95% of christians don't know the bible

[martynblackburn1977]

I'd put that up to 99.9% of Christians do not understand or know the Bible, and that includes theologians and other fakes.

[TelluluSnape]

Point is the bible was written by men, if it was by a real 'God' wouldn't it make more since, be more logical, more scientificly proovable and without all the controdictions? I was in a real religous home but studying the bible for myself I came to my own believes.

[jinko17]

@ironman197268

Are you seriously trying to say that the Noah's Arc story is true? Have you heard of geology, zoology, or common sense?

[dex1391]

wholly red herring batman!!!

[dex1391]

2 billion Christians on this planet.

And "none" of them have taken the time to investigate.

Seriously? You really want to make that claim?

[brush200400]

I think this video is is is is is is good.

[ironman197268]

God Yahweh forgive me for being judgemental, but this guy needs to be on the set of Star Wars playing Jabba The Hut!! Man, what are you doing? The Holy Bible was written 3500 years ago, not 2000? You really need to take a reading class before you make stupid videos like this one!! You wish most Christians don't know anything about science, Why is C14 found inside of diamonds?

[rednecktrucker1969]

@ironman197268 I think you mean a Mythology class, not reading. I have read the bible, and with so many contradictions and wrong science, it could only reasonably be taught in a Mythology class. The question is not why there in Carbon in an item made of Carbon, the question is, why do you believe a book writted so long ago by hole-pooping Arabs?

[ironman197268]

@rednecktrucker1969 Moses wrote the book of Genesis, we'll start there. This was somewhere around 3500 years ago. I'm talking about Carbon 14, the unstable radioisotope that's formed in the atmosphere from a hydrogen atom, blasting nitrogen atoms... after about 1 trillion times, In the Earths atmosphere, this unstable radioisotope lives for 5730 years... and then splits back into a nitrogen atom. Why is all that found in 600 million year old Diamonds?

[rednecktrucker1969]

@ironman197268 No prof that Noah was even an actual person (except to a believer) I did the Google work for you and answers in Genisis confirms your claim, however they lie outright in saying the the samples wer uncontaminated, the facts are (on a real web site) that the carbon was contaminated with N and due to how diamonds are made, the N was frozen in time essentially. Check more than 1 site before making these absurd claims. ):

[ironman197268]

@rednecktrucker1969 Contamination huh? This magical C14 leeched it's way into the hardest substance known to man and was able to last for millions of years, not 5730 years(you know, the half life of C14) That claim is actually the result of underground uranium, not nitrogen. I wrote this comment without using Google at all!! I've been throwing this claim at people like you for years now, and guess what you'll end up doing...BLOCKING me!!

[ironman197268]

@rednecktrucker1969 Oh yeah, no proof that Attila the Hun was an actual person either, except to a believer. Noah left LOTS of evidence, like Giant oysters and clams found on Mt. Everest, petrified in the CLOSED position, just 3000 feet from the top of the mountain, and 450 miles away from the nearest ocean where they belong. What do you think about all that?

[rednecktrucker1969]

@ironman197268 Oh my, are you like 4 years old, you are really making yourself look like a dumb-ass. GOOGLE stuff b4 u attempt to share it with others, unless you like riding on the short bus. Learn some geology, and also study how fast a clam can grow and how they live.

The stuff you are bringing here is meant to impress TINY children and OLD folks that can't type google on a computer, you have a YT acct, use it, search for things before you mindlessly parrot it.

[ironman197268]

@rednecktrucker1969 I did all that research years ago. Are you in denial about the existence of giant oysters and clams in the closed position on the top of Mt. Everest?

[kittley1984]

@ironman197268 .

[Xenophile665]

@ironman197268 Cite one single item of independent archaeological or historical evidence that says that the bible was written Circa 1500 BCE, 3500 years ago. Good luck with that.

[ironman197268]

@Xenophile665 Wow! A 2 minute Google search pulled up all kinds of info to answer your question. Now, cite some archaeological evidence it was written 2000 years ago. Good luck with that.

PS Was the user name "Xenophile666" already taken when you signed up?

[Xenophile665]

@ironman197268 Yes, I can see your citations in your post (sarc). Try citing the evidence, not just saying, "Wow I found a carload on Google!" I don't need archaeological evidence citations to show it was written 2000 years ago. Anyone knows that the NT was written Circa 2000 years ago; even you.

P.S. How would I know if Xenophile666 was already taken? I didn't apply for it.

[ironman197268]

@Xenophile665 Man there's pages of that information, I'm not typing all that out just because you're too lazy to look it up. I'm not talking about the new testament, I'm talking about the beginning of the Bible. Moses started writing it 3500 years ago.

[Xenophile665]

@ironman197268 It's not laziness, it's your claim, you should cite the evidence. I've seen the "pages of that info," and most of it is either "we aren't certain" or fundamentalist dogma. You know for a fact that Moses started writing it 3500 years ago? Did Moses write the first five books of the bible? Or just the first four?

[ironman197268]

@Xenophile665 It most certainly is not my claim, the writings of The Bible starting around 3500 years ago is based off of the genealogies in it. When you add all that up, Moses came in to the picture about 3500-3700 years ago. Anybody that reads The Bible knows this. Why are you so obsessed with that anyway? And yes, Moses wrote the first 5 books of The Bible.

[Xenophile665]

@ironman197268 Yes, and the creation of the universe was Circa 6,000 years ago, "based off of the genealogies in it." Are you a YEC (Young-Earth Creationist)?

Moses did not write all of the first five books of the bible. Scholars have known this for almost two centuries. Google the Documentary Hypothesis. Go to your library, check out a copy of "Who Wrote the Bible?" by Richard Elliott Friedman.

[ironman197268]

@Xenophile665 So you really believe this Richard Elliott has some way of knowing that Moses did not write the first 5 books of The Bible? And this has been known so for almost 200 years, yet publishers kept right on printing copies of The Holy Bible... I'm glad you told me what YEC stands for, I had know idea. Just check out my page man.

[Xenophile665]

@ironman197268 Elliott is not alone, it's been known for more than 200 years, but those who first noted it were labelled heretics and had to run for their lives or recant in order to escape persecution and/or execution.

Publishers also print the Quran and the Book of Mormon, et. al.. That doesn't make such publications true.

[whiteowl1415]

@ironman197268

"The Holy Bible was written 3500 years ago, not 2000?"

Actualy it was written 1686 Years ago You guys have been talking about the Torah, the Bible didn't come about till after the Council of Nicea when religious leaders VOTED on what would or would not be contained in it.

[ironman197268]

@whiteowl1415 I don't know what Bible you're talking about, but the one I read was written around 3500 years ago, when Moses started writing the book of Genesis.

[pianoboypiano]

what you know might not be so dot com slash graphs dot html

[pianoboypiano]

ok lastly some questions!!

1. Does the Bible tell Christians to ignore science?

2. If so, then where?

3. What is the smallest elemental particle in science?

4. Why does the univese the physical constants such as Plank's Constant, Coulomb's Constant, Faraday's Constant and others?

5. Why does the universe obey nuclear magneton, speed of light (in a vacuum), Avogadro's Number and others?

6. How did life begin?

7. What field of study can have proofs?

[rednecktrucker1969]

@pianoboypiano 1. not directly but it has alway hindered sciece, study for yourself

2. see 1

3. a graviton would be my guess

4. think of it like a soup, you ad the right spices you get soup, the wrong ones, you get something else.

5. forces act in ways that we both know and don't know, one thing I can say is that they are causational and all effect eachother.

6. a big bang. :)

7. all fields of study in some ways point to there being no god.

[pianoboypiano]

@rednecktrucker1969

1. medieval scientists were mostly christian. without their thirst to know more about God through science, we probably wouldn't be where we are today.

2. Still waiting for answer

3. Gravitons are hypothetical, and if exists would have no mass, therefore, it could not be a particle...

4. I meant to ask why the universe OBEYS those laws. my fault...

5. wouldn't there need to be a primary cause though to start the others?

7. Not what I'm asking...

[rednecktrucker1969]

@pianoboypiano 1. true, but once they challenged the church they were killed, or otherwise locked away(ie Gallaleo)

2. bible gives instruction to rub dirt on open wounds and many other stupid things, these were held as laws for many centuries until the enlightenment.

3. smallest particle with mass (what? don't you have Google?) would be atoms

4. Everything is symbyotic, think of it as pushes and shoves, things counterbalancing all the time.

5.no

[pianoboypiano]

@rednecktrucker1969

1. Also for politics

2. where did it say to do that?! just looked it up and there is nothing about that... show me where it says that first... but it wouldnt be a law anyway... more of a health tip i guess...

3. wrong. quarks... and even they are being studied because scientists are sure THOSE are made up of smaller partials... where does it finally stop getting smaller? scientists have no clue...

[pianoboypiano]

@rednecktrucker1969 4. Not necessarily... are all the laws related to the same principle? no. some are related towards atoms and others towards the universe...

5. so it all started at one time?

6. forgot this one earlier... a big bang? what caused the big bang? is there scientific proof for the big bang?

7. never answered it...

[rednecktrucker1969]

@pianoboypiano 5. time cannot exist without a context or reference point, so, yes it all started at one "time".

6. yes there are many proofs of a big bang, background radiation being the most obvious one.

7. I did answer it. I cannot bring you up to speed on psychology, cosmology, astronomy, biology, and all the other "ologies" out there, I have spent 42 years learning them and so can you.:)

[pianoboypiano]

@rednecktrucker1969 I have other questions too. 1,2,3,and4.

5. So where and how did it start. should the universe have started like you said, then chemicals or elements could never have existed previously. Then there wouldn't have been a start.

6. background radiation is primarily emitted from the earth and solar rays. Not from big bang.

7. ok. math is the only field you can have "proofs". look up a geometry course and try not to get bored. i hated that course. Science is fallible.

7.

[rednecktrucker1969]

@pianoboypiano 5. yes exactly, before there were things, there were no things!:)

6. your understanding of "background" radiation is very poor, google it.

7. Yes, science is fallible, it does not try to be rigid and set in stone, that is the great thing about it, we can learn more and change our opinion about something.

[pianoboypiano]

@rednecktrucker1969 5. So you even you admit that something had to put the universe here seeing as there was nothing one moment, and something the next.

6. I did, it is only a theory so far. but i found an entirely different usage of background radiation than what you were referring to- Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation.

7. But you seem to hold modern science as god. but something generally accepted today may very well be disproven tomorrow...

[rednecktrucker1969]

@pianoboypiano 5.I admitted nothing except that you have a completely wrong sense of how the big bang works, and until you learn more about it , it is pointless to persue this line.

6. So you are now officially a trainee for creationism, you have learned how to lie and twist words to suit your definitions. The the next Ken Ham I suppose.

See learning is not about how you can twist thingas to suit your own needs, this type of stuff is morally repugnant and further proof of no gods at all.

[pianoboypiano]

@rednecktrucker1969 the whole idea of the big bang is utterly ridiculous. you deny the existence of God but you believe in something that is physically impossible.

i did not twist words around to suit the definitions. you say i make cop out arguments!

using crap arguments as "proof" for no God does not sound to me like an intelligent person but a moron! the enjoyment of debate is over... go back to school

[rednecktrucker1969]

@pianoboypiano you do not know what you scoff at, that is the real moronic part here. I feel sorry for you and wish you nothing but the best, but until you can out grow Santa...oops God. and let go of your fear, you will just keep walking on the same tred mill. Having the same debates with every atheist you come accross, and losing them as well. You will become bitter, and jaded, and probably make a ton of money selling your line of crap to gullible masses. good luck with that.

[pianoboypiano]

@rednecktrucker1969 who said I lost, you hardly even debated my initial points. just answered the question that I posed at the end. If you only answer questions and never debate the issues, then the one who presented the arguments is the "winner".

[rednecktrucker1969]

@pianoboypiano fine "Charlie"- your WINNING!

[rednecktrucker1969]

@pianoboypiano 7. I do not hold science to be a god, this is just an inflamitors statement that creationists love to throw about. They love to thing of Atheism as a "religion", like if they can bring us down to their level it makes them more right or something. It gets sickening after a point, you can explain it over and over again, and the same things keep poping up.

Like most of your questions, did you know they are mostly from a book written in the 1930's? This is how old your arguments are.

[pianoboypiano]

@rednecktrucker1969 i didnt get them from a book. those are valid questions. and saying that atheists are above christians in a condescending manner is extremely disgusting.

[rednecktrucker1969]

@pianoboypiano truth does not wait to look beautiful, it just is truth, it often is ugly, and unpalitable, thats why it is the truth.

Cant live your life on sweets all the time, it is bad for your health, religion is the same way, it eventually eats away at you until there is nothing but a mindless drone left behind.

eat you veggies, get some truth, nomatter how much you may dislike them, you need them to be healthy and strong.

[pianoboypiano]

@rednecktrucker1969 so every elderly christian you meet is a mindless drone? you obviously dont get out much. like i said, intelligence and christianity are completely separated but can very well go hand in hand. being cynical is way worse for the mind then being "religious"

[rednecktrucker1969]

@pianoboypiano However, when we know something we don't keep fighting over it, we know geometry works because it is demonstratable, not because someone in church told us it is true. That is the main difference.

[pianoboypiano]

@rednecktrucker1969 But you have it wrong again. Yes geometry, a field of mathematics, can be proven. But Christians don't go to church to learn math, science, music, history, grammar, or anything else. That is not the point of the church. Hebrews 10:25 says to not forsake the assembling of ourselves. That is why Christians go to church. you are trying to replace Christianity with science. but they are not related.

[rednecktrucker1969]

@pianoboypiano I in no way want a bunch of scientists to gather once a week and repeat 1+1=2 for an hour like mindless sheep because that is all they are allowed to learn because to learn any more would be blasphamy. I leave that kind of absurb crap to religion.

School prayer, creationism, sounds like the religious want to put church in the schools, not the other way around.

[pianoboypiano]

@rednecktrucker1969 I'm not promoting that... I'm just saying that your kind of contradictory not believing in God from lack of proof and having such a high regard for science even though there is just evidence- no "proof" There is evidence both for and against God and for certain aspects of science and against certain aspects of science. Though I'm against teaching creationism in school, check this out. about prayer taken out of school.

[rednecktrucker1969]

@pianoboypiano I in no way want a bunch of scientists to gather once a week and repeat 1+1=2 for an hour like mindless sheep because that is all they are allowed to learn because to learn any more would be blasphamy. I leave that kind of absurb crap to religion.

School prayer, creationism, sounds like the religious want to put church in the schools, not the other way around.

[pianoboypiano]

so you think we dont read anything else but the bible? it is a very ridiculous claim with again no evidence to back it up. i personally read a lot of classic literature. i read my textbooks. i love reading murder mysteries. i know a lot about math and science, music history (i despise regular history) and many other things so dont group me or most of the people i know into you category of "christians that only know the bible." your claim is completely false.

[pianoboypiano]

im going to skip the bicycle argument because as you said, "one christian told you" not all have that mindset. again a hasty generalization. "when we inject god into our lives, then we live in constant fear." ??? I dont know why you say this because i have no fear in my life, most if not all christians i know are very happy people. you never brought up any logic or evidence to support that claim. "we know only a 100 yo book of whole pooping bronze aged people" again ???

[pianoboypiano]

a lot of older southern christians do not have college education or phds. a lot probably had to work on the farm or help out the family in some way and had no time or money to go to college. it is not that they arent smart in some ways, but they didnt have the opportunity to get a better education... "none of the 4 to 5 million believers did not investigate chrisitianity. again, where are the studies and sources. this claim is completely false with no evidence.

[pianoboypiano]

if i knew nothing about science like you say most christians are like, then i probably would not have gotten into UNC and i wouldnt be trying to enter the medical field. next, my pastor is a former nurse. her sister who goes to our church is a nurse. obviously they know a lot about the body, diseases, and medicine- all aspects of science. now a lot of christians dont know about science but equally a lot of atheists know nothing about science.

[pianoboypiano]

i dont know about you but the church i go to does not try to preach science to us... therefore, i dont use what i learn from church to contradict science. 1. science and church are two completely different aspects that are completely unrelated. 2. i dont try to contradict science- most christians dont. we dont say all science is wrong thought it is fallible and limited. i read science, im going to UNC in the fall and plan to go into the medical field.

[pianoboypiano]

again evidence? you are committing major fallacies of hasty generalization and unsupported assertion. you group "most" christians together and create a claim based off of no evidence. how about looking up christian scientists from the past and present. its on wikipedia. look it up. "little minds"? insults. means nothing. "we think we know the formula for the universe" umm no. we believe in god. neither group knows the "formula for the universe" whatever that is supposed to mean.

[pianoboypiano]

wow. so much wrong with the video- i have no clue where to start. i guess ill start with title of the video. 95%. if you have a statistic, then you must have a source and study. you provide neither. next. "we assume too much." maybe you assumed or agreed with most of what the pastor told you but that would not be living like a true christian. we are supposed to have a personal relationship with god. personal not through a middleman like a pastor. next "most christians know nothing about science"

[rednecktrucker1969]

@pianoboypiano ok, what you don't know is. This video was in responce to an other video. I used his verbage and simply swapped out "science" for christianity and "atheist" for christian.... it was a rather nice parody until he closed his account, because he got tired of utterly losing to me. :) So all of you comments may have merit, simply because my video started with a very flawed christian premiss. So actually you kinda just pwned yourself.

[pianoboypiano]

@rednecktrucker1969 how about you refute my arguments like an intelligent person that you claim you are instead of "you pwned yourself"

[KeusFrench]

You probably just know everything don't you. Your an absolute moron.

[rednecktrucker1969]

@KeusFrench Your comments don't even make sense, how can someone know everything and be a moron....oh wait, that describes god, so your comment only makes sense to christians I guess.

[chrismarshva]

I get the impression most Christians don't follow the instructions,don't know what the instructions are, just do what all the other Christians do. Just like on the highway people don't read the speed sign, they just drive like everyone else.

Well I read the instructions at least three times.

Baptized 7/18/1993

[warpten16]

I think the world would be a better place without religion. For instance, look at the muslims reaction to Rushdie's book. Those religious men's mind are twisted and deluded. Religion contain both negative and postivie aspects, but those negative are really too much. I think throughout history religion have done more damage than profit.

BTW my english is far from perceft so don't go facepalming on me for using words out of context LOL

[rocketbeagle0]

Sigh... Why do people have to lump groups together as if they're all one organism? Everyone is different. There will always be a Jewish person who's a jerk and a Jewish person who's awesome. An African American who you'd like to smack, and an African American you wished you could see more often because they're so cool, funny and nice. My family's Christian, and my grandfather was one of the rocket scientists in Huntsville during the days of the Pluto project. My point, we're all human.

[rednecktrucker1969]

@rocketbeagle0 Very true, well put. However this leads to even more questions, like, if there is only one god then everyone should be worshiping in the same way right?

[rocketbeagle0]

@rednecktrucker1969 I don't think everyone should worship in the same way. Everyone's view on religion is different, and I'm in no way a radical. In fact, I'm a pretty lax Christian, as I believe in science more often than not, but I like to think that there's something after death. My sister believes that God made the world like a computer program, and now he's just letting it run. In any case, we'll never know until we're dead. :(

[rednecktrucker1969]

@rocketbeagle0 "In any case, we'll never know until we're dead" Not the case at all. See this is where science and religion have the worst fights. Science keeps asking questions and seeking the truth. Religion thinks it has all the answers and nothing can refute those answers.

Also, many christians would disagree with your sister and the computer program idea, and furthermore would say that she will burn in hell for that idea. Best to leave religion to the nut jobs of the world. :)

[rocketbeagle0]

@rednecktrucker1969 Well, it all really depends on how someone interprets religion. I think the radicals who think that people should burn in hell for their beliefs are people who don't have... good... brains, I don't know. :P They're not all nutjobs, although there are some... and they are nutjobs. What I tend to do is think about something like God or the world, come to a conclusion, and that's that. Why waste time going over things I've already been over? ;)

[drinkmoresoda]

@rocketbeagle0 dear sir, please REMOVE YOURSELf from the cult. it can only help humanity

[4me2cclearly]

@rocketbeagle0

Well said and I understand what you mean by this comment. When life is at it’s worst, many people find comfort in there religion. But just because they want it to be true, does not make it so.

I can respect a person that believes by faith, much more than one that claims absolute self-righteous certainty.

Come by and drop a line sometime.

[maynardcommando]

You're an idiot. Your judgements are contradictory to your message. You say the Bible is poorly written fiction? Stephenie Meyer is poorly written fiction. Whether or not the Bible is true is irrelevent to its literary value. YOU ARE NOT A LITERARY CRITIC. Your statement is completely and ironically unqualified; in the same way that ignorant christians believe that the earth is 6000 years old. You do not have to know everything. You only have to know what you are talking about.

[rednecktrucker1969]

What on Earth are you doing on You Tube? This is a forum where anyone can have an opinion about anything. Otherwise it would be called Experts only Tube. As for the bible being fiction, it is, this has been proven over and over again, if you lack the skills to do research for yourself, do not condemn others for doing so. As for it being poorly written, one merely has to read it to determine this.

[maynardcommando]

You are a poor reader and your foolishness is the result. Cormac McCarthy said, "The sad truth, is that books are made out of books." One could watch "Blade Runner", "Ghost in a Shell", or "The Matrix" and see an amazing abundance of literary allusions tied to the Bible. Do you think that Ridley Scott thinks the Bible is poorly written? Would a public university teach a class called "The Bible as Lit" if it were doggerel? "Violence and the Sacred" reveals the true function of religion.

[rednecktrucker1969]

I took Bible as Lit in high school, and there are some good phases to it. However, it does not rob me of my right to have an opinion on the topic, just because there is a class based upon it.

It would be like saying that god exists just because one fool believes it. It does not stop the person from being an idiot and it does not prove gods existence either.

People reference all kinds of works that you may not like or think are badly written as well.

[maynardcommando]

In science and math, there is one right answer. Why should the arts be any different? Allusion and reference are two different words for a reason.  They have different meanings. You are an idiot.

[rednecktrucker1969]

AHHH the last resort of the failed argument, name calling....lol

christians are so predictable, really kind of sad. Someone cannot hold a conversation for more than 3 comments before resorting to name calling. (note in my prev comment I did not call u an idiot, I called a hypothetical person one)

There has never been one right answer in science, everything is open for debate, that is why it always wins over rigid dogmatic religions.

[airraideagle]

rednecktrucker: I watched this video, listened, and smiled because I agree with everything you said. It's all so fucking true!

[oscber]

I hope your life gets better. God bless.

[rednecktrucker1969]

I hope yours does to. May God-Be-Less!

[oscber]

PSA 14:1 The fool says in his heart, "There is no God." They are corrupt,

their deeds are vile; there is no one who does good.

The funny thing is that I do know about science. I'm not going to discuss what I do in my personal life with a stranger. If you once were a Christian like you "claim", you would know that god cannot be less. No matter what you do, If you repent he will be there for you.

May God bless

[rednecktrucker1969]

You are correct, god cannot be less, to be less than 0 would be a negative existence. Also I do not recall you being invited to discuss your life with a stranger either. I was merely restating what you said with the opposing view point.

May you be Godless

[oscber]

What are your thoughts on Judaism, and Muslims? Your entire arsenal is against Christian while there are hundreds of religions on this earth. The bible does speak about those who will rise against Christians. In the end of times,your science will eventually make you take the number of the beast. Think about what you saying, specially if you knew god and you have chosen to turn your back on him. Something terrible must have happened to you and now you are hiding behind science. I

[oscber]

Where do I start? I feel bad for you sir. I hope that one day you realize what you are doing to yourself.  God will always forgive you, as long as you repent. You need to educate yourself a little more. God created science and everything on this earth. Christians are not against science, people like you attempt to make Christians look bad. I hope that you are happy with your life. Enjoy reading your science and learn more about the bible before you start talking about it.

[xleo21]

hahhaha

your sooo deluded , maybe you should read the bible for once

[charliebrailey1981]

people would do things like that. The Bible said men would become lovers of themselves. At any rate, I do have a legitimate question. If you are so against all forms of God, why do you mostly post vids that dog Christianity? Why not any other major religions? I am just curious. Because by you dogging Christianity, just makes every word the Bible said true. Satan tricks people so easy, but not I =)

good day to you sir, and ur now blocked =)

[charliebrailey1981]

I really dont have the time to keep going back and forth on this. I am looking stuff up on ebay. In my last post, I simply said I am going to worship Jesus Christ my savior, God, and the Holy Spirit. That is what I am going to do because I know they are real.

You choose not to worship them, and that is your right. I am not making an attack on you. I am simply saying good luck in all that you do. You spend your whole life making vid's trying to debunk Christianity. The bible said

[charliebrailey1981]

Also, not to be funny...but a good book to read is 23 minutes in hell. It is a very well written book , and even if you don't believe the mans story, it is still a very well written book. Thanks again and take care

[rednecktrucker1969]

I have read it actually. Thanks for the recommendation. I can recommend over 50 million books on psychology and science to you, but then again, if you were to read them, religion would come crashing down like a house of cards, so best not to do that. :)

[charliebrailey1981]

There is no evidence that God is imaginary, and even if MANKIND came up with its form of evidence, I would still continue to live my life for Jesus Christ. I know in my heart that there is a God, and I know that you have free will not to worship him. It is your choice, and I'll just leave it at that. If you think the fact that a man can impregnant a woman, and that we have such finely tuned bodies, and its call just chance. You think that. Its all up to you. Take care and good luck!

[rednecktrucker1969]

Yes and if you want to reject the increasing amout of evidence and live according to a book that tells you to kill your children and rape and murder then thats ok too.... oh wait, that aint ok. Good day to you too.

[charliebrailey1981]

You say , that I need to be like you? Yea, I'm gonna pass on that one. But thanks for the offer.

Your atheist views are sickening to me, but thats your choice. Its about like me saying, that perhaps none of us even really exist. That this is all just a dream. You are just a figment of the imagination of some super being on another planet.

LOL ...... We can from monkeys...yea....That sounds just as stupid@

[rednecktrucker1969]

Why would my views sicken you. The fact that someone escaped religion and no longer believes in imaginary beings, that sickens you?

[charliebrailey1981]

Didn't your dad just die recently? I saw a video, from another youtuber saying that your father had just passed away.  I sincerely hope that he found Christ before he died. I am not going to judge him, however before you call Christians dumb and spend so much time downing Christianity , why dont you spend that time doing something better. Like helping fight aids, or helping the homeless, or anything useful to society. You just want to spend hundreds of hours trying to debunk Christianity.sad

[rednecktrucker1969]

My father was agnostic and he went the same place we all go, in the dirt, nothing more, so your veiled threats fall upon deaf ears.

I am an active member of the International Human Rights Commission, A member of MENSA, and PFLAG. I am the vice-president of my community council and spend 10 hours a week at the local food bank. I am the example that you need to follow.

[charliebrailey1981]

and 95% of people who say they believe in Evolution , can't explain it! Why do you people try to spend so much time trying to debunk Christianity. Then you say Christians have a little mind. Well I think you are the one who has a little mind, however, your fat body doesn't go well with it. Sad man

[rednecktrucker1969]

But 100% of the evidence is for evolution. Personal attacks do not phase me in the slightest, you should join me on blog TV sometime and see what people call me. Again, showing your true morality and values does nothing but make people think less of you and more of me, so keep em comin.

[rednecktrucker1969]

Also, the term 'little mind' was Minister John's phrase, you should watch his video first, like was recommended. :)

[yashatono]

has string theory been accepted now? i though it was still in the proccess of being accepted as a theory?

[rednecktrucker1969]

It depends on who you talk to, but yes it has been accepted as a theory, there is enough data for that much, it still may turn out to be a dead end but somehow I doubt it.

[yashatono]

oh, that was news to me. thanks. :)

[mathmexican4234]

Yeah i spent my childhood going to church and shit...what a fuckin waste of time. I heart science :D

[sonicjet700]

HA!i do too!! we have so much in common

[makunouchi95]

So what if science doesn't have all the answers? Sometimes "I don't know" is better than something absurd or otherwise insane as an answer. At least when you say that you don't know, you are honest to yourself. Now, without the bible, can you prove that Yahweh exists?

[thisissick22]

it hurts to know you're wrong doesn't it?

[Imaginefree69]

95% of christians don't know" the Bible"

So true!

How many, many times have I had xians angrily tell me

"That's wrong! You don't know what the Bible says!

Er... where is that found in the Bible?"

The best way to learn how ugly, vague, erroneous and internally inconsistent the Bible is, is to READ it!

If xians would begin to read the book in a big way

we would soon see church attendance drop to nothing.

[rednecktrucker1969]

great comments!

[Zoisitetta]

Duuuuuuude, you rock!

[makunouchi95]

Oh, you don't how much Christians there are who try to dispute evolution they think its the origin of life. "Well Mr. Evolutionist, how does life form from lightning striking a mud puddle?" is basically their answer. but once they know its the origin of life, they say" How can all of this happen by random blind mutations, Hmm? there must be a creator", which is like(or it is) god of the gaps. Apparently, they think they are smarter than scientists with 35 more I.Q points than them.

[RDSchley]

Your explanation is golden. As for "religious" people don't know anything about science. Its not that they don't know. its that they substitute what they believe in voids where their God cannot explain. Such as The verse "and god shackled the earth to the heavens, Genesis" its vagueness blends into many things from science such as Gravity or mabye Space or even the rotation of the night sky from the ground. its not " i dont know" its more "god told me the truth" silly really

[earthypig]

you are so right - i was brought up as christian -- but the day i actually picked up the Bible to read was the beginning of the end for me. I was a young teenager at the time, but c'mon -- when you ACTUALLY read it, how can you take the bible seriously? apart from the Ecclesiastes and a few verses, much of it was like a bad joke slapped together by a schizophrenic.

[rednecktrucker1969]

if you like that you should check out the true B.S. series on my channel. :)

[SloganLogan]

fucking awesome!!

[rednecktrucker1969]

thanks!

[SloganLogan]

i just loved the bike prayer being switched around. that was my favorite

[meanjean29]

Eric Hoffer reborn?

[rednecktrucker1969]

who?!?

[rednecktrucker1969]

Googled Eric, nice quotes, and yes I have many quotes too. One of my newest ones.-"When we learn we grow, when we grow we know, and when we know, we no longer have to believe."

[meanjean29]

Agreed.

[slithra]

thank you for spinning it around back on that idiot

[exdemon1120]

Thank you!!!!!!

[sk8ter503]

well how do u explain the prophys in the bible?

[rednecktrucker1969]

That is pretty easy, actually. There is no historical account of the people in the bible, and what is in history, does not match-up. It is pretty common knoledge that the bible was constructed from seperate stories at the council of Nicea, long after the reported time of Jesus' death. So reverse engineering is probably the most accurate answer.

[sk8ter503]

yes there is! in my historic text book it talks about jesus being born, and him dying 4 our sins. and how do u explain all the miracles he did? plus there are prophys happening right now.

[rednecktrucker1969]

If your talking about the bible, it was never written to be an historical document. The miricles are unimpressive by todays standards, we can cure blind people, leprasy is under control, and we no longer believe that deamons are the cause of illness. As for prophys- there are coincidenses, and our braind love to peice things together and make sence out of them, nothing more. Educate yourself and never stop learning. :)

[bluago]

It is pretty STUPID "knoledge" to believe that the whole Bible was assembled then. The Hebrew books existed long before the New Testament books, that is, unless you consider common historical "knoledge" irrelevant.

[wackyMacky801]

can you do a video on string theory?

[rednecktrucker1969]

Sure, I'll make a short introduction video, should take a few days.

[Answersinbooks]

Guideoftheblind, aka. Kaz6350, How many times? Your view of science, the scientific method and the climate of the earth are WRONG! I have made videos to explain them to you yet you refuse to watch them and learn.

[rednecktrucker1969]

the truth is out there, but you have to earn it. it does not come to you through reading just one book.

[bfgoodrik]

I mean tangible evidence, outside from the bible. If not stfu.

[bfgoodrik]

Obviously, you don't know the truth.

[bfgoodrik]

"God created the universe thru the big bang so called theory. God position the earth to where it neithers bake or freeze. God formed this miraclous machine we call our body. Science has it's place. But God, the creator is the place"

Can you present evidence for this claim?

[bfgoodrik]

Thank you for sharing your utter stupidity, nobody wants the blind leading the blind so how can you be a guide? You seem so deep in delusions of grandeur that you cant even realize that everything to do with your everyday life no matter what has to do with science. You like everyone else on this planet

lives depend on science.

[rednecktrucker1969]

you go! that's kinda the idea. :)

[bfgoodrik]

Thank you sir!

[thatgaybloke]

I enjoyed that. I watched the other guy's video open mouthed where he mentioned atheists cherry picking from the bible. As for the advice that atheists should try reading the bible - ditto, Christians, ditto.

[rednecktrucker1969]

oh the new one I just uploaded is far better. :) this is too easy.

[rednecktrucker1969]

How is learning a bad thing, EVER? Wow, if you really feel this way, then you are too far gone for anyones's help. You cannot be saved.

[rednecktrucker1969]

After I rip apart you next video, I will be sure to do that. Thank kindly for the advice. I never meant to lie or decieve anyone, just spread the truth. :)

[rednecktrucker1969]

Threats only work on the weak minded. Hate is not a family value....oh wait, it is in the bible, and since that is where you get YOUR morals from, we cannot expect better of you.

[DistinctiveBlend]

"You atheist do too much research and not enough praying"

lol, thanks for the laugh.

[RarianRakista]

@DistinctiveBlend Apparently they have never seen a grad student outside his advisors office with his hands clasped in prayer.

[gremlinn7]

In your video you asserted that most atheists don't believe in God just because they haven't done the research.

It's most interesting that the only person who would say this is someone who hasn't done the research by listening to a lot of atheists.

[damedallydoo]

I used to believe in life after death and Jesus, but I no longer do. It hasn't made me any less happy either. I'm still trying to educate myself a little about science even though I find some of it a little heavy for my taste. Nevertheless, what I have read has been fascinating and makes the universe a much more interesting place than any religious world view.

[LithodidMan]

Great video, 5 stars and sub!

[rednecktrucker1969]

Thanks very much, I really do appreciate it!

[kalsolarUK]

very well said sir!

[rednecktrucker1969]

I never claimed to be looking at your video as i was making mine. I actually wrote out my thoughts and was reading them off of the screen.

[LogicalSanity]

Thanks for this video. His video gave me lots of facepalms

[bkstudio1990]

Oh ok, other than that truth stuff it is nonsense, what did he lie about? I saw

nothing that could be taken as a lie.

[bkstudio1990]

wrong, he's trying to show what your problems are(ignoring the obvios lie you just told in you last video) are equivalent to the ones you presented

[sarin2531]

Kaz owned (not surprisingly) once again. Nice job.

[DarkTheAtheist]

Very well done my friend.

[homerphobe]

Liked the way you turned his arguments around on him. Very good!!1