In Israel we have a powerful religious basis and national identity. It certainly creates more challenge to subvert Israel on some ground. The bad winds are mostly from extreme left wing organization that receive funds from EU or Europeans countries such as Norway for so called Peace promotion. It is difficult to subvert Israeli to commit state treason versus Arab countries were the myth of all powerful Israeli intelligence wreck horror and mutual mistrust.
É. O video é de decadas atras, mas o que ele disse esta parecendo os dias atuais do Brasil. A minoria homo-ditadores ganhando espaço e poder no governo e atacando a todo o custo a religião judaico-cristão.
Notice that he is saying that religion and faith are the way to combat ideological subversion. Wisely, he does not specify WHAT religion or WHICH religion (if any that currently even exist).
New religions can be made. Better religions - that are not intrinsically oppressive or violent but of which are open to new information, that are adaptive by design and which draw from the best of the current religions AND from science to help all humanity better ourselves by beneficent ways and means.
You stop demoralization with religion? Not necessarily. As Yuri said himself, religions too(and clergies in particular) are not immune to subversion and demoralization. But you can stop demoralization wit MORAL values. Religions CAN help with moral values - but better than just religion is faith and moral values and you don't need religions for that. Communists are not afraid of religions, but they are scared of faith and traditional moral values and so they do their utmost to smear them.
not religion, but common conciosness is the key, because religions are deviding people for centuries. nevertheless, im surprised by the width and profundity of this guy's knowledge!
India is the most sexually corrupt society on earth. Kama Sutra anyone? The USA got corrupted when the hippies went to India in the '60s looking for enlightment but instead came back with Free Love, man.
@indiasucksalways Kama Sutra was intended for married couples, and didn't deal only with sex, but with social norms of behavior. Today the West is 100 times more degenerate in sexual behavior than the most exotic societies of the East. Even though Bollywood is a giant movie industry, can you find the Indian porn? Can you find sex scenes in mainstream Bollywood movies?
@hermitcleric Yes. And Yes. The internet is full of Indian porn. Just google it. Even between married couples, some of the shit Kama Sutra advocates is nasty.
@hermitcleric Come on, it's all over India. You can't pick up an Indian periodical without seeing articles about sex all over the place. Give me a break. All they think about is sex. India has a higher AIDS rate than Africa for crying out loud.
Indias culture and way of life is being systemically dismantled just like ours. Its the NWO restructuring the world. They cannot build a new world without first destroying the old...
@hermitcleric seems like people like to ask stupid question on try to find were he is wrong....when even if 5% of his talk is true we are fucket up badly.The story fits 100% last 20 years of Bulgaria......100fuckign % and the hero (old social dictator
If this was a movie, it would be great with a lousy ending. Yes, it's nice to know religion used to be a great instrument, but the reality is that the instrument was only valid in times when we needed something to explain things we did not understand yet. If you think the earth is flat and don't know where the lightning in the sky is coming from, religion works much better. Inevitably, its role will deteriorate. So it is no answer to anything. An answer would be a moral replacement for religion.
Fascinating talk this. What I like is that back in 1983 he uses nothing more than chalk and a blackboard to illustrate his talk whereas now most lecturers use a digital slide projector. Yet this guy gets his point across very well. I am impressed he can hopld an audience.
I am a large skeptic of things, and I have to say I'm slightly convinced of this guys lecture; it just seems to make sense. There's no proof of things like this you can get, and it's obviously not paranoid conspiracy theory, he's predicted the exact thing that's been happening, but back in 1983. There's credibility in that. My only thought is not to bring back religion, but to make an ethics code for atheists that they can subscribe to, one with logical arguments. I think this would unify us.
Evidences supporting this can be heard in the part from this lecture I labeled "part IIa". Bring "back" religion is itself a flaw. What people call "atheism" today is a religion better described as evolutionary materialism. One cannot derive an ethics code from a materialist worldview or cosmology because matter does not have ethics, nor does the Darwinist selection. In fact, social Darwinism (a.k.a. III Reich eugenics) were derived by Darwin himself from the apparent logic of selection.
Refer to "The Descent of Man..." by Darwin. If there's no transcendental judgement of one's actions, then will is "all of the law". Nietzsche got the atheist ethics with relative precision, precisely because he was enough of a nutcase to advocate it. Any ethics curbing one's will must be logically separate from the materialist cosmology, which means that materialists and modern Darwinists will have to seek the principles for ethics outside matter, denying their cosmology.
The BNP is for bringing in non-Whites to rape your White women and destroy your cities, just like every other party! If Brits don't stop supporting nonsense like the BNP your country will be a Muslim and non-White shithole with Whites dead or enslaved. Forget the BNP, support the Insurgent and save the White race!
Religion is very important in a way that it hold back the ignorant and often "stupid" masses from being channeled in some destrucitve ideologies threatening the current order of a society.
The point there is it being immaterial thus highly difficult to attack in opposition with material ideology as communism.
Of course it doesn't mean a religion is better for the good of all than any other moronic ideology.
In some aspects, the masses need to be held back by fears and authorities, like the fear from Hell, because one cannot expect to bring the masses up to the level of rational arguments.
On the other hand, who said contemporary evolutionary materialism is rational, and not another moronic ideology? Also, if the intellectual elite decays morally due to materialism, so will the people, which is exactly what is happening.
Anyway, Lenin said that even the most "reactionary, bourgeoisie materialism" is useful to the Marxist strategy, as long as it "is essential for our struggle against the predominating religious obscurantists". Therefore, ANY atheist militant is a useful idiot to Marxist-Leninist strategy, and comrade Lenin knows the final fate of useful idiots. The clock is ticking.
See "On the Significance of Militant Materialism" by Lenin.
Sure, religion is capable of holding society together. So is military dictatorship and several FUCKED UP things as well. If these are the only ways of holding society together we are able to come up with, then society is NOT WORTH holding together at all. We might just as well revert back to animals with pea-sized brains and an average lifespan of a couple months. Fuck it all
Revert specifically back to apes, along with the other atheists that complained in this final part of the lecture. And no, dictatorship by itself is not able to hold society together, or else Rome or Egypt wouldn't have fallen. Religionless dictatorship is just the final stage before collapse, anarchy and replacement by a new worldview.
I was raised by White Russian emigres who were anti-Soviet. Most of them have fled Bolshevism in 1919 and a few years later. They were members of an anti-Soviet organization called Norodnoi Trudovoi Soyuz (NTS) which published Posev, and Grani. My uncle, Dr. Poremsky help initiate Radio Liberte and Radio Free Russia in Frankfurt Maine, Germany. My parents had Soviet exchange students come over and we haded them anti-Soviet literature to take back. I recorded subversive music for them.
This man speaks the truth. Im glad I found his discourse on this subject. I surely hope all are able to discern it for themselves. For your sake at least.
You can sit up here and watch this man clearly showcasing the undisclosed criminal corruption of the world, and still believe anything that the system concocts. Is it just coincidental that the world elite have been pledging allegiance to the same God for centuries? All dedicating their life work to sacrificially honoring the one who has granted and promised them power? No one ever seems to turn their focus to the Luciferians, they just choose to attack the one that internally attacks them. =D
You honestly sound more inclined to commit violence just in your general resistance to accept something as pure as God. I just have one question for you. With the world as thoroughly flawed as it is; how flawed would it be, if people just simply followed the rules that the Bible details? Would there be issues if everyone followed the Bible? No there wouldn't be. The only thing flawed, is man! The moment you inject an outside theory to substitute Gods word then that's where all things corrupt.
Hell of a series. It even changed my mind a bit on the role of religion in society, and I'm a Christian and a libertarian. Interesting stuff to think about.
One major item that he miss though is the intentional dumbing down of the majority population by forcing all to think on the same level as the population group with the lowest IQ. This group and its behavior is marketed as cool and desirable, even though it displays primitive behavior and even criminal acts as the core values.
I wouldn't say blacks, because black is just a skin color, which is accidental. One can be black and well educated. I would say hip hop, "nigga" or ghetto subculture, or even gang subculture in some cases. It is truly disgusting the way MTV glamourizes things as low as pimps and "hoes", but this is included in the moral relativity part, and don't forget this is a 1983 lecture. Back then, ghetto subculture was not as promoted as today.
Skin color occidental? Skin color, length, feet size and IQ are all absolute and a direct result of the genes passed down from the parents. Skin color is an indicator of a persons racial traits.
In Sweden the population was basically homogeneous up until the late 80's. So even though they fucked up schooling and police in the 60's the IQ did not drop and crime did not increase. So they imported massive numbers of primitives to enable Sweden to enter the destabilization phase.
Wrong. 75% of a persons IQ are based on genes. The remaining 25% include natural deviation and environmental influences. And just as skin color it is hereditary. If skin color where just random there would be people of all colors everywhere.
yep, thats another, and to many very bothersome, truth; there has been 30 years of IQ testing with all kinds of controls for environment and so forth and the results are almost totally constant to a percent or even tenth of a percent.
In Sweden IQ is very high today even for Western standards. So what? IQ and schooling do not prevent a society from collapsing. What keeps a society together is common sense, common laws from common beliefs, however primitive. Wake up! You are being taken over by Islam, and their IQ is quite lower than Europe's, but they have a cosmic view, common laws and common sense, and you don't, and unless you have it, you'll lose. Lose with a high IQ, but that's just Game Over with high IQ.
I have woken up, that's what I said in my first comments. All of western society is being destroyed by political correctness and mass immigration of primitives according to the marxist plan.
And I am working quite hard here on YT and other places to get people to realize this and vote for the parties that will break this development. Parties that stand for reality, unity and freedom.
And this movement is obviously not part of the subversion as it is hated in all media.
So you're voting Independent, then? Because any other party just encourages "group think" to some degree. It's sad but true. I thought about being Libertarian for a while, maybe even joining the Constitutional party, but for now I haven't found any existing political party that didn't have some rather nasty ideas hiding in the wings.
There is no "Independent" to vote for in Sweden... The biggest party to the right of the middle (economically) got 200 votes in the last elections.
I vote for the party that base most of their politics on reality as opposed to basing them on fantasies as most other parties do. <- A choice that just shows how sick Swedish politics are.
blacks have been used as tools for communists. it isn't because there is something "inherently" wrong with them as a people. The negative aspects of their culture has been cultivated and agitate to keep our society (black AND white existing together) from being cohesive.
There is nothing wrong with blacks or arabs, it's just that their natural IQ level is much lower and thus have less control over the primitive urges. Meaning they are more likely to commit crimes.
No unified society with mixed races have been stable during the entire history of mankind. Ethic conflict and chaos have ALWAYS become the end result. The marxists know this and use them for this purpose, but no agitation is needed, they create the conflict automatically by being themselves.
But IQ has nothing to do with morality. Often times people with retardation are happy and friendly. There are dumb criminals but the ones that do the most damage have very high IQ's.
Humble God-serving people do not control or exploit others. I'd rather be among Christians then some Godless scientists working to make their world more 'efficient'. Many important scientists and doctors have been Jews and Christians. Commies don't want you to think about that, though.
Retardation is not part of the natural IQ span. It is often caused by developmental errors or other brain damage. One can make an interesting note that while IQ 70 is the retardation level for whites, it is well within the natural IQ span of blacks in USA (85) and higher then the IQ of blacks in Africa (67).
Morality is a social construct
The FACT is that religious people are FAR more inclined to commit crime and engage in what society considers 'immoral' acts then atheists.
A religious person can afford to waste his life in prison because he believe that his soul has eternal life. An atheist knows that this is the only life he got and the only time his self will exist
Sweden as the most secularized free country had close to zero crime.
Actually, your crime is going up in Sweden because of Muslim immigrants in that country. So, crime is going up. Secularism of the soul would lead to unhappiness and filling that void with religion is why man created religion, so that we have some reassurance that we going to go somewhere pleasant when we die or some comfort knowing our souls will be reborn.
I was more comfortable when I was an atheist, because I didn't face the idea of Hell. This "religious comfort" story is absolute baloney, except for new age fake religions that deny the idea of Hell and assure universal salvation.
Hey, your ancestors had fill a void somehow. Your ancestors worshiped spirits because they wanted some comfort when they died or agony if they screwed up. That's how ancient peoples thought. There were no atheists in a ancient times, at least that I'm aware of. He's saying that lack of religion leads to decline and lack of morals. Morals are derived from religion. You swear an oath on the Bible every time you're in court. You swear to tell the truth to a divine power swearing the highest oath.
This is how the atheist mythology works: first, man evolved from a primate or monkey, which does not have the idea of God, THEN the charlatans invented religion, and all our ancestors were dumb enough to buy it. And now we don't need it anymore, because NOW we have skepticism and the scientific method. All these assumptions and their variations are either historically false, unproven or absurd, so atheists just cling to them by faith because it's required by their worldview.
People will still always worship religion. People in caves wrote on walls and worshiped gods. Science can't explain everything like when people mysteriously heal after being horrifically injured for example. They don't know what happened so they use religious terms like a miracle to describe it for example. The Vatican embraces science and has an observatory outside Rome. Something unheard of in Galileo's day. Our ancestors didn't think they were stupid . That's all they knew.
Read up on your psychology. IQ is not an accurate measure of intelligence cross-culturally, and certainly not racially (for starters, we're GENETICALLY the SAME RACE. Seriously, man, do your homework)...
An example of this would be the differentials in other forms of mental aptitude which pertains to muscle control, agility, response time, etc. As well as the fact that a pattern-based test only works if the test-taker is exposed to same or similar patterns as the test-giver.
"Race" is no longer a word that can describe anything specific as everyone have their own definition of that it means.
That we are genetically similar is irrelevant as we have nothing else to compare with. The traits that govern other things then intelligence can still be quite different between "population groups", so why would intelligence be a special case in which all humans have the same capabilities?
IQ is a measurement of an individuals capability to see patterns and solve problems (intelligence) in relation to the rest of the population.
Science is a system of acquiring knowledge based on the scientific method. The scientific method consists of the collection of data through observation and experimentation, and the formulation and testing of hypotheses.
Morality is a social construct and can thus change when society change.
Yes, outlaw all organized religion as fraud. But since it is a human right to think and express whatever you want people can still be as religious as they wish. The difference will be that there would be no authoritarian organizations telling people what to think.
The organization that would outlaw religion would necessarily not only be telling us that organized religion is fraud, but it would do it in such a way to criminalize anyone that thinks different. And also, in order to do it, this organization would have to be stronger than any organized religion. So we are talking about a strong authoritarian regime imposing an anti-clergy worldview as LAW. Am I supposed to keep taking this (supposedly) libertarian nonsense seriously?
Have you had any recent encounters with the public school system recently? Because last time I checked they were pretty dead-set on eliminating religious practice from schools and secularizing the younger generations' common worldview.
Of course, this is the New World Order agenda, planned decades (centuries?) ago and currently executed by aligned governments. Every single Western government today is aligned to the NWO to a certain degree. And some people think this has something to do with "freedom". I believe the NWO is purely destructive, just as the ideals of the French Revolution, meaning that it's not sustainable as a cultural cycle. Another culture, another religion will necessarily take over.
Bearing in mind, of course, that a "religion" does not always go by cover of that name... in a faithless vacuum you're more likely to find a cult of personality springing up than a traditional spiritually involved religion.
But organized or no, I do agree that the world seems to be moving in an increasingly uniform direction. Either it'll reach a breaking point and fracture or we'll all fall together. Buckle your seatbelts, folks!
You mean the rule of the caesars? This is the stage that comes after mobocracy, and it's the final stage before the fall and the coming of a new cultural cycle. The caesars are decadent and they themselves demoralize the people even more, because everybody knows that they are not gods, but even still they must bow before them, resulting in widespread cynicism, which was the case of the Soviet people.
Not at all. What is needed is to have a democratically elected government make a law that label organized religion as any other fraud. Meaning: "The practice of telling other people that an unknown is the absolute truth and basing an organization around this unprovable claim."
The weakest police force is by definition stronger then any organized religion.
Clergy that keeps practicing their fraud will of course be treated as the criminals they are.
And since the existence of God is proven in metaphysics, and the materialist claim is impossible and requires blind faith (I'm not going to demonstrate it here via YouTube comments), your so-called democracy would be a democratically elected tyranny (like many were) imposing its own worldview, your false claim of unprovability, millenia-long rebutted phylosophycal errors like materialism, empiricism and skepticism, and criminalizing the dissidents as enemies (or "opiate") of the people.
Scurck - what you are describing eerily resembles the policies of the French Revolution, which, if you've read up on your history, was one of the most senseless periods of bloodshed and tyranny in European history.
Additionally: organized religion, not necessarily having governmental authority, is not in itself criminal. The crime, as you say, would indeed pertain to all "practices of telling other people than an unknown is the absolute truth and basing an organization around this".
And yet, you suggest such an action -- by criminalizing a belief system one organization, (humanist, secular, based in Reason though it may be) simply lays claim to an "absolute truth". In this case, that "absolute truth" would be the arrogant idea that said organization Knows Better than anyone belonging to a religion. Therefore, they are denying others the right to think for themselves and basing their organization around an unprovable claim.
The non-existence of things do not need proof. The claim of the existence of something need to be able to prove its claim. If it can not be proven and the claimers still insist it exist and make others believe it as well, then it is a fraud, a scam - a crime.
An atheist does not claim the truth of anything.
The non-existence of god/santa claus/big foot is the truth until you can prove otherwise.
The argument of non-proof-of-inexistence is the weakest of all and I never use it, because it applies to the pink unicorn, flying spaghetti monster, Santa and all this stuff.
"An atheist does not claim the truth of anything."
Ye olde skeptical argument. So, IS IT TRUE that an atheist doesn't claim the truth of anything?
How nice, and how does the French revolution (against tyranny and corruption) compare to the inquisition and witch burnings that religion has brought us?
Sure, it would include all sects and other organizations making money from scamming people, like astrology and fortune telling.
Did you miss the part where revolutionaries started killing people without discretion simply because they were associated with a certain "outgroup" (les aristos, calotins, etc)? They slaughtered massive numbers of non-threatening women, children, nuns and clergy - simply for the crime of their birth and for holding to their beliefs. This was done in the name of Reason. Such atrocities are not the fault of religion, but of human cruelty and imagination.
The French revolution has killed in one year more people than the Inquisition killed in 4 centuries. As for witch-hunts, you should know that the Church was against witch burning because a Christian cannot believe in actual witchery, while the old pagan religions not only believed in it, but were all for persecution of so-called witches. So, the Church was trying to STOP the European people from burning "witches". The protestants brought this scourge back and now people blame it on "the Church".
Not really following the "cannot believe in actual witchery" bit... because, um, it does exist. Just because it's the work of the enemy doesn't make it non-existant. HOWEVER, the intense persecution of those who invoke spirits for various and sundry purposes is unethical.
It is not for anyone to pass judgment on this earth. That's up to God (for those who don't believe in God, call it what you will) but in any case, the "fault" of such behavior is in the people instituting persecution and false judgment. It's not a direct result of an entire religious movement.
Organized atheism IS a scam. Why should one think that the materialism, empiricism and evolutionism that base modern atheism are respectable and non-contradictory ideas? They aren't. They are just blind and wish-it-were beliefs in properties of matter that matter itself does not have, and skepticism crowns all this as a shield from unwanted questions, deemed as "irrelevant" from its pedestal of superiority.
@Scurck against a tyranny its acceptable,against a dictatorship/monarchy its not that acceptable.BUT ONE IS TO REBEL AND ANOTHER IS TO KILL LIKE A MAD ANIMAL LIKE THE FRENCH DID
@themasterofbots Romans 13:1 "Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God. 2 Therefore whoever resists the authorities resists what God has appointed, and those who resist will incur judgment."
---
The French there oppressed by retarded kings and religion. They rose up against their oppressors and killed those who had done them wrong.
@Scurck men chose leaders but to their deserving.If people are too dumb to find good ones(or replace them by execution when necesarry) then yes,we deserve what we get.And yes that verset is sort of dumb.But remember that theres a diffrence between a leader and a tyrant.A leader loves his country and his interest is to preserve it and his people while a tyrant.......
So you kill people who work on the sabbath and believe that gravity is a false scientific theory since the bible say it is angels who are holding everything down?
@Scurck on nothing exactly like the thing on which atheist base their ethics :).So they are not trustful as they have no reason to uphold their word or act morally
You can not ask a question about what relation a non-something have with a totally unrelated subject and expect a proper answer.
I am an Objectivist, thus I base my actions on reason and my relation to the world around me. You know, the thing we call REALITY. This is of course a far better and superior base of ethics then an old book that commands you to kill people who work on the sabbath...
"now a hard one for you.On what do atheist base their ethics ?"
not a hard one in my opinion.
Same as religious believers....On their own(personal belief) or from others(others who transcripted the so-called book of life; the bible, preachers who interpret the bible).
Isn't the bible some kind of propaganda itself, maybe call it propaganda of GOD
What is to say that everything we think is gods moral, isn't it possible it's a moral-belief that come from within ourselves?
@kukhufvud ever wondered why there's an incresing number of sociopaths ?It's quite an epidemic out there.Also,many people would do nasty things if religion didn't keep them in check.In religion your brother is your equal,in atheism,you are God
Great and correct description of our current reality (we are just before the crisis phase). Noting that he said this 26 years ago gives this theory extreme weight, but I absolutely do not agree with the shit about religion. Enlightened people with a free mind do not need superstitions in their lives.
Before I saw this I had already detected all the things he describe in the society around me and I also had them connected in some way but have not really been able to see the source of it all.
So get rid of religion and see what happens, Brainiac. Shafarevich stated a hard fact about cultural cycles, and the strengthening of atheism, positivism, materialism, skepticism and other philosophical crap is the sign of the end of a dying cultural cycle, to be replaced by another positive theology and cosmology, not by some nice enlightenment which atomizes the society into mobocracy or ochlocracy, which is analogous to the destabilization stage.
Do you think the idea that the universe is all that exists is new or only widespread now? This is wishful thinking, just in order to hide the fact that atheism and materialism atomize societies since the dawn of men, through decadent Greece, decadent Rome. You THINK we know a lot about reality because one writes a mathematical formula to decribe a phenomenon, and ergo reality works that way. Atheists and free society are incompatible, like in Republican Spain. Read Shafarevich's book.
As already stated, no historical society had the internet and at no time in history have the free thinking societies had such a vast superiority in power over the non-thinking peoples.
Science does not dictate reality. Science are really, really good guesses about how reality works, and all science can be replaced by better theories.
I am an Objectivist, so I would rather see society ruled by the best suited. And I reject all altruistic ideologies.
Scurck- "Before I saw this I had already detected all the things he describe in the society around me and I also had them connected in some way but have not really been able to see the source of it all."
And you still chose to be a bonehead anyway. Accept Christ.
I prefer to face reality instead of basing my life on silly superstitions.
Never in the entire history of mankind had there been any kind of proof for any god, ghost, soul, demon, spirit, troll, gnome or anything supernatural.
Jesus was a fictional character and the roots of most stories in the bible can be traced to far older religions and belief systems.
Organized religions should be illegal and labeled for what it is >>> fraud.
I'm terribly sorry for you and I'll pray for you. If it's proof you're waiting for, then all you have to do is die to find it. It's always the spiritually blind that tread through life searching for the fossil of Christ. The evidence for God is all around us, the miracle of his creation is in every living thing and every intelligent living structure. You truly have to be seeking the Lord in order to find him. Not for reasons not to believe. Have a gday!
Fine, waste your time on that instead of corrupting the minds of people around you.
What is all around us and in every living thing is the clear and undeniable evidence for a natural universe without any spiritual influence.
"You truly have to be seeking almighty Odin in order to find him. You surely must be spiritually blind to not see his hand in all existence from when he created the world from the parts of the giant Ymir..." <- your arguments are just as silly.
God is reality, therefore you face God. The God you are opposed to is a straw-man figure that lacks all the eight characteristics of God described by St. Thomas Aquinas. Anyway, have you ever studied seriously the history of miracles, like the one in Fatima? All the skeptical explanations for this miracle are plain pathetic. Last year the body of St. Pius of Pietrelcina was exhumed after 40 years and it was absolutely incorrupt, caught on tape and film.
There are no history of miracles as no true miracle has ever happened.
Fatima... some kids talking crap = a miracle? LOL!!!
In 1719 a man was found perfectly preserved in a Swedish mine. He had been missing for 40 years. The naturalist Carolus Linnaeus found out that it was a natural process from the conditions in the mine...
You just showed that you don't even know about the miracle of the Sun, so I assume your answer to my question is no, as I expected. I know atheists by heart: I used to be one. By that time I didn't study miracles simply because I didn't care, I thought it was all fake, just like you.
And these same conditions coincidentally happened to St. Pius and many other saints that are buried in the most diverse conditions. How frequently are we expecting to see coincidences, anyway?
What is miraculous about the sun? Is is a big ball of plasma who burns with thermonuclear fusion. Just like any other star in the entire universe.
You do know that there exist quite big rewards for people who can prove that ANYTHING supernatural exist? So how come that no one has ever been able to claim the rewards?
Willful ignorance is the worst crime a sentient being can commit towards itself. If you are a christian you should follow the eight commandment and stop lying to yourself.
I am post-graduate in astrophysics. Thanks for the class, Brainiac. You are just making a public statement of ignorance by not even acknowledging what was claimed and witnessed by tens of thousands of people in Fatima. I'm not going to supply you with knowledge you should have before trying to discuss Fatima with me. YOU are a willful ignorant.
Prove something supernatural exists by using natural means, like measuring equipment? The PREMISE is absurd. The supernatural is LOGICALLY proved.
Oh yeah, and I am an astronaut writing this on the surface of Mars...
So, what is miraculous about the sun?
Mass hysteria is not uncommon when religion is involved. And Christianity has no monopoly of such claims of miracles either. Either ALL miracles of ALL religions are true (which makes the christian claim even more silly), or none of the miracles are true...
PROVING something by logic alone? LOL! Your claim only shows that you have no concept of the scientific method.
There's nothing miraculous about the Sun itself. I never claimed that in any way.
The theories of mass hysteria and mass hallucination in Fatima were ruled out by psychology experts. Like I said, you are totally unaware of the problem.
The principle of identity and the existence of absolute truth are proven logically in an irrefutable way (apodictic). The scientific method, when used, relies on logic and metaphysical premises, but it can also be an idol to people such as yourself.
Marxism and religion have something in common: they are both cosmic visions. The thing about marxism is that it is the gospel of materialism with a future of welfare on Earth, not in Heaven. One of its premises is the achievement of the End of History ON Earth, which is plain absurd. Aynrandist individualism, on the other had, is just an atomizing force. Not a single civilization on Earth was based on freedom. A "Thelemic" society is a joke under the civilizational aspect.
What marxism and religion have in common is that both use the lie of altruism to commit rape on the human mind and impose authoritarian rule over the people. Both demand that the individual sacrifice his own life to them and claim this to be good.
Only a modern society with the freedoms we have now could evolve into a truly free society. And it would of course be atheist, not "thelemic"...
Freedom cannot be the founding principle of anything coherent due to the accidental nature of will. A society is necessarily exclusive of certain acts, therefore there's no such thing as a free society. It's just a verbal fetish. Your complaint is not with marxism or religion, but with any sort of civilizational cosmic view. Correction: any, except yours. Let's not forget who's willing to make religion illegal IN THE NAME OF FREEDOM, but, like I said, freedom is just a verbal fetish to you.
I disagree slightly on the religious part. I think mainstream religion can be subverted as well. He knows that the mainstream churches in America became very open to liberalism, feminism, political correctness, open borders, etc. And this was over 20 years ago when he gave this lecture..some denominations today accept homosexuality.
Even if some born-again congregation is very conservative, they are usually very Zionist and pro-open borders.
You are correct in many ways. Why, the first subversion to Christianity in the way described by Yuri was protestantism: various sects, cults. Whether one agrees with protestantism or not, (I don't) THIS is true. In the ranks of the Catholic Church there was also a subversion after the Second Vatican Council. I quote Pope Paul VI in a 1972 homily: "...from some crack the smoke of satan has entered the temple of God."
Something frightening? Check out the book "Goodbye Good Men." God bless!
Extraordinário material. Ajuda-nos a enfrentar a estúpida cultura marxista que domina todo o ambiente cultural/artístico/acadêmico e político neste Brasil. Não há como agradecer-lhe tamanha caridade, ao postar para nós este video. Obrigado
percent of actual physical ops. i feel honored to have suffered under the kgb the same way
1337Frederick 1 month ago
thing the kgb do to make people hate the government and religion. how wierd that Hitler was of the 15
1337Frederick 1 month ago
make the cia look guilty for torture during the pre trib
1337Frederick 1 month ago
interesting stuff. however the kgb picked up on the have faith thing he says at the end and now use it to
1337Frederick 1 month ago
In Israel we have a powerful religious basis and national identity. It certainly creates more challenge to subvert Israel on some ground. The bad winds are mostly from extreme left wing organization that receive funds from EU or Europeans countries such as Norway for so called Peace promotion. It is difficult to subvert Israeli to commit state treason versus Arab countries were the myth of all powerful Israeli intelligence wreck horror and mutual mistrust.
Mishkafofer 4 months ago
what a man!
molimhvalaizvoli 8 months ago
Fucking hell , that's what is exactly is happening in Brazil...yes right now.
gutenberg80 9 months ago
É. O video é de decadas atras, mas o que ele disse esta parecendo os dias atuais do Brasil. A minoria homo-ditadores ganhando espaço e poder no governo e atacando a todo o custo a religião judaico-cristão.
EntreterimentoFilmes 9 months ago
another genius lost by this world.... way ahead of his time..
MrPilotans 10 months ago
Notice that he is saying that religion and faith are the way to combat ideological subversion. Wisely, he does not specify WHAT religion or WHICH religion (if any that currently even exist).
New religions can be made. Better religions - that are not intrinsically oppressive or violent but of which are open to new information, that are adaptive by design and which draw from the best of the current religions AND from science to help all humanity better ourselves by beneficent ways and means.
SororThothma 11 months ago
Comment removed
suchafool990 11 months ago
jiu jitsu you dumbfuck
eugdog106 1 year ago
You stop demoralization with religion? Not necessarily. As Yuri said himself, religions too(and clergies in particular) are not immune to subversion and demoralization. But you can stop demoralization wit MORAL values. Religions CAN help with moral values - but better than just religion is faith and moral values and you don't need religions for that. Communists are not afraid of religions, but they are scared of faith and traditional moral values and so they do their utmost to smear them.
Supenmanu 1 year ago
not religion, but common conciosness is the key, because religions are deviding people for centuries. nevertheless, im surprised by the width and profundity of this guy's knowledge!
jugeen7 1 year ago
@jugeen7 That's because you don't know Christ.
Modelmaterial7 1 year ago
India is the most sexually corrupt society on earth. Kama Sutra anyone? The USA got corrupted when the hippies went to India in the '60s looking for enlightment but instead came back with Free Love, man.
indiasucksalways 1 year ago
@indiasucksalways Kama Sutra was intended for married couples, and didn't deal only with sex, but with social norms of behavior. Today the West is 100 times more degenerate in sexual behavior than the most exotic societies of the East. Even though Bollywood is a giant movie industry, can you find the Indian porn? Can you find sex scenes in mainstream Bollywood movies?
hermitcleric 1 year ago 9
@hermitcleric Yes. And Yes. The internet is full of Indian porn. Just google it. Even between married couples, some of the shit Kama Sutra advocates is nasty.
indiasucksalways 1 year ago
@indiasucksalways AMATEUR porn, genius. What portion of Bollywood deals with porn? Which Bollywood movie depicts sex acts?
hermitcleric 1 year ago 2
@hermitcleric Come on, it's all over India. You can't pick up an Indian periodical without seeing articles about sex all over the place. Give me a break. All they think about is sex. India has a higher AIDS rate than Africa for crying out loud.
indiasucksalways 1 year ago
@indiasucksalways
Indias culture and way of life is being systemically dismantled just like ours. Its the NWO restructuring the world. They cannot build a new world without first destroying the old...
bbqbeefrib 1 year ago
@hermitcleric Oh and read Times of India website. Every other article is about sex or "babes".
indiasucksalways 1 year ago
@hermitcleric seems like people like to ask stupid question on try to find were he is wrong....when even if 5% of his talk is true we are fucket up badly.The story fits 100% last 20 years of Bulgaria......100fuckign % and the hero (old social dictator
mastakur 10 months ago
hm the last 2 min basicly rounds up what i have learn making my masters degst
religion is esential.
me with religion.most important:
1.Moral.2Family.3Friends.
me atheist.
1.Family.2Friends(both of those are self interests)
mastakur 10 months ago
@mastakur Spengler: The Decadence of the West
hermitcleric 10 months ago
If this was a movie, it would be great with a lousy ending. Yes, it's nice to know religion used to be a great instrument, but the reality is that the instrument was only valid in times when we needed something to explain things we did not understand yet. If you think the earth is flat and don't know where the lightning in the sky is coming from, religion works much better. Inevitably, its role will deteriorate. So it is no answer to anything. An answer would be a moral replacement for religion.
frambosidica 1 year ago
@frambosidica Refer to the long thread with Scurck.
hermitcleric 1 year ago
Comment removed
suchafool990 11 months ago
Fascinating talk this. What I like is that back in 1983 he uses nothing more than chalk and a blackboard to illustrate his talk whereas now most lecturers use a digital slide projector. Yet this guy gets his point across very well. I am impressed he can hopld an audience.
airscrew1 1 year ago
@airscrew1 I don't see how one could not be interested in such things
DREwestcoast 1 year ago 2
Very beautiful the conclusion of the lecture, thank you for uploading and sharing this material. Children at school should all listen to this.
H3aRtFuLLofBLaCk 1 year ago
Amazing!!! Having studied phycology and sociology, this lecture connects a lot of dots. I'll highly recommend people to watch this!
TheLocalOutdoorsman 2 years ago 11
amazing lecture...
lushhmushh 2 years ago
I am a large skeptic of things, and I have to say I'm slightly convinced of this guys lecture; it just seems to make sense. There's no proof of things like this you can get, and it's obviously not paranoid conspiracy theory, he's predicted the exact thing that's been happening, but back in 1983. There's credibility in that. My only thought is not to bring back religion, but to make an ethics code for atheists that they can subscribe to, one with logical arguments. I think this would unify us.
slaughtz 2 years ago
Evidences supporting this can be heard in the part from this lecture I labeled "part IIa". Bring "back" religion is itself a flaw. What people call "atheism" today is a religion better described as evolutionary materialism. One cannot derive an ethics code from a materialist worldview or cosmology because matter does not have ethics, nor does the Darwinist selection. In fact, social Darwinism (a.k.a. III Reich eugenics) were derived by Darwin himself from the apparent logic of selection.
hermitcleric 2 years ago
Refer to "The Descent of Man..." by Darwin. If there's no transcendental judgement of one's actions, then will is "all of the law". Nietzsche got the atheist ethics with relative precision, precisely because he was enough of a nutcase to advocate it. Any ethics curbing one's will must be logically separate from the materialist cosmology, which means that materialists and modern Darwinists will have to seek the principles for ethics outside matter, denying their cosmology.
hermitcleric 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The BNP is for bringing in non-Whites to rape your White women and destroy your cities, just like every other party! If Brits don't stop supporting nonsense like the BNP your country will be a Muslim and non-White shithole with Whites dead or enslaved. Forget the BNP, support the Insurgent and save the White race!
Go to:
resist dot com
Lone113 2 years ago
Religion is very important in a way that it hold back the ignorant and often "stupid" masses from being channeled in some destrucitve ideologies threatening the current order of a society.
The point there is it being immaterial thus highly difficult to attack in opposition with material ideology as communism.
Of course it doesn't mean a religion is better for the good of all than any other moronic ideology.
vivEnergy 2 years ago
In some aspects, the masses need to be held back by fears and authorities, like the fear from Hell, because one cannot expect to bring the masses up to the level of rational arguments.
On the other hand, who said contemporary evolutionary materialism is rational, and not another moronic ideology? Also, if the intellectual elite decays morally due to materialism, so will the people, which is exactly what is happening.
hermitcleric 2 years ago
Anyway, Lenin said that even the most "reactionary, bourgeoisie materialism" is useful to the Marxist strategy, as long as it "is essential for our struggle against the predominating religious obscurantists". Therefore, ANY atheist militant is a useful idiot to Marxist-Leninist strategy, and comrade Lenin knows the final fate of useful idiots. The clock is ticking.
See "On the Significance of Militant Materialism" by Lenin.
hermitcleric 2 years ago
Rest in peace, Jurij.
witkocaster 2 years ago
Sure, religion is capable of holding society together. So is military dictatorship and several FUCKED UP things as well. If these are the only ways of holding society together we are able to come up with, then society is NOT WORTH holding together at all. We might just as well revert back to animals with pea-sized brains and an average lifespan of a couple months. Fuck it all
mrkvamaster 2 years ago
Revert specifically back to apes, along with the other atheists that complained in this final part of the lecture. And no, dictatorship by itself is not able to hold society together, or else Rome or Egypt wouldn't have fallen. Religionless dictatorship is just the final stage before collapse, anarchy and replacement by a new worldview.
hermitcleric 2 years ago
@hermitcleric which is the intention of our beloved leaders but the atheists won't accept this
themasterofbots 1 year ago
I was raised by White Russian emigres who were anti-Soviet. Most of them have fled Bolshevism in 1919 and a few years later. They were members of an anti-Soviet organization called Norodnoi Trudovoi Soyuz (NTS) which published Posev, and Grani. My uncle, Dr. Poremsky help initiate Radio Liberte and Radio Free Russia in Frankfurt Maine, Germany. My parents had Soviet exchange students come over and we haded them anti-Soviet literature to take back. I recorded subversive music for them.
Nguli34689 2 years ago
It says on wiki that he died in Canada in 1997. I agree, wonderful lecture and a very brave man
woodpit420 2 years ago 12
What a wonderful speech. I am so glad I found this and watched it. Where is Yuri now?
CaptinChaos 2 years ago 2
This man speaks the truth. Im glad I found his discourse on this subject. I surely hope all are able to discern it for themselves. For your sake at least.
xphiber 2 years ago 2
maravilhoso!
rrrbelo 2 years ago
You can sit up here and watch this man clearly showcasing the undisclosed criminal corruption of the world, and still believe anything that the system concocts. Is it just coincidental that the world elite have been pledging allegiance to the same God for centuries? All dedicating their life work to sacrificially honoring the one who has granted and promised them power? No one ever seems to turn their focus to the Luciferians, they just choose to attack the one that internally attacks them. =D
Modelmaterial7 2 years ago
You honestly sound more inclined to commit violence just in your general resistance to accept something as pure as God. I just have one question for you. With the world as thoroughly flawed as it is; how flawed would it be, if people just simply followed the rules that the Bible details? Would there be issues if everyone followed the Bible? No there wouldn't be. The only thing flawed, is man! The moment you inject an outside theory to substitute Gods word then that's where all things corrupt.
Modelmaterial7 2 years ago
Amazing lecture.
nphec 2 years ago
god bless kgb defectors.
They are the only ones who understand what's going on.)
yaroshustos 2 years ago 5
Hell of a series. It even changed my mind a bit on the role of religion in society, and I'm a Christian and a libertarian. Interesting stuff to think about.
knab69 2 years ago 6
4:59
TheToltec 2 years ago
thats it
magnifysumthn 2 years ago
I know
TheToltec 2 years ago
Outstanding:)
TheToltec 2 years ago
great staff thank you
pelasgos 3 years ago 2
Are there any places online that sell a DVD of this lecture?
OhioGuy19 3 years ago 3
KGB = Mossad.
buitenzorg3 3 years ago
Coca Cola = NASA
hermitcleric 3 years ago
Pepsi = Obama
Coke = Hilary. I kid you not. Check it out.
5 stars, me amigo. Muchas gracias for posting videos by my hero, Yuri Bezmenov!
opchidexio 3 years ago
Grande trabalho cara!
Vídeo extremamente esclarecedor!
pedromlf38 3 years ago 5
One major item that he miss though is the intentional dumbing down of the majority population by forcing all to think on the same level as the population group with the lowest IQ. This group and its behavior is marketed as cool and desirable, even though it displays primitive behavior and even criminal acts as the core values.
I'm of course talking about blacks in USA.
And in Sweden's case, somalis and arabs.
Scurck 3 years ago 2
I wouldn't say blacks, because black is just a skin color, which is accidental. One can be black and well educated. I would say hip hop, "nigga" or ghetto subculture, or even gang subculture in some cases. It is truly disgusting the way MTV glamourizes things as low as pimps and "hoes", but this is included in the moral relativity part, and don't forget this is a 1983 lecture. Back then, ghetto subculture was not as promoted as today.
hermitcleric 3 years ago
Skin color occidental? Skin color, length, feet size and IQ are all absolute and a direct result of the genes passed down from the parents. Skin color is an indicator of a persons racial traits.
In Sweden the population was basically homogeneous up until the late 80's. So even though they fucked up schooling and police in the 60's the IQ did not drop and crime did not increase. So they imported massive numbers of primitives to enable Sweden to enter the destabilization phase.
Scurck 3 years ago
Consider an intellectual: his skin color is accidental, because it has nothing to do with intellectual faculties.
IQ is neither absolute nor a direct result of genes. IQ is not even considered a valid biological phenotype. Stop bluffing.
hermitcleric 3 years ago
Wrong. 75% of a persons IQ are based on genes. The remaining 25% include natural deviation and environmental influences. And just as skin color it is hereditary. If skin color where just random there would be people of all colors everywhere.
Scurck 3 years ago 3
yep, thats another, and to many very bothersome, truth; there has been 30 years of IQ testing with all kinds of controls for environment and so forth and the results are almost totally constant to a percent or even tenth of a percent.
FarFromEquilibrium 3 years ago 2
In Sweden IQ is very high today even for Western standards. So what? IQ and schooling do not prevent a society from collapsing. What keeps a society together is common sense, common laws from common beliefs, however primitive. Wake up! You are being taken over by Islam, and their IQ is quite lower than Europe's, but they have a cosmic view, common laws and common sense, and you don't, and unless you have it, you'll lose. Lose with a high IQ, but that's just Game Over with high IQ.
hermitcleric 3 years ago
I have woken up, that's what I said in my first comments. All of western society is being destroyed by political correctness and mass immigration of primitives according to the marxist plan.
And I am working quite hard here on YT and other places to get people to realize this and vote for the parties that will break this development. Parties that stand for reality, unity and freedom.
And this movement is obviously not part of the subversion as it is hated in all media.
Scurck 3 years ago 5
So you're voting Independent, then? Because any other party just encourages "group think" to some degree. It's sad but true. I thought about being Libertarian for a while, maybe even joining the Constitutional party, but for now I haven't found any existing political party that didn't have some rather nasty ideas hiding in the wings.
XfileverloyalDrWho 2 years ago
There is no "Independent" to vote for in Sweden... The biggest party to the right of the middle (economically) got 200 votes in the last elections.
I vote for the party that base most of their politics on reality as opposed to basing them on fantasies as most other parties do. <- A choice that just shows how sick Swedish politics are.
Scurck 2 years ago
blacks have been used as tools for communists. it isn't because there is something "inherently" wrong with them as a people. The negative aspects of their culture has been cultivated and agitate to keep our society (black AND white existing together) from being cohesive.
antlerbaby 2 years ago
There is nothing wrong with blacks or arabs, it's just that their natural IQ level is much lower and thus have less control over the primitive urges. Meaning they are more likely to commit crimes.
No unified society with mixed races have been stable during the entire history of mankind. Ethic conflict and chaos have ALWAYS become the end result. The marxists know this and use them for this purpose, but no agitation is needed, they create the conflict automatically by being themselves.
Scurck 2 years ago
But IQ has nothing to do with morality. Often times people with retardation are happy and friendly. There are dumb criminals but the ones that do the most damage have very high IQ's.
Humble God-serving people do not control or exploit others. I'd rather be among Christians then some Godless scientists working to make their world more 'efficient'. Many important scientists and doctors have been Jews and Christians. Commies don't want you to think about that, though.
antlerbaby 2 years ago
Retardation is not part of the natural IQ span. It is often caused by developmental errors or other brain damage. One can make an interesting note that while IQ 70 is the retardation level for whites, it is well within the natural IQ span of blacks in USA (85) and higher then the IQ of blacks in Africa (67).
Morality is a social construct
The FACT is that religious people are FAR more inclined to commit crime and engage in what society considers 'immoral' acts then atheists.
Scurck 2 years ago
Most criminals are atheists.
antlerbaby 2 years ago
No, most criminals are religious.
A religious person can afford to waste his life in prison because he believe that his soul has eternal life. An atheist knows that this is the only life he got and the only time his self will exist
Sweden as the most secularized free country had close to zero crime.
Scurck 2 years ago
If this life is the only life you are going to live now I can understand why you are so frustrated with all the dummies messing it up.
antlerbaby 2 years ago
Actually, your crime is going up in Sweden because of Muslim immigrants in that country. So, crime is going up. Secularism of the soul would lead to unhappiness and filling that void with religion is why man created religion, so that we have some reassurance that we going to go somewhere pleasant when we die or some comfort knowing our souls will be reborn.
Patchman123 2 years ago
I was more comfortable when I was an atheist, because I didn't face the idea of Hell. This "religious comfort" story is absolute baloney, except for new age fake religions that deny the idea of Hell and assure universal salvation.
hermitcleric 2 years ago
Hey, your ancestors had fill a void somehow. Your ancestors worshiped spirits because they wanted some comfort when they died or agony if they screwed up. That's how ancient peoples thought. There were no atheists in a ancient times, at least that I'm aware of. He's saying that lack of religion leads to decline and lack of morals. Morals are derived from religion. You swear an oath on the Bible every time you're in court. You swear to tell the truth to a divine power swearing the highest oath.
Patchman123 2 years ago
This is how the atheist mythology works: first, man evolved from a primate or monkey, which does not have the idea of God, THEN the charlatans invented religion, and all our ancestors were dumb enough to buy it. And now we don't need it anymore, because NOW we have skepticism and the scientific method. All these assumptions and their variations are either historically false, unproven or absurd, so atheists just cling to them by faith because it's required by their worldview.
hermitcleric 2 years ago
People will still always worship religion. People in caves wrote on walls and worshiped gods. Science can't explain everything like when people mysteriously heal after being horrifically injured for example. They don't know what happened so they use religious terms like a miracle to describe it for example. The Vatican embraces science and has an observatory outside Rome. Something unheard of in Galileo's day. Our ancestors didn't think they were stupid . That's all they knew.
Patchman123 2 years ago
i have my faith in atheism still..so just faith ,faith in yours believes .i agreed with yuri views 100%
newspolitics2k09 2 years ago
Read up on your psychology. IQ is not an accurate measure of intelligence cross-culturally, and certainly not racially (for starters, we're GENETICALLY the SAME RACE. Seriously, man, do your homework)...
An example of this would be the differentials in other forms of mental aptitude which pertains to muscle control, agility, response time, etc. As well as the fact that a pattern-based test only works if the test-taker is exposed to same or similar patterns as the test-giver.
XfileverloyalDrWho 2 years ago
"Race" is no longer a word that can describe anything specific as everyone have their own definition of that it means.
That we are genetically similar is irrelevant as we have nothing else to compare with. The traits that govern other things then intelligence can still be quite different between "population groups", so why would intelligence be a special case in which all humans have the same capabilities?
Scurck 2 years ago
Because material proof shows us that there were great black, asian and muslim intellectuals in the history of mankind, Mr. Gimme-the-Proof.
hermitcleric 2 years ago
IQ is a human construct. So is science.
antlerbaby 2 years ago
IQ is a measurement of an individuals capability to see patterns and solve problems (intelligence) in relation to the rest of the population.
Science is a system of acquiring knowledge based on the scientific method. The scientific method consists of the collection of data through observation and experimentation, and the formulation and testing of hypotheses.
Morality is a social construct and can thus change when society change.
Scurck 2 years ago
Ok then, let's outlaw religion and enslave all the idiot people for the scientific good of those with superiour IQ's.
Heaven on earth, or rather, uh...... earth on earth!!!
antlerbaby 2 years ago
Yes, outlaw all organized religion as fraud. But since it is a human right to think and express whatever you want people can still be as religious as they wish. The difference will be that there would be no authoritarian organizations telling people what to think.
Scurck 2 years ago
The organization that would outlaw religion would necessarily not only be telling us that organized religion is fraud, but it would do it in such a way to criminalize anyone that thinks different. And also, in order to do it, this organization would have to be stronger than any organized religion. So we are talking about a strong authoritarian regime imposing an anti-clergy worldview as LAW. Am I supposed to keep taking this (supposedly) libertarian nonsense seriously?
hermitcleric 2 years ago
Have you had any recent encounters with the public school system recently? Because last time I checked they were pretty dead-set on eliminating religious practice from schools and secularizing the younger generations' common worldview.
XfileverloyalDrWho 2 years ago
Of course, this is the New World Order agenda, planned decades (centuries?) ago and currently executed by aligned governments. Every single Western government today is aligned to the NWO to a certain degree. And some people think this has something to do with "freedom". I believe the NWO is purely destructive, just as the ideals of the French Revolution, meaning that it's not sustainable as a cultural cycle. Another culture, another religion will necessarily take over.
hermitcleric 2 years ago
Bearing in mind, of course, that a "religion" does not always go by cover of that name... in a faithless vacuum you're more likely to find a cult of personality springing up than a traditional spiritually involved religion.
But organized or no, I do agree that the world seems to be moving in an increasingly uniform direction. Either it'll reach a breaking point and fracture or we'll all fall together. Buckle your seatbelts, folks!
XfileverloyalDrWho 2 years ago
You mean the rule of the caesars? This is the stage that comes after mobocracy, and it's the final stage before the fall and the coming of a new cultural cycle. The caesars are decadent and they themselves demoralize the people even more, because everybody knows that they are not gods, but even still they must bow before them, resulting in widespread cynicism, which was the case of the Soviet people.
hermitcleric 2 years ago
Yes, half sheep and half cynics is a nasty mix, isn't it?
XfileverloyalDrWho 2 years ago
Not at all. What is needed is to have a democratically elected government make a law that label organized religion as any other fraud. Meaning: "The practice of telling other people that an unknown is the absolute truth and basing an organization around this unprovable claim."
The weakest police force is by definition stronger then any organized religion.
Clergy that keeps practicing their fraud will of course be treated as the criminals they are.
Humanity will finally be free!
Scurck 2 years ago
And since the existence of God is proven in metaphysics, and the materialist claim is impossible and requires blind faith (I'm not going to demonstrate it here via YouTube comments), your so-called democracy would be a democratically elected tyranny (like many were) imposing its own worldview, your false claim of unprovability, millenia-long rebutted phylosophycal errors like materialism, empiricism and skepticism, and criminalizing the dissidents as enemies (or "opiate") of the people.
hermitcleric 2 years ago
"And since the existence of God is proven in metaphysics"
The only reply needed to this is a simple: LOL
No argument is needed.
Scurck 2 years ago
I expected nothing more.
hermitcleric 2 years ago
Scurck - what you are describing eerily resembles the policies of the French Revolution, which, if you've read up on your history, was one of the most senseless periods of bloodshed and tyranny in European history.
Additionally: organized religion, not necessarily having governmental authority, is not in itself criminal. The crime, as you say, would indeed pertain to all "practices of telling other people than an unknown is the absolute truth and basing an organization around this".
XfileverloyalDrWho 2 years ago
And yet, you suggest such an action -- by criminalizing a belief system one organization, (humanist, secular, based in Reason though it may be) simply lays claim to an "absolute truth". In this case, that "absolute truth" would be the arrogant idea that said organization Knows Better than anyone belonging to a religion. Therefore, they are denying others the right to think for themselves and basing their organization around an unprovable claim.
XfileverloyalDrWho 2 years ago
Wrong.
The non-existence of things do not need proof. The claim of the existence of something need to be able to prove its claim. If it can not be proven and the claimers still insist it exist and make others believe it as well, then it is a fraud, a scam - a crime.
An atheist does not claim the truth of anything.
The non-existence of god/santa claus/big foot is the truth until you can prove otherwise.
Scurck 2 years ago
The argument of non-proof-of-inexistence is the weakest of all and I never use it, because it applies to the pink unicorn, flying spaghetti monster, Santa and all this stuff.
"An atheist does not claim the truth of anything."
Ye olde skeptical argument. So, IS IT TRUE that an atheist doesn't claim the truth of anything?
hermitcleric 2 years ago
How nice, and how does the French revolution (against tyranny and corruption) compare to the inquisition and witch burnings that religion has brought us?
Sure, it would include all sects and other organizations making money from scamming people, like astrology and fortune telling.
Scurck 2 years ago
Did you miss the part where revolutionaries started killing people without discretion simply because they were associated with a certain "outgroup" (les aristos, calotins, etc)? They slaughtered massive numbers of non-threatening women, children, nuns and clergy - simply for the crime of their birth and for holding to their beliefs. This was done in the name of Reason. Such atrocities are not the fault of religion, but of human cruelty and imagination.
XfileverloyalDrWho 2 years ago
The French revolution has killed in one year more people than the Inquisition killed in 4 centuries. As for witch-hunts, you should know that the Church was against witch burning because a Christian cannot believe in actual witchery, while the old pagan religions not only believed in it, but were all for persecution of so-called witches. So, the Church was trying to STOP the European people from burning "witches". The protestants brought this scourge back and now people blame it on "the Church".
hermitcleric 2 years ago
Not really following the "cannot believe in actual witchery" bit... because, um, it does exist. Just because it's the work of the enemy doesn't make it non-existant. HOWEVER, the intense persecution of those who invoke spirits for various and sundry purposes is unethical.
XfileverloyalDrWho 2 years ago
It is not for anyone to pass judgment on this earth. That's up to God (for those who don't believe in God, call it what you will) but in any case, the "fault" of such behavior is in the people instituting persecution and false judgment. It's not a direct result of an entire religious movement.
XfileverloyalDrWho 2 years ago
Organized atheism IS a scam. Why should one think that the materialism, empiricism and evolutionism that base modern atheism are respectable and non-contradictory ideas? They aren't. They are just blind and wish-it-were beliefs in properties of matter that matter itself does not have, and skepticism crowns all this as a shield from unwanted questions, deemed as "irrelevant" from its pedestal of superiority.
hermitcleric 2 years ago
@Scurck last time i checked it claimed more victims than the inquisition
themasterofbots 1 year ago
@themasterofbots Even it that was true it is still totally irrelevant.
Here is a hard question for you: One of these are good and one is bad, can you label them correctly?
-Revolution against tyranny and oppression.
-Brutal suppression of a rebellion against tyranny.
If you think real long and hard I bet you can come up with the correct answer.
But watch out, I know what the bible say about this!
Scurck 1 year ago
@Scurck against a tyranny its acceptable,against a dictatorship/monarchy its not that acceptable.BUT ONE IS TO REBEL AND ANOTHER IS TO KILL LIKE A MAD ANIMAL LIKE THE FRENCH DID
themasterofbots 1 year ago
@themasterofbots Romans 13:1 "Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God. 2 Therefore whoever resists the authorities resists what God has appointed, and those who resist will incur judgment."
---
The French there oppressed by retarded kings and religion. They rose up against their oppressors and killed those who had done them wrong.
As they say, payback's a bitch.
Scurck 1 year ago
@Scurck men chose leaders but to their deserving.If people are too dumb to find good ones(or replace them by execution when necesarry) then yes,we deserve what we get.And yes that verset is sort of dumb.But remember that theres a diffrence between a leader and a tyrant.A leader loves his country and his interest is to preserve it and his people while a tyrant.......
themasterofbots 1 year ago
@themasterofbots According to the bible even a tyrant is put there by god.
-Probably to punish some imaginary sin the people have committed.
You believe in the bible don't you?
Scurck 1 year ago
@Scurck yes.And most of the time people deserve what they get :)
themasterofbots 1 year ago
@themasterofbots
So you kill people who work on the sabbath and believe that gravity is a false scientific theory since the bible say it is angels who are holding everything down?
Scurck 1 year ago
@Scurck ha ha.Work on sabbath is old law that being one.2 Where did you get the gravity thing?
themasterofbots 1 year ago
@Scurck now a hard one for you.On what do atheist base their ethics ?
themasterofbots 1 year ago
@themasterofbots That does not compute.
I will reply with a comparable question to clarify this for you:
On what do non-buss drivers base their teeth brushing techniques?
Scurck 1 year ago
@Scurck on nothing exactly like the thing on which atheist base their ethics :).So they are not trustful as they have no reason to uphold their word or act morally
themasterofbots 1 year ago
@themasterofbots You make no sense whatsoever.
You can not ask a question about what relation a non-something have with a totally unrelated subject and expect a proper answer.
I am an Objectivist, thus I base my actions on reason and my relation to the world around me. You know, the thing we call REALITY. This is of course a far better and superior base of ethics then an old book that commands you to kill people who work on the sabbath...
Scurck 1 year ago
@themasterofbots
"now a hard one for you.On what do atheist base their ethics ?"
not a hard one in my opinion.
Same as religious believers....On their own(personal belief) or from others(others who transcripted the so-called book of life; the bible, preachers who interpret the bible).
Isn't the bible some kind of propaganda itself, maybe call it propaganda of GOD
What is to say that everything we think is gods moral, isn't it possible it's a moral-belief that come from within ourselves?
kukhufvud 1 year ago
@kukhufvud ever wondered why there's an incresing number of sociopaths ?It's quite an epidemic out there.Also,many people would do nasty things if religion didn't keep them in check.In religion your brother is your equal,in atheism,you are God
themasterofbots 1 year ago
Great and correct description of our current reality (we are just before the crisis phase). Noting that he said this 26 years ago gives this theory extreme weight, but I absolutely do not agree with the shit about religion. Enlightened people with a free mind do not need superstitions in their lives.
Before I saw this I had already detected all the things he describe in the society around me and I also had them connected in some way but have not really been able to see the source of it all.
Scurck 3 years ago
So get rid of religion and see what happens, Brainiac. Shafarevich stated a hard fact about cultural cycles, and the strengthening of atheism, positivism, materialism, skepticism and other philosophical crap is the sign of the end of a dying cultural cycle, to be replaced by another positive theology and cosmology, not by some nice enlightenment which atomizes the society into mobocracy or ochlocracy, which is analogous to the destabilization stage.
hermitcleric 3 years ago
When was the last time atheism was widespread and in what free historical society have atheists been in majority?
If you can find any, did they know the truths about reality as we do now, did they have a world wide communication network?
No, I would say that no society has ever been in the situation we are in now. So most historical precedents are void.
Scurck 3 years ago
Do you think the idea that the universe is all that exists is new or only widespread now? This is wishful thinking, just in order to hide the fact that atheism and materialism atomize societies since the dawn of men, through decadent Greece, decadent Rome. You THINK we know a lot about reality because one writes a mathematical formula to decribe a phenomenon, and ergo reality works that way. Atheists and free society are incompatible, like in Republican Spain. Read Shafarevich's book.
hermitcleric 3 years ago
As already stated, no historical society had the internet and at no time in history have the free thinking societies had such a vast superiority in power over the non-thinking peoples.
Science does not dictate reality. Science are really, really good guesses about how reality works, and all science can be replaced by better theories.
I am an Objectivist, so I would rather see society ruled by the best suited. And I reject all altruistic ideologies.
Scurck 3 years ago
Scurck- "Before I saw this I had already detected all the things he describe in the society around me and I also had them connected in some way but have not really been able to see the source of it all."
And you still chose to be a bonehead anyway. Accept Christ.
Modelmaterial7 2 years ago
I prefer to face reality instead of basing my life on silly superstitions.
Never in the entire history of mankind had there been any kind of proof for any god, ghost, soul, demon, spirit, troll, gnome or anything supernatural.
Jesus was a fictional character and the roots of most stories in the bible can be traced to far older religions and belief systems.
Organized religions should be illegal and labeled for what it is >>> fraud.
Scurck 2 years ago
I'm terribly sorry for you and I'll pray for you. If it's proof you're waiting for, then all you have to do is die to find it. It's always the spiritually blind that tread through life searching for the fossil of Christ. The evidence for God is all around us, the miracle of his creation is in every living thing and every intelligent living structure. You truly have to be seeking the Lord in order to find him. Not for reasons not to believe. Have a gday!
Modelmaterial7 2 years ago
Fine, waste your time on that instead of corrupting the minds of people around you.
What is all around us and in every living thing is the clear and undeniable evidence for a natural universe without any spiritual influence.
"You truly have to be seeking almighty Odin in order to find him. You surely must be spiritually blind to not see his hand in all existence from when he created the world from the parts of the giant Ymir..." <- your arguments are just as silly.
Scurck 2 years ago
God is reality, therefore you face God. The God you are opposed to is a straw-man figure that lacks all the eight characteristics of God described by St. Thomas Aquinas. Anyway, have you ever studied seriously the history of miracles, like the one in Fatima? All the skeptical explanations for this miracle are plain pathetic. Last year the body of St. Pius of Pietrelcina was exhumed after 40 years and it was absolutely incorrupt, caught on tape and film.
hermitcleric 2 years ago
There are no history of miracles as no true miracle has ever happened.
Fatima... some kids talking crap = a miracle? LOL!!!
In 1719 a man was found perfectly preserved in a Swedish mine. He had been missing for 40 years. The naturalist Carolus Linnaeus found out that it was a natural process from the conditions in the mine...
Scurck 2 years ago
You just showed that you don't even know about the miracle of the Sun, so I assume your answer to my question is no, as I expected. I know atheists by heart: I used to be one. By that time I didn't study miracles simply because I didn't care, I thought it was all fake, just like you.
And these same conditions coincidentally happened to St. Pius and many other saints that are buried in the most diverse conditions. How frequently are we expecting to see coincidences, anyway?
hermitcleric 2 years ago
What is miraculous about the sun? Is is a big ball of plasma who burns with thermonuclear fusion. Just like any other star in the entire universe.
You do know that there exist quite big rewards for people who can prove that ANYTHING supernatural exist? So how come that no one has ever been able to claim the rewards?
Willful ignorance is the worst crime a sentient being can commit towards itself. If you are a christian you should follow the eight commandment and stop lying to yourself.
Scurck 2 years ago
I am post-graduate in astrophysics. Thanks for the class, Brainiac. You are just making a public statement of ignorance by not even acknowledging what was claimed and witnessed by tens of thousands of people in Fatima. I'm not going to supply you with knowledge you should have before trying to discuss Fatima with me. YOU are a willful ignorant.
Prove something supernatural exists by using natural means, like measuring equipment? The PREMISE is absurd. The supernatural is LOGICALLY proved.
hermitcleric 2 years ago
Oh yeah, and I am an astronaut writing this on the surface of Mars...
So, what is miraculous about the sun?
Mass hysteria is not uncommon when religion is involved. And Christianity has no monopoly of such claims of miracles either. Either ALL miracles of ALL religions are true (which makes the christian claim even more silly), or none of the miracles are true...
PROVING something by logic alone? LOL! Your claim only shows that you have no concept of the scientific method.
Scurck 2 years ago
There's nothing miraculous about the Sun itself. I never claimed that in any way.
The theories of mass hysteria and mass hallucination in Fatima were ruled out by psychology experts. Like I said, you are totally unaware of the problem.
The principle of identity and the existence of absolute truth are proven logically in an irrefutable way (apodictic). The scientific method, when used, relies on logic and metaphysical premises, but it can also be an idol to people such as yourself.
hermitcleric 2 years ago
Scurck: "Organized religions should be illegal and labeled for what it is >>> fraud."
Sweet! Just the agenda of the New World Order/ United Nations!
hermitcleric 2 years ago
The UN can suck my atheist finger, the middle one.
Scurck 2 years ago
What the useful idiot never understands is that he doesn't have to be FOR the enemy. As long as he toes the agenda, he's doing his job.
hermitcleric 2 years ago
Marxism and religion is the enemy of all free thinking humans who loves our own life and wish to live it according to our own choice.
Both marxism and religion contain at their core the demand for absolute sacrifice towards the collective = altruism.
Open your mind to freedom: view_play_list?p=D688153FDB922DE8
Scurck 2 years ago
Marxism and religion have something in common: they are both cosmic visions. The thing about marxism is that it is the gospel of materialism with a future of welfare on Earth, not in Heaven. One of its premises is the achievement of the End of History ON Earth, which is plain absurd. Aynrandist individualism, on the other had, is just an atomizing force. Not a single civilization on Earth was based on freedom. A "Thelemic" society is a joke under the civilizational aspect.
hermitcleric 2 years ago
What marxism and religion have in common is that both use the lie of altruism to commit rape on the human mind and impose authoritarian rule over the people. Both demand that the individual sacrifice his own life to them and claim this to be good.
Only a modern society with the freedoms we have now could evolve into a truly free society. And it would of course be atheist, not "thelemic"...
Scurck 2 years ago
Freedom cannot be the founding principle of anything coherent due to the accidental nature of will. A society is necessarily exclusive of certain acts, therefore there's no such thing as a free society. It's just a verbal fetish. Your complaint is not with marxism or religion, but with any sort of civilizational cosmic view. Correction: any, except yours. Let's not forget who's willing to make religion illegal IN THE NAME OF FREEDOM, but, like I said, freedom is just a verbal fetish to you.
hermitcleric 2 years ago
From 4:10 to 4:20 he gets so into it, very articulate.
gosciu555 3 years ago 2
I disagree slightly on the religious part. I think mainstream religion can be subverted as well. He knows that the mainstream churches in America became very open to liberalism, feminism, political correctness, open borders, etc. And this was over 20 years ago when he gave this lecture..some denominations today accept homosexuality.
Even if some born-again congregation is very conservative, they are usually very Zionist and pro-open borders.
JD1985 3 years ago
You are correct in many ways. Why, the first subversion to Christianity in the way described by Yuri was protestantism: various sects, cults. Whether one agrees with protestantism or not, (I don't) THIS is true. In the ranks of the Catholic Church there was also a subversion after the Second Vatican Council. I quote Pope Paul VI in a 1972 homily: "...from some crack the smoke of satan has entered the temple of God."
Something frightening? Check out the book "Goodbye Good Men." God bless!
hermitcleric 3 years ago
Comment removed
JD1985 3 years ago
This is the most important lecture I have heard in my life.
opchidexio 3 years ago 7
This has been flagged as spam show
If you liked that one, then check out this one
/watch?v=v4Pw-m3MbkA&feature=channel_page
gosciu555 3 years ago
Muito obrigado David por nos trazer este material. Ótimo trabalho.
darienfawkes 3 years ago
Excelente!
yurivs 3 years ago 3
Grande Yuri Vieira!
hermitcleric 3 years ago
Great Video. Many Thanks for posting.
8DoverNJ 3 years ago 2
Thank you. God bless you.
Extraordinário material. Ajuda-nos a enfrentar a estúpida cultura marxista que domina todo o ambiente cultural/artístico/acadêmico e político neste Brasil. Não há como agradecer-lhe tamanha caridade, ao postar para nós este video. Obrigado
canga123 3 years ago 3
Fantástico.
emanamoura 3 years ago 3
Obrigada, só tenho a agradecer por d