 months ago
@heavym3tal
Oh. :). It's just a joke. It's a common joke. When someone says "x does y" in a context implying the USSR or Russia you revert it and say : " In Soviet Union y does x" or "y does you" etc. I think it's a satire of the omnipotence of the Soviet totalitarian state and the threat of use of force against dissidents.
dragosst 10 months ago
@dragosst thx for the explanation. I'm not hip with the cool kids, lol.
heavym3tal 10 months ago
@heavym3tal In the first place, its not arguing that they arent crooked, but that the US was (and the Americans were extremely crooked), and that in the US, money can buy you anything.
VympelMarine 9 months ago
@VympelMarine Corruption became more prevalent in the U.S. because the government expanded its power, and began trying to regulate the free market. Do you honestly think there is less corruption in the former soviet union?
heavym3tal 9 months ago
@heavym3tal Perhaps corruption expanded. but it expands with business ( Free Market). The most prosperous times in human history were during Reagan ( When regulation was expanded and taxes raised), during the 50s, increased government control, and this seems prevalent whenever there is an even redistribution of wealth to reinvest in the economy.
VympelMarine 9 months ago
@VympelMarine I don't know where you get your facts from, but the most prosperous time in U.S. history was 1870-1900. In fact, the richest Americans (Rockefeller, Carnegie, Vanderbilt, etc.), who had large companies, were the biggest philanthropists. They built schools, non-profit hospitals, libraries, etc. with their own money for everyone. In fact, the wealthiest Americans today, are also the largest donors to charities. When government regulates business, corruption increases.
heavym3tal 9 months ago
@heavym3tal
I agree with you 100%.
Jsmith858522 9 months ago
@heavym3tal You say that era was the most prosperous, but throughout that era, these capitalists built their empires and monopolies off of the oppression of the working class, they controlled the government up till FDR, they controlled the congress, and they did whatever they pleased. Tell me one school, one non profit hospital, one library they founded. They built educational institutes for the higher echelons of business. Give one thing that the Obama Administration has done that was corrupt
VympelMarine 9 months ago
@VympelMarine Oh, and in regard to the Obama Administration's corruption: 1) TARP, which went to bailout companies, 2) Americans Affordable Healthcare, which Unions and certain people can get waivers for, 3) Subsidies for "Green Energy", which go against true capitalism, 4) No Oil drilling permits to U.S. oil companies, but issuing such permits to Petrobras (a Brazilian oil company).
I can list more, if you want. Besides, FDR was no saint, he was a racist (locked up lots of Japanese).
heavym3tal 9 months ago
@heavym3tal Without the bailouts, the companies would have failed, and the economy would sink lower, Affordable Healthcare is guaranteed to all citizens equally, Green energy assists production, social and working conditions. Petrobras has only a very small operation here in comparison to Chevron, Shell, Exxonmobil, ConocoPhillips who all have major contracts here but produce overseas to reduce costs. Business in America is corrupt, the republican party is corrupt, the right is corrupt.
VympelMarine 9 months ago
@VympelMarine Let me give you a free lesson in the free market. If you make a product that people do not like, your company fails, not to mention that the Democrats had a majority in congress. The healthcare bill is so great that unions and politicians have waviers that state that they are exempt from the law (still no corruption?). Lastly, competition is essential to the free market. That means no subsidies, and no special treatment. Petrobras's permits & green energy subsidies = corruption.
heavym3tal 9 months ago
@heavym3tal Except that when the democrats held congress, the economy started improving, there is equal treatment in a universal healthcare system compared to the biased and slanted private system, and the U.S. govt. does not give subsidies to Petrobras, They do give taxcuts to the rich, to the oil companies, to the banks, who by the way were used quite often for their services contrary to what you said above. Govt. investment into R@D is not corruption but scientific progress. Capitalism fails.
VympelMarine 9 months ago
@VympelMarine I think you forgot to mention that there is more deaths and unequal treatment in a universal healthcare system (Cuba is a perfect example). I never said the the U.S. govt gives subsidies to Petrobras, I said that they are giving permits to them, while denying permits to the other oil companies. Govt. subsidies give an unfair advantage in the free market, as well as regulations like "Cap and Trade" and the C.A.F.E standards.
heavym3tal 9 months ago
@heavym3tal the U.S. govt. does not give out permits as the areas mined are purchased on a private market, and cap and trade and the C.A.F.E. standards provide incentives to reducing green house gases
VympelMarine 9 months ago
@VympelMarine In capitalism, technologies have to compete against each other, and whichever has the best and least expensive product wins. When the govt. takes my tax dollars, and spends it on a product that I don't like, how does that help me? Answer: It doesn't! All it does is increase corruption since companies participating in that market get a payment from the federal government, at my expense.
heavym3tal 9 months ago
@heavym3tal I am well aware, but conservatives in America support cutting federal support to social programs, but believe that subsidies to companies should be maintained. also, it is not your responsibility to decide what the govt. spends on as it supports what is necessary not what is most popular. It is fair distribution of wealth based on necessity.
VympelMarine 9 months ago
@VympelMarine Don't get me wrong, I don't support any kind of subsidies (green or otherwise), and yes many republicans do support farm subsidies. But both parties are part of a political machine that will end, as was shown in the 2010 election when many freshmen (mostly tea partiers) came in. If they do what they are supposed to do, they will stay, otherwise they will be thrown out of office like yesterday's garbage.
heavym3tal 9 months ago
@heavym3tal The American public is generally uneducated about economics and politics and learns most of what they know from ideologically and politically slanted groups like private industry, the republicans and the tea party, FOX news, and other conservative groups. I understand your wanting subsidies to end, but I want private industry abolished entirely
VympelMarine 9 months ago
@VympelMarine I would like to ask how it is not my responsibility to decide what the govt. spends my taxes on? The main principle of the U.S. is that it is governed by the consent of the people, through elected representatives. But can you show me how a fair distribution of wealth is good? How does that cause companies to compete against each other?
heavym3tal 9 months ago
@heavym3tal You elect representatives to decide the budget first, and second, putting money into what is popular would cause companies that are less popular to fail, hurting the economy. Fair distribution of wealth ensures equal treatment, and growing smaller companies till they are able to compete on the international market.
VympelMarine 9 months ago
@VympelMarine You say that you want to abolish private industry, yet you defend the bailouts of the companies. You say your family moved from Tsarist Russia because they were suppressed, but they wanted to go back once they got here? You say that the American public is generally uneducated about economics and politics (and I assume you are "educated", if so explain), but you get your ideaology and political views from groups like communists, socialists, MSNBC, etc.
heavym3tal 9 months ago
@heavym3tal I am simply defending reforms in America as they are a small step towards a socialist economy. My family, as communists, thought that free speech would help them voice their ideas here, but they could not, and they were not free. American conservatives and liberals only listen to slanted news like FOX and Msnbc, i however look at both sides, read arguments and access outcomes, and this has led me to accepting a communist point of view. I watch MSNBC bit i dont believe everything said
VympelMarine 9 months ago
@VympelMarine I watch Fox News, and I disagree with some of the viewpoints there as well. I can only look to historical examples of the implementation of communism and capitalism for evidence. In every instance, governments that instituted communism ended up with poverty and less freedom, while every country that shifts toward a free market has higher standards of living and generally more freedoms.
heavym3tal 9 months ago
@heavym3tal Historical references on communism are deficient because instead of displaying characteristics of communism, they display state capitalism, concentration of resources in state hands without redistributing it to the people. Free market nations do not have a higher standard of living, as many live in poverty in cities, there is a much higher crime rate, Govt. are corrupt, businesses hold too much power, and working and social conditions are deplorable.
VympelMarine 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@VympelMarine My point is that countries that attempt to implement communism always end up with lower standards of living than those that move towards capitalism. The reason there is poverty in the inner cities is government controls (such as welfare and minimum wage). The less barriers that government places on entry into a marketplace, the more competition, and the less power large businesses have on the market. More government control creates more corruption. Can you prove otherwise?
heavym3tal 9 months ago
@VympelMarine
I think heavym3tal just served you up something fierce.
Jsmith858522 9 months ago
@Jsmith858522 Thanks, but facts are facts, and I have seen both sides of the argument. I encourage you (if you haven't already) to study both communist and capitalist theory, and the histories of each. I believe in freedom, personal responsibility, and the unalienable rights of man (<--including women). BTW, sorry if I got on my soapbox.
heavym3tal 9 months ago
@heavym3tal
No need to apologize, you speak the truth.
Jsmith858522 9 months ago
@heavym3tal
Hey heavymetal, since I agreed with you he blocked me... How childish.
Jsmlth858522 9 months ago
@Jsmlth858522 figures
heavym3tal 9 months ago
haha running dog of capitalisim. with a real runing doggy.
desiguy55 1 year ago
This film is pretty good propaganda bacause it's NOT that false, comparing rich Americans to greedy bull dog is actually pretty funny... I would still rather live in the US than in the USSR any day.
zfan2591 1 year ago
@zfan2591 I'd rather live in USSR, where intellect and not money bring you to the top. Yes, you can live in the Land of the Free Idiots.
SovietWarrior 9 months ago
@SovietWarrior You really believe that? You should read a history book(s) about the USSR. Besides this "Land of the Free Idiots" gave the world some of the greatest humanitarians and scientists in the history of mankind. Any from the USSR, that weren't trying to escape?
heavym3tal 9 months ago
I like the funny, Peanuts-esque sounds that the lawyer makes when he's speaking. That's probably exactly what spoken english sounds like to someone from a different culture.
dark7element 1 year ago
In general that this cartoon film shows that in the USA some people do nothing and become millionaires, and they above the law and work while at them are money. In the USSR hated parasitism. There was such saying: "Who doesn't work, that doesn't eat". It's not propagation, it's political satire!
bezplavok 1 year ago
@bezplavok If you believe this resembles how things are in the US, you know nothing about the US...
battleax86 1 year ago
@bezplavok That is not the point of the American society. The main characteristics that everyone can become SOMEONE if he's clever and knows how to go through life, "from rags to riches". Sure there are parasites who only inherit the fortune from their ancestors, but saying that they form the core of the successful Americans is bullshit.
blasty137 1 year ago
@blasty137
In the USSR was considered that if you from bottoms have reached top, you're the best. Look at politicians of the USSR, all were from bottoms. I didn't say that in the USA it was everywhere. But it was in the USA. In the USSR it wasn't and was despised.
bezplavok 1 year ago
@blasty137 You sure don't know much about the power structure in the Yankeestan. It's the same people that stole together their riches backin 19th century, that are still in power. Obama and his clowns are just like the sign hanging on the saloon. Change the sign every 4th year, but the interior is all the same.
SovietWarrior 9 months ago
One thing I find hilarous about communists are how they criticize capitalists who make good money for themselves and claim they have a perfectly "equal" society while leaders in Soviet Russia were more spoiled than any American buisnessman while the peasants died in the fields. The only people who favor communism are the poor who don't want to work to make money in a capitalist society.
AWOLpresents 1 year ago
@AWOLpresents
The poor deserve it, right? Lazing around when they ought to be selling their labor.
Why aren't /you/ rich, if it's so simple?
maximushylandiam 1 year ago
The soviets always seem to put in some type of Third Reich Rememberance in their propaganda (7:54).
chica476 1 year ago
Interesting to note, the Soviet ruling class had access to all the illustrated excesses that were withheld from the proletariat. This propaganda served a double purpose; an attack on the main adversary - the US - and a warning to any worker who wanted to have the same entitlements as the Soviet leaders.
bladeofice01 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It was true then. It's true now.
Commiton 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
it describes us as we really are....not propaganda....but reality of today.
theivangrozhny2010 1 year ago
it describes us as we really are....not propaganda....but reality of today.
theivangrozhny2010 1 year ago 2
This movie clearly show how even a fool who knows nothing about money, economy, politics etc. can become a high member in USA just because of the money. People ignore the fact he is a dog just because he has money and even dance with him and follow what he does and says even if it is idiotic, like the doggy dance. In short terms they say that in USA you are respected and honored as much as you have money...
asdfasqwrt 1 year ago 34
@asdfasqwrt Communist drivel
MrTennesseeVols 1 year ago
@MrTennesseeVols No, not true.
It's like that in the entire world now... Money makes the world go round baby!
asdfasqwrt 1 year ago
@MrTennesseeVols Truth hurts, huh? Watch it again, it exposes your so-called "society" down to the spot.
SovietWarrior 9 months ago
@SovietWarrior I'd rather have Capitalism and Freedom than to have a Communist Peoples Republic where you can go to a gulag for criticising the government in power!
MrTennesseeVols 9 months ago
@asdfasqwrt you can still be an idiot with money and be popular, look at Boris Johnson in London!!!!
MrChainsaw64 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Weakest and crappiest propaganda animation ever.
LulzAnimations 1 year ago
Outstanding!
MrRedFredSaid 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Notice also the thinly veiled racism in this cartoon. I'll explain. When the "rich people" dance they dance to Cuban or Afro-Cuban sounding music. Cuban and Afro style music is a legitimate folk music and in this cartoon they make it associate with bad rich frivolous people.
StopFear 2 years ago
@StopFear
Nah in fact the cartoon criticize the fun they have while the working class suffer
TheBlindPowerslave 1 year ago
Haha, just like someone else in this thread said. Propaganda in USSR made it look like USSR was preventing people from being too rich. YET all the "leaders" and the elite people who controlled the government were extremeley rich, had dachas(summer houses) and lived in richest parts of Moscow (the oldest well taken care of buildings)
When the people had to stand in line for bread or toilet paper, the USSR government had everything! The only poor thing about them was their rhetoric
StopFear 2 years ago
With the recent Supreme Court decision on corp. funding in the political arena, this cartoon is not far off of being reality...United States of Corporate America. as too the benefit of the right wing...at first?
Teabaggersareidiots 2 years ago 4
@Teabaggersareidiots
It has always been that way given how the capitalist system works.
zonilo1 1 year ago
man, this turned out to be a good propaganda! See: you could have fency big wheels, have butlers, expense suits, dance in clubs of living cities, get drunk, have some fun with some hot ass chicks... and in the end you freely vote for a dog to be a senator!
fbferrari 2 years ago
Now somehow I got to know what the stereotype of America from the Soviet viewpoint was.
aaaalku 2 years ago
yeah they were against the Rich But they exagerate. Look how many rich Russians there are today thanks to capitalism.
these cartoons were stupid.
for cartoons America & Japan were light years ahead of the Russians
MetalHeart8787 2 years ago
@MetalHeart8787
Yep, during USSR time, the people in government were all very rich. This was a perk of being in government, you get access to all the things normal people could not get.
StopFear 2 years ago
stopfear - thanks for the support its UNReal how people still fall for this, a old Lady left her money to a BullDog! thats was their argument? WOW! even today Russians are doing Their OWN Propaganda (Not the Government) but Racists who Beat up ethnic groups & Upload on the internet. Have you seen any of that footage?