im starting to get pissed off. an f1 car has a better 0-60 than a bugatti and a top speed of the bugatti and is 20 seconds faster on the top gear track. show a real f1 car with a driver that isnt a 36 year old virgin and ill be impressed
@hiyoitsmehamza u dont even get it dude. an f1 car does 0-300kph in 8.6 seconds. bugatti does it in 12. f1 car has a top speed of over 420kph, the bugatti veyron super sport only beats it in top speed, nothing else. meaning the f1 wins 2 out of 3. making it majority rules. its faster to every speed, except to 260mph because it cant reach that
@hiyoitsmehamza Veyron faster than a F1 ? What you mean ? maybe in a straight with 5km .... coz, if you think a lili bit, in any track (straights, corners, etc) a F1 is gonna beat either a Veyron or any other car.
However, you have to consider that ... in straights, a Dragster is gonna beat the Veyron ... so, your statement is totally pointless.
@Tyler83Mr well a dragster has a jet engine and its not road legal. an f1 car gearbox only lasts one day a veyron lasts many years. an f1 car is designed for one day a veyron is designed for ever
Looks like an Jos Verstappen Arrows f1 car but definetly not the real deal.. Must be a replica in my oppinion. You can tell by the tires, rims, scoop over drivers head, and by the lines of the car on the side. unless they have done major changes to the car so it will perform well in a drag race but shit on the track. Wich i SERIOUSLY doubt...
@coolL9457 You're the Idiot here. Does it sound like a F1 to you? Does those rims look like F1 rims to you. This is a F2000 or F3000....I guess you don't know anything about F1 cars.
The driver is Johan Rajamaki from Sweden. This video is taking from DHB (Danmark Hurtigste Bil, Denmark's fastest car) 03 i think, on Padborg Park. And it's a F1 car. It's not with pattel shift because they use the car for courses. I know the owner of the car, personal.
the engines used to be bigger back then, but once there was a time when they had turbo charged engines in f1 cars.. things change, THIS car still was a f1 car..
no it's not an f1 car, it uses an Arrows livery but it's not the 2000 car, the design seems old, and it doesn't seem an F1 design anyway.. the engine cover is too small, so it's not even equipped with an F1 official engine, the nose is too low, and the rear wing is too small.. this doesn't even classifies as a gp 2 car
it's not a F1 car. there is a difference between open wheel race cars. that was merely a 4 cyl formula ford or mazda. f1 cars has more aero parts and engine is a screaming 20000 rpm v8
well they had to decrease the power of the engines in f1 cause they were goin thru too many engines cause of overheating and they wouldnt last the whole race or weekend ...so im still stickin with my 2.5s 0-60 mph for the most part.
UGH... shut up.... supra has nothing on either of these... these are both stock (and of course an f1 isnt stock)... your STOCK supra has nothing on this
how old r u? r u trying to say F1 could smoke supra on 1/4 miles? LAugh My Ass Off!!! F1 are not drag car. its just good in circuit track run. not other.
r u fuckin dumb look at how big the tires are...theres a reason for that... by the time the supra will hook the quarter mile is gonna be over with regardless of how much power it has.
yo dont talk about highly modified cars u dumb fuck...im talkin about either the n/a or the twin turbo supras cause thats how they came out of the factory...u can build any car to beat another car...so use all the stock specs when ur proving a fuckin point...dont start tellin me oh im gonna put in 3000 HP and call it a supra...its a whole different monster now...
it is a diablo vt,a buddy og my father have one and when he takes of it's much faster as you said,but the guys driving could have been much better,idiots driving
looks like seb bourdais helmet so it could be him, but the colours are the wrong way round. Plus he did test for Arrows F1 and this looks like a junior Arrows team from F3000
shit driver, traction control galore
DanglyUK 3 months ago
press 4 for laugh!
877kori 3 months ago
DAMNIT thats not an F1!
SuperBerns333 3 months ago
ptmm x q no acen una ntre el bugati y un F1pzzz esoo es lo ke kiero verr
derecs678 4 months ago
Back in the old days f1 car had more HP like 1000hp but now its very low but its still fast as Hell
kkrosskk 4 months ago
@kkrosskk no they never had 1000hp, at this time they about 750hp, with Kers these days they have 800+
MrStig691 4 months ago
@MrStig691 actually they did used to have over 1000hp in the 80's.
oscarpink 3 months ago
@MrStig691 never had over 1000hp eh? I would go and do some more research mon frere
pottsy655 2 months ago
not f1 and real bad starts from both. They shouldve been screaming before lights changed.
stu1x69 5 months ago
formula lawnmower
sajzilla 5 months ago
f1??this car is a GP2
mecastix 5 months ago
That car should have sounded like this watch?v=bbCcGQXuqXw
boardernut 6 months ago
It's an Arrows, a real F1 chassis, though I'm not sure about the engine.
boardernut 6 months ago
jajaja f1 win
ShionElPendulum 7 months ago
the engine sound is not good, this formula, is not a F1.
MrBilbut 7 months ago
im starting to get pissed off. an f1 car has a better 0-60 than a bugatti and a top speed of the bugatti and is 20 seconds faster on the top gear track. show a real f1 car with a driver that isnt a 36 year old virgin and ill be impressed
goo5976 7 months ago
@goo5976 bugatti veyron ss is faster than an f1 car
hiyoitsmehamza 4 months ago
@hiyoitsmehamza omg no it isnt.
youtube.com/watch?v=zU4kaymRUJE (f1 car 0-60)
now this is the veyron, with launch control... youtube.com/watch?v=SIq7d2e3d2g&feature=related
goo5976 4 months ago
@goo5976 so the aerial atom is faster accelarting than a veyron but it isnt faster
hiyoitsmehamza 4 months ago
@hiyoitsmehamza u dont even get it dude. an f1 car does 0-300kph in 8.6 seconds. bugatti does it in 12. f1 car has a top speed of over 420kph, the bugatti veyron super sport only beats it in top speed, nothing else. meaning the f1 wins 2 out of 3. making it majority rules. its faster to every speed, except to 260mph because it cant reach that
goo5976 4 months ago
@hiyoitsmehamza Veyron faster than a F1 ? What you mean ? maybe in a straight with 5km .... coz, if you think a lili bit, in any track (straights, corners, etc) a F1 is gonna beat either a Veyron or any other car.
However, you have to consider that ... in straights, a Dragster is gonna beat the Veyron ... so, your statement is totally pointless.
Tyler83Mr 4 months ago
@Tyler83Mr well a dragster has a jet engine and its not road legal. an f1 car gearbox only lasts one day a veyron lasts many years. an f1 car is designed for one day a veyron is designed for ever
hiyoitsmehamza 4 months ago
it's from DHB
TheGnue 8 months ago
The F! wasnt even trying
dpimpchris 10 months ago
the fake ugly f1 sounded like it was dieing
TeamSt1nkyPigs 10 months ago
To all you who think this is not an F1 car, it is (or was). Damon Hill drove for this team at one point.
InsigniaGaming 11 months ago
Looks like an Jos Verstappen Arrows f1 car but definetly not the real deal.. Must be a replica in my oppinion. You can tell by the tires, rims, scoop over drivers head, and by the lines of the car on the side. unless they have done major changes to the car so it will perform well in a drag race but shit on the track. Wich i SERIOUSLY doubt...
SkittleLover1989 1 year ago
I recognized the F1 car. Yes people it's the car from team Arrow from 2000/2001 season.
SketchbookStudios1 1 year ago
for the idiots who dont kno. that is the ORIGIONAL team arrows i think year 2000 f1 car. if you dont know those facts. dont be a idiot
coolL9457 1 year ago
@coolL9457 You're the Idiot here. Does it sound like a F1 to you? Does those rims look like F1 rims to you. This is a F2000 or F3000....I guess you don't know anything about F1 cars.
VitorVitoriaBaia 1 year ago
old f2000 not f1
spencerhopkins91 1 year ago
agreed with @majicmeow
italianboy875 1 year ago
hvor fanden er det fra???
hanzithaking 1 year ago
@hanzithaking DHB
TheGnue 8 months ago
who won
MrRobbrocker 1 year ago
its an Arrows F1 car from 2001/2002 by the looks of it.
majicmeow 1 year ago
@majicmeow that's exactly what it is. The Arrows F1 car
Freniar 1 year ago
ma gliele hanno cambiate le candele alla f1?
turbo16vls 2 years ago
nice. who is this lucky holding camera on such competitions? )))
kirillvz 2 years ago
that shit sounds like something straight outa hell
Benfromlexave 2 years ago
come on! this it NOT A F1 CAR!!
dont even have to look at it to tell, just hear the engine!
nice car anyway, what is it?
davidrborquez 2 years ago
What do you think the respective power of these cars would be , and how does torque figure into f 1 type cars ?
runsthepoint2 2 years ago
@runsthepoint2
Well, peak hp is probably reached around 19000rpm, right? So, if an F1 car has, say, 700bhp, then torque should be... around 200lb/ft torque =D
FourSidedPiston 2 years ago
the F1 changes gears in like 5-6000 rpm's, lol
0235681956 2 years ago
it's an old f1 car Arrow F1
JorjoLucas 2 years ago
that's not a F1 car
NapalmCandy 2 years ago
i'll tell you why it won, it's a racing car. the lambo is street legal.
FROZYO 2 years ago
waht a bad start
thogn 2 years ago
f1 cars always start like that dumbass
MrMilkshakey 2 years ago
the arrows was a Lamborghini F1 team, isn't?
Mauricio357 2 years ago
no, that wouldnt be a good thing for lamborghini because arrows sucked hard
studiefinanciering 2 years ago
The driver is Johan Rajamaki from Sweden. This video is taking from DHB (Danmark Hurtigste Bil, Denmark's fastest car) 03 i think, on Padborg Park. And it's a F1 car. It's not with pattel shift because they use the car for courses. I know the owner of the car, personal.
5kroner 2 years ago
I would like to drive a F1 on standard road and beat all porsches ferraris hahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
techjoe040669 2 years ago
Seriously, you are not funny, seriously.
karthikbing 2 years ago
Its An Indy Car
lomborghinigallardo 2 years ago
CRAP NOT A F-1 CAR.
01221984 2 years ago
the engines used to be bigger back then, but once there was a time when they had turbo charged engines in f1 cars.. things change, THIS car still was a f1 car..
flakers1337 2 years ago
wrong, f1 is V8 and this is an old f1 car, from a poor team. arrows i think
flakers1337 2 years ago
its now way that is a f1 car...
ICUSWE 2 years ago
NOT...NOT...NOT an F1
chillybo007 2 years ago 60
Yes it is!
It s a 2000 Arrow F1 car.
josedescoteaux 2 years ago
no it's not an f1 car, it uses an Arrows livery but it's not the 2000 car, the design seems old, and it doesn't seem an F1 design anyway.. the engine cover is too small, so it's not even equipped with an F1 official engine, the nose is too low, and the rear wing is too small.. this doesn't even classifies as a gp 2 car
dario272 2 years ago 2
Looks to me as if this is an old F3000 Car from the early nineties.
Kimster1987 2 years ago
@chillybo007 agreed looks indy or f3000
shamurs 1 year ago
@chillybo007 Search for Arrows F1 2001 on Google, you'll find the car alright :)
Freniar 1 year ago
@Freniar I did, and it doesnt look anything like this... lines are all wrong, this is probarly a F3000 with a arrows F1 painting (horrible made)
xismxist 8 months ago
@chillybo007 Actually, it is, it looks like the old 97 Arrows but in the later livery.
ComradeOblivious 3 months ago
@ComradeOblivious NOT NOT NOT an F1 i repeat...NOT........
chillybo007 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@chillybo007 NOT NOT NOT an F1 i repeat...NOT........ NOT NOT NOT NOT NOOT!!!!! AN F1 CAR
lil4bugsy 4 days ago
@chillybo007 Well, what is it if its not an f1.? It looks like one..
01Toecutter 2 weeks ago
it's not a F1 car. there is a difference between open wheel race cars. that was merely a 4 cyl formula ford or mazda. f1 cars has more aero parts and engine is a screaming 20000 rpm v8
ooitzmichelle 2 years ago
Hah very true. I knew there was something wrong with the sound of the engine, didn't sound like F1 at all.
policeman1313 2 years ago
it was more 20 seconds to 60 mph what a horrible start from the f1 car
Lunarvrr 2 years ago
but i could be wrong now so...just goin with what ive seen/heard about f1 engine regulations
SirFightsalot 2 years ago
Nowadays you have 1 engine for 2 races. If they drop down the rpms, they can drive alot more
Spartan117FS 2 years ago
is it true that f1 cars have 3.0 litre engines? Naturally aspired? because that is amazing if they do
NehpetsK57 2 years ago
most bikes cant keep up with a true f1 racecar
rvngexisntxjstce 2 years ago
lol, they where not even trying...
The f1 barely reved and considering this model goes up to 28k...
Spartan117FS 2 years ago
They were, the F1 has so much torque that it wont hook, thats why he was featherin it...
InsuWolf 2 years ago
F1's accelerate from 0-60, 1,7secs.
(Older model, somewhere around 1,8-1,9)
this one wasnt even close to that goal...
Spartan117FS 2 years ago
u searched up 1.7 seconds to 60 mph? cause that seems faster then what i remember seein most of them as...it was more like 2.5 seconds
SirFightsalot 2 years ago
Your kind of outdated.
Theoretically formula 1's can accelerate to 100km/h, in 0,9 seconds. But it's not possible due to wheel size.
Depending on the setup of the car, it can accelerate from 0-100km/h, 1,7-2,2
Spartan117FS 2 years ago
well they had to decrease the power of the engines in f1 cause they were goin thru too many engines cause of overheating and they wouldnt last the whole race or weekend ...so im still stickin with my 2.5s 0-60 mph for the most part.
SirFightsalot 2 years ago
Supra would've smoke it!~~~!!~!~
messos 2 years ago
UGH... shut up.... supra has nothing on either of these... these are both stock (and of course an f1 isnt stock)... your STOCK supra has nothing on this
Dudeman9339 2 years ago
but SUPRA would've smoke em too ^^
messos 2 years ago
Not and F1 car but it still wasn't trying. Also a F1 car will smoke anything so stfu with supra's.
PaulDog9 2 years ago
how old r u? r u trying to say F1 could smoke supra on 1/4 miles? LAugh My Ass Off!!! F1 are not drag car. its just good in circuit track run. not other.
messos 2 years ago
ya it would
DarbiterM 2 years ago
r u fuckin dumb look at how big the tires are...theres a reason for that... by the time the supra will hook the quarter mile is gonna be over with regardless of how much power it has.
SirFightsalot 2 years ago
Formula 1's have an advantage, they dont need as big tyres since the cars only weights 500kg's (1000 pounds).
A lambhorgini diablo weighs around 2 tons, and has a biggger engine, so the traction is not as good.
Spartan117FS 2 years ago
what? u mean the F1 tires are big!? look at SW's Supra!! 7secs quarter mile, tires bigger than this shit. fcking stupid F1 fan. lol
messos 2 years ago
yo dont talk about highly modified cars u dumb fuck...im talkin about either the n/a or the twin turbo supras cause thats how they came out of the factory...u can build any car to beat another car...so use all the stock specs when ur proving a fuckin point...dont start tellin me oh im gonna put in 3000 HP and call it a supra...its a whole different monster now...
SirFightsalot 2 years ago
its still a Toyota Supra =D
messos 2 years ago
omg, can supra do 0-200km/h in 5secs? wel..an F1 can...
dimos47ki7 2 years ago 7
so what? r u gonna ask ur daddy purchase F1 for u? LOL
messos 2 years ago
lol, whats that got to do with the fact that an F1 car is faster than a supra?
its common sense...
dimos47ki7 2 years ago
i have no idea
messos 2 years ago
Naw GT-R would'uve beaten easy supra would hav no chance
museapex 2 years ago
but now a ENZO on the other hand can and will smoke a lambo and a supra againt the f1? umm theres a 50 50 chance
26sep96 2 years ago
yea i dont think thats a diablo cuz it would have been faster than that, the F1 would still win tho
andoneballers 3 years ago
it is a diablo vt,a buddy og my father have one and when he takes of it's much faster as you said,but the guys driving could have been much better,idiots driving
atvbuilder93 3 years ago
Beat tht shit jajaja.
Bandolero0826 3 years ago
F1 is so loud you cant even hear the Lambo....lol F1 is so amazing!!
barchetta575m 3 years ago
are you shure it is a diablo it looks like a murciealgo or gallardo
FemoCrew303 3 years ago
os that a normal enginesound? its sound bad...
justlovealesana 3 years ago
Stupid versus .... ¬¬
balar369 3 years ago
damn dude in the f1 knew he was goin to roll the lambo up and smoke it lol he ket him have a head start and still dusted him
NickThaDick696969 3 years ago
if the f1 driver hit the gas he wouldve did a burnout down the whole track
paul1495 3 years ago
no traction what so ever, he couldnt rev the car even in higher gears.
tafka100 3 years ago
That is an Arrows F1 car from 1994!!
welshlad6 3 years ago
arrows werent orange in 94
dienkonig33 3 years ago
that is not from 94
Lazyguitar84 3 years ago
I doubt it had a perfect launch.The car sounded weak and unlively. Yucks!What a way to treat an open-wheel racing car.
BMWrocksalltheway 3 years ago
looks like seb bourdais helmet so it could be him, but the colours are the wrong way round. Plus he did test for Arrows F1 and this looks like a junior Arrows team from F3000
vortex245 4 years ago
That was not an F1.
It's a car from a (former?) F3000/GP2 team related to the F1 team.
berelul 4 years ago 4
For real.
Formula 1 car would have deafened you.
alexwilsonNC 3 years ago 20
@alexwilsonNC or we can call it a "downtuned" f1
cause lets face it....... a f1 in a drag race????
it would already be finished and that diablo will still be taking off
ThatTallAsianGuy401 11 months ago
yeah... you could tell he was trying to maintain traction ( F1 car)
cryptkeeper2007 4 years ago
that engine didn't sound well at all at the start...
cool vid man.
sqi8000 4 years ago
I think the formula one was holding back so he didn't lose traction from wheel spin.
elemento1991 4 years ago
Sounded like Traction control kicking in..
RobertHamilton85 3 years ago
good reference,,, who was the driver ?
ZENLOTUS 4 years ago