Added: 5 years ago
From: MrCakes132
Views: 19,912
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (95)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • i left gm for these babies.

  • @unseenufo I roll both. : )

  • Holy underrated power ratings Batman! I'd heard these were underrateed but I figured they dyno'd closer to 360, not 387!

  • @VicariousRider Yes horsepower tv got 364 on there dyno.

  • FLY WHEEL HORSE POWER (fwhp)

  • @jesuscanrap- yes Cobras are 420 at the crank they underated them so Cobras can range 370-393 rwhp stock, and if you slightly mod them forgetaboutit! your talking some serious power.

  • never had my 04 dynoed stock but with pullies, tune, cai, exhaust im at 476 to the wheels

  • @built04Cobra Just curious, is that typical for most Termis with that setup?

  • @VicariousRider yeah those are the typical mods most guys do, some might say there cheap mods but i dont considered 3500 cheap lol

  • FYI people, FWHP mean flywheel horse power... And all you morons are calling HIM stupid?...

  • Wonder how many pulls he had to make until he finally got the numbers he wanted

  • 0akliff is right

  • killer cobra. but yet now doesnt it piss you off that a stock 2011 gt has more power then your cobra,well in this vid at least

  • @skaterboy52093c the new ones are rated at 412 at the crank...these are proven to be 425 at the crank with 415tq at the crank...the new gt's are 390 tq at the crank...close though

  • yeah, since they got hand built engines they all make diff power stock, usually 350-390 at the wheels.

  • wow that like 435 to the crank stock they are so underated.

  • Comment removed

  • beautiful car my cobra is shock to and it dyno at 394hp they are awesome car!!!

  • In this video the car is stock. I have other videos after a pulley swap was done.

  • holy idiots up in here. Obviously the guy who said "fwhp" meant it to mean "fly wheel horse power." God damn, people.

  • no bad 390hp 387 at fly no bad one true cobra that is actually putting out advertised hp unlike the shitty gt500

  • no you moron; you're confused with wheel horsepower and flywheel horsepower all cars are rated at the flywheel from the factory.. this car is underrated from the factory by about 40-50 hp for lower insurance costs.. these cars put out closer to 440 flywheel horsepower.. the GT500 is is rated more accurately.. it does actually make 500 hp AT THE FLYWHEEL....

  • @saleenxxx its rated at 390 at the flywheel which puts it around 350 or 60 at the rear wheels. its being dynod at the rear wheels. which makes the flywheel hp that theyre rated at from the factory more like 430 which means its underrated. the gt500 is slightly underrated also, not as much as the termis though. you shouldn't have anything related to mustang as your name with knowledge like that.

  • @03silversvtcobra did you read what i said dumbass i said not bad 390hp 387rwhp i said not bad for stock cause its a drivetrain loss of hp i know wtf im talking about not my fault you didnt read what i said unlike the gt500 rated @ 500hp but dyno @ 410rwhp

  • @03silversvtcobra how is it 350 360 when your on a fucking video of it dynoing 387rwhp ahahha wow maybe you should take all the knowings of your name and leave cobra out of your name and just keep sliver got it sport

  • @saleenxxx also the gt500 makes more than they advertise. theyre shown at 550 and dynoing out at 525rwhp.

  • @03silversvtcobra so you cant argue gotta talk shit ahhahaha yet if the gt500 has 525 why cant it beat a older cobra or SS fucking stupid ass

  • @saleenxxx hmmm i dont know you tell me, go watch the dyno videos. The dyno must be lying!....riiiight. i dont think you understand the difference between the power at the rear wheels compared to the power at the flywheel and this is where you get confused. the numbers given from the factory is flywheel hp which typically will be higher than the rwhp unless the car is "sandbagged" for insurance purposes i.e. 2003-2004 cobras. they probably cant beat them due to weight/driver there tons of factor

  • @03silversvtcobra "sandbagged" for insurance purposes i.e. 2003-2004 cobras? yeah on a dyno vid i dont think his insurance gives a fuck

  • @03silversvtcobra yeah keep the BS comming your the only keeping yourself off topic AGIAN READ read what i said dumbass i said not bad 390hp 387rwhp i said not bad for stock cause its a drivetrain loss of hp i know wtf im talking about not my fault you didnt read what i said unlike the gt500 rated @ 500hp but dyno @ 410rwhp his is where you get confused? yet you didnt read it even if 450 its not going to make a difference its still 387RWHP your putting to the ground ,SLOW ARE WE?

  • @saleenxxx ya and thats the exact same thing ive been saying this whole time is exactly what you just put. you just like to bicker and bitch. i was just pointing something out on the original post giving you shit and you flip out. whats the fucking difference, they make more power than advertised and i was just pointing that out also. you need to cool your jets and go out and get a job, that way you can actually have a saleen.

  • @03silversvtcobra wow took you a whole day yeah that says alot ahahha

  • @saleenxxx its because i have a job and cant sit around on youtube all day bragging about my uncles car and collecting food stamps and government checks like you and the rest of your breed.

  • @03silversvtcobra ahah yeah where do white people get that bs? ive seen more lazy ass white people and yet you say some shit like that ahhah wow yet you dont know the differecne between FWHP and rear ahah DUMBASS another da ylater same shit TROLL ahahahahahha

  • @03silversvtcobra and you got that shit right off wiki dude face it

  • @03silversvtcobra underrated yet you cant argue with facts when your on a vid proving your wrong ahhahah wtf ahahahhaha

  • @saleenxxx and also could you specify what you mean by older cobra, the newest cobra made is the 04 and the next newest are the 63-67 shelby a/c cobra. and also what do you mean by ss? impala ss, monte carlo ss, silverado ss, cobalt ss, or possibly a camaro ss? either way none of these vehicles stock will touch a new gt500 stock. including the 03-04 cobras and i own one and i know, no they arent gt500 fast but they will definately get up and boogie if need be.

  • @03silversvtcobra ok yeah u wanna play this game ahahha also could you specify what you mean by older cobra, if it the answer is not infront of u which it is wtf are you going on about wtf you think i meant by older cobra? were only talking about 2 cobras here not a 99 or 98 so really , and SS ok what other SS is competing with a 03cbora or GT500? figure it out jesus AND THIS

    the next newest are the 63-67 shelby a/c cobra? ahahha wow your really going off topic

  • With a pully change and tuning these motors jump from 390 to about 460hp. Mostly just a lightning pulley and a predator tune.

  • 387 rwhp would mean the car actually has 455 hp at the crank using the .85 rule. thats unbelieveable considering the 02 Z06 beats it on the track but only has about 345ish rwhp stock...

  • The z06 is a lot lighter, and more aerodynamic. The suspension is also stiffen than the cobra.

  • yeah, i always heard that you want about a 50 hp advantage over a corvette if your driving a mustang if you want to beat it.

  • nope alil more than that

  • how many lbs of boost does it have from the factory?

  • 13 pounds of boost

  • Actually with the pulley I was seeing around 12-13 lbs...from the factory they only see about 8 lbs.

  • not surprised these cars are known to put down better than Ford rated numbers, the best Mustangs ever made are the Terminators!!!

  • OK maybe im gonna sound like an idiot but i thought these cars were rated at 390 at the crank but it seems like thats what they get at the wheels. So was ford just really underating it or do some of the cars i see have unusually strong engines.

  • dude thats complete bull shit i own an 04 cobra and recently had the heads and cam changed out...the shop that did the job asked me if i would like to make a dyno run before and after the car had work done to it so i figured yeah what the hell... it dyno'd stock at 386rwhp so this is not true and afte the work was done it dyno'd at 492rwhp

  • BULLSHIT.

  • My comment is to hockeydude who said this is fake, and then said after he changed his heads and "cam." You must mean camS, because these cars have FOUR of them. You wouldn't change cams unless you are running a twin screw or TT setup and want to get every last bit of power, stock heads and cams are very capable.

  • What? No, they have 4 cams. 2 on each bank.

  • oh i see what you were talking about now haha, yeah i was talking about the camshafts, not the lobes

  • 03/04 COBRAS make at max 375 rwhp stock on a dyno that's calibrated professionally. If anybody can prove this wrong I would like to see a video of it. Type in the 03 cobra horsepower tv keyword in youtube and watch the video.

  • great numbers man my 03 cobra made 406&398 to the wheels with just a flowmaster catback

  • ummmmm.. does anyone remember the class action lawsuit a few years ago (2000/2002?) somewhere in there. ford was sued over their HP rating on the cobra because it did`nt make what was stated. so ford made sure they could make ample power then rate it lower so there would`nt be any question.. think about it..... i`ve heard some stock cobra`s (03/04) hitting 415, 420 RWHP. BONE STOCK. yes. to there rear wheels.

    whoever started the front wheel drive crap should be shot.

  • 1999, and that's why they only came out with the Cobra R in 2000

  • my cobra is an 04 made stock 422 and 417 tq

  • Gooood dayuuuum that's high for stock... I never got a chance to dyno mine stock :/ got stolen then recovered 2 weeks later with an estimated 500rwhp. Haven't taken it to the dyno yet. I'm not complaining though :D

  • hehe well that was with a pully ...... i was told when i bought it it was stock........ i bought it with every option for 25,769 so i aint comlaining

  • Oh well a pulley is good for like 30 wheel HP lol I was gonna say...

  • hehe well that was with a pully ...... i was told when i bought it it was stock........ i bought it with every option for 25,769 so i aint comlaining

  • haha thats not any ting to gripe about

  • i hate FWD 2 dude....... in some cases there cool but u cant beat RWD

  • half you guys on this comment list are retarded...dont talk about shit if you dont know

  • if anyone believes that a Cobra is front wheel, they need to slap themselves.

  • You stupid fucks, its not front wheel.

  • the reason the cobra was underated is because if you have 400hp your insurence goes up too so they underated it

  • lol... i didnt know they were front wheel drive either... but yes the factory estimation is not accurate... they make roughly 425 at the fly wheel... depending on conditions... but 390 or to the wheels bone stock is a lil hard to believe... not saying its impossible... just never seen it before... but maybe i have now.

  • A Terminator is way under rated.

  • I like it that way, because the fact that people think its a GT.Which means u can suprise the shit out of them when u destroy som1 LOL

  • bone stock and you're making 387 RWHP.... there is now way..cobras are 420FWHP... you have something else done to it

  • ....lol?

  • crackhead?

  • @MrCakes132 is this guy @jesuscanrap  for real? HAHAHAHAAA FWHP? a cobra is front wheel drive? lol

  • @naamanb Fly Wheel hp

  • @bdodge83 ok,ok my bad. i admit i'm wrong. i just never heard anyone use it like that before.

  • Nope its true buddy, ive seen stock cobra's 03/04 get up to 390..395 if they are lucky, but thats it. Looks like ford rated the HP for the Cobra incorrectly that monster has like over 410 IMO or more lol

  • yeah i know they were rated wrong on their HP. they suppoesly make 425 flywheel. but seeing it dyno it around 390 to the wheels is where i call B/S. maybe a factory freak. w/e

  • I didn't know Mustangs were front wheel drive...

  • Believe it. I'v been watching em dyno between 370/390RWHP since the late summer of 02. These cars have between 430/450hp at the crank. It makes sense though if you think that this is basically the same supercharged 4.6 DOHC that they used in the 1993 Mustang MachIII Concept which they rated at 450 crank hp.

  • fw? but mustangs are rwd...

  • @jesuscanrap dude..dnt you mean RWHP? and cobras do have 425 BHP but ford rated them at 390

  • @jesuscanrap hahaha fwhp...let me guess you drive a honda?

  • @jesuscanrap fwhp?

  • @SliqhtlyStoopid fly wheel hp more to say engine hp (what the factory rates it at) then you go and get it dyno'd and its different u know what i mean

  • @SliqhtlyStoopid i said not bad 390hp 387rwhp i said not bad for stock cause its a drivetrain loss of hp the other dude misread what i said and started talking shit

  • @jesuscanrap FWHP? lol when did combras become front wheel drive LOL..... oh and almost all CObra dynoe 380+. Ford underated them there more around 430-440 crank HP

  • @jesuscanrap 420fwhp?! please tell me don't mean "Front Wheel Horse Power" by that. because yes, the cobra have that kind of number. they were under rated from the factory (390hp/390tq) and with the drivetrain loss, these numbers are about right. and the cobra is rear wheels drive. always was, always will be. I'm not saying you have NO FUCKING IDEA what your taking about, but...

  • @jesuscanrap cobras were very underrated 

  • @jesuscanrap frot whel horse power... or do you mean it makes 420 at the crank?

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more