5:47 come on mark, come on John and in the end come on Ronnie, yea it would be nice for the defending champion be playing there but lost to Mark Allen in the second round :(
It surprises me that Alan Chamberlin is still allowed to ref given the controversy that surrounds him. He once refused to clean a ball for a player saying in his opinion it didn't require cleaning!!! amazing since that is part of his job and not for him to refuse. I think Willie Thorn is commenting here and he rightly said it's nothing to do with the ref if the players want a re-rack which is good to see as most commentators don't speak out enough. Hopefully this idiot ref will retire soon.
@OnePastMidnight Part of me agrees with you, but wouldn't that lead to smashing them on the break off shot. Consequently spreading the balls and making it easier for the other player to score high? In pool its quite likely for a ball to sink but not in snooker with the table been bigger and the pockets been smaller. I'm happy to be wrong on this one but that was my initial thought to your comment.
Like on that safety shot before the second re-rack, he could have put it in the corner of bank with a bit of backspin, and had the whiteball back at the top.
Till, at this level I always expected it to run like a normal game, but them actually making all of the bank shots and combination shots we half call and half hope go in.
@AlexLai816 the commentator said 'we'll lets set them up then'. I didn't hear anything from the Ref, I think the crowd were laughing at the situation.
Does anybody like Alan Chamberlain? Even at 9:00, Willie Thorne displays disdain towards him - and Willie Thorne comes across as the sort of person who like everybody!
the facts of the matter is that chamberlain is refing this match because he is qualified to unlike anybody commenting on this vid,so realy nobody can say anything because you know less than him
The clown chamberlain shows his arrogance again. Who does this fool think he is, he doesnt have the knowledge, skill or credentials to decide when a frame is at a re-rack situation, the players do, thats why they excel at this game.
world referee? you got to be kidding! why the fuck is this wanker on the circuit! i heard so many bad comments about him and this just proves everything! one word WANKER!
world referee? you got to be kidding! why the fuck is this wanker on the circuit! i heard so many bad comments about him and this just proves everything! one word WANKER!
He speaks about him like hes abit of shit to, very bad. Jesus the man just said i dont think we are at stale mate yet, thats all!!!!!!! he didnt say your not having one lol and yet apparently hes the one who plays the rule book way to hard. As for this videos description? He refused them another re rack?..... WHEN.
Omg he blames Alan playing the rules abit to far and yet crys like a fucking baby when Alan simply gave his point of view that he didnt think the time was right for the re rack, Alan wasnt saying dont re rack, or your not having one, he was just giving his opinion incase it helped matters! The guy doesnt like him because of previous things, hes a super ref to have at a game.
Its the things like chucking the towel up in the air and that being such a big deal that makes snooker seem boring to some i guess. I mean if that was the climax, lol
They Rerack if 1 or more red ball is at the top of the table while the pack is closed it saves them wasteing time by roleing up 2 the pack all the time
@RyanWatchesNaruto They get to a point of a stalemate where no-one's clearly going to budge and to save time they do a re-rack. It used to be that the ref would give them X number of chances to get out of it, but nowadays they know what's coming and, like here, look at each other... "Re-rack?" "Yep". Job done :)
Re-rack is a term that is used to describe the abandonment of a frame so that the balls can be set up again and the frame restarted with no change to the score.
Re-racking is carried out upon agreement between all the players concerned, normally as a result of a situation such as trading of containing safeties, where there is no foreseeable change to the pattern of shots being played, so the frame could go on indefinitely.
@RyanWatchesNaruto basically if the game is goin no where ..... so they both keep tapping the balls into the other bunch it will go on and on and on so its to save time
Yep, the frame was just going nowhere. I like the way they don't waste time with X amount of shots each, these days - they just look at each other and "Re-rack?" and then it happens.
@SnookerPlanetPT well your new to me, never seen this one before or did I ? So João deleted antifanboy1, antifanboy2, JoãoES147 and SnookerPlanetPT the snooker planet account on you tube, I got you now son I will expose you in the snooker planet forum and to the Portuguese Billiards Federation. I will like to see the authorities save you ass now !!! lol
ok.. its not up to the ref whether to re-rack or not... but he didnt say he wont do it.. he just THINKS it not the time for a re-rack yet... i think the problem was that john wasnt too sure himself :)
Yeah, because this is a quarter-final, ductrung3993!
And you were right, dagreatmogul, he is a idiot of a referee and contact with
him at Google!!!!
Rafael13596 3 days ago
One idiot of a referee. If you agree, google Alan Chamberlain and contact him on his site telling him what you really feel about him! I did!
dagreatmogul 1 month ago
lol they sit next to each other
ductrung3993 2 months ago
5:47 come on mark, come on John and in the end come on Ronnie, yea it would be nice for the defending champion be playing there but lost to Mark Allen in the second round :(
rvpnumb 5 months ago
Selby is not amazing I can tell you that, poor spormanship towards John Higgins and butter balls
rvpnumb 5 months ago
selby is a pu**y
fas44444 5 months ago
It doesn`t matter what you think of Alan Chamberlin ,`cause he`s on the WPBSA.
julian1471 5 months ago
who won?
gokawi 6 months ago
It surprises me that Alan Chamberlin is still allowed to ref given the controversy that surrounds him. He once refused to clean a ball for a player saying in his opinion it didn't require cleaning!!! amazing since that is part of his job and not for him to refuse. I think Willie Thorn is commenting here and he rightly said it's nothing to do with the ref if the players want a re-rack which is good to see as most commentators don't speak out enough. Hopefully this idiot ref will retire soon.
cupomash2 7 months ago
two :))
DjMarcward 8 months ago
Selby is just fantastic, at the end: ''Re-rack?''
That's just amazing.
killekillekille1 8 months ago 4
I don't like this ref, he seems unkind
wedgehedge444 10 months ago
that ref has to hate selby,,good god,,
weebageeba 10 months ago
Snooker could take a leaf out of pool rule books stipulating that atleast 1 object ball must touch rail on a shot to prevent stuff like that.
OnePastMidnight 10 months ago
@OnePastMidnight Part of me agrees with you, but wouldn't that lead to smashing them on the break off shot. Consequently spreading the balls and making it easier for the other player to score high? In pool its quite likely for a ball to sink but not in snooker with the table been bigger and the pockets been smaller. I'm happy to be wrong on this one but that was my initial thought to your comment.
matthewbowers88 10 months ago
@OnePastMidnight That's impossible in snooker. Player will try to put cueball near red balls heap and opponent will fail to do anything.
sarbasov 6 months ago
alan chamberlin is an old hag and a dried up old windbag
MAVERICK1SASR 1 year ago
"Re-Rack?" xD
Savior2k5 1 year ago
Like on that safety shot before the second re-rack, he could have put it in the corner of bank with a bit of backspin, and had the whiteball back at the top.
Membersacc 1 year ago
I don't get why the always shoot safetys, they have so many avilable shots.
Membersacc 1 year ago
@Membersacc You dont because your not playing for a title and thousands of pounds
AnglOsAxOn2 1 year ago
@AnglOsAxOn2
Till, at this level I always expected it to run like a normal game, but them actually making all of the bank shots and combination shots we half call and half hope go in.
Membersacc 1 year ago
chamberlain is a prick about time he retired
andos8888 1 year ago
what did the ref say and what did the commentator say after 'exactly' in around 9:03?
AlexLai816 1 year ago
@AlexLai816 the commentator said 'we'll lets set them up then'. I didn't hear anything from the Ref, I think the crowd were laughing at the situation.
TearTheRoofOff 1 year ago
who won?
uNamed2lyfe 1 year ago
@uNamed2lyfe Higgins. He went on to win the championship. Doubt he'll play again after all the allegations of match fixing this year though.
DomSezXL 1 year ago
@DomSezXL yeh lol i saw the whole match....selby didnt even get a go at it!!
higgins....?? match fixing??? really??
uNamed2lyfe 1 year ago
@uNamed2lyfe Yep, just search on TopTellyFan's channel for "higgins suspended" and you'll see all about it.
DomSezXL 1 year ago
hey where's the red goin, hey where's the white goin , hey where's the sun goin, where's my wife goin?
ribhkum 1 year ago
Does anybody like Alan Chamberlain? Even at 9:00, Willie Thorne displays disdain towards him - and Willie Thorne comes across as the sort of person who like everybody!
Olliguer 1 year ago
@Olliguer And everyone like Willie Thorn. :)
HengistTheGreat 1 year ago
the facts of the matter is that chamberlain is refing this match because he is qualified to unlike anybody commenting on this vid,so realy nobody can say anything because you know less than him
tranceinitiative 1 year ago
Alan Chamberwank
thedudeabides97 1 year ago 3
The clown chamberlain shows his arrogance again. Who does this fool think he is, he doesnt have the knowledge, skill or credentials to decide when a frame is at a re-rack situation, the players do, thats why they excel at this game.
edwardfirth49 1 year ago
"Re-rack?.....Yes?" Hahahha
atomdragon4 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
world referee? you got to be kidding! why the fuck is this wanker on the circuit! i heard so many bad comments about him and this just proves everything! one word WANKER!
greatdane90 1 year ago
world referee? you got to be kidding! why the fuck is this wanker on the circuit! i heard so many bad comments about him and this just proves everything! one word WANKER!
greatdane90 1 year ago
what a night
Busher50 1 year ago
lol the ref refused them another re rack..... But never really, that should be the description.
CarpMagic95 2 years ago
@CarpMagic95
I think you must be his grandkid.. i'm just saying, just an opinion..
straightJO 1 year ago
He speaks about him like hes abit of shit to, very bad. Jesus the man just said i dont think we are at stale mate yet, thats all!!!!!!! he didnt say your not having one lol and yet apparently hes the one who plays the rule book way to hard. As for this videos description? He refused them another re rack?..... WHEN.
CarpMagic95 2 years ago
Omg he blames Alan playing the rules abit to far and yet crys like a fucking baby when Alan simply gave his point of view that he didnt think the time was right for the re rack, Alan wasnt saying dont re rack, or your not having one, he was just giving his opinion incase it helped matters! The guy doesnt like him because of previous things, hes a super ref to have at a game.
CarpMagic95 2 years ago
Its the things like chucking the towel up in the air and that being such a big deal that makes snooker seem boring to some i guess. I mean if that was the climax, lol
CarpMagic95 2 years ago
They Rerack if 1 or more red ball is at the top of the table while the pack is closed it saves them wasteing time by roleing up 2 the pack all the time
ILoveClubbin 2 years ago
10:26 Mark "Re-rack?"
lol, nice one Mark. Hahaha
Ignigarde 2 years ago 7
why do they re-rack, im pretty new to snooker
RyanWatchesNaruto 2 years ago 7
@RyanWatchesNaruto They get to a point of a stalemate where no-one's clearly going to budge and to save time they do a re-rack. It used to be that the ref would give them X number of chances to get out of it, but nowadays they know what's coming and, like here, look at each other... "Re-rack?" "Yep". Job done :)
TopTellyFan 2 years ago 8
Re-rack is a term that is used to describe the abandonment of a frame so that the balls can be set up again and the frame restarted with no change to the score.
Re-racking is carried out upon agreement between all the players concerned, normally as a result of a situation such as trading of containing safeties, where there is no foreseeable change to the pattern of shots being played, so the frame could go on indefinitely.
pillthepower 2 years ago
they re-rack when a stalemate comes along.. usually when the players keep rolling onto the balls slowly.. this only means the frame begins again
scouserdan3 2 years ago
@RyanWatchesNaruto basically if the game is goin no where ..... so they both keep tapping the balls into the other bunch it will go on and on and on so its to save time
xFRAGxMOVIESx 1 year ago
I really don't like Alain Chamberlain. He's not a good ref.
Toolshedful 2 years ago 39
just as the commentator siad "the ref is there to fetch the balls and call fouls", just like a good little doggie
phastasm 2 years ago 4
wait, im a noob at snooker. why did they re rack at 4:58?
Season0 2 years ago
Because of the loose red next to the green, the only safety shot they could play was a tap into the bunch of reds.
tomthecool 2 years ago
Yep, the frame was just going nowhere. I like the way they don't waste time with X amount of shots each, these days - they just look at each other and "Re-rack?" and then it happens.
TopTellyFan 2 years ago
That ref must hate Selby. He's always fucking with him.
MrEmpirical 2 years ago 38
@MrEmpirical That's because Alain screwed him over royaly when he played Dott some time ago.
KoivuTheHab 1 year ago
suppose there is only 1 red on the table + yellow, green, brown, blue, pink , and black
so i pot the last red and then snooker behind any of these colors?
is it ok or foul?
the147break 2 years ago
Yup, that's okay. You can first pot a red, then play a colour. And if you pot the colour, you can go for the yellow :)
dutchieboy80 2 years ago
yes i think that would be ok
BaToScAp227 2 years ago
if you pot the red it's still your turn, d'oh
s0ulseek3r 2 years ago
lol 6:50
COME ON MARK... COME ON JOHN....
...
COME ON JOHNNY
sh1monn 2 years ago
Mark "Re-rack" Selby
SnookerPlanetPT 2 years ago 7
@SnookerPlanetPT well your new to me, never seen this one before or did I ? So João deleted antifanboy1, antifanboy2, JoãoES147 and SnookerPlanetPT the snooker planet account on you tube, I got you now son I will expose you in the snooker planet forum and to the Portuguese Billiards Federation. I will like to see the authorities save you ass now !!! lol
rvpnumb 4 months ago
alan chamberlain is a right prick proper white tosser
06033970 2 years ago
When Mark said re-rack @ 10:30 did the referee dont be silly?
russelltrigger 2 years ago
yeah it sounds like that actually
vStealthv 2 years ago
oh right cheers
russelltrigger 2 years ago
nah he says "can i just have a look please" to see whether or not selby is snookered
muggins0 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
he is a cunt..... always goes for re rack
john40pl 2 years ago
ok.. its not up to the ref whether to re-rack or not... but he didnt say he wont do it.. he just THINKS it not the time for a re-rack yet... i think the problem was that john wasnt too sure himself :)
dani200105 2 years ago 3