Added: 1 year ago
From: PakistaniShaheen
Views: 15,735
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (161)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Pakistani people are combination of persian, punjabi pashtun,and balochi . By showing that video you try to show that Pakistani is better than India????

  • MONGOL!!

  • MAJORITY OF PAKISTANIS WHO CALL THEMSELVES MUGHALS ARE CARPENTERS, WHO STARTED CALLING THEMSELVES "MUGHALS" IN 1980s. THEY ARE UNDOUBTEDLY FAKE MUGHALS!

  • urdu is hybrid language

  • @abuzar12345 no such thing scientifically speaking

  • urdu is mixture of arabic, persian, sanskrit and different turkic languages

  • @abuzar12345 no it's not. Urdu is an Indo-Aryan language derived from Sanskrit with an Indo-European syntax. Look up these things before commenting on them

  • @PakistaniShaheen im talking about vocabulary of urdu not family. 50 % of words borrowed from persian and arabic....

  • @abuzar12345 every language borrows vocabulary from another language. English borrows vocabulary form Japanese does that mean it came from Japanese?

  • @PakistaniShaheen lol, how many words english borrwed from japnese? not more than 50.........if u read urdu and persian u can find thousands of common words

  • @abuzar12345 english borrowed many words from japanese and arabic. English actually borrows more than other languages. EVERY language borrows thousands of words. urdu's syntax is based on Sanskrits, not farsi's. Farsi does not even have gender distinction. Urdu is an Indo-Aryan language. It is not semitic like arabic or iranic like persian. learn about linguistics before making up stuff.

  • @PakistaniShaheen i never said that urdu is iranic or semitic

  • @abuzar12345 you claimed Urdu is from Farsi and Arabic. Arabic is a semitic language, Farsi is an Iranic language. You cannot combine languages to form another. You can only borrow words from another language. Urdu's syntax is based on Sanskrit not Farsi or Arabic. Urdu is not at all related to Arabic or Turkish.

  • @PakistaniShaheen Babur was Turko-Mongol and half Persian. 

  • @Sherzod125 babur was not half persian, he embraced persian culture.

  • Comment removed

  • @Sherzod125 babur was turko mongol

  • Comment removed

  • @abuzar12345 if he is not half persian, so he is chinky mongol?

  • @PakistaniShaheen but arabic and persian words distinguish urdu from hindi

  • @abuzar12345 what if we replaced those Arabic and persian words by Chinese words? Urdu will be called hybrid of Chinese? When Chinese has a completely different grammar from Urdu?

  • @PakistaniShaheen without persian and arabic words urdu is incomplete

  • @abuzar12345 What do you mean? Babur embraced persian culture?

  • @Sherzod125 babur adopted persian culture

  • @TheAbsoluTurk if they are mughal why would they be killing hazara's

    and this hasnt been stated that much but hazara are of the ilkhan empire

  • Comment removed

  • which music it at start?

  • @sniperrana i downloaded it from a site called tuva podcast

  • thanks bro for posting this video.... our past was wonder

  • @sniperrana welcome. Hope you found it useful

  • @PakistaniShaheen But Mostly of Pakistanis belong to Central Asian Race. People of Central Asia also look like us by physical characteristic. Even our Food and culture are asl overy similiar like we eat Nan and Pulao. Many commen words between Uzbek,Uighur and Urdu... we can catch the main idea when they talk.

  • @sniperrana

    Central Asian is not race

    Tajiks are Persians

    Uzbeks are half Persian and half turko-mongol

    Turkmen are half Persian and half turko-mongol

    Kazakh are Mongol

    Kirgiz are Mongol

  • @Sherzod125 how about Ughur? do you know something about them?

  • @sniperrana Tatars is 85% caucasoid, 15% mongolid 

  • @Sherzod125 Who are Tatars then?

  • @Sherzod125 tajiks are persianized, they are not ethnically persian. they are indiginious pamir peoples

  • @PakistaniShaheen hehehe you say tajiks are pamir people and they are persianized,?

    In Central Asian back 600s only only Persians lived before Turko mongols, Arabs, Greeks invation.

  • @PakistaniShaheen I don't care what race your is but we Uzbeks hate mongols !!!!!!!!!

  • @Sherzod125 I don't care if you Uzbeks hate mongols, but this video explains we are not Turanian

  • @PakistaniShaheen No one says that Pakistani are Turanian, what made you to say that?

  • i was watching a video on genghis khan they said that he about 5000 children and even today they can link his genes to the area..... lucky guy

  • What????...they were not from Rawalpindi GHQ:))

  • @TheEnchantress007- I know sanskrit is older than panjabi, I never meant 2 say that, I was tryin 2 say its older than urdu/gujarati/ bangali n hindi, it came out wrong. Also the population of delhi is 11million, so how can their b 10 million sikhs around their? Also sikhs may speak hindi their, but their 1st language wil always b panjabi. Hindi is a language forced down ppls throats, ask south indians

  • @KopSingh1986 punjabi comes form sanskrit as all indo-aryan languages do

  • @TheAfghan72 i never said anything from the start. I only typed. Why you actually heard my voice? i'm telling ya that heroine is generating all sorts of halucinations in your head.

  • Let me make it straight, Ghenghis khan took over most of Asia and Eastern Europe. When he took over a major piece of land he would leave his son, or a grandson to rule it. After taking over middle east a group of Mongols were left to govern it. Mognols in Middle east converted to islam, Mongols in europe to Christ and in central asia to budhism. Middle eastern natives couldnt pronounce "Mongol", so they said Mughal. There were no turk, or indian ingenuity but supremely from their Mongol rulers

  • mughasls were afghans

  • @TheAfghan72 yeah next thing Muhammed Bin Qasim was Afghan as well....Mughals were Mongolians. Afghans have no culture or history or technology so they claim other peoples their own.

  • @PakistaniShaheen HAHA omg man that comment made me laugh really, Pakistan wasn't a country before 1947 and they claim some pretty funny shit, well at least we have more history than you clowns! Even Indians mentored that the mughal rulers were Afghans.

  • @TheAfghan72 there was no such thing as afghanistan before 1747. Pakistan on the other hand was home to the Indus and Vedic civilizaitons. mughals were from central asia, originally from mongolia. if you afghans want to be mongolian fine with me. you don't fool anyone by claiming every empire as your own. next thing you'll be telling me the ottomans were afghan too right? genghis khan he was afghan too right? I'm the one who's laughing really hard.

  • @PakistaniShaheen There was Afghanistan before 1747 it was under adiffrent name calleed "Ariana" and as for paksitan there was no pakistan or india befoe the british colinization, infact they wre ruled by diffrent empries int eh past.

  • @TheAfghan72 nonsense. Ariana was a name for for eastern iran and western afghanistan. alos arian was a common name through south and central asia. Pakistan was first the Indus Valley going back 3000 BC and then was known as Sapta Sindhu during the vedic period Even modern Afghanistan was ruled by Punjab during the Sikh Empire. Pakistan has an ancient and rich history going back at least 9000 recorded years. Mohinjadaro and Harrappa are both prehistoric cities. mughals were mongolians not afghan

  • @PakistaniShaheen LOL your joking......right?

  • @TheAfghan72 Yes, he was:)

  • @PakistaniShaheen Afghans were rules in India before the Moguls took over. What are you smoking to say that Afghans had no culture?

  • @786swe Afghans are the smokers of heroine it's a fact. That's why they make up lies by claiming central asian and persian empires as their own

  • @PakistaniShaheen Well if we do get high of heroine then it explains the why we fuck your sister and mom's considering they are tiugly but we can't rlly tell since we are so high of opium, fag!

  • @TheAfghan72 lol a person who practices Bacha Bazi is calling me fag?? i'm laughing really hard at this

  • @PakistaniShaheen . Im telling you man those curry fumes have gone way to much to your head to even think like that, your failed state harbored osama bin laden and now your sending missles into afghanistan? lol go to afg or india you will see that on the map their is no paksitan.Infact pakistan is an evil gap in between the gateway between afghanistan andd india. Hey did you know that urdu is mixture of pastho sindh and hindi? and guess who told me that, a paki freind of mines.

  • @TheAfghan72 first of all brother the way your talking is basically coming from the main stream Media controlled by the jews and they created this to put us pakistanis and afghans in a conflict thats the truth man i was born in the westeren world i know whats it like here i have many Afghan friend who we call eachother brothers and sisters, pakistan is not sending any rockets dont forget americans are there and causing a fake attack to blame it on Pakistan so both nations fight to build a piple

  • @TheAfghan72 and trust pakistan is one of the most powerful Muslimd nations where India is trying to destroy so dont get twisted on the Media cause they all lie , on top of that India supports Isreal and killing more muslims Pakistan is pissed off at whats going on case of the war and the US building a pipe line from Iraq to Afghanistan and trying to in Pakistan into the Arabian sea i already did my reaserach, Aghans are strong people they dont need an army but we all have to fight as one

  • @TheAfghan72 URDU is from Arabic, Turkish and Persian NOT hindi, sindh or pastho FACT look it up!!

    Salam brother

  • @shanmirza007 oh man you pan-islamists are fucking joke. urdu is not even related to arabic or turkish and how did urdu develop grammatical gender distinction if it's from farsi? farsi has no grammatical gender.

  • @PakistaniShaheen go and study it then you will know cause i have turkish and arab friends and some of the words are the same educate youe self man look it up!

  • @shanmirza007 english has many words form arabic and japanese. funny how the uneducated asks others to educate themselves

  • @PakistaniShaheen Sorry for eavesdropping on the conversation, but the new YT format means that it showed up in my news feed. :P I was kind of curious, by the way, which language the song used in the video is in.

  • @thephilosopherkartik first song i think is in mongolian or maybe thuvan. not sure. the second song is in khakas, a turkic language spoken in siberia. that i can confirm.

  • @TheAfghan72 Osama was not in Pakistan is you believe the Zionst MEDIA then youhave neen fooled, they never had the body at all and said they dumped it in the sea so they lied, it was just to show the world that Pakistan had him which was a FALSE flag attack on Pakistan to go to war with them cause the military of Pakistan to get the US drones out my mid-May and int he next week they did a false flag attack and said OHH we got Osama look at all the muslim countries man we are getting ATTACKED!

  • @shanmirza007 your aghani "brothers" are a bunch of terrorist niggahs who need to be deported from Pakistan and wiped out. 

  • @PakistaniShaheen Afghans are one of themost strongest people on this earth no army could take them out, iam a canadian-pakistani and ihave many afghan friends but first we are all muslims then you can call yourself anything you want CAUSE thats the biggest problem with muslim nations they NEVER stick together which is their downfall, so please all muslims stay as ONE!

  • @shanmirza007 yeah because other muslims are proud of what they are wheras Pakistanis always worship them in the name of Islam. And no Afghans won because they were supported by pakistan and America. I am Pakistani first then maybe Muslim. If you love Afghans so much you shouldn't call yourself Pakistani. you are just another brainwashed wahabbi implant made to serve arabs, afghans...anything but Pakistan. Look at how you claim Mongolian ancestry and call yourself Kashmiri. pathetic.

  • @shanmirza007

    Than will you please explain why Bangladesh separated from Pakistan? Religion can not become the binding force for any nation...better understand this historical fact or you are doomed to re-experience it my brother!!

  • @PakistaniShaheen Hey Hey calm down their slumdog millionare, bacha bazi was a discusting act brought upon the greeks to central asia. Do some reasarch porki!

  • @PakistaniShaheen yo paaji, where is panjabi in the language chart in the video? Panjabi is older than all these indo-pak languages, older than urdu, which stole alot of words from lahori zabaan (Old Panjabi). thats why lahore/amritsar (Mahji panjabi) is considered as the original in all of Panjab. thanks mate

  • @KopSingh1986 it's on the white chart. look carefully.

  • @PakistaniShaheen yo man im sorry 2 sound stupid but panjabi aint on the language chart. where is it? all i c is sanskrit, urdu, bangali, gujarati n dirty hindi. Panjabi pre-dates all these

  • @KopSingh1986 it seems the chart does indeed miss out punjabi, but i think it's nothing to worry about since everyone knows punjabi is indo-aryan. all indo-aryan languages are derived from sanskrit.

  • @KopSingh1986 Dude, Punjabi (my mother tongue too, BTW) doesn't predate Sanskrit. Punjabi is actually derived from Sanskrit in the same way Spanish and French developed from Latin. Look up 'Indo-Aryan Languages' on Wikipedia and read up a little on the linguistic history of our subcontinent for yourself.

  • @KopSingh1986 Also, about 10 million Sikhs in and around Delhi speak Hindi as a native language. If your agenda is to troll Indians wherever you find them, please at least be aware that belittling Hindi kind of defeats your own purpose.

  • @PakistaniShaheen Afghans (some tribes more than others) are ethnically very close to Persians and Afghans (some tribes more than othes) are ethnically very close to central Asians.

  • @TheAfghan72 No.

  • Genghis Khan's son Chagaatai --->>> Mughals --->>>Turko Mongols forever !!!

  • so many Mangols r living here since hundred of years

  • Mughals are turks, not Iranians nor indo-european. Babur himself is Andijani from Uzbekistan. One more thing, the first thing that mughals did in their way to Bagdad was to distroy the Khwarizmian empire which covered persia plus Afganistan and part of Pakistan now. The invasion came from the north and north west, that is why the Khwarizmian empror fled to india to aviod fighting the mughals.

  • @malcomeks no but central asian turks as well as Mongolians have some Indo-European influence form the Scythians who inhabbitted Central Asia. The modern uyghurs are parcially Tocharian

  • People in pakistan are not mangol its tru, but mangols were refered as mughal in different languages. That term was generalised after that. When ISLAM grow in PERSIA as it was acepted by the royal families there. Slowly it started spreading towards east. When it came to afgan and pakistan, the term MUGHAL was unchanged . So all who got converted to ISLAM was called as Mughal. You can take reference from Changez khan who was in china. mangolia that time.

  • CHagatai's correct Mongolian pronounce is Tsagaadai.Persian and indian turkic people can't tell that and it changed to chagatai.our great khaan's name was not Genghiss Khan.correct one is Chingiss Khaan.Chingiss khaan's first son is Zuchi.He was controlled Golden horde.Second is Tsagaadai.He was controlled south west Asia.third son is Ogoodei.he was controlled whole Mongolian empire after Chingiss Khaan.Bagatur mean is hero in Mongolian.this word also using in many countries.

  • Mughals are not Afghan or Indian they are invaders.

  • @xabamsar exactly, though there are claims they descend from chagatai turks which would mean they carry indo-european turkic dna in them. 

  • @PakistaniShaheen The Chagatai Turks had their origins in Mongolian people so they are not Indo-European.

  • @xabamsar you don't understand. In ancient times many IE tribes migrated to Central and Eastern Asia such as the Scythians and Tocharians. Then about 1500 years ago, migrating Turko-Mongol tribes mixed with them. Many Central Asian Turks and Mongolians have IE genes in them as a result of this. Many Mongols and Uighur turks have blond hair .

  • Mughal was a tribe from Uzbekistan, they exist in Central asia not South Asia, last Mughal King and his stooges were thrown out to Myanmar where they all vanquished

  • with a hint of GOLD

  • mughals are YELLOW or BROWNISH colour

  • EVERYONE that is not dark skinned indian, is a MUGHAL MONGOL TURK, mughal means MONGOL TURK in SANSKRIT DARDIC PEOPLE CALL US MUGHAL and also PERSIANS

  • we dont know arabic, we learn arabic for religeion, we learn persian for literacey

  • our forfather also take VERRY ARAB names but always knowing and telling they are Mughal

  • we people embrace culture of wherever we are. Islam stop us from embracing bad habits from other cultures. Names include, Janghir, Khan, Ahmed, Ali, Hussain, Ilahi, Shajahan, AUrungzaib .... and so on many arab words too or persian or turk

  • @ilikebeubz Just because a group of people adopt a particular language, religion, dress or names, does not change who they truly are. Look If a black crow drinks milk it will not make him white!

  • @uqiimu were all human

  • every single persion in our entire liniage is a high skilled worker, and we got squillions of relatives first cusons worldwide

  • north pakistani are of MUGHAL DECENT mixed ancestory

  • we have many relatives that look exactly like gengis khan in that picture, and also like tamerlane, babur etc and same like turks and mongols - we from north pakistan south kashmir

  • Hey guys, does anyone knows what the names are of these songs in this video. The first one sounds very Mongol, but who is the artist? Would be great if someone knew!

  • @montydessert mongon ool is the genre

  • Mughal's were Timurids (mixed Turkish and Mongol, part of the Turanian family).

    They later married (more) Turklsh, Persian and Indian women.

    Direct decendents of the Mughal family now live in parts of Pakistan.

  • @TheMughalEmpire the kings have 200 childeren EACH

  • @ilikebeubz Yes ..... From Hindu Rajput women! Not pure bloods> Stop being ashamed of your Indian Hindu past okay! All Pakistani and Indian Muslims are convertees from Hinduism . A small group ... SMALL are actually " Mughals" . And then these Mughals never came to India for Islam or dawah, They came for dunya.

  • @TheMughalEmpire The direct descendants of the last Mughul emperor lives in Indian, not Pakistan.

  • @786swe Mughals are muslims and are not ethnically Indian, and the last decendend is in Pakistan where the Mughals home is in Lahore, do your research , iam Mughal not Indian we own the Taj Muhal and everything built by Mughals our fathers not you black hindus

  • @shanmirza007 My dear friend. The word "Mughul" refers to a people whose dynasty was estbalished in India with the arrival of some Mongols (already Muslims by then). Withing a couple generation, they have married local women and hence have Indian blood in them. Hence the the majority of Mughuls especially the living ones these days are Indians. And you do not own Taj Mahal. The people of India owns it.

  • @786swe the people of India DONT own it and its true what people say you Indians think you own everything but coundlnt even build such a beautiful building, built by MUSLIMS NOT HINDUS, it has persian writing on it which means its not Hindu its belongs to muslim Mughals, India is 90% hindu not muslim most Indians are very uneducated on their histroy i suggest you learn something and Mughals were not Indians and for one their facial features were fair skinned people you guys are black FACT

  • @shanmirza007 'Muslims' built it, not 'Indians'? What exactly do you even mean by that? Muslims and Indians aren't dichotomous categories, there are 160 million of them living in India as Indian citizens. As far as the Mughals and their ethnicity is concerned, if this well-researched video didn't convince you enough, go to Wikipedia and read through the citations. The Mughals were a Mongoloid race and spoke Chagatai; a Turkic dialect. Look in the mirror, do you have Mongoloid features?

  • @shanmirza007 Frankly; this is the third time I encountered your putrid regurgitation of highly concentrated stupidity. Is trolling and verbally abusing random people you don't know and spreading unsubstantiated and ignorant revisionist propaganda your full-time profession?

  • @shanmirza007 As of now, the people of India own it because it is a national property, Is that so hard to understand? And why are you differentiating between Muslims and Indians. The Mughuls made their home in India. By the time Taj Mahal was built, the Mughuls were Indians. India does not mean Hindus. Whether the Indian Hindus are ignorant about their history o not is irrelevant.

  • @786swe the mughals were neither indian nor Pakistani. Just like the British. their history belongs to no other than Great Britain. Is that understood?

  • @PakistaniShaheen Define "Indians". You are so narrow-minded that you pick on labels instead of seeing it in its context of the discussion.

  • @786swe i define them as the citizens of what is today india. even though they are diverse racially, they hold the same citizenship that's what i'm refering to them as just like "american" it means citizens of america.

  • @PakistaniShaheen If you are still referring to the Mughuls when you say "them", the people of Mughul India, in my opinion, were citizens of India and hence Indians (f Mughuls era, not of modern India). The descendants of them today are definitely Indians of modern India which doesn't mean they are of Hindu descent. Why should the word "India" of today represent only Hindus descent or of practising Hinduism as hinduvuta wants to. Get my point?

  • @786swe they can't be because that time there was no india. I could say the same for the British...moreso since they were citizens of the British Raj...but no. Mughals were no more "Indian" than the British were..

  • @TheMughalEmpire yes your right my mother and father are both Mughal/Kashmiri

  • This Documentary is riddle with inaccuracies Mughal are NOT Mongol. Most definately!!!

  • PakistaniShaheen

    3) Taimur Lung simply made few raids on India just to plunder the country and dislodge House of Guzzni who were Muslim ruler their ancestry originate from Arab and Turk one of the General of Mohammed Bin Kazsim. Genghis Khan was’nt Muslim by birth he was Nomad and worship God known Tangiri which known as gray wolf or something like that. The “Baburnama” is the most correct written account of Babur missing almost 9 years of account.

  • 1)Mughals are not extinct some of their remnant are still can be found in West Bengal in India, Bahadur Shah Zaffer was the Last Emperor. Mughals are not Mongols but account as follow Central Asian King known Timrid or Taimur Lung (Turk) who married a daughter of Chugatai Khan.

  • 2)The Chugtai Khan was the second son of Genghis Khan (Universal Ruler) The House of Mughal established by Grandson of Timrid (Taimur lung) who known as Babur, originate in Fargana; present days Uzbekistan and west border of Kyrgyzstan. The King Baburs first language was Chugtai Turk.

  • @imrank340 - Chugtai is a well known surname amongst many peopl living in Pakkstan and especially in the Mughal City of Lahore ;).

  • @ALANSARALHAQ

    I do not doubt about this fact. My forefathers originate from Central Asia they came with Babur's Army as high ranking military officers and remain in the services of Moghul till 1857, during that insurgency whole family whipped out by British, except a baby boy 10 months old.

  • @imrank340 Genghis Khan was nt muslim but his descendants converted to Islam and rebuild the region from Baghdad back to Central Asia - from their legacy came to the central asian muslims including Babur... Many turkic muslims settled in the region we call Afghanistan & Pakistan and their heritage continues to live as there are many Pakistanis today & Afghanis with Central Asian features as is the case with some Bengalis in Bangladeshi especiallya round Sylhet.

  • @ALANSARALHAQ 2)None of His descendent converted to Islam except Chugtai’s Daughter; but he (GK) had large number of Turkish army almost 65% who were Muslims and title of Khan awarded to many of them due to their gallantry services. Islam spread in united India by Mohammed Bin Kasim during 744 when he travelled to India. Not Genghis Khan or his descendents and well before birth of Genghis Khan. The Bengali's were indigenous people converted to Islam before Moghuls arrival to India.

  • @ALANSARALHAQ 1)Genghis Khan’s son Chugtai Khan was governor of South West, East Asia, present days Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, and Tajikistan, Afghanistan, Azerbaijan, Khorasaan and large part of east Persia, Iraq. After death of Chugtai Khan these region declared as autonomous. The Qubulai Khan the grandson of G. Khan was concentrated mostly on China. The Khan was a Title given to those who fought bravely in the battle fought by G. Khan and descendents.

  • 3) Taimur Lung simply made few raids on India just to plunder the country and dislodge House of Guzzni who were Muslim ruler their ancestry originate from Arab and Turk one of the General of Mohammed Bin Kazsim. Genghis Khan was’nt Muslim by birth he was Nomad and worship God known Tangiri which known as gray wolf or something like that.

  • 3) Taimur Lung simply made few raids on India just to plunder the country and dislodge House of Guzzni who were Muslim ruler their ancestry originate from Arab and Turk one of the General of Mohammed Bin Kazsim. Genghis Khan was’nt Muslim by birth he was Nomad and worship God known Tangiri which known as gray wolf or something like that.

  • Mughals are extinct now

    what's left of them is now in south asia....

    They were Chagatai Uyghurs but pure Chagatai's are extinct and their chagatai homeland has diminished.... and they're descendants in south asia remain...

  • @papasmurfXXX I dont know about chagatai, but you got the rest correct

  • Great video :D

  • I will tell you a little story - Great Arab Armies and later scholars and religous leaders came and settle dn GHAZNAVI ..they then travelled and settled where PAKISTAN is today where they spread Islam.

    We are the same ethnicity as Afghans, Arabs, Turkics and Mughals .. just look at the eyes of Northern Regions.. I am from Kashmir and my family have eyes like the above because the children of Genghis Khan became great MUSLIMS like Babur and Akbar who settled in what is PAKISTAN for 1000 years.

  • @ALANSARALHAQ So you look Mongolian?? hen you do not look Kashmiri. Mughals are Turko-Mongol. Turkics and Mongols have the origin search for Altaic peoples.

  • @ALANSARALHAQ Genghis khan was not Muslim, he was Shamanist. Also not his childrens or any other mongols were Muslims. FIRST GET SOME INFORMATION THEN TALK.

  • @jpathan786 Who was Tehmur Lane? Who was Babur of Kabul..?? descendants of Genghis Khan whose predecessors became muslim.

  • @ALANSARALHAQ just because they are Muslim doesn't make them our ancestors otherwise we'd look mongol

  • @jpathan786

    I hope this is correct account of Mogule?

  • @jpathan786 His descendants did become Muslims and it is a historical fact. Turkish tribes (some anyway) are Mongols as well.

  • @jpathan786 The descendants of Genghis Khan did become Muslims eventually.

  • @ALANSARALHAQ

    3) Taimur Lung simply made few raids on India just to plunder the country and dislodge House of Guzzni who were Muslim ruler their ancestry originate from Arab and Turk one of the General of Mohammed Bin Kazsim. Genghis Khan was’nt Muslim by birth he was Nomad and worship God known Tangiri which known as gray wolf or something like that. The “Baburnama” is the most correct written account of Babur missing almost 9 years of account.

  • @ALANSARALHAQ

    1)Mughals are not extinct some of their remnant are still can be found in West Bengal in India, Bahadur Shah Zaffer was the Last Emperor. Mughals are not Mongols but account as follow Central Asian King known Timrid or Taimur Lung (Turk) who married a daughter of Chugatai Khan.

  • @ALANSARALHAQ

    Mughal are NOT Mongol!!! This documentary riddle with inaccuracies and totally incorrect.

  • @ALANSARALHAQ No you are not. There is no such thing as " Afghan" ethnicity. Kashmiri are of north Indian Hindu and Buddhist descent. Many Kashmiri families , later, converted to Islam, not too long ago. Kashmiris are, according to bone structure and ancestry, an Indo Aryan peoples. ( Indian). Kashmiris are not " Afghans, " Turks". etc. Kashmiris have foreign blood. The Gujaratis (India) have heavy Iranian, and Greek ancestry. Does this make Gujaratis automatically " Persian" ? No !

  • @uqiimu kashmiris are a dardic people of Indo-European descent and are related to other northenr Pakistani populations. you are correct to write they are not arab or turkic or "afghan"

  • @PakistaniShaheen Yes this was my point. They are a Dardic peoples who are found in the vallies of Jammu and Kashmir, and are classed as an Indo Aryan peoples

  • They are INDO-ARYAN. When mughal came from central asia (afganistan & pakistan this time) many got cross brid with arab also. But, genetically their DNA have INDO-ARYAN breed.

  • @dhiraj14381 no Mughals are not Indo-Aryan bred. Indo-Aryans were removed from Central Asia thousands of years ago.

  • @PakistaniShaheen : First get clear who r mughal. If go through history (not false history, refer discovery or very old book, do not believe on books in pakistan it all are manupulated). Many people in pAk and af are of that breed.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more