Added: 1 month ago
From: tysiphonehelp
Views: 20,789
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (279)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Im proud of being Korean lollol ^__^* Thanks!!!

  • @thepleaseNO456 Damn, how much did it cost?

  • Cool technology.

    But beats the purpose of having

    a TV in the living room.

  • Cant really see this being a big hit but good idea though ,could cause eye problems for sure lol

  • Nahhh im fine with my 55 inch LG 3d the newest one lol

  • fucking great

  • Can you play 16player battle field 3?

    16 different screens?

    Now that's fucking awesome

  • Nice ! Do you know when it's comming to Europe ?

  • ur lucky u try new stuff

  • Can you Sony simulveiw

  • for 6k ill just buy two tv's

  • samsung copies everybody don't they?

  • Now I can really pretend I am enjoying her shows.

  • and the sound -.-?

  • @mohammed773 Did you watch the video?

  • @19TheLegend96 ohh i got it now lol

  • 'With my own eyes..' Who's eyes I will be seeing then?

  • @karsfan11 As opposed to watching through the camera like you did here.

  • that is crazy!!!

  • Now way

  • would you need headphones to have sound?

  • You´re gonna get some serious epileptic problems with that tv

  • coolest thing I have ever seen!!!!

  • Can one person watch two video streams at the same time with this technology?

  • how does the sound work?

  • @Koalafishy he said bluetooth audio...

  • i already had this since 10 years ago, its called TWO televisions.

    Just buy 2 tvs for 300dollars each.

  • I heard the price and my jaw broke the floor below me. But the tech is pretty cool.

  • @JayyKwok didnt need the full details but thank you and hell yeah I would want this in my freaking house that sh!t is amazing

  • It's called light polarization. One image is projected vertically and the other is projected horizontally. The switch between the glasses is just the change of planes. So mode A can be taking in light vertically and mode B is taking images horizontally. This works because the images projected is a transverse wave. PHYSICS FOR THE WIN!

  • pretty cool. im getting this when it comes out

    

  • this is incredible..i love it

  • Comment removed

  • But will it ble....wait im not gay

  • i already have this with my SONY 3d display bitches

  • The wife and husband idea is not really great..For example:

    Husband screams and cheers for his team in basketball.

    Wife cries while watching some romantic shit.

    I'll stick to the gaming idea for this...

  • This thing is gonna be beast!

  • this is perfect for call of duty multiplayer... finally no more screen cheating

  • You want the normal split-screen in games so you can cheat ;)

  • works well****

  • this product sounds sooooo good and it will reduce fights with the family

  • MINDFUCKED :0

    

  • what does it do with audio?

  • @littlejr555 the glasses has built in audio

  • Sony does got the same thing...I got it and it works great

  • good review, but take that chain off, your white, be proud of it.

  • Cool tech but you look tired... get some rest. :)

  • Now I can watch porn with my family

  • @sdfdsv Yeah but I'll doubt you'll just start fapping right infront of them? XD

  • @sdfdsv woah, nice. 

  • @sdfdsv hahahhaha 

  • thats boss as hell

  • OMG I WANT THAT

  • Let's have that TV for gaming and tv watching!!

  • the only thing im worried about is if the glasses will hurt your eyes for long viewing sessions.

  • and for the same price of that 1 T.V. you can buy 3 42" Google T.V.'s and now you have a TV in bedroom one in living room and another in the mancave! =)

  • I just hope Ty is still attending school. His English is pretty terrible.

  • @HmoobMike He was home schooled.

  • oh men that tv is cool , and the orice is good and reasonable cool!!!

  • @zack2245 lol i meant price **

  • What about the sound though?

  • $6,000 price, no. However, the first Plasma screen TVs cost that much. Would I like this technology-- absolutely! When the drop to 800-1,000 they will be all anyone wants. But at $6K, I can buy a current technology TV for every room in my house and two for the den. Hopefully, that price is on the high side.

  • Does this ruin eyes?

  • mind rape

  • Sweet! But it don't matter anyway since I got my own tv. Hehe. Is this something you would want ty?

  • Sounds impressive, but not that excited to be honest. If two people wanna watch different stuff, would they really prefer to watch the same TV which requires that they both wear 3D glasses and headsets?? I believe this technology is great for those who can only afford one TV (maybe in terms of space). Otherwise, I don't think it's gonna be that useful to be honest. Would rather buy an extra TV to watch my own stuff without wearing 3D glassed and a headset.

  • impressive

  • 6000 dollars is kinda high you know it if you said 1200-2400 i would understand because normally that how much higher end tis cost but 6000 screw that shit the wife will watch soap down stairs and i will watch the game upstairs problem solve

  • Nice!

  • Want!

  • Nice!

    

  • @TheBillit

    My uncles got that Mustang in Red with black stripe but better and faster cos the engines modded.

  • Whooww cool..!

  • the is already something in every TV in the world its a mode called PIP ..

    or you can just buy 2 tvs like i did XD

  • That mustang ....WHAT A RIDE !!

  • Ty, you need to go get some lessons on English. It is painful at times.

  • When flat screens first came out it was literally 10,000 dollars at Costco for a 42 inch TV. That was only 5-7 years ago.

  • Cool

  • not only does this technology work good? lmao this is like listening to a 5 year old

  • It's 1 tv but 2 screens!

  • call me when i can watch one out of each eye.

  • What is the size? Samsung just took a crap on Panasonic with the new tvs at cse.

  • How many fucking ads can he stuff into this video damn

  • man that shit is nasty yo I want it now

  • apple TV will kill this samsung

  • problem is that those shutter glasses cost like a hundred bucks

  • 5 grand for this, i would rather buy 2 60" samsung 8000 series

  • @123tejas yes but the technology is the same as active shutter to get a display which was what I tried implying. Still wearing glasses is a drag especially when your work revolves being around displays

  • That shit cray!

  • lol thats a nice tv, the only draw back is having to wear the glasses and the head set. lol i can just imagin watchin tv with someone and a commercial comes on your screen about animals gettin raped and beatin up and the person beside you is laghin they ass off xD, you know their lookin at somethin else but it would still be weird!

  • That's awesome!

  • the playstation monitor is amazing andd the dual image is amazing

  • It's nothing new, I would rather pay attention on the OLED technology, which have the best picture quality.

  • What sort of husband wants to watch a soap opera...

  • @darknessAlchemist00 you can get earphones wirelessly i think theses are connected to the glasses

  • What I'm trying to figure out is how would sound work?

  • But the Sony's version is 1080p LED and its in 3D sooooo

  • OMG ME AND MY SISTER FIGHT ON WHAT WE WANT IT WOULD BE PERFECT!!!!

  • Omg the future is here

  • finally!!! Screen-Peeking is gone!!

  • personally don't want to have to wear a set of glasses to watch tv. if they break or get lost u have to put out another $100 to watch tv? i'm good with my ordinary lcd 1080p

  • I except voor 6k at least a 60 inch, 2 glasses and good software...

  • This isnt that new i have a range rover and they have this in it but you dont need glasses. So you can see sat nav and the passenger watches tv.

  • This is one sad TV, watching tv is supposed to be about the experience with others.. not sitting side by side and watching different shows. What is the world coming to?

  • Meh I don't like 3-d movies because I think it's just a way for you to spend money, not a way of the future, and I also don't like wearing the glasses which is why I returned my 3-d tv which was 42' and got a 50'

  • @NotGayMexicans this isn't a 3d tv lol

  • what is the point of it?????

  • ok wait did he just say that 6000 dollars for a TV isn't too bad?

  • 6 grand? You could buy several awesome TVs for that price. And if you wanna play multiplayer games, you could buy multiple consoles and system link for that price.

  • This is really amazing, but until the technology gets cheaper, I think it would be better to just get two normal full HD tvs

  • LG has this too.

  • Didnt sony do this first???

  • It's amazing but it wouldn't work for me lol I have one eye that doesnt work (lazy eye)

  • Never. When i watch tv i watch it with my family together

  • Omg this is so cool!

  • Totally pointless buy 2 50inch 3d tv for like 1000s

  • I think its better to get 2 tvs...

  • thsts cool, if you are not living alone

  • Range rover done this first in their cars.

  • I dont want this tv i think this is not cool

  • "Ya, sure honey, I'll watch the soup opera with you"

    GOTCHA!!!!

  • That's really cool

  • thats pretty cool

  • damm wtf 2 differents sound and channel or video´s i want that

  • Awesome

  • or you could change the channel...

  • Tv is cool but I would have to try on the glasses and make sure they don't get me all dizzy like 3D glasses .

  • already done by sony way better and only 500 dollars

  • Cool now you can watch porn while someone else is watching Oprah

  • OMG AMAZING

  • Sony was the first to create this technology and of course they don't get credited.

  • @guyaneseDJ13 Your parents created you and i'm sure you don't thank them for that every day of your life.

  • This might be the only reason active shutter glasses would be worth it.

  • Sony overrated LG has passive 3D with uses the same as the theater glasses. Basically you have a theater in your house for 1300$ 3D smart tv 10 pairs of glasses active shutter is ancient compared to passive full 1080p

  • Chuck Norris could do this 10 years ago.....

  • Comment removed

  • Sony did it first and a lot cheaper..

  • What stays in vegas, needs to stay. (some of these gadgets i hope stay in Vegas)

  • That price is just to Ridiculous you can buy 2 44 inches and she can watch what she wants in a room and he can watch what he wants in another room. 6000 dollars they out of sight

  • I love Samsung they are doing some cool stuff, but if I am going to pay $6,000 for a T.V. you better throw in the damn glasses that make it work for free...

  • Sony 3d tv. Was 1st

  • This will be good when I get my money tree, they done that at CES yet?

  • 6GRAND TV?!!!!

  • or just get 2 monitor for that price...

  • All this junk at CES, but I'm still waiting for my SMELL-O-VISION! 

  • It'd be cheaper to just buy two TVs and standard headsets for audio... >.>

  • Which spouse wants to watch what?

  • Lg has the biggest Oled Tv 3D Smart tv do a reviewwww

  • This looks awesome. But I think they should have it work like the screen in that Mercedes AMG car where you sit on the driver gets to see one screen such as the navigation. While the other passenger gets to see TV music video stuff connected from the iPod I think it's cooller than the tv TV

  • Yeah sell ur soul to the devil

  • Of course we want that TV, but we just can't afford that shit.

  • Heyyyy check outt the LG stufff pretty awesome

  • Wowowowowowowow

  • I totally want this!!

  • Pretty cool!!

  • That's amazing.

  • mmmm 6000 dollars, alright let me check my car for coins.

  • i want it

  • COOL

  • This the best TV I have ever seen! SAMSUNG is technology amazing!

  • Samsung is AWESOME

  • Just imagine the arguments that it will but to an end

  • I want it for gaming. I hate having the screen split. Everyone always screen peaks

  • Sony's version of this type of TV is called Simulview or you can watch 2 video images full-screen on their PS 3D gaming monitor. But Samsung with OLED this is mega ultra beast

  • I see a whole new experience of multiplayer gaming!

    Just imagine: You could play a shooter (or something) against a friend on the same TV without having to use an ugly splitscreen. This would be amazing!

  • I have diahrrea.

  • WoW

  • Ty, I think you might be wrong. From what I can tell, it seems to work by polarization.