@pocketsearch Yeah it's pretty terrible. He grips the racquet so high, almost like he's playing with a ping pong paddle, and then he just jolts it in with some topspin
whenn in slow motion at the very end it looks out x it mite just b the bounce of it that confuses me he is still relly good player tho no doubt bo0ut it x
holy shit, i can't even imagine in my head an absolute roddickulous shot like this...thus, i am unable to believe what i just saw and will pretend it never existed.
how did andy roddick get to that point after troicki did the forehand volley into the other side of court den andy roddick got it and get another brilliant backhand volley sliced perfect and andy still went for it and angled it so perfect ............... amazing shot absolutely immaculate and perfect brilliant shot by a brilliant player a 1 in a life time shot by andy roddick i canot believe it is so amazing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:D:D:D:D:):):):)(L)(L)(L)
That was a really good point by Roddick. and yes you are right. roddick's game is not very pretty to look at. His groundstrokes and movement are not natural ... or fluid like federer's.
Andy is known for his strong psychological character . But also fastest serve world record ridiculous shots and much endurance during long matches i guess he the only one who can somehow match Federer
every one gets pawned by fed almost allways just that roddick has much more endurance than other players and against fed it can be useful .. remember the match against Isner ? . at us open .. other player couldn't even get to the fifth set with him ..
yeah but roddick lost to isner right? i mean, i agree with you that he has endurance but his mental game sucks and he's giving away some crucial points(remember the set point he lost at wimbledon with federer? that silly volley...)
thats got nothing to do with his mental game, at 27 its no longer as big a problem as it used to be, at wimbledon he though fed's shot was gonna go out at the last moment he decided to volley it, and he caught the ball late, end of story
I love how arguments break out over a tennis clip, some one should design a website where everyone can just trash talk each other so they'll stop doing it on youtube
I know, seriously. Lol its just so funny how certain people live to comment against others. We honestly don't need nor want a long conversation about luck, everyone has their opinion of it, or racism (on a lot of videos, not this one, but a lot of other ones)
cashyr shut the hell up, Tennis shots like that are not like a lottery. That was pure skill, so take your elementary mathematics + simple english and shove it up your egotistical brain.
Actually, I thought Federer was i top form during the wimby final. He played such a long match and had under 40 unforced errors, 50 aces, over 100 winners! His fastst serve was 135 mph! And his first serve % was around 62. Yeah, I think that's Federer at his best, or almost best. Did I mention he only had 4 unforced errors?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
good video! but i have to say it is appropriate to say luck is involved for this particular point. the probability of Roddick getting the shot at such an angle is very low. Just think if he were to repeat this 1000 times, how many of those will actually be like the shot now? very low. so yes, luck is involved, but of course so is his skills
lol, dude i think we all realized it was a pretty unlikely shot.. there are just so many ppl like u who try to sound so clever, e.g look a bit below on comments, gueorguijoukov is trying to be a smartass.
totally agree with magnetic. Do you think that skills of a pro is based on luck? That is clearly a though of an amateur who doesn't know the reach of this sport..
So when a ball hits the top of the net and falls to the other side of the court and you win the point at 7-8 tie break 3 set u dont think you were goddamn lucky?
It's fine to claim, but can you demonstrate us something lik, how everything is probabilities and skills?
And, although examples are nice, they don't justify your statement in anyway. Tell me how skills are relevant to our state and how probabilities are related to what happens.
Because you point out stupidity without showing any signs of intelligence. Saying luck is real is as dumb as saying it's not. Same thing goes for atheism and religion.
You should first try to get an accurate definition of luck.
But answer me, is your name, your job or your reputation makes a flase statement true because YOU said it? No. A stays A no matter who speak. And what if millions says A, will it make it be Z? No. State remains unchanged. Then, numbers behidn an idea doesn't make it better.
So, does a dictionary have to be consider as right because everyone consider it so? No.
Then, make up a description of luck and enlight us of your wisdom.
Because if you say what you said, you believe to be inevitably right, because the opposite would imply you are stupid beyond measures .
As you present others as being stupid, I also doubt you are qualifying yourself of dumb since you willingly separated two opposites answers and granted supidity to the opposite camp.
But, tell me how it is stupid beyond measures? Because it's not your answer or is there an other reason?
Every shot in tennis is luck to some degree. You can have an easy forehand and miss it, it's just that you probably won't. For someone like Federer, it's more like a .7% chance he'd miss an easy forehand. Being better decreases the chance you're going to miss, but it doesn't guarantee anything. The fact that Roddick pulled this off shows that he does indeed have quite a bit of skill. That being said, luck could have played its part in this shot.
You can't call that kind of a shot luck. The only LUCKY shots in tennis are when the ball hits the pole and goes in or clips the top of the net and rolls over or when your ball hits the line and gives your opponent a terrible bounce. Those are luck. But when nothing of those things are in fact and it is just you, the racket, and the ball, how is that luck?
Troicki and serbian people dislikes
dode1807 1 day ago
AWWWW RODDICKULOUS!
AkMachx 2 weeks ago
19 people dont know what tennis is!
JanoSBeaTz 4 months ago
ANDREW STEPHEN RODDICK GONE MAD!
Timothy9BALA 5 months ago
What did I even just see...?
maddash24seven 5 months ago
lololol at the end....love-15
awateilrahc 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
lololol at the very end...love-15
awateilrahc 5 months ago
lololol at the very end...love-15
awateilrahc 5 months ago
Excellent
nyasha0000 6 months ago
at 0:43 it looks like its out doesn't it? but the next shot its not
sumthin333 6 months ago
@LGHHJHH yeah, you suck moree gaybob
BigChud08 6 months ago
Stiffler
unbamyotrobam 7 months ago
@mrtennis
No not really -.-
0210mick 7 months ago
He got that move from Federer cause he's always the one getting passed at net.
MrTennisMenace 7 months ago
stiffler won
elilable 8 months ago 2
robbie koenig is the best commentator, maybe he's got a bit of arab in him.
frilloz4 8 months ago 4
dont you think roddick looks like richardson from the LA Kings hockey team
hockeybijuus 8 months ago
19 ppl are jealous of rodDICK!!!
rohith954 8 months ago 5
"Something clever about the amount of people who disliked so I can get a thumbs up"
Drewalloveryou1 9 months ago
@Drewalloveryou1 hahahahahha nice try.....
lurevu 9 months ago
actuall its gud i like to see u doin sumthin like dat i bet u cant even hit a tennis all
puddz100 10 months ago
why are both the top rated comments the same..
MrFunnyWabbit 10 months ago 11
lol wat a physco...
MadAssFcker 11 months ago
ridickurous!!!!
abcjc1 11 months ago
Viktor just walks away and laughs thinking..."what just happened"
Zailis 11 months ago
19 people could't make that roddikolos shot
joemdude 1 year ago 3
woow 666 likes
victor12mcr 1 year ago
ohhhh emmmm geeeee!!!! fav tennis player everrrrr
ilovevolleyball2010 1 year ago
BORING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
MrRahulSaxena25 1 year ago
The other guy has a very ugly forehand I must say : - /
pocketsearch 1 year ago
@pocketsearch Roddick's is uglier to be honest. It's almost like he's cramping
DestroyerAlexandros 1 year ago
@DestroyerAlexandros But, Roddicks' backhand is by far the worst on the tour.
pocketsearch 1 year ago
@pocketsearch Yeah it's pretty terrible. He grips the racquet so high, almost like he's playing with a ping pong paddle, and then he just jolts it in with some topspin
DestroyerAlexandros 1 year ago
@pocketsearch it's very bad but probably not the worst on the entire tour, and certainly not by far. There are like 2000 players on the tour
bananatree1234567 1 year ago
@bananatree1234567 Deffos, but it is something he could work on.
pocketsearch 1 year ago
haha at the end "luv - 15" hahaha
JinNOSify 1 year ago
@JinNOSify lol all that for nothing...
hattrickster33 1 year ago
Need exercise tips for tennis ?
TheLeilisa 1 year ago
No biggie, Federer has done that x1000
MrTennisMenace 1 year ago 3
wide
bls90 1 year ago
that's a winner isn't it? ..... NO!
shonum 1 year ago
whenn in slow motion at the very end it looks out x it mite just b the bounce of it that confuses me he is still relly good player tho no doubt bo0ut it x
RandyOrton4lifexx 1 year ago
WOAHHHH......rodDICKulous
drtman0 1 year ago
what an ugly serve
LUDETUBE007 1 year ago
the announcer was probably waiting ages to use the line "roddickulous"
napoleanboots 1 year ago 7
He is ridiculously a beast!
468Fanta 1 year ago
Roddick is the best :)
jambf2 1 year ago
@jambf2 Yeah that's why he's 2-19 against Federer. :-) You fail.
Nigelxman 1 year ago
that was like a Federer flick!
misterlonely1446 1 year ago
Nice one
yXRampag3Xy 1 year ago
VIKTOR TROICKI!!!
Topola2008 1 year ago
What an ANDYulous shot ! Oh wait a minute..I'm a stupid moron..the others are better LOL
gr8tgoogelymoogely 1 year ago
what a STUPID commentor saying that "roddickulous".
FuhrerKaiser 1 year ago
@FuhrerKaiser that same commentator will say murraculous when murray makes a great shot.
Iwiehavo 1 year ago
i bet the commentor waited all day to say that.. "roddickulous.."
LAME
yeahuuummmno 1 year ago
cocky
peachykeen117 1 year ago
@peachykeen117 not at all.
cj397 1 year ago
i ♥ ANDY he is the best
pimperishstylachic 1 year ago
If he didn't hit such a neutral backhand at 0:15, then he wouldn't have had to even hit that shot.
Geno98 1 year ago
holy shit, i can't even imagine in my head an absolute roddickulous shot like this...thus, i am unable to believe what i just saw and will pretend it never existed.
iwantram3n 1 year ago
who does he think he is? Federer?!
exodus717 1 year ago
great shot, but the commentator killed it after the shot
5025danny 1 year ago
that punchline was roddickulously gay.
ryukenlmaoyes 1 year ago
@ryukenlmaoyes ur roddickulous man
tonmereestgross 1 year ago
roddiculous, just like that lob he hit against nadal at miami recently
eclecticist0 1 year ago
Roddick rules!
keihardgek 1 year ago 3
now that's fast!
ferbonjovi 1 year ago
how did andy roddick get to that point after troicki did the forehand volley into the other side of court den andy roddick got it and get another brilliant backhand volley sliced perfect and andy still went for it and angled it so perfect ............... amazing shot absolutely immaculate and perfect brilliant shot by a brilliant player a 1 in a life time shot by andy roddick i canot believe it is so amazing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:D:D:D:D:):):):)(L)(L)(L)
nikz1996 1 year ago
It almost sounded like the commentator came up with a new term at 25 seconds in, "Roddickulous"
ticklemejoshy85 1 year ago 16
@ticklemejoshy85 he said that :)
TennisVideosOnly 1 month ago
Oh, that's just ridiculous. Absolutely ridiculous XD.
an in the moment shot, fantastic.
McDreich 1 year ago
Nothing special, just RODDICK!
arodfanN1 2 years ago 7
that last shot was beautiful:)
BruceAlmighty1993 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ohhh ro-ddickulous!
JoshDando 2 years ago
Comment removed
JoshDando 2 years ago
Roddicolous! haha
r0baa 2 years ago 134
sweet
TheJackHiggs 2 years ago 5
wooww :)
Sharapova2009 2 years ago
I was there; great shot indeed! A-Rod won against Federer later in that tournament, he was playing really well!
morallies 2 years ago 2
I don´t like Roddick´s play style at all...but he did a fanstastic strike here...
pforgaci 2 years ago 5
That was a really good point by Roddick. and yes you are right. roddick's game is not very pretty to look at. His groundstrokes and movement are not natural ... or fluid like federer's.
tangjkd 2 years ago
Roddick is Roddick people !
oh he has already said it .. roddickulous ! exceptional point , perfect comment !
stillalive1231 2 years ago 21
roddick is fricken amazing. he makes it look so easy
maktird 2 years ago 3
Andy is known for his strong psychological character . But also fastest serve world record ridiculous shots and much endurance during long matches i guess he the only one who can somehow match Federer
stas619 2 years ago
somehow match federer??? the guy gets pawned by fed everytime they play..
odingr 2 years ago
every one gets pawned by fed almost allways just that roddick has much more endurance than other players and against fed it can be useful .. remember the match against Isner ? . at us open .. other player couldn't even get to the fifth set with him ..
stas619 2 years ago 2
yeah but roddick lost to isner right? i mean, i agree with you that he has endurance but his mental game sucks and he's giving away some crucial points(remember the set point he lost at wimbledon with federer? that silly volley...)
odingr 2 years ago
thats got nothing to do with his mental game, at 27 its no longer as big a problem as it used to be, at wimbledon he though fed's shot was gonna go out at the last moment he decided to volley it, and he caught the ball late, end of story
Currymastuh 2 years ago 2
they make it look so easy. i can't even get a first serve in :(
bevoburn 2 years ago 2
dont worry buddy you just need practice like every sport requires :)
13SaintJimmy 2 years ago
thats effffffffing ridiculous
JLTRAIN233 2 years ago
*roddickulous
pepinhoo 2 years ago 7
I saw a rafa forehand then a federer backhand. =]
E121C 2 years ago 4
SO true!!!
ryanrenesis 2 years ago
who
Nrthewave 2 years ago
wow man the last 3 shots of the rally were crazy but, danm he doesnt give up?
iColonel 2 years ago
What a RODDICKulous shot!
Gipshaw 2 years ago 234
that was a very corny thing to say....... but i agree. thumbs up*. also good video upload.
kadazero 2 years ago
@Gipshaw ajjajajaj
xavcrack 1 year ago
@Gipshaw lol i caught that hahahahaahhahahahahaa
tonmereestgross 1 year ago
@Gipshaw, someone had to say it hahahaha.
APH1991 1 year ago
@Gipshaw rofl
cro91Maderfaker 1 year ago
@Gipshaw More like a federer shot!!
FrankShan777 8 months ago
S%^&! Roddick is insane. He just won't give up.
mewmewuniverse 2 years ago
I love how arguments break out over a tennis clip, some one should design a website where everyone can just trash talk each other so they'll stop doing it on youtube
Green34Destiny9 2 years ago 5
I know, seriously. Lol its just so funny how certain people live to comment against others. We honestly don't need nor want a long conversation about luck, everyone has their opinion of it, or racism (on a lot of videos, not this one, but a lot of other ones)
Legolas8811 2 years ago
Ridiculous get by Roddick - just look at the wrist!!
Monsterenergy791 2 years ago
ja complejamente impresionante , ese tipo si sabe correr xD
marktheslamac 2 years ago
cashyr shut the hell up, Tennis shots like that are not like a lottery. That was pure skill, so take your elementary mathematics + simple english and shove it up your egotistical brain.
DahBrohans 2 years ago 7
who said roddick didn't have touch.
EscapedC0nvict 2 years ago 2
i have no idea how the camera man was able to get this
jasoncho92 2 years ago
was on vacation in jamaica when i saw this one point on tv there... and roddick became my favorite player ever since than... lol
gunahhhh 2 years ago
Roddick is my most favourite player since I saw Wimbledon 2009 Finals...
Ilrepastore 2 years ago 2
That was a great match, but Federer played fairly bad for being him, and Roddick played the match of his life, and Federer still won :D
niclassj 2 years ago
Actually, I thought Federer was i top form during the wimby final. He played such a long match and had under 40 unforced errors, 50 aces, over 100 winners! His fastst serve was 135 mph! And his first serve % was around 62. Yeah, I think that's Federer at his best, or almost best. Did I mention he only had 4 unforced errors?
Gipshaw 2 years ago
hers return of serve was off
RogFedFan1 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
good video! but i have to say it is appropriate to say luck is involved for this particular point. the probability of Roddick getting the shot at such an angle is very low. Just think if he were to repeat this 1000 times, how many of those will actually be like the shot now? very low. so yes, luck is involved, but of course so is his skills
Casshyr 2 years ago
just shut up...i hate u ppl coz u all think u know everthing bout tennis, u probably suck at it
charliechip01 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
lol did you even read my msg? i wasn't takling about tennis, i was simply describing what probability means in elementary mathematics
your comment just shows your ignorance in math, what r u, not even out of high school?
Casshyr 2 years ago
lol, dude i think we all realized it was a pretty unlikely shot.. there are just so many ppl like u who try to sound so clever, e.g look a bit below on comments, gueorguijoukov is trying to be a smartass.
charliechip01 2 years ago
no, not everyone realized luck was invovled (e.g. adriangutt). If you did, then I'm sorry, ignore my last comment.
and what's with all the swearing? lol can't have an argument in a civilized tongue?
(and elementary mathematics = simple English, sure maths is more simple to type, but so what? =.=)
Casshyr 2 years ago
another example...elementary mathematics??? why cant u just say maths u ass
charliechip01 2 years ago
totally agree with magnetic. Do you think that skills of a pro is based on luck? That is clearly a though of an amateur who doesn't know the reach of this sport..
adriangutt 2 years ago
everyone here who is even considering luck exists is stupid beyone measure. there is NO luck seriously everything is skill and probability
MrMagneticPelican 2 years ago 6
but don't you gotta get lucky to get the small percentage of the probability to hit that shot?
darthtau 2 years ago
So when a ball hits the top of the net and falls to the other side of the court and you win the point at 7-8 tie break 3 set u dont think you were goddamn lucky?
oskoolsk8 2 years ago
Luck could be considered as a low percentage probability event happening going in your favor. I would say this man would be lucky then.
Considering something else than your claims would rather be a proof of intelligence. Doubting is a clue that you at least think.
This said, claiming something alone is about worthless; showing your statement to be true is useful.
Here, your best argument on whether or not luck exist is.. a statement sayign everythign is skil land probabilities...
GueorguiJoukov 2 years ago
It's fine to claim, but can you demonstrate us something lik, how everything is probabilities and skills?
And, although examples are nice, they don't justify your statement in anyway. Tell me how skills are relevant to our state and how probabilities are related to what happens.
Because you point out stupidity without showing any signs of intelligence. Saying luck is real is as dumb as saying it's not. Same thing goes for atheism and religion.
GueorguiJoukov 2 years ago
So, tell me how and why you are right.
You should first try to get an accurate definition of luck.
But answer me, is your name, your job or your reputation makes a flase statement true because YOU said it? No. A stays A no matter who speak. And what if millions says A, will it make it be Z? No. State remains unchanged. Then, numbers behidn an idea doesn't make it better.
So, does a dictionary have to be consider as right because everyone consider it so? No.
GueorguiJoukov 2 years ago
Then, make up a description of luck and enlight us of your wisdom.
Because if you say what you said, you believe to be inevitably right, because the opposite would imply you are stupid beyond measures .
As you present others as being stupid, I also doubt you are qualifying yourself of dumb since you willingly separated two opposites answers and granted supidity to the opposite camp.
But, tell me how it is stupid beyond measures? Because it's not your answer or is there an other reason?
GueorguiJoukov 2 years ago
Did Roddick win the match??
MattSolo782 2 years ago
Yeah ! I like that !
Ariane184 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Federer does those flicks with his eyes closed all the time!!!!
supermaz2002 2 years ago
Roddiculous 0:24 :D
flashdoom 2 years ago 4
that was pure luck surely...he just went for it
sazzyzed21 2 years ago
Every shot in tennis is luck to some degree. You can have an easy forehand and miss it, it's just that you probably won't. For someone like Federer, it's more like a .7% chance he'd miss an easy forehand. Being better decreases the chance you're going to miss, but it doesn't guarantee anything. The fact that Roddick pulled this off shows that he does indeed have quite a bit of skill. That being said, luck could have played its part in this shot.
someleetguy 2 years ago
hmmmm...ok
sazzyzed21 2 years ago
not pure luck, since he was able to run the ball down and hit the angle by hitting the outside of the ball
au2boys2 2 years ago
You can't call that kind of a shot luck. The only LUCKY shots in tennis are when the ball hits the pole and goes in or clips the top of the net and rolls over or when your ball hits the line and gives your opponent a terrible bounce. Those are luck. But when nothing of those things are in fact and it is just you, the racket, and the ball, how is that luck?
AllGenreMusic 2 years ago 5
HOW DOES HE DO THAT?????
dianalovestennis 2 years ago 5
Roddick's a beast
someleetguy 2 years ago 3
That was a SICK point!
kyle30bech 2 years ago
Never seen something like that before! Roddick FTW.
seksisempanze 2 years ago 5
AMAZING !
GREAT PLAYER !
stillalive1231 2 years ago 4
this is magic fantsatic
Hpartutyun 2 years ago
RODICULOUS!!
richardthethird69 2 years ago 3
wow! what a player! he's just so nice!
warcrevette 2 years ago 8
I love a nice one-handed backhand across court that completely rinses an opponent.
olliescrim 2 years ago 6
He doesn't play like this in the Grand Slams because he's always getting his ass kicked by Federer. ;)
BillClintonn 2 years ago
hardley an ass kicking in the latest final
tedKL 2 years ago 10
Hey -- I like Andy Roddick. Don't get me wrong. But until the latest Wimbledon ... Federer is always in Roddick's head. He just can't beat him.
BillClintonn 2 years ago 8
he had the chance to in the second set tie break thts whn federer got into his head.
liampimp12341234 2 years ago
how come he never manages that in the slams?
naykool 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i dont think he can handle pressure...
mapleric 2 years ago
this is a very nice point!!
Gutschilino 2 years ago 7
too bad roddick doesnt play like this in grand slams lmao
dan19912 2 years ago 3
That's what I call "never give up"
kennyL3010 2 years ago 5
insane
cuntfacedminge 2 years ago 5
rodickulous
Jenzebol 2 years ago 10
pa lako tako protiv troickog
zvezdaso 2 years ago
roddick is a haxor!!!
lol jk NICE!
basketballman112 2 years ago
fucking good shot :D
dvid147 2 years ago 5
RODDICKULOUS! :D
Pixxerrr 2 years ago 26
if only he would play like that everytime... <3
empressxye 2 years ago
thats not verdasco hes playen is it?
usert4 2 years ago
no verdasco is left handed. He's playing Victor Troicki
KoreanMilkman2007 2 years ago
Amazing shot =)
SimplePLan4life23 2 years ago
Federer like
MrDgenerate212 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
One word.. WOW
GuitarHer012345 2 years ago
OMG THAT'S NOT HUMANLY POSSIBLE! well, except for Roddick...
FranciscaMoi 2 years ago 5
he became world no.1 for a reason.
BrotherTree1 2 years ago
For like a sec.
nelvlo 2 years ago
haha. a day.
angeliscooool 2 years ago