Is this supposed to be a "cheap way" of measuring a bullet's speed? If you didn't have this expensive camera, how would you know if the second wheel didnt turn 10 times before having the *observable* angular displacement? Then again, you could change the speed, do it again and compare the two displacements to find out....duuhhh. But then, you wouldnt need the camera^^
@LordAsrielAuB actually it does not need high speed camera because the discs need not rotate fast. we just need markings indicating the angles. It works like this:
1. align the 2 discs such that they start at the same marking
2. confirm that they rotate at same speed by any DC. 1/500s exposure is good enough
3. since they rotate at same speed and start at same marking, there is no complications on how many revolutions the 2nd disc turned before
Are you sure 100% that the bullet did not change its direction at the first penetration?!! Since the first disk is rotating, At the first bullet penetration the first disk will change the bullet direction. Thus, you may have some difference in the distance more than 1.5 meters.
Much simpler to shoot the bullet into a block of wood suspended on a string and measure the angular displacement, but you can't justify the expense of a high speed camera system in your grant proposal
@ArtStone Not quite, that's assuming a perfect transfer of momentum... The high speed camera isn't the main measuring device either, it's just there so people can see the bullet. Knowing the distance between the two discs and knowing the angular velocity of said discs we can work out the speed.
@gettavid Not quite 200 years ago, but in the 1840's a scientist named Fizeau measured the speed of light by passing it through a rotating disk. The disk had teeth on it, like a gear, and light passed through one gap out to a reflector and returned through the next gap on the disk. By fine tuning the speed of the disk until he could see the returning beam, he got the first experimental value for the speed of light!
"IF YOU ONLY KNEW THE MAGNIFICENCE OF THE THREE, THE SIX AND THE NINE... THEN YOU WOULD HAVE A KEY TO THE UNIVERSE."
-NIKOLA TESLA
(AFTER CAUSING 1899 CAPE YAKATAGA AND YAKUTAY BAY EARTHQUAKES FROM COLORADO SPRINGS)
111 YEAR OLD RIDDLE SOLVED BITCHES. THAT IS WHY YOU CAN'T DATE THAT QUOTE. THAT IS WHY HE ELUDES RECOGNITION. THAT IS THE SIMPLE TRUTH THEY DILUTE WITH CONSPIRACY.
ok.. when they fire the bullet, and the two discs are turning at a very high RPM(Rounds Per Minute), the bullet goes through the first disc at a point. but by the time it reaches the second disc, the second disc has turned a bit, so the bullet hits it at a different point, so you can see the difference in the two points and tell the exact speed.
ok, but what if the first spinning disc knocks the bullet a fraction sideways, it wont be totally acurate will it, or would that not even make a difference because of the speed of the bullet?
yes. in the sense that this is a REALLY slowed down footage, so in reality, the bullet will be soooo fast, which is made of solid metal, hence having extremely high momentum when compared to the card/paper type material.
and also, the length of the bullet is very short, as its a small caliber bullet, and so there is not going to be almost any direction change either.
Is this supposed to be a "cheap way" of measuring a bullet's speed? If you didn't have this expensive camera, how would you know if the second wheel didnt turn 10 times before having the *observable* angular displacement? Then again, you could change the speed, do it again and compare the two displacements to find out....duuhhh. But then, you wouldnt need the camera^^
Oh, and btw, nice gun? ^^
LordAsrielAuB 6 months ago
@LordAsrielAuB actually it does not need high speed camera because the discs need not rotate fast. we just need markings indicating the angles. It works like this:
1. align the 2 discs such that they start at the same marking
2. confirm that they rotate at same speed by any DC. 1/500s exposure is good enough
3. since they rotate at same speed and start at same marking, there is no complications on how many revolutions the 2nd disc turned before
AuKNiFe 6 months ago
Sometimes I just want to fucking SLAP my dick as hard as possible on my desk!
RababaInc 7 months ago 16
@RababaInc da fuck?
calebp9503 1 month ago
change direction? i'm sure they're not shooting at concrete, its MIT, i think they know what they're doing.
AZIlluminati08 9 months ago
Are you sure 100% that the bullet did not change its direction at the first penetration?!! Since the first disk is rotating, At the first bullet penetration the first disk will change the bullet direction. Thus, you may have some difference in the distance more than 1.5 meters.
TheBlackSky000 9 months ago
Where's the bullet?
HoneycombAgent 1 year ago
Much simpler to shoot the bullet into a block of wood suspended on a string and measure the angular displacement, but you can't justify the expense of a high speed camera system in your grant proposal
ArtStone 1 year ago
@ArtStone Not quite, that's assuming a perfect transfer of momentum... The high speed camera isn't the main measuring device either, it's just there so people can see the bullet. Knowing the distance between the two discs and knowing the angular velocity of said discs we can work out the speed.
s651098 1 year ago 4
@gettavid You could just solve Maxwell's equations and get the exact value. No need for experiments.
unchained1978 1 year ago
thats clever!
LLit11 1 year ago
Very cool video. Interesting way to determine bullet velocity.
taofledermaus 1 year ago
everytime the bullet penetrates a disk, it slows down, but its a minute change in speed.
humanidt 1 year ago
@gettavid Not quite 200 years ago, but in the 1840's a scientist named Fizeau measured the speed of light by passing it through a rotating disk. The disk had teeth on it, like a gear, and light passed through one gap out to a reflector and returned through the next gap on the disk. By fine tuning the speed of the disk until he could see the returning beam, he got the first experimental value for the speed of light!
looksintolasers 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@looksintolasers TESLA MADE EARTHQUAKES IN 1899.
SEPTEMBER 3, 1899
SEPTEMBER 6, 1899
SEPTEMBER 9, 1899
"IF YOU ONLY KNEW THE MAGNIFICENCE OF THE THREE, THE SIX AND THE NINE... THEN YOU WOULD HAVE A KEY TO THE UNIVERSE."
-NIKOLA TESLA
(AFTER CAUSING 1899 CAPE YAKATAGA AND YAKUTAY BAY EARTHQUAKES FROM COLORADO SPRINGS)
111 YEAR OLD RIDDLE SOLVED BITCHES. THAT IS WHY YOU CAN'T DATE THAT QUOTE. THAT IS WHY HE ELUDES RECOGNITION. THAT IS THE SIMPLE TRUTH THEY DILUTE WITH CONSPIRACY.
-CMS
insightllc 1 year ago
Interesting experiment!!
nickharvey7 2 years ago
only problem, hiting the disks decelerate the bullet
atomic1234567890 2 years ago
I would think it would be a tiny amount.
In any case, that amount could be predicted and accounted for.... right?
JuryDutySummons 2 years ago
Yes it can.
chaz706 2 years ago
@JuryDutySummons true that decelerate but also true that a thin piece of paper is almost inefective against a lead ball
atomic1234567890 1 year ago
That's kind of my point. 3 months ago you were saying that the test has a problem because the disks decelerate the bullet.
JuryDutySummons 1 year ago
The average speed of a bullet is half the muzzle velocity...
KileSimons 2 years ago
d=distance of discs
w= angle between shotholes.
omega=angular speed of rotating disks
speed v=omega*d/w.
the smaller the angle the higher the resulting speed.
zdrastvutye 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
dis anyone now what ass smell like
abel90221 2 years ago
Does anyone knows what software can be used to add rectangles and text to videos (like in this clip) ?
jorgearroyop 2 years ago
.50 BMG
647 gr (41.9 g) Speer 3,044 ft/s (928 m/s) 13,144 ft·lbf (17,821 J)
655 gr (42.4 g) ADI 3,029 ft/s (923 m/s) 13,350 ft·lbf (18,100 J)
700 gr (45 g) Barnes 2,978 ft/s (908 m/s) 13,971 ft·lbf (18,942 J)
750 gr (49 g) Lapua 2,618 ft/s (798 m/s) 11,419 ft·lbf (15,482 J)
800 gr (52 g) Barnes 2,895 ft/s (882 m/s) 14,895 ft·lbf (20,195 J)
muchadoaboutnothingg 2 years ago
Somebody might be able to tell me... What is the estimated average speed of a flying bullet?
PressStudio 3 years ago
oh no it explained it in the description!!! sorry!
theodorbrinch 3 years ago
This is soooooo totally awesome method to find the speed of something really fast!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
its totally mechanical so the result will be sooo tatally incredibly accurate!!!
pashaahsj 3 years ago
i don't get it! can you explain it to me?
theodorbrinch 3 years ago
ok.. when they fire the bullet, and the two discs are turning at a very high RPM(Rounds Per Minute), the bullet goes through the first disc at a point. but by the time it reaches the second disc, the second disc has turned a bit, so the bullet hits it at a different point, so you can see the difference in the two points and tell the exact speed.
Pasha
pashaahsj 3 years ago
ok, but what if the first spinning disc knocks the bullet a fraction sideways, it wont be totally acurate will it, or would that not even make a difference because of the speed of the bullet?
theodorbrinch 3 years ago
yes. in the sense that this is a REALLY slowed down footage, so in reality, the bullet will be soooo fast, which is made of solid metal, hence having extremely high momentum when compared to the card/paper type material.
and also, the length of the bullet is very short, as its a small caliber bullet, and so there is not going to be almost any direction change either.
pasha.
pashaahsj 3 years ago
um... i have a physics exam coming up pretty soon, i wonder if maybe you could help me out abit!!!
theodorbrinch 3 years ago
SURE!!! of course.. i can...
I have an awesomely good physics teacher in college and i understand all stuff very well.
:)
tke. cre.
Pasha.
pashaahsj 3 years ago