@iasedu Not really. I - and, as Pinker pointed out, most people - had never heard of it. Yet it was a war obviously more brutal and more violent than any other.
@TomFynn If the Rehoboth population of 60 in western Namibia is attacked, and 36 people in the tribe is killed in the attack, do you get to hear about it? Would anybody run into a cave and write it on the walls, so that National Geographic could make an episode on it 4000 years later?
@TomFynn You have misunderstood everything, I think. Steven Pinker is talking about how violence has declined AFTER civilization and culture, the most violent times of our history was when we lived in tribes and hunter/gatherer societies, were populations ranged from 60-150. Were war and battle was common, and fatalities higher.
@iasedu Yes, I know. I got that impression from his TED talk. What amazes me is that a war which wipes out 90% of a population even in our information age (ok in the last ~150 years) can slip so completely under the radar. It happened around the time of the American Civil War, had twice the amount of casualties and yet no one has ever heard of it...
@TomFynn Correction: 400000 *soldiers* on both side. For Paraguay alone the total losses *including* civilians were around 1.2 million people. 90% of the population...
I do not think he covers perhaps the largest reducer of killing conspecifics in ancient times. That being the rise of agriculture, which created a reason not to kill all the enemy other than female children and reproductive age females. That reason being (abhorrent by our current standards of course) slavery.
@Pokrokus I don't think you understand, Steven Pinker is not arguing a position, is he collecting and presenting data, he only gives his opinion on the conclusion of what the data show.
@GeoSchadenfreude I'm not sure if you are being serious or not.. The Bible is a real composition of actual writings from real historic periods. The fact that the Bible is written by real people who lived in a society, and influenced by that, is reflected throughout the Bible. Most parts of the Bible is supported by history, it's not like Pontius Pilatus or Julius Cæsar are fictional! There are occasional tales and made-up nonsense in it, but it's still a piece of history.
@iasedu No I don't believe you would, if you have any sense of morality and empathy, which I believe you do. I HATE this "necessity" argument, and it sounds really like a justification, or at least an attempt, for justifying cruelty and immorality (yes...). Ideologically motivated, oh my god, of course he is...
@ftacla01 You are the person with a lack of empathy here, try to put yourself in the shoes of a desperate husband who has watch his baby cry in desperation.
Have you even barely read this book? Do you really, really think this, that his evidence, alone, of even that his main piece of evidence, is that "15% of pre-historic skeletons showed signs of violence"? Oh god, I disagree with Pinker's otimism, in a way; not because we're too violent, but because we're definitely not too intelligent.
Pinker helps overturns my deeply held ideas (by presenting evidence) with great regularity.
sulljoh1 3 days ago
@sulljoh1 Good :)
iasedu 3 days ago
A war killing 60% of the population? Holy shit! How the hell come no one has ever heard of it?
TomFynn 1 month ago
@TomFynn Was that a joke?
iasedu 1 month ago
@iasedu Not really. I - and, as Pinker pointed out, most people - had never heard of it. Yet it was a war obviously more brutal and more violent than any other.
How the hell could that have come about?
TomFynn 1 month ago
@TomFynn If the Rehoboth population of 60 in western Namibia is attacked, and 36 people in the tribe is killed in the attack, do you get to hear about it? Would anybody run into a cave and write it on the walls, so that National Geographic could make an episode on it 4000 years later?
iasedu 1 month ago
@iasedu 36 people? Probably not. 400000 people? Even in mid-18th century? Somehow I thought that would be more news worthy...
TomFynn 1 month ago
@TomFynn You have misunderstood everything, I think. Steven Pinker is talking about how violence has declined AFTER civilization and culture, the most violent times of our history was when we lived in tribes and hunter/gatherer societies, were populations ranged from 60-150. Were war and battle was common, and fatalities higher.
iasedu 1 month ago
@iasedu Yes, I know. I got that impression from his TED talk. What amazes me is that a war which wipes out 90% of a population even in our information age (ok in the last ~150 years) can slip so completely under the radar. It happened around the time of the American Civil War, had twice the amount of casualties and yet no one has ever heard of it...
TomFynn 1 month ago
@TomFynn Correction: 400000 *soldiers* on both side. For Paraguay alone the total losses *including* civilians were around 1.2 million people. 90% of the population...
TomFynn 1 month ago
@TomFynn Oh, I didn't know which war you were referring to.
iasedu 1 month ago
@iasedu Should have been more precise. I was referring to the "War of the Triple Alliance".
TomFynn 1 month ago
@TomFynn Nearly forgot: Cool stuff. Thanks for upload!
TomFynn 1 month ago
Interesting version of Human History ...anyway hope be true.
TonanteOrffeus 1 month ago
Great book and a great lecture.
OwensTV 2 months ago
Interesting statistics, well presented.
dahveeboy 2 months ago
I do not think he covers perhaps the largest reducer of killing conspecifics in ancient times. That being the rise of agriculture, which created a reason not to kill all the enemy other than female children and reproductive age females. That reason being (abhorrent by our current standards of course) slavery.
MrCharleswagon 2 months ago
3:40 to skip the loooooooooing intro
yuriythebest 2 months ago 4
I am not convinced by his arguments.
Pokrokus 3 months ago
@Pokrokus I don't think you understand, Steven Pinker is not arguing a position, is he collecting and presenting data, he only gives his opinion on the conclusion of what the data show.
iasedu 3 months ago 15
How does he account for hunting gathering accidents vs living in a more protected state society?
AdaptiveReasoning 3 months ago
@AdaptiveReasoning What do you mean?
iasedu 3 months ago
@GeoSchadenfreude I'm not sure if you are being serious or not.. The Bible is a real composition of actual writings from real historic periods. The fact that the Bible is written by real people who lived in a society, and influenced by that, is reflected throughout the Bible. Most parts of the Bible is supported by history, it's not like Pontius Pilatus or Julius Cæsar are fictional! There are occasional tales and made-up nonsense in it, but it's still a piece of history.
iasedu 3 months ago 3
Comment removed
DimmedDiamond 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@iasedu A Spiderman comic book isn't considered a real composition of writings because popular people or landmarks are referenced.
DimmedDiamond 1 month ago
@DimmedDiamond Not true.
iasedu 1 month ago
@GeoSchadenfreude Why?
iasedu 3 months ago
I'm always skeptical of people who make a presentation with Powerpoint using colorful comic sans font
raoulvaneigem1 3 months ago 4
@raoulvaneigem1 How silly you are.
iasedu 3 months ago
being poor won't make me kill someone
FIGHTFANNERD3 3 months ago
@FIGHTFANNERD3 If you can't put food on the table for your wife and kids, sure you would.
iasedu 3 months ago
@iasedu No I don't believe you would, if you have any sense of morality and empathy, which I believe you do. I HATE this "necessity" argument, and it sounds really like a justification, or at least an attempt, for justifying cruelty and immorality (yes...). Ideologically motivated, oh my god, of course he is...
ftacla01 3 months ago
@ftacla01 You are the person with a lack of empathy here, try to put yourself in the shoes of a desperate husband who has watch his baby cry in desperation.
iasedu 3 months ago
but great vid
FIGHTFANNERD3 3 months ago
so the black race cant bring themselves to the level of whites or asian's
but sadly its true
FIGHTFANNERD3 3 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Watch stefan molyneux if you want a balance to this state-loving bullshit.
Trompenburgh 4 months ago
@Trompenburgh Disagreeing with facts isn't that productive.
iasedu 4 months ago 10
@iasedu
His facts of "15% of pre-historic skeletons showed signs of violence" is all but convincing. He is ideologically motivated to love the state.
Trompenburgh 4 months ago
@Trompenburgh Oh yes, I love the state. Don't you?
iasedu 4 months ago
Comment removed
ftacla01 3 months ago
Comment removed
ftacla01 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Have you even barely read this book? Do you really, really think this, that his evidence, alone, of even that his main piece of evidence, is that "15% of pre-historic skeletons showed signs of violence"? Oh god, I disagree with Pinker's otimism, in a way; not because we're too violent, but because we're definitely not too intelligent.
ftacla01 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Interesting how there is a negative correlation between religious influence in society (better education and reading etc), and violence...
GowanBray 4 months ago