Noam Chomsky & Kathleen Cleaver on Fred Hampton, Black Panther Party (5/7) (1997)

[slckr80s]

Noam is pissed off that Kathleen Cleaver said she steals his books.

[slckr80s]

Noam just wants to get this shit over and done with.

[sullenboy1o3o]

This isnt a talk about race and gender, its just a bunch of questions.

[RapedByRepublicans]

He invoked joe mengle (sp) who was a nazi, yes, but he was talking about within the context of his experiments, which he pts out have also gone on here (tuskeegee syphyllis ex et al), womens rights were shit in 1957, at least in the us, and the panthers aren't racist, u made a good point on that one. "As racist as they are perceived to be" which was a main aim (discreditidation) of the subject they were just talking about, cointelpro

[sovern009]

This is the gettist Ive ever seen Noam

[dfarmbrough]

What is the most fascinating aspect of this video' for me is that the Black Panther Party would employ a caucasian. Perhaps they are not so racist as they are often perceived to be. Another interesting thing is Noam Chomsky, who starts by saying he wants to de-personalise questions, then goes on to talk about himself! He talks a lot of tripe - "Go back forty years and elementary things like ordinary respect for women's rights didn't exist ". And invoking the Nazis doesnt further his arguments.

[LothairApoclyane]

@dfarmbrough Perhaps the most fascinating aspect of your comment is that none of your points make sense.

[dfarmbrough]

@LothairApoclyane Why would it be fascinating to find a YouTube comment that didn't make sense? There are hundreds of thousands of those. I think what I said made perfect sense, if you didn't agree with any of it you're welcome to challenge any one point and I will argue it through with you. I am always willing to see the other side and won't ever resort to abuse.