Added: 4 years ago
From: militaryvideo
Views: 333,700
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (286)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Battlefield 3 brought me here.

  • Американский язык является жаргоном английского, и это факт)

  • @Balalaika0buxlo pozdrav za tebe ruski brate iz Srbije.

  • a decent jammer would make this shit useless..just sayin

  • @KRAUSER0130

    ...your jammer will be shred to pieces by long-range SAM's a la S-300

  • @brocalfur in case you didnt know,jammer can be device a bit larger than cd player..

    this thing can only take out planes..if it pops counter-measures its waste of missiles than..and when the soldier with decent anti-tank weapon come,you will have scrap metal

  • @KRAUSER0130

    Geez are you thick...All modern Russian SAM's are highly mobile and operate within a multi-layered defense network. Don't you think they have advanced counter-jamming tech? Even the oldest S-75 could operate under heavy jamming (skilled crew is needed of course). Or newer much more capable systems than Tunguska like Pantsir-S1 or

    Sosna-R? Also the Russians are famous for their 'maskirovka' abilities.

  • I bet Gadhaffi wishes he had a few of these right now

  • янки,go home

  • hellfire missile will take them out

  • @gareththomasnz Only if mounted on a F-15 or something & not after risking the missile itself & the aricraft. AH-64 or AH-1 will be torn to pieces in seconds.

  • @gareththomasnz lol this shot down your helfire about 30km xD

  • @gareththomasnz i think this sees the helicopter first^^

  • i saw both systems in action,and the gepard was better,faster and mor accuracy,and just as a notice,both can use aa-rockets

  • @Stennar Tunguska is beeing replaced by Pantzir and Gepard is getting out of service also..And i doubt any western AA system is better than any contemporary/counterpart Russian/soviet made.. We use TorM1 and Crotale TorM1 surpasses the French system by far..Same goes for the Patriot Pac2/3 and S300 PMU1/2

  • it would be like shooting bb gun at a b52 b

  • пиндосы не пиздите на странице с русской техникой,валите в мак дональдс и жрите булки трехэтажные

  • @LiSEvGeNiyLiS Angliyskiy, ychi! Eto ne Russkaya stranica, eto Utub! Otkroy svou stranicy e razvlekaysya..

  • @scuba36fun

    Английский учить?А оно мне это надо?Не говори мне что делать,а я не скажу куда тебе идти.

  • the german aa-tank gepard is much better^^

  • @Stennar its not

  • @Stennar oh? how so? youre a rocket scientist of some kind?

  • @Stennar this is an anti aircraft vehicle not A TANK

  • can you people STOP wasting your time on these ignorant Americans? I am an american, I am not ignorant, but I will tell you that the ones that think SOOOOO highly of our nation have opinions that can NEVER be changed, because frankly, some, or many, Americans are just plain stupid and ignorant. I love my country to death, but just forget about them.

  • And Vehicles is not a Easy target when was digged in And camuflaged in some forest terrain.It's shown on our tank losses in Kosovo War 1999.when calculated destroyed vehicles and nuber of flights and firem missiles or droped bombs is clear that the hit just Models of tanks made from wood, tubes, And old Stoves.

    Its a fact and there are video profs that they shoting maketes of Mig-29 on runway Its same with serbian M-84 (Copy of T-72).

  • В рот ебали мы ваш апач!!

  • That all great but what if the radar can't see the target..? as in B-2, F-22 or F-117

  • @aandc2005

    1. It's not supposed to fight F-22, or F17, or F-15 or F-16 for that matter, it's designed as a defence from attack helicopters and attack aircraft ( like A-10). This machine is supposed to travel with tanks/infantry and make sure no Apache takes a shot at them.

    2. If radar fails, then you manual control that bitch.

  • @aandc2005 I think The f-117 is show how much is invisible on decimetar wawe russian radar 1999 Serbia.And this is low range SAM and it's non made for shooting targets which are very high.

    It's used to pretect armored Vehicles against A-10 , Ah-64 .......

  • @TunguskaSerbia yeah so F-22's or B-2 could easily take out the most of them from high up like 60,000ft, cool weapon I like it, but these plane don't show up on radar, russian or american made radar, I understand it's not suppose to fight F-22's but used for A-10's but why not use something that dosen't show up on radar, it's war...thats what we used in the first few mins of this thing with libya..B-2 bombers...again cool weapon and I'm sure it works great against A-10's & Apache copters!

  • @aandc2005 I agree with you on some way but US Air Force Can't Deliver That amount of Flyghts F-117 ,B-2

    , F-22, (Its cost a lot ) on large scale operations Agains some Low value targets it's job for a -10 , F-18, f-15 ,ah-64 Which is easy pray for tunguska on low level flights.But 2K22M can't fight with F-22 or B-2 on normal battlefield its true.(Ant that is not they purpose)

  • @aandc2005 And some of them its' show on radar after some Adaptation.F-117 was shoot down with S125 Neva.(Vietnam era SAM).You may think what will do the S400 in Right Hands.It's a facts I not Hate your country or your people we just Talking about Military Hardware ,do not understand me wrong.

  • Comment removed

  • can someone tell me what this thing is?

  • @brunofig1 this is a Soviet designed AA tank which is pretty strong considering it's remote controlled rockets and powerful machine guns (the same caliber as a mini gun's)

  • It's killer of helicopters like Apach.

  • Enemy Triple-A Spotted

  • @lairdriver You obviously dont know what you're talking about xD

  • @lairdriver china has the most billion-air in the world. Hong Kong ,Macau and Taiwan are chinese. chinese are very rich. china rich man already invest billion of dollars to buy big company in usa and europe. you will be surprise your boss or big customer are chinese.everything are made in china. USA already collapse. USA = people are lazy stupid and fucking Fat.

  • @Holykid15 Haha sure kid, when will your igoistic stereotyping stop lmao faggot

  • this is number one anti aircraft equipment of the world.

  • @tongpeter2010 Technology from china. Chinaman teach russian engineer and scientist new technology. Russian depend china for money and technology. Most russian scientist, engineer, rich man are chinese. in future, chinaman will help russian in politics. Chinaman will be russian next prime minister, president.minister and china will help russian to rule this country

  • @Holykid15 Hahahaha, lol you wish bro...technology from china. wow man either you are just trolling, or you are just clueless. China is the one that buys tech from Russia, and then illegaly produces more. Russia's still up for it though since its doing pretty bad from an economical stand point..so yea, keep dreaming.

  • @Holykid15 CHINA TEACH RUSSIA ARE YOU FUCKING MENTALLY UNDEVELOPED?

    STUPID FUCK CHINA COPY RUSSIAN/EUROPEAN/AMERICAN DESIGNS ILLEGALLY

    NOONE FUCKING LIKES YOU CHINKS, ESPECIALLY IN RUSSIA

    HUNDREDS OF ILLIEGAL CHINKS ARE MURDERED WEEKLY IN CHINA

  • @MultiAREE Last word meant to be Russia

  • @MultiAREE You fucking rapist. mother fucker. chinaman buy 3 triilion usd bonds. china a lot of money, usa fat,stupid and lazy.  russian very poor and country are infested with rapist and muderer

  • @Holykid15 Haha yeah sure kid , keep dreaming, maybe someday you will stand for something more than Runescape and Starcraft

  • dont lean back when you come out of the hatch? o.0

  • any identifiable nato shootdown?

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Well, these things are not only annoying in games, but in real life too. Even the first look at it is like O_O

  • enemy AA vehicle spotted

  • Непонятно, что нам хотели показать? Я сам бывший оператор наведения ракет.

  • Is this series of vehicle amphibious.

  • this video could have been accomplished with a picture

  • Peru compro 24 de estos juguetes a la federacion rusa en 1995

    en el gobierno de Fujimori

  • Where can I buy one ?

  • Чё здесь интересного. На что смотреть?

  • THAILAND is the BEST!!!

  • The ALARM is a missile like "fire and forget" (literally "fire and forget") have a particular function "wait". In this mode, the ALARM reaches an altitude of 12,000 m and 21,000 m, turn off the engine and deploys a parachute. During the descent awaits the lighting of the sensor to hit, if a radar is activated, the rocket motor ignites a second and goes on the attack. If the radar of anti-aircraft battery is not activated, the duration of braking down the missile is enough to pass free of the att

  • Good for air defense, but a great Case Study, becomes visible to radar, armor weak, very vulnerable to the rockets.

    The radar operated for automatic tracking and vulnerable to missiles, AGM-88,

    'S MBDA ALARM Air Launched Anti Radiation Missile is a British anti-radar missile

  • Se ve poderoso

  • i want 1 of these for the weekend

  • yes i want this to guard my house. yes yes yes

  • höhö, cool anti infatrie tank :D

  • радар с китая заказывали?

  • @Bugrovskiy с чего такие умозаключения? :)

  • @legospb от того что я пиздец какой умный! !

  • what is the point of this video? it just shows a big metal thing that sounds constipated

  • тупой американский язык!!! даже выразить и изложить красочно ничего что хотят сказать не могу (инвалиды судьбы)

  • @MrVlad003 Согласен с тобою полностью пусть учат наш ВЕЛИКИЙ И МОГУЧИЙ!!!!!

  • @MrVlad003 Эй заткнись

  • @MrVlad003

    А у американцев разве есть официальный язык? если мне не изменяет память то во всех штатах нет официального языка.

  • I've never been in the military but it seems logical to me that if you have a spinning radar dish (or whatever you call it) on top of a tank it only seems to draw attention more easily. I mean that's something you would have seen on an American tank probably 40 years ago. I'm sure they have learned to incase the damn thing by now. Looking impressive doesn't win wars. :P

  • OMFG, whose attention?! The main idea of this type of air defense systems is to let them have everything on one vehicle, Including radars. They cover and protect troops when they are MOVING>.

  • I know. I just thought it would be a funny thing to say because we don't require much visual confirmation these days with all the electronic gear that acts as our eyes from afar. The truth is there most likely one controller of a once two power fight that has branched out into many smaller powers. They're arming us all for end times. They're called EVIL

  • sorry, I did not get who is EVIL? Tunguska, and famous Shilka are quite good short range air defense systems. They fit pretty well into traditional Soviet strategy of the iron fist of tank armies. Now they are going to be obsolete of course.

  • This is by no means a tank, its a platform that allow for increased all terrain capability. Unlike the Americans, Russians accounted for the fact that you can't have roads everywhere.

  • It looks like a tank, I see tracks on it. "It's a platform"? what is that. you mean it is a stationary piece of equipment that is dropped into place? I guess that makes it easier that it can't run away from our stealth bombers ;)

  • By estimations of foreign experts the complex "Tunguska" has no analogues in the world and is for today the most powerful antiaircraft system of such class.

  • Tunguska is indeed one the most effective AA system in our days for short rang ,and for the spinning radar if it make you a problem you can shut it down :) ,a weapon will last a weapon , the most important is to make a good use of this weapon by using the best strategies to fit with it.

  • @bluevidcam

    The vehicle has a diesel engine that is practically blinding in IR imaging. A little spinning metal thing is irrelevant. It is there to take out attack helicopters and low flying aircraft.

    "seen on an American tank probably 40 years ago" -laughs

  • After reading your posts, buddy, I think the best thing for you is to just STOP thinking about all this army crap... It overloads your clear mind and distorts that perfect picture of the world inside your head. Thus bringing EVIL to the planet :((( in an impressive way...and please, don't join the military!

  • This is not a tank, this vehicle stays behind the front units.

  • @bluevidcam

    Neither does being retarded.

  • nice pvo

  • Who doesn't see the irony in the name? Tungaska Was were a Meterorite struck with the force of an atomic weapon going off and leveling the area in 1908. Some people believe it had something to do with a serbian born American name Tesla who used a Ray gun and circled the planet and destroyed Tunguska. And that Americans now have that technology strapped to the cone of a plane that can now take out tanks 5 miles up.

  • @bluevidcam Tesla never considered himself an american.

  • Stop lying. Show me a valid resource site which he was heard or had written he never considered himself an American. He came to the US and worked with Thomas Edison in his late 20s and stayed and died in America at the age of 84. He lived most of the last of his 59 years of life in the US while visiting Serbia (Croatia) family over the years. He was very American. He may have been born and raised into his 20s in Serbia but He became An American to live its free lifestyle to work as he wanted

  • @bluevidcam I read his memoirs, and he had the lowest possible opinion towards Edison, Marconi, and others who stole his ideas and patents. The only person who he had respect for was Mark Twain. He moved to america because of financial reasons because in europe nobody understood his concepts not that in americans understood them eitehr but were willing to finace him. Although he did live in america he never embraced the american system and life, he despised capitalism and refused to become rich.

  • @bluevidcam He was a very complex person, his level of mental capacity was far beyond everyone in this world, he called einstain a liar and accused him of stealing Rudjer Boskovic's ideas regarding relativity.

  • russian has a tradition to name air-defence units like a russian rivers. For example, Oka, Pechora, etc.

  • It doesn't do much, does it ?

  • amount of troops & men are not the oly factor my brothers. The FIGHTING SPIRIT of every brother-in-arms is the most crucial. i'm sorry but that's the virtue dat u don't have, that we filipinos take care of ours- whenever, whereever,whatever, whoever, ever GOTESCO... got that sir? : )

  • Pantsir-S1(SA-22 Greyhound)

  • 2 x 30 mm 2A38M and combined rate of fire of between 3,900 and 5,000 rounds per minute. a great vehicle,and ''Shilka'' also still may be useful

  • I think that thing is ugly as hell but efficiency counters that lacking part quite well.

  • that gives a great idea for a close defense of soft targets against medium range ballistic weapons that we see in middle east actions - a ultra-cyclic 30mm dual barrel with rapid radar at 10 ghz and medium cyclic radar at 450 mhz for at-horizon monitor ... very slick and enviable piece of equipent

  • One of the better land-based low altitude anti-air systems today! =)

  • It is very beautiful one of a kind, Can I get one for my collection?

  • i know what i want for christmas

  • It looks like a "Red Alert" tank... :)

  • stupid gamer kids.

  • i want this toy!

  • Hi ! What is the effective range of this weapon against aircrafts ?

    Thanks !

  • 4-5km with guns 10-15 km with missiles

    Pantsir S1 missile range is up to 25 km

  • ГРОЗНОЕ ОРУЖИЕ!!! (а она стреляет?)

  • красотка.

  • o ja these are nasty man deadly combination

  • any more info-specs ..please!??

  • да, это оружие мне очень понравился

  • these things are annoying as fuck in ARMA 2

  • agreed, and sine they can easily ripp you into pieces when you are infantry as well.

  • If you enjoy discussing Russian military, join us at the Russia Defence Forum. Check my profile for the link.

  • nice

  • Harpoon24 hat aber recht!

    Gepard Bester FlakPanzer!!

  • Gepard is the Best!!

  • I'm sorry, Gepard didn't fire SAMs. Tunguska wins.

  • Estas equivocado, El Gepard si puede lanzar misiles SAM, Busca aqui en youtube: Gepard Flakpanzer Anti-Aircraft Tank by KMW , en el tiempo 2:57 ahi veras que si. Saludos

  • Never seen those attachable SAMs, the basic Ghepard doesn't have.

    Why they don't make them available, so the crew doesn't have to exit the vehicle and attach them, losing precious time?

    And what kind of SAMs are they?

  • SA-19's with to 40mm auto cannons

  • You are talking about Tunguska's SAMs, i was replying to the interesting video linked by

    Harpoon24, that shows a German Gepard firing some attachable SAMs i've never seen

  • I have one in my back yard. Won't be bothered by those damn birds for a while lol

  • LMAO Coltsfreak1856

  • nice comment man

  • Nice comment man

    Hey does anybody watching this video know the difference between Tungushka and Shilka?

    If you do, let me know

  • From what i know the shilka has four 23mm automatic flak cannons, the Tunguska i has two 30mm flak cannons in addition to 8 air to ground missiles. Both are semi-robotized having the ability to autonomously track and lock onto low-flying aerial targets.

  • 2A38 guns of Tunguska are double barreled - so it has 4x30

  • @MarshallJukov i see one barrel

  • @Jackosaki

    kbptula. ru/eng/str/cannons/2a38m. htm

    2A38 is derivative of Gsh-30 cannon

    kbptula. ru/eng/str/cannons/gsh30. htm

    They have two barrels that share one mechanism

  • The radar alone will probably fry a bird when in tracking mode. God forbid the neighbor kids fly kites though!

  • Gundam!

  • 1 s-400 can monitor most of Iran airspace and shoot down all kinds of stuff... I doubt Russia would sell s-400 to Iran.

  • That thing looks mean.. im sure it can chew apaches and what not out of the sky. Not very usefull against high flying jets though.

  • its a SAM, it can take on high flyer's too. what do you think those rockets on the side are for?

  • For jets when they fly low. And 'slow'. What, you think this thing can take down F-15s if they decide to fly at Angels Thirty?

  • Тунгузка это вещь, классная вещь :)

  • Nice!

  • Sweden Rules!!!

  • look on ur face... ))) U so ugly ..

  • you a rat

  • S-300/400 and the Pantsir-S1 ?

    The USA will launch a Bio or Nuclear attack on Iran i think. Or maybe both. New world order is coming people, wake up. 9/11 was an inside job.

    Then its WW3 planned with China.

  • Tunguska is a river, the tributary of Enisey river. and vehicle was called in the name of that river

  • oh i thought it was named after the tunguska explosion of 1908

  • that explosion was alaso called in the name of the river Tunguska where the meteorite fall down

  • Actually it wasn't a meteorite.. ;-)

  • @fludblud You do some flying on Apaches))))) And then when you will become a ghost you will tell.....

  • hehehe looks deadly...^^

  • Dont them guns get in the way of the radar...

  • No. If it did, it wouldn't have been placed there. =)

  • the radar is placed on the turret

  • fact russian old rpg shoot down apache helicopter and h-60 h-53 and cobra over baghdad

    an old rpg against high tech chooper what a shame U.S PIG!!!!!

  • fact-> patriot missle is not much effective against scud missle... israel has been bomb multiple times with their patriot missle defense

    what an embarrasment to the U.S pig!!!

    fact sam missle shoot down f-117 and f-18 over serbia and also your high alttitude spy plane U.S pig

  • And yes, by the way S-400 will not be on sale in foreign countries. Only S-300 and those with updatings... Though I to Iran would make an exception.

  • Well very few people knows that 30 mm of a down at Tunguski are very quickly heated. That does not allow it to conduct continuous fire on the purpose. In other indicators it surpasses the western analogue in times....

  • Still a good classic anti-air but you dont want to miss with new S-400

  • Tunguska, it all the same differs from complex S-300 (S-400). æ-300 it is calculated on ballistic missiles first of all. S-400 (though and officially it it is not necessary on arms) it is calculated ALREADY on defence of orbital space. So air defence class is not comparable... First of all, tunguska it is calculated on an easy air/land armour. And as infantry on direct/rocky district.

  • another good target practice for longbow :D, keep delivering the toys boys, maybe next time you will come-up with the real thing like RPG.

  • Awesome comment... Only the longbow is about as stealthy as a flying fuel truck, so it would be dead long before it switches on its hellfires. And that's only if the AH64s get past medium range guided AA--which they wouldn't. On a bigger note, it's really refreshing to see Americans still smug about their military dominance. One sure fire way to stay on top is to constantly underestimate your adversaries(read: sarcasm). I predict the US DOD will be buying foriegn-made systems within a decade.

  • Russian equipments such as this are only good on paper specs. in real battle they are always owned and always smoking on the road w/out any kill :D this thing will be highly effective against some MiG-23 of turkey i guess :)

  • Keep playing world in conflict bud...(with cheats)=P

  • what a noob! Tunguska-M1 was specifically made to protect tank columns from helicopter like apache.

  • well that's what it is at least on paper! but in real war it is a different story... T72/62 tanks always end-up smokin dead based on history :D so this one won't change the outcome!

  • well said well said m8, I totally agree with your prediction, Russian weapons are one of the best, its effectiveness were shown in the recent Lebanon war against Israeli Merkava tanks.

    If I was a president of a country I would buy weapons from Russia why? because their weapons are equivalent or better than the U.S and at a lower cost.

  • You realize that all RPG weapons are Russian correct? And that a Single RPG-29 has punched through a Challenger-2 tank, twice. In other words, Russian hand-held anti-tank weapons penetrate some of the best-armored tanks in the world with one direct impact. No other hand-held missile can do that, and the Javeline can only do it by striking a tank from above. One EMP goes off, and all your little electronics are useless.

  • F22Ownage ....is probably the only amarican gay...sorry ...i meant guy :) that goes through most of russian military videos and says...`o that is so shit` ... I don't know what ur motive's about this are?...is it envy..is it hatred....is it stupidity ...is it a mixture of everything....just go and embrace the us military ...somewhere else!!! the russian military equipment achieves the same results and even higher with far less money compared to US military equipment!!!

  • yeah so right, i just couldnt have written this better myself, that guy just loves writing patronising shit on all videos that feature russian tech. What a fucking losser!!

    All he knows is that: America fuck YEAH! Gona save the motherfucking day YEAH.

  • I understand it was a display and it probably wasnt loaded BUT if someone was sitting in that chair when the Tunguska fired that would suck!

  • Those Tunguska M1s are nice for destroying common APCs and IFVs.

  • Where can I order one of these in the states? I am a real bad shot when it comes to duck hunting and I think this might help me out ;)

  • Чё, опять америкашки рисуютя? Ржу не могу, пешы естчо