We read his Selfish Gene in a freshmen college class as an example of an author's tone- meaning, it was picked because it was supposed to show how arrogant Dawkins sounds. I never really understood why people want to degrade the term "intellectual" by calling it arrogant. Like, "hey you kid in the back with the answers to the teacher's questions, shut up! the idiots in the class don't like when other people know what they don't."
@DrRinse No kidding. I don't know why those people cannot hear how afraid they sound. I heard a Santorum quote today concerning how more than half of students who start college with faith tend to lose it at the end of their college education. If their faith cannot stand up to knowledge, then why would they want to keep it?
I'm going to be honest-- Richard Dawkins has much bigger balls than I do. I would shrink away from people criticizing me like that, not because of their own rightness or wrongness, but because I'm too damned sensitive to others' emotions, even if they are entirely wrong. It takes balls to stand up to that kind of hatred, mistrust, and ignorance, and keep on swinging.
@BIHalien84 You Christians gladly will say only their religion is true, and all other religions are false, yet the moment someone disagree with you guys, they go "please, don't be arrogant!". lmao you guys are the epitome of arrogance!
Richard Dawkins is a class act. Love how he can look someone in the face and listen to their bullshit and not flip a lid. The guy at the end is Tom Haggard and was arrested for being with a male prostitute. Why is it that so many bible thumpers are the ones who are judgmental, narrow minded, mean and hypocritical? Not very godly of them lol.
@Velox415 Totally agree! That really says something incredible for Dawkins morality.. to look someone like that in the face and not want to hurt them is a virtuous height of intellectual reasoning. As for the second guy, apparently you were EXACTLY RIGHT! I think he was arrested for that somewhat shortly after it was filmed... unreal. I wonder how you intuited that? I'm not suggesting anything, haha.
@sleepinertiac He just looks it; he just looks creepy. I really can't put my finger on it. Maybe it's something about his eyes or the way his lips jut out when he speaks and his creepy pedo smile. Listening to it again I realize too that there's something weird about the way he speaks, the inflection or something. In fact I seem to recall reading that most people can pick a pedo out of a lineup. I actually didn't know who is guy was but I see from the side now it's Tom Haggard.
And these emails are from religious people? Wow, and I thought "god" said love your enemies? I don't think Richard is feeling the love...lol....Keep up the great work Mr. Dawkins, I love you!
@sarahthedevil666 God says kill your enemies, drunk children, Egyptian children, people who pick up sticks on a Sunday, single women who aren't virgins, basically God wants a lot of people dead, he is a bit of a dick. It was Jesus said love your enemies, he was a decent bloke (although a bit misogynistic by todays standards). He wasn't a good a bloke or a better teacher than Socrates, Gautama, Feynman or Dawkins. If anyone does follow Jesus should understand he is not the only teacher.
Whenever an Atheist says something with conviction that theist doesn't like, the response always seems to be 'stop being arrogant'. Surely though, believing you're right against all evidence is the epitome of arrogance
i beleive science can explains many things and has tangible proof,what is annoying is how people like dawkins and other sceptics ridicule peoples beliefs ect,i think he probably has some bitterness cos he was probably brought up in a strict anglian home and this is some sort of reaction and quest for him
what rubs people the wrong way is how hes such a smug prick. nobody wants to hear about a fucking "flying spaghetti monster" being compared to a god that they whole heartedly believe created our very existence. its pure mockery and ridicule. he has no respect for anyone who opposes his views
THIS IS WHAT ATHEIST DAVE 474 SENT TO ME IN A PM ..( AND BLOCKED MY REPLY ) :Stop trying to hide your obvious lack of intellect little deluded one. You know your dumb (christian).
And for the last time STOP picking your asshole and then sucking on your finger! Gross Irish cunt!
So take your Dads cock out of your ass, eat the shit off it (as usual), and tell your Mother to stop being a dirty slut! Then... suicide. You know everyone wants you to....
Science precisely does not claim to have all the answers. It would put itself out of business if it did that. Religion, on the other hand, claims to have all the answers that matter to those who seek immortal security in the inevitable face of death, and no security is truly possible there, but it won't stop people from demanding it. Religion will never go out of business as long as people want shielding from that natural fact. Science can't threaten the willfully irrational, so stop yelling.
Wow! Is that Ted Haggard accusing someone else of being intellectually arrogant? So much worse than being a promiscuous, profoundly hypocritical closet case. This is the problem in a nutshell -- Haggard thinks saying he's sorry directly to God for what he's done to his wife, children and ministry (and his gay lovers) is a ticket to ride, a real slate wiper. What a creature.
come people stop hating one another. If nature can generously accommodate the peaceful coexistence of things quite opposite to eath other, why on earth are we so narrow-minded to fight over blind faith and rationality?
I noticed a pattern on the 'innocently smiling' religious people's faces - their eyes are always frowning at the big bad atheist; they can smile all they want, I don't believe they're smiling sincerely. They're pissed off.
@Recordbhoy Since I will never be in hell, that means I'll never be full of shit? Cool. But seriously, threatening an atheist with hell is sort of like some weird hippy threatening you to punch your aura unless you start believing in auras and praising the almighty aura.
@Recordbhoy Are you threatening me? Because it's not very effective. As in, not effective at all. You know what? I'll go do something productive while you go pray for the suffering of other people and the end of the world. Oh, and don't forget to feel guilty the next time you do something perfectly harmless and human, because it's probably a sin.
@ListenerOfShadows Guess what asshole , I do productive things all the time , and you're still damned to hell . And Paradise is filled with souls who had people pray for them ..too late for you though , no prayer will save you
@Recordbhoy Prove it. And don't ask me to disprove it, because the laws of physics and other scientific facts have been proven (or are, by means of logic, the most likely ones) and your little pet religion hasn't. Not a single part of its extraordinary claims has been proven and if it had, that still leaves you with a shitload of stuff that hasn't been proven.
@ListenerOfShadows I don't give a fuck about the laws of science , I wouldn't even be debating such trivia ..I'm talking about God ..who created men, who created science . Now , you claim God does not exist ..PROVE IT ..or SHUT THE FUCK UP ! ( And by the way , everything the God taught , through Christ , is now known by every single soul who has ever been born and died ..absolute proof ..even your God Hitchens now knows it ..as will you ) ..Now , god doesn't exist ? PROVE IT or STFU
@Recordbhoy Without other people's knowledge of this 'trivia,' you probably wouldn't even be alive today (and neither would I), since your religion didn't do anything to reduce child mortality rates nor to fight any disease. Scientific knowledge doesn't get created, it gets discovered, and then combined to create stuff. Do you even know how many people die without ever hearing about your Christ? We're born without religion. One could say I'm a 'reborn atheist,' lol. :D
@ListenerOfShadows 1 , Yes I would be alive today , wrong again , ( unless of course a creation of science kills me , like guns and bombs have been doing for centuries ) medical advances do not negate God ..2 . It is not the responsibility of a church to reduce mortality rates , it is there to teach Christ ( the irony of millions of infants slaughtered in abortion clinics is lost on you as well ) 3 Scientific knowledge ?? what ? so space rockets and computers were " discovered " ..WHAT !
@Recordbhoy .4 The people who die without hearing of Christ will know of him now ..they will not be held to the same account as will you , who know him , but reject him . 5 We are not born without God , it is inherent in every created child , and when his conscience grows , his wisdom and contemplation of his existence grows with him ..unless he rejects it ..like you are doing ..
@Recordbhoy Remember , when you stand before God , you have made a choice ..he will give you your choice ..and all the science in the world , won't help you then
@Recordbhoy You're even more of a lunatic than I thought... :facepalm: Do you even know the difference between 'knowledge' and 'inventions'? Knowledge (ideas, too) is used to invent things. Space rockets and computers are inventions. Besides, you don't even have real arguments, all you can say translates to 'NO! YOU'RE WRONG! I'M RIGHT! GOD! CHRIST! I JUST POOPED MYSELF FOR JESUS!' I'm sorry for wasting my time on you, won't happen again.
@ListenerOfShadows You're already as big a lunatic as I first thought ..you haven't disappointed me .I know exactly what the difference is , the problem is that you didn't .My argument couldn't BE more real ..ask you God Hitchens now ..what is more real to him now ...computers or God .. the same question you will face soon ..you stupid stupid little man ..you have the perception, wisdom and insight of a baboon ..I'm sorry I wasted my time on YOU
@dave474c I hope he doesn't, because the comment doesn't leave me enough space to insult him on account of everything he said - and with the wide array of bullshit it's just so effing hard to choose the right bit to "analyze." xD
@tensorbundle No shit, Sherlock. It's an observation (and hypothesis, if you want to call it one) made while looking at something physically real (the video footage of their facial expressions). I never said it was true, I just stated that I think it could be true. Also, 'not necessarily'? Belief itself doesn't make anything true,
@Recordbhoy Wow.. amazing. I don't know how I'll ever go on after that witty retort. It seems there is no point to anything after receiving such a cutting remark. I bet that comeback will go down in history. And in the future when religion doesn't exist, people will marvel at the fact that a creationist such as yourself with bells ringing in his fucking head could muster the required intellect to create a comment such as yours.
@dave474c Actually, there isn't any point in you going on , your destiny is already sealed .In the future, when God is revered as he should be, after his impending judgement , there will be no such thing as creationists ,. just joyful souls who knew Gods truth , and as for the bells in my head , what do I care , I'll be too happy in paradise to take notice of them ..In fact , every soul in history who accepted their God is hearing bells of joy right now ..a sound you will never know ..arsehole
@Recordbhoy You just called one of your Gods creations an arsehole. Do you realise what you've done. In your pathetically small mind, you're going to hell.
Funny how your god is such an impotent loser that he needs YOU to be his guide and decide who is going where in the afterlife. What a chicken shit piss-weak confused & scared little god you have.
You need to become a Hindu. That way, it's OK to make up your own god & tell the useless prick what to do & how to think.
@dave474c Prepare for hell you scumfuck . A certain piece of shit is already doomed , and you have the mark . You won't kick anyone's ass in the next life , your sin will be exposed to you , and the magnitude of your stupidity will finally be revealed . You are damned for hell my repugnant friend, and an eternity of suffering and torture by the demons ..I can't think of any piece of shit more deserving than you ..bonehead fucktard
@Recordbhoy Such language... I guess you'll be off to hell then. Don't worry, at least you won't have to put up with that fucking pedo maggot jesus. But if you're so convinced that you're going to heaven (which I guess is true because you seem to be the selector) just commit suicide.
Or is it that deep down you don't believe in the sky fairy at all?
And if your god needs you to choose who goes up or down, what a fucktard drooling idiot that piece of shit must be.
@dave474c " what a fucktard drooling idiot that piece of shit must be." Wow , a true God hater ..just like Satan himself ..even a repentant sinner may be saved but the deepest chasms of hell await you ..I truly pity you
@Recordbhoy Also, next time you pray to your false god, tell him that when I die, I'm gonna kick his fucking useless ass, then beat the shit out of jesus.
Then I'm gonna explain that I'll only be in heaven when I want to. Most of the time, I'd prefer hell.
You know what they say: "Go to heaven for the climate, and go to hell for the company"
@dave474c You fuckin bonehead ..you have no idea what awaits you , do you ? God help you when you stand before the creator of the universe ...a microbe like you ...I truly pity you ..you bonehead
Science is often accused of arrogance, yet is it possible to be more arrogant than believing you are made in the image of God? That God listens to your every word and tunes into your every thought?
It seems like the best way to get Richard Dawkins' attention is to send him vulgar hate mail. Maybe I can get him to convince the morons around me that they are missing subtle pieces of logic from their philosophies by sending him disparaging remarks.
@ridered300 Don't know what religion you have been checking out but their is a religion that uses scientific principles as evidence to prove itself. Just because you havn't learnt everything doesn't mean that it doesn't exist. Now which one it is I won't say, I want you to go out and check EVERY religion possible. Only that way will you eliminate all other possible scenarios. Every heard of variables in science?
@nachdehasdeh I don't care, religion is a waste of time and searching for this religion that you are talking about would be an even bigger waste of time. Think about it, how advanced could we be if nobody wasted time going to church and thinking about religion when they could be developing technologies and learning things that are applicable to real life.
@ridered300 If you don't care then that is another thing. I was under the impression that you have exhausted all avenues at researching religion hence your decision on accepting something which is still a theory. Now I do not know to what level your understanding in biology is but at University level I have learnt that evolution is not a feasible theory to conclude as a principal.
@nachdehasdeh The fossil record is convincing enough for me to accept evolution, but that's not why I don't like religion. I'll admit that I'm more agnostic than atheist. I think if there is a God, or Gods, they don't wish to be worshiped. They created everything and may protect us in some ways, but that is all. I think it's better to just enjoy your life without worrying about that stuff. It's a waste of time.
@GoodByeKyle Science is about finding out the truth about the nature of reality. It has nothing to do with people's apparent personalities. Arrogance is when the dogmatic views and assertions of those who believe in supernatural things are excepted without evidence, logical reasoning or critical thinking.
@foojuice101 Yes i know about that, it was actually a six man panel in 2010 so it allowed a full exchange of views rather than a standard academic debate. Dawkins was given the opportunity on the 25th of October 2011 to debate William Lane Craig in Oxford University on the topic of "Does God Exist?". He refused and Craig went on to speak at Oxford dismantling Dawkins arguments and explaining the existence of God.
And then Dawkins went on to say that debating Craig one-on-one would be a waste of time because he's kinda stupid. But technically, he did debate Craig.
Look mate, WLC isn't THAT brilliant. The average atheist youtuber making a video could dismantle his arguments, let alone someone like Richard Dawkins. Seriously, I've seen some YT users make arguments that blew all of Craig's "philosophical arguments for God" right out of the water.
@foojuice101 Lol yes he did say that, basically showing his own cowardice. Go make a video for me then you average atheist youtuber and dismantle William Lane Craig.
Actually, all it shows is that he *might* be a coward for not going up against Craig. All he proves is that he didn't want to debate with Craig, but no reasons were given. Maybe he is a coward, or maybe he just didn't feel like it, or maybe he thought that Craig was too stupid? We don't know his reasons and you certainly don't know them either.
Now, why would I even make a video refuting Craig when many people have already done it for me? It would be redundant and pointless.
@foojuice101 He didn't feel like it? Maybe he thought Craig was too stupid? He has reasons for not wanting to debate him and said Craig is a professional debater and that is his only claim to fame,his book says "Never cut yourself off from dissent; always respect the right of others to disagree with you. Always seek to learn something new. Teach your children how to think for themselves how to evaluate evidence and how to disagree with you.Treat your fellow human beings with respect
@foojuice101 It's Dawkins book... and he is saying that you should respect othe rpeoples opinions rather than be quick to disregard anything they say which is what he is doing with Dr.Craig. Anyways, this discussion is over since im constantly explaining things that you don't understand.
Yes, and you should respect the fact that I don't believe in a god, or in any of the rubbish that Craig says. If you do that, then I'll respect your opinions as well.
Yes, and you should respect the fact that I don't believe in a god, or in any of the rubbish that Craig says. If you do that, then I'll respect your opinions as well.
@squatchmaster5000 the thing with all these religious debates is that it comes on the faithfuls side, down to faith obviously. But theyre only arguing a Deist argument, they never really go into why they believe that their God is right , they just say there must be one, But theres a huge jump from saying there is one to i know his/its will. Religious people have and always will have a vague abstract argument based on faith which as athiests, deists. we dont have time for .
@dawtchins Science itself takes faith to believe in. Everything is based upon a theory and until proven different you believe its correct. Atheists don't understand that they themselves are a religious type system in that they try to prove God doesn't exist. Theists don't say there simply is "a" God, according to people like William he is a philosopher in christian apologetics claiming that Jesus is the Son of God. This is where you roll your eyes claiming there is no proof...
@squatchmaster5000 "Everything is based upon a theory and until proven different you believe its correct."
Not quite.
"A theory is a good theory if it satisfies two requirements: It must accurately describe a large class of observations on the basis of a model that contains only a few arbitrary elements, and it must make definite predictions about the results of future observations." - Stephen Hawking
You're confusing "theory" and "hypothesis". Even then you don't assume truth
@squatchmaster500 "[Atheists] themselves are a religious type system in that they try to prove God doesn't exist."
This is like claiming, "People who don't believe in Bigfoot are a religious type system in that they try to prove Bigfoot doesn't exit." First, I've seen very few major atheist writers try to prove that gods in general don't exist. Maybe god X doesn't exist, because of some logical fallacy in it's nature. Second, it's up to people who believe in Bigfoot to prove it, not us
dawkins repeatedly makes a point of going up against people who make themselves look like idiots thereby giving the impression that he is some kind of genius. he is a great scientist and a brilliant man. but when it comes to the topic of God, he disproves a false notion of what God is not and he missuses science in doing so. i think his intentions are right because some aspects of what ppl do with religion are disgusting. but on a philosophical level his argument leaves alot to be desired
Mr Haggard, you spent your time telling your flock how wrong homosexuality was, then used your free time doing crystal meth and rent boys. How f**king arrogant is that?
I only wish that everyone in entire whole world would wake up one day in the realisation that they themselves are in control of their own destiny, not an imaginary being that they have all been duped into believing exists.
The simple fact is we're all going to die one day - what truly matters is what we do with the time we have on this earth, not what will or will not happen there after.
Richard Dawkins is not just an eminent scientist, but also an inescapably inspiring person. And this video demonstrates it well. He has my deep respect.
Dawkins is an asshole looking for a body to attach to. The intellectual/analytical portion of his brain has become egocentric in the extreme and sit on a lofty tower judging all and every one who doesn't agree with him. I'm tending to wonder if he jumps up and down and stamps his feet from time to time when people disagree in defense of his continual attacks.
@OneFifthNative At least he doesn't use offensive language as the "learned and god-loving" authors of the e-mails sent to him. It's the theists that behave like assholes when they run out of arguments.
@melychor I just can't understand why an educated and mature man such as he is has this need to confront people in the manner he does. His overpowering zealousness for his beloved "Scientific" model of reality is, to me, a sign of a rigid and anal retentive personality. I mean, why go attack Chopra in the way he did?, highlighting his personal income, saying he "once qualified as a doctor" (He practiced for many years, including research) .. and repeating "mumbo jumbo". Debate him, not attack
@OneFifthNative I guess he is just fed up with all that narrow-mindedness and circular thinking and loses his temper at times. I forgive him. After all, he's the one who is right:)
2.06 That guy really shoots Dorkins down in flames. Dorkins thinks he knows everything. I'm an atheist too, but not his sort of atheist. He is a Humanist. And Humanism is a religion in all but name.
Science can say that eggs are healthy; after 9 years of 'RIGOROUS' testing and analysis.
They then print 'THE EGGS' MIRACLE' in their Peer Review Journals.
After that?
They just keep 'an open mind' that the enormity of the egg debockle may not still be quite solved. And when the scientists are disproven elsewhere; another peer review that reads, "EGGS: A YOKE AROUND OUR HEALTH!"
@ClockNumerology Oh, come on, be fair! In the long run it's science that helps us develop, not some dogmatic assumptions. Had it not been for science, we would all still be in middle ages believing that the sun goes round the earth and that washing is unhealthy. Unfortunately, there are lots of pseudoscientist (take creationists as an example) who claim different things just to make themselves known. The egg thing was an example of that. Don't overgeneralise.
Richard Dwag is a dog not a human....wel he may be a human but he is idiot and is so easy to see.all he does is spam anger and all his fans are angry lil trolls. I don t care if u like him if u can t see him for what he is then you are just as blind s any fondamentalist out there.you will need alot of effort to see ur eego and hate and buddha bless you
@mastakur buddha?! Why only Buddha? Zeus bless us too, and Krishna. After all, you never know which one is the real one. Or maybe Joo Joo at the Bottom of The Sea?
where can i find the interview which he did with a muslim in this clip? i've tried looking for it on youtube. if anybody knows, please guide me. Thanks.
@vicachcoup Dawkins has publicly engaged an archbishop of York, two archbishops of Canterbury, many bishops and the chief rabbi. A debate between them would look good on Craig's CV and bad on Dawkins' CV. Craig is a very uninteresting theologian who relies mostly on the Kalam argument, yawn! Watch a Dawkins vs Lennox debate, far more interesting than Craig's brand of crap.
@vicachcoup So by simply stating that Dawkins is held in higher regard than Craig, I (in your eyes) am now a Dawkins fanatic. Well by your standard I now accuse you of being a Craig devotee, doesn't seem fair now does it? If you consider Lennox as to weak a target compared to Craig, I suggest you compare their arguments and redraw your conclusions. Also give this a read: richarddawkins(dot)net/articles/643584-why-i-refuse-to-debate-with-william-lane-craig
Poor Richard Dawkins facing people with autism
oreowizard1 2 days ago
2:22 WHO IS THAT AWESOME GUY?
tehzoh 3 days ago
Holy shit Ted Haggard is friggen creppy
squizill 4 days ago
@squizill yea for sure saying "you could be great like me" and then saying "don't be arrogant" is he kidding? Does he know what he is saying?
Zir3ne 5 hours ago
The guy at the end who almost bit Mr. Dawkins in one of the most arrogant people I've seen.
SuperMatthew345 1 week ago
2:14 looks like he's gonna bite him
NickPaulOates 1 week ago
We read his Selfish Gene in a freshmen college class as an example of an author's tone- meaning, it was picked because it was supposed to show how arrogant Dawkins sounds. I never really understood why people want to degrade the term "intellectual" by calling it arrogant. Like, "hey you kid in the back with the answers to the teacher's questions, shut up! the idiots in the class don't like when other people know what they don't."
littlemoretime1 1 week ago 2
@littlemoretime1 To quote Dennis Miller, "We live in an era and time where calling someone an Einstein is considered to be somewhat of an insult".
DrRinse 5 days ago
@DrRinse No kidding. I don't know why those people cannot hear how afraid they sound. I heard a Santorum quote today concerning how more than half of students who start college with faith tend to lose it at the end of their college education. If their faith cannot stand up to knowledge, then why would they want to keep it?
littlemoretime1 5 days ago
I'm going to be honest-- Richard Dawkins has much bigger balls than I do. I would shrink away from people criticizing me like that, not because of their own rightness or wrongness, but because I'm too damned sensitive to others' emotions, even if they are entirely wrong. It takes balls to stand up to that kind of hatred, mistrust, and ignorance, and keep on swinging.
Bhikshu2 1 week ago
Richard Dawkins is an inspiration for all people to follow reason and fact and not silly superstitions.
TheWirelessBrain 1 week ago
F***ING DUMBASS
pragmatismnotidealis 2 weeks ago
2:06 min. ----The man gave him a good answer, slap in the face
BIHalien84 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BIHalien84 You Christians gladly will say only their religion is true, and all other religions are false, yet the moment someone disagree with you guys, they go "please, don't be arrogant!". lmao you guys are the epitome of arrogance!
Casshyr 2 weeks ago
He is the ape he do not knows any better way
BIHalien84 2 weeks ago
Put it this way, if there weren't religions, Atheist's wouldn't have a laugh.
DrazhiHD 3 weeks ago
LOL at the guy at 2:10 talking about intellectual arrogance when he himself say
"I know so much more"
Done...
DrazhiHD 3 weeks ago
Fuck, you can totally tell Ted is a meth addict. I can't see how no-one knew sooner.
thrashmetalteen 4 weeks ago
Richard Dawkins is a class act. Love how he can look someone in the face and listen to their bullshit and not flip a lid. The guy at the end is Tom Haggard and was arrested for being with a male prostitute. Why is it that so many bible thumpers are the ones who are judgmental, narrow minded, mean and hypocritical? Not very godly of them lol.
abstracteyez 4 weeks ago
@abstracteyez Opps I mean Ted...either way he creeps the fuck out.
abstracteyez 4 weeks ago
dawkins is god
robbin420z 1 month ago
00:54 Preparing a bitchslap
tp19361 1 month ago
That last guy was like a villain from some drama...
NexusHUBSH 1 month ago
@NexusHUBSH I was about to say that too. Great minds think alike I guess.
TheSocktor 1 month ago
I think its rather funny that Indian lady seems to have a hypnosis neckless.
Eralun 1 month ago
2:04 o.O
TheNakedQuack 1 month ago
@TheNakedQuack yeap, the guy talks about himself.
mreeuwij 1 month ago
it's crazy how defensive people get when they're caught out or feel threatened.
jimmyshitbags 1 month ago
would anyone like to buy some magic beans?
ClintIron 1 month ago
@ClintIron Your magic beans are a lie, for my mystic acorns are the one true magical seed!
T0mm3n 1 month ago
Religious argument: 'Don't be arrogant! Instead believe the universe was created just for you.'
weefeatures 1 month ago
Why do americanos have to bleep all the fucks?
AstralBanana 1 month ago
1:35 Fix your women? Wow, fuck you asshole, I would have punched him in the face at the point.
2:07 Omg that guy is creepy. He looks like a pedo.
Velox415 1 month ago
@Velox415 Totally agree! That really says something incredible for Dawkins morality.. to look someone like that in the face and not want to hurt them is a virtuous height of intellectual reasoning. As for the second guy, apparently you were EXACTLY RIGHT! I think he was arrested for that somewhat shortly after it was filmed... unreal. I wonder how you intuited that? I'm not suggesting anything, haha.
sleepinertiac 1 month ago
@sleepinertiac He just looks it; he just looks creepy. I really can't put my finger on it. Maybe it's something about his eyes or the way his lips jut out when he speaks and his creepy pedo smile. Listening to it again I realize too that there's something weird about the way he speaks, the inflection or something. In fact I seem to recall reading that most people can pick a pedo out of a lineup. I actually didn't know who is guy was but I see from the side now it's Tom Haggard.
Velox415 1 month ago
Richard Dawkins,"closed mindedness"??????? wrong!
And these emails are from religious people? Wow, and I thought "god" said love your enemies? I don't think Richard is feeling the love...lol....Keep up the great work Mr. Dawkins, I love you!
sarahthedevil666 1 month ago 8
@sarahthedevil666 God says kill your enemies, drunk children, Egyptian children, people who pick up sticks on a Sunday, single women who aren't virgins, basically God wants a lot of people dead, he is a bit of a dick. It was Jesus said love your enemies, he was a decent bloke (although a bit misogynistic by todays standards). He wasn't a good a bloke or a better teacher than Socrates, Gautama, Feynman or Dawkins. If anyone does follow Jesus should understand he is not the only teacher.
twiggy120 3 weeks ago
The camera work is so awkward...
TheLagunaSunrise 1 month ago
Oh my ''God''.. the last guy...could he look more stupid..??
oandrikos 1 month ago
Whenever an Atheist says something with conviction that theist doesn't like, the response always seems to be 'stop being arrogant'. Surely though, believing you're right against all evidence is the epitome of arrogance
neilswann80 1 month ago 2
Im sure Richard had a chuckle to himself when the last fella was exposed as a hyprocrite only a few months after the interview.
Ali74 1 month ago 2
RICHslapped! These bumbling bigoted idiots are blinded by faith. Pity is all I have for them.
TheSonorama21 1 month ago
i beleive science can explains many things and has tangible proof,what is annoying is how people like dawkins and other sceptics ridicule peoples beliefs ect,i think he probably has some bitterness cos he was probably brought up in a strict anglian home and this is some sort of reaction and quest for him
greenscorpio1967 1 month ago
why to argue with these idiots, dawkins?
alexy360 1 month ago
what rubs people the wrong way is how hes such a smug prick. nobody wants to hear about a fucking "flying spaghetti monster" being compared to a god that they whole heartedly believe created our very existence. its pure mockery and ridicule. he has no respect for anyone who opposes his views
didickcheeseburger 1 month ago
HATERS GONNA HATE.
KEEP ROLLING MR RICHARD YOU ARE AWESOME.
Nakul398 1 month ago 41
I think RD should win Man of the Year honors for managing to interview that many douchebags without vomiting all over himself.
evolve749 1 month ago 2
THIS IS WHAT ATHEIST DAVE 474 SENT TO ME IN A PM ..( AND BLOCKED MY REPLY ) :Stop trying to hide your obvious lack of intellect little deluded one. You know your dumb (christian).
And for the last time STOP picking your asshole and then sucking on your finger! Gross Irish cunt!
So take your Dads cock out of your ass, eat the shit off it (as usual), and tell your Mother to stop being a dirty slut! Then... suicide. You know everyone wants you to....
Recordbhoy 1 month ago
@Recordbhoy LOOK AT HIS SPELLING OF " you know your dumb" ... should be " you're " ..IS THE IRONY LOST ON HIM ?
Recordbhoy 1 month ago
Science precisely does not claim to have all the answers. It would put itself out of business if it did that. Religion, on the other hand, claims to have all the answers that matter to those who seek immortal security in the inevitable face of death, and no security is truly possible there, but it won't stop people from demanding it. Religion will never go out of business as long as people want shielding from that natural fact. Science can't threaten the willfully irrational, so stop yelling.
manthasagittarius1 1 month ago
Wow! Is that Ted Haggard accusing someone else of being intellectually arrogant? So much worse than being a promiscuous, profoundly hypocritical closet case. This is the problem in a nutshell -- Haggard thinks saying he's sorry directly to God for what he's done to his wife, children and ministry (and his gay lovers) is a ticket to ride, a real slate wiper. What a creature.
manthasagittarius1 1 month ago
come people stop hating one another. If nature can generously accommodate the peaceful coexistence of things quite opposite to eath other, why on earth are we so narrow-minded to fight over blind faith and rationality?
tensorbundle 1 month ago
can someone link me to the debate with the muslim that suggests women in the western world cant dress themselves?
haig271 1 month ago
@haig271 just type richard dawkins interviewing a muslim .. i see it on the side bar actually
poppyseed6969 1 month ago
Great Editing !
Lol
forgottenmemories63 1 month ago
Brainwashing, is the reason why people are brought up to believe in such drivel.
That guy at 1:25 calls science 'philosophy' and 'atheism', well I study both and I can tell you that they most certainly are not.
abisivepoo 1 month ago
richard is a legen
MrHazeification 1 month ago
I noticed a pattern on the 'innocently smiling' religious people's faces - their eyes are always frowning at the big bad atheist; they can smile all they want, I don't believe they're smiling sincerely. They're pissed off.
ListenerOfShadows 1 month ago
@ListenerOfShadows THey're full of pity for them , they know he's damned
Recordbhoy 1 month ago
@Recordbhoy And you're so full of shit you actually think they know something about the afterlife and this 'damnation' you speak of.
ListenerOfShadows 1 month ago
@ListenerOfShadows ou will be full of shit when you're in hell you scum fuck
Recordbhoy 1 month ago
@Recordbhoy Since I will never be in hell, that means I'll never be full of shit? Cool. But seriously, threatening an atheist with hell is sort of like some weird hippy threatening you to punch your aura unless you start believing in auras and praising the almighty aura.
ListenerOfShadows 1 month ago
@ListenerOfShadows You actually will be in hell . I don't care about old hippies , but you'd best prepare for hell ..it's getting closer
Recordbhoy 1 month ago
@Recordbhoy Are you threatening me? Because it's not very effective. As in, not effective at all. You know what? I'll go do something productive while you go pray for the suffering of other people and the end of the world. Oh, and don't forget to feel guilty the next time you do something perfectly harmless and human, because it's probably a sin.
ListenerOfShadows 1 month ago
@ListenerOfShadows Guess what asshole , I do productive things all the time , and you're still damned to hell . And Paradise is filled with souls who had people pray for them ..too late for you though , no prayer will save you
Recordbhoy 1 month ago
@Recordbhoy Prove it. And don't ask me to disprove it, because the laws of physics and other scientific facts have been proven (or are, by means of logic, the most likely ones) and your little pet religion hasn't. Not a single part of its extraordinary claims has been proven and if it had, that still leaves you with a shitload of stuff that hasn't been proven.
ListenerOfShadows 1 month ago
@ListenerOfShadows I don't give a fuck about the laws of science , I wouldn't even be debating such trivia ..I'm talking about God ..who created men, who created science . Now , you claim God does not exist ..PROVE IT ..or SHUT THE FUCK UP ! ( And by the way , everything the God taught , through Christ , is now known by every single soul who has ever been born and died ..absolute proof ..even your God Hitchens now knows it ..as will you ) ..Now , god doesn't exist ? PROVE IT or STFU
Recordbhoy 1 month ago
@Recordbhoy Without other people's knowledge of this 'trivia,' you probably wouldn't even be alive today (and neither would I), since your religion didn't do anything to reduce child mortality rates nor to fight any disease. Scientific knowledge doesn't get created, it gets discovered, and then combined to create stuff. Do you even know how many people die without ever hearing about your Christ? We're born without religion. One could say I'm a 'reborn atheist,' lol. :D
ListenerOfShadows 1 month ago
@ListenerOfShadows 1 , Yes I would be alive today , wrong again , ( unless of course a creation of science kills me , like guns and bombs have been doing for centuries ) medical advances do not negate God ..2 . It is not the responsibility of a church to reduce mortality rates , it is there to teach Christ ( the irony of millions of infants slaughtered in abortion clinics is lost on you as well ) 3 Scientific knowledge ?? what ? so space rockets and computers were " discovered " ..WHAT !
Recordbhoy 1 month ago
@Recordbhoy .4 The people who die without hearing of Christ will know of him now ..they will not be held to the same account as will you , who know him , but reject him . 5 We are not born without God , it is inherent in every created child , and when his conscience grows , his wisdom and contemplation of his existence grows with him ..unless he rejects it ..like you are doing ..
Recordbhoy 1 month ago
@Recordbhoy Remember , when you stand before God , you have made a choice ..he will give you your choice ..and all the science in the world , won't help you then
Recordbhoy 1 month ago
@Recordbhoy You're even more of a lunatic than I thought... :facepalm: Do you even know the difference between 'knowledge' and 'inventions'? Knowledge (ideas, too) is used to invent things. Space rockets and computers are inventions. Besides, you don't even have real arguments, all you can say translates to 'NO! YOU'RE WRONG! I'M RIGHT! GOD! CHRIST! I JUST POOPED MYSELF FOR JESUS!' I'm sorry for wasting my time on you, won't happen again.
ListenerOfShadows 1 month ago
@ListenerOfShadows You're already as big a lunatic as I first thought ..you haven't disappointed me .I know exactly what the difference is , the problem is that you didn't .My argument couldn't BE more real ..ask you God Hitchens now ..what is more real to him now ...computers or God .. the same question you will face soon ..you stupid stupid little man ..you have the perception, wisdom and insight of a baboon ..I'm sorry I wasted my time on YOU
Recordbhoy 1 month ago
@Recordbhoy lol u mad
ListenerOfShadows 1 month ago
@ListenerOfShadows He's mad alright. Lol....
You wait till he gets started on who he's gonna send to hell..lol
Have fun if he gets back to ya ;>)
dave474c 1 month ago
@dave474c I hope he doesn't, because the comment doesn't leave me enough space to insult him on account of everything he said - and with the wide array of bullshit it's just so effing hard to choose the right bit to "analyze." xD
ListenerOfShadows 1 month ago
@ListenerOfShadows your belief doesn't necessarily make something true.
tensorbundle 1 month ago
@tensorbundle No shit, Sherlock. It's an observation (and hypothesis, if you want to call it one) made while looking at something physically real (the video footage of their facial expressions). I never said it was true, I just stated that I think it could be true. Also, 'not necessarily'? Belief itself doesn't make anything true,
ListenerOfShadows 1 month ago
richard dawkins need to hire a bodyguard or some nut job is going to point a gun at him one day
Mrinebriation 1 month ago
The reason people are pissed off at Richard Dawkins is because they don't like their cosy little fantasies to be shattered by the truth.
I85PIES 1 month ago 15
I want to put a couple cloths-pins on that last guys lips..holy shit
NaturalSelection101 1 month ago
Surely religious types must look at their representatives and think... fuck.. am I one of those boneheads?
The answer is yes. Yes you are.
dave474c 1 month ago 2
@dave474c Actually I think you're a bonehead
Recordbhoy 1 month ago
@Recordbhoy Wow.. amazing. I don't know how I'll ever go on after that witty retort. It seems there is no point to anything after receiving such a cutting remark. I bet that comeback will go down in history. And in the future when religion doesn't exist, people will marvel at the fact that a creationist such as yourself with bells ringing in his fucking head could muster the required intellect to create a comment such as yours.
Bonehead.
dave474c 1 month ago
@dave474c Actually, there isn't any point in you going on , your destiny is already sealed .In the future, when God is revered as he should be, after his impending judgement , there will be no such thing as creationists ,. just joyful souls who knew Gods truth , and as for the bells in my head , what do I care , I'll be too happy in paradise to take notice of them ..In fact , every soul in history who accepted their God is hearing bells of joy right now ..a sound you will never know ..arsehole
Recordbhoy 1 month ago
@Recordbhoy You just called one of your Gods creations an arsehole. Do you realise what you've done. In your pathetically small mind, you're going to hell.
Funny how your god is such an impotent loser that he needs YOU to be his guide and decide who is going where in the afterlife. What a chicken shit piss-weak confused & scared little god you have.
You need to become a Hindu. That way, it's OK to make up your own god & tell the useless prick what to do & how to think.
Bonehead.
dave474c 1 month ago
@dave474c Prepare for hell you scumfuck . A certain piece of shit is already doomed , and you have the mark . You won't kick anyone's ass in the next life , your sin will be exposed to you , and the magnitude of your stupidity will finally be revealed . You are damned for hell my repugnant friend, and an eternity of suffering and torture by the demons ..I can't think of any piece of shit more deserving than you ..bonehead fucktard
Recordbhoy 1 month ago
@Recordbhoy Such language... I guess you'll be off to hell then. Don't worry, at least you won't have to put up with that fucking pedo maggot jesus. But if you're so convinced that you're going to heaven (which I guess is true because you seem to be the selector) just commit suicide.
Or is it that deep down you don't believe in the sky fairy at all?
And if your god needs you to choose who goes up or down, what a fucktard drooling idiot that piece of shit must be.
Religion = Dumb.
dave474c 1 month ago
@dave474c " what a fucktard drooling idiot that piece of shit must be." Wow , a true God hater ..just like Satan himself ..even a repentant sinner may be saved but the deepest chasms of hell await you ..I truly pity you
Recordbhoy 1 month ago
@Recordbhoy And stop picking your asshole and then sucking on your finger.
It's fucking gross.
I don't care if you learnt it in sunday school boy just fucking stop.
Bonehead shitsucker!
dave474c 1 month ago
@Recordbhoy Also, next time you pray to your false god, tell him that when I die, I'm gonna kick his fucking useless ass, then beat the shit out of jesus.
Then I'm gonna explain that I'll only be in heaven when I want to. Most of the time, I'd prefer hell.
You know what they say: "Go to heaven for the climate, and go to hell for the company"
Bonehead.
dave474c 1 month ago
@dave474c You fuckin bonehead ..you have no idea what awaits you , do you ? God help you when you stand before the creator of the universe ...a microbe like you ...I truly pity you ..you bonehead
Recordbhoy 1 month ago
Science is often accused of arrogance, yet is it possible to be more arrogant than believing you are made in the image of God? That God listens to your every word and tunes into your every thought?
intrigued1231 1 month ago 25
That USA man at the end seemed like a complete serial killer psycopath!!
opera123able 1 month ago
It seems like the best way to get Richard Dawkins' attention is to send him vulgar hate mail. Maybe I can get him to convince the morons around me that they are missing subtle pieces of logic from their philosophies by sending him disparaging remarks.
rossplendent 1 month ago
@1:55 The David Brent of Christianity
AdamBatayneh 1 month ago
0:49 "Science has become so arrogant in it's premise that it has all the answers..."
Science doesn't claim to have the answers, but it is the approach to prove the hypotheses to be the answers.
Religion claims to have the answers and claims not to need evidence, THAT IS ARROGANCE!
ridered300 1 month ago 50
@ridered300 Don't know what religion you have been checking out but their is a religion that uses scientific principles as evidence to prove itself. Just because you havn't learnt everything doesn't mean that it doesn't exist. Now which one it is I won't say, I want you to go out and check EVERY religion possible. Only that way will you eliminate all other possible scenarios. Every heard of variables in science?
nachdehasdeh 1 month ago
@nachdehasdeh I don't care, religion is a waste of time and searching for this religion that you are talking about would be an even bigger waste of time. Think about it, how advanced could we be if nobody wasted time going to church and thinking about religion when they could be developing technologies and learning things that are applicable to real life.
ridered300 1 month ago
@ridered300 If you don't care then that is another thing. I was under the impression that you have exhausted all avenues at researching religion hence your decision on accepting something which is still a theory. Now I do not know to what level your understanding in biology is but at University level I have learnt that evolution is not a feasible theory to conclude as a principal.
nachdehasdeh 1 month ago
@nachdehasdeh The fossil record is convincing enough for me to accept evolution, but that's not why I don't like religion. I'll admit that I'm more agnostic than atheist. I think if there is a God, or Gods, they don't wish to be worshiped. They created everything and may protect us in some ways, but that is all. I think it's better to just enjoy your life without worrying about that stuff. It's a waste of time.
ridered300 1 month ago
@ridered300 100% agree
valitz17 1 month ago
@ridered300 "Science doesn't claim to have the answers, but it is the approach to prove the hypotheses to be the answers."
"[S]cience knows it doesn't know everything, otherwise it would stop."
-Dara O'Briain
kissfan7 1 month ago
@kissfan7 nice quote
gat0rgirl13 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
@ridered300
Right after Derpak says that, Mr. Dawkins looks rightfully affronted. How can someone say such a stupid thing?
TheSonorama21 1 month ago
where is the clip from 1:35? thanks
2012felixx 1 month ago
@2012felixx watch?v=-8b3vhTO248 found it here :)
chelseaintheorchard 1 month ago
Dawkins is arrogant... which isn't good science
GoodByeKyle 2 months ago
@GoodByeKyle hes just defending science against those who are claiming their dogmas are science
dawtchins 2 months ago
@GoodByeKyle Science is about finding out the truth about the nature of reality. It has nothing to do with people's apparent personalities. Arrogance is when the dogmatic views and assertions of those who believe in supernatural things are excepted without evidence, logical reasoning or critical thinking.
bp8322 1 month ago
0:07 Very coragous question to black man indeed! :D
Petrhrabal 2 months ago
TED HAGGARD IS FUCKING TERRIFYING
GotmyplaceinHell 2 months ago
@GotmyplaceinHell that's what his male whore said while ted was up on crystal meth
PatRibsey 2 months ago
Please debate with Dr.William Lane Craig you coward.
squatchmaster5000 2 months ago
@squatchmaster5000 he already has look it up you fool
dawtchins 2 months ago
@dawtchins He hasn't had a one on one debate with him.
squatchmaster5000 2 months ago
@squatchmaster5000
He's already had a debate with him
foojuice101 2 months ago
@foojuice101 He was given the opportunity to debate Dr.Craig one on one very recently but refused.
squatchmaster5000 2 months ago
@squatchmaster5000
No...he actually had a debate with him and two (?) other people. I've seen the clip.
foojuice101 2 months ago
@foojuice101 Yes i know about that, it was actually a six man panel in 2010 so it allowed a full exchange of views rather than a standard academic debate. Dawkins was given the opportunity on the 25th of October 2011 to debate William Lane Craig in Oxford University on the topic of "Does God Exist?". He refused and Craig went on to speak at Oxford dismantling Dawkins arguments and explaining the existence of God.
squatchmaster5000 1 month ago
@squatchmaster5000
And then Dawkins went on to say that debating Craig one-on-one would be a waste of time because he's kinda stupid. But technically, he did debate Craig.
Look mate, WLC isn't THAT brilliant. The average atheist youtuber making a video could dismantle his arguments, let alone someone like Richard Dawkins. Seriously, I've seen some YT users make arguments that blew all of Craig's "philosophical arguments for God" right out of the water.
foojuice101 1 month ago
@foojuice101 Lol yes he did say that, basically showing his own cowardice. Go make a video for me then you average atheist youtuber and dismantle William Lane Craig.
squatchmaster5000 1 month ago
@squatchmaster5000
Actually, all it shows is that he *might* be a coward for not going up against Craig. All he proves is that he didn't want to debate with Craig, but no reasons were given. Maybe he is a coward, or maybe he just didn't feel like it, or maybe he thought that Craig was too stupid? We don't know his reasons and you certainly don't know them either.
Now, why would I even make a video refuting Craig when many people have already done it for me? It would be redundant and pointless.
foojuice101 1 month ago
@foojuice101 He didn't feel like it? Maybe he thought Craig was too stupid? He has reasons for not wanting to debate him and said Craig is a professional debater and that is his only claim to fame,his book says "Never cut yourself off from dissent; always respect the right of others to disagree with you. Always seek to learn something new. Teach your children how to think for themselves how to evaluate evidence and how to disagree with you.Treat your fellow human beings with respect
squatchmaster5000 1 month ago
@squatchmaster5000
Wait, wait, wait...what the fuck does Craig's (or Dawkin's) book have to do with anything?
foojuice101 1 month ago
@foojuice101 It's Dawkins book... and he is saying that you should respect othe rpeoples opinions rather than be quick to disregard anything they say which is what he is doing with Dr.Craig. Anyways, this discussion is over since im constantly explaining things that you don't understand.
squatchmaster5000 1 month ago
@squatchmaster5000
Yes, and you should respect the fact that I don't believe in a god, or in any of the rubbish that Craig says. If you do that, then I'll respect your opinions as well.
foojuice101 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@squatchmaster5000
Yes, and you should respect the fact that I don't believe in a god, or in any of the rubbish that Craig says. If you do that, then I'll respect your opinions as well.
foojuice101 1 month ago
@squatchmaster5000 the thing with all these religious debates is that it comes on the faithfuls side, down to faith obviously. But theyre only arguing a Deist argument, they never really go into why they believe that their God is right , they just say there must be one, But theres a huge jump from saying there is one to i know his/its will. Religious people have and always will have a vague abstract argument based on faith which as athiests, deists. we dont have time for .
dawtchins 1 month ago
@dawtchins Science itself takes faith to believe in. Everything is based upon a theory and until proven different you believe its correct. Atheists don't understand that they themselves are a religious type system in that they try to prove God doesn't exist. Theists don't say there simply is "a" God, according to people like William he is a philosopher in christian apologetics claiming that Jesus is the Son of God. This is where you roll your eyes claiming there is no proof...
squatchmaster5000 1 month ago
@squatchmaster5000 "Everything is based upon a theory and until proven different you believe its correct."
Not quite.
"A theory is a good theory if it satisfies two requirements: It must accurately describe a large class of observations on the basis of a model that contains only a few arbitrary elements, and it must make definite predictions about the results of future observations." - Stephen Hawking
You're confusing "theory" and "hypothesis". Even then you don't assume truth
kissfan7 1 month ago
@squatchmaster500 "[Atheists] themselves are a religious type system in that they try to prove God doesn't exist."
This is like claiming, "People who don't believe in Bigfoot are a religious type system in that they try to prove Bigfoot doesn't exit." First, I've seen very few major atheist writers try to prove that gods in general don't exist. Maybe god X doesn't exist, because of some logical fallacy in it's nature. Second, it's up to people who believe in Bigfoot to prove it, not us
kissfan7 1 month ago
Lol at the last guy
Rudenko3 2 months ago
dawkins repeatedly makes a point of going up against people who make themselves look like idiots thereby giving the impression that he is some kind of genius. he is a great scientist and a brilliant man. but when it comes to the topic of God, he disproves a false notion of what God is not and he missuses science in doing so. i think his intentions are right because some aspects of what ppl do with religion are disgusting. but on a philosophical level his argument leaves alot to be desired
carlose0318 2 months ago
That Ted Haggard interview went south....months later homo Haggard's life went south. Oh how I love the smell of truth in the morning!
bermudaguy1 2 months ago
Mr Haggard, you spent your time telling your flock how wrong homosexuality was, then used your free time doing crystal meth and rent boys. How f**king arrogant is that?
wjhopper 2 months ago 2
Ted Haggard's behavior strongly suggests that the man is a psychopath. A real one, not this Dexter Morgan character.
metrogoldwinmeyer 2 months ago
right about there being no god, and right about religions poisoning people's minds
melychor 2 months ago
I was an agnostic and thanks to his book I have no doubts now. You might consider me a convert Richard. Thank you.
melychor 2 months ago
@melychor Welcome to the rational world!
JaytheOstrich 2 months ago
I only wish that everyone in entire whole world would wake up one day in the realisation that they themselves are in control of their own destiny, not an imaginary being that they have all been duped into believing exists.
The simple fact is we're all going to die one day - what truly matters is what we do with the time we have on this earth, not what will or will not happen there after.
7in7in7in 2 months ago
Richard Dawkins is not just an eminent scientist, but also an inescapably inspiring person. And this video demonstrates it well. He has my deep respect.
eukaryotebag 2 months ago
Dawkins is an asshole looking for a body to attach to. The intellectual/analytical portion of his brain has become egocentric in the extreme and sit on a lofty tower judging all and every one who doesn't agree with him. I'm tending to wonder if he jumps up and down and stamps his feet from time to time when people disagree in defense of his continual attacks.
OneFifthNative 2 months ago
@OneFifthNative At least he doesn't use offensive language as the "learned and god-loving" authors of the e-mails sent to him. It's the theists that behave like assholes when they run out of arguments.
melychor 2 months ago
@melychor I just can't understand why an educated and mature man such as he is has this need to confront people in the manner he does. His overpowering zealousness for his beloved "Scientific" model of reality is, to me, a sign of a rigid and anal retentive personality. I mean, why go attack Chopra in the way he did?, highlighting his personal income, saying he "once qualified as a doctor" (He practiced for many years, including research) .. and repeating "mumbo jumbo". Debate him, not attack
OneFifthNative 2 months ago
@OneFifthNative I guess he is just fed up with all that narrow-mindedness and circular thinking and loses his temper at times. I forgive him. After all, he's the one who is right:)
melychor 2 months ago
@melychor Right about what exactly?
OneFifthNative 2 months ago
2.06 That guy really shoots Dorkins down in flames. Dorkins thinks he knows everything. I'm an atheist too, but not his sort of atheist. He is a Humanist. And Humanism is a religion in all but name.
tigranvartanovitch 2 months ago
Science can say that eggs are healthy; after 9 years of 'RIGOROUS' testing and analysis.
They then print 'THE EGGS' MIRACLE' in their Peer Review Journals.
After that?
They just keep 'an open mind' that the enormity of the egg debockle may not still be quite solved. And when the scientists are disproven elsewhere; another peer review that reads, "EGGS: A YOKE AROUND OUR HEALTH!"
ROFLMAO
ClockNumerology 2 months ago
@ClockNumerology Oh, come on, be fair! In the long run it's science that helps us develop, not some dogmatic assumptions. Had it not been for science, we would all still be in middle ages believing that the sun goes round the earth and that washing is unhealthy. Unfortunately, there are lots of pseudoscientist (take creationists as an example) who claim different things just to make themselves known. The egg thing was an example of that. Don't overgeneralise.
melychor 2 months ago
Comment removed
ClockNumerology 2 months ago
Richard Dwag is a dog not a human....wel he may be a human but he is idiot and is so easy to see.all he does is spam anger and all his fans are angry lil trolls. I don t care if u like him if u can t see him for what he is then you are just as blind s any fondamentalist out there.you will need alot of effort to see ur eego and hate and buddha bless you
mastakur 2 months ago
@mastakur buddha?! Why only Buddha? Zeus bless us too, and Krishna. After all, you never know which one is the real one. Or maybe Joo Joo at the Bottom of The Sea?
melychor 2 months ago
Oh God end the world now......
joey143anna 2 months ago
Ted Haggard's top lip really irritates me.
joannakatewallace 2 months ago
the woman at 1:50 is hilarious. total phoney.
morrossey 2 months ago
Ted Haggard is completely heterosexual
The proof is here if you watch this video watch?v=HZmHC75FDqQ
aussiesam01 2 months ago
where can i find the interview which he did with a muslim in this clip? i've tried looking for it on youtube. if anybody knows, please guide me. Thanks.
adkdi 2 months ago
@adkdi I think the clip with the muslim was from "Root of all evil: the god delusion" toward the end of the clip
DrWoodwind5 2 months ago
@DrWoodwind5 i am just looking for the programme in which he interviews the muslim, i can't find it anywhere on youtube.
adkdi 2 months ago
@adkdi the documentary is called "the root of all evil".
metrogoldwinmeyer 2 months ago
@adkdi I believe the doc is called "The Root Of All Evil"
wjhopper 2 months ago
Dawkins seen here debating all manner of people
Funny how he turned down a debate from Craig who would have presented a far more intellectual argument.
Put simply, he is an intellectual bully - and coward
vicachcoup 2 months ago
@vicachcoup Dawkins has publicly engaged an archbishop of York, two archbishops of Canterbury, many bishops and the chief rabbi. A debate between them would look good on Craig's CV and bad on Dawkins' CV. Craig is a very uninteresting theologian who relies mostly on the Kalam argument, yawn! Watch a Dawkins vs Lennox debate, far more interesting than Craig's brand of crap.
Mandragara 2 months ago
@Mandragara
'A debate between them would look good on Craig's CV and bad on Dawkins' CV'
OK so you are a devotee - and have learnt his mantras.
Don't believe a word of it - Dawkins chickened out plain and simple - he is fine with untrained debaters as per the clips above.
Lennox? A colleague of Dawkins - so not so intimidating for him. Further proof he is chicken.
vicachcoup 2 months ago
@vicachcoup So by simply stating that Dawkins is held in higher regard than Craig, I (in your eyes) am now a Dawkins fanatic. Well by your standard I now accuse you of being a Craig devotee, doesn't seem fair now does it? If you consider Lennox as to weak a target compared to Craig, I suggest you compare their arguments and redraw your conclusions. Also give this a read: richarddawkins(dot)net/articles/643584-why-i-refuse-to-debate-with-william-lane-craig
Mandragara 2 months ago
I hope Richard Dawkins isn't discouraged by this