That guy said that vaccine induced autism has yet to be proven. maybe he should revisit the came of hannah Poling and her multi million law suit. her father was a nuerologist and was able to prove that her autism was indeed caused by her vaccinations.
Parents don't trust the science because they are dumb. vaccines are extremely safe. There is NO EVIDENCE that they cause autism. Parents think that vaccines cause autism because vaccinations given to small children come at a time right before autism can be diagnosed. When a parent doesn't get their kid vaccinated they put everyone else's children at risk.
Watch: " 12 BABY DEATHS VACCINE CONTINUED" here on YT~ Also see the movie" The Constant Gardener" starring Raph Fiennes. The story is fictional the viewer is able to get a better feel for how drug & vaccine trials are conducted~ A poinant part of the film is when the character 'Ham' says, " & from those deaths, we derive the benefits of civilization, benefits we can afford so easily...because those lives were bought so cheaply" also watch Guinea Pig Kids here on YT~
mjr... you do realize that i am a contributing editor on Mary Hollands book, yes? So yes... I have done some research. Probabli in the thousands of hours at this point. I wrote chapter 18 in Vaccine Epidemic, entitled 'Government and Media', which was largly about the Poling case in the VICP. And as mentioned, it is not a court. It is an administrative process where the government does whatever it wants.
Sure morepuppies. Every one of the six autism omnibus cases made it to the courtroom. Did you do ANY research? Lots of cases make it into vaccine court & many even win. Stop blindly believing every inane thing Mary Holland says & do some research. Vaccine court protects both citizens & manufacturers. It provides an expedited route to compensation w/ a generously low threshold for evidence. For certain listed injuries, compensation is automatic.
In response to "more puppies," you said, "Vaccine manufacturers are still held accountable for avoidable harm due to a manufacturing defect." Please listen again to what Mary Holland said in the beginning of the youtube video. She said you can no longer sue in civil court for a defective vaccine design. All you can do for an injury from a defective design is to use the 1986 vaccine injury compensation program, not civil court. -Susan Pearce
In response to "more puppies" you said, "Vaccine manufacturers are still held accountable for avoidable harm due to a manufacturing defect." Please listen again to what Mary Holland said in the beginning of the youtube video. She said you can no longer sue in civil court for a defective vaccine design. All you can do for an injury from a defective design is to use the 1986 vaccine injury compensation program, not civil court. -Susan Pearce
The fact that vaccines are mandated (currently by various forms of official discrimination) says that public health "authority" in America has failed.
We have a war on poverty, a war on drugs, a war on crime. The next war will be a war on informed consent.
The Supreme Court did not say you can't sue for a vaccine injury. They simply said they can't be sued for any common "unavoidable risks" that are vastly outweighed by the benefits. The vaccine court compensates those who may have suffered a side effect. Without this avenue vaccine manufacturing in this country would be overwhelmed by frivolous lawsuits from anyone who so much as gets a hang nail. Vaccine manufacturers are still held accountable for avoidable harm due to a manufacturing defect.
Our government was bought and paid for by the corporations. Our government agencies are corrupt to the core.They bow to companies like Monsanto Dupont,Smith-Glaxco-keens,McDonalds and too many others. We need to clean house. Literally get rid of all 435 members of congress and start fresh. GOOOH.com is the way to do it. We need to get back to what this country was founded on. By the people for the people.
@screwopenborders the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. It created the Federal Vaccine Injury Compensation program, and said that people must go through that first before going to court. So they did, the "Vaccine Court" is totally corrupt, and when families finally got to civil court, Pharma claimed that the Act said that they could never go to civil court. SCOTUS just ruled in favor of Pharma, ignoring the language in the law, and making new law.
That guy said that vaccine induced autism has yet to be proven. maybe he should revisit the came of hannah Poling and her multi million law suit. her father was a nuerologist and was able to prove that her autism was indeed caused by her vaccinations.
DenessaRose 3 months ago
Parents don't trust the science because they are dumb. vaccines are extremely safe. There is NO EVIDENCE that they cause autism. Parents think that vaccines cause autism because vaccinations given to small children come at a time right before autism can be diagnosed. When a parent doesn't get their kid vaccinated they put everyone else's children at risk.
syntheticsteve 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Watch: " 12 BABY DEATHS VACCINE CONTINUED" here on YT~ Also see the movie" The Constant Gardener" starring Raph Fiennes. The story is fictional the viewer is able to get a better feel for how drug & vaccine trials are conducted~ A poinant part of the film is when the character 'Ham' says, " & from those deaths, we derive the benefits of civilization, benefits we can afford so easily...because those lives were bought so cheaply" also watch Guinea Pig Kids here on YT~
promiseIsaih60 4 months ago
mjr... you do realize that i am a contributing editor on Mary Hollands book, yes? So yes... I have done some research. Probabli in the thousands of hours at this point. I wrote chapter 18 in Vaccine Epidemic, entitled 'Government and Media', which was largly about the Poling case in the VICP. And as mentioned, it is not a court. It is an administrative process where the government does whatever it wants.
morepuppies 11 months ago 3
Sure morepuppies. Every one of the six autism omnibus cases made it to the courtroom. Did you do ANY research? Lots of cases make it into vaccine court & many even win. Stop blindly believing every inane thing Mary Holland says & do some research. Vaccine court protects both citizens & manufacturers. It provides an expedited route to compensation w/ a generously low threshold for evidence. For certain listed injuries, compensation is automatic.
mjr256 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In response to "more puppies," you said, "Vaccine manufacturers are still held accountable for avoidable harm due to a manufacturing defect." Please listen again to what Mary Holland said in the beginning of the youtube video. She said you can no longer sue in civil court for a defective vaccine design. All you can do for an injury from a defective design is to use the 1986 vaccine injury compensation program, not civil court. -Susan Pearce
spearce1149 1 year ago
In response to "more puppies" you said, "Vaccine manufacturers are still held accountable for avoidable harm due to a manufacturing defect." Please listen again to what Mary Holland said in the beginning of the youtube video. She said you can no longer sue in civil court for a defective vaccine design. All you can do for an injury from a defective design is to use the 1986 vaccine injury compensation program, not civil court. -Susan Pearce
spearce1149 1 year ago
The fact that vaccines are mandated (currently by various forms of official discrimination) says that public health "authority" in America has failed.
We have a war on poverty, a war on drugs, a war on crime. The next war will be a war on informed consent.
k1mgy 1 year ago
The Supreme Court did not say you can't sue for a vaccine injury. They simply said they can't be sued for any common "unavoidable risks" that are vastly outweighed by the benefits. The vaccine court compensates those who may have suffered a side effect. Without this avenue vaccine manufacturing in this country would be overwhelmed by frivolous lawsuits from anyone who so much as gets a hang nail. Vaccine manufacturers are still held accountable for avoidable harm due to a manufacturing defect.
mjr256 1 year ago
@mjr256 No they won't. Please point out one vaccine injury lawsuit that has made it to a courtroom since the law was passed 25 years ago.
morepuppies 1 year ago
whats the motivation to make a safe product if they cannot be held accountable for anything unsafe
saiyajinmillina 1 year ago 7
Our government was bought and paid for by the corporations. Our government agencies are corrupt to the core.They bow to companies like Monsanto Dupont,Smith-Glaxco-keens,McDonalds and too many others. We need to clean house. Literally get rid of all 435 members of congress and start fresh. GOOOH.com is the way to do it. We need to get back to what this country was founded on. By the people for the people.
JenCorbs 1 year ago 7
Government for, of, and by, the corporations
rfalfonse 1 year ago 5
What law is in place that says the supreme court can tell people they can't sue? Just curious? I mean can they just make a law out of thin air?
screwopenborders 1 year ago
@screwopenborders the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. It created the Federal Vaccine Injury Compensation program, and said that people must go through that first before going to court. So they did, the "Vaccine Court" is totally corrupt, and when families finally got to civil court, Pharma claimed that the Act said that they could never go to civil court. SCOTUS just ruled in favor of Pharma, ignoring the language in the law, and making new law.
morepuppies 1 year ago 2
@morepuppies So is there a loophole or could an appeal be done? Maybe there should be a boycott campaign of the trash company.
screwopenborders 1 year ago
Supreme court is a fraud.
screwopenborders 1 year ago
If we can't sue, don't expect ANYONE to line up for these toxins... sorry, Not shots for me... amazing..
ConservativeNRA 1 year ago 3