This message is for GoodScienceForYou. I have to leave it on my video because he has blocked me from commenting on his channel. I will leave his video response since I do not fear it. Censorship is not a form of argument.
I addressed this video a year ago. I also left you questions that you never answered. There are still questions on my video, the one you posted the video response.
It is a shame you did not win the Golden Croco-Duck.
I cannot stop laughing after reading your comment. Not from your flying fish question, that is an interesting question. However, I do not have an answer for you. I do not know much about fish evolution in the first place, let allow something as derived as a flying fish. Nevertheless, here is an article you can read about this subject: How and why do flying fish fly by John Davenport
Your self projection is more telling of your knowledge then anything about me. My entire thought process is not based on the theory of evolution in the first place; furthermore, it is not a belief. It is science with evidence, such as transitional fossils, ERV, atavism, etc., to support it.
Can you even define evolution in a scientific context?
Yes there are transitional fossils, simply because you closer your eyes and pretend they do not exist does not make them go away.
I am not trying to convert anyone; if you wish to remain ignorant, it does not bother me. Furthermore, I gave you an article to read about your first question and I am mocking you about your second one because it relives your ignorance of evolution. It is a straw man.
You are away what a genera is right? Most of our body is analogous to chimps and they are in a different genus. I do not see the point you are trying to make
The reason I am laughing is because of: "How about dolphins = fish that became mammals that became fish again?" This straw man only deserves to ridicule. If you truly believe that evolution teaches something this outrageous, then you do not know the first thing about the theory of evolution.
I am aware. I am also aware that wiki can be wrong and can also change its information day to day. So even though I think wiki is a good starting point, which is why I cite it, it is not a good reference to base all your information on, which is why I cite more then just wiki pages.
So again, can you cite a real scientific source that states that?
Take back your intelligence and start to see what is absolutely clear and obvious about this fantasy mythological religion that fills in the gaps with utter nonsense.
Well, you can help me with that by addressing the evidence that I have cited in this video. Please go over it and show me why it is wrong, with your own evidence. Stop spouting your opinions as if it was fact and give evidence for your ideas.
In addition, what gaps have been filled in with nonsense?
Congratulations on your Golden Cocoduck nomination.
OK. Even though I have gone over this with you already but you did not listen. I will download your video and put annotations and voice on it to explain it too you.
All you have to do is address the evidence that I present in this video. You have only sidestepped it and never gone over it. if you want to make a video you can, but I already told you I would only watch more of you videos if you defined evolution and natural selection. You have only defined one.
Please don't include "Evodelusionism" in the same category as science. Evodelusionism has not shown to be even slightly plausible. Yet million of fools believe in it. Get real. You do not know what real science is if you believe in a friggin religion of "Evodelusionism".
I am still waiting for you to demonstrate that you know the first thing about evolution by defining it. have you done the research, have you even looked at the source I have included in this video?
The original definition is; the theory that creatures have morphological and genetic changes enough to change into a new species with new features, over some huge amount of time.
It is not remotely related to the new "benign" sounding definition: "In fact, evolution can be precisely defined as any change in the frequency of alleles within a gene pool from one generation to the next."
Incorrect sir. The original definition is decent with modification. That is why by definition adaptation is evolution. So yes, it is related to the change in allelic frequency over time. Inference? How is it an inference if it is observable? By definition evolution has been observed.
It is amazing, it took you two months to do one thing I asked. Now I wonder how long it will take before you look at the sources for this video as well.
Your video is full of shit. You start out actually believing that arguing with creationists is some form of proof of evolution. Your religion does not stand up to any scrutiny on its own. You use creationism as a smoke screen.
I am not going to waste any more time on you. I thought you were actually wanting to learn something.
My video has evidence that you still have not addressed. Since I do not have a religion, I have no idea what you are talking about.
I have learned that you are willing to ignore all the evidence in order to keep your preconceived notion. That is something that religious people do. Yet you project that I am religious when I provide evidence to support what I accept.
Science is a tool that we use to understand the natural world. A god would be supernatural; therefore, science would be the wrong tool in understanding a god.
Because man exists in the PHYSICAL realm we are limited to what can be proven that is within this realm. God is SPIRITUAL and therefore exists OUTSIDE the realm of both TIME and PHYSICAL. One day when we die, just like Christ we will be resurrected and we will exist outside of the the realm of time and the physical. The caterpillar can not know what transformation is about to take place until it happens.
"Weakness of attitude becomes weakness of character." And "Great spirits have often encountered violent opposition from weak minds." and "The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education." Albert Einstein
If you believe in evolution, because you have been brainwashed by society, teachers, friends and parents, you will "see with evodelusion glasses" and all that you see will be "filtered" by that belief.
If you are a clear free thinker and do not take on any beliefs, "Evodelusionism" is just a religion. You never look at any premise with anything but evodelusion, so you keep getting more HEMG in your "glasses".
show me a transitional fossil in the fossil record. There is none ! there is evidence that species can have variations but only limited. I came from a ape or a fish?? Ha ha
Oh and i know what evolution is. A very highly sacred religion
If you want to see transitional fossil in the fossil record go to a natural history museum. There are thousands of known transitional fossil in the fossil record, just because you refuse to accept that does not make them go away. I named a few in this video that you can research on your own if you like, just remember to stay off the propaganda sites and go to real scientific journals if you are going to do that.
There is nothing religious about the theory of evolution, just like there is nothing religious about the theory of gravity or lift. Religions depend on faith, science depends on evidence, since there is over welling evidence for evolution it is a science.
I have already told you that evolution is the change in alleles in a population over time. Just because you have a flawed understanding of what evolution is does not make it wrong. Please do some research into the subject that you have such strong feelings against. In addition, did you see on the description the link to observed speciation events?
I just have to wonder if you ever took the time to look at any of the sources I used for this video. I mean you asked for observed speciation events and I have provided them. I am kind of hoping that your silence was because you find want you asked for.
LOL you are probably the dumbest person I have seen on the internet. If you wanna prove gods word to me we can go to a cave and I'll block it up with a boulder, see if youre alive in 7 days. THEN YOU HAVE A CONVERT :)!!#!P!I#!I@#)
If creationists make a hoax, science will expose it like the dinosaur/man footprints in Texas.
People can believe whatever they want to believe as long as they keep it out of the science classrooms. If they want to believe in gryphons and dragons, fine, I do not care. No one is forcing anyone to be smart. In addition, if they want that gryphons and dragons were real creatures they must show evidence that they were.
Certainly, but the followers will believe the hoax, even after it is publicly disproved. And the leaders would happily use gryphons as 'evidence for a mammal-bird cross', and even push it into the science classroom, if they could get away with it. Remember, they're not big on evidence when it comes to their own claims and beliefs.
I was mostly just talking about possibilities, exploring where the creationists might go next.
This message is for GoodScienceForYou. I have to leave it on my video because he has blocked me from commenting on his channel. I will leave his video response since I do not fear it. Censorship is not a form of argument.
I addressed this video a year ago. I also left you questions that you never answered. There are still questions on my video, the one you posted the video response.
It is a shame you did not win the Golden Croco-Duck.
jebus6kryst 1 year ago
How did flying fish 'evolve?'
How about dolphins = fish that became mammals that became fish again?
Seems highly improbable.
CrimeReport 2 years ago
I cannot stop laughing after reading your comment. Not from your flying fish question, that is an interesting question. However, I do not have an answer for you. I do not know much about fish evolution in the first place, let allow something as derived as a flying fish. Nevertheless, here is an article you can read about this subject: How and why do flying fish fly by John Davenport
jebus6kryst 2 years ago
So you are laughing at me, yet your entire thought process is based on belief.
You are a religious person the same way that the Chinese 'athiest' who worshipped Mao was religious.
That to me is somewhat humorous.
CrimeReport 2 years ago
Your self projection is more telling of your knowledge then anything about me. My entire thought process is not based on the theory of evolution in the first place; furthermore, it is not a belief. It is science with evidence, such as transitional fossils, ERV, atavism, etc., to support it.
Can you even define evolution in a scientific context?
jebus6kryst 2 years ago
There are no transitional fossils.
You are still dodging the original questions and you insulting me doesn't convert me to your cause.
Analogous body parts in different genera.
Lets stick with that for awhile before moving on.
CrimeReport 2 years ago
Yes there are transitional fossils, simply because you closer your eyes and pretend they do not exist does not make them go away.
I am not trying to convert anyone; if you wish to remain ignorant, it does not bother me. Furthermore, I gave you an article to read about your first question and I am mocking you about your second one because it relives your ignorance of evolution. It is a straw man.
jebus6kryst 2 years ago
You are away what a genera is right? Most of our body is analogous to chimps and they are in a different genus. I do not see the point you are trying to make
Still waiting for you to define evolution.
jebus6kryst 2 years ago
The reason I am laughing is because of: "How about dolphins = fish that became mammals that became fish again?" This straw man only deserves to ridicule. If you truly believe that evolution teaches something this outrageous, then you do not know the first thing about the theory of evolution.
jebus6kryst 2 years ago
Actually WIKI it my friend.
It DOES teach something this outrageous.....
CrimeReport 2 years ago
Well then, wiki is wrong. can you site a real scientific source that states that?
jebus6kryst 2 years ago
Since you enjoy irony so much, are you aware that you cite wikipedia in the info box of this video?
CrimeReport 2 years ago
I am aware. I am also aware that wiki can be wrong and can also change its information day to day. So even though I think wiki is a good starting point, which is why I cite it, it is not a good reference to base all your information on, which is why I cite more then just wiki pages.
So again, can you cite a real scientific source that states that?
jebus6kryst 2 years ago
Take back your intelligence and start to see what is absolutely clear and obvious about this fantasy mythological religion that fills in the gaps with utter nonsense.
GoodScienceForYou 2 years ago
Well, you can help me with that by addressing the evidence that I have cited in this video. Please go over it and show me why it is wrong, with your own evidence. Stop spouting your opinions as if it was fact and give evidence for your ideas.
In addition, what gaps have been filled in with nonsense?
Congratulations on your Golden Cocoduck nomination.
jebus6kryst 2 years ago
OK. Even though I have gone over this with you already but you did not listen. I will download your video and put annotations and voice on it to explain it too you.
GoodScienceForYou 2 years ago
All you have to do is address the evidence that I present in this video. You have only sidestepped it and never gone over it. if you want to make a video you can, but I already told you I would only watch more of you videos if you defined evolution and natural selection. You have only defined one.
jebus6kryst 2 years ago
Superb video.
DrivinWest 2 years ago
Please don't include "Evodelusionism" in the same category as science. Evodelusionism has not shown to be even slightly plausible. Yet million of fools believe in it. Get real. You do not know what real science is if you believe in a friggin religion of "Evodelusionism".
GoodScienceForYou 2 years ago
Nothing in biology make since except in light of evolution. Define evolution in a scientific context.
jebus6kryst 2 years ago
Go listen to my videos, it is explained very well there.
GoodScienceForYou 2 years ago
Why do you believe these idiots? Don't you have any objective awareness, or are you just a pawn and gullible?
GoodScienceForYou 2 years ago
I am still waiting for you to demonstrate that you know the first thing about evolution by defining it. have you done the research, have you even looked at the source I have included in this video?
jebus6kryst 2 years ago
The original definition is; the theory that creatures have morphological and genetic changes enough to change into a new species with new features, over some huge amount of time.
It is not remotely related to the new "benign" sounding definition: "In fact, evolution can be precisely defined as any change in the frequency of alleles within a gene pool from one generation to the next."
This is the inference, implication definition.
It is actually the first.
GoodScienceForYou 2 years ago
Incorrect sir. The original definition is decent with modification. That is why by definition adaptation is evolution. So yes, it is related to the change in allelic frequency over time. Inference? How is it an inference if it is observable? By definition evolution has been observed.
It is amazing, it took you two months to do one thing I asked. Now I wonder how long it will take before you look at the sources for this video as well.
jebus6kryst 2 years ago
I went to at least five different sources to give you you answer. It is your problem that it does not fit you dumb ass belief.
GoodScienceForYou 2 years ago
Your video is full of shit. You start out actually believing that arguing with creationists is some form of proof of evolution. Your religion does not stand up to any scrutiny on its own. You use creationism as a smoke screen.
I am not going to waste any more time on you. I thought you were actually wanting to learn something.
GoodScienceForYou 2 years ago
My video has evidence that you still have not addressed. Since I do not have a religion, I have no idea what you are talking about.
I have learned that you are willing to ignore all the evidence in order to keep your preconceived notion. That is something that religious people do. Yet you project that I am religious when I provide evidence to support what I accept.
jebus6kryst 2 years ago
Can you cite these sources please? I mean it is one thing to say something, it is quite another to show the evidence of doing it.
jebus6kryst 2 years ago
A little science estranges men FROM God but much science leads them back TO Him.
Louis Pasteur
bornagain001 3 years ago 2
Science is a tool that we use to understand the natural world. A god would be supernatural; therefore, science would be the wrong tool in understanding a god.
jebus6kryst 3 years ago
You are ABSOLUTELY CORRECT.
Because man exists in the PHYSICAL realm we are limited to what can be proven that is within this realm. God is SPIRITUAL and therefore exists OUTSIDE the realm of both TIME and PHYSICAL. One day when we die, just like Christ we will be resurrected and we will exist outside of the the realm of time and the physical. The caterpillar can not know what transformation is about to take place until it happens.
bornagain001 3 years ago
You are more than welcome to believe that if you like. As long as you know that, it is your belief and cannot be proven.
jebus6kryst 3 years ago
"Weakness of attitude becomes weakness of character." And "Great spirits have often encountered violent opposition from weak minds." and "The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education." Albert Einstein
GoodScienceForYou 2 years ago
If you believe in evolution, because you have been brainwashed by society, teachers, friends and parents, you will "see with evodelusion glasses" and all that you see will be "filtered" by that belief.
If you are a clear free thinker and do not take on any beliefs, "Evodelusionism" is just a religion. You never look at any premise with anything but evodelusion, so you keep getting more HEMG in your "glasses".
GoodScienceForYou 2 years ago
show me a transitional fossil in the fossil record. There is none ! there is evidence that species can have variations but only limited. I came from a ape or a fish?? Ha ha
Oh and i know what evolution is. A very highly sacred religion
adam9920042004 3 years ago
If you want to see transitional fossil in the fossil record go to a natural history museum. There are thousands of known transitional fossil in the fossil record, just because you refuse to accept that does not make them go away. I named a few in this video that you can research on your own if you like, just remember to stay off the propaganda sites and go to real scientific journals if you are going to do that.
jebus6kryst 3 years ago
There is nothing religious about the theory of evolution, just like there is nothing religious about the theory of gravity or lift. Religions depend on faith, science depends on evidence, since there is over welling evidence for evolution it is a science.
jebus6kryst 3 years ago
AGREED! I'm sick of these fantasyists comparing evolutiong to a belief.
Spirituse 3 years ago
Jebus...your example of the evolution of the lizard is NO EVOLUTION. I would like to see how the lizard evolves into an iguana. THAT'S EVOLUTION!
bornagain001 3 years ago
I have already told you that evolution is the change in alleles in a population over time. Just because you have a flawed understanding of what evolution is does not make it wrong. Please do some research into the subject that you have such strong feelings against. In addition, did you see on the description the link to observed speciation events?
jebus6kryst 3 years ago
"Just because you have a flawed understanding of what evolution is does not make it wrong."
nor does your FLAWED UNDERSTANDING of God's Word, MAKE IT WRONG.
bornagain001 3 years ago
I ever said it was. You are implying that I am because I accept evolution.
jebus6kryst 3 years ago
I just have to wonder if you ever took the time to look at any of the sources I used for this video. I mean you asked for observed speciation events and I have provided them. I am kind of hoping that your silence was because you find want you asked for.
jebus6kryst 3 years ago
LOL you are probably the dumbest person I have seen on the internet. If you wanna prove gods word to me we can go to a cave and I'll block it up with a boulder, see if youre alive in 7 days. THEN YOU HAVE A CONVERT :)!!#!P!I#!I@#)
Spirituse 3 years ago
You know, it's only a matter of time until someone makes up a fossil rabbit from the Cambrian. Creationists have brought forth fake fossils before.
And I'm sure some people believe gryphons exist or used to exist, just like some believe actual fire-breathing dragons exist or existed.
Anon11674 3 years ago
If creationists make a hoax, science will expose it like the dinosaur/man footprints in Texas.
People can believe whatever they want to believe as long as they keep it out of the science classrooms. If they want to believe in gryphons and dragons, fine, I do not care. No one is forcing anyone to be smart. In addition, if they want that gryphons and dragons were real creatures they must show evidence that they were.
jebus6kryst 3 years ago
Certainly, but the followers will believe the hoax, even after it is publicly disproved. And the leaders would happily use gryphons as 'evidence for a mammal-bird cross', and even push it into the science classroom, if they could get away with it. Remember, they're not big on evidence when it comes to their own claims and beliefs.
I was mostly just talking about possibilities, exploring where the creationists might go next.
Anon11674 3 years ago
Well done explanation.
ytben26 3 years ago