A neutron star can destroy our earth by x-rays and gamma rays. A such star can have 10^11 Tesla magnetic field which is extremly powerful. This magnetic field contains a very big energy which can be released within several seconds and can destroy our earth. What do you think about it?
The explanation of the collapsing star, its density and why it is composed of neutrons is excellent. But I remember their being a reason as to why the light emitted pulsates. This was not fully touched upon in this vid. Never the less, it was a good lesson. Thank you for the upload.
This neutron star light house theory no longer can explain all the pulse drifting, pulse nulling, pulse quantization, pulse phase memory, and mode switching and memory ("grammar") observed in pulsars like PSR 0031-07 , PSR 1237 +25 , PSR 0329 +54 , PSR 1822 -09 , PSR 1133 +16 , etc...
In other words the ET communication network is back and will be told to the public when SETI pretends to change focus from shortband song of hydrogen to complicated broadband synchrotron messaging...
This neutron star light house theory no longer can explain all the pulse drifting, pulse nulling, pulse quantization, pulse phase memory, and mode switching and memory ("grammar") observed in pulsars like PSR 0031-07 ; PSR 1237 +25 ; PSR 0329 +54 ; PSR 1822 -09 ; PSR 1133 +16 ; etc...
In other words the ET communication network is back and will be told to the public when SETI pretends to change focus from shortband song of hydrogen to complicated broadband synchrotron messaging...
This neutron star light house theory no longer can explain all the pulse drifting, pulse nulling, pulse quantization, pulse phase memory, and mode switching and memory ("grammar") observed in pulsars like PSR 0031-07 ; PSR 1237 +25 ; PSR 0329 +54 ; PSR 1822 -09 ; PSR 1133 +16 ; etc...
In other words the ET communication network is back and will be told to the public when SETI pretends to change focus from shortband song of hydrogen to complicated broadband synchrotron messaging...
To be fair everyone, the scientific revolution molded Natural Philosophy and Mathematics together, AKA Science. @HRage, even though i do not believe that religion 'started science (?)', your argument is only ad hominem and puts no claims forward. I suggest you learn how to put an argument together and then try to make your claim again.
Why do I see a science video and look at the comments and see religious nuts or perverts in a video about astronomy every time! What has this world come to?
@MegaRoFLL Speaking of VY Canis Majoris, while it may hold the current record of largest star discovered, it is only in diamiter. In terms of mass, There is a blue hypergiant called R136a1 which is estimated at 265 - 300 Solar Masses, and with surfice temperatures of 40,000 degrees Kelvin! Imagine when that thing pops it top.
If a civilization some how adapted and survived on a neutron star with gravity 100,000,000,000 times our they would be equal in strength to superman after he sun dipped.
I just had a flashback of 7th grade and what does this and the koran have to do with anything you can claim in the bible that god saying let there be light was the big bang so please don't inject religion with this...of course I probably blew some stoners mind lol
The Bible said "Let there be light?". Really? Well after the Big Bang photons couldn't travel at all. For the first 300,000 years the universe was opaque (non-transparent for visible light). After the universe cooled it became transparent. For other wavelengths it was opaque for a billion years. See: news.discovery.xxx/space/peeking-at-the-edge-of-the-creation-of-galaxies.html (replace the xxx with com).
So "Let there be light" turned out to be utter crap.
@wormhole199 dude it was just a theory calm the hell down i was simply stating that you can take verses from many religions and apply it to many many aspects that we experience and i know the early universe was more opaque gas then anything it took a long time for that gas to condense into hot gas then finally stars
Many Thanks for Nasa and colleges for these science discoveries, because it proves the scientefic parts of Holly Quran, it is mentioned in Quaran, that the sound of knocking in sky from the star of Piercing Brightness (it pierces the silence of the sky by Knocking), subhan allah, there is no God (Allah) but him only, and no other God. thanks all.
@OmegaDude22 I think it's because it's positively charged and it's spinning fast, making the effect of a current loop that's generating the magnetic field.
@Kincajou They all seem to hate science for some reason yet the computers they use are based on these crazy theories that scientists supposedly make up.
@Kincajou i dont know honestly. Its almost like they love to ruin the video for us by getting overly religious about it. I may be a Christian, but i dont go preaching my religion in a video blog just to try to make a point. Enjoy the video & leave religion out of it. Just watch, not that hard to understand.
@Tatskumi religion is the base of science , because of the religion how everything started . read the Holy Coran and see how many scientific facts are there .
@alitou001 your atrocious articulation alone is a very good reason for any sane person to avoid the koran as a source for science. Why not learn how to put a sentence together (Sesame Street is good for this) and then make your claim again.
This idea that "neutron stars" can even exist is preposterous. The notion that you can simply "squeeze the space out of matter" is absurd on its face and violates known, proven physics. Further, stars do not "run out of fuel", they are not powered by fuel, stars are lit by electric discharge. Also, these objects do not "rotate", they pulse. If you eliminate the rotation assumption you no longer need an impossibly dense object to survive it. Astronogers are fooling themselves.
Star that's 10 to 20 times more massive than our Sun can explode as type-II supernova, so the neutron star is a remnant of this tremendous disaster, such as Calvera, Geminga, PSR 1257+12 (old neutron stars) and Crab Pulsar (a young neutron star).
Supernovae aren't "explosions" in the conventional sense, they are double layers in plasma that are electrically overloaded. Size of the star has nothing to do with it, the important factor is electric current density at the double layer. Further, we have no good way to determine the age of such objects, so comparisons of their relative ages is unmerited.
@MrSirSmoky You gotta bear in mind, for lots of the people who narrate these videos, English won't be their first language. It's difficult to add inflection and emotion into a language that isn't your own unless you are truly immersed in it.
Wow. Could they have picked anyone more boring than these two to narrate this video? They were so monotone and failed to properly annunciate their words that it was actually painful to listen to this video. I could have done a better job than these two. Of course where were they going to find an exciting sounding scientist (expert on neutron stars/pulsars)?
@mrdenisfly Huh. That doesn't sound like something I'd say. That's surprises even me. I retract my statement assuming I said that. I must have but like I said ... it doesn't sound like something I'd say. I'm more grown up than that. Oh well. It's done.
By the heaven, and Al-Tariq (the night-comer, i.e. the bright star); And what will make you to know what Al-Tariq (the night-comer) is?
(It is) the star of piercing brightness;
There is no human being but has a protector over him (or her) (i.e. angels in charge of each human being guarding him, writing his good and bad deeds)
I have a question... They say that most elements that make planets and us, etc. are the result of supernovas. A supernova will always have a neutron star. If this is the case, then where is the neutron star from the supernova that made all the matter in our solar system?
Nope, Most of the matter in the planets (99% of the matter) are heavy elements. The sun and other stars only burn with enough energy to convert hydrogen to helium. It is only when a star dies (in a supernova) that there is enough energy to create the heavy elements. And yes, we were formed from a cloud... A cloud of heavy elements from a dead star.
The molecular cloud from which our solar system condensed was comprised of material ejected by primitive colossal stars that formed in the early universe, when most of space was filled with hydrogen. They had tremendous amounts of available fuel, grew to stupendous size, burned very hot and lived short lives. It is likely that almost all of these erupted in supernovae. Some became enormous black holes, which may have aggregated into galactic cores.
That is not entirely true, all the matter is made due to nuclar fusion, hydrogen to helium, etc.
In a super nova, also in wolf rayet star, a big ammount of that matter is jettisoned into space. Some supernovas leave behind a nebula, a black hole, or a neutron star.
Every supernova does not leave a neutron star. There are many types of supernovae, which leave black holes or other things. And it may be matter from the Big Bang that formed our solar system, not a star exploding.
Just because our material came from supernova doesn't necessarily mean we are anywhere near it's originating point. Ejected materials can travel vast distances when you have that kind of energy.
Sometimes supernovas leave behind a black hole as well. I suppose that in the early Universe the stars were vastly larger and lived short lives. They exploded and ejected the heavier elements all around. As the Universe aged smaller stars with longer lives came about. We fall into that category. Don't quote me though :)
Neutron stars - a single teaspoon of thier matter weighs several million tons. Plus, they can't be larger than 20 miles across due to thier rotating speed. They rotate at over 100 times per second and the PSR J1748-2446ad rotates at 716 times per second.
Your star (or sun) is 1,000,000 times more massive than our sun. But stars in that mass range do not end up as pulsars! Their remnants directly collapse into black holes!
@12000orbits once upon a time people believed that earth is flat. Our knowledge is only based on our senses and the means we have to enhance them(like telescopes). Everything we know so far about things beyond our solar system are assumtions, but NOTHING has yet been proved. We still have a lot way to go. Keep your mind open in any case that anyone proposes
The mass of the Sun is 2x10 on 30 kg, period of the Suns rotation is 25,46 days and the radius is 14x10 on 8 meters. What is the radius and the period of rotation if the Sun transforms into a pulsar?
Pls send me the answer and the formulas with which you came to that answer.
Sol (our sun) wouldn't transform into a pulsar- it's far too small. it was just turn into a white dwarf, and eventualy just burn out, perhaps (worst case scenario), it might eject it's outer layers, causing a nebule, that's not gooing to happen for millions of years though, so dont worry =)
Lol when pulsars were first seen, scientist thought they were signal beacons from aliens because of how exact the pulses were. It was 2 times every second consistently.
HAHAHA THIS GUY SOUNDS LIKE HE IS READY TO SLEEP!
ova69 3 weeks ago
chuck norris Sucks my dick and my dick is just as big and dense as a plusar
Bignadz55 1 month ago
The male narrator sounds like he much rather be playing warcraft than having to explain basic astronomy to noobs.
whitekaminari 2 months ago 3
Chuck Norris plays ping-pong with these
infamousgrosso 2 months ago
I hate it when ppl in the comments tell us what we just learned I'm not 5 I don't need review
Cypher785 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
and stan021 neutron stars spin extremly fast magnetars stars have a ten times magnetic field than a neutron star
zekromarts 3 months ago
Comment removed
zekromarts 3 months ago
Comment removed
zekromarts 3 months ago
watch this show called the univeres it tells you all of the junk people say but more
EPIC!
zekromarts 3 months ago
A neutron star can destroy our earth by x-rays and gamma rays. A such star can have 10^11 Tesla magnetic field which is extremly powerful. This magnetic field contains a very big energy which can be released within several seconds and can destroy our earth. What do you think about it?
stan021 3 months ago
@stan021 pictures or it didn't happen.
l3oss2u 3 months ago
Doesn't thing thing defy Newtonian concept of Gravity?
bfmvshinigami 4 months ago
I ♥ Neutron Stars!!
NAguisrt 4 months ago
The explanation of the collapsing star, its density and why it is composed of neutrons is excellent. But I remember their being a reason as to why the light emitted pulsates. This was not fully touched upon in this vid. Never the less, it was a good lesson. Thank you for the upload.
arkady714 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This neutron star light house theory no longer can explain all the pulse drifting, pulse nulling, pulse quantization, pulse phase memory, and mode switching and memory ("grammar") observed in pulsars like PSR 0031-07 , PSR 1237 +25 , PSR 0329 +54 , PSR 1822 -09 , PSR 1133 +16 , etc...
In other words the ET communication network is back and will be told to the public when SETI pretends to change focus from shortband song of hydrogen to complicated broadband synchrotron messaging...
AlienshateU 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This neutron star light house theory no longer can explain all the pulse drifting, pulse nulling, pulse quantization, pulse phase memory, and mode switching and memory ("grammar") observed in pulsars like PSR 0031-07 ; PSR 1237 +25 ; PSR 0329 +54 ; PSR 1822 -09 ; PSR 1133 +16 ; etc...
In other words the ET communication network is back and will be told to the public when SETI pretends to change focus from shortband song of hydrogen to complicated broadband synchrotron messaging...
AlienshateU 4 months ago
This neutron star light house theory no longer can explain all the pulse drifting, pulse nulling, pulse quantization, pulse phase memory, and mode switching and memory ("grammar") observed in pulsars like PSR 0031-07 ; PSR 1237 +25 ; PSR 0329 +54 ; PSR 1822 -09 ; PSR 1133 +16 ; etc...
In other words the ET communication network is back and will be told to the public when SETI pretends to change focus from shortband song of hydrogen to complicated broadband synchrotron messaging...
AlienshateU 4 months ago
the mumbling dude is annoying
kazmageddon2 5 months ago
..however u spell tht!
IAreCandyLand 5 months ago
I LOVE THIS GUYS ENTHUSIASM!!!
IAreCandyLand 5 months ago
Lol @ that guy's voice.
Hontaish 5 months ago
Wow, that guy sounds enthralled.
QBisbest 6 months ago
Greetings from outer space!!! In my galaxy, we have plenty of neutron stars. Oh, i forgot. We'll be invading your planet next week. See ya!!
waltercelario 6 months ago
To be fair everyone, the scientific revolution molded Natural Philosophy and Mathematics together, AKA Science. @HRage, even though i do not believe that religion 'started science (?)', your argument is only ad hominem and puts no claims forward. I suggest you learn how to put an argument together and then try to make your claim again.
istewartbinks 6 months ago
Interesting but that male voice is most boring voice i have ever heard
JambaB 7 months ago
Good explanation, thanks
powerfulwords 7 months ago
Why do I see a science video and look at the comments and see religious nuts or perverts in a video about astronomy every time! What has this world come to?
MrAwesomesauce101 8 months ago
The guy reciting this has a voice that makes Disney fucking land sound like a morgue...geez!
denmak 8 months ago
@denmak He sounds like Pedro from Napolion Dynamite...Could not understand a fucking word he said.
2012thedevil 8 months ago
There's a system a pulsar star near bye that has 2 planets there probably not habitable considering it's a neutron star.
MrAwesomesauce101 8 months ago
Wait did I hear that right? Neutron stars rotate 700 TIMES per second? O_O
MadeinHell2 8 months ago
@12000orbits there is no star 1000000times more massive than our sun that we know of :)
wo0obly 8 months ago
@wo0obly yes but remember we only know roughly about 0.000000001% of the universe
TheSerpentoftheSky 8 months ago
@TheSerpentoftheSky thats why i said what we KNOW of lol
wo0obly 8 months ago
@wo0obly vy canis majoris , check that out.
MegaRoFLL 8 months ago
Comment removed
wo0obly 8 months ago
@MegaRoFLL that is NOT 1000000 time more massive. your saying theres a star with a diamiter of 1000000 x 1000000? thats 1000000000000miles -.-
wo0obly 8 months ago
@MegaRoFLL Speaking of VY Canis Majoris, while it may hold the current record of largest star discovered, it is only in diamiter. In terms of mass, There is a blue hypergiant called R136a1 which is estimated at 265 - 300 Solar Masses, and with surfice temperatures of 40,000 degrees Kelvin! Imagine when that thing pops it top.
supafly1983 8 months ago
great explanation for my exam soon. thanks
Thevideoclown 9 months ago
Chuck Norris could do a one arm push up on the star surface....
TimpBizkit 10 months ago
prof cox.....ty!
dravidr007 10 months ago
"reaching new heights for 'women?' x-ray astronomy? Is that wat she says?
63gstone 10 months ago
Comment removed
elchippe 9 months ago
If a civilization some how adapted and survived on a neutron star with gravity 100,000,000,000 times our they would be equal in strength to superman after he sun dipped.
RaytownSoClassof2010 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@RaytownSoClassof2010 they lives will be millon times quicker than ours, and they will be small in size.
elchippe 9 months ago
I just had a flashback of 7th grade and what does this and the koran have to do with anything you can claim in the bible that god saying let there be light was the big bang so please don't inject religion with this...of course I probably blew some stoners mind lol
Marine5484 10 months ago
@Marine5484
The Bible said "Let there be light?". Really? Well after the Big Bang photons couldn't travel at all. For the first 300,000 years the universe was opaque (non-transparent for visible light). After the universe cooled it became transparent. For other wavelengths it was opaque for a billion years. See: news.discovery.xxx/space/peeking-at-the-edge-of-the-creation-of-galaxies.html (replace the xxx with com).
So "Let there be light" turned out to be utter crap.
wormhole199 10 months ago
@wormhole199 dude it was just a theory calm the hell down i was simply stating that you can take verses from many religions and apply it to many many aspects that we experience and i know the early universe was more opaque gas then anything it took a long time for that gas to condense into hot gas then finally stars
Marine5484 10 months ago
AKA white dwarf
EnclaveRobloxTV 10 months ago
@EnclaveRobloxTV not the same thing
JD3K 10 months ago
Many Thanks for Nasa and colleges for these science discoveries, because it proves the scientefic parts of Holly Quran, it is mentioned in Quaran, that the sound of knocking in sky from the star of Piercing Brightness (it pierces the silence of the sky by Knocking), subhan allah, there is no God (Allah) but him only, and no other God. thanks all.
msalameh01 10 months ago
fucking hell, most enoying voice of the guy. cmon don't be such a whiny bitch seriously
nsG0 11 months ago
chuck noriss plays soccer with it
irkiIIer 11 months ago 8
@irkiIIer no, chuck norris plays FOOTBALL with it
ChRIs23696 11 months ago 52
@ChRIs23696 lol thats better
gpgpgp13322 8 months ago
@ChRIs23696
Chuck Norris wouldn't call soccer "Football" because he's not a faggot.
MxC1337MxCsh43d 4 months ago
@MxC1337MxCsh43d
what are you on about retarded yankee, you faggots stole the name "football" for your gay game
and I'm not even english lol
Ace0077 3 months ago
@Ace0077
Football's manier then whatever faggotry you're "on about", fucktard.
MxC1337MxCsh43d 3 months ago
@ChRIs23696 both of you shut the fuck up
FIGHTFANNERD3 2 months ago
@ChRIs23696 Chuck Norris plays FUCK with it...
01101111omg 1 month ago
@ChRIs23696 Does it really matter? They are synonyms.
WeaselWJ 1 month ago
@ChRIs23696 chuck norris, being american, plays soccer with it.
jeremalaria 1 week ago
@jeremalaria well the sport, being english you cocky bastard, is called football.
ChRIs23696 1 week ago
My left nut is a neutron star.
enjoixander 8 months ago
@enjoixander Gay.
TheFffoithegreat 8 months ago
@irkiIIer Fuck chuck... Bruce kicked his ass.
Ievolovel 1 month ago
@irkiIIer
and, chuck norris can juggle neutron stars...
EatShiteAholes 4 weeks ago
Quran told us what a pulsar sounds like 1400 years ago.
gobuddyboy 11 months ago
Wait, how do you get a magnetic field from a ball of neutrons? :/
OmegaDude22 1 year ago
@OmegaDude22 I think it's because it's positively charged and it's spinning fast, making the effect of a current loop that's generating the magnetic field.
meteor4163 1 year ago
@OmegaDude22 because it spins REAALLLLY quick!
rnrbishop 7 months ago
if you was to teleport at the surface of a Pulsar for .0000000000001 of a second and teleport back to earth, 1 of two things will happen
1. you'll return as the invisible man *wink*
2. will explode
Dekoomer 1 year ago
Neutron Star - It has such a density, that if you had 1cm3 it would weigh as much as all the cars in the US.
LaughsWontHurt 1 year ago
Why is it that science vids always get these religious nuts?
Kincajou 1 year ago 2
@Kincajou They all seem to hate science for some reason yet the computers they use are based on these crazy theories that scientists supposedly make up.
intheshitter 1 year ago
@intheshitter
Exactly. You'd think allah and muhamad would've tossed them a computer er two.
Kincajou 1 year ago
@Kincajou i dont know honestly. Its almost like they love to ruin the video for us by getting overly religious about it. I may be a Christian, but i dont go preaching my religion in a video blog just to try to make a point. Enjoy the video & leave religion out of it. Just watch, not that hard to understand.
Tatskumi 1 year ago
@Tatskumi religion is the base of science , because of the religion how everything started . read the Holy Coran and see how many scientific facts are there .
alitou001 1 year ago
@alitou001 your atrocious articulation alone is a very good reason for any sane person to avoid the koran as a source for science. Why not learn how to put a sentence together (Sesame Street is good for this) and then make your claim again.
HRage 11 months ago 3
@HRage language is not science ,its literature ...
alitou001 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This idea that "neutron stars" can even exist is preposterous. The notion that you can simply "squeeze the space out of matter" is absurd on its face and violates known, proven physics. Further, stars do not "run out of fuel", they are not powered by fuel, stars are lit by electric discharge. Also, these objects do not "rotate", they pulse. If you eliminate the rotation assumption you no longer need an impossibly dense object to survive it. Astronogers are fooling themselves.
fertilizerspike 1 year ago
Comment removed
jsalex17 1 year ago
@jsalex17 Good for you!
intheshitter 1 year ago
@jsalex17 OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooookaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy . . . . whatever.
Tatskumi 1 year ago
Is the commentator on drugs? Man, he sounds like he's depressed or something.
Good video and explanation though.
iycgtptyarvg 1 year ago
DESTROY the narrators!
MasterTJ007 1 year ago
The narrator sounds like hes dying and has strep throat. Could barely grasp what he was saying
BluebluredX 1 year ago
Stephen Hawking could do a better narration.
richcoolerearth 1 year ago 3
it's really hard to hear him as he mumbles and they put that annoying music in the background.
Oxyster7 1 year ago
Star that's 10 to 20 times more massive than our Sun can explode as type-II supernova, so the neutron star is a remnant of this tremendous disaster, such as Calvera, Geminga, PSR 1257+12 (old neutron stars) and Crab Pulsar (a young neutron star).
DuxBellorum87 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DuxBellorum87
Supernovae aren't "explosions" in the conventional sense, they are double layers in plasma that are electrically overloaded. Size of the star has nothing to do with it, the important factor is electric current density at the double layer. Further, we have no good way to determine the age of such objects, so comparisons of their relative ages is unmerited.
fertilizerspike 1 year ago
Aaaaaaaaa!!! Those narrators are so... BORING!!!! Wake UP!!!
MrSirSmoky 1 year ago
@MrSirSmoky You gotta bear in mind, for lots of the people who narrate these videos, English won't be their first language. It's difficult to add inflection and emotion into a language that isn't your own unless you are truly immersed in it.
lordieuan777 1 year ago
Wow. Could they have picked anyone more boring than these two to narrate this video? They were so monotone and failed to properly annunciate their words that it was actually painful to listen to this video. I could have done a better job than these two. Of course where were they going to find an exciting sounding scientist (expert on neutron stars/pulsars)?
jimnorcal1 1 year ago
@jimnorcal1 haters guna hate :S i found th video very informative
mrdenisfly 1 year ago
@mrdenisfly Huh. That doesn't sound like something I'd say. That's surprises even me. I retract my statement assuming I said that. I must have but like I said ... it doesn't sound like something I'd say. I'm more grown up than that. Oh well. It's done.
jimnorcal1 6 months ago
The fastest spinning Neutron star now is one that is spinning at 1022Hz!
That narrator has the most dull voice I've ever heard
tommyk77 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
By the heaven, and Al-Tariq (the night-comer, i.e. the bright star); And what will make you to know what Al-Tariq (the night-comer) is?
(It is) the star of piercing brightness;
There is no human being but has a protector over him (or her) (i.e. angels in charge of each human being guarding him, writing his good and bad deeds)
Quran sort Al-Tariq verses: 1-4
Tofy710 2 years ago
BOOBIES
Dahibd1 2 years ago
@Dahibd1 tits
azafhl 1 year ago
I have a question... They say that most elements that make planets and us, etc. are the result of supernovas. A supernova will always have a neutron star. If this is the case, then where is the neutron star from the supernova that made all the matter in our solar system?
bitchslaughterer 2 years ago
@bitchslaughterer
The solar system wasn't formed from a supernova. I think it was formed from a cloud or something.
MaraudingMaster 2 years ago
Nope, Most of the matter in the planets (99% of the matter) are heavy elements. The sun and other stars only burn with enough energy to convert hydrogen to helium. It is only when a star dies (in a supernova) that there is enough energy to create the heavy elements. And yes, we were formed from a cloud... A cloud of heavy elements from a dead star.
bitchslaughterer 2 years ago
@MaraudingMaster
The molecular cloud from which our solar system condensed was comprised of material ejected by primitive colossal stars that formed in the early universe, when most of space was filled with hydrogen. They had tremendous amounts of available fuel, grew to stupendous size, burned very hot and lived short lives. It is likely that almost all of these erupted in supernovae. Some became enormous black holes, which may have aggregated into galactic cores.
friedpootatoos 2 years ago
That is not entirely true, all the matter is made due to nuclar fusion, hydrogen to helium, etc.
In a super nova, also in wolf rayet star, a big ammount of that matter is jettisoned into space. Some supernovas leave behind a nebula, a black hole, or a neutron star.
Helge129 2 years ago
I think you mean all elements heavier than hydrogen - the particles that nuclear matter is made of originate from a time before stars.
friedpootatoos 2 years ago
Every supernova does not leave a neutron star. There are many types of supernovae, which leave black holes or other things. And it may be matter from the Big Bang that formed our solar system, not a star exploding.
TehYTP 2 years ago
Just because our material came from supernova doesn't necessarily mean we are anywhere near it's originating point. Ejected materials can travel vast distances when you have that kind of energy.
friedpootatoos 2 years ago
Sometimes supernovas leave behind a black hole as well. I suppose that in the early Universe the stars were vastly larger and lived short lives. They exploded and ejected the heavier elements all around. As the Universe aged smaller stars with longer lives came about. We fall into that category. Don't quote me though :)
laserfloyd 2 years ago
I do now believe that Muhammed is telling us the truth, and that he's the messenger of The world's creator, ALLAH.
doctornouna 2 years ago
Amazing how this this harvard university student says these stars are called pulsers. Prophet Muhammad knew this 1400 years ago the from the Quran.
1- By the heavens and The pulser.
2- How will you comprehend what the The pulser is?
3- Its a piercing star.
86-The pulser, 1-3
IslamAyaat 2 years ago
I just discovered one of these, youngest person to ever discover one ^_^
Lucas6194 2 years ago 2
congratulations :)
serfaksan 2 years ago
Thank you :) They're doing the interview early september.
Lucas6194 2 years ago
Congrats!
BCSpore 2 years ago
Thank you :D
Lucas6194 2 years ago
Neutron stars - a single teaspoon of thier matter weighs several million tons. Plus, they can't be larger than 20 miles across due to thier rotating speed. They rotate at over 100 times per second and the PSR J1748-2446ad rotates at 716 times per second.
channysherly 2 years ago
well the neutron magnatar is one of my favorites i think that they start off at a magnatar and form on to a pulsar later on like 1000 2000 years old
t4c03 2 years ago
pulsar's are very very dense making them extremely heavy
mixshorty222 3 years ago
No shit sherlock.
Deanoshea23 2 years ago 2
Your star (or sun) is 1,000,000 times more massive than our sun. But stars in that mass range do not end up as pulsars! Their remnants directly collapse into black holes!
12000orbits 3 years ago
@12000orbits million solar mass do not exist. Pressure can not go as high as to support that kind of star.
joab321 1 year ago
@joab321 yeah, only supermassive black hole can be millions or billions solar mass
TheHeho 1 year ago
@12000orbits once upon a time people believed that earth is flat. Our knowledge is only based on our senses and the means we have to enhance them(like telescopes). Everything we know so far about things beyond our solar system are assumtions, but NOTHING has yet been proved. We still have a lot way to go. Keep your mind open in any case that anyone proposes
NeutralNegotiator 1 year ago
@12000orbits
It starts from approximately 100 Sun masses to whatever's more than that :)
Rolandhinio 1 year ago
Can someone send me the formula to this exercise:
The mass of the Sun is 2x10 on 30 kg, period of the Suns rotation is 25,46 days and the radius is 14x10 on 8 meters. What is the radius and the period of rotation if the Sun transforms into a pulsar?
Pls send me the answer and the formulas with which you came to that answer.
pigbigtig 3 years ago
Sol (our sun) wouldn't transform into a pulsar- it's far too small. it was just turn into a white dwarf, and eventualy just burn out, perhaps (worst case scenario), it might eject it's outer layers, causing a nebule, that's not gooing to happen for millions of years though, so dont worry =)
piccleman016 2 years ago
Food for thought:
The "EARTHQUAKE" that caused the tsunami was very terryfying...
However, when the earth is at least 10 LIGHTYEARS AWAY, (yes, 10 years traveling in the speed of light)
The "wave" from the STARQUAKE of a Magnetar of this magnitude CAN END ALL LIFE ON EARTH..
even from 10 light years away
AND
The magnetar starquake released more energy in one-tenth of a second (1.3×1039 J) than our sun has released in 100,000 years
its that powerful...
mikeberserkr 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
did u know that this proves the quran true and the islam true ?
dbz4e 3 years ago
how?
danisoyyo 3 years ago
to dbz4e:
yeh, I can also finally tell people there's proof that flying monkeys fly out of my ass.
Penguinz13989 2 years ago
Lol when pulsars were first seen, scientist thought they were signal beacons from aliens because of how exact the pulses were. It was 2 times every second consistently.
abdu123 3 years ago
hmmmmm
docvij 3 years ago
Very interesting!
lepape2 3 years ago 2