This all comes down to is retraining the companies we work for, through yet ANOTHER bogus scam. Our companies are already hurting, and this clown known as Al, he's wanting to hit us again. Gore and his band of scam-scientists want to cash in on our hard earned money. We all know when a company is forced to pay for something, they cut their work force to pay for it.
Well, this is all good with Al. You see, his company will GAIN. Google his companies website. He's ready to cash in. Global HOAX!
al you are such an alarmist well i don't supose you can't make millions without putting up good show and by the way how come the ocean hasn't risen if the ice has melted at the poles
I have been using the world's best and most up to date supercomputer to forecast what the climate will do in the next decades. The conclusion is that the climate will cool abruptly with winters being very harsh. Measures must be taken now to prepare for the coming cold. Human intelligence is a wonderful thing. Why don't you try using it to end the warming scam?
So CO2 causes climate change? Studies show that is not a relationship. If anything atmospheric CO2 is influenced by temperature levels and not the opposite.
funny im yet to see any up trend since 2001 , any one seen any ?, after all it has been 9 yrs.
Also anyone actually seen any real sea level change. Sureley ther is a beach dweller somewhere ?? Cummon surely there is a single person living on a beach ...? isnt there ?
The most lies I have ever heard in 5 mins, Gore you are a liar extraordinaire.
The biggest greenhouse gas is cloud... water vapour, responsible for 98% of all global warming... he seems to have forgotten that, plus the story that followed his interview, fuckin ICE EVERYWHERE, so where is your warming now Gore
If "environmentalist political and business elite" who push the agenda, were really interested in saving the planet, those that comply and recycle, etc etc should be rewarded for contributing not penalised for compliance through new taxes. That is so counterproductive! Unless you are a CEO or Exec. of a carbon tax credits or on the Chicago carbon exchange etc. It is firstly a money making machine, and secondly an arm of the Agenda 21, UN ultimate depopulation program.
The largest single source of CO2 is man? That's just utter bullshit. A volcano could burb up more methane than the total output of all our industry for a decade tomorrow, and the world would be no worse for the wear than it was during the medieval warming period (the period that Gore omits from his big graph in his movie). Fact is, the Sun's output is a far greater factor than man's CO2 output. That's why every inner planet, not just the Earth, is also rising in temperature.
"The north polar cap is disappearing right now"!!!
He has really gone over the top now, they Ice caps are growing, but he is still sticking to the lie. Sea level rises? Where is it rising, his bath tub?
I think you are the one taken in, but you are entitled to your opinion. I'm talking about an eruption like Krakatoa, not the output levels talked about in that study. Personally, I'll take the opinion of climatologists that don't have conflicts of interest like the IPCC.
and what lies, specifically are you referring to? think about why this label "climate deniers" is part of the drumbeat of the globalist's agenda. look i am not saying we don't need to clean up industrial waste and pollutants, far from it. i just think the global warming agenda has been co-opted by elitists and globalists for purposes of profit and hegemony, and cap and trade and carbon taxes are absolutely the wrong way to go about it.
@HeavyMechanics. Lies uncritically accepted by deniers: 1. The sun explains recent warming 2. The MWP was a global phenomenon & was warmer than today 3. It is getting cooler 4. The arctic sea ice is not disappearing 5. Polar bears have survived a complete arctic melt 6. CO2 does not affect the earth's energy balance 7. All the planets in the solar system are warming 8. The sea level is not rising 9. The extra CO2 is not anthropogenic etc If your opinion is based on such lies, it is worthless.
Climatologists, the scientists you would call "deniers" are not saying "the sun explains recent warming". What certain climatologists are saying is that the Sun, and it's radiation interacting with the toposphere, is the primary driver of climate. They are also not saying CO2 does not affect the earth's "energy balance". All climatologists agree that CO2 levels are in direct correlation with global temperature, the point of contention is to what extreme this is true. The equation isn't simple.
@HeavyMechanics. Surprisingly we may be on the same page. The "dissent" if you can all it that among working climatologists is about the mechanics of climate systems, and the magnitude of warming predicted by the models. 'Skeptics' like Pat Michaels, Roy Spencer & John Christy agree that CO2 has an effect, but they contest how big that is. I have yet to see them account for the warming that's occurred over the last 40yrs.
Sadly the lay denier community embrace and parrot the lies I listed.
I was reading a bit into the Sun aspect more, because, heck, what do I know... and it seems the Sun is getting hotter, but very slowly over billions of years. It wouldn't explain the temperature rise over the last decades. But in all honesty the temperature rise over the last 40 years does not seem extreme at all compared to the MWP, and most of it occurred before our biggest industrial output. The ice cap shrunk back during that time as well.
HeavyMechanics. Here are a few more refs on the sun:
1. ww w.mps.mpg.d e/dokumente/publikationen/solanki/c153.pdf (this concludes the warming since 1975 cannot be due to the sun)
2. rspa.royalsocietypublishing.o rg/content/464/2094/1367.abstract (abstract only. this notes that solar forcing has declined over the last 20yrs while temps have risen)
3. ww w.acrim.c om/Reference Files/Sun & Global Warming_GRL_2006.pdf (note Fig. 2 and the divergence of temps and solar forcing in the 20th century.
4.w ww.warwickhughes.c om/agri/lockwood2007.pdf (this shows solar forcing, whichever way you measure it has declined since 1985 while temps have risen)
Despite what deniers would have you think, climatologists are well aware of the sun's importance in driving temperatures. Before the industrial revolution it was the main driver. The problem is that the sun alone cannot explain recent temperature rises. Especially those that have occurred since the late 20th century.
I think you may be right about some points, but I think we must do something about global warming now. If some kind of carbon tax is not the solution, then what is? We must stop producing CO2, and I think that a tax, just enough to make renewables competitive, would be very effective at achieving this.
more lies, and more hide the decline, more suited arguements and labling those who look at facts 'climate deniers' its never open, shoving people out of hte way and shutting off their mikes when they ask Gore questions is so propaganda is idiotic. Does the sun cause the heat, duh? can polar bears swim, duh? Co2=pollution, then shut up Gore and stop polluting!
the hacker let go not only emails but, documents with info about the software that blowjobs friends at the cru used. and the software is corrupt. blowjobs friends say "the science", "the science behind", "the science". hay blowjob ! the softwaer is fucked. so the so called science is fucked! and the cru knows this and so do you blowjob.
What the hell, where did Al gore get his Atmospheric/meteorologist degree from? You cant just learn this shit from layman's view. He is the biggest scammer, he actually claimed that the icecaps will be gone in 5 years at copenhagen. Would like to see that.
how can it be that the temareturen has increased on other planets, relative to the sun ? does our CO2 emissions affect the other planets too ? I doubt it...
Look, people who actually care about climate change don't care about "Climategate" whatever that is. I care about science and facts so I don't pay attention to any of this nonsense and no one else should either. I'm going to go back to reading my environmental science textbooks which actually contain facts.
Where do you think there is more money, in proving global warming wrong or proving it right?
As you guys always say, follow the money.
The money involved in scientific research is pennies compared to big Oil Profits. And its not like scientists get funding depending on the outcome of their research. Unless theyre on like Exxons payroll, they get paid by the government just for doing research, not for coming to specific conclusions.
Mountains of evidence......I'm sure you believed the " scientists " when they were telling Americans that smoking cigarettes was good and relaxing....it's amazing what conclusions well paid scientists can come up with
maybe you should check into who stands to gain from " climate change " legislation, and who has been funding " climate science "......sucker
ENRON invented the Carbon Credit Scam for fecks sake
Honestly, there are lots of parallels you can draw between AGW and the health effects of tobacco and the public opinion revolving those, but I found your take on it baffling, as I would draw quite the opposite conclusions. Big Oil (especially Exxon) are using exactly the same propaganda-like tactics spreading disinformation as Big Tobacco used to alter public opinion and instill confusion even when there was strong scientific evidence linking smoking with cancer. And sadly, you're all buying it.
You've got to be kidding me right ? EXXON just cash in on 3 billion dollars worth of subsidies to search for Natural Gas in New Guinea...part of the " green " plan. They also spent more than 120 billion dollars of their money and yours ( more subsidies) in the last decade preparing for these new regulations by getting cleaner. They are ready and waiting ....
EXXON does not stand alone in a vaccum, EXXON's major shareholders are also major shareholders in every other Global Corporate Superpower
EXXON, Royal Dutch Shell, British Petroleum were all funding Climate Science.......some of the intercepted e-mails even detail scientists begging for more money from EXXON and others soliciting from Royal Dutch Shell
These are not companies that stand alone....their shareholders are also invested in The Banking Cartel that runs that IMF and Central Banks, they are also invested Carbon Markets and Trading Schemes
these people have their hands in everything and you are playing right into them
Mountains of evidence? Have you read the e-mails from the IPCCC?
If the evidence was correct there would be no need to "trick" the data or avoid peer review. The evidence would speak for itself.
Newton, Darwin, Einstein (just to name a few) dealt with plently of skepticism and stood the test of time. These guys are too busy attempting to avoid any discussion about the e-mails and simply attack the skeptics instead of providing convincing evidence.
Uh, have you even researched what the emails mean in context before jumping to conclusions?
"Trick" does not mean what you think it means in scientific literature
Please everyone, I know you hate Al Gore and all that and its fun jumping to conclusions with emails taken out of context, but if you're gonna get opinionated about this, atleast take some time to research the emails in context and see if they really ARE incriminating or if thats just more bullshit from skeptics
I have a pretty extensive background in science and "trick" is not a word ever used in scientific literature. I find it very disturbing how the climate "change" movement has become so entwined with politicians and corporations that are using the enviromental movement as an excuse to profit from it.
As for taking things out of context. That's just a lame talking point Al Gore & Friends use to avoid the debate. Attack the attacker and avoid proving them wrong because they can't.
How nice, my earlier comment got 17 thumbs down in 12 hours in a video with very little views, a bot no doubt. You guys are starting to resemble creationists more and more with your tactics. Or perhaps it was some oil company worker whose job it is to take down comments like mine.
People need to remember that Al Gore is also a religious man, he belives the earth is comeing to an end, the sky is falling in, he belives man can walk on water, a stick can turn into a snake, that man can come back from the dead, he bleives in gods, that man can part water, of a virgin birth. HE IS ONE NUT CASE
I never thought I could feel this much animosity towards another human being!...grrrrrrrr......If only we could believe that he is just a fool, unfortunately he knows EXACTLY the lies he is telling
It takes 10,000ppm before people would start to feel dizzy. 600ppm is nothing. Compared to the past some might say Earth is CO2 impoverished. Look back through history at some of earth's previous periods when animals and forest thrived in CO2 levels in the 1500-4000ppm. How could the largest animals that ever lived live in that much CO2? Jurassic Period-1800ppm, Cambrian Period-7000ppm.
During the late Ordovician Period ICE AGE CO2 levels were 4400ppm. 11 times what they are today. It was very cold. Not hot. Don't take my word. Look it up.
No man made CO2 back then either.488million years ago, How can it be? Can there be something else affecting climate other than CO2? How about that big, hot burning bulb that beats down on us? I think the heat is about over and before this century is over it is going to start getting cold.
This is do the the ice cover(lack of vegetation) and volcanism. Plants could survive as the temperature rose because of the high C02 levels rose. This gave plants the opportunity to absorb the additional carbon to the relative levels it is today. Remember.. climate is not just one figure but a system, balances of variables.
I absolutely agree climate is more complex. Which is why I say they just do not have enough of the variables of climate to justify singling out that CO2 (manmade on top of that) is the culprit. It just happens to be the one that they can make the most profit off of. Why don't they go after water vapor it encapsulates CO2 and all other GHG's combined. Why? Because they can't make money off evaporation.
I cannot stand it when he uses the word "Climate Deniers". Such a nasty catchphrase. They are not denying that Climate is changing, has changed or will change. They are denying that CO2 is the culprit. You know CO2 just happens to be the one that they can eventually make the most profit off of. Water vapor is the single greatest GHG. It is more than all the others combined. How to get ppl on board Mr Gore. Stand up at the Copen. Summit and demand that all of this be accomplished NON PROFIT!
I guess you don't understand science. The Scientific method is not a matter of opinion. Man has taken the amount of C02 from 275 to 390. Science has reported on what that does. To "not believe" peer reviewed papers is to be in opposition to the scientific method itself. That being true, your opinions of science don't matter. If you were color blind, I wouldn't ask you your opinion of the beauty of a sunset. Learn what the scientific method is all about.
I think I should scream bloody murder next time I hear mention of the word "peer review" in regards to climate science. Peer review is a rigged game. Haven't the emails made that much clear?
I'm so fucking sick of people like you. You have the nerve to condescend to people about science, when all you have in your back pocket is a few talking points you plucked from some liberal message board.
These scientists did not practice the scientific method. That much is plain.
You don't understand or apparently believe in the scientific method. Do you have cell phone? A computer? All the physics were arrived at by the method. You cannot "rig" peer review. That proves you don't know what peer review really is. That means we can't discuss facts because you don't understand them. Again, we lose your valuable civic voice in a black closet of ignorance. Please learn what peer review is.
I understand the scientific method far better than you my friend and this isn't the first time that the peer review process has been in question regarding this science. These emails just confirm what was already suspected.
Better get off your high horse. You're not nearly as smart as you think you are. You're just another ideologue.
Actually, if you followed up the result of that supposed "suppressed" paper. It made it's way into the IPCC report anyways.
And as for Balinunas & Soon 2003, that's evidence that a small journal can let a REALLY idiotic paper slip through it's weak peer review process.
(Where they question in these emails if Climate Review is actually up to the task of a legitimate peer review process, if it can drop the ball on something so obviously flawed)
This subject should be split into two major problems.
1. Conservative versus Progressive-thinking was : Some want to keep on going the same direction and some want to change course. (usually an own-interest-story)
2. Sceptics and Buyers now do - or do not believe what the Main Media sells them.
My first concern is now how to figure out which news-source is reliable and to be prepared mentally to a fading democracy. Later we can decide which course to sail.
at the beggining gore asserts that people opposed to his plan do not want to do anything about pollution problems. WRONG! what we do not want is a tax on our very breathing. i think everyone agrees that soot and pollution is a bad thing not only for the enviroment, but for us as well. taxing every man women and child and continuing down the path we are treading is NOT solving the problems we have created, we have the technology of solar and wind powerbut are still drilling for oil.goreismoot
Why would you write that last sentence? What in anything I have said would lead you to such an outrageous statement? I just want all of us to know what SCIENCE is. It's not fake-able on that scale. The facts are in. People try to poke holes in the science but no go. It's been decades. We can certainly discuss what to do about the facts so we assure clean air and water, but to pretend that science can be faked to match your emotions removes your valuable mind from the conversation.
Yes absolutely, pollution is definitely a problem in our society, but the question is whether it pertains to global warming on a reasonable scale or not, a question which Mr. Gore has skillfully avoided answering. And I fail to see how the use of more nuclear energy is a good idea, especially in light of our ongoing efforts to keep Iran and other up and coming economy's from using it.
Not necessarily, it's been true for quite some time. However the primary thing that changes that is changes in earth's orbit relative to the sun. (And about an 800 year lag, caused by the time it takes to change the temperature of the bottom of the ocean)
greyfalcon. net/ climate2
Catch being, changes in earth's orbit takes many tens of thousands of years.
And the earliest evidence of significant human civilizations only goes back 1 set of ten thousand years.
Had a great comeback but my daughter goosed the page. Suffice it to say, I think we have a limited understanding of carbon sinks to make any definitive statement on equilibrium.
I had to read his book in college. Such BS! This is coming from the man that says he invented the internet? Copenhagen Treaty is the start of more loss of liberty and taxation for the Elites benefit. Wake Up!
The level of paranoia and downright hate in the denier community is nuts.
C'mon folks, the cause of the warming cannot be proven 100%, however, its a reality. The prevailing theory is that burning shit (and as a species we burn a LOT of shit) is causing it.
What I see from the other side is a religious fervor, which, like religion is based on nonsense. When confronted with two theories, one supported by NASA vs one supported by some bozos who scream "conspiracy" ad nauseum, NASA wins.
He just ignores the questions and says what he wants. There was a question, 'what percent of CO2 comes from man', NOT ''what is your opinion on what percent global warming is due to man'. Annual CO2 input from man is somewhere around 3%. The atmosphere is also around .038% CO2. Gore just ignored the question (as usual).
The majority of CO2 in the atmosphere is manmade? In October 2000, the Department of Energy estimated that about 3 percent of the CO2 in the atmosphere was caused by man.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA...humans are the problem. How convenient that the EPA deems CO2 a pollutant right as the Copenhagen Summit commences. Al Gore is a liar and a fraud. I hope once all is said and done that he get put in jail.
Didn't Al Gore just meet with Obama? He got his marching orders and script from the WH and was told to get his @ss out there and try to repair the damage. Has time for CNN, but not time to appear at Copen hoaxen. What a fraud.
Al gore is a pig, liar and crook. "You can't fix stupid" ...This bozo won't own up to anything. He's trying to salvage what's left of his house of cards. This guy would put Madoff to shame, except Al's still running the streets. Let's face, just about everything they do is about REDISTRIBUTION period. I am not wasting my time arguing with the very people who will profit by this.
By the way-Upper Midwest Slammed By Snow .. State Of Emergency In Wisconsin ...
Why do all U global warming deniers want 2 continue 2 burn fossil fuels instead of moving on to a more advanced way to power the Earth? I don't get that. Don't U want a clean, silent car & fresh air to breathe? You'd rather squander all the fossil fuels that took millions of years to make in a just a few hundred? Crazy! What will we use 2 make fertilizer to feed ourselves with without petroleum? Earth ain't making anymore. We should be saving every last drop of oil for things other than burning.
I'm all for clean, quite cars. What I'm not into is inefficient and expensive power, like solar and wind, regressive taxation and more government control of our lives.
I could give two craps less if we got rid of all our fossil fuel use. I have no vested interest. But I do have major problems with being forced to subsidize so called green energy, by giving huge government contracts and artificially inflating the price, meanwhile ignoring nuclear power. I call BS.
Coal Fired Power Plants and their mercury. Oil and it's poisoning our air and ground water... the increase in toxic chemicals put in gasoline and the rise in disease rates nation wide. I'd say you have a dog in the fight if you value your health, the health of those you love or a future free from choking pollution.
@Corporations8MyBaby Hear hear, I couldn't agree with you more, Corp8MyBaby! You said it so well about the health effects caused by continued, persistent exposure to fossil fuels. There's a warning right on gasoline pumps that I've seen, saying that gasoline is a carcinogen & we blissfully go on our merry way pumping gas in our cars then burning it & breathing in the exhaust fumes. I always said that science seems to take one step forward & two steps back. What a stupid fucked up species Man is!
@jojorider2 Problem is that fossil fuels R finite & hurt us & enviro. Coal abundant but very damaging. Oil cleaner but running out. We should be saving every last drop of oil for fertilizer to feed ourselves & for plastics & for jet fuel. Everything else regarding energy should go green. Earth reached peak oil production in early 1970s. We ARE running out! What we do then?
See documentary "A Crude Awakening: The Oil Crash".
So this isn't about whether or not the science is right. This is about getting rid of mankind's dependence on fossil fuels. You could care less if the scientist are lying ideologues, you'd believe them because you want them to be right. How disingenuous.
@jojorider2 I dont get U. Where did I say that I dont believe the science is right? It *IS* right. I already said I agree w/Al Gore & his answers given in this interview. He says clearly that the emails being cited hav been taken out of context. WTF is unclear there? The Right is making mountian out of molehill citing emails that wer opinions shared btw some scientists. Nvr has been proved that they manufctured data. Gore points out that they said mybe thy shouldn't hav incl some data. That all.
Gore also pointed out that the emails are over 10 years old. Do you believe him?
Gore could tell you that the emails were about making cookies and you'd buy it, because you hate fossil fuels and want to support anything that would get rid of them. Be honest, I'm not really that far off am I.
@jojorider2 "You hate fossil fuels and want to support anything that would get rid of them. Be honest, I'm not really that far off am I."
And what, you *LIKE* fossil fuels and want to support anything that would keep them? Why? WTF is so great about something that's killing us and the planet all around us? *YOU* be honest, you're somehow profiting from maintaining the status quo, right? It would hurt you in the wallet if you had to change business as usual. I'm not really that far off am I?
I never said I liked fossil fuels. I'm not into artificial regulations based on unproven science. I'm not into jumping on the bandwagon just because it supports my ideology. I'm a skeptical person by nature, while you would support anything that supports your beliefs regardless.
You've just exposed yourself as the person that I thought you were. Thank you.
@jojorider2 You're welcome. I too am skeptical & arrived at my conclusions after hearing & seeing the facts. Have you? I doubt it. You're the one that seems to be a Rush Limbaugh "Dittohead" sticking to the party line that global warming is still unproven. Funny, huh? I bet the fact that the north pole ice cap all of a sudden 40% is gone after it was the size of continental US for 3 million years proves nothing, right? It just happen to go away by itself w/out man's help, right? You're pathetic.
Millions of years ago all of the continents were combined to form Pangea, we had an Ice Age, and dinosaurs once roamed the Earth. Everything on Earth changes over time, how do you know this so-called warming isn't from that?
Another point, the polar ice caps on Mars were also melting at the same time ours were. Could that be the culprit of global warming instead of C02?
Third conjecture, our orbit has a wobble and we are due for a polar shift in 2012 (according to Einstein)
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@Kapan60 Warming of past due to: 1) Early Earth interior hotter back then cooling slowly over time. 2) More CO2 in atmosphere due 2 greater volcanic activity from more geologically active interior. 3) More asteroid impacts bec more of 'em around back then causing more heating.
Mars conjectured 2 hav developed as Earth w/oceans blue skies & possible life. Smaller planet core cooled quickly planet died.
Wobble is only 26000 yrs not millions plus has nothing to do with current global warming.
He defended the emails by saying they are old, and out of context, and by now, everybody has already agreed on it, so, we're having the treaty signed, even without congress, just ask Obama, he'll be there to sell out America and tax the people to death, meanwhile the frauds take 1200 Limos and 400 private planes to Copenhagen to set up the tax scheme. Google that! ha. LOL right at the end they say winter is still 2 weeks away, but theres all kinds of snow!! I love it! Laughing in your face!
I can see that your trolling but for those who care:
The debate isnt just about energy use, its about power sources.
Most of those that have their limos and jets also are pushing for renewable energy sources that will power their vehicles, bringing their carbon footprint far less then you or me with our vehicles yet doing nothing compared to them to lower nonrenewable energy usage.
If your helping to fund renewables, then your one of the better people, luckily the leaders are at least.
You don't know me. You have no idea what I think or why I came to my conclusions. I don't believe in conspiracies and I'm perfectly willing to change my mind if I feel it's warranted.
You should take your link and plaster your face on that caveman. I'm not the one trolling skeptics message boards trying to win the argument with dated information. I'm not the one trying to condescend to people simply because they looked at the data and came to a different conclusion. You're an ideologue.
Big Oil wrote the Copenhagen Treaty... its a win-win for big oil once the treaty is ratified.... Big Oil will have officially secured their oligarchy empire on ALL energy on the planet.... people like -Corporations8MyBaby- are blinded by fear to understand the economic side.
Al Gore is lying to you.... notice how he simply is laughing at the leaked emails and suggesting that people JUST LIKE YOU AND ME who are very concerned about them are 'climate deniers' who don't want to do anything for the environment.... Science is objectional and he's suggesting anybody who is objective is simply in denial... sorry folks.... he's lying to you, your family and friends... His tactics are called Junk Politics.
We need a whole new government. One who cares about the USA, the people and the constitution. F this one world government crap. They cannot even run things over here, what is it going to look like when they take over the world? God help us.
mojdfiv's stuff comes from a guy named Frederick Seitz who works for Exxon. Before that he worked for Big Tobacco. but these people will grasp at any claim. I am gonna keep saying it: Peer Review cannot be bought. It's fact. - now let's debate what to do about the facts.
Science is progressive, and builds constantly on new information as it is gathered. It was premature for Gore to cause a worldwide scare, but very well planned.
He lists some facts and lies about those facts. Man made carbon emissions are NOT the majority of emissions being leaked into the atmosphere. Is pollution a serious issue? yes. So is deforestation that ruins the planets ability to filter carbon dioxide and generate oxygen. Al Gore is a lying piece of shit career politician who is looking to benifit financially as well as expand his own bloated ego and feeling of self-importance. Its a sham and no one is focusing on real issues
So, "many" climate models show man made global warming is reversing a natural swing to declining temperatures? This means some models do not show this result. It would also indicate Algore has been able to accurately predict natural cycles and differentiate them from man made influences. My God, this man is so smart. I wouldn't expect any less from the man that invented the internet.
First of all, the global warming trend accounts for a fraction of a degree temperature increase a year. To give an example of using your heater in July is idiotic. It's equivalent to a smoker arguing that smoking if fine for your health because he has been smoking for 20 years and is in good health.
I wish CNN would get more specific about the climategate emails and HOW they were taken out of context, as Gore claims...he's so set on his ideology I wonder if he even looked at them.
This all comes down to is retraining the companies we work for, through yet ANOTHER bogus scam. Our companies are already hurting, and this clown known as Al, he's wanting to hit us again. Gore and his band of scam-scientists want to cash in on our hard earned money. We all know when a company is forced to pay for something, they cut their work force to pay for it.
Well, this is all good with Al. You see, his company will GAIN. Google his companies website. He's ready to cash in. Global HOAX!
AzBirdDog 2 months ago
al you are such an alarmist well i don't supose you can't make millions without putting up good show and by the way how come the ocean hasn't risen if the ice has melted at the poles
vmgqie 3 months ago
"Climategate" was disproved by even the Koch brothers.
Karpify 3 months ago
What a pathetic, shameless, sad man.
AllanSanches 6 months ago in playlist CLIMATEGATE FRAUD EXPOSED
Gore. Liar. Period.
boxwoodgreen 8 months ago
I have been using the world's best and most up to date supercomputer to forecast what the climate will do in the next decades. The conclusion is that the climate will cool abruptly with winters being very harsh. Measures must be taken now to prepare for the coming cold. Human intelligence is a wonderful thing. Why don't you try using it to end the warming scam?
david222444 9 months ago
So CO2 causes climate change? Studies show that is not a relationship. If anything atmospheric CO2 is influenced by temperature levels and not the opposite.
Klinkerklunk 1 year ago
@Klinkerklunk And whats more, is that ice core samples showed high levels of co2 back millions of years ago.
The scientists back then said that during that time, everything was bigger and we all know that tree's, plants, they all need co2.
The tree's were bigger, the animals were bigger and even the insects were bigger with draggonflies being the size of hawks!
Gore will go down as biggest scam artist of the century.
It's already taking place. More than 30,000 scientists will prove this.
AzBirdDog 2 months ago
also who waxed your eyebrows mr gore?
rigatony019 1 year ago
3% of the "global warming pollution" as dr gore calls it is man made....
rigatony019 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Al Gore is proof there is no God.
hotfudgemoney 1 year ago
just look in his eyes
lying piece of shit
oximoronTV 1 year ago 3
funny im yet to see any up trend since 2001 , any one seen any ?, after all it has been 9 yrs.
Also anyone actually seen any real sea level change. Sureley ther is a beach dweller somewhere ?? Cummon surely there is a single person living on a beach ...? isnt there ?
klnine 1 year ago
Climategate
Mann:
"..The key thing is making sure the series are vertically aligned in a reasonable
way. I had been using the entire 20th century, but in the case of Keith's,
we need to align the first half of the 20th century w/ the corresponding mean
values of the other series, due to the late 20th century decline."
ww w. eastangliaemails. com/emails. php?eid=136&filename=938018124 . txt
Thisawareness 1 year ago
The most lies I have ever heard in 5 mins, Gore you are a liar extraordinaire.
The biggest greenhouse gas is cloud... water vapour, responsible for 98% of all global warming... he seems to have forgotten that, plus the story that followed his interview, fuckin ICE EVERYWHERE, so where is your warming now Gore
Fucking lying bastard.
pigglesnitch 1 year ago
I read many of the emails. There is nothing in climategate. Sorry rednecks
Seano71 1 year ago
@Seano71 me too, now read them in plain english !
klnine 1 year ago
If "environmentalist political and business elite" who push the agenda, were really interested in saving the planet, those that comply and recycle, etc etc should be rewarded for contributing not penalised for compliance through new taxes. That is so counterproductive! Unless you are a CEO or Exec. of a carbon tax credits or on the Chicago carbon exchange etc. It is firstly a money making machine, and secondly an arm of the Agenda 21, UN ultimate depopulation program.
sinclair61 2 years ago
Climategate U-turn as scientist at centre of row admits: There has been no global warming since 1995
Data for vital 'hockey stick graph' has gone missing
There has been no global warming since 1995
Warming periods have happened before - but NOT due to man-made changes.
There comes a time when it's decent and proper to admit a shameful deception has taken place. You Howard Dean and ManBearPig are wrong.
...and so the scam of AGW begins to unravel!
hellotommy 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Global Warming is a pseudo-science like they had in the Soviet Union
The head of the Global warming Cult is a flake
The chief quack of the quacks at the IPCC is a railroad conductor
The head of the CUEI is an economist with ties to the IMF
The GW magical cure does not address the #1 factor for environmental degradation, wildlife declines, & GHG production
Yeah Global Warming is a pseudo-science
1984 Choo Choo!
THX 1138
Thisawareness 2 years ago
Chemtrails???
vj198 2 years ago
The largest single source of CO2 is man? That's just utter bullshit. A volcano could burb up more methane than the total output of all our industry for a decade tomorrow, and the world would be no worse for the wear than it was during the medieval warming period (the period that Gore omits from his big graph in his movie). Fact is, the Sun's output is a far greater factor than man's CO2 output. That's why every inner planet, not just the Earth, is also rising in temperature.
HeavyMechanics 2 years ago
@HeavyMechanics
1. Human activities release >130 times the amount of CO2 than volcanoes.
Ref: ht tp://volcanoes.usgs.g ov/hazards/gas/index.php
2. Solar forcing has been waning since 1985, while global temps have continued to rise
Ref: ht tp://w ww.warwickhughes.c om/agri/lockwood2007.pdf
3. Regarding the other planets:
w ww.youtube.c om/user/greenman3610#p/c/029130BFDC78FA33/3/BSXgiml5UwM
(remove spaces from all links)
There are a lot of lies out there from the deniers. You got taken in.
cristop5 2 years ago
WOW...... put the prick in jail.
TheKickerboy99 2 years ago
Liar, Liar, Pants on fire!
heith123 2 years ago
Lovely "global warming" snow blizzard edning, hahaha! :D
POCEHE 2 years ago
"The north polar cap is disappearing right now"!!!
He has really gone over the top now, they Ice caps are growing, but he is still sticking to the lie. Sea level rises? Where is it rising, his bath tub?
sh0rty42 2 years ago
go to arctic pl0x
loloioi 2 years ago
@sh0rty42
1. The Arctic ice cap is shrinking:
/watch?v=r2RGQfmLl4E
also: ht tp://nsidc.o rg/arcticseaicenews/ (remove spaces)
2. Mean global sea level has risen about 50mm since 1993:
ht tp://sealevel.colorado.e du/ (remove spaces)
There are a lot of lies put out by deniers. For some reason they are uncritically accepted by millions.
cristop5 2 years ago
I think you are the one taken in, but you are entitled to your opinion. I'm talking about an eruption like Krakatoa, not the output levels talked about in that study. Personally, I'll take the opinion of climatologists that don't have conflicts of interest like the IPCC.
HeavyMechanics 2 years ago
@HeavyMechanics
In what way was I taken in? All my claims were backed up. Yours weren't.
cristop5 2 years ago 2
it's not my job to do research and post it here. you can do your own research. just because something is posted in a video does not mean it is truth.
HeavyMechanics 2 years ago
Plus, CO2 is NOT a pollutant.
HeavyMechanics 2 years ago
@HeavyMechanics
Water is not a pollutant, but you can drown in it.
cristop5 2 years ago
and what lies, specifically are you referring to? think about why this label "climate deniers" is part of the drumbeat of the globalist's agenda. look i am not saying we don't need to clean up industrial waste and pollutants, far from it. i just think the global warming agenda has been co-opted by elitists and globalists for purposes of profit and hegemony, and cap and trade and carbon taxes are absolutely the wrong way to go about it.
HeavyMechanics 2 years ago
cristop5 2 years ago
Climatologists, the scientists you would call "deniers" are not saying "the sun explains recent warming". What certain climatologists are saying is that the Sun, and it's radiation interacting with the toposphere, is the primary driver of climate. They are also not saying CO2 does not affect the earth's "energy balance". All climatologists agree that CO2 levels are in direct correlation with global temperature, the point of contention is to what extreme this is true. The equation isn't simple.
HeavyMechanics 2 years ago
@HeavyMechanics. Surprisingly we may be on the same page. The "dissent" if you can all it that among working climatologists is about the mechanics of climate systems, and the magnitude of warming predicted by the models. 'Skeptics' like Pat Michaels, Roy Spencer & John Christy agree that CO2 has an effect, but they contest how big that is. I have yet to see them account for the warming that's occurred over the last 40yrs.
Sadly the lay denier community embrace and parrot the lies I listed.
cristop5 2 years ago
I was reading a bit into the Sun aspect more, because, heck, what do I know... and it seems the Sun is getting hotter, but very slowly over billions of years. It wouldn't explain the temperature rise over the last decades. But in all honesty the temperature rise over the last 40 years does not seem extreme at all compared to the MWP, and most of it occurred before our biggest industrial output. The ice cap shrunk back during that time as well.
HeavyMechanics 2 years ago
HeavyMechanics. Here are a few more refs on the sun:
1. ww w.mps.mpg.d e/dokumente/publikationen/solanki/c153.pdf (this concludes the warming since 1975 cannot be due to the sun)
2. rspa.royalsocietypublishing.o rg/content/464/2094/1367.abstract (abstract only. this notes that solar forcing has declined over the last 20yrs while temps have risen)
3. ww w.acrim.c om/Reference Files/Sun & Global Warming_GRL_2006.pdf (note Fig. 2 and the divergence of temps and solar forcing in the 20th century.
cristop5 2 years ago
cont'd
4.w ww.warwickhughes.c om/agri/lockwood2007.pdf (this shows solar forcing, whichever way you measure it has declined since 1985 while temps have risen)
Despite what deniers would have you think, climatologists are well aware of the sun's importance in driving temperatures. Before the industrial revolution it was the main driver. The problem is that the sun alone cannot explain recent temperature rises. Especially those that have occurred since the late 20th century.
cristop5 2 years ago
@HeavyMechanics
Here's a recent paper on the MWP. w ww.meteo.psu.e du/~mann/shared/articles/MannetalScience09.pdf
It finds that while temps were warmer in some places such as Greenland, in other regions at that time it was far cooler.
BTW for all my references you need to remove the blank spaces. If you can't bring any of them up, let me know & I will re-post.
cristop5 2 years ago
I think you may be right about some points, but I think we must do something about global warming now. If some kind of carbon tax is not the solution, then what is? We must stop producing CO2, and I think that a tax, just enough to make renewables competitive, would be very effective at achieving this.
kellygiz 2 years ago
Very timely blizzard segment at the end...
Hmmm
bigolbub 2 years ago
Follow the money...
WOWZhual 2 years ago
Is Gore's mouth moving? Then I guess he is lying.
Rosenkreuzer120 2 years ago
more lies, and more hide the decline, more suited arguements and labling those who look at facts 'climate deniers' its never open, shoving people out of hte way and shutting off their mikes when they ask Gore questions is so propaganda is idiotic. Does the sun cause the heat, duh? can polar bears swim, duh? Co2=pollution, then shut up Gore and stop polluting!
M4GW 2 years ago
as time passes and this hoax becomes very well known. gore, with gray hair, will be looked at as one of the most fucked up crooks of maybe all time.
logictoo 2 years ago 2
the hacker let go not only emails but, documents with info about the software that blowjobs friends at the cru used. and the software is corrupt. blowjobs friends say "the science", "the science behind", "the science". hay blowjob ! the softwaer is fucked. so the so called science is fucked! and the cru knows this and so do you blowjob.
logictoo 2 years ago 2
the news dude and chick are asking questions so "blowjob" can spew his "vomit comit".
logictoo 2 years ago 2
let him dance "the mussolini swing". if you catch my drift?
logictoo 2 years ago 3
gore knows the jig is up. he's a fuckin blowjob.
logictoo 2 years ago 2
What the hell, where did Al gore get his Atmospheric/meteorologist degree from? You cant just learn this shit from layman's view. He is the biggest scammer, he actually claimed that the icecaps will be gone in 5 years at copenhagen. Would like to see that.
Zoklor 2 years ago
how can it be that the temareturen has increased on other planets, relative to the sun ? does our CO2 emissions affect the other planets too ? I doubt it...
oscarodorico 2 years ago
Look, people who actually care about climate change don't care about "Climategate" whatever that is. I care about science and facts so I don't pay attention to any of this nonsense and no one else should either. I'm going to go back to reading my environmental science textbooks which actually contain facts.
Criminal08 2 years ago
Yeah , I'm sure 90 tons of pollution a day will have no affect on the earth.
WE couldn't possible be responsible for affecting the climate.
WE should just ignore Al Gore and take our chances! The worst thing that could happen is your children end up with a shit hole to live in!
Why would we want to make any sacrifices to ensure that our children have a good future?
EFISHANT 2 years ago
You don't get it, do you?
n1Erik90 2 years ago
Great point. I don't see why people are trying to fight against working towards a greener planet....oh wait....money.
cht232323 2 years ago
huge money behind global warming? Are you joking?
Where do you think there is more money, in proving global warming wrong or proving it right?
As you guys always say, follow the money.
The money involved in scientific research is pennies compared to big Oil Profits. And its not like scientists get funding depending on the outcome of their research. Unless theyre on like Exxons payroll, they get paid by the government just for doing research, not for coming to specific conclusions.
kekemankek 2 years ago 4
Comment removed
peterukk 2 years ago
Only good thing about this vid...Kiran Chetry was in it.
Traveler2112 2 years ago
global warming has made al gore a very wealthy man.
I now doubt the whole global warming scam. It's all about money and control and power.
merrimac291 2 years ago 9
Al Gore getting rich, promoting a Carbon Credit Tax Scam invented by the ex CEO of ENRON, Kenneth Lay.....
Meanwhile libs and greenies are still licking his balls....LOL, this is too much
Libs and Greenies may go down in history as the Biggest Suckers the World has Ever Known
ShiekYerbooty 2 years ago 20
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Global Warming Denialists Ignoring Mountains of Evidence may go down in history as the Biggest Suckers the World has Ever Known.
Hey, this namecalling game is pretty fun, I see why you guys are all doing it.
kekemankek 2 years ago
Mountains of evidence......I'm sure you believed the " scientists " when they were telling Americans that smoking cigarettes was good and relaxing....it's amazing what conclusions well paid scientists can come up with
maybe you should check into who stands to gain from " climate change " legislation, and who has been funding " climate science "......sucker
ENRON invented the Carbon Credit Scam for fecks sake
ShiekYerbooty 2 years ago 15
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@SkiekYerbooty
So wait. You're saying "Fake science said tobacco wasn't harmful, THEREFORE real science is wrong".
I don't quite get the logic there.
greyfalcon. net/ tobacco
greyfalcon. net/ denial
greyflcn 2 years ago
Honestly, there are lots of parallels you can draw between AGW and the health effects of tobacco and the public opinion revolving those, but I found your take on it baffling, as I would draw quite the opposite conclusions. Big Oil (especially Exxon) are using exactly the same propaganda-like tactics spreading disinformation as Big Tobacco used to alter public opinion and instill confusion even when there was strong scientific evidence linking smoking with cancer. And sadly, you're all buying it.
kekemankek 2 years ago 2
You've got to be kidding me right ? EXXON just cash in on 3 billion dollars worth of subsidies to search for Natural Gas in New Guinea...part of the " green " plan. They also spent more than 120 billion dollars of their money and yours ( more subsidies) in the last decade preparing for these new regulations by getting cleaner. They are ready and waiting ....
EXXON does not stand alone in a vaccum, EXXON's major shareholders are also major shareholders in every other Global Corporate Superpower
ShiekYerbooty 2 years ago
@ShiekYerbooty
Well, even I agree that offsets are a bad idea.
Much rather prefer either a direct tax on the wholesale of fossil fuels, or auctioned permits for large industries.
Avoid the whole speculative thing entirely.
greyflcn 2 years ago
EXXON, Royal Dutch Shell, British Petroleum were all funding Climate Science.......some of the intercepted e-mails even detail scientists begging for more money from EXXON and others soliciting from Royal Dutch Shell
These are not companies that stand alone....their shareholders are also invested in The Banking Cartel that runs that IMF and Central Banks, they are also invested Carbon Markets and Trading Schemes
these people have their hands in everything and you are playing right into them
ShiekYerbooty 2 years ago
Mountains of evidence? Have you read the e-mails from the IPCCC?
If the evidence was correct there would be no need to "trick" the data or avoid peer review. The evidence would speak for itself.
Newton, Darwin, Einstein (just to name a few) dealt with plently of skepticism and stood the test of time. These guys are too busy attempting to avoid any discussion about the e-mails and simply attack the skeptics instead of providing convincing evidence.
Kapan60 2 years ago 3
Uh, have you even researched what the emails mean in context before jumping to conclusions?
"Trick" does not mean what you think it means in scientific literature
Please everyone, I know you hate Al Gore and all that and its fun jumping to conclusions with emails taken out of context, but if you're gonna get opinionated about this, atleast take some time to research the emails in context and see if they really ARE incriminating or if thats just more bullshit from skeptics
/watch?v=7nnVQ2fROOg
kekemankek 2 years ago
I have a pretty extensive background in science and "trick" is not a word ever used in scientific literature. I find it very disturbing how the climate "change" movement has become so entwined with politicians and corporations that are using the enviromental movement as an excuse to profit from it.
As for taking things out of context. That's just a lame talking point Al Gore & Friends use to avoid the debate. Attack the attacker and avoid proving them wrong because they can't.
Kapan60 2 years ago 3
How nice, my earlier comment got 17 thumbs down in 12 hours in a video with very little views, a bot no doubt. You guys are starting to resemble creationists more and more with your tactics. Or perhaps it was some oil company worker whose job it is to take down comments like mine.
kekemankek 2 years ago
Paranoid?
Kapan60 2 years ago
People need to remember that Al Gore is also a religious man, he belives the earth is comeing to an end, the sky is falling in, he belives man can walk on water, a stick can turn into a snake, that man can come back from the dead, he bleives in gods, that man can part water, of a virgin birth. HE IS ONE NUT CASE
shelby11211 2 years ago 7
Come on people, think, read. Innovate.
humanisall 2 years ago 3
God, this chick is gorgeous.
andyKCIUK 2 years ago
Best. Segue. Ever. [4:50]
Reasonjester 2 years ago
@MisterThomasPaine
Well even if we're talking cellulosic, like hemp.
It still doesn't make much difference.
More power to you if you can do something on an extremely small scale.
But on a large scale it just doesn't make any sense.
greyfalcon. net/ ethanol.png
All plants just don't make the cut, since they are all limited by photosynthesis.
Sugar cane for instance, comparable to hemp, only gets a 0.13% efficiency conversion ratio.
greyfalcon. net/ sugarsolar
greyflcn 2 years ago
@MisterThomasPaine
Well Hemp may be a great substitute for trees and cotton.
But the problem when it comes to energy, ALL photosynthesis is horribly inefficient.
For instance, with an area a third the size we currently have devoted to corn ethanol production.
Solar thermal steam turbines could provide enough electricity to run the entire country, 24/7, all year.
greyflcn 2 years ago
I never thought I could feel this much animosity towards another human being!...grrrrrrrr......If only we could believe that he is just a fool, unfortunately he knows EXACTLY the lies he is telling
me243 2 years ago
The Religion of climate change with Gore as Pope and The science as Religion and the "Deniers" as Heretics
Man made global warming is Hoax
United we stand divided we fall
Much love and awareness to all
bartingman 2 years ago
It takes 10,000ppm before people would start to feel dizzy. 600ppm is nothing. Compared to the past some might say Earth is CO2 impoverished. Look back through history at some of earth's previous periods when animals and forest thrived in CO2 levels in the 1500-4000ppm. How could the largest animals that ever lived live in that much CO2? Jurassic Period-1800ppm, Cambrian Period-7000ppm.
Dont take my word research it yourself.
Traveler2112 2 years ago
During the late Ordovician Period ICE AGE CO2 levels were 4400ppm. 11 times what they are today. It was very cold. Not hot. Don't take my word. Look it up.
No man made CO2 back then either.488million years ago, How can it be? Can there be something else affecting climate other than CO2? How about that big, hot burning bulb that beats down on us? I think the heat is about over and before this century is over it is going to start getting cold.
Traveler2112 2 years ago
This is do the the ice cover(lack of vegetation) and volcanism. Plants could survive as the temperature rose because of the high C02 levels rose. This gave plants the opportunity to absorb the additional carbon to the relative levels it is today. Remember.. climate is not just one figure but a system, balances of variables.
a4igeek 2 years ago
Comment removed
Traveler2112 2 years ago
@Traveler2112
Ordovician period eh?
Sounds like I have just the video for you.
greyfalcon. net/ climate2
The way it can be, is that the climate is more complex than 1 variable at a time.
greyflcn 2 years ago
I absolutely agree climate is more complex. Which is why I say they just do not have enough of the variables of climate to justify singling out that CO2 (manmade on top of that) is the culprit. It just happens to be the one that they can make the most profit off of. Why don't they go after water vapor it encapsulates CO2 and all other GHG's combined. Why? Because they can't make money off evaporation.
Traveler2112 2 years ago
@Traveler2112
Because the amount of watervapor in the troposphere is regulated by it's temperature sensitivity.
Effectively making it capable of magnifying other tropospheric temperature changes.
But it can't drive tropospheric warming or cooling by itself.
tinyurl (dot) com/ydgbly3
Also, we know there's been a directly observable increasing greenhouse effect, specifically in the wavelengths we'd associate with CO2 and CH4
greyfalcon. net/ greenhouse
greyflcn 2 years ago
I cannot stand it when he uses the word "Climate Deniers". Such a nasty catchphrase. They are not denying that Climate is changing, has changed or will change. They are denying that CO2 is the culprit. You know CO2 just happens to be the one that they can eventually make the most profit off of. Water vapor is the single greatest GHG. It is more than all the others combined. How to get ppl on board Mr Gore. Stand up at the Copen. Summit and demand that all of this be accomplished NON PROFIT!
Traveler2112 2 years ago
what a moron. IDIOTS4OBAMA COM
IdiotsForObamaCom 2 years ago
Al Gore is a total fuckhead.
azjeff1971 2 years ago
How is taxing us and giving it out to other countries going to save us if we have already reached critical mass?
raab28 2 years ago
I guess you don't understand science. The Scientific method is not a matter of opinion. Man has taken the amount of C02 from 275 to 390. Science has reported on what that does. To "not believe" peer reviewed papers is to be in opposition to the scientific method itself. That being true, your opinions of science don't matter. If you were color blind, I wouldn't ask you your opinion of the beauty of a sunset. Learn what the scientific method is all about.
Corporations8MyBaby 2 years ago
I think I should scream bloody murder next time I hear mention of the word "peer review" in regards to climate science. Peer review is a rigged game. Haven't the emails made that much clear?
I'm so fucking sick of people like you. You have the nerve to condescend to people about science, when all you have in your back pocket is a few talking points you plucked from some liberal message board.
These scientists did not practice the scientific method. That much is plain.
jojorider2 2 years ago
You don't understand or apparently believe in the scientific method. Do you have cell phone? A computer? All the physics were arrived at by the method. You cannot "rig" peer review. That proves you don't know what peer review really is. That means we can't discuss facts because you don't understand them. Again, we lose your valuable civic voice in a black closet of ignorance. Please learn what peer review is.
Corporations8MyBaby 2 years ago
I understand the scientific method far better than you my friend and this isn't the first time that the peer review process has been in question regarding this science. These emails just confirm what was already suspected.
Better get off your high horse. You're not nearly as smart as you think you are. You're just another ideologue.
jojorider2 2 years ago
@jojorider2
Actually, if you followed up the result of that supposed "suppressed" paper. It made it's way into the IPCC report anyways.
And as for Balinunas & Soon 2003, that's evidence that a small journal can let a REALLY idiotic paper slip through it's weak peer review process.
(Where they question in these emails if Climate Review is actually up to the task of a legitimate peer review process, if it can drop the ball on something so obviously flawed)
greyfalcon. net/ baliunas
greyflcn 2 years ago
I wasn't talking about Balinunas & Soon. I've read the emails. Have you?
jojorider2 2 years ago
@jojorider2
So were you talking about the paper published in Energy & Environment?
That's a non-reviewed social science journal, which which doesn't even do spellcheck.
Much less scientific review.
And besides which, despite all that, those two papers were still referenced by the IPCC report.
watch?v=5AyjLTaP0i0
greyflcn 2 years ago
LOL, luv the end, huge early winter blizzard, hahaha, were has the warming gone?
CaptainJack5parrow 2 years ago
i wanna slap him on his forhead with a wet dirty sock
fazadeset 2 years ago
This subject should be split into two major problems.
1. Conservative versus Progressive-thinking was : Some want to keep on going the same direction and some want to change course. (usually an own-interest-story)
2. Sceptics and Buyers now do - or do not believe what the Main Media sells them.
My first concern is now how to figure out which news-source is reliable and to be prepared mentally to a fading democracy. Later we can decide which course to sail.
This is about Truth, no indivs
Paul19681225 2 years ago
hahaahaaha the ending was the best BLIZZARD RECORD BREAKING SNOW
LMAO
fazadeset 2 years ago
at the beggining gore asserts that people opposed to his plan do not want to do anything about pollution problems. WRONG! what we do not want is a tax on our very breathing. i think everyone agrees that soot and pollution is a bad thing not only for the enviroment, but for us as well. taxing every man women and child and continuing down the path we are treading is NOT solving the problems we have created, we have the technology of solar and wind powerbut are still drilling for oil.goreismoot
burnpoi86 2 years ago
So you want to do something about pollution right?
Corporations8MyBaby 2 years ago
Yes. Real pollution. Not the stuff you breath out or fart out your rear. Stuff like sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide.
I want clean air, but people like you don't want us to breathe.
jojorider2 2 years ago
Why would you write that last sentence? What in anything I have said would lead you to such an outrageous statement? I just want all of us to know what SCIENCE is. It's not fake-able on that scale. The facts are in. People try to poke holes in the science but no go. It's been decades. We can certainly discuss what to do about the facts so we assure clean air and water, but to pretend that science can be faked to match your emotions removes your valuable mind from the conversation.
Corporations8MyBaby 2 years ago
And which facts are these?
jojorider2 2 years ago
Yes absolutely, pollution is definitely a problem in our society, but the question is whether it pertains to global warming on a reasonable scale or not, a question which Mr. Gore has skillfully avoided answering. And I fail to see how the use of more nuclear energy is a good idea, especially in light of our ongoing efforts to keep Iran and other up and coming economy's from using it.
burnpoi86 2 years ago
@petorkins
Well that's easy, because natural absorption is slightly larger than natural emission. Pretty much in balance.
Manmade actions tip that balance
greyfalcon. net/ carbon2
And we know it's fossil carbon given it's specific isotopes.
greyfalcon. net/ c14
greyflcn 2 years ago
If that were true, then CO2 would always remain at constant levels. We wouldn't see the wild fluctuations that we do.
jojorider2 2 years ago
@jojorider2
Not necessarily, it's been true for quite some time. However the primary thing that changes that is changes in earth's orbit relative to the sun. (And about an 800 year lag, caused by the time it takes to change the temperature of the bottom of the ocean)
greyfalcon. net/ climate2
Catch being, changes in earth's orbit takes many tens of thousands of years.
And the earliest evidence of significant human civilizations only goes back 1 set of ten thousand years.
greyflcn 2 years ago
Had a great comeback but my daughter goosed the page. Suffice it to say, I think we have a limited understanding of carbon sinks to make any definitive statement on equilibrium.
jojorider2 2 years ago
I had to read his book in college. Such BS! This is coming from the man that says he invented the internet? Copenhagen Treaty is the start of more loss of liberty and taxation for the Elites benefit. Wake Up!
AwakingTV 2 years ago 3
Unfortunately Al Gore I have not adjusted enough sodium fluoride mercury in flu shots and aspartame
I will start believing in you when I start using these products, in the form of a question what is a bold faced lie
CANZEENSO 2 years ago
The level of paranoia and downright hate in the denier community is nuts.
C'mon folks, the cause of the warming cannot be proven 100%, however, its a reality. The prevailing theory is that burning shit (and as a species we burn a LOT of shit) is causing it.
What I see from the other side is a religious fervor, which, like religion is based on nonsense. When confronted with two theories, one supported by NASA vs one supported by some bozos who scream "conspiracy" ad nauseum, NASA wins.
Bunnicula71 2 years ago
He just ignores the questions and says what he wants. There was a question, 'what percent of CO2 comes from man', NOT ''what is your opinion on what percent global warming is due to man'. Annual CO2 input from man is somewhere around 3%. The atmosphere is also around .038% CO2. Gore just ignored the question (as usual).
dziprick 2 years ago 2
The highest % of greenhouse gases are man made?
WTF
Just how much of the "Greenhouse Effect" is caused by human activity?
It is about 0.28%
That's almost as good as Gore saying on Leno that 2 km below the earth it is millions of degrees
SaveOurSovereignty3 2 years ago 3
What a lying sack of shit
SaveOurSovereignty3 2 years ago 2
The majority of CO2 in the atmosphere is manmade? In October 2000, the Department of Energy estimated that about 3 percent of the CO2 in the atmosphere was caused by man.
ufbret 2 years ago
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA...humans are the problem. How convenient that the EPA deems CO2 a pollutant right as the Copenhagen Summit commences. Al Gore is a liar and a fraud. I hope once all is said and done that he get put in jail.
achalmers 2 years ago
Eliminating the use of fossil fuels and evolution of technology is fantastic.
The government establishment machine corporations, all control the patents and suppress advancement of technologies by design.
Creating and taxing the masses will do nothing to perpetuate the advancement of technology.
The revolution will be a liberating time and experience for the ages.
We have the numbers; hopefully America still has the will to be great again!
Semper Fi
danieljdeluca 2 years ago 3
THIS MAN IS A PHONY!
SmashedBobNoPants 2 years ago
Didn't Al Gore just meet with Obama? He got his marching orders and script from the WH and was told to get his @ss out there and try to repair the damage. Has time for CNN, but not time to appear at Copen hoaxen. What a fraud.
marshhenga 2 years ago
Al gore is a pig, liar and crook. "You can't fix stupid" ...This bozo won't own up to anything. He's trying to salvage what's left of his house of cards. This guy would put Madoff to shame, except Al's still running the streets. Let's face, just about everything they do is about REDISTRIBUTION period. I am not wasting my time arguing with the very people who will profit by this.
By the way-Upper Midwest Slammed By Snow .. State Of Emergency In Wisconsin ...
dkkght46 2 years ago
Why do all U global warming deniers want 2 continue 2 burn fossil fuels instead of moving on to a more advanced way to power the Earth? I don't get that. Don't U want a clean, silent car & fresh air to breathe? You'd rather squander all the fossil fuels that took millions of years to make in a just a few hundred? Crazy! What will we use 2 make fertilizer to feed ourselves with without petroleum? Earth ain't making anymore. We should be saving every last drop of oil for things other than burning.
JixMa 2 years ago
I'm all for clean, quite cars. What I'm not into is inefficient and expensive power, like solar and wind, regressive taxation and more government control of our lives.
I could give two craps less if we got rid of all our fossil fuel use. I have no vested interest. But I do have major problems with being forced to subsidize so called green energy, by giving huge government contracts and artificially inflating the price, meanwhile ignoring nuclear power. I call BS.
jojorider2 2 years ago
Coal Fired Power Plants and their mercury. Oil and it's poisoning our air and ground water... the increase in toxic chemicals put in gasoline and the rise in disease rates nation wide. I'd say you have a dog in the fight if you value your health, the health of those you love or a future free from choking pollution.
Corporations8MyBaby 2 years ago 3
@Corporations8MyBaby Hear hear, I couldn't agree with you more, Corp8MyBaby! You said it so well about the health effects caused by continued, persistent exposure to fossil fuels. There's a warning right on gasoline pumps that I've seen, saying that gasoline is a carcinogen & we blissfully go on our merry way pumping gas in our cars then burning it & breathing in the exhaust fumes. I always said that science seems to take one step forward & two steps back. What a stupid fucked up species Man is!
JixMa 2 years ago
@jojorider2 Problem is that fossil fuels R finite & hurt us & enviro. Coal abundant but very damaging. Oil cleaner but running out. We should be saving every last drop of oil for fertilizer to feed ourselves & for plastics & for jet fuel. Everything else regarding energy should go green. Earth reached peak oil production in early 1970s. We ARE running out! What we do then?
See documentary "A Crude Awakening: The Oil Crash".
Trailer: watch?v=Or-TyPACK-g
Whole movie 9 parts: watch?v=6z9T5XPrDvg
JixMa 2 years ago
So this isn't about whether or not the science is right. This is about getting rid of mankind's dependence on fossil fuels. You could care less if the scientist are lying ideologues, you'd believe them because you want them to be right. How disingenuous.
jojorider2 2 years ago
@jojorider2 I dont get U. Where did I say that I dont believe the science is right? It *IS* right. I already said I agree w/Al Gore & his answers given in this interview. He says clearly that the emails being cited hav been taken out of context. WTF is unclear there? The Right is making mountian out of molehill citing emails that wer opinions shared btw some scientists. Nvr has been proved that they manufctured data. Gore points out that they said mybe thy shouldn't hav incl some data. That all.
JixMa 2 years ago
Gore also pointed out that the emails are over 10 years old. Do you believe him?
Gore could tell you that the emails were about making cookies and you'd buy it, because you hate fossil fuels and want to support anything that would get rid of them. Be honest, I'm not really that far off am I.
jojorider2 2 years ago
@jojorider2 "You hate fossil fuels and want to support anything that would get rid of them. Be honest, I'm not really that far off am I."
And what, you *LIKE* fossil fuels and want to support anything that would keep them? Why? WTF is so great about something that's killing us and the planet all around us? *YOU* be honest, you're somehow profiting from maintaining the status quo, right? It would hurt you in the wallet if you had to change business as usual. I'm not really that far off am I?
JixMa 2 years ago
I never said I liked fossil fuels. I'm not into artificial regulations based on unproven science. I'm not into jumping on the bandwagon just because it supports my ideology. I'm a skeptical person by nature, while you would support anything that supports your beliefs regardless.
You've just exposed yourself as the person that I thought you were. Thank you.
jojorider2 2 years ago
@jojorider2 You're welcome. I too am skeptical & arrived at my conclusions after hearing & seeing the facts. Have you? I doubt it. You're the one that seems to be a Rush Limbaugh "Dittohead" sticking to the party line that global warming is still unproven. Funny, huh? I bet the fact that the north pole ice cap all of a sudden 40% is gone after it was the size of continental US for 3 million years proves nothing, right? It just happen to go away by itself w/out man's help, right? You're pathetic.
JixMa 2 years ago
Millions of years ago all of the continents were combined to form Pangea, we had an Ice Age, and dinosaurs once roamed the Earth. Everything on Earth changes over time, how do you know this so-called warming isn't from that?
Another point, the polar ice caps on Mars were also melting at the same time ours were. Could that be the culprit of global warming instead of C02?
Third conjecture, our orbit has a wobble and we are due for a polar shift in 2012 (according to Einstein)
Kapan60 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@Kapan60 Warming of past due to: 1) Early Earth interior hotter back then cooling slowly over time. 2) More CO2 in atmosphere due 2 greater volcanic activity from more geologically active interior. 3) More asteroid impacts bec more of 'em around back then causing more heating.
Mars conjectured 2 hav developed as Earth w/oceans blue skies & possible life. Smaller planet core cooled quickly planet died.
Wobble is only 26000 yrs not millions plus has nothing to do with current global warming.
JixMa 2 years ago
He defended the emails by saying they are old, and out of context, and by now, everybody has already agreed on it, so, we're having the treaty signed, even without congress, just ask Obama, he'll be there to sell out America and tax the people to death, meanwhile the frauds take 1200 Limos and 400 private planes to Copenhagen to set up the tax scheme. Google that! ha. LOL right at the end they say winter is still 2 weeks away, but theres all kinds of snow!! I love it! Laughing in your face!
wikavideos 2 years ago
I can see that your trolling but for those who care:
The debate isnt just about energy use, its about power sources.
Most of those that have their limos and jets also are pushing for renewable energy sources that will power their vehicles, bringing their carbon footprint far less then you or me with our vehicles yet doing nothing compared to them to lower nonrenewable energy usage.
If your helping to fund renewables, then your one of the better people, luckily the leaders are at least.
waltermh111 2 years ago
Bullshit. They're buying their indulgences, while idiots, like yourself, prop them up.
jojorider2 2 years ago
@jojorider2
Yeah, why should I trouble you with facts, when no amount of them seems like it'd be capable of changing your mind?
greyfalcon. net/ ideology.png
You KNOW it's a big conspiracy, THEREFORE anything saying otherwise is a lie.
Is that about right?
_
That sort of logic works with a variety of topics:
Aliens, 9/11, CIA, or the Illuminati.
greyflcn 2 years ago 4
@greyflcn
"w w w(.)greyfalcon(.)net/ ideology.png"
I just checked that! Great cartoon! I take it that it's one of yours and you're the cartoonist. Thanks, greyflcn. I saving it as a "keeper".
JixMa 2 years ago
You don't know me. You have no idea what I think or why I came to my conclusions. I don't believe in conspiracies and I'm perfectly willing to change my mind if I feel it's warranted.
You should take your link and plaster your face on that caveman. I'm not the one trolling skeptics message boards trying to win the argument with dated information. I'm not the one trying to condescend to people simply because they looked at the data and came to a different conclusion. You're an ideologue.
jojorider2 2 years ago
Al Gore is the Anti-Christ if there ever was one! BOZO = AL GORE
America - take back your country, the revolution is about to happen.
Republicans & Democrats are responsible for the mess of the economy.
Lies, deceit and business as usual, until we say enough is enough well continue to be enslaved.
Peaceful revolution, remember what Gandhi did for India.
Semper FI
danieljdeluca 2 years ago
global warming is manbearpig.
super cereal
:P
iTellYouNoLie 2 years ago
south park right? i watched that too
chenchiheshang 2 years ago
Thanks for sharing - I just could not get through the video because of the id10T spewing forth all that CO2
Alderon714 2 years ago
Big Oil wrote the Copenhagen Treaty... its a win-win for big oil once the treaty is ratified.... Big Oil will have officially secured their oligarchy empire on ALL energy on the planet.... people like -Corporations8MyBaby- are blinded by fear to understand the economic side.
acidhead43 2 years ago
Al Gore is lying to you.... notice how he simply is laughing at the leaked emails and suggesting that people JUST LIKE YOU AND ME who are very concerned about them are 'climate deniers' who don't want to do anything for the environment.... Science is objectional and he's suggesting anybody who is objective is simply in denial... sorry folks.... he's lying to you, your family and friends... His tactics are called Junk Politics.
acidhead43 2 years ago
We need a whole new government. One who cares about the USA, the people and the constitution. F this one world government crap. They cannot even run things over here, what is it going to look like when they take over the world? God help us.
TheLiddlekiddle 2 years ago
mojdfiv's stuff comes from a guy named Frederick Seitz who works for Exxon. Before that he worked for Big Tobacco. but these people will grasp at any claim. I am gonna keep saying it: Peer Review cannot be bought. It's fact. - now let's debate what to do about the facts.
Corporations8MyBaby 2 years ago
Science is progressive, and builds constantly on new information as it is gathered. It was premature for Gore to cause a worldwide scare, but very well planned.
ronniestuff08 2 years ago
Gore is a moron...
Practice what you preach Gore.
helltrackrider 2 years ago 3
Al gore is SO SLIMY...god how does anyone believe this leech
drunkenboxer1985 2 years ago 3
Because he merely reports unimpeachable scientific journals. You don't have to believe him or me... look at the science.
Corporations8MyBaby 2 years ago
He lists some facts and lies about those facts. Man made carbon emissions are NOT the majority of emissions being leaked into the atmosphere. Is pollution a serious issue? yes. So is deforestation that ruins the planets ability to filter carbon dioxide and generate oxygen. Al Gore is a lying piece of shit career politician who is looking to benifit financially as well as expand his own bloated ego and feeling of self-importance. Its a sham and no one is focusing on real issues
drunkenboxer1985 2 years ago 2
So, "many" climate models show man made global warming is reversing a natural swing to declining temperatures? This means some models do not show this result. It would also indicate Algore has been able to accurately predict natural cycles and differentiate them from man made influences. My God, this man is so smart. I wouldn't expect any less from the man that invented the internet.
gsuitter 2 years ago
First of all, the global warming trend accounts for a fraction of a degree temperature increase a year. To give an example of using your heater in July is idiotic. It's equivalent to a smoker arguing that smoking if fine for your health because he has been smoking for 20 years and is in good health.
wafflethug 2 years ago
I wish CNN would get more specific about the climategate emails and HOW they were taken out of context, as Gore claims...he's so set on his ideology I wonder if he even looked at them.
ace8842 2 years ago
He is in the 99.99th percentile of greenhouse "polluters".
Gore has also reached critical mass.
When we find out that some nukes were being "tested" at the polar cap in a few years, it won't be reported on CNN.
jag10 2 years ago