Comparing size, then yes, your brian can be more powerful then a computer, but with today's technology, unlikely.
Your eyes are useful but cameras today can see, record, zoom farther, etc. while all remaining in HD which is near the perfectness of reality.
Best graphics is not reality since graphics don't exist in reality, only in visuals from screens from technology. But of course reality is better looking, everyone knows that...
i am going to rob thousand of banks and will build a supercomputer which will have zeta-byte of ram and 4000000000000000000 million core i7 processor 800 billion graphic cards and obviously before this can boot up for the first time we will not be alive to see it. so if u want to help me to run this than give me all of your money and if possible rob as much banks as you can by the way i am planning to play god of war in it
Actually it's really cold, any room with a supercomputer like that has 24/7 cooling under the floor. It's pretty uncomfortable being in the same room, plus they are loud.... the video doesn't do it justice =)
We keep on bringing up crysis, because it is literally a supercomputer "killer"....what they are trying to say jokingly is that, dont boast you have a supercomputer UNLESS it can run crysis fluidly, as it is 1 of the most demanding applications there is to put on a modern day computer...i guess it has become a "computing benchmark" of sorts, lol, btw i think the game itself is good! but its all to do with taste i suppose :) my computers can't run it properly and i have "decent rigs"
Lol, already done that, and ""graphics booster"? wtf!! haven't heard that expression except for maybe some integrated chips on a laptop.....no, i mean i have a decent rig=3.8 gigahertz overclocked 780i sli with a 9800GX2 graphics card, i was referring to running crysis at 2560x1600, very high, AAx16!! AFx16, love to see "Ranger" try and handle that, lol...it might crash, but thanks anyway for the tips :)
I use Rivatuner myself, and my other rig has a stock GTX285 asus graphic card which is the worlds second most powerful single gpu out there but even that would struggle with crysis at anything above 1920x1200 resolution.....i dont know of anyone who has a 2560x1600 resolution monitor, lol
Lol, you might get away with it on 640x400 resolution, all settings on LOW, no AA, no AF, defrag the hard drive first, stop all non microsoft services, and lots of prayer!, lol..i tried crysis once for a joke on a 256 megabyte card which for most things is pretty good, but on those settings i averaged only about 4-9 frames per second!, it was a slideshow and not playable, Ranger might get 15 frames per second, lol
lol but im saving to buy a upgrade for my pc (more like a complete makenover :P) hehe im trying to save for 295 gtx in sli hehe then should it play just like any game =D im happy that i dont pay the electricity bill :P
wow! you get that GTX295 then you will indeed have the fastest most powerful graphics card combo out there...it says a lot when a 900 dollar upgrade system can out perform a 50 billion dollar supercomputer like Ranger
hehe but ill also need a new mobo cause mine doenst have sli lol and if im buying then ill buy also i7 and stuff like that, im gonna beat the ranger lol
Obviously you are joking, but anyone who actually cares, no it couldn't run crysis, lol, it's a completely different architecture. It doesn't have a "video card" even, everything is done over the network
LEt's see here. At the rate of technological process we should all have one of these at the size of the iPhone in exactly ten years, give or take a few months.
You are correct, Ranger was not the fastest supercomputer at the time. What was true is that Ranger was the fastest supercomputer dedicated to open academic research. That is not the case with Los Alamos.
This reminds me of when a simple calculator filled a room. Just think, we might one day each have smaller computer just like as powerfull as this one in our living room.
If you put only one monitor connected to all i think the monitor would explode and a black hole and the planet would be sucked in and everyone would die.
If you put only one monitor connected to all i think the monitor would explode and a black hole would form and the planet would be sucked in and everyone would die.
amd processors are slower than intel cpu's, BUT, they have lower latancys and use less power, on average.
what processer works best for you depends on your requirments, so amd may suck for you but it's just fine for me(although i would rather have a more powerful intel quad)
@Giratina386 Wat do u think apples supercomputer looks like where iPads iPhones come from
mquiroz90 4 days ago
"WHAAAAAAATTT??!!!"
randyck 2 months ago
Imagine all this, inside Apples newest product...
Giratina386 2 months ago
imagin playing battlefield 3 on this.
DarkZTerminal 4 months ago
And in 5 years it will be outdated.
jugarnaut40 4 months ago
wgats it used for lol
kapowinthfaceZING 6 months ago
Most powerful computer: YOUR BRAIN!
Most powerful camera: YOUR EYES!
Best graphics: REAL LIFE!
IlikeFoodnDrink 6 months ago
@IlikeFoodnDrink What you just said was beyond stupid.
Comparing size, then yes, your brian can be more powerful then a computer, but with today's technology, unlikely.
Your eyes are useful but cameras today can see, record, zoom farther, etc. while all remaining in HD which is near the perfectness of reality.
Best graphics is not reality since graphics don't exist in reality, only in visuals from screens from technology. But of course reality is better looking, everyone knows that...
soccerjonesy 5 months ago
hope it can run minesweeper
Brinkalator 8 months ago
what would happen if one overheated and exploded
whhhhhhhhhhhhhhhy15 9 months ago
but could it play shogun 2?
555skooterboy 9 months ago
but, can it handle, a... minecraft server!
salgalispretty 10 months ago
i am going to rob thousand of banks and will build a supercomputer which will have zeta-byte of ram and 4000000000000000000 million core i7 processor 800 billion graphic cards and obviously before this can boot up for the first time we will not be alive to see it. so if u want to help me to run this than give me all of your money and if possible rob as much banks as you can by the way i am planning to play god of war in it
kakamdas 1 year ago
@kakamdas your a dreamer
AlbertaCanada420 10 months ago
@kakamdas ahaha nice imagination but bad way of getting the money ahahaha
stephensoliven 8 months ago
But will it blend? That is the question
wemmetje1 1 year ago
homany ghz is this ? and how much ram ? lol
pedro702lv 1 year ago
not even water cooled
whyrate 1 year ago
almost that loud as my computer!!!
peace!!!
Jointazzz 1 year ago
If they can stop death then I would be interested in one of these.
TheVedicStudent 1 year ago
BUT HOW MANY USB PORTS DOES IT HAVE!!!
PhenomDesigns 1 year ago
The answer is 42.
nezpercenathan 1 year ago
worthless shit , i honestly don't see the point in this .. someone inlight me
INB4 "go watch the vid again dumbass"
combomaster99 1 year ago
@combomaster99 noob this aint newschoolers
PhenomDesigns 1 year ago
lol its built by sun microsystems, java and IBM roadrunner is faster
boldziga 1 year ago
the fastest computer is 69TLB/S (TALIBAN/SUCKERS)
piron416 1 year ago
cool
rjiang130598 1 year ago
There are thousands PS3 all over the world connected as the world's most powerful computer network. Blows Ranger out of the water.
Entropy56 2 years ago
Like to see you do any real time stuff with that network.
NPSF3000 2 years ago
pretty sure theres more computers connected together then ps3 =)
boen747 2 years ago
Those are pro "1337" hacker's.
Joe11Blue 2 years ago
Think of what would happen if a pro 1337 hacker got in control of that! =o
xXxDragunov14xXx 2 years ago
my comp almost crashed just watching this :D
hahahohohi9845 2 years ago 23
i bet its really hot in that room!
IamXeden 2 years ago 2
Actually it's really cold, any room with a supercomputer like that has 24/7 cooling under the floor. It's pretty uncomfortable being in the same room, plus they are loud.... the video doesn't do it justice =)
SkoobaTim 2 years ago
How much does one of those cost?
2 billion dollars?
Better start gettin' referrals. lol
I'll just wait 5 years, by then a Blackberry sized computer ought to run Crysis without...
Who am I kidding. NASA only did for fourteen minutes! Or mabye that was some other game.
NajaArboque 2 years ago
shut up with that crysis shit, stupid game...
afrojavix 3 years ago
We keep on bringing up crysis, because it is literally a supercomputer "killer"....what they are trying to say jokingly is that, dont boast you have a supercomputer UNLESS it can run crysis fluidly, as it is 1 of the most demanding applications there is to put on a modern day computer...i guess it has become a "computing benchmark" of sorts, lol, btw i think the game itself is good! but its all to do with taste i suppose :) my computers can't run it properly and i have "decent rigs"
greekgod41 2 years ago
hi, i may have some tips to let it run better
you can: lower the resolution and the AA
and you maybe can set the robust graphics booster to turbo it worked for me =D
uut0 2 years ago
Lol, already done that, and ""graphics booster"? wtf!! haven't heard that expression except for maybe some integrated chips on a laptop.....no, i mean i have a decent rig=3.8 gigahertz overclocked 780i sli with a 9800GX2 graphics card, i was referring to running crysis at 2560x1600, very high, AAx16!! AFx16, love to see "Ranger" try and handle that, lol...it might crash, but thanks anyway for the tips :)
greekgod41 2 years ago
graphics booster is a thing that overclocks your grahpics cards it was on the bios at my pc
p.s. i even cant run any game at 2560x1600 cause thats bigger then my screen :P lol
np
uut0 2 years ago
I use Rivatuner myself, and my other rig has a stock GTX285 asus graphic card which is the worlds second most powerful single gpu out there but even that would struggle with crysis at anything above 1920x1200 resolution.....i dont know of anyone who has a 2560x1600 resolution monitor, lol
greekgod41 2 years ago
omg u have some very good cards, i ve the 8600 GT lol i dont even think about running that game :P it wont start lol
uut0 2 years ago
Lol, you might get away with it on 640x400 resolution, all settings on LOW, no AA, no AF, defrag the hard drive first, stop all non microsoft services, and lots of prayer!, lol..i tried crysis once for a joke on a 256 megabyte card which for most things is pretty good, but on those settings i averaged only about 4-9 frames per second!, it was a slideshow and not playable, Ranger might get 15 frames per second, lol
greekgod41 2 years ago
lol but im saving to buy a upgrade for my pc (more like a complete makenover :P) hehe im trying to save for 295 gtx in sli hehe then should it play just like any game =D im happy that i dont pay the electricity bill :P
uut0 2 years ago
wow! you get that GTX295 then you will indeed have the fastest most powerful graphics card combo out there...it says a lot when a 900 dollar upgrade system can out perform a 50 billion dollar supercomputer like Ranger
greekgod41 2 years ago
hehe but ill also need a new mobo cause mine doenst have sli lol and if im buying then ill buy also i7 and stuff like that, im gonna beat the ranger lol
uut0 2 years ago
Can it run crysis with a decent framerate?
greekgod41 3 years ago 2
if it cant id lmao
GTGinadll 3 years ago
Lol
femnazihater 3 years ago
Obviously you are joking, but anyone who actually cares, no it couldn't run crysis, lol, it's a completely different architecture. It doesn't have a "video card" even, everything is done over the network
SkoobaTim 2 years ago
LEt's see here. At the rate of technological process we should all have one of these at the size of the iPhone in exactly ten years, give or take a few months.
deathjester2142 3 years ago
He claims this is the faster super computer, "Popular Mechanics" says the Roadrunner built for Los Alamos National Labs is who's lying??
lookn4thepowpow 3 years ago
I am certain Los Alamos has it beat.
SpeedingStudent 2 years ago
Yeah, Los Alamos is over petaflop
triniclemist90 2 years ago
Thank you.
SpeedingStudent 2 years ago
wut does a petaflop mean?
uut0 2 years ago
1000 trillion......thats fast!
greekgod41 2 years ago
@lookn4thepowpow
You are correct, Ranger was not the fastest supercomputer at the time. What was true is that Ranger was the fastest supercomputer dedicated to open academic research. That is not the case with Los Alamos.
Go back to the video. It's there.
Brad4TACC 1 year ago
This reminds me of when a simple calculator filled a room. Just think, we might one day each have smaller computer just like as powerfull as this one in our living room.
sin1st3rkilla 3 years ago
imagine a 9800 graphics card in each one of those crysis would be a tiny bug to run.
WeKnowWhatsFunnyFilm 3 years ago 14
think of all the monitors... lets say... 2*amount of computers*
holy shit...
matthew102000 3 years ago
If you put only one monitor connected to all i think the monitor would explode and a black hole and the planet would be sucked in and everyone would die.
WeKnowWhatsFunnyFilm 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you put only one monitor connected to all i think the monitor would explode and a black hole would form and the planet would be sucked in and everyone would die.
WeKnowWhatsFunnyFilm 3 years ago
a supercomputer..... and no Crisis???!
cameeuu 3 years ago
AMD Opterons scale much better than Intel Xeons, hence why most super computers use AMD.
lollipop2kewl 3 years ago
and I am running a core 2 duo E6750 at 4.2ghz on water, your point?
AMD does suck now, I used to be an AMD fan back in the Barton core days, but they suck now.
futureunknown 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
bullcrap.. AMD sucks
futureunknown 3 years ago
hey amd dont suck intel may be ahead but that wasnt always but im running 6000 x2 @3ghz and dont ever say that again!!!
noobtrap3000 3 years ago
DUDE AMD SUCKS. If it overheats (your fan dies) IT WILL OVERHEAT TO OVER 600 DEGREES FARENHEIT!!!
Intels just shutdown NOT MELT THE ENTIRE COMPUTER
Dadrewster569569 3 years ago
erm that was the amd athlon without the heatsink they reach about 100 degrees the opteron without a fan
noobtrap3000 3 years ago
u mean like 200 degrees celcius
Dadrewster569569 3 years ago
amd processors are slower than intel cpu's, BUT, they have lower latancys and use less power, on average.
what processer works best for you depends on your requirments, so amd may suck for you but it's just fine for me(although i would rather have a more powerful intel quad)
amaster6900 3 years ago
Is it that the one near Wacko?
Wizard4592 3 years ago
not just the most powerful supercomputer also most loudest lol
NoxeN2008 3 years ago
Cool!!
fishfrompluto 3 years ago
Seeing the lonestars were cool. Cant wait for TACC to hold another open house ...
<3, another UT-Austin techno geek
nsilkey 3 years ago