if u are tired of mainstream media, if u are tired of watered down news controlled by sneaky corporate elites, if u want INTERNATIONAL CURRENT EVENTS in english, then visit CHANNELEDKNOWLEDGE:ORG.. its full of interesting stories western media turns a blind eye to. i wonder why?? please subscribe by email for free updates of the news mainstream media ignores..
the right is always self serving and have always feathered their nests thought the dems do a lot of nasty stuff, ill take them any day over conservatives. conservatives are nothing but greedy loud mouthed hypocritical mudd slinging cry babies. for those of you who cant see it i imagine you have many difficulties in your lives with relationships because you dont see the truth even when it is right there in your face!!!!!
GO NEWT!!!! ACCEPTING A 1.6 MILLION DOLLAR BRIBE FROM FANNIE & FREDDIE ISN'T SO BAD AFTERALL!!!! WOOOOOOOHOOOOOOOO!!!!!!! DEATH TO AMERICAAAAA!!!!!
NOT TO MENTION BAILING OUT THE BANKERS, AND SADDLING TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS OF DEBT ON THE BACK OF COUNTLESS GENERATIONS!!!!! YAAAAA!!!! ROCK ON NEEEEWT 2012!!!!!!
OH YEAH & SITTING ON A COUCH WITH PRINCESS PELOSI AND ENDORSING THE WHOLE CARBON CREDIT CLIMATE CHANGE SCAM TO CRIPPLE OUR ECONOMY!!! WOOOOHOOOOOOO!!!! END AMERICAAAAA NOW!! VOTE NEWT!!
America is not interested in integrity and honesty. People don't want real change and RPaul is way too decent and honest to ever be President. People here want socialism and its very sad. I will write RPaul's name in and if that means Obama, then so be it. There is no difference,nothing will change and the Constitution has become a piece of paper that is laughed at. I will not vote for a snake to expell the other snake.
"Neither the wisest constitution nor the wisest laws will secure liberty and happiness of a people. The truest friend of the liberty of his country... will not suffer a man to be chosen into any office of power and trust who is not a wise and virtuous man." -Samuel Adams. I'd vote Obama over Newt ;(
Google the GOPAC MEMO and you will see Newt Gingrich's playbook on what and when to use certain words in a debate. According to Gingrich, there is a list of words that should be used to define a position or an opponant and he is using some of the words here. Don't think for one second that the truth is coming out of Gringrich's mouth. He sounds very good and he knows how to play on words in a debate, but when you get down to it, there is no substance to this man. If he is the nominee Obama wins.
RON PAUL OWNZ THE ESTABLISHMENT .. GROW UP KIDDIES AND REALIZE IT.
A VOTE FOR PAUL IS A VOTE TO RESTORE OUR CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC!!
ALL NEWT CAN DO IS DESPERATELY ACT THE OUTSIDER BY PARROTING PAUL'S TALKING POINTS LIKE A CLOWN. ANYONE WHO CAN TYPE CAN FIND OUT PAUL HAS BEEN TALKING ABOUT THE FED, AND GOLD STANDARDS, ETC ETC FOR 30+ YEARS!
Newt says he helped Reagan defeat the Soviet Union. Was that before or after he said this?
Reports BBC:
In 1985… Mr Gingrich referred to a meeting between Ronald Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev as “the most dangerous summit for the West since Adolf Hitler met with Chamberlain in 1938 at Munich”.
im not saying their wasn’t bad intel we obviously have had an abundance of that as well but you get bad intel from not having assets or bases in the area
i would how ever like to see some bases over seas closed like say bases in italy and netherlands and areas that are stable and friendly to us but in an area that is increasingly aggressive and making threats to wipe countries off the map im not for closing
and of course with the media telling the entire world what we are doing that also gives the enemy ample time to prepare for the war and its pretty obvious when an army begins to appear that a war is about to happen so having bases in those areas gives us the best weapon you can have in a war which of course is the element of surprise.
i mean insurgents not terrorist i had better be politically correct would not want to sound partisan.But of course hezbollah is a terrorist organization that sends rockets into Israel on an almost daily basis so technically im still right when i say terrorist
let me correct myself we have no evidence to my knowledge of Iran "selling" the terrorist any weapons we only have proof that they have given them money and weapons so oops given not "sold"
@robokc1985 That is a financial transaction so yes they are funding and selling to terrorists. So they did "sell" these things to them. Why is this even being talked about?
i myself was injured by an artillery shell much like the ones we have busted coming across the borders of Iran into Iraq but hey everything i know comes from the "dinner table" right lmao
How could it be so wrong to a Ron Paul supporter or even Ron Paul to say to them selves Well he is wrong on how to deal with the rest of the world why dont we rethink the foriegn policy....Look its been tried it lead to 2 world wars in which over 100 million people died 47 million in ww1 and 60 million in ww2 and if their ever is a ww3 it has the potential with nukes to exceed a billion why do you choose to over look that?
1. I form my opinion on foreign policy not on what some presidential candidate says, but on what released facts our intelligence agency's give the public. I haven't read the wikileaks document, nor do I really give a shit about them.
2. I don't see the relevance of your service in this discussion, inform me if it does.
3. Isreal implies for us to implement sanctions on them which we will.
Also Ron Pual should take a look at the man in the mirror when he says he cares about the troops because Iran has engaged our troops they have trained insurgents to fight our troops and they have sold weapons to insurgents to kill Americans soldiers Iran has been at war with the United States for half a decade now so yeah we are not going to let them get nukes.
@robokc1985 Secondly, you don't understand what covert means. We have a history of our nations covert operations, but I guess our knowledge of them now means they were never covert. You can tell how stupid you saying that sounds now.
And you most definitively have to commit to a land invasion to derive Iran from committing acts of aggression against Isreal.
What do you think we can just bomb their nuclear facilities and they'd go "oh no biggie, we won't retaliate in any way shape or form."
@robokc1985 If you apply the logic that "Iran has engaged our troops they have trained insurgents to fight our troops and they have sold weapons to insurgents to kill Americans soldiers Iran"
Then I guess you have to go to war against the United States Congress who authorized selling the Taliban weapons back in the late 70's which are used today to kill American ground troops today.
And you know what the funny thing is, you don't even know if I oppose military action against Iran.
@robokc1985 If you apply the logic that "Iran has engaged our troops they have trained insurgents to fight our troops and they have sold weapons to insurgents to kill Americans soldiers Iran"
Then I guess you have to go to war against the United States Congress who authorized selling the Taliban weapons back in the late 70's which are used today to kill American ground troops today.
And you know what the funny thing is, you don't even know if I oppose military action against Iran.
@Amadeus5150 OK right your not a ron paul supporter you just advocat his positions Have you ever heard of an efp? well i have more then heard of them i had a freind killed by one and guess who produced it and sold it to the insurgents and if you cant figure out the difference between selling weapons to the tailban to fight the russians during the cold war and a country activly funding war and terrorism agianst america and isreal then you are the dumbest mother fucker on planet earth
@robokc1985 I advocate my positions not Ron Pauls, and you don't know what my positions are because you're blindly throwing out accusations to me which have no foundation,I have heard of an EFP yes and I know people whom died to them. Don't pull that liberal moral high ground bullshit on me pal. Oh and find where I said Iran isn't funding Terrorism. Please show me, because you missed the whole point of my argument again.
And thanks for addressing NONE of my major points.
@Amadeus5150 What "points" you made a series of statements and then asked how my service in the area of discussin is relevent .....Uh are you serious that is something you think is a good question....This is what you sound like...Uh how is actuly being their and seeing it first hand important i have read things.... hmmmm whatever and Liberal moral high ground are you kidding me WTF are you talking about?
Explain how we wouldn't have to invade Iran to ensure no blowback after we bomb their nuclear facilities. Explain why Ron Paul doesn't care about Iran obtaining Nuclear weapons. Actually explain to me how Ron Paul would have the power to not obstruct Iranian nuclear weapons. Explain to me in general Ron Pauls position. Explain to me what difference it makes in this argument you being in the armed forces (you don't even know if Im in armed forces)
@Amadeus5150 well first we have boomed Iran’s facilities before with little to no blow back and any blow back from stopping Iran from getting a nuke would not be as bad as the blow back from the actual nuke if used on us or Israel. Ron Paul on day one could by himself pull every troop back to America which would destroy our ability to fight and react to aggressive action against us or allies .And im not going to write you an essay on Ron Paul and all of his positions
@robokc1985 We've never bombed their facilities directly.
And no blow back from Iran? They hate us because we installed a horrible dictator that they hated. And the tensions grow larger every time a iranian nuclear scientist magically dies from a car bomb. There is always blow back.
Pulling troops out of the middle east would not halt our ability to commence an agressive attack on Iran. Logically speaking in this day and age you can launch an agressive campaign on any nation in a shortperiod
@Amadeus5150 Well thats not really true it takes weeks and months of preperation before forces are capable of mounting an attack....Thats why we win. we plan extensivly and have resources in the area. A good example of what happens when you dont have a capablity in the area is afghanistan and osama bin laden escaping because we took to long to build up the troops and did not have enough resources in the area to trap him and kill him in Battle of Tora Bora.
@robokc1985 You don't think we have contingency plans against Iran?
And Tora Bora was not the fault of a lack of troop build up, but the intelligence from the CIA, which has been adressed over and over the past years and I think was reformed under GWB I don't remember.
@Amadeus5150 What is it you want America out of the middle east and just let them fight it out? Do you stand with Israel? Do you think they have the right to exist? Do you believe that the holocaust happened? Because the president of Iran does not and has vowed to wipe them off the map and believes that for the 12th imam to come Israel must be destroyed if we leave war will happen and also the insufficient number of troops at Tora Bora was attributed to the failure to capture osama
@robokc1985 Sure I'd leave the middle east. Sure I stand with Isreal, I have some jew in me. Yes I believe the Holocaust happened. I don't really give a shit what The Iranian batshit crazy president has said, he's not in control of the Nuclear weapons, look up the Iranian Constitution. Isreal can take care of her self, she has a history of being very efficient in taking out her enemy's when needed. Hell she has over 100 nukes.
@Amadeus5150 Well its believed that Israel has nukes but they never have declared them (they do have them probably) look id like to believe that Iran is not going to make a nuke or use a nuke and they just want peace and they are just reacting but The president in Iran is in control of the military and he is directly responsible for the nuclear program and he could and would put the bomb in the hands of the people who would use it and the Supreme Leader "Ali Khamenei" supports him
@robokc1985 But the Iranian President under there constitution doesn't have the authority to launch a nuclear strike. That relies in their general or what ever they call him over there.
@Amadeus5150 Do you really think that a country that does not even allow its people to peacefully protest is going to care what the constitution says? Ali Khamenei is the constitution pretty much and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is in charge
@robokc1985 Well if you're really saying all that then you really haven't read their constitution. Peaceful protests have nothing to do with their constitution. I mean their constitution requires gays to be publicly executed.
@Amadeus5150 The American Constitution doesn’t even stop our government from doing things that should be unconstitutional but some how Iran’s is iron clad? hmmm i know your smarter than that.
@robokc1985 Sure but you're basing your whole claim that Iran will launch nuclear weapons because their leader is a madman, when he doesn't have the authorization to do so under the way their government functions. Whether they follow that authorization, I don't know, he's not a very well liked leader among his own forces.
@Amadeus5150 im basing my claims off of my personal knowledge of the region and people that live their history and what has proven to work along with what i consider to be common sense all be it not so common any more.
@Amadeus5150 it was attributed to insufficient numbers of troops at Tora Bora which is why so many of the al-Qaeda fighters were able to escape bad intel played a role but the lack of troops is what caused them to be able to escape
@robokc1985 Sure, but the sort of Intel that was required to prevent Osama Bin Laden from escaping didn't require ground forces. He escaped because we thought the Pakistani's had their border guarded. Thats not the job of the ground forces to obtain said intel.
@Amadeus5150 uh actualy one of the main jobs of ground forces is to collect intel and if we had more ground forces in the area we would have had more intel on enemy movement.
@robokc1985 You didn't read what I said. I didn't say ground forces have no business collecting Intel, I said that specific type of intel was the responsibility of our various intelligence departments.
Though, you preface your argument with we should have had more forces stationed there, not more forces at the battle it self. Unless Im reading what you're saying wrong.
@Amadeus5150 well you didn’t read what i said because i did not say that. you said ground forces were not responsible for collecting that kind of Intel and that is exactly part of what their responsibility is and it was a lack of troops that was attributed to osama getting away along with many al qaeda leaders.
@robokc1985 Its not the responsibility of ground forces to obtain intel such as that. That's basic fucking intel that our various other intelligence eat for fucking breakfast. Putting ground forces there in the first place to obtain the intel would have compromised the operation.
@Amadeus5150 if you looked you would find information about it and the escape of Al qaeda forces from that battle was directly attributed to a lack of ground forces in the area The CIA has said this the pentagon has said this the general in charge of the operation has said this and he had requested more troops and was refused so im guessing your just hard headed and obviously you want to be right so bad even when your wrong it blinds you from seeing the truth
@robokc1985 You know I've never once said that the sole reason for his escape was the lack of intel, if I did then go find quote and I'll admit that was wrongt. I've read into it alot before, and I know about the various reasons why we didn't capture him. One of them being that CIA dude requesting more ground troops and pentagons refusal. I acknowledge that. But I was on the argument of the responsibility of ground troops to obtain that said intel, not Bin Laden.
@robokc1985 Liberal moral high ground? Do I have to spell it out? it implies the usage and manipulation of emotions to further your position of the debate. It's a common political tactic, the democrats use "poor people", and the republicans use the "troops".
Also, you use the experience argument, yet I can use it against you. What about the head of Mossad? He disagrees with you, and he has for more experience then you. I guess he's wrong.
@robokc1985 And it's funny because down to the core of it, you haven't adressed the core of the argument, which was you don't know what Ron Pauls positions are beyond what you've seen on televison. I may be wrong, but Im willing to be money you haven't looked at hit voting record, or any of the candidates voting record.
Can you tell me which is the most conservative member of the candidates?
Hint hint look up Is john kerry a liberal and scroll down to the bottom of the list.
@Amadeus5150 im just going to skip to your conservative question well i would say that newt is the most conservative on what he has "done" but sanatorium is the most conservative on what he "believes" and i would vote for either of them gladly but their is no way in hell im going to be pro romney or ron paul bacuase of either what they say or do. if romney wins the nomination i will be taking a real hard look at wth has happened to my party and ron paul has no chance so no worries
@robokc1985 Why not answer all the questions? And please don't give the cop out "bcuz they r stupid lol".
If you had looked up Is john kerry a liberal on google, you would have found a study conducted that showed the most liberal and the most conservative members of the United States Congress. it gauges this by seeing how fiscally and socially conservative their voting record is. Guess who came at number 1?
Ron Paul.
And why would you vote for someone who voted for medicare part d?
And before anyone opens their mouth about NAFTA. NAFTA was the work of the Bush, Sr. administration and passed during the Clinton administration by the Republicans.
I have come to the conclusion that the Republican Party has become nothing more than a side show filled with a bunch of Carnival Barkers shouting out the same insults, character assasinations and entertaining comments for the sake of winning over the idiots that believe in them. These candidates are nothing more than cartoons.
@IngloriusBastard11 You talk about the republicans as if they are the only ones guilty of character assassination slimy politics. When you look at modern american politics from such a thin viewpoint you're only fueling partisan politicians to further the depression of american values which include life liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
Outsourcing isn't the causation of free-trade. Paul Krugman can educate you on this.
And you defend Clinton by saying it was a republican bill, which is true, but Clinton as well as Al Gore and most of his staff supported it and support it to this day.
When are the American people going to realize that this has nothing to do with Republicans gaining control of the Government. This is all about how these people can gain control of the Office of the Presidency and milk the taxpayer for their own purposes, the security of their OWN families and friends, and create a networking organization for the future of their own children and grandchildren. It's nothing more than trying to gain as much power as possible for the sake of increasing their wealth
If these people believe in Capitalism why were so many jobs Outsourced during their reign of incompentency and stupidity? Why, under the Republicans, were so many good jobs eliminated? Why under the Republican administration were regulations that protected the American people eliminated? Why under the Republicans were companies allowed to pay lower taxes, export jobs and essentially toss the American workers under the bus? Why under the Republicans did we go into so much debt and chaos?
How in the hell does anyone allow a person like Gingwich to even contemplate running for office after what he did during his position as Speaker of the House. The hypocrisy was massive, the lies were abundant and the deception was rampant. How the hell does the American populace fall for this time, after time, after time.
These are the same types of people who put us into this mess because they had control of the Congress and the White House and broke the back of the Unions and middle class.
the difference between Russia and Iran is that Russia during the cold war lacked religion and wanted to live Iran which has a strong element of radical Islam that is in control wants to wipe Israel off the map and would use nuclear weapons in order to as they believe create the environment that is necessary for the 12th imam to come back and set the world as they see it right and destroy the infidels.
@KingOCleveland Part 1 Well something Ron Pual supporters either dont know or have forgotten or just dont care about is that the very policies that Ron Paul is for are the same ones we had pre WWII and caused us not to act when hitler invaded country after country or when Japan invaded China. Its those policies that lead to 60 MILLION people world wide being killed and is why we now do something when a country begins to threatin our saftey
all of these guys are basicly the same. newt scares me with his "covert ops, we can kill iranian scientists destory their facilities, all of it deniable" talk. mitt is a corperate robot that only does the bidding of his massive super pac. obama doesnt know how to run the country. ron paul is the only choice. i'd love to stay in the middle east protecting our interests and defeating our enemies, but we just dont have the danm money anymore! its no longer financialy viable to occupy the midle east
the only speaker IN HISTORY to be fined 300,000.00 for ethics violations.....come on are you f***king kidding me....wake up America...if you don't just go back to sleep and when you wake up your childern will be jobless and homeless....VOTE RON PAUL 2012!!
@mrsupercoolism: Just look at Newt. Is it me or would you trust Newt Gingrich to be alone with your little children? Just look at him if a picture of him were to pop up on the news tomorrow as the new Sandusky, would you be surprised? Newt just looks like a dirty old man to me.
and if you are a Ron Paul supporter then you should’t be to concerned about morality because Ron Paul is just fine with Iran getting a nuclear weapon that would most likely be used on Israel or us and would kill millions of people so whatever.
@robokc1985 He's actually said and I quote "Im not fine with Iran getting nuclear weapons". However he has said he won't however commit an act of aggression against Iran, which is the accusation you should be attacking, not the figment of your imagination which is he doesn't care.
@robokc1985 So you admit you're political knowledge only exteneds from dinner table conversations. It's clear you have a lack of knowledge towards external affairs, 1. We have been for many years covertly hindering their performance. A Paul presidency wouldn't be able to halt CIA operations or any other covert operations. Two, the CIA's own documents have stated they won't be obtaining them for another 2 years. 3. Isreal intelligence have warn ed against an invasion of Iran.
@Amadeus5150 Uh WTH are you talking about crazy person 1. Its not covert if you know about it soooo apparently its not covert. 2. I know things from my OWN SERVICE IN The REGION that you obviously don’t know but some of it you can find in the wikileaked documents. 3. Israel has been asking for us to take a tougher stance on Iran. And who the hell is talking about invasion you don’t have to invade a country to stop them from getting nukes Gah Ron Paul supporters lack creative thought
@robokc1985 Im not a Ron Paul Supporter you partisan fuckass.
1. I form my opinion on foreign policy not on what some presidential candidate says, but on what released facts our intelligence agency's give the public. I haven't read the wikileaks document, nor do I really give a shit about them.
2. I don't see the relevance of your service in this discussion, inform me if it does.
3. Isreal implies for us to implement sanctions on them which we will.
@robokc1985 Im not a Ron Paul Supporter you partisan fuckass.
1. I form my opinion on foreign policy not on what some presidential candidate says, but on what released facts our intelligence agency's give the public. I haven't read the wikileaks document, nor do I really give a shit about them.
2. I don't see the relevance of your service in this discussion, inform me if it does.
3. Isreal implies for us to implement sanctions on them which we will.
@Amadeus5150 You call me partisan hmm Yeah i guess i am "partisan" which is because i actually believe in something and im not willing to compromise my beliefs so if you don’t like the partisan environment here is a suggestion you give up everything you believe and join us else wise quit bitching about it your part of it to dumb ass.
@robokc1985 I call you partisan because you are partisan, and thats all your intellect allows you to be, is a partisan tool for the republican party. You don't look a policy on the basis of whether or not it's beneficial to american people, but if it agrees with the party's basic outlook. You're the same as democrats and you don't even see it. You're always right and they're always wrong. That's how it always is.
Partisan doesn't mean compromising your core values, just letting you know.
@Amadeus5150 And now who is drawing conclusions tool for the republican party who says i agree 100% with the republicans or even 90% i agree with ron paul on almost as many things as i disagree with him on and really the democrats are alomst always wrong i really cant think of anything that demorcarts stand for that i like so yeah i vote republican
@Amadeus5150 yeah im partisan i don’t compromise my beliefs i didn’t say i was a partisan republican im more of a libertarian but i don’t agree with how far they take it in many cases or the libertarian parties current pro choices stance
@robokc1985 You said and I quote "really the democrats are alomst always wrong". What ever you call your self, a republican, conservative, libertarian, you're partisan alone from that statement.
@robokc1985 Im not a Ron Paul Supporter you partisan fuckass.
1. I form my opinion on foreign policy not on what some presidential candidate says, but on what released facts our intelligence agency's give the public. I haven't read the wikileaks document, nor do I really give a shit about them.
2. I don't see the relevance of your service in this discussion, inform me if it does.
3. Isreal implies for us to implement sanctions on them which we will.
1. I form my opinion on foreign policy not on what some presidential candidate says, but on what released facts our intelligence agency's give the public. I haven't read the wikileaks document, nor do I really give a shit about them.
2. I don't see the relevance of your service in this discussion, inform me if it does.
3. Isreal implies for us to implement sanctions on them which we will.
1. I form my opinion on foreign policy not on what some presidential candidate says, but on what released facts our intelligence agency's give the public. I haven't read the wikileaks document, nor do I really give a shit about them.
2. I don't see the relevance of your service in this discussion, inform me if it does.
3. Isreal implies for us to implement sanctions on them which we will.
1. I form my opinion on foreign policy not on what some presidential candidate says, but on what released facts our intelligence agency's give the public. I haven't read the wikileaks document, nor do I really give a shit about them.
2. I don't see the relevance of your service in this discussion, inform me if it does.
3. Isreal implies for us to implement sanctions on them which we will.
1. I form my opinion on foreign policy not on what some presidential candidate says, but on what released facts our intelligence agency's give the public. I haven't read the wikileaks document, nor do I really give a shit about them.
2. I don't see the relevance of your service in this discussion, inform me if it does.
3. Isreal implies for us to implement sanctions on them which we will.
1. I form my opinion on foreign policy not on what some presidential candidate says, but on what released facts our intelligence agency's give the public. I haven't read the wikileaks document, nor do I really give a shit about them.
2. I don't see the relevance of your service in this discussion, inform me if it does.
3. Isreal implies for us to implement sanctions on them which we will.
@robokc1985 its the ignorant statements like that that make it possible for blood sucking politicians to keep us at war and make millions from it. its our hoorible foreign policy that makes iran and the middle east and alot of the world hate us, and your solution is to contiue that policy? did you know that pakistan has nukes? they havnt used them. the soviets had 40,000, they didnt use them. we need to get out of the middle east ande mind our own danm buisness.
@KingOCleveland Yes i know pakistan has nukes and so does india pakistan got nukes in response to india having nukes and the war they had over a border dispute The difference being that Irans president believes that Isreal must be wiped off the map for the 12th imam to return and that america is the Great satan they believe that it is their sacret duty to kill infadels and guess who that is and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad the president of Iran has said he wants to wipe isreal off the map
"The system of government you fashioned, including the principles on which you based it, is increasingly obsolete, and hence increasingly, if inadvertently, oppressive and dangerous to our welfare. It must be radically changed and a new system of government invented---a democracy for the 21st century."
economics newt is the 2nd best but he still does completely get rid of the federal reserve and any company with that kind of power will destroy our economy. also he is a chicken hawk lets face it he supports the wars and he hasn't gone, or how about him saying our founding fathers would have supported the drug war when George Washington grew ans smoke cannabis hemp on his farm. really hes hitting around .120 at this point and he doesn't even have family values he lefts his dying wife DICK!!!!!
From 11 min. and on is spot on. Newt would cream Bummer in a debate. The media know that, that's why they are pushing Romney. He is weaker and that gives Bummer a better shot. With Newt as the nominee, The president doesn't have a chance.
Mitt and Newt. Newt and Mitt. Hell, Newt Mitt Santorum Perry and Obama. There are differences between them all, but as a whole they all support the same thing. Now Ron Paul on the other hand, that's a disciplined man of integrity and intelligence. The rest of these tools are empty suits. Besides some being able to speak more eloquently than others, they're all the same. They are all the same, wake up!!!
In the near future people won't be able to speak against the NWO. Do you guys realize on DEC 31 2011 the NDAA, National Defense Authorization Act was PASSED!! Do you guys realize if we do nothing just like DEC 31, SOPA stop online piracy act on JAN 24 2012 will PASS TOO!! If we don't do something now, do you have any idea what the near future will look like? We can either do something now or sit back and watch as WE ALL BECOME SLAVES!! Is this the CHANGE you people want? RON PAUL 2012!!!
I hear this man has said he's been there all along? Why didn't he do something? W.T.F? I checked in to be lied to again, I find it difficult to get out-n-about without a lie or two to get me back into the swing of things. If you know what I mean.
serial hypocrisy..... The only real conservative is Dr. Ron Paul. The only choice for Liberty is Congressman Ron Paul! Wake up America! If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck guess what? its prob a fucking duck!
Zachary, Never heard of him? Geesh, Hes been around probably longer than anyone on this panel... He Has Experience and he worked with Reagan.and was speaker of the house..Ob viously Zach doesnt know anything about politics or knows what he is talking about. One of those who goes to the polls with a blind fold on and points and marks his ballot...Get some education before you make a statement.
@maymaytay1 You're obviously responding to the wrong person. karenpato1 is the one who is saying he's never heard of him. I obviously agree with you, Newt has been in Congress for 20 years.
Why does Newt keep bringing up fuckin Reagen???....it's not like he fuckin knew him.....Newt's a 90's man, not 80's.....who the fuck ever heard of Gingrich in the 80's???
The only reason why people knew of him in the 90's is because he was always trying to bring down Clinton.....Reagen sucked, OK Newt !!!..He sold arms to Iran, he should have been hanged as a traitor!!!....He thinks because Reagen's been dead a few years and president over 20 years ago...that nobody remembers what an ass he was.
@karenpato1 Newt served in the House from 1979-1999. Reagan was President from 1981-1989. So yes, he did know him.
Also, Reagan inherited a recession and turned it around without blaming Carter, unlike how Obama is blaming Bush today. He also won 49 states in reelection in 1984 against Mondale. Reagan sucked? Really?
if u are tired of mainstream media, if u are tired of watered down news controlled by sneaky corporate elites, if u want INTERNATIONAL CURRENT EVENTS in english, then visit CHANNELEDKNOWLEDGE:ORG.. its full of interesting stories western media turns a blind eye to. i wonder why?? please subscribe by email for free updates of the news mainstream media ignores..
ChanneledKnowledge 1 month ago
the right is always self serving and have always feathered their nests thought the dems do a lot of nasty stuff, ill take them any day over conservatives. conservatives are nothing but greedy loud mouthed hypocritical mudd slinging cry babies. for those of you who cant see it i imagine you have many difficulties in your lives with relationships because you dont see the truth even when it is right there in your face!!!!!
smoothjill09 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Newt you make me wanna throw up you sick bastard!
MrFuckyou3535 1 month ago
Please youtube Chinese in Texas click on the first video
briandjoyce 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GO NEWT!!!! ACCEPTING A 1.6 MILLION DOLLAR BRIBE FROM FANNIE & FREDDIE ISN'T SO BAD AFTERALL!!!! WOOOOOOOHOOOOOOOO!!!!!!! DEATH TO AMERICAAAAA!!!!!
NOT TO MENTION BAILING OUT THE BANKERS, AND SADDLING TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS OF DEBT ON THE BACK OF COUNTLESS GENERATIONS!!!!! YAAAAA!!!! ROCK ON NEEEEWT 2012!!!!!!
OH YEAH & SITTING ON A COUCH WITH PRINCESS PELOSI AND ENDORSING THE WHOLE CARBON CREDIT CLIMATE CHANGE SCAM TO CRIPPLE OUR ECONOMY!!! WOOOOHOOOOOOO!!!! END AMERICAAAAA NOW!! VOTE NEWT!!
LIBERTYALONE 1 month ago
America is not interested in integrity and honesty. People don't want real change and RPaul is way too decent and honest to ever be President. People here want socialism and its very sad. I will write RPaul's name in and if that means Obama, then so be it. There is no difference,nothing will change and the Constitution has become a piece of paper that is laughed at. I will not vote for a snake to expell the other snake.
sissumghy 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Newt gingrich will be our next president, why? Because Chuck Norris said so! LOL
bostinlagga1 1 month ago
Ron Paul is the wrong way!
bostinlagga1 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I'm Democrat but if it comes down to Ron Paul v.s Obama
F*** Obama !!! I'm Voting for RON PAUL !!!
thisismewhy 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Neither the wisest constitution nor the wisest laws will secure liberty and happiness of a people. The truest friend of the liberty of his country... will not suffer a man to be chosen into any office of power and trust who is not a wise and virtuous man." -Samuel Adams. I'd vote Obama over Newt ;(
LifeFortuneHonor 1 month ago
RON PAUL IS THE ONLY WAY
Nelsonpro93 1 month ago
slime
patarfuyfuy 1 month ago
RON PAUL!!!!!!
sugarsugar926 1 month ago
Google the GOPAC MEMO and you will see Newt Gingrich's playbook on what and when to use certain words in a debate. According to Gingrich, there is a list of words that should be used to define a position or an opponant and he is using some of the words here. Don't think for one second that the truth is coming out of Gringrich's mouth. He sounds very good and he knows how to play on words in a debate, but when you get down to it, there is no substance to this man. If he is the nominee Obama wins.
marellamofo 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Do not be afraid to be free.
Ring the Liberty Bell.
Vote for Ron Paul 2012
PS: Fight SOPA
drac060 1 month ago
GO RON PAUL!!!!!!!
MRjimmy958 1 month ago
Cant trust this man.
MrBabujani1 1 month ago
Please search this video:
Pathology of Newt Gingrich
RespectLoveOpenMind 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
RON PAUL 4 PRESIDENT PEOPLE!!!! LOOK HIM UP!!! You'll be glad you did.
TheEllampalli 1 month ago
If he's elected how are we to refer to him? "President Hypocrite"? "President Shitheel"?
willbond 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
RON PAUL OWNZ THE ESTABLISHMENT .. GROW UP KIDDIES AND REALIZE IT.
A VOTE FOR PAUL IS A VOTE TO RESTORE OUR CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC!!
ALL NEWT CAN DO IS DESPERATELY ACT THE OUTSIDER BY PARROTING PAUL'S TALKING POINTS LIKE A CLOWN. ANYONE WHO CAN TYPE CAN FIND OUT PAUL HAS BEEN TALKING ABOUT THE FED, AND GOLD STANDARDS, ETC ETC FOR 30+ YEARS!
LIBERTYALONE 1 month ago
Newt says he helped Reagan defeat the Soviet Union. Was that before or after he said this?
Reports BBC:
In 1985… Mr Gingrich referred to a meeting between Ronald Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev as “the most dangerous summit for the West since Adolf Hitler met with Chamberlain in 1938 at Munich”.
yougottabekiddinmee 1 month ago
im not saying their wasn’t bad intel we obviously have had an abundance of that as well but you get bad intel from not having assets or bases in the area
robokc1985 1 month ago
i would how ever like to see some bases over seas closed like say bases in italy and netherlands and areas that are stable and friendly to us but in an area that is increasingly aggressive and making threats to wipe countries off the map im not for closing
robokc1985 1 month ago
and of course with the media telling the entire world what we are doing that also gives the enemy ample time to prepare for the war and its pretty obvious when an army begins to appear that a war is about to happen so having bases in those areas gives us the best weapon you can have in a war which of course is the element of surprise.
robokc1985 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hypocrite scum. Abandoned his wife with cancer and then cheated on his second wife.
Go Santorvm! For an America with values!
IllyaConstant 1 month ago
choice*
and yes i know ron paul is pro life but that is not the current stance of the libertarian party
robokc1985 1 month ago
i mean insurgents not terrorist i had better be politically correct would not want to sound partisan.But of course hezbollah is a terrorist organization that sends rockets into Israel on an almost daily basis so technically im still right when i say terrorist
robokc1985 1 month ago
let me correct myself we have no evidence to my knowledge of Iran "selling" the terrorist any weapons we only have proof that they have given them money and weapons so oops given not "sold"
robokc1985 1 month ago
@robokc1985 That is a financial transaction so yes they are funding and selling to terrorists. So they did "sell" these things to them. Why is this even being talked about?
Amadeus5150 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i myself was injured by an artillery shell much like the ones we have busted coming across the borders of Iran into Iraq but hey everything i know comes from the "dinner table" right lmao
robokc1985 1 month ago
Comment removed
robokc1985 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
How could it be so wrong to a Ron Paul supporter or even Ron Paul to say to them selves Well he is wrong on how to deal with the rest of the world why dont we rethink the foriegn policy....Look its been tried it lead to 2 world wars in which over 100 million people died 47 million in ww1 and 60 million in ww2 and if their ever is a ww3 it has the potential with nukes to exceed a billion why do you choose to over look that?
robokc1985 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@robokc1985 @robokc1985 Im not a Ron Paul Supporter you partisan fuckass.
1. I form my opinion on foreign policy not on what some presidential candidate says, but on what released facts our intelligence agency's give the public. I haven't read the wikileaks document, nor do I really give a shit about them.
2. I don't see the relevance of your service in this discussion, inform me if it does.
3. Isreal implies for us to implement sanctions on them which we will.
Amadeus5150 1 month ago
Also Ron Pual should take a look at the man in the mirror when he says he cares about the troops because Iran has engaged our troops they have trained insurgents to fight our troops and they have sold weapons to insurgents to kill Americans soldiers Iran has been at war with the United States for half a decade now so yeah we are not going to let them get nukes.
robokc1985 1 month ago
Comment removed
Amadeus5150 1 month ago
Comment removed
Amadeus5150 1 month ago
Comment removed
Amadeus5150 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@robokc1985 Secondly, you don't understand what covert means. We have a history of our nations covert operations, but I guess our knowledge of them now means they were never covert. You can tell how stupid you saying that sounds now.
And you most definitively have to commit to a land invasion to derive Iran from committing acts of aggression against Isreal.
What do you think we can just bomb their nuclear facilities and they'd go "oh no biggie, we won't retaliate in any way shape or form."
Amadeus5150 1 month ago
@robokc1985 If you apply the logic that "Iran has engaged our troops they have trained insurgents to fight our troops and they have sold weapons to insurgents to kill Americans soldiers Iran"
Then I guess you have to go to war against the United States Congress who authorized selling the Taliban weapons back in the late 70's which are used today to kill American ground troops today.
And you know what the funny thing is, you don't even know if I oppose military action against Iran.
Amadeus5150 1 month ago
@robokc1985 If you apply the logic that "Iran has engaged our troops they have trained insurgents to fight our troops and they have sold weapons to insurgents to kill Americans soldiers Iran"
Then I guess you have to go to war against the United States Congress who authorized selling the Taliban weapons back in the late 70's which are used today to kill American ground troops today.
And you know what the funny thing is, you don't even know if I oppose military action against Iran.
Amadeus5150 1 month ago
@Amadeus5150 OK right your not a ron paul supporter you just advocat his positions Have you ever heard of an efp? well i have more then heard of them i had a freind killed by one and guess who produced it and sold it to the insurgents and if you cant figure out the difference between selling weapons to the tailban to fight the russians during the cold war and a country activly funding war and terrorism agianst america and isreal then you are the dumbest mother fucker on planet earth
robokc1985 1 month ago
@robokc1985 I advocate my positions not Ron Pauls, and you don't know what my positions are because you're blindly throwing out accusations to me which have no foundation,I have heard of an EFP yes and I know people whom died to them. Don't pull that liberal moral high ground bullshit on me pal. Oh and find where I said Iran isn't funding Terrorism. Please show me, because you missed the whole point of my argument again.
And thanks for addressing NONE of my major points.
Amadeus5150 1 month ago
@Amadeus5150 What "points" you made a series of statements and then asked how my service in the area of discussin is relevent .....Uh are you serious that is something you think is a good question....This is what you sound like...Uh how is actuly being their and seeing it first hand important i have read things.... hmmmm whatever and Liberal moral high ground are you kidding me WTF are you talking about?
robokc1985 1 month ago
@robokc1985 I'll list them for you.
Explain how we wouldn't have to invade Iran to ensure no blowback after we bomb their nuclear facilities. Explain why Ron Paul doesn't care about Iran obtaining Nuclear weapons. Actually explain to me how Ron Paul would have the power to not obstruct Iranian nuclear weapons. Explain to me in general Ron Pauls position. Explain to me what difference it makes in this argument you being in the armed forces (you don't even know if Im in armed forces)
Amadeus5150 1 month ago
@Amadeus5150 well first we have boomed Iran’s facilities before with little to no blow back and any blow back from stopping Iran from getting a nuke would not be as bad as the blow back from the actual nuke if used on us or Israel. Ron Paul on day one could by himself pull every troop back to America which would destroy our ability to fight and react to aggressive action against us or allies .And im not going to write you an essay on Ron Paul and all of his positions
robokc1985 1 month ago
@robokc1985 We've never bombed their facilities directly.
And no blow back from Iran? They hate us because we installed a horrible dictator that they hated. And the tensions grow larger every time a iranian nuclear scientist magically dies from a car bomb. There is always blow back.
Pulling troops out of the middle east would not halt our ability to commence an agressive attack on Iran. Logically speaking in this day and age you can launch an agressive campaign on any nation in a shortperiod
Amadeus5150 1 month ago
@Amadeus5150 Well thats not really true it takes weeks and months of preperation before forces are capable of mounting an attack....Thats why we win. we plan extensivly and have resources in the area. A good example of what happens when you dont have a capablity in the area is afghanistan and osama bin laden escaping because we took to long to build up the troops and did not have enough resources in the area to trap him and kill him in Battle of Tora Bora.
robokc1985 1 month ago
@robokc1985 You don't think we have contingency plans against Iran?
And Tora Bora was not the fault of a lack of troop build up, but the intelligence from the CIA, which has been adressed over and over the past years and I think was reformed under GWB I don't remember.
Amadeus5150 1 month ago
@Amadeus5150 What is it you want America out of the middle east and just let them fight it out? Do you stand with Israel? Do you think they have the right to exist? Do you believe that the holocaust happened? Because the president of Iran does not and has vowed to wipe them off the map and believes that for the 12th imam to come Israel must be destroyed if we leave war will happen and also the insufficient number of troops at Tora Bora was attributed to the failure to capture osama
robokc1985 1 month ago
@robokc1985 Sure I'd leave the middle east. Sure I stand with Isreal, I have some jew in me. Yes I believe the Holocaust happened. I don't really give a shit what The Iranian batshit crazy president has said, he's not in control of the Nuclear weapons, look up the Iranian Constitution. Isreal can take care of her self, she has a history of being very efficient in taking out her enemy's when needed. Hell she has over 100 nukes.
Amadeus5150 1 month ago
@Amadeus5150 Well its believed that Israel has nukes but they never have declared them (they do have them probably) look id like to believe that Iran is not going to make a nuke or use a nuke and they just want peace and they are just reacting but The president in Iran is in control of the military and he is directly responsible for the nuclear program and he could and would put the bomb in the hands of the people who would use it and the Supreme Leader "Ali Khamenei" supports him
robokc1985 1 month ago
@robokc1985 But the Iranian President under there constitution doesn't have the authority to launch a nuclear strike. That relies in their general or what ever they call him over there.
Amadeus5150 1 month ago
@Amadeus5150 Do you really think that a country that does not even allow its people to peacefully protest is going to care what the constitution says? Ali Khamenei is the constitution pretty much and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is in charge
robokc1985 1 month ago
@robokc1985 Well if you're really saying all that then you really haven't read their constitution. Peaceful protests have nothing to do with their constitution. I mean their constitution requires gays to be publicly executed.
Amadeus5150 1 month ago
@Amadeus5150 The American Constitution doesn’t even stop our government from doing things that should be unconstitutional but some how Iran’s is iron clad? hmmm i know your smarter than that.
robokc1985 1 month ago
@robokc1985 Sure but you're basing your whole claim that Iran will launch nuclear weapons because their leader is a madman, when he doesn't have the authorization to do so under the way their government functions. Whether they follow that authorization, I don't know, he's not a very well liked leader among his own forces.
Amadeus5150 1 month ago
@Amadeus5150 im basing my claims off of my personal knowledge of the region and people that live their history and what has proven to work along with what i consider to be common sense all be it not so common any more.
robokc1985 1 month ago
@robokc1985 And yes Osama escaping was the fault of faulty intelligence, not the seal teams that were on the ground.
Amadeus5150 1 month ago
@Amadeus5150 it was attributed to insufficient numbers of troops at Tora Bora which is why so many of the al-Qaeda fighters were able to escape bad intel played a role but the lack of troops is what caused them to be able to escape
robokc1985 1 month ago
@robokc1985 The lack of intel was not because of the lack of ground troops.
Amadeus5150 1 month ago
@Amadeus5150 The best intel comes from the ground so yeah the lack of intel was from a lack of ground troops
robokc1985 1 month ago
@robokc1985 Sure, but the sort of Intel that was required to prevent Osama Bin Laden from escaping didn't require ground forces. He escaped because we thought the Pakistani's had their border guarded. Thats not the job of the ground forces to obtain said intel.
Amadeus5150 1 month ago
@Amadeus5150 uh actualy one of the main jobs of ground forces is to collect intel and if we had more ground forces in the area we would have had more intel on enemy movement.
robokc1985 1 month ago
@robokc1985 You didn't read what I said. I didn't say ground forces have no business collecting Intel, I said that specific type of intel was the responsibility of our various intelligence departments.
Though, you preface your argument with we should have had more forces stationed there, not more forces at the battle it self. Unless Im reading what you're saying wrong.
Amadeus5150 1 month ago
@Amadeus5150 well you didn’t read what i said because i did not say that. you said ground forces were not responsible for collecting that kind of Intel and that is exactly part of what their responsibility is and it was a lack of troops that was attributed to osama getting away along with many al qaeda leaders.
robokc1985 1 month ago
@robokc1985 Its not the responsibility of ground forces to obtain intel such as that. That's basic fucking intel that our various other intelligence eat for fucking breakfast. Putting ground forces there in the first place to obtain the intel would have compromised the operation.
Amadeus5150 1 month ago
@Amadeus5150 if you looked you would find information about it and the escape of Al qaeda forces from that battle was directly attributed to a lack of ground forces in the area The CIA has said this the pentagon has said this the general in charge of the operation has said this and he had requested more troops and was refused so im guessing your just hard headed and obviously you want to be right so bad even when your wrong it blinds you from seeing the truth
robokc1985 1 month ago
@robokc1985 You know I've never once said that the sole reason for his escape was the lack of intel, if I did then go find quote and I'll admit that was wrongt. I've read into it alot before, and I know about the various reasons why we didn't capture him. One of them being that CIA dude requesting more ground troops and pentagons refusal. I acknowledge that. But I was on the argument of the responsibility of ground troops to obtain that said intel, not Bin Laden.
Amadeus5150 1 month ago
@robokc1985 Liberal moral high ground? Do I have to spell it out? it implies the usage and manipulation of emotions to further your position of the debate. It's a common political tactic, the democrats use "poor people", and the republicans use the "troops".
Also, you use the experience argument, yet I can use it against you. What about the head of Mossad? He disagrees with you, and he has for more experience then you. I guess he's wrong.
.
Amadeus5150 1 month ago
@Amadeus5150 their is really nothing liberal about my high ground its the "liberal" part i protest
robokc1985 1 month ago
@robokc1985 And it's funny because down to the core of it, you haven't adressed the core of the argument, which was you don't know what Ron Pauls positions are beyond what you've seen on televison. I may be wrong, but Im willing to be money you haven't looked at hit voting record, or any of the candidates voting record.
Can you tell me which is the most conservative member of the candidates?
Hint hint look up Is john kerry a liberal and scroll down to the bottom of the list.
Amadeus5150 1 month ago
@Amadeus5150 im just going to skip to your conservative question well i would say that newt is the most conservative on what he has "done" but sanatorium is the most conservative on what he "believes" and i would vote for either of them gladly but their is no way in hell im going to be pro romney or ron paul bacuase of either what they say or do. if romney wins the nomination i will be taking a real hard look at wth has happened to my party and ron paul has no chance so no worries
robokc1985 1 month ago
@robokc1985 Why not answer all the questions? And please don't give the cop out "bcuz they r stupid lol".
If you had looked up Is john kerry a liberal on google, you would have found a study conducted that showed the most liberal and the most conservative members of the United States Congress. it gauges this by seeing how fiscally and socially conservative their voting record is. Guess who came at number 1?
Ron Paul.
And why would you vote for someone who voted for medicare part d?
Amadeus5150 1 month ago
Comment removed
robokc1985 1 month ago
And before anyone opens their mouth about NAFTA. NAFTA was the work of the Bush, Sr. administration and passed during the Clinton administration by the Republicans.
I have come to the conclusion that the Republican Party has become nothing more than a side show filled with a bunch of Carnival Barkers shouting out the same insults, character assasinations and entertaining comments for the sake of winning over the idiots that believe in them. These candidates are nothing more than cartoons.
IngloriusBastard11 1 month ago
@IngloriusBastard11 You talk about the republicans as if they are the only ones guilty of character assassination slimy politics. When you look at modern american politics from such a thin viewpoint you're only fueling partisan politicians to further the depression of american values which include life liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
Outsourcing isn't the causation of free-trade. Paul Krugman can educate you on this.
Amadeus5150 1 month ago
@IngloriusBastard11
And you defend Clinton by saying it was a republican bill, which is true, but Clinton as well as Al Gore and most of his staff supported it and support it to this day.
Amadeus5150 1 month ago
When are the American people going to realize that this has nothing to do with Republicans gaining control of the Government. This is all about how these people can gain control of the Office of the Presidency and milk the taxpayer for their own purposes, the security of their OWN families and friends, and create a networking organization for the future of their own children and grandchildren. It's nothing more than trying to gain as much power as possible for the sake of increasing their wealth
IngloriusBastard11 1 month ago
If these people believe in Capitalism why were so many jobs Outsourced during their reign of incompentency and stupidity? Why, under the Republicans, were so many good jobs eliminated? Why under the Republican administration were regulations that protected the American people eliminated? Why under the Republicans were companies allowed to pay lower taxes, export jobs and essentially toss the American workers under the bus? Why under the Republicans did we go into so much debt and chaos?
IngloriusBastard11 1 month ago
How in the hell does anyone allow a person like Gingwich to even contemplate running for office after what he did during his position as Speaker of the House. The hypocrisy was massive, the lies were abundant and the deception was rampant. How the hell does the American populace fall for this time, after time, after time.
These are the same types of people who put us into this mess because they had control of the Congress and the White House and broke the back of the Unions and middle class.
IngloriusBastard11 1 month ago
the difference between Russia and Iran is that Russia during the cold war lacked religion and wanted to live Iran which has a strong element of radical Islam that is in control wants to wipe Israel off the map and would use nuclear weapons in order to as they believe create the environment that is necessary for the 12th imam to come back and set the world as they see it right and destroy the infidels.
robokc1985 1 month ago
Comment removed
robokc1985 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@KingOCleveland Part 1 Well something Ron Pual supporters either dont know or have forgotten or just dont care about is that the very policies that Ron Paul is for are the same ones we had pre WWII and caused us not to act when hitler invaded country after country or when Japan invaded China. Its those policies that lead to 60 MILLION people world wide being killed and is why we now do something when a country begins to threatin our saftey
robokc1985 1 month ago
all of these guys are basicly the same. newt scares me with his "covert ops, we can kill iranian scientists destory their facilities, all of it deniable" talk. mitt is a corperate robot that only does the bidding of his massive super pac. obama doesnt know how to run the country. ron paul is the only choice. i'd love to stay in the middle east protecting our interests and defeating our enemies, but we just dont have the danm money anymore! its no longer financialy viable to occupy the midle east
KingOCleveland 1 month ago
why are thye always asking about mitt's record, giving him this much attention only helps his cause
KingOCleveland 1 month ago
Ron Paul is an okay candidate, but I am not fond of his weak Foreign Policies!
KnightxxArrow 1 month ago
OBAMA 2012
badazz1694 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the only speaker IN HISTORY to be fined 300,000.00 for ethics violations.....come on are you f***king kidding me....wake up America...if you don't just go back to sleep and when you wake up your childern will be jobless and homeless....VOTE RON PAUL 2012!!
gcatledge 1 month ago
Mitt Romney for president
Lovemasterflex100 1 month ago
man newt has to be one of the ugliest human beings i have seen in my life. way to ugly to be president. smh
mrsupercoolism 1 month ago
@mrsupercoolism: Just look at Newt. Is it me or would you trust Newt Gingrich to be alone with your little children? Just look at him if a picture of him were to pop up on the news tomorrow as the new Sandusky, would you be surprised? Newt just looks like a dirty old man to me.
hiiamrick 1 month ago 2
and if you are a Ron Paul supporter then you should’t be to concerned about morality because Ron Paul is just fine with Iran getting a nuclear weapon that would most likely be used on Israel or us and would kill millions of people so whatever.
robokc1985 1 month ago
@robokc1985 He's actually said and I quote "Im not fine with Iran getting nuclear weapons". However he has said he won't however commit an act of aggression against Iran, which is the accusation you should be attacking, not the figment of your imagination which is he doesn't care.
Amadeus5150 1 month ago
@Amadeus5150 Well if you lack the willingness to stop it then you obviously don’t care about it.
robokc1985 1 month ago
@robokc1985 So you admit you're political knowledge only exteneds from dinner table conversations. It's clear you have a lack of knowledge towards external affairs, 1. We have been for many years covertly hindering their performance. A Paul presidency wouldn't be able to halt CIA operations or any other covert operations. Two, the CIA's own documents have stated they won't be obtaining them for another 2 years. 3. Isreal intelligence have warn ed against an invasion of Iran.
Amadeus5150 1 month ago
@Amadeus5150 Excuse the typos.
Amadeus5150 1 month ago
@Amadeus5150 Uh WTH are you talking about crazy person 1. Its not covert if you know about it soooo apparently its not covert. 2. I know things from my OWN SERVICE IN The REGION that you obviously don’t know but some of it you can find in the wikileaked documents. 3. Israel has been asking for us to take a tougher stance on Iran. And who the hell is talking about invasion you don’t have to invade a country to stop them from getting nukes Gah Ron Paul supporters lack creative thought
robokc1985 1 month ago
@robokc1985 Im not a Ron Paul Supporter you partisan fuckass.
1. I form my opinion on foreign policy not on what some presidential candidate says, but on what released facts our intelligence agency's give the public. I haven't read the wikileaks document, nor do I really give a shit about them.
2. I don't see the relevance of your service in this discussion, inform me if it does.
3. Isreal implies for us to implement sanctions on them which we will.
Amadeus5150 1 month ago
@robokc1985 Im not a Ron Paul Supporter you partisan fuckass.
1. I form my opinion on foreign policy not on what some presidential candidate says, but on what released facts our intelligence agency's give the public. I haven't read the wikileaks document, nor do I really give a shit about them.
2. I don't see the relevance of your service in this discussion, inform me if it does.
3. Isreal implies for us to implement sanctions on them which we will.
Amadeus5150 1 month ago
@Amadeus5150 You call me partisan hmm Yeah i guess i am "partisan" which is because i actually believe in something and im not willing to compromise my beliefs so if you don’t like the partisan environment here is a suggestion you give up everything you believe and join us else wise quit bitching about it your part of it to dumb ass.
robokc1985 1 month ago
@robokc1985 I call you partisan because you are partisan, and thats all your intellect allows you to be, is a partisan tool for the republican party. You don't look a policy on the basis of whether or not it's beneficial to american people, but if it agrees with the party's basic outlook. You're the same as democrats and you don't even see it. You're always right and they're always wrong. That's how it always is.
Partisan doesn't mean compromising your core values, just letting you know.
Amadeus5150 1 month ago
@Amadeus5150 And now who is drawing conclusions tool for the republican party who says i agree 100% with the republicans or even 90% i agree with ron paul on almost as many things as i disagree with him on and really the democrats are alomst always wrong i really cant think of anything that demorcarts stand for that i like so yeah i vote republican
robokc1985 1 month ago
@robokc1985 Well I draw this conclusion because you just admitted to being partisan. I can quote you if you want.
Amadeus5150 1 month ago
@Amadeus5150 yeah im partisan i don’t compromise my beliefs i didn’t say i was a partisan republican im more of a libertarian but i don’t agree with how far they take it in many cases or the libertarian parties current pro choices stance
robokc1985 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@robokc1985 You said and I quote "really the democrats are alomst always wrong". What ever you call your self, a republican, conservative, libertarian, you're partisan alone from that statement.
Amadeus5150 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@robokc1985 Im not a Ron Paul Supporter you partisan fuckass.
1. I form my opinion on foreign policy not on what some presidential candidate says, but on what released facts our intelligence agency's give the public. I haven't read the wikileaks document, nor do I really give a shit about them.
2. I don't see the relevance of your service in this discussion, inform me if it does.
3. Isreal implies for us to implement sanctions on them which we will.
Amadeus5150 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@robokc1985 @robokc1985 Im not a Ron Paul Supporter you partisan fuckass.
1. I form my opinion on foreign policy not on what some presidential candidate says, but on what released facts our intelligence agency's give the public. I haven't read the wikileaks document, nor do I really give a shit about them.
2. I don't see the relevance of your service in this discussion, inform me if it does.
3. Isreal implies for us to implement sanctions on them which we will.
Amadeus5150 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@robokc1985 @robokc1985 Im not a Ron Paul Supporter you partisan fuckass.
1. I form my opinion on foreign policy not on what some presidential candidate says, but on what released facts our intelligence agency's give the public. I haven't read the wikileaks document, nor do I really give a shit about them.
2. I don't see the relevance of your service in this discussion, inform me if it does.
3. Isreal implies for us to implement sanctions on them which we will.
Amadeus5150 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@robokc1985 @robokc1985 Im not a Ron Paul Supporter you partisan fuckass.
1. I form my opinion on foreign policy not on what some presidential candidate says, but on what released facts our intelligence agency's give the public. I haven't read the wikileaks document, nor do I really give a shit about them.
2. I don't see the relevance of your service in this discussion, inform me if it does.
3. Isreal implies for us to implement sanctions on them which we will.
Amadeus5150 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@robokc1985 @robokc1985 Im not a Ron Paul Supporter you partisan fuckass.
1. I form my opinion on foreign policy not on what some presidential candidate says, but on what released facts our intelligence agency's give the public. I haven't read the wikileaks document, nor do I really give a shit about them.
2. I don't see the relevance of your service in this discussion, inform me if it does.
3. Isreal implies for us to implement sanctions on them which we will.
Amadeus5150 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@robokc1985 @robokc1985 Im not a Ron Paul Supporter you partisan fuckass.
1. I form my opinion on foreign policy not on what some presidential candidate says, but on what released facts our intelligence agency's give the public. I haven't read the wikileaks document, nor do I really give a shit about them.
2. I don't see the relevance of your service in this discussion, inform me if it does.
3. Isreal implies for us to implement sanctions on them which we will.
Amadeus5150 1 month ago
@robokc1985 its the ignorant statements like that that make it possible for blood sucking politicians to keep us at war and make millions from it. its our hoorible foreign policy that makes iran and the middle east and alot of the world hate us, and your solution is to contiue that policy? did you know that pakistan has nukes? they havnt used them. the soviets had 40,000, they didnt use them. we need to get out of the middle east ande mind our own danm buisness.
KingOCleveland 1 month ago
Comment removed
robokc1985 1 month ago
@KingOCleveland Yes i know pakistan has nukes and so does india pakistan got nukes in response to india having nukes and the war they had over a border dispute The difference being that Irans president believes that Isreal must be wiped off the map for the 12th imam to return and that america is the Great satan they believe that it is their sacret duty to kill infadels and guess who that is and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad the president of Iran has said he wants to wipe isreal off the map
robokc1985 1 month ago
Comment removed
robokc1985 1 month ago
Comment removed
robokc1985 1 month ago
Comment removed
robokc1985 1 month ago
Another quote from Andrew Jackson about enemies--
"You are a den of vipers and thieves. I intend to rout you out,
and by the grace of the Eternal God, will rout you out." Andrew Jackson quote on the central bank (earlier fed)
AB12AC321 1 month ago
RON PAUL 2012 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
TheLizardKing1967 1 month ago
newt-you flip flopping eugenic freak-go away
ekennye 1 month ago
@ekennye AMEN !!!! INFOWARS.COM
TheLizardKing1967 1 month ago
Ya, lets make cuts in America so we can spend it patching up Iran after we drop bombs destroying their roads, factories, homes, and hospitals.
22doodster87 1 month ago
Classy move to take shots at minorities on MLK day, as for giving jobs to children, theres a reason child labor is illegal.
SuperDrizzle7 1 month ago
Newt is part of the machine / status quo. Lying chickenhawk coward. Disgusting man.
bladeproject1 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"The system of government you fashioned, including the principles on which you based it, is increasingly obsolete, and hence increasingly, if inadvertently, oppressive and dangerous to our welfare. It must be radically changed and a new system of government invented---a democracy for the 21st century."
Newt Gingrich
Learningbyhearing 1 month ago
@Greensboro_NC
greensboronccom 1 month ago
Newt Gingrich is the only man smart enough to fix this mess!
bostinlagga1 1 month ago
@bostinlagga1 he wants kids to work as janitors, which is illegal. this is not china.
SuperDrizzle7 1 month ago
@bostinlagga1 Yeah, if you like the New World Order.
TheLizardKing1967 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
CLICK ON MY NAME - TEA PARTY VICTORY - TO SEE JUST HOW DANGEROUS RON PAUL'S INTERNATIONAL VIEWS CAN BE.
TeaPartyVictory 1 month ago
NEWT IS IN LOVE WITH ME.
MrSweetieBoi 1 month ago
RON PAUL 2012!!!!!!!!
TheEllampalli 1 month ago
@TheEllampalli He Cant Win Dont Jizz Yourself.
leonellus 1 month ago
@TheEllampalli Who?
Chareb94 1 month ago
economics newt is the 2nd best but he still does completely get rid of the federal reserve and any company with that kind of power will destroy our economy. also he is a chicken hawk lets face it he supports the wars and he hasn't gone, or how about him saying our founding fathers would have supported the drug war when George Washington grew ans smoke cannabis hemp on his farm. really hes hitting around .120 at this point and he doesn't even have family values he lefts his dying wife DICK!!!!!
chinchoweed 1 month ago
From 11 min. and on is spot on. Newt would cream Bummer in a debate. The media know that, that's why they are pushing Romney. He is weaker and that gives Bummer a better shot. With Newt as the nominee, The president doesn't have a chance.
Teapartyla 1 month ago
Mitt and Newt. Newt and Mitt. Hell, Newt Mitt Santorum Perry and Obama. There are differences between them all, but as a whole they all support the same thing. Now Ron Paul on the other hand, that's a disciplined man of integrity and intelligence. The rest of these tools are empty suits. Besides some being able to speak more eloquently than others, they're all the same. They are all the same, wake up!!!
asdf53888 1 month ago 2
"The duty of the President is to find a way to manage the federal government so that the primary pain is on changing the bureaucracy"
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Is that so?
asdf53888 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Oathbreaker (marital and constitutional).
Here's a good one I'd like to see the media jump on.. do a youtube search for
"Newt Gingrich - Let's allow terrorist attacks to happen"
So much for the oath of office.
Ron Paul is the only honest, non-oathbreaking candidate.
davekpghpa 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In the near future people won't be able to speak against the NWO. Do you guys realize on DEC 31 2011 the NDAA, National Defense Authorization Act was PASSED!! Do you guys realize if we do nothing just like DEC 31, SOPA stop online piracy act on JAN 24 2012 will PASS TOO!! If we don't do something now, do you have any idea what the near future will look like? We can either do something now or sit back and watch as WE ALL BECOME SLAVES!! Is this the CHANGE you people want? RON PAUL 2012!!!
L33thalLee 1 month ago
Neuwt will END this Omaba regime, finally brings back REALLY libral values to US the Constitution's PEOPLE!
VintageWhiteTerror 1 month ago
Why didn't he mention who he's worked with in the past? I hear echoes of "three purple hearts," haha
JamieDix2 1 month ago
I hear this man has said he's been there all along? Why didn't he do something? W.T.F? I checked in to be lied to again, I find it difficult to get out-n-about without a lie or two to get me back into the swing of things. If you know what I mean.
cArNeGiEization 1 month ago
this man is a straight shooter.
truthtify321 1 month ago
Newt 2012!!!
truthtify321 1 month ago
honestly the only person i noticed that is really for America and shows a lick of common sense is Dr. Ron Paul.... but that's my opinion..
themasondragon 1 month ago 2
serial hypocrisy..... The only real conservative is Dr. Ron Paul. The only choice for Liberty is Congressman Ron Paul! Wake up America! If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck guess what? its prob a fucking duck!
scheuer17 1 month ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
/watch?v=mCGdlWaN82M&feature=channel_video_title
JoeyCMarchio 1 month ago
Only Newt can take down Obama regime.
john2000young 1 month ago
Zachary, Never heard of him? Geesh, Hes been around probably longer than anyone on this panel... He Has Experience and he worked with Reagan.and was speaker of the house..Ob viously Zach doesnt know anything about politics or knows what he is talking about. One of those who goes to the polls with a blind fold on and points and marks his ballot...Get some education before you make a statement.
maymaytay1 1 month ago
@maymaytay1 You're obviously responding to the wrong person. karenpato1 is the one who is saying he's never heard of him. I obviously agree with you, Newt has been in Congress for 20 years.
ZacharyG89 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You may like my video about Newt's three marriages. Put
"watch?v=AQSsMRe6BJE" in the youtube search bar.
There are chickens in it. Everybody loves chickens!
It ends with a splash of Santorum!
SFHarry 1 month ago
Gringrich was a team with Bill Clinton, he can cut spending, low tax, employ jobs but Ron Paul can do a better job.
iChanging 1 month ago
Newt speaking truth against Romney. I respect Newt for saying what he said.
iChanging 1 month ago
hey newt, you are a sucker.
livingeasi 1 month ago
Why does Newt keep bringing up fuckin Reagen???....it's not like he fuckin knew him.....Newt's a 90's man, not 80's.....who the fuck ever heard of Gingrich in the 80's???
The only reason why people knew of him in the 90's is because he was always trying to bring down Clinton.....Reagen sucked, OK Newt !!!..He sold arms to Iran, he should have been hanged as a traitor!!!....He thinks because Reagen's been dead a few years and president over 20 years ago...that nobody remembers what an ass he was.
karenpato1 1 month ago
@karenpato1 Newt served in the House from 1979-1999. Reagan was President from 1981-1989. So yes, he did know him.
Also, Reagan inherited a recession and turned it around without blaming Carter, unlike how Obama is blaming Bush today. He also won 49 states in reelection in 1984 against Mondale. Reagan sucked? Really?
ZacharyG89 1 month ago
@ZacharyG89 ....bullshit, he didn't know Reagen......he's 90's ...not 80's...hello???
karenpato1 1 month ago
@karenpato1 You can't even spell "Reagan" properly. I rest my case.
ZacharyG89 1 month ago
@ZacharyG89 your reaching......how did Newt know Reagan?? Huh???.......Reagan was in the 1980's......not the 1990's .....everybody knows this!!!
karenpato1 1 month ago
@karenpato1 Did you not read the part where I said Newt served as a Representative through the 1980's?
ZacharyG89 1 month ago
@ZacharyG89 I never fuckin heard of him in the 80's.....ever......so, that's bullshit......he came out in 1995.
karenpato1 1 month ago