Added: 4 years ago
From: BartAgazzi
Views: 222,454
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (125)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • shit driver, traction control galore

  • press 4 for laugh!

  • DAMNIT thats not an F1!

  • ptmm x q no acen una ntre el bugati y un F1pzzz esoo es lo ke kiero verr

  • Back in the old days f1 car had more HP like 1000hp but now its very low but its still fast as Hell

  • @kkrosskk no they never had 1000hp, at this time they about 750hp, with Kers these days they have 800+

  • @MrStig691 actually they did used to have over 1000hp in the 80's.

  • @MrStig691 never had over 1000hp eh? I would go and do some more research mon frere

  • not f1 and real bad starts from both. They shouldve been screaming before lights changed.

  • formula lawnmower 

  • f1??this car is a GP2

  • That car should have sounded like this watch?v=bbCcGQXuqXw

  • It's an Arrows, a real F1 chassis, though I'm not sure about the engine.

  • jajaja f1 win

  • the engine sound is not good, this formula, is not a F1.

  • im starting to get pissed off. an f1 car has a better 0-60 than a bugatti and a top speed of the bugatti and is 20 seconds faster on the top gear track. show a real f1 car with a driver that isnt a 36 year old virgin and ill be impressed

  • @goo5976 bugatti veyron ss is faster than an f1 car

  • @hiyoitsmehamza omg no it isnt.

    youtube.com/watch?v=zU4kaymRUJ­E (f1 car 0-60)

    now this is the veyron, with launch control... youtube.com/watch?v=SIq7d2e3d2­g&feature=related

  • @goo5976  so the aerial atom is faster accelarting than a veyron but it isnt faster

  • @hiyoitsmehamza u dont even get it dude. an f1 car does 0-300kph in 8.6 seconds. bugatti does it in 12. f1 car has a top speed of over 420kph, the bugatti veyron super sport only beats it in top speed, nothing else. meaning the f1 wins 2 out of 3. making it majority rules. its faster to every speed, except to 260mph because it cant reach that

  • @hiyoitsmehamza Veyron faster than a F1 ? What you mean ? maybe in a straight with 5km .... coz, if you think a lili bit, in any track (straights, corners, etc) a F1 is gonna beat either a Veyron or any other car.

    However, you have to consider that ... in straights, a Dragster is gonna beat the Veyron ... so, your statement is totally pointless.

  • @Tyler83Mr well a dragster has a jet engine and its not road legal. an f1 car gearbox only lasts one day a veyron lasts many years. an f1 car is designed for one day a veyron is designed for ever

  • it's from DHB

  • The F! wasnt even trying

  • the fake ugly f1 sounded like it was dieing

  • To all you who think this is not an F1 car, it is (or was). Damon Hill drove for this team at one point.

  • Looks like an Jos Verstappen Arrows f1 car but definetly not the real deal.. Must be a replica in my oppinion. You can tell by the tires, rims, scoop over drivers head, and by the lines of the car on the side. unless they have done major changes to the car so it will perform well in a drag race but shit on the track. Wich i SERIOUSLY doubt...

  • I recognized the F1 car. Yes people it's the car from team Arrow from 2000/2001 season.

  • for the idiots who dont kno. that is the ORIGIONAL team arrows i think year 2000 f1 car. if you dont know those facts. dont be a idiot

  • @coolL9457 You're the Idiot here. Does it sound like a F1 to you? Does those rims look like F1 rims to you. This is a F2000 or F3000....I guess you don't know anything about F1 cars.

  • old f2000 not f1

  • agreed with @majicmeow

  • hvor fanden er det fra???

  • @hanzithaking DHB

  • who won

  • its an Arrows F1 car from 2001/2002 by the looks of it.

  • @majicmeow that's exactly what it is. The Arrows F1 car

  • ma gliele hanno cambiate le candele alla f1?

  • nice. who is this lucky holding camera on such competitions? )))

  • that shit sounds like something straight outa hell

  • come on! this it NOT A F1 CAR!!

    dont even have to look at it to tell, just hear the engine!

    nice car anyway, what is it?

  • What do you think the respective power of these cars would be , and how does torque figure into f 1 type cars ?

  • @runsthepoint2

    Well, peak hp is probably reached around 19000rpm, right? So, if an F1 car has, say, 700bhp, then torque should be... around 200lb/ft torque =D

  • the F1 changes gears in like 5-6000 rpm's, lol

  • it's an old f1 car Arrow F1

  • that's not a F1 car

  • i'll tell you why it won, it's a racing car. the lambo is street legal.

  • waht a bad start

  • f1 cars always start like that dumbass

  • the arrows was a Lamborghini F1 team, isn't?

  • no, that wouldnt be a good thing for lamborghini because arrows sucked hard

  • The driver is Johan Rajamaki from Sweden. This video is taking from DHB (Danmark Hurtigste Bil, Denmark's fastest car) 03 i think, on Padborg Park. And it's a F1 car. It's not with pattel shift because they use the car for courses. I know the owner of the car, personal.

  • I would like to drive a F1 on standard road and beat all porsches ferraris hahahahahahahahahahahahahahah

  • Seriously, you are not funny, seriously.

  • Its An Indy Car

  • CRAP NOT A F-1 CAR.

  • the engines used to be bigger back then, but once there was a time when they had turbo charged engines in f1 cars.. things change, THIS car still was a f1 car..

  • wrong, f1 is V8 and this is an old f1 car, from a poor team. arrows i think

  • its now way that is a f1 car...

  • NOT...NOT...NOT an F1

  • Yes it is!

    It s a 2000 Arrow F1 car.

  • no it's not an f1 car, it uses an Arrows livery but it's not the 2000 car, the design seems old, and it doesn't seem an F1 design anyway.. the engine cover is too small, so it's not even equipped with an F1 official engine, the nose is too low, and the rear wing is too small.. this doesn't even classifies as a gp 2 car

  • Looks to me as if this is an old F3000 Car from the early nineties.

  • @chillybo007 agreed looks indy or f3000

  • @chillybo007 Search for Arrows F1 2001 on Google, you'll find the car alright :)

  • @Freniar I did, and it doesnt look anything like this... lines are all wrong, this is probarly a F3000 with a arrows F1 painting (horrible made)

  • @chillybo007 Actually, it is, it looks like the old 97 Arrows but in the later livery.

  • @ComradeOblivious NOT NOT NOT an F1 i repeat...NOT........

  • @chillybo007 Well, what is it if its not an f1.? It looks like one..

  • it's not a F1 car. there is a difference between open wheel race cars. that was merely a 4 cyl formula ford or mazda. f1 cars has more aero parts and engine is a screaming 20000 rpm v8

  • Hah very true. I knew there was something wrong with the sound of the engine, didn't sound like F1 at all.

  • it was more 20 seconds to 60 mph what a horrible start from the f1 car

  • but i could be wrong now so...just goin with what ive seen/heard about f1 engine regulations

  • Nowadays you have 1 engine for 2 races. If they drop down the rpms, they can drive alot more

  • is it true that f1 cars have 3.0 litre engines? Naturally aspired? because that is amazing if they do

  • most bikes cant keep up with a true f1 racecar

  • lol, they where not even trying...

    The f1 barely reved and considering this model goes up to 28k...

  • They were, the F1 has so much torque that it wont hook, thats why he was featherin it...

  • F1's accelerate from 0-60, 1,7secs.

    (Older model, somewhere around 1,8-1,9)

    this one wasnt even close to that goal...

  • u searched up 1.7 seconds to 60 mph? cause that seems faster then what i remember seein most of them as...it was more like 2.5 seconds

  • Your kind of outdated.

    Theoretically formula 1's can accelerate to 100km/h, in 0,9 seconds. But it's not possible due to wheel size.

    Depending on the setup of the car, it can accelerate from 0-100km/h, 1,7-2,2

  • well they had to decrease the power of the engines in f1 cause they were goin thru too many engines cause of overheating and they wouldnt last the whole race or weekend ...so im still stickin with my 2.5s 0-60 mph for the most part.

  • Supra would've smoke it!~~~!!~!~

  • UGH... shut up.... supra has nothing on either of these... these are both stock (and of course an f1 isnt stock)... your STOCK supra has nothing on this

  • but SUPRA would've smoke em too ^^

  • Not and F1 car but it still wasn't trying. Also a F1 car will smoke anything so stfu with supra's.

  • how old r u? r u trying to say F1 could smoke supra on 1/4 miles? LAugh My Ass Off!!! F1 are not drag car. its just good in circuit track run. not other.

  • ya it would

  • r u fuckin dumb look at how big the tires are...theres a reason for that... by the time the supra will hook the quarter mile is gonna be over with regardless of how much power it has.

  • Formula 1's have an advantage, they dont need as big tyres since the cars only weights 500kg's (1000 pounds).

    A lambhorgini diablo weighs around 2 tons, and has a biggger engine, so the traction is not as good.

  • what? u mean the F1 tires are big!? look at SW's Supra!! 7secs quarter mile, tires bigger than this shit. fcking stupid F1 fan. lol

  • yo dont talk about highly modified cars u dumb fuck...im talkin about either the n/a or the twin turbo supras cause thats how they came out of the factory...u can build any car to beat another car...so use all the stock specs when ur proving a fuckin point...dont start tellin me oh im gonna put in 3000 HP and call it a supra...its a whole different monster now...

  • its still a Toyota Supra =D

  • omg, can supra do 0-200km/h in 5secs? wel..an F1 can...

  • so what? r u gonna ask ur daddy purchase F1 for u? LOL

  • lol, whats that got to do with the fact that an F1 car is faster than a supra?

    its common sense...

  • i have no idea

  • Naw GT-R would'uve beaten easy supra would hav no chance

  • but now a ENZO on the other hand can and will smoke a lambo and a supra againt the f1? umm theres a 50 50 chance

  • yea i dont think thats a diablo cuz it would have been faster than that, the F1 would still win tho

  • it is a diablo vt,a buddy og my father have one and when he takes of it's much faster as you said,but the guys driving could have been much better,idiots driving

  • Beat tht shit jajaja.

  • F1 is so loud you cant even hear the Lambo....lol F1 is so amazing!!

  • are you shure it is a diablo it looks like a murciealgo or gallardo

  • os that a normal enginesound? its sound bad...

  • Stupid versus .... ¬¬

  • damn dude in the f1 knew he was goin to roll the lambo up and smoke it lol he ket him have a head start and still dusted him

  • if the f1 driver hit the gas he wouldve did a burnout down the whole track

  • no traction what so ever, he couldnt rev the car even in higher gears.

  • That is an Arrows F1 car from 1994!!

  • arrows werent orange in 94

  • that is not from 94

  • I doubt it had a perfect launch.The car sounded weak and unlively. Yucks!What a way to treat an open-wheel racing car.

  • looks like seb bourdais helmet so it could be him, but the colours are the wrong way round. Plus he did test for Arrows F1 and this looks like a junior Arrows team from F3000

  • That was not an F1.

    It's a car from a (former?) F3000/GP2 team related to the F1 team.

  • For real.

    Formula 1 car would have deafened you.

  • @alexwilsonNC or we can call it a "downtuned" f1

    cause lets face it....... a f1 in a drag race????

    it would already be finished and that diablo will still be taking off

  • yeah... you could tell he was trying to maintain traction ( F1 car)

  • that engine didn't sound well at all at the start...

    cool vid man.

  • I think the formula one was holding back so he didn't lose traction from wheel spin.

  • Sounded like Traction control kicking in..

  • good reference,,, who was the driver ?

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more