Added: 9 months ago
From: RussiaToday
Views: 59,920
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (1,009)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @VonVanVonder The ones who protested a dead soldiers funeral?

  • wheres westboro baptist church when you need them.

  • well that was fun .

  • Gingrichs Wife looks like Ailen Witch hahaha

  • @aldin276 Wrong, she's an alien ROBOT witch -> big difference ; p

  • hahaha

    

  • That is disgraceful and not political activism.

  • yeah this fascist is immoral. Sick of the panderers to the oligarchy. Here comes the revolution and here come the war trials. Nuremburg eat your hearts out.

  • So a person who can't argue ideas with Newt just pours glitter on him instead.

    [sarcasm] Stay classy, activists.

  • wait what did he do why do u guys hate him so much

  • Should've hit him with more of it and less on the table.

  • TASTE THE RAINBOW BITCH lol thats pretty funny if only it had a cool song playing and no voices

  • slave to israel

  • Wanna hear a joke?

    Newt

    :)

    ;o

  • Ha! Ha!

  • Finally from these debates I get a sense of who Newt Gingrich really is -- a pompous blowhard, drunk on his own cleverness. Because he has spent so much of his life surrounded by Washington hicks, puppets, and other assorted fools, he assumes you can fool all of the people all of the time.

    >>>>>"Nice to live in a free country ..." if you're a rich white heterosexual guy connected to power who makes laws oppressing and enslaving the majority. Yup, Newt, you got that right.

  • Time to March on Washington? - DEMAND the Voting Machines be removed (they only cost $20M - freedom is worth more) - DEMAND an 'Honest' Independent Investigation of DIEBOLD Voting Machines - DEMAND Paper Ballots - DEMAND the vote counters be screened for Masonic NETWORK Affiliation - SCRUTINISE Electronic Polls (the whole idea of precincts is to keep the local count manageable) - DEMAND Candidate Representatives Affidavit CONSENSUS on Votes from each Precinct - DEMAND A FAIR Election NOW
  • Like a boss! RON PAUL 2012

  • i like how he just brushes the glitter on the floor. He's just like, I don't have to clean it up. That's probably some poor person's job.

  • Ron paul 2012.

  • NEWT WHAT THE FUCK WHY WOULD YOU SWEEP IT ONTO THE FLOOR. IT'S GOING TO BE SO MUCH HARDER TO CLEAN NOW.

  • "Nice to live in a free country ..." if you're a rich white heterosexual guy connected to power who makes laws oppressing and enslaving the majority. Yup, Newt, you got that right.

  • @funboy7979 BY 2015 ALL STATES WILL BAN GAY MARRIAGES AND I WISH THEY BAN GAY COUPLES FROM ACTING LIKE STRAIGHT COUPLES IN PUBLIC PLACES, RIGHT NOW WE HAVE 39 WHO ALREADY BANNED GAY MARRIAGE AND MAYBE 7 MORE IN 2012

    GOOD THING WE HAVE PEOPLE LIKE NEWT, WHO WILL ALWAYS STAND FOR DECENCY we must fill the state and federal governments with people like him

  • @THEHELENOHENZO You fill the state and federal government with people like him, and you'll go bankrupt even faster than we already are. We can't afford to give every single politician millions of our tax dollars just for their own leisure time. But I guess you like the idea of having kings and lords instead of representative government, don't you?

  • @melbyRick LET GO BANKRUPT that we start again with a new system include constitution

  • @melbyRick idiot just vote newt it will speed up the revolutionary process when everything goes to shit

  • Gay people threaten the sanctity of Newt's three marriages.

  • Oh and for all you socialist Obama lovers out there, all the presidents before Obama had a COMBINED debt of 13.2 trillion, Obama ALONE has a debt of 13.7 trillion...

  • I don't understand how people hate on Gingrich for being to conservative, yet they love Ron Paul who is 10 times more conservative! Get your head out of your ass haters! The main problems in this country are not if Tommy can marry Billy, or giving more benefits and handouts to those pieces of shit on wall street. The real problems are putting our economy back together, and subduing the terrorist threat that way 9 11 doesn't happen all over again , then we can bring our troops home!

  • @ChainBaseball25 There's nothing conservative about a federal ban on gay marriage. Supporting a federal ban is supporting MORE government intervention and more infringement on people's liberties, and that's pretty much classic liberal methodology. It's the "conservative" equivalent to the "war on religion" that Newty-Newt is always complaining about. If he was a conservative, he would leave the issue of gay marriage to the states. Steadily, the states are catching on and legalizing gay marriage.

  • @Paradise737 BY 2015 ALL STATES WILL BAN GAY MARRIAGES AND I WISH THEY BAN GAY COUPLES FROM ACTING LIKE STRAIGHT COUPLES IN PUBLIC PLACES

  • Comment removed

  • 0:13 "That was fun"

  • Comment removed

  • typical douche bag liberal fags..cant debate shit, so they resort to code pink belligerence, and 8th grade shenanigans...

  • Comment removed

  • hahahaha classic.... seems people don't like him as much as the media would try to make you think.

  • Newt should have bounced his head off the table and made him to clean that shit up!

  • @Bostinlagga Newt should have his own head bounced off the table; it would have sounded like a basketball I bet. Seriously, I think he sets the record for being the person with the biggest head who ever ran for president. Not to mention the biggest ego.

  • P2A0U1L2

    

  • nobody does that to Ron Paul!

  • epic gay weapons glitter

  • I want to buy that guy all the drinks.

  • Fuck Newt!

  • @AdamSavage88 No, actually; the reason he's unfit to be president is because he took 1.6 million dollars of OUR MONEY! He takes money for political favors, and meanwhile we all got stuck with paying for the bailouts of Freddie Mac! Then you have to look at the fact that he's a warmonger who keeps trying to antagonize Palestinians so he can have an excuse for another war, and he talks about covert "deniable" warfare against Iran. This asshole is going to start WW3! Fuck Gingrich!

  • Is it just me or did almost none of the glitter actually hit him?

  • @AdamSavage88 He can't win because he is a Serial Hypocrite. He can throw some red meat to Republican voters by using a few catchy words, socialism with the Obama attached to it, but we're on to him.

  • Kill this man. Somebody. Please.

    '

  • Gingrinch sure told some whoppers when he came up with two different answers to the question of why he (his 'group') was paid 1.6 million dollars from Freddie Mac/FannieMae....He claimed he wasn't lobbying ..he was a giving them "history" lessons, then his other reason they paid him a bundle was he was a "consultant." No one pays out that kind of cheddar for the two vague and unsubstantiated reasons he proffered to the press/media. Mendacity is the language of Gingrinch. Newt fail.

  • who would dare touch that horrible person gingrich makes me sick along with romney fuck gingrich i would rather have obama

  • I applaud the man glittering Newt he is right stop the anti-gay marriages. We shouldn't banned gay marriages its people like Newt who doesn't see it fit, he doesn't deserve to be President same for Barack Obama for spending our tax dollar to help for his future campaign.

  • BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

  • I would of slapped the shit off of that brown noser for Gingrich myself and send his fairy ass back to neverland!

  • Liberals prefer to assault their politicla opponents rather than debate.

    Probably because their stances don't stand up to scrutiny.

  • I would've loved it if it was battery acid

  • @Spartacus32145 you would enjoy it , if it were battery acid? and 9 other fucktards like this idea? uhmm thats attempted murder...its refreshing to see how the liberals in this country so flagrantly throw around the killing of someone they simply disagree with, its cute. why you mad? lose your job to someone more qualified? this man is the only reason clinton left office with a balanced budget. period. learn2history you ignorant liberal losers...youre a disgrace to human kind.

  • @StoptheLibs I guess me and 9 people are thinkers.. I'm actually very conservative and in the military - far from liberal. All the more reason why I hate corrupt rat pricks. Fu@# Clinton! How's that? Tell me do you enjoy rooting for someone that's blatantly the most hypocritical prick running for office? He divorced his first wife while she was in the hospital with cancer, AND he left her for his mistress... Keep rooting for douchebags.. you douchebag. StoptheLIES!! Ron Paul 2012!!

  • @StoptheLibs Yeah, unlike the fucktards you belong with, who support an asshole like Newt Gingrich who said he wanted to institute the DEATH PENALTY for people caught with two ounces of marijuana... 'cause ya know, that's not extreme or anything. You see, we're not your flavor of fucktards, because we're actually mad that this son-of-a-bitch took 1.6 million dollars from a company that WE had to bail out with our tax money. Oh, because that's not corrupt or anything, right? right...

  • @Spartacus32145

    Wow, you're really out of it aren't you?

  • @suny123boy1 Nope, quite sober and sane.  Newt sucks for more reasons than I can list in the space provided..

  • lol 

  •  I would have loved it if Newt stood up and bitch slapped him and made him clean that shit up!

  • Fun Fact, Newt's Sister is a lesbian who is married to another woman.

  • "Nice to live in a free country"... Yeah it is, Newt, so what's with the smirk and sarcasm? God you are a fucking creep, and I'm glad you'll never be president of this country. To be honest, I thought you would throw a temper tantrum like you usually do. This is the first time you've ever surprised me, you fucking crook.

  • @melbyRick really melbyRick, your still free to be as gay as you want..nobody cares how many you hold..or caress in your free time.

  • @melbyRick GOOD THING WE HAVE PEOPLE LIKE NEWT, WHO WILL ALWAYS STAND FOR DECENCY we must fill the state and federal governments with people like him

  • Stupid faggot . I hope someone beat his ass. Never mind.... he probably would of enjoyed it.

  • Fat Fuck! Hahaha! :D

  • ron paul 2012 or revolution.

  • he has somebody to dust stuff off of him?

    that is not a man

  • Time to SPARKLE!

  • thats just sad 

  • hahahahahahahaha...feel the rainbow

  • There is not a dimes worth of difference between the two US political parties. Gingbitch is a Jesuit CFR plant just like Monkey Boy Obama (666). And when has this closet faggot ever made "anti-gay" politics legislation?

  • Gays are mad, because the govt does not really recognize that contract, founded on common law, (tax exemptions, joint IRS fillings, property rights etc) between homosexuals. I would suspect that the issue would be trivial if the govt didn't give out those perks to anyone.

    Marriage is between a man and a woman, but the right to enter into that kind of a contract should be afforded to all.

  • You're a monster, Newt Gingrich.

    Your heart's an empty hole.

    Your brain is full of spiders,

    You've got garlic in your soul.

    Newt Gingrich.

    I wouldn't touch you, with a

    thirty-nine-and-a-half foot pole.

  • THIS SORRY FUCK VOTED FOR THE DEATH PENALTY FOR POT SMOKERS AND HE USED TO BE A DRUG ADDICT HIS SELF VOTE RON PAUL

  • He took that pretty well. 

  • lol. .. Newt is such a pig. he's wife doesn't even help him out. .. ..

  • Newt Gingrich has 2 chances to be elected president on Nov 6, 2012 .....those chances are slim and NONE.

    Obama is going to beat Newt Gingrich like a rented mule on Nov 6, 2012 - just as Obama crushed McCain by 10 million votes 3 years ago.

    Callista wears more make up than a circus clown.

    Newt says we will NEVER leave Afghanistan - unless it gets cancer.

    Listening to Gingrich prattle about foreign policy and constitutional rights is like listening to Casey Anthony for parenting advice.

  • @rebjiii You have to be really REALLY dumb to vote for Obama again. I know Newt is sort of a warmonger, but are you saying you'd rather vote for someone who LIED about bringing our troops back? Look, when you go to war, you need to put all resources and manpower into it and FINISH it before it becomes a drawn-out burden on the economy. Vietnam is proof of that and now Iraq is proof of that. War is never a good thing, but everyone needs to support it when it happens.

  • @MrAmputechture ...6 years from now u will look back at the 8 year Obama presidency and recognize the enormous accomplishments of Obama that forever transformed the USA for the better. It is only then that u will see how Obama saved millions of American jobs by rescuing GM & Chrysler from bankruptcy, how Obama killed Osama bin Laden in Pakistan, how Obama passed sweeping health care reform that allows uninsured Americans the option to purchase affordable health insurance

  • @rebjiii I don't think you understand how the economy works. When you have federal government bailing out companies, creating government jobs, and federal health care, those are all paid for by American tax dollars. There is absolutely no economic growth in that, and it is piling on debt. Obama has already proven his failure. The only transformation he has brought to this country is class warfare and another recession. Denying this is only fueling the poison of politics which is bias.

  • @MrAmputechture No I don't think you understand how the economy works. Listen up when the economy collapsed undoubtedly due to the Bush Administration we were faced with a decision. Bail out the auto industry and banks or face the worst economic stretch in history period. Not bailing out the banks would have killed the line of credit that every facet of the U.S. economy depends on and would have sunk the global market to such a low degree that it may not have recovered for

  • Here comes the "blame Bush" crap again. Net Employment went up by more than 1 million jobs under Bush with unemployment resting at around 5%. Under Obama, unemployment has doubled. When you look at the economic growth the Bush Administration vs Obama’s, Obama’s is completely reversed, and that’s only within his first term. Obama may speak louder, but the facts will always shine through.

  • @rar9518 These policies the republicans are pushing for to keep government out of business are not an attempt to divide the classes, but to bring productivity back to the free market. THEY are the ones bringing the ideas to the table, it is Obama who is dismissing those as “games of politics” and having the young liberals blindly eating off his table. THAT is what’s creating the class warfare.

  • @MrAmputechture In this day and age a strict and total free market is outdated. Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson agreed on this in 1912 and somehow modern Republicans still aren't getting it. A strong government is required for a strong economy that works for every individual. Notice I said strong government not overbearing government. And you're notion that the top 1% are job creators is BS 75% of jobs come from middle class men and history shows when you give that portion

  • @rar9518 A free market is not at all outdated. The private sector's share of the GDP in China has risen by 70% since their reform in the late 70's and look how well they're doing. Facts shine brighter than words, my friend. I think current data better represents our economy better than what a couple presidents said a century ago. Regarding the growing gap between classes...

  • @MrAmputechture Ok you comparing China's increase in there private sector to our economy is absolutely RIDICULOUS. China could have a quadruple increase in private sector activity right now and they still wouldn't be anywhere close to us. And facts agree with Mr. Roosevelt and Mr. Wilson why can't you? And the rich aren't spending because now they've been given such huge tax breaks they don't need to invest in businesses to make money anymore because they already make so much.

  • @MrAmputechture And the middle class doesn't know how to invest or create trade? Excuse me? Fuck off. How dare you insult the working people's intelligence, creativity, and thrift. Your elitism is sickening. Let the middle class people do what they do best create and invest. And as for your taxation and regulation B.S. Jennifer Granholm wrote a book about her governorship in Michigan during the economic crash during which she ran the stereotypical conservative government. Low

  • @MrAmputechture spending low taxes and low regulation and every business left Michigan. In the last two years of her second term she abandoned that philosophy and invested in business, ran deficits, and taxed wisely. The economy snapped back and began creating new jobs for the unemployed almost instantly. And Reagan had a spending problem. Jimmy Carter didn't. Don't even go there or I will bury you I know Ronald Reagan better than you ever could.

  • @MrAmputechture And big government has ruined business? Our government was at its high point in the 1950s and 1960s when our economy was at its best. You are simply dead wrong. And the middle class is competitive but the wealthy class gets benefits they don't and hard work can only take you so far. You seem to endorse this idea that Americans are poor and jobless because somehow it's there fault. That's despicable.

  • @rar9518 Your stats on America’s “Highest point” (whatever that means) aren’t very clear. When you look at the highest rate of FEDERAL SPENDING (if that’s what you meant by “highest point”), you need to look at the spending in relation to the nation’s GDP because the value of our nation has changed a lot over the century. The highest points in spending were during WWI, resulting in a 34% gross federal debt and Depression following, then WWII and FDR’s spending which brought federal debt to 40%.

  • @MrAmputechture Wait are you honestly trying to link Woodrow Wilson's debt and the Great Depression? Good god you need help. Look child after World War I we elected new conservative Republican leadership in the form of Harding/Coolidge. We cut spending, cut taxes, and cut regulation on all forms of business the credit markets soared for about 8 years and then the spending talked business collapsed banks called in debts and stopped lending that's the ACTUAL cause of the Great

  • @MrAmputechture Depression. Not big government if anything a lack of oversight much like what we saw in 2008 contributed to the collapse. And by the way Reagan subscribed to 20's Republicans economic ideologies in fact he implemented it and made it the basis of Republican economics. And after World War II tell me how bad was the economy? Oh wait it was awesome and you should shutup because you don't have a clue of what you're saying. And Jimmy Carter may have spent but at least

  • @MrAmputechture he offset it with decent revenue. And what makes me think a tax break will stop the top percent from investing? Ummmmmm recent history? Unless you were born yesterday you should be able to see the effects of what I'm describing. And so let me get this straight you think philanthropy offsets the rich taking home unprecedented profits rather than investing? Oh so you are mentally handicapped.

  • @MrAmputechture And the middle class doesn't know how to invest? Did you miss the era when we gave them subsidies and tax cuts and they produced at an unprecedented rate that made America the greatest economic superpower history has ever known? Actually you probably did miss it but rather than read and understand it and why it came about you're probably making uneducated assumptions about what happened which is why you're so far off in your analysis.

  • @rar9518 Then the 80s had Carter and Reagan spending ridiculously, followed by a long period of spending on the cold war, and since then, our federal debt has steadily increased to 130%, with the federal reserve covering up the debt with even more debt. We haven’t even felt the peak of the debt from Obama’s spending, and with the government bankrupt, the American people and businesses pay for the interest.

  • @MrAmputechture If I may ask for a quick break from our debating I would like to wish you and your family a Merry Christmas tomorrow. All of my comments toward you have been in the spirit of debate and I hope none have offended you.

  • @rar9518 Nah, don't bother lol. I think the debates over. You have a good Christmas as well.

  • @rar9518 The top 1% have ALWAYS had enough money to last them the lifetime. What makes you think a tax break is going to convince them to stop investing? It’s not like they’re trying to destroy the economy. They throw their money around because they know they aren’t going to use it personally. Why do you think the richest people in the country are also the greatest philanthropists? Please. This is just weak.

  • @rar9518 No, the middle class does NOT know how to invest. Are you going to prove me wrong, or are you going to dance around and call me a bad person for saying what’s true. I’m not saying that the middle class are stupid in general, but investing is a game where the middle class is at a disadvantage, not only because they don’t have as much experience with money as people who have (mostly) grown up with it, but investing is more successful the more money you have to invest with.

  • @rar9518 I’m not at all saying the jobless are to blame for not having jobs. I’m saying the government is to blame. Of course, the people who voted these politicians into office do burden some blame, this is a democracy after all, but let me make it clear that I’m not arguing to hurt anyone. I’m arguing to enlighten them on what is happening and how to fix it. These attempts to paint me a bad guy are only hurting your argument, a good analogy to what yelling at the upperclass has accomplished.

  • @rar9518 To conclude, you mentioned Reagan’s spending. Yes, Ronald Reagan was a huge spender, bigger than Jimmy, especially with the cold war, which is why I’m telling you not to criticize Reagan for his tax code, but for his spending. What makes you think I’m going to support Reagan on spending? Why are YOU criticizing spending? Your argument has lost it’s footing entirely. Bias has destroyed it, much like bias has destroyed our government. Obama would be proud of you.

  • @rar9518 You are correct in criticizing the unfairness of the gap between the middle and upper classes. That part is obvious, but you are ignoring the most important part of the equation. WHY the rich aren’t spending. The reason why the rich are holding on to their money is because the businesses are failing. They aren’t going to throw their money into a broken business, the money would flow directly to China, nor would they invest in a government that’s trillions of dollars in debt.

  • @rar9518 Investments and exports determine a company’s ability to grow, and that is why I say the 1% (whom almost all are investors with the exception of celebs who may or may not know how to handle money) are job creators because the middle class does not know how to invest or trade. When you make a business more expensive with over taxation and regulation, investors would rather invest in China, or ironically, in Treasury Bills, so that they can make money off of Obama’s ludicrous spending.

  • @rar9518 I am not going to take sides with Bush on spending. When a government spends money, they create deficit. Obama created a record-breaking breaking deficit with record breaking spending in his first year. The businesses suffer from government’s mistakes by paying higher taxes. They raise prices/lower budget and become undesirable to international traders (or anybody, for that matter).

  • @rar9518 Regarding the economy during Reagan’s presidency, the Reagan tax cuts immensely stimulated tax-payer spending for both the upper class. IRS data reports that tax revenue for the top 1% rose from 17.6% to 27.5% 1981-1988. The problem with Reagan’s tax cuts is not the tax code itself, but that Reagan couldn’t get rid of the spending habits imposed by the Carter Administration before it. Federal Spending during tax cuts only creates more debt; far worse than spending with higher taxes.

  • @rar9518 The money won’t trickle down into a broken system, but in a system with less limitations and taxes; a system without drilling regulations, so our oil is cheaper and our exports are more affordable; a system where businesses thrive without having an oversized government to compete with. You need to understand that the beginning of this equation does not start with “the rich are too wealthy”. The beginning of the equation starts with “big government has ruined the business environment”.

  • @rar9518 To conclude, you mention the suffering the American people are about to go through. I think the American people need to get more competitive. The people who are not able to keep up with the growing competition are going to HAVE to settle with a lower income job. I know it may sound emotionally unappealing to you, but what seems even more immoral to me is passing the debt to the next generation with the spending we’re doing currently.

  • @MrAmputechture of Americans a tax break or subsidizing than the economy picks up the pace significantly then when a tax cut is given solely to the rich. And the rich haven't spent the money government has given them the past 30 years they've padded there own wealth personal wealth for the top 1% has quadrupled! Meanwhile the average Americans wealth has remained stagnant. That's why under Reagan we had 5 million more people under the poverty line at the end of his term than in

  • @MrAmputechture the beginning and that trend continued under both Bush presidents. And government jobs don't help the economy? Even your own party has proven that wrong George W. Bush ballooned the federal government for 5 years and the unemployment numbers in America stayed low thanks to that expansion even though the private sector was getting destroyed on a yearly basis. And hard work is simply no longer the only solution to unemployment or success. Sorry Republicans are all

  • @MrAmputechture for pulling yourselves up by your bootstraps but most Americans don't have a boot to begin with. Without government subsidies for certain areas of the economy, funding for social programs, and public schools no one has a chance to do anything therefore an active federal government constantly attempting to give Americans the tools and opportunities for success is the best choice. And ok say we let Chrysler fail. What do we say to the millions of workers who lost

  • @MrAmputechture there jobs because of policies they had no say in making. Same with people who lose there homes to bad credit deals. What do you say to them when they got taken advantage of by a bank just trying to earn a profit by implementing bad lending policies the federal government could have prevented them from implementing? I don't let that person die. That's why I regulate that bank to hold them accountable to the consumer and provide a social safety net for those who

  • @MrAmputechture fall on hard times. I don't want an America where 80% of the population is constantly getting screwed over by the other 20%. Or the 1% is constantly getting benefits at the 99% expense because there's a microscopic chance that .1% of that benefit I gave to the 1% might just trickle down to the 99%. I want an America that gives everyone a fair and equal chance at success and enables everyone to get a fair deal from this country and this government because that's

  • @MrAmputechture what America is all about and that's what America represents. We're a country by, for and of the people. How can anyone sleep at night voting for policies that misrepresent the majority of the people's interests?

  • @rar9518 I don’t think the wealthiest in the world should be burdened with taxes. If you want a “fair tax”, 0% corporate tax IS a fair tax because they deserve to spend their own money. Obama is proof that the government doesn't know how to spend. The upper 1% that everyone hates spend money on business growth, investing in the cars and ipods that you use, creating your jobs. The more you tax them, the more you hurt the job creators for the middle class.

  • @rar9518 Government Jobs do NOT help the economy because you are taking spending away from the taxpayers and job creators themselves in favor of federal spending. The federal government does not know how to spend their money, and it is better to let the economy flow naturally and freely. Let hard work and competition decide which jobs survive, not the government spending with YOUR money, because it makes absolutely no sense to gain economic growth by paying for your own job.

  • @rar9518 Regarding bailouts, Chrysler needed bailouts because they could not keep up with their competition. Not only does federal spending hurt the tax payers/job creators, but it hurts Chrysler's competition as well. Where one business fails, another grows. I say let the failing businesses fail. The bandaids don’t last very long when the government is taxing them to get rid of the debt they obtain from spending too much.

  • @rar9518 Regarding “what side I’m on”, I think it’s THAT attitude that’s ruining politics. I don’t have a side. I don’t see myself as a 1% nor do I ever want to be. I just think that trust in the wealthy will benefit both the middle and upperclass. Money takes responsibility- knowing where to spend it and how to protect its value. The wealthy minority knows how to do that. The middle class majority does not, and they need to admit that they don’t and bring freedom back to the market.

  • @MrAmputechture decades. You think 8% unemployment is tragic? Try 30 or 40%. And ok say we don't bailout the auto industry. We lose not only the millions of jobs that the auto industry provides but also the jobs it indirectly provides which is due to its utilization of American resources and American equipment. That's another few million jobs. With your economic policies unemployment is very realistically up over 40%. Good job.

  • @rar9518 ...where were your debt concerns in 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 when GWB and cheney were deficit spending while squandering hundreds of billions in iraq chasing after hussein's imaginary wmds ??....if your pathetic tea party mob had any credibility it would have been formed in 2003 or 2004 or 2005 or 2006 or 2007 or 2008 .....instaed of waiting to form in 2009 - when a black man moved into a white house.....8 years of GWB crap and malfeasance cant be cleaned up in 34 months

  • @rebjiii Woahhhh there you're misunderstanding me I completely agree with you. 100%. I'm not a tea partier not even close. I'm a stone cold Democrat and proud of it.

  • @rar9518 ...i am sorry i misunderstood you comment - fight the good fight vs bachmann, beck, cantor, ryan and perry and the rest of the ignorant tea party mob

  • @rebjiii It's a fight our side will win. The mob of conservatism will be thrown back as it was in 1912, 1932, and 1964. We're liberals. Our tradition is long and proud. We have names like Roosevelt (both of them), Lincoln, Wilson, Kennedy, and Johnson to stand behind our legacy. We will triumph and every American will soon enjoy the same fair, square, and new deals our ancestors enjoyed.

  • @MrAmputechture And look as for creating government jobs the federal government has shrank under this administration according to every independent study and even so creating government jobs in a depression is EXACTLY what you're supposed to do according to every economic theory dating back to the Great Depression. And no economic growth? It's not unemployment is shrinking or anything. What world do you live in?

  • @MrAmputechture And as for piling on debt I'm so sorry Obama has had to fight two Bush wars and bail out his god awful economy. I'm sorry I guess Obama shouldn't spend a dime and leave every working class American to fend for himself because historically that's NEVER gone wrong right? I mean aside from the crashes of 1802, 1819, 1837, 1879, 1888, 1907, and the Great Depression it's been just perfect.

  • @MrAmputechture And Obama is waging class warfare? Are you nuts? Republicans have adopted policies that have taken the tax burden away from the wealthy, reward wealth over work, and created loopholes that enable the rich to avoid paying there fair share. The average middle class worker meanwhile can hardly get through tech support in India where the outsourced American Dream is thriving. Just curious but if this is a class warfare who's side are you on?

  • Who's the bitch that said "what a creeper."? Just go away.

  • vote for Newt!

  • @imbonnie Vote for someone who Cheat's on his wife who has Cancer??? and takes money from Freddie Mac?? This guy is good at 1 thing talking.. I forgive but i don't forget

  • Perhaps our military should give gays bags of rainbow glitter to fight the enemy.. That outta purge gays from the military right quick. LOL

  • One Hedge Fund Manager made $5 BILLION DOLLARS last year

    That's more'n the GDP of 50 different nations & more'n the combined salaries of everyone who ever played for the New York Yankees

    And yet b/c of the Bush tax he only pays an income tax rate of 15%

    The maid who scrubs the shit out of his toliet pays a higher rate

    Newt supports Paul Ryan's tax plan which will reduce his tax rate to ZERO!

    THIS LOSS IN GOVT REVENUE WILL HAVE TO BE MADE UP W/ MAJOR CUTS IN SOCIAL SECURITY AND MEDICARE

  • I'm voting for him, because if Obama is president again, our economic system will be destroyed and all this "Please wipe my ass" crap needs to stop. The younger generation should work hard, and let the future generation live off of what they earned from being successful. Sure sometimes unemployment is neccessary and so are taxes, but taxing the rich means less jobs for the poor, because the rich have no money to give from over taxation.

  • Am I the only who noticed the cheez-itz box?

  • newt you deserve a heck of a lot more than that u POS!

  • This Gingrich should be shamed of himself. He's a poor excuse for a politician, let a long wanting to be President, haha, don't make me laugh. It's clear he's a crook and works to improve for the CEO's rather then us little people. The clear winner is Ron Paul so fuck off Gingrich let the real man take over you fake.

  • This video made my fucking day !! to funny want to see what Newt's about watch the video click my name if you can handle 50,000 things this evil prick did!!

  • How is this clown surging in any poll? Which idiots would actually vote for this fat rich globalist? Doesn't make sense. If you want more of the same he's your man, if not then Ron Paul 2012

  • Callista will make a fine First Lady.

  • that should have been gas

  • He works great under pressure! Newt 2012!

  • :06 newts face... he thought he was going to be assassinated

  • newt just goes where the money goes.. RON PAUL 2012

  • thats too funny

  • "The Gingrinsh that stole Christmas!!! "

  • @chris03653837 Good one lol-make a video before someone else does.

    Newt for President!

  • starting at 0:42 sandusky appeared

    

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • It is time for Americans to have a third party because the republic party is a party for the dumb asses so for democracy to work you should have another new party

  • @adsvert A third-party candidate, such as Ron Paul, would virtually guarantee the re-election of Obama. The 18% of the vote that Ross Perot got in the 1992 election ensured the defeat of Bush 41, which I suspect was Perot's intent.

  • @adsvert what about the democratic party?