Please help to hold the big banks accountable by signing this petition to reinstate Glass Steagall. Go to Change dot org and search Reinstate Glass Steagall.
Glass steagall created monopolies. It was good that we repealed it. However, the bailouts during the financial crisis kept those monopolies from going out of business.
As usual, the free market tries to fix an issue, and the govt steps in and bails out corrupt corporations, perpetuating the fascist state we live in.
1-3 BOTH Democrats and Republicans are responsible for the mess that the USA finds itself in today !!!
The "Capitalistic" banking system of the USA died in 2008 with T.A.R.P.which both political parties and president George Bush sign onto.
T.A.R.P. "bailed out" the persons responsible for foolish casino-style investing (derivatives, "insurance" etc.) which failed (went broke) onto the backs of the taxpayer with the motto: "too big to fail".
2-3) In a true capitalistic system, nothing is "too big to fail"
What the USA has now is "Corporatist-Banking"
Corporatism = Fascism
"Free market Capitalism" was destroyed by:
1. The rise of the "Military-Industrial-CONGRESSIONAL-Complex"
2. America's presidents signing agreements regarding the WTO, NAFTA and other groups. That is; they signed un-ratified (by Congress) treaties which is contrary to the US Constitution. Congress did not protest (Was Congress "bought off" ?)
There would be no 'TARP' or corporate bailouts if 54 republicans had not voted 'yea' joining the 44 democrats [all but Hollings in SC] voting 'nay' on the GLB Bill written and sponsored by Republicans bribed and bought by $300 million in banking industry money from lobbyists.
To tell the truth I could not agree with you more If Clinton had actually cared about the American people he would not have signrd that bill. Democrats and Republicans are just two sides of the same coin in businesses pocket. I was just looking for a reason that the vote in the senate was split along party lines and Clintons still signed it going against his party.
@clublodi You must understand that when GS was repealed, the entire world was in the throes of a colossal bull market with (apparently) no end in sight. The wizards of Wall Street argued that if regulations could be tailored to allow more financial engineering they could virtually guarantee a perpetual bull market that would let every investor retire wealthy. Congress and the president, caught up in the spirit of the times, approved the repeal. It marked the top of the bull market.
Try to Cover up the fact the repeal was written by three republicans and voted on almost completely along party lines Republicans for and Democrat against. Also remember what was going on with Kenneth Star and the White water investigation at the time how do you think Clinton stayed in office after he was Impeached.
You appear to think it's OK for Clinton to have signed the repeal of Glass-Steagall because it helped him stay in office. If Bill Clinton had cared about anything other than himself, he would have resigned and allowed Al Gore to run as an incumbent.
It's important for Democratic voters to understand that the Democrats are as owned by corporate interests as are the Republicans. "US politics is nothing more than a TV reality show put on by Wall Street."
The GLB bill became a 'veto proof' majority in the final conference vote leaving Clinton unable to 'veto it' even if he wanted to. Whether he wanted to or not is not the question. The facts remain that 54 republicans voted 'yea' and 44 democrats [all but Hollings in SC] voted 'nay' on the GLB Bill written and sponsored by Republicans bribed and bought by $300 million in banking industry money from lobbyists.
@clublodi Fancy U advising Democrats. The Republicants don't like regulations, blame them for sending that Bill to Prez. Clinton. Also, ask them to stop trying to fight against Frank-Dodd.
Only the FDR Glass-Steagall principle will separate commercial from speculative banking, thus freeing the nation from obligations to Wall St. and the City of London, and re-establishing a credit system for rebuilding the nation.
H.R. 1489, Return to Prudent Banking Act of 2011, is before the House of Representatives, which aims to revive the separation between commercial banking and the securities business, in the manner provided in the Banking Act of 1933, the so called 'Glass-Steagall Act
Democrats were eager to pile on to this reversal of New Deal regulatory progressivism - fully 38 of 45 Senate Democrats voted for the repeal (which passed 90-8).
Glass-Stegall was revolked "in the Clinton years?"
What a GOP-hack. FACT: Glass-Stegall was revolked by the REPUBLICAN MAJORITY CONGRESS during the Clinton years. It passed because Phil Gramm wanted to give investment/insurance companies access to the capital in banks, and make Gramm and his GOP-Wall Street-CEOs richer. That is richer. More rich. Screw the middleclass and the homeowner, as long as Gramm and his Republican DEREGULATION criminals could suck the country dry.
medartist01: Glass Steagall wouldn't have been repealed without Clinton's strong support. He still won't admit that it was terrible policy.
I know it's hard for the politically naive to believe, but contempt for Bill Clinton and his administration isn't limited to Republicans. That sentiment is shared by ALL alert and thoroughly informed progressives. Scott Pearce speaks from this perspective.
Doesn't the president have the ultimate power to veto if he doesn't agree? Democrats and Republicans are in bed together. Think and stop acting like your rooting for a football team. How about being an American instead. If you take off you democrate/republican blinders you may be able to see the truth before its to late to save what is left of this country. Political parties are just a distraction to passify the masses into rooting for their team while being robbed by both!
Yes the president has the 'ultimate power' to veto a bill passed IF it's not passed with a 'veto proof' majority which the GLB Bill was in the final conference vote on the language of the bill..
Peter Schiff is an economic god compared to this jackass. Government intervention is what got us here in the first place. Remember this saying, "Regulations only harm the innocent."
I suppose you think that the FDA should do away with whatever regulations are remaining on our food industry, you moron. So, the salmonella in the peanuts that killed so many is OK for you, you quack? "Regulations ONLY harm the innocent?"
Are you that dense? You can't be THAT stupid. You must be a GOP businessman, who could care less about product safety or efficacy. Would you knowingly send products to consumers that could hurt/kill them.
Notice how the regualtions didn't stop those people from distributing those peanuts. Why make more regulations if they don't work. Why have any at all? How about we do away with the regulations and if a company poisons people with it's product we could do an investigation and bring them up on criminal charges of negligence or even charges of murder, or is that too much common sense for you?
@medartist01 You're an idiot if you think govt regulations are necessary or even effective. Let me ask you, would eat something that you knew would kill you? No, so why then would a company sell it? It's bad for business for a company to physically harm their customers. Grow a brain cell, will ya.
I got a quick question for ya, I'm trying to find a reason why Glass steagle was a bad idea, but it does seem to allow market manipulation and ponzie schemes to go amok. The only dirt i can find about this act is that regulators will always be corrupt and the rules had a price on the taxpayer (though minimal) Something seems wrong here.
@ExquisiteDoom Glass-Steagle isn't a bad idea. The problem is that it's a band-aid placed on a wound created by government regulation. The conflict of interest discussed in the video doesn't exist when:
@PissedFechtmeister Hello, don't know how old my original comment was. But i've got to say the glass-steagle is just a perfumed turd. Smells good, but it's absence would be better. Like you say, it would not be necessary without the consequence mitigation through public funds which is just breeding grounds for irresponsability and socio-economical destruction. I've learned much since my last comment :)
@ExquisiteDoom A) People are forced to be responsible for their own money (the FDIC relieves people of that responsibility by guaranteeing bank deposits)
B) Banks suffer the consequences of their mismanagement (banks are currently insulated from these consequences because the government will bail them out when they make bad decisions).
Both parties are to blame, because they are controlled by the corporations who benefit from these policies. The only difference is the Republican Party is open about its helping of corporate America while the Democratic Party has turned its back on unions and the working people.
".... while the Democratic Party has turned its back on unions and the working people...."
I'm curious, in what way do you feel this has occurred? I mean union dues go directly to democrat candidates. I never have ever heard a union member complain(out of the 10 that I know).
So in order to be reelected he hooked up with dirty friend from republican party name Dick Morris(political Advisor)who told him to move to the right (deregulation) which republican revolutionaries were supporting .
so he compromised to stay in power 2nd term and so u have all theese crises today
clinton compromised with the devil dick morris political advisor of the republican party. after a trashing mid term senate election under newt gengerich in order to be relected he was told to move to the right (deregulation) so he stole most of the policies and values of republican party so this law is one of them.
So Clinton comprimised his own values to get re-elected. Everyone is to blame except Clinton. Must be nice to live in a la la land. Dems are the "party" of the working class. They wanted afordable housing for all to boost their rep. When you force regulation to allow people to get mortage loans when by all rights they shouldn't, you will see a collapes like what we see now. Both parties are to blame.....the Dem's a little more though.
Clinton couldn't of 'been reelected' in 1999 because his 8 years were up. Clinton also couldn't veto the GLB Bill because it passed in the final 'conference vote' with a veto proof majority, but the initial vote on this republican authored and sponsored bill all bribed and bought by $300 million in banking industry money from lobbyists. with all 54 republicans voting 'yea' with 1 dem, Hollings [SC] voting for it, and all 44 Dems voting against it.
A democratic president has sex with a woman in the oval office and shoves a cigar in her vagina and it gets out(the news), THEN BOMBS PHARMECUTICAL FACTORY IN THE SUDAN. What? Are the republicans supposed to just say "nothing to see over here, move along"? Are you kidding me? If Clinton CARED about his country he wouldn't have put himself into that situation. Its liberals who covered for this POS while he gutted the country. You liberals are truly laughable. You are the enemy.
Wow, when did "liberals" become so almighty & powerful? Oh, and I guess bombing that pharmecutical company was far more devastating to you than the murder of 1 million Iraqis and displacement of another 4million. Spare us, loser.
You seem to very uneducated by your remarks. Liberal ideology is in control of pop culture. Movies, television, music. Its a fact. And I'd rather go to war because 3,000 americans were killed instead of a blowjob by an intern. Again you are the enemy.
It's called "Capitalism". Pop culture is whatever sell$ & whatever the people want. Bottom line is the almighty dollar - not your so-called "Liberal ideology". PS: Iraq didn't attack us.
I'm talking about the ideology fed to you through movies, television, music. These are liberal fronts. They broadcast "pop culture". Not sure why you brought capitalism into it. PS: There is no such country called "AlQaeda". It's called "The war on terror" not "the war on terror only if it is Afghanastan". And before you bring up Saddam, Saddam was tied to Ansar al-Islam, ALF, Hamas, KWP, MEK and the PLO via direct funding. Oh and don't forget Salman Pak.
lol well spoken southern irish and scottish worm lol he was social centre when came to office but lost the senate mid term election to new gengerich republican revolutionaries he needed to make comprose to stay in office for 2nd term so he contact and met in secret dick morris republican advisor who cautioned him to change course and follow and move towards the right in policy infact Clinton stole most of the ideas from republican and
Please help to hold the big banks accountable by signing this petition to reinstate Glass Steagall. Go to Change dot org and search Reinstate Glass Steagall.
LuthielV 4 months ago
Glass steagall created monopolies. It was good that we repealed it. However, the bailouts during the financial crisis kept those monopolies from going out of business.
As usual, the free market tries to fix an issue, and the govt steps in and bails out corrupt corporations, perpetuating the fascist state we live in.
JackofOneTrade567 4 months ago
1-3 BOTH Democrats and Republicans are responsible for the mess that the USA finds itself in today !!!
The "Capitalistic" banking system of the USA died in 2008 with T.A.R.P.which both political parties and president George Bush sign onto.
T.A.R.P. "bailed out" the persons responsible for foolish casino-style investing (derivatives, "insurance" etc.) which failed (went broke) onto the backs of the taxpayer with the motto: "too big to fail".
(cont..)
BoudiccaBlanc 7 months ago
2-3) In a true capitalistic system, nothing is "too big to fail"
What the USA has now is "Corporatist-Banking"
Corporatism = Fascism
"Free market Capitalism" was destroyed by:
1. The rise of the "Military-Industrial-CONGRESSIONAL-Complex"
2. America's presidents signing agreements regarding the WTO, NAFTA and other groups. That is; they signed un-ratified (by Congress) treaties which is contrary to the US Constitution. Congress did not protest (Was Congress "bought off" ?)
BoudiccaBlanc 7 months ago
3-3) With the repeal of Glass-Steagall...
The alternatives to Glass-Steagall (1933 - 1999) are:
1. The mess we have now; thanks to repealing Glass-Steagall.
2. Restore Glass-Steagall.
3. Restrict ownership of insured/guaranteed deposits to banks owned by the Federal Goverment
(as Russia does...actually there is not need for "deposit insurance")
....3a. Allowing some private lending/banking institutions to operate; but without guarantees (deposit -insurance) for depositors
BoudiccaBlanc 7 months ago
@BoudiccaBlanc
There would be no 'TARP' or corporate bailouts if 54 republicans had not voted 'yea' joining the 44 democrats [all but Hollings in SC] voting 'nay' on the GLB Bill written and sponsored by Republicans bribed and bought by $300 million in banking industry money from lobbyists.
Adnihilo 4 months ago
@Adnihilo I hear you! All of them should be arrested for Sedition!
BoudiccaBlanc 4 months ago
Comment removed
BoudiccaBlanc 7 months ago
To tell the truth I could not agree with you more If Clinton had actually cared about the American people he would not have signrd that bill. Democrats and Republicans are just two sides of the same coin in businesses pocket. I was just looking for a reason that the vote in the senate was split along party lines and Clintons still signed it going against his party.
clublodi 8 months ago
@clublodi You must understand that when GS was repealed, the entire world was in the throes of a colossal bull market with (apparently) no end in sight. The wizards of Wall Street argued that if regulations could be tailored to allow more financial engineering they could virtually guarantee a perpetual bull market that would let every investor retire wealthy. Congress and the president, caught up in the spirit of the times, approved the repeal. It marked the top of the bull market.
TYX91101 7 months ago
@clublodi
Clinton had to sign the GLB Bill passed because it was passed in the final conference vote with a veto proof majority
Adnihilo 4 months ago
Try to Cover up the fact the repeal was written by three republicans and voted on almost completely along party lines Republicans for and Democrat against. Also remember what was going on with Kenneth Star and the White water investigation at the time how do you think Clinton stayed in office after he was Impeached.
clublodi 8 months ago
You appear to think it's OK for Clinton to have signed the repeal of Glass-Steagall because it helped him stay in office. If Bill Clinton had cared about anything other than himself, he would have resigned and allowed Al Gore to run as an incumbent.
It's important for Democratic voters to understand that the Democrats are as owned by corporate interests as are the Republicans. "US politics is nothing more than a TV reality show put on by Wall Street."
Vote for ANY non-corporate party!
ScottPearceEsq 8 months ago
@ScottPearceEsq
The GLB bill became a 'veto proof' majority in the final conference vote leaving Clinton unable to 'veto it' even if he wanted to. Whether he wanted to or not is not the question. The facts remain that 54 republicans voted 'yea' and 44 democrats [all but Hollings in SC] voted 'nay' on the GLB Bill written and sponsored by Republicans bribed and bought by $300 million in banking industry money from lobbyists.
Adnihilo 4 months ago
@clublodi Fancy U advising Democrats. The Republicants don't like regulations, blame them for sending that Bill to Prez. Clinton. Also, ask them to stop trying to fight against Frank-Dodd.
Skilbeard 4 months ago
Only the FDR Glass-Steagall principle will separate commercial from speculative banking, thus freeing the nation from obligations to Wall St. and the City of London, and re-establishing a credit system for rebuilding the nation.
H.R. 1489, Return to Prudent Banking Act of 2011, is before the House of Representatives, which aims to revive the separation between commercial banking and the securities business, in the manner provided in the Banking Act of 1933, the so called 'Glass-Steagall Act
tepstolog 10 months ago
Thanks for this. unbiased educational videos are worth more to me than most of my textbooks. you have a fan at the university of central oklahoma
zx92027xz 1 year ago
Signed in 1933? After the damage was done? Typical D.C. smarts for you.
Then, repealed a 15 til midnight in 1999? Top of the market?
2008 - Congress votes to bail out the bankers against our wishes? Do what?
2010 - Republicans capture the vote and take back the house - mass amnesia?
I guess it's fitting that they have a seat at the table when the lights go out.
TYX91101 1 year ago
@TYX91101
Regarding the members of Congress.....
I recommend lamp posts & strong ropes
(same for the "Banksters")
BoudiccaBlanc 7 months ago
test
PissedFechtmeister 1 year ago
@PissedFechtmeister YT fucked up my last comments. I hate this new set-up.
PissedFechtmeister 1 year ago
Democrats were eager to pile on to this reversal of New Deal regulatory progressivism - fully 38 of 45 Senate Democrats voted for the repeal (which passed 90-8).
fufurios 2 years ago
Glass-Stegall was revolked "in the Clinton years?"
What a GOP-hack. FACT: Glass-Stegall was revolked by the REPUBLICAN MAJORITY CONGRESS during the Clinton years. It passed because Phil Gramm wanted to give investment/insurance companies access to the capital in banks, and make Gramm and his GOP-Wall Street-CEOs richer. That is richer. More rich. Screw the middleclass and the homeowner, as long as Gramm and his Republican DEREGULATION criminals could suck the country dry.
Thats a fact.
medartist01 3 years ago
medartist01: Glass Steagall wouldn't have been repealed without Clinton's strong support. He still won't admit that it was terrible policy.
I know it's hard for the politically naive to believe, but contempt for Bill Clinton and his administration isn't limited to Republicans. That sentiment is shared by ALL alert and thoroughly informed progressives. Scott Pearce speaks from this perspective.
justlifejustlove 2 years ago 2
Doesn't the president have the ultimate power to veto if he doesn't agree? Democrats and Republicans are in bed together. Think and stop acting like your rooting for a football team. How about being an American instead. If you take off you democrate/republican blinders you may be able to see the truth before its to late to save what is left of this country. Political parties are just a distraction to passify the masses into rooting for their team while being robbed by both!
chbs4122 2 years ago 7
@chbs4122
Yes the president has the 'ultimate power' to veto a bill passed IF it's not passed with a 'veto proof' majority which the GLB Bill was in the final conference vote on the language of the bill..
Adnihilo 4 months ago
like the GLB bill was passed with in a veto proof majority..
Adnihilo 4 months ago
Peter Schiff is an economic god compared to this jackass. Government intervention is what got us here in the first place. Remember this saying, "Regulations only harm the innocent."
sniper6081 3 years ago
What kind of drug are you on?
I suppose you think that the FDA should do away with whatever regulations are remaining on our food industry, you moron. So, the salmonella in the peanuts that killed so many is OK for you, you quack? "Regulations ONLY harm the innocent?"
Are you that dense? You can't be THAT stupid. You must be a GOP businessman, who could care less about product safety or efficacy. Would you knowingly send products to consumers that could hurt/kill them.
What a sicko.
medartist01 3 years ago 3
Wow, you're an asshole.
Notice how the regualtions didn't stop those people from distributing those peanuts. Why make more regulations if they don't work. Why have any at all? How about we do away with the regulations and if a company poisons people with it's product we could do an investigation and bring them up on criminal charges of negligence or even charges of murder, or is that too much common sense for you?
sniper6081 3 years ago
@medartist01 You're an idiot if you think govt regulations are necessary or even effective. Let me ask you, would eat something that you knew would kill you? No, so why then would a company sell it? It's bad for business for a company to physically harm their customers. Grow a brain cell, will ya.
JackofOneTrade567 4 months ago
I got a quick question for ya, I'm trying to find a reason why Glass steagle was a bad idea, but it does seem to allow market manipulation and ponzie schemes to go amok. The only dirt i can find about this act is that regulators will always be corrupt and the rules had a price on the taxpayer (though minimal) Something seems wrong here.
ExquisiteDoom 2 years ago
I'm sorry, but I don't respond to responses on comments I made almost half a year ago.
sniper6081 2 years ago
@ExquisiteDoom Glass-Steagle isn't a bad idea. The problem is that it's a band-aid placed on a wound created by government regulation. The conflict of interest discussed in the video doesn't exist when:
PissedFechtmeister 1 year ago
@PissedFechtmeister Hello, don't know how old my original comment was. But i've got to say the glass-steagle is just a perfumed turd. Smells good, but it's absence would be better. Like you say, it would not be necessary without the consequence mitigation through public funds which is just breeding grounds for irresponsability and socio-economical destruction. I've learned much since my last comment :)
ExquisiteDoom 1 year ago
@ExquisiteDoom A) People are forced to be responsible for their own money (the FDIC relieves people of that responsibility by guaranteeing bank deposits)
B) Banks suffer the consequences of their mismanagement (banks are currently insulated from these consequences because the government will bail them out when they make bad decisions).
PissedFechtmeister 1 year ago
@sniper6081
According to Ron Paul Peter Schiff is an economic 'god' but for everyone else he's just another failed investor.
Adnihilo 4 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You take the 'gal' out of 'steagall' and all you are left with is 'steal'
McCain/Palin '08
MidnightChimes 3 years ago
Clinton should have been impeached not for screwing Monica, but for screwing the American citizens.
gmfutube 3 years ago
Oh please, Republicans chose to waste America's time looking into Clinton's personal life instead of looking after America.
jrock714 3 years ago
I agree that Republicans wasted our time & money digging into Clinton's personal life.
I think he should have been impeached for NAFTA and other issues.
gmfutube 3 years ago 2
Excellent, so we BOTH agree The Republicans were failures.
jrock714 3 years ago
Failures? I think not. They have been very sucessful in their greed and rape of our constitution.
gmfutube 3 years ago
Are you saying that Democrats are not failures?
pharesc8019 3 years ago 2
Both parties are to blame, because they are controlled by the corporations who benefit from these policies. The only difference is the Republican Party is open about its helping of corporate America while the Democratic Party has turned its back on unions and the working people.
woawoa2008 3 years ago
".... while the Democratic Party has turned its back on unions and the working people...."
I'm curious, in what way do you feel this has occurred? I mean union dues go directly to democrat candidates. I never have ever heard a union member complain(out of the 10 that I know).
toddclemmer 3 years ago
ur so silly , like most innocent americans ,
u see Bill clinton has lost to newt gengerich the senate mid term polls if u remmeber vividly then he was loosing his chances of being re elected.
chetansingh2006 3 years ago
So in order to be reelected he hooked up with dirty friend from republican party name Dick Morris(political Advisor)who told him to move to the right (deregulation) which republican revolutionaries were supporting .
so he compromised to stay in power 2nd term and so u have all theese crises today
chetansingh2006 3 years ago
clinton compromised with the devil dick morris political advisor of the republican party. after a trashing mid term senate election under newt gengerich in order to be relected he was told to move to the right (deregulation) so he stole most of the policies and values of republican party so this law is one of them.
chetansingh2006 3 years ago
So Clinton comprimised his own values to get re-elected. Everyone is to blame except Clinton. Must be nice to live in a la la land. Dems are the "party" of the working class. They wanted afordable housing for all to boost their rep. When you force regulation to allow people to get mortage loans when by all rights they shouldn't, you will see a collapes like what we see now. Both parties are to blame.....the Dem's a little more though.
pharesc8019 3 years ago 3
@pharesc8019
Clinton couldn't of 'been reelected' in 1999 because his 8 years were up. Clinton also couldn't veto the GLB Bill because it passed in the final 'conference vote' with a veto proof majority, but the initial vote on this republican authored and sponsored bill all bribed and bought by $300 million in banking industry money from lobbyists. with all 54 republicans voting 'yea' with 1 dem, Hollings [SC] voting for it, and all 44 Dems voting against it.
Adnihilo 4 months ago
A democratic president has sex with a woman in the oval office and shoves a cigar in her vagina and it gets out(the news), THEN BOMBS PHARMECUTICAL FACTORY IN THE SUDAN. What? Are the republicans supposed to just say "nothing to see over here, move along"? Are you kidding me? If Clinton CARED about his country he wouldn't have put himself into that situation. Its liberals who covered for this POS while he gutted the country. You liberals are truly laughable. You are the enemy.
toddclemmer 3 years ago
Wow, when did "liberals" become so almighty & powerful? Oh, and I guess bombing that pharmecutical company was far more devastating to you than the murder of 1 million Iraqis and displacement of another 4million. Spare us, loser.
jrock714 3 years ago 2
You seem to very uneducated by your remarks. Liberal ideology is in control of pop culture. Movies, television, music. Its a fact. And I'd rather go to war because 3,000 americans were killed instead of a blowjob by an intern. Again you are the enemy.
toddclemmer 3 years ago
It's called "Capitalism". Pop culture is whatever sell$ & whatever the people want. Bottom line is the almighty dollar - not your so-called "Liberal ideology". PS: Iraq didn't attack us.
jrock714 3 years ago
I'm talking about the ideology fed to you through movies, television, music. These are liberal fronts. They broadcast "pop culture". Not sure why you brought capitalism into it. PS: There is no such country called "AlQaeda". It's called "The war on terror" not "the war on terror only if it is Afghanastan". And before you bring up Saddam, Saddam was tied to Ansar al-Islam, ALF, Hamas, KWP, MEK and the PLO via direct funding. Oh and don't forget Salman Pak.
toddclemmer 3 years ago
lol well spoken southern irish and scottish worm lol he was social centre when came to office but lost the senate mid term election to new gengerich republican revolutionaries he needed to make comprose to stay in office for 2nd term so he contact and met in secret dick morris republican advisor who cautioned him to change course and follow and move towards the right in policy infact Clinton stole most of the ideas from republican and
chetansingh2006 3 years ago
now you have the end result of that the credit crunch from sub prime mortgage crises all thanxs to a republican connection
chetansingh2006 3 years ago
The 2 biggestes causes were, and still are:
Greed & Stupidity
gmfutube 3 years ago