Change- Obama announcing he's keeping Bush's tax cuts that are proportionally harder on middle and lower class than the upper class, WHICH he campaigned against.
Change to help the poor- Michelle Obama has spent MILLIONS on shopping sprees, traveling, and vacations. Most of which cold have gone to any number of our programs. How about the failing Social Security? Maybe some reinforcement for that booming postal service we have.
Losing? Is this some sort of competition I was unaware of?
Are the roads you drive on not developed by government and funded by tax payer money? They are in case you didn't know. That means if you are truly against all Socialism, you would not drive your car on state roads, or even walk on them.
Socialism built your road in front of your house. Just because it was during the 80's doesn't make a difference you moron. You payed taxes and the government funded the building of that road. Thus Socialism. The police, firefighters, DOD, Social Security, State roads, it's all Socialized. Do you not like all those things? It's because of Socialism that all those things exist, you stupid fucking idiot. I'm 18 years old and know that. I don't think you finished highschool, asshole.
I should have guessed u were in college. A mouthy opinionated fool. Talk to me when you get out into the real world and trying to make a living. I went to school in Boulder, CO at CU. So many students I met suddenly opened their eyes when they got out of school. U will too dude.
I've had 5 jobs since I was 15. I've worked, and I'll be working part time while in school to pay my own way without loans or grants. So don't talk shit to me about working.
And you call me opinionated? You're the one who makes factless assertions about Obama and probably don't know the difference between Fascism, Socialism, and Capitolism. You are nothing more then an opinion and don't understand political science worth a shit.
Sure, sure, sure. Part time work to fully pay for school....what shit hole school r u going to....
Let's talk on ONE thing Obama said to keep opinion out. TAKING money from the upper class and GIVING it to the lower class is a socialist idea. Yes or no? TAKING money from the upper class and funding his healtcare plan for these shit bags who can't afford it is socialist. AND I do nto agree. That's all I'm sayin kidd-o
You can't have a hybrid between two diametric opposites. Either capital goods are privately owned, with all that private ownership entails, or they're not there's no "hybridization" possible.
How can you say there can't be a hybrid when the U.S. and almost every other Industrialized Nation in the world is a hybrid? I see them more as extremes in their own and putting them together makes for the best system. We are a "Capitolist" nation.
We are a capitalist country with some socialist policies, sure. But this socialism crap started with FDR. Universal Healthcare is socialist because it takes money directly from the wealthy and distributes them directly to the poor. The Police is funded by all taxpayers and helps everybody. The DOD, I assume you mean the Department of Defense, is the same thing. Something is socialist if you take money directly from someone else and give it directly to someone else, like a public HI option.
That's the twisted Right Wing definition. Socialism is any program that is funded by subsidies. Universal Healthcare isn't even in the bill and it doesn't tax only the rich. Get your shit straight.
Oh and Btw. F.D.R. was probably the greatest president this country has ever seen and ever will. He was elected 4 times asshole.
"Any program that is funded by subsidies" is the twisted left wing definition. Actually, there's a lot of definitions, but a defining characteristic of socialism is redistributing the wealth from the rich to the poor. Obama's policies do that.
I never said anything about universal health care, I said something about a public option, which is most certainly in the bill(s). It is proposed to be paid for by taxing the rich and glittering generalities like "reducing waste" and "reducing abuse".
The Public Option is self-sustained through premiums. It's not going to require taxes. We already pay more taxes than anyone in the world for emergency care which is subsidized. If you watch his speech from Wednesday, he addresses these issues specifically. Unless you watch the speech or read the bill you're going to keep getting it wrong.
Btw, that's the actual definition. Socialism is not specifically taking money from the rich. That's just completely wrong.
I don't care. Every single government program has ended up costing much, much more than the politicians said it would. In 1966, the House M&W committee and president Johnson said Medicare would cost an inflation-adjusted $12 billion by 1990. In 1990, it cost $107 billion, 9 times what they said it would cost. I don't trust politicians, which is why I didn't watch Obama's speech. I didn't feel like listening to lies.
Whatever. Then there's no hope of you changing or bettering your ideas and viewpoints if you won't listen to differing points of views. I would watch and listen to all McCain's ideas for reform and agree with a lot of them. You're just not open-minded though...
Why would I listen to lies? Plus, some of us work for a living, I happened to be working on Wednesday night.
I want YOU to explain to ME why Obama is any different than all the other government cronies that drastically underestimate the cost of any program.
Like I said, Medicare costs 9 times what LBJ predicted it would. The hospital subsidy to Medicare in 1987 was projected to cost $100 million. By 1992, it was $11 billion per year.
So why trust Obama when he says a PO will cost nothing?
Because if you do the math, IF the Public Option is successful it will easily save the money just by creating competition. I have every reason to believe the Public Option will be successful. I don't believe him just because he said it will work. I've looked up on it, and it will indeed save a LOT of money in all areas of the Health Industry.
The PO would destroy all competition. It's simple logic. A health insurance company can't compete with something that doesn't pay taxes, doesn't worry about making a profit, etc. The public option would force health insurance companies out of business, leaving Americans with no choice but to enroll in the government plan.
Another question: How can we cover 30 million new patients without hiring new doctors?
It won't destroy all competition by any means. Worst case scenario it would be like Education. Most kids go to Public Schools but if a family is upper class and wants a different and possibly better learning environment, they can enroll their children in Private schools. I don't think it will even go that far with health insurance. Some people like the coverage they have and will keep it. Some will switch over. The only thing that's indefinite is that costs will go down for everyone.
See, that's the problem with it. Sure, it has good intentions, but this thing could turn into a monster. I still think it will kill competition and that it's something we shouldn't try.
However, I have read up on the whole health insurance co-op project and I fully endorse it. It's a concept cooked up in free-market principles, and the government is only involved by providing seed money. And controlling costs? There are currently people in small co-ops that pay about $50 a month for insurance.
It might kill competition, that's true. It's a possibility, but I just see it as an unlikely one. The reason I like the Public Option and the reason you appear to dislike it is how drastic it is. The system we have now has already self-destructed and needs a drastic change. I have little issue with the system being Socialized honestly. I wouldn't want to do that now, because that's way over the top.
As far as Co-op goes, I don't know much about it, so I can't really disagree or agree.
We need drastic change, but I think the co-ops are the way to go. Many people are "insured" right now, but that doesn't mean they get good coverage. They're going to see that the PO is much cheaper and will probably cover more stuff, so they'll jump on the bandwagon, and eventually the PO will be the only option. I don't want to take that chance.
Read up on the co-op concept. This would work and would end up making costs a LOT cheaper than the PO ever could.
The Co-op mainly tries to improve the system we have now. It's good reform don't get me wrong, but I don't think it goes far enough. This system just hasn't worked and it needs to be changed in some way, not just fixed. PO will never be the only option. Even if it would get close to that point, what are you afraid the government is going to do with that? They don't get to profit off of it. Veterans, Medicare, and Medicaid have government involved. The PO is the right direction to go.
I'm more concerned about the cost. We can't afford Medicare and Medicaid, how on Earth are we going to afford the PO if it extends to everyone?
Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, and a public health insurance option are all nice things to have, but the simple fact is that we can't afford any of them.
Wait a minute...where on Earth did you find that? If "slowing rising costs of private insurance" will save $4 trillion, than slowing it by 1% would save $400 trillion? 100% would be $40 quadrillion? I think you've read something wrong...
And if a family is lower class and wants to have a choice as to whether or not their tax dollars support the public school system or another school of their choice, FLMotorcross' union monopolist buddies will kneecap them at every opportunity in order to protect their robber baron monopoly.
The 47 million patients (correct # of uninsured) aren't getting coverage now. I doubt those people are just going to rush into the hospital with insurance. They still have to pay premiums for their insurance, and those premiums are relative to the amount of care they will need. This bill improves a lot of the Health Industry in other ways that will attract more doctor's, nurses, etc. in the future. With our current system we are predicted to have a 33% shortage of doctors by 2025.
Social Security, FDR's pet, currently is the single biggest expenditure in the U.S. budget. I would love social security and free health care, but we can't afford it. And before you go off and say we shouldn't be spending money on wars, the cost of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars is $900 billion, enough to pay for Social Security for less than a year. Everyone loved FDR because he gave them all the shit they wanted. They didn't think about future cost. FDR screwed this country.
Iraq and Afghanistan only $900 billion? That's a complete lie. The entire Healthcare package is not going to interfere with the S.S. trust, and it will create stricter laws against what we pay now for emergency patients taking from those funds. Obama's bill is going to solve the Social Security dilemma we have.
Private roads exist, bounty hunting exists, private defense contractors exist, fully funded pensions that won't go bankrupt like Social Security exist and I'm sure there's private firefighting firms out there too.
To say that none of these things could have existed without socialism is retarded.
Well I guess if you're a Christian extremist and a racist and want to just exterminate Muslims like Hitler did to the Jews, then Blackwater is a very successful "Business" indeed.
This is not the first evidence I have seen or heard about how on January 20, 2009 the second Miracle of Cana will occur. Obama will multiply the loaves and fishes. Everyones cupboard will be filled. All boats will be lifted on a tide that carries with it an abundance of free food from the sea and free wine from the vineyard. All praise to the Messiah.
The only thing that will not be lifted is the average IQ of the Obama believer. The let down is going to be severe and possible damaging.
insanity. how can people think any kind of economy can be run on this basis? funny how the bank was good enough for you to TAKE the loan from. heaven forbid you should repay the money you owe!
Don't they know some of his OWN family lives in Gov. run down housing. Obama Has Billions he "aint" going to help no one. Its ALL about him in his mind.
OH MY GOD! This is one of the stupidest videos that I heard in a while! It reminds me of the one with the black woman saying that she won't have to buy gas or pay her mortgage anymore.
Obama is going to pay for my tuition, and he is going to pay for my car, apartment, food, insurance, and give me lots of spending money. No sense in working, obama is only going to tax you. Quit your job and get free money from obama. No one has to work, everything is FREE!
Empty headed Obama worshipers like this are certainly in for a rude awakening.
Once they figure out that the chosen one isn't going to pay off their car loans, fill their gas tank, or make their mortgage payment I'm sure they'll be coming to your and my house to collect what they believe they're entitled to.
So, "peacekeeping forces" under the dumacrats are a better idea? Whatever. The USA needs to get out of the country building business. We have things here that are going to need our attention when Obama screws up.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Well I'm not sure if your saying that to me but.Funding terrorists organizations and then silencing anybody on the streets that proves that,is much worse than peacekeeping forces.You are so brainwashed because i know you love having the ability to place blame and call names like "liberal,socialist" because calling names makes you feel better about yourself,its ok,call me a liberal.Because when republican start to lose arguments they wip that out quick!
oh my goodness--I didn't know PE BO promised us that if he became President, he'd make us rich--if I'd known that, I would have more seriously contemplated voting for him! LOL ") Bobby Jindal 2012
price of gas repub:$3.07/gallou democ:$1.39/gallou cost of college $3.161 per year(demo) $5.192 per year (rep) personal savings rate: democrat:+2.3% republic:-0.5% consumer credit debt: $7.65trillion(democrat) $12.8 TRILLION(REPUB
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
cp3w00=brainwashed by republicans.The United States government, under Ronald Reagan and George Bush Sr, trained and financed the Taliban and Osama bin Laden. Now, that the Taliban and al Qaeda turned against the United States, rightwing ideologues and republicans want to silence anybody who points it out.Because it means their half of the arguement in a matter of seconds.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
WELLFEDAMERICAN-cannot understand that everytime i answered his question he jumps to another topic,just to feel he won,but he left the arguement meaning i won by default
Assuming they would have been renewed anyway, Obama's plan would bring in an additional $700 billion in taxes over the next 10 years, while McCain's would cost the Treasury $600 billion. Assuming legislators would have let the tax breaks expire, Obama's plan would cost the U.S. Treasury $2.7 trillion and McCain's $3.7 trillion
If you think for a split second that McCain would have spent more than Obama, I'll just end it now cause it's not even worth discussing. Those numbers you throw around mean nothing, just like Obama's tax promises. Obama has no clue what he's going to spent, except it will be a lot. He just proposed the largest new investment in roads and bridges since President Dwight D. Eisenhower built the Interstate system in the late 1950s.
Woah there Buddy,If the candidates don't know how much they will spend,Then why do you come with? "McCain would'nt spend more than obama"
Gotcha there pal! Because McCain spending more of tax payer dollars of over 12-13 billion a MONTH for a war,when we can just shift the responsibility to the 400,000 troops we have trained for the iraqis,The numbers i Throw around are obivously not random numbers they put on their budget list,its the estimated cost.
EXCUSES, get them ready. McCain is over. Bush will leave soon. Get the excuses ready. Prepare to defend your messiah. You have not "dissed" (OOPS i am being racist again LOL) anyone but yourself by babbling on and on about Bush and McCain and how nothing will be your god Obamas fault. Warm up the million excuse bus. Here we go!
Look at the Redneck,(OOPS WHEN I SAY THIS I'M A RASCIST,BUT YOU ARE NOT?)Once proven wrong its that Same old "McCain is over" once he has nothing more to defend after being torn apart so many times in arguements with me Litterally look at every arguement he cannot deliver correctly.,Obama hasn't been sworn in and you idiots cannot keep your mouths shut,
Because you want to hold Obama accountable for EVERYTHING
But you rascist idiots never state Bush involvment in the crisis
What, we can't make fun of anyone who's a dumbass because their black anymore? I know that's what you, Jesse Jackson, and the white-guilt liberals probably want, but that's not freedom.
I reserve the right to make fun of anyone, including blacks.
Lastly, for the record, calling him a redneck would equate to him calling you a nigger, and I haven't seen that happen yet. So you better take a deeper look at your racists claim, as it appears you are the biggest one.
Calling somebody a dumbass,because of they way they talk?,pretty damn rascist to me,If you cannot see that you are a moron.SIMPLE."calling him a redneck would equate to him calling you a nigger,"Not only do i appreciate your language in that sentence, In society the system of rascism,blacks have never been treated as fairly as whites have,so redneck should mean nothing to him.He walks into a store nobody says anything,I do,they hafe to act like they need to clean something where i am standing,.
You can't be serious? If you were to laugh at some old country boy talking, I wouldn't cry racist. You are just overly sensitive, thanks to a media that has taught you to be the victim.
Also, if a white person was to call another one a redneck, and it's ok. Please explain to me how that's any different than a black man calling another black man a nigger?
Last time I checked, you all were calling each other that about 10000% more than we were.
If you think black people love the media you hafe to be kidding me....the way they have portrayed us during the hurricanes,If you keep acting like no history is relevant,and white people have the short end of the stick,i cannot explain to you,but.I have never endorsed using the n word with my homies,i would just say homies.Simple.
I never said whites had the short end of the stick, do you make things up as you go? I simply don't subscribe to the "poor black man" theory. Blacks are every bit as capable of being successful in this country as whites.
Is there a history of suppressing the blacks? yep, but the same can be said about the Irish, the Chinese, and countless other races, so why is it we only hear you complaining? get over it already and prove to the racists that what they think is false.
Have the chinese,irish,and countless other races been oppressed and turned down jobs for their skin color? Have the Chinese Irish,And coutnless other races get millions of guns,hundreds of liquor stores,in their community?no.If i were to put what you said in a third graders term,you pretty much said you have the short end of the stick "They had more than i did"
Do you have any clue to American history? The Irish and Chinese got treated like second class citizens because of their RACE. PLEASE PLEASE educate yourself because you are looking like a tool.
As for the liquor and guns stores? Who's fault is that? If no one bought them, the store would fail. How come it's normally orientals that run them? People who come to this country with nothing can make it, why can't blacks? Oh that's right, because you are victims and deserve it for free. I got it now.
If you are living in a community where it's virtually nothing to do when you come home,have no money,what are you most likely to do if it's there?The day care system is a gang system.I have worked with youth of color convicing them to put away the guns and get some food,It works for some,others it doesn't,crime should not be defined by one race,so why is it that you say black people need to wake up and solve their problems,when every race goes through the same thing.
Very simple, to most of us anyway, but I'll go over it with you again.
Republicans = Lower taxes, smaller government
Democrats = Higher taxes, larger government.
Sorry bub, but that's the way it's always been.
As for the war, Democrat and Republican, it would have happened. Again, this requires an open mind to understand. When the war was started, 80+% of Americans backed it. Combine that with the fact that most power players, including democrats have gone on record..
Republicans:tax everyone,evan people who cannot keep their homes.How else do rich people stay rich.Under these conditions
Democrats:tax the rich so that the poor have an oppuruinty to pay for health care and other things without worrying about taxes,
Ofcourse everybody is going to back it up to ensure that we won't lose more family during 9/11,but when bush took our tax dollars,helped kill 4,000,troops,65000,wounded,got us into a big finanical crisis it became unpopular.
Ok man, I'm done with you, say whatever you want since you obviously have a very not only flawed logic, but information as well. EVERYTHING you say is straight from an Obama speech, and it's damn near all BS.
Do yourself a favor and do a google search for -
income taxes under clinton and bush
And realize the truth. Funny how even someone making as low as 30k pays LESS tax now then they did 8 years ago under Clinton. And Clinton was a moderate democrat and not a liberal. I'm done man.
(cont) as saying Saddam was a threat and needed to be taken care of. Funny thing is though, when the war got unpopular, seems MOST democrats backstepped and that started criticizing bush. Only a few democrats such as Liberman and Zell Miller stood like men and continued to support it even though their party had shun them.
Look, I admire you passion, but I suggest you read up for a while because the only thing I'm hearing is Obama talking points, like found on his web or through some liberallt biased source.
I could sit here and do the same. I could go to McCains site and do the same, but any real pundits would laugh me off the page. There's a huge difference in what politicians say and do, and one only needs to look at their voting record and beliefs of the party. Both off which I'm criticizing Obama for.
The 95 percent-plus of the American population that earns less than $250,000 would see the following tax breaks: A $500-per-worker tax credit for people who earn less than $150,000 and do not itemize, and a $4,000 credit per child in college. Seniors who earn less than $50,000 would pay no income tax.
Too bad 40% of the population dont even pay taxes. Hmm, that means that the rich alone are not going absorb it all, guess who will? Yep, you got it, the middle class. Obama's numbers don't work, period.
Fact is, and this can be verified, that people pay LESS tax now under Bush, then they did under Clinton. And that's people making as little as 30k. That is the inconvenient truth about Democrats, sorry to burst the hype bubble.
The rich would pay more under Barack Obama's tax plan, and the poor and middle-class would pay less, a nonpartisan analysis finds. Under John McCain's plan, the rich would pay much less than they do now, the poor and middle-class would pay a bit less, and the federal deficit would grow, the study found.
Each individual's tax situation is different, so it's hard to say for sure how much more or less you would pay under the presidential candidates' ever-evolving tax proposals
• Obama was the only national leader or institution with a net positive rating on handling the Wall Street crisis in a USA TODAY/Gallup Poll taken Friday and Saturday — 46% approved, 43% disapproved. For McCain, the numbers were 37% approve, 58% disapprove. Democratic and GOP congressional leaders, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and President Bush also did poorly
You do realize that Obama is leaving Bush's tax rates in place right, and they won't expire til at least 2010. Funny how this is EXACTLY what McCain said he would do. Makes you think who was right all along.
Only someone with no understanding of economics would support Obama's tax plan. It's a joke, and would further cripple our economy. It seems someone got through to him and told him it wasn't a good idea.
Well really since you can only post a 500 word discription,i will gladly argue with you through messages,and destroy you.WELLFEDAMERICAN,still has no answers to:
McCain continueing to spend 13billion dollars a month in iraq when we are in deficit,and they have a surplus.Will that not further rip us apart? It's like i said People are getting taxed no matter what.Obama wants to tax rich people more and poor people less.McCain disagrees.
lordvoldemort578 "I'm Sick of this crap people keep saying "Oh that Obama thinks he can pay peoples car payments",No despite what you have heard from your idiotic rascist friends,Barack Obama would like to lower taxes for working people,and create jobs so that we can get to middle class back on track,He never said "I will pay peoples car payments" If we are in a billion dollars deficit,why would john McCain keep spening 12 billion dollars in iraq with their 80billion dollar surplus?"
I want to publicly say that I accidentally went to "reply" to one of lordvoldemort578's comments and hit the "remove" by accident. This wasn't intentional as I fully believe in the right of free speech. My apologies
"The most important thing is for us to find Osama bin Laden. It is our number one priority and we will not rest until we find him." —Washington, D.C., Sept. 13, 2001
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority." — George W. Bush March 13, 2002
If this were a dictatorship, itd be a heck of a lot easier just as long as Im the dictator." George W. Bush
As soon as he steps in office, yep, he is then accountable. Or does that only matter when it's a republican in office?
And please, Give the race card a break Jesse. If Obama was 100% white, he'd get the same treatment. Fact is, he's a left leaning liberal with suspicious ties, a shady background, and no experience.
I hate when people say "Don't use the race card".Then you pull it out on republicans like they have had the short end of the stick? Name one republican who was left with billions of dollars deficit to take care of.'As soon as he steps in office, yep, he is then accountable. Or does that only matter when it's a republican in office?"Feeble attempt at turning around my question,That you rascist idiots want to hold Him responsible? But Bush didn't deserve any part in the crisis?
Yeah well, just tell me why Wall Street needs a bailout as expensive as world war 2 and no one can spare the 1000.00 for the car, that would stimulate the economy, she could buy some groceries instead of the man, a banker, some ahole charging 30%. So da the other side of the issue. Obama represents hope to her, fair enough, better that than whitey the smarmy whiner always dissing everything.
Any why should anyone spare the $1000 for the car? She signed the contract to pay, couldn't pay, car goes bye bye end of story. This isn't a black white thing, this isn't a rich poor thing, this isn't even a thing about the continual decline of our federal government. This is an individual who was irresponsible, and will have to accept the consequences thereof.
fuck this ghetto trash bitch. maybe if she didn't sit her ass at home and collect food stamps and get free hand outs and she actually got her ghetto ass up and got herself a job then maybe she could pay the car loan and not have to worry about shit obama giving her money
They turn against Obama and start calling him an Uncle Tom. Much like they do all intelligent, free thinking, Black leaders who don't subscribe to their thinking.
What can my country do for me? Should be the new slogan of their party.More entitlements, health insurance,new homes,free food,free energy.What's next?Who's going to want to work then?
LOL...I better start planning my financial portfolio..after the windfall I receive from the "savior" Blowbama..I'll need to have help in securing my millions....snicker..snicker..
Your messiah not looking so good now? What happened to taxing the rich? The tax cuts are going to be allowed to expire. Get ready for more broken promises. It will be intresting to see what you fools posts after he is in office for a few months. Its too bad our first black President has to be this fool instead of a worthy American citizen. Your BOYEE gonna be gone in 4. I am going to hold Obama responsible for EVERYTHING that happens to this country while he is in office. Get those excuses ready
Another stereotype from a man who will not claim he isn't a rascist:"Your BOYEE gonna be gone in 4"Pathic you cannot admit..Secondly,The man you would have elected would have kept things the way they we're,how else would he be able to let rich people keep their wealth without taxing a lower class?And for this "taxing rich people" crap,There is no united states of america unless you tax people,its a question of who you want to tax,poor people? or rich people?thirdly,(CONTINUED)
Why is BOYEEE racist when I say it but not when you say it? Pathetic liberal double standard. Get those Obama excuses ready, here come da busted promise train. "Yes we can! yes we can! yes we can!" ROFLMFAO
I hate when you people try to inflict the same emotion you got when i dissed you so bad on the last message,back to me.Pathetic attempt,"here come da busted promise train"
Mtninfidel proving his rascism by judgeing peoples way of talking evan if they have no control over it,You arent just speaking to me,Your saying that to all black people who had to live in harsh conditions,You are to stuborn,no matter how much i tell how McCAIN WILL BE THE WORSE PRESIDENT,You continue with hate.
Seriously, you just make yourself look like an ass. Obama's record speaks for itself, the only thing you have are his promises and he's already broken the biggest one - Taxes.
Just so you know, I grew up poor myself in a city with many blacks. The route I took in life could have been achieved by anyone, regardless of color. So cry me a river about the poor blacks. With all the special grants, funds, and affirmative action available, they had more opportunity than I did.
I thought Obama was supposed to make our car payments for us. I am going to hold him to ALL his promises. Get your excuses ready liberals. I am LMFAO at ALL you liberal dumbasses who voted for this fool. Great job numb nuts. This will guarantee a Republican victory in 2012.
The biggest joke of this is one of Obama's aides has recently released a statement saying they will probably let Bush's tax cuts run their course til 2010.
BTW, "this year"? As in what's left of it? Was there a Barack Obama "I'll make you rich in a Month" scheme I missed out on? Not even president yet and he can make people rich... Man...
OMG!!!What state is this in? I mean here in NY ,We the peolpe have already renamed a school after Obama. We have no money for BOOKS. but hell we have money for a new sign?
Don't forget the stamps, coins and plates. I suppose they will have Obama head Christmas balls too, only Hussein doesn't celebrate Christmas. Maybe he celebrates Kwanza, but that's not even a real African holiday. They made it up to get another holiday off.
This has been flagged as spam show
Ron Paul 2012
rustardj 6 months ago
Change- Obama announcing he's keeping Bush's tax cuts that are proportionally harder on middle and lower class than the upper class, WHICH he campaigned against.
Change to help the poor- Michelle Obama has spent MILLIONS on shopping sprees, traveling, and vacations. Most of which cold have gone to any number of our programs. How about the failing Social Security? Maybe some reinforcement for that booming postal service we have.
Politicians suck. Both parties.
RandomDudeYouKnow 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1 day ago
I took this same audio, and chopped it up, made a cartoon out of it with this lady talking to a customer service rep..
Miotch007 1 year ago
These brown sugars are learning quick. obama not gonna make em rich. LOL!
SaveRepublic 2 years ago
*remember watching this vid shortly after it was uploaded*
Is she rich yet?
SestrenNK 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WHERE IS MY MONEY OBAMA????
DarthCybie 2 years ago
What does this nigger think? Her welfare check is going to go from $800 a month to $80,000 a month?
Avatarblackwolf 2 years ago 2
People like you are the problem with America.
IFloridaMotocrossI 2 years ago
UGH, where is nigger Obama helping you out lady? How about getting a JOB and not depending on a socialist cunt of a man to help u?
TxBoarHunter 2 years ago
You know everytime you drive your car you're utilizing Socialism, right? You idiot....
IFloridaMotocrossI 2 years ago
OK? Explain that to me Florida???? PLEASE explain it. U r losing already sweetie.....trust me
TxBoarHunter 2 years ago
Losing? Is this some sort of competition I was unaware of?
Are the roads you drive on not developed by government and funded by tax payer money? They are in case you didn't know. That means if you are truly against all Socialism, you would not drive your car on state roads, or even walk on them.
Stick to hunting Boar you ignorant fuck.
IFloridaMotocrossI 2 years ago
ALLLLLRIGHT. So you are saying Socialism built the road out in front of my house in the 80s?
Jesus dude. Out of all the points you could have made, that was one that made NO sense
TxBoarHunter 2 years ago
You obviously don't even know what the definition of Socialism is. Your fucking stupid.
IFloridaMotocrossI 2 years ago
LMAO! Nice way to end your argument, you are as intelligent as this woman.
TxBoarHunter 2 years ago
Socialism built your road in front of your house. Just because it was during the 80's doesn't make a difference you moron. You payed taxes and the government funded the building of that road. Thus Socialism. The police, firefighters, DOD, Social Security, State roads, it's all Socialized. Do you not like all those things? It's because of Socialism that all those things exist, you stupid fucking idiot. I'm 18 years old and know that. I don't think you finished highschool, asshole.
IFloridaMotocrossI 2 years ago
U do not need to tell me u r in high school...I know it.
R u saying in we r a socialist country in the 80s, 90s, and today now that we have Obama? Yes or no?
TxBoarHunter 2 years ago
I'm not in Highschool, I'm in college.
We are a Capitolist and Socialist country. Always have been. Why would you consider Universal Healthcare Socialist and not the Police or DOD?
IFloridaMotocrossI 2 years ago
I should have guessed u were in college. A mouthy opinionated fool. Talk to me when you get out into the real world and trying to make a living. I went to school in Boulder, CO at CU. So many students I met suddenly opened their eyes when they got out of school. U will too dude.
TxBoarHunter 2 years ago 3
I've had 5 jobs since I was 15. I've worked, and I'll be working part time while in school to pay my own way without loans or grants. So don't talk shit to me about working.
And you call me opinionated? You're the one who makes factless assertions about Obama and probably don't know the difference between Fascism, Socialism, and Capitolism. You are nothing more then an opinion and don't understand political science worth a shit.
Educate yourself, before opening your mouth.
IFloridaMotocrossI 2 years ago
Sure, sure, sure. Part time work to fully pay for school....what shit hole school r u going to....
Let's talk on ONE thing Obama said to keep opinion out. TAKING money from the upper class and GIVING it to the lower class is a socialist idea. Yes or no? TAKING money from the upper class and funding his healtcare plan for these shit bags who can't afford it is socialist. AND I do nto agree. That's all I'm sayin kidd-o
TxBoarHunter 2 years ago
Yeah it's Socialist. So what? Clinton taxed the rich harsher than Obama is now, and the economy grew strongly.
You have some weak ass arguments.
IFloridaMotocrossI 2 years ago
And the housing market is a very large part for our economy sucking a dick right now aannnnnd can you tell me who is responsible for that?
Have you ever had your opinion changed by argueing on YT? Do you really think either one of us was going to change the other point of view?
TxBoarHunter 2 years ago
"Capitolist"? lol ok there buddy.
BigDaddyBongos 2 years ago
Capitolism is a hybrid of Socialism and Capitalism. Looks like you're the illiterate one.....
IFloridaMotocrossI 2 years ago
Lol, as much as you want it to be, "Capitolism" is not a word.
Drahthaar422 2 years ago
Capitolism is a word. Look it up.
IFloridaMotocrossI 2 years ago
You can't have a hybrid between two diametric opposites. Either capital goods are privately owned, with all that private ownership entails, or they're not there's no "hybridization" possible.
Again, you're illiterate.
BigDaddyBongos 2 years ago
How can you say there can't be a hybrid when the U.S. and almost every other Industrialized Nation in the world is a hybrid? I see them more as extremes in their own and putting them together makes for the best system. We are a "Capitolist" nation.
IFloridaMotocrossI 2 years ago
We are a capitalist country with some socialist policies, sure. But this socialism crap started with FDR. Universal Healthcare is socialist because it takes money directly from the wealthy and distributes them directly to the poor. The Police is funded by all taxpayers and helps everybody. The DOD, I assume you mean the Department of Defense, is the same thing. Something is socialist if you take money directly from someone else and give it directly to someone else, like a public HI option.
Drahthaar422 2 years ago
That's the twisted Right Wing definition. Socialism is any program that is funded by subsidies. Universal Healthcare isn't even in the bill and it doesn't tax only the rich. Get your shit straight.
Oh and Btw. F.D.R. was probably the greatest president this country has ever seen and ever will. He was elected 4 times asshole.
IFloridaMotocrossI 2 years ago
"Any program that is funded by subsidies" is the twisted left wing definition. Actually, there's a lot of definitions, but a defining characteristic of socialism is redistributing the wealth from the rich to the poor. Obama's policies do that.
I never said anything about universal health care, I said something about a public option, which is most certainly in the bill(s). It is proposed to be paid for by taxing the rich and glittering generalities like "reducing waste" and "reducing abuse".
Drahthaar422 2 years ago
The Public Option is self-sustained through premiums. It's not going to require taxes. We already pay more taxes than anyone in the world for emergency care which is subsidized. If you watch his speech from Wednesday, he addresses these issues specifically. Unless you watch the speech or read the bill you're going to keep getting it wrong.
Btw, that's the actual definition. Socialism is not specifically taking money from the rich. That's just completely wrong.
IFloridaMotocrossI 2 years ago
I don't care. Every single government program has ended up costing much, much more than the politicians said it would. In 1966, the House M&W committee and president Johnson said Medicare would cost an inflation-adjusted $12 billion by 1990. In 1990, it cost $107 billion, 9 times what they said it would cost. I don't trust politicians, which is why I didn't watch Obama's speech. I didn't feel like listening to lies.
Drahthaar422 2 years ago
Whatever. Then there's no hope of you changing or bettering your ideas and viewpoints if you won't listen to differing points of views. I would watch and listen to all McCain's ideas for reform and agree with a lot of them. You're just not open-minded though...
IFloridaMotocrossI 2 years ago
Nice cop out. When you can't win an argument, just call your opponent closed-minded and walk away.
Drahthaar422 2 years ago
You're the one who copped out when you decided to not watch Obama's speech.
IFloridaMotocrossI 2 years ago
Why would I listen to lies? Plus, some of us work for a living, I happened to be working on Wednesday night.
I want YOU to explain to ME why Obama is any different than all the other government cronies that drastically underestimate the cost of any program.
Like I said, Medicare costs 9 times what LBJ predicted it would. The hospital subsidy to Medicare in 1987 was projected to cost $100 million. By 1992, it was $11 billion per year.
So why trust Obama when he says a PO will cost nothing?
Drahthaar422 2 years ago
Because if you do the math, IF the Public Option is successful it will easily save the money just by creating competition. I have every reason to believe the Public Option will be successful. I don't believe him just because he said it will work. I've looked up on it, and it will indeed save a LOT of money in all areas of the Health Industry.
IFloridaMotocrossI 2 years ago
The PO would destroy all competition. It's simple logic. A health insurance company can't compete with something that doesn't pay taxes, doesn't worry about making a profit, etc. The public option would force health insurance companies out of business, leaving Americans with no choice but to enroll in the government plan.
Another question: How can we cover 30 million new patients without hiring new doctors?
Drahthaar422 2 years ago
It won't destroy all competition by any means. Worst case scenario it would be like Education. Most kids go to Public Schools but if a family is upper class and wants a different and possibly better learning environment, they can enroll their children in Private schools. I don't think it will even go that far with health insurance. Some people like the coverage they have and will keep it. Some will switch over. The only thing that's indefinite is that costs will go down for everyone.
IFloridaMotocrossI 2 years ago
See, that's the problem with it. Sure, it has good intentions, but this thing could turn into a monster. I still think it will kill competition and that it's something we shouldn't try.
However, I have read up on the whole health insurance co-op project and I fully endorse it. It's a concept cooked up in free-market principles, and the government is only involved by providing seed money. And controlling costs? There are currently people in small co-ops that pay about $50 a month for insurance.
Drahthaar422 2 years ago
It might kill competition, that's true. It's a possibility, but I just see it as an unlikely one. The reason I like the Public Option and the reason you appear to dislike it is how drastic it is. The system we have now has already self-destructed and needs a drastic change. I have little issue with the system being Socialized honestly. I wouldn't want to do that now, because that's way over the top.
As far as Co-op goes, I don't know much about it, so I can't really disagree or agree.
IFloridaMotocrossI 2 years ago
We need drastic change, but I think the co-ops are the way to go. Many people are "insured" right now, but that doesn't mean they get good coverage. They're going to see that the PO is much cheaper and will probably cover more stuff, so they'll jump on the bandwagon, and eventually the PO will be the only option. I don't want to take that chance.
Read up on the co-op concept. This would work and would end up making costs a LOT cheaper than the PO ever could.
Drahthaar422 2 years ago
The Co-op mainly tries to improve the system we have now. It's good reform don't get me wrong, but I don't think it goes far enough. This system just hasn't worked and it needs to be changed in some way, not just fixed. PO will never be the only option. Even if it would get close to that point, what are you afraid the government is going to do with that? They don't get to profit off of it. Veterans, Medicare, and Medicaid have government involved. The PO is the right direction to go.
IFloridaMotocrossI 2 years ago
I'm more concerned about the cost. We can't afford Medicare and Medicaid, how on Earth are we going to afford the PO if it extends to everyone?
Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, and a public health insurance option are all nice things to have, but the simple fact is that we can't afford any of them.
Drahthaar422 2 years ago
If the PO just slows rising costs of Private Insurance by .01% it will save 4 trillion dollars.
It will definitely save money. There's no question about that.
IFloridaMotocrossI 2 years ago
Wait a minute...where on Earth did you find that? If "slowing rising costs of private insurance" will save $4 trillion, than slowing it by 1% would save $400 trillion? 100% would be $40 quadrillion? I think you've read something wrong...
Drahthaar422 2 years ago
And if a family is lower class and wants to have a choice as to whether or not their tax dollars support the public school system or another school of their choice, FLMotorcross' union monopolist buddies will kneecap them at every opportunity in order to protect their robber baron monopoly.
BigDaddyBongos 2 years ago
Are you suggesting we privatize the entire education system?
IFloridaMotocrossI 2 years ago
BigDaddyBongos
Did you get your Obamabucks yet so you can quit your job & stay home & watch the Messiah speeches?
I'm still waiting for mine.Cant wait to be rich.
Avatarblackwolf 2 years ago
The 47 million patients (correct # of uninsured) aren't getting coverage now. I doubt those people are just going to rush into the hospital with insurance. They still have to pay premiums for their insurance, and those premiums are relative to the amount of care they will need. This bill improves a lot of the Health Industry in other ways that will attract more doctor's, nurses, etc. in the future. With our current system we are predicted to have a 33% shortage of doctors by 2025.
IFloridaMotocrossI 2 years ago
Social Security, FDR's pet, currently is the single biggest expenditure in the U.S. budget. I would love social security and free health care, but we can't afford it. And before you go off and say we shouldn't be spending money on wars, the cost of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars is $900 billion, enough to pay for Social Security for less than a year. Everyone loved FDR because he gave them all the shit they wanted. They didn't think about future cost. FDR screwed this country.
Drahthaar422 2 years ago
Iraq and Afghanistan only $900 billion? That's a complete lie. The entire Healthcare package is not going to interfere with the S.S. trust, and it will create stricter laws against what we pay now for emergency patients taking from those funds. Obama's bill is going to solve the Social Security dilemma we have.
Just read the bill, please.
IFloridaMotocrossI 2 years ago
Private roads exist, bounty hunting exists, private defense contractors exist, fully funded pensions that won't go bankrupt like Social Security exist and I'm sure there's private firefighting firms out there too.
To say that none of these things could have existed without socialism is retarded.
BigDaddyBongos 2 years ago
Blackwater did a real good job in Iraq didn't they? Haha, all these programs benefit the rich. Get your head out of your ass.
IFloridaMotocrossI 2 years ago
Yup they did. And it didn't take socialism for Blackwater to exist. My point stands, fist-humper.
BigDaddyBongos 2 years ago
Well I guess if you're a Christian extremist and a racist and want to just exterminate Muslims like Hitler did to the Jews, then Blackwater is a very successful "Business" indeed.
IFloridaMotocrossI 2 years ago
Was that the only thing you had left? The race card? Bwhahahahaha.
BigDaddyBongos 2 years ago
You're illiterate.
BigDaddyBongos 2 years ago
WERE IS MY DAMN MONEY OBAMA?
DarthCybie 2 years ago 2
LOL, I've heard worse.
BlueSkies360 2 years ago
This is not the first evidence I have seen or heard about how on January 20, 2009 the second Miracle of Cana will occur. Obama will multiply the loaves and fishes. Everyones cupboard will be filled. All boats will be lifted on a tide that carries with it an abundance of free food from the sea and free wine from the vineyard. All praise to the Messiah.
The only thing that will not be lifted is the average IQ of the Obama believer. The let down is going to be severe and possible damaging.
Avatarblackwolf 2 years ago
Just wait till Nobama gets back from Paris, He will make you rich.
Avatarblackwolf 2 years ago
The Knucklehead of the Day award goes to the lady in this video.
sixletter 2 years ago
Someone tell this Nobama voter that she will not be rich this year. Her money went to GM.
Avatarblackwolf 2 years ago 3
I wish I could get her phone # so I call her and laugh my fucking ass off at her.
Do you wonder if Nobama ever heard this? You know he knows of the one who thinks he is going to pay for her gas & house.
Avatarblackwolf 2 years ago 3
insanity. how can people think any kind of economy can be run on this basis? funny how the bank was good enough for you to TAKE the loan from. heaven forbid you should repay the money you owe!
kasyapa 3 years ago 2
She shoud just say "we paid half of it back at one place and the other place -we'all paid half there as well"
.
Its over baby !
Cheers.
NEBUKEDNEZZA 2 years ago
ROFL.
jvittetoe 3 years ago
Well I can honestly say that after hearing this, politicians like Ron Paul have no chance of ever winning an election
runned 3 years ago 2
look i didnt vote for obama either buy you dont got be pulling shit out of your ass like this grow up
uscgjesse 3 years ago
sure you didn't
WELLFEDAMERICAN 3 years ago
Don't they know some of his OWN family lives in Gov. run down housing. Obama Has Billions he "aint" going to help no one. Its ALL about him in his mind.
timm9 3 years ago 8
OH MY GOD! This is one of the stupidest videos that I heard in a while! It reminds me of the one with the black woman saying that she won't have to buy gas or pay her mortgage anymore.
utubefavorsdems 3 years ago 7
Obama is going to pay for my tuition, and he is going to pay for my car, apartment, food, insurance, and give me lots of spending money. No sense in working, obama is only going to tax you. Quit your job and get free money from obama. No one has to work, everything is FREE!
jamesbeach2 3 years ago 3
Empty headed Obama worshipers like this are certainly in for a rude awakening.
Once they figure out that the chosen one isn't going to pay off their car loans, fill their gas tank, or make their mortgage payment I'm sure they'll be coming to your and my house to collect what they believe they're entitled to.
guitarman28208 3 years ago 4
insane...
RestrainedNoMore 3 years ago 4
wooow! this is epic.
Palin 2012!
nowayxitsxLauren 3 years ago
No, Constitution Party. Don't vote Republican, they're every bit as socialist as the Democrats.
Alexandra22773 3 years ago
if it looks like socialism walks like socialism talks like socialism and is labeled Republican, it is socialism.
ParapaDrifter 3 years ago
Yep. Demicans and Republocrats--two peas in a socialist pod.
Notice the new RNC is pro-affirmative action, pro-abortion, and anti-gun, and that wench Sarah Brady says that guns are in the way of socialism.
Alexandra22773 3 years ago
where do they find these idiots?
Santa Obama gonna bring all kinds of funding huh?
Siriusluv 3 years ago 3
So, "peacekeeping forces" under the dumacrats are a better idea? Whatever. The USA needs to get out of the country building business. We have things here that are going to need our attention when Obama screws up.
MTNINFIDEL 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Well I'm not sure if your saying that to me but.Funding terrorists organizations and then silencing anybody on the streets that proves that,is much worse than peacekeeping forces.You are so brainwashed because i know you love having the ability to place blame and call names like "liberal,socialist" because calling names makes you feel better about yourself,its ok,call me a liberal.Because when republican start to lose arguments they wip that out quick!
lordvoldemort578 3 years ago
thanks for sharing *****
Bassfooler 3 years ago 2
5***** Priceless.
rockchickhoney 3 years ago 2
oh my goodness--I didn't know PE BO promised us that if he became President, he'd make us rich--if I'd known that, I would have more seriously contemplated voting for him! LOL ") Bobby Jindal 2012
GodEqualsLove4ever 3 years ago
Ok, Now I'm done. LOL. You seriously just don't get it. Keep drinking the cool-aid, but the ugly truth will confront you one day.
WELLFEDAMERICAN 3 years ago
median household income & change in
medium income:
Democrat:$49,163 6.000 increase in 8
years
medium household income & change in
medium income:republican:$48,023
$1.100 decrease in 6 years
lordvoldemort578 3 years ago
median household income & change in
medium income:
Democrat:$49,163 6.000 increase in 8
years
medium household income & change in
medium income:republican:$48,023
$1.100 decrease in 6 years
lordvoldemort578 3 years ago
lordvoldemort578 3 years ago
Dude...He's not even president yet
cp3w00 3 years ago
Tell that to WELLFEDAMERICAN who keeps saying "we aint rich yet" when he isn't in office,anything that happens now until january is all under Bush
lordvoldemort578 3 years ago
cp3w00 - Don't do it man, don't reply to lordhelmet. Just look at how badly I crushed him and he walked away thinking he was a winner. LOL
He'd be a wheelchair and argue that he could outrun you.
WELLFEDAMERICAN 3 years ago
lordvoldemort578 = IGNORANT
cp3w00 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
cp3w00=brainwashed by republicans.The United States government, under Ronald Reagan and George Bush Sr, trained and financed the Taliban and Osama bin Laden. Now, that the Taliban and al Qaeda turned against the United States, rightwing ideologues and republicans want to silence anybody who points it out.Because it means their half of the arguement in a matter of seconds.
lordvoldemort578 3 years ago
I'm a conservative and I know this.
Note I said "conservative" and not "neo-con."
I vote third party.
Alexandra22773 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
WELLFEDAMERICAN-cannot understand that everytime i answered his question he jumps to another topic,just to feel he won,but he left the arguement meaning i won by default
lordvoldemort578 3 years ago
republican:trade deficit:759billion 0.56 euros per dollar
democrat:trade deficit:380billion 1.07 euros per dollar
combat readiness
democrat:all active duty army dividions were rated at the highest readiness levels
republican;not a single active duty or reserve brigade in the u.s considered "fully combat ready"
foreign oil dependancy:52.75% of u.s liquid fue consumption is imported(democrat)
foreign oil dependancy:50.38% of u.s liquid fuel consumption imprted(retardican)
lordvoldemort578 3 years ago
Oh my goodness these poor people will soon be awakened to the TRUTHUS. Ya'll Been Had!
GeekGirl2u 3 years ago
Assuming they would have been renewed anyway, Obama's plan would bring in an additional $700 billion in taxes over the next 10 years, while McCain's would cost the Treasury $600 billion. Assuming legislators would have let the tax breaks expire, Obama's plan would cost the U.S. Treasury $2.7 trillion and McCain's $3.7 trillion
lordvoldemort578 3 years ago
If you think for a split second that McCain would have spent more than Obama, I'll just end it now cause it's not even worth discussing. Those numbers you throw around mean nothing, just like Obama's tax promises. Obama has no clue what he's going to spent, except it will be a lot. He just proposed the largest new investment in roads and bridges since President Dwight D. Eisenhower built the Interstate system in the late 1950s.
WELLFEDAMERICAN 3 years ago
Haha because you know you have nothing to defend,making you lose.
lordvoldemort578 3 years ago
Woah there Buddy,If the candidates don't know how much they will spend,Then why do you come with? "McCain would'nt spend more than obama"
Gotcha there pal! Because McCain spending more of tax payer dollars of over 12-13 billion a MONTH for a war,when we can just shift the responsibility to the 400,000 troops we have trained for the iraqis,The numbers i Throw around are obivously not random numbers they put on their budget list,its the estimated cost.
lordvoldemort578 3 years ago
EXCUSES, get them ready. McCain is over. Bush will leave soon. Get the excuses ready. Prepare to defend your messiah. You have not "dissed" (OOPS i am being racist again LOL) anyone but yourself by babbling on and on about Bush and McCain and how nothing will be your god Obamas fault. Warm up the million excuse bus. Here we go!
MTNINFIDEL 3 years ago
Look at the Redneck,(OOPS WHEN I SAY THIS I'M A RASCIST,BUT YOU ARE NOT?)Once proven wrong its that Same old "McCain is over" once he has nothing more to defend after being torn apart so many times in arguements with me Litterally look at every arguement he cannot deliver correctly.,Obama hasn't been sworn in and you idiots cannot keep your mouths shut,
Because you want to hold Obama accountable for EVERYTHING
But you rascist idiots never state Bush involvment in the crisis
dismissed
lordvoldemort578 3 years ago
Here is the reconstructed arguement:
Mtninfidel:when somebody calls me a fat redneck,they are rascist,but when i make fun of black people,i am not.
MTNINFIDEL:Warm up the million exscuse bus!
Lordvoldemort:just like you tried to do with Bush when he was accused of the crisis right?(owned)
Mtninfidel:No,Republicans get no blame,Because...well..We are republicans!
Lordvoldemort:,10 trillion deficit,war,62,000 dead civilans,4000troops unauthorized phone taps.ALL UNDER BUSH.owned
lordvoldemort578 3 years ago
You're kidding right?
What, we can't make fun of anyone who's a dumbass because their black anymore? I know that's what you, Jesse Jackson, and the white-guilt liberals probably want, but that's not freedom.
I reserve the right to make fun of anyone, including blacks.
Lastly, for the record, calling him a redneck would equate to him calling you a nigger, and I haven't seen that happen yet. So you better take a deeper look at your racists claim, as it appears you are the biggest one.
WELLFEDAMERICAN 3 years ago
Calling somebody a dumbass,because of they way they talk?,pretty damn rascist to me,If you cannot see that you are a moron.SIMPLE."calling him a redneck would equate to him calling you a nigger,"Not only do i appreciate your language in that sentence, In society the system of rascism,blacks have never been treated as fairly as whites have,so redneck should mean nothing to him.He walks into a store nobody says anything,I do,they hafe to act like they need to clean something where i am standing,.
lordvoldemort578 3 years ago
You can't be serious? If you were to laugh at some old country boy talking, I wouldn't cry racist. You are just overly sensitive, thanks to a media that has taught you to be the victim.
Also, if a white person was to call another one a redneck, and it's ok. Please explain to me how that's any different than a black man calling another black man a nigger?
Last time I checked, you all were calling each other that about 10000% more than we were.
WELLFEDAMERICAN 3 years ago
If you think black people love the media you hafe to be kidding me....the way they have portrayed us during the hurricanes,If you keep acting like no history is relevant,and white people have the short end of the stick,i cannot explain to you,but.I have never endorsed using the n word with my homies,i would just say homies.Simple.
lordvoldemort578 3 years ago
I never said whites had the short end of the stick, do you make things up as you go? I simply don't subscribe to the "poor black man" theory. Blacks are every bit as capable of being successful in this country as whites.
Is there a history of suppressing the blacks? yep, but the same can be said about the Irish, the Chinese, and countless other races, so why is it we only hear you complaining? get over it already and prove to the racists that what they think is false.
WELLFEDAMERICAN 3 years ago
Have the chinese,irish,and countless other races been oppressed and turned down jobs for their skin color? Have the Chinese Irish,And coutnless other races get millions of guns,hundreds of liquor stores,in their community?no.If i were to put what you said in a third graders term,you pretty much said you have the short end of the stick "They had more than i did"
lordvoldemort578 3 years ago
Do you have any clue to American history? The Irish and Chinese got treated like second class citizens because of their RACE. PLEASE PLEASE educate yourself because you are looking like a tool.
As for the liquor and guns stores? Who's fault is that? If no one bought them, the store would fail. How come it's normally orientals that run them? People who come to this country with nothing can make it, why can't blacks? Oh that's right, because you are victims and deserve it for free. I got it now.
WELLFEDAMERICAN 3 years ago
If you are living in a community where it's virtually nothing to do when you come home,have no money,what are you most likely to do if it's there?The day care system is a gang system.I have worked with youth of color convicing them to put away the guns and get some food,It works for some,others it doesn't,crime should not be defined by one race,so why is it that you say black people need to wake up and solve their problems,when every race goes through the same thing.
lordvoldemort578 3 years ago
Very simple, to most of us anyway, but I'll go over it with you again.
Republicans = Lower taxes, smaller government
Democrats = Higher taxes, larger government.
Sorry bub, but that's the way it's always been.
As for the war, Democrat and Republican, it would have happened. Again, this requires an open mind to understand. When the war was started, 80+% of Americans backed it. Combine that with the fact that most power players, including democrats have gone on record..
WELLFEDAMERICAN 3 years ago
Very simple,
Republicans:tax everyone,evan people who cannot keep their homes.How else do rich people stay rich.Under these conditions
Democrats:tax the rich so that the poor have an oppuruinty to pay for health care and other things without worrying about taxes,
Ofcourse everybody is going to back it up to ensure that we won't lose more family during 9/11,but when bush took our tax dollars,helped kill 4,000,troops,65000,wounded,got us into a big finanical crisis it became unpopular.
lordvoldemort578 3 years ago
Ok man, I'm done with you, say whatever you want since you obviously have a very not only flawed logic, but information as well. EVERYTHING you say is straight from an Obama speech, and it's damn near all BS.
Do yourself a favor and do a google search for -
income taxes under clinton and bush
And realize the truth. Funny how even someone making as low as 30k pays LESS tax now then they did 8 years ago under Clinton. And Clinton was a moderate democrat and not a liberal. I'm done man.
WELLFEDAMERICAN 3 years ago
Under clinton:
SURPLLUS OF MONEY AND JOBS
lordvoldemort578 3 years ago
Because he gutted the shit out of the government - Military, CIA, FBI, etc. Guess what happened next? yep, you got it 9/11.
Not only did Clinton let Bin Laden go when we had them captured, he may be largely responsible for 9/11.
I bet the left wing website you got that from didn't happen to tell you that did it?
WELLFEDAMERICAN 3 years ago
The left wing website i got it from was from reading about my party,something republicans fear.
Notice you never mention that Bush never captured bin laden either....lol
lordvoldemort578 3 years ago
(cont) as saying Saddam was a threat and needed to be taken care of. Funny thing is though, when the war got unpopular, seems MOST democrats backstepped and that started criticizing bush. Only a few democrats such as Liberman and Zell Miller stood like men and continued to support it even though their party had shun them.
WELLFEDAMERICAN 3 years ago
Look, I admire you passion, but I suggest you read up for a while because the only thing I'm hearing is Obama talking points, like found on his web or through some liberallt biased source.
I could sit here and do the same. I could go to McCains site and do the same, but any real pundits would laugh me off the page. There's a huge difference in what politicians say and do, and one only needs to look at their voting record and beliefs of the party. Both off which I'm criticizing Obama for.
WELLFEDAMERICAN 3 years ago
The 95 percent-plus of the American population that earns less than $250,000 would see the following tax breaks: A $500-per-worker tax credit for people who earn less than $150,000 and do not itemize, and a $4,000 credit per child in college. Seniors who earn less than $50,000 would pay no income tax.
lordvoldemort578 3 years ago
Too bad 40% of the population dont even pay taxes. Hmm, that means that the rich alone are not going absorb it all, guess who will? Yep, you got it, the middle class. Obama's numbers don't work, period.
Fact is, and this can be verified, that people pay LESS tax now under Bush, then they did under Clinton. And that's people making as little as 30k. That is the inconvenient truth about Democrats, sorry to burst the hype bubble.
WELLFEDAMERICAN 3 years ago
The rich would pay more under Barack Obama's tax plan, and the poor and middle-class would pay less, a nonpartisan analysis finds. Under John McCain's plan, the rich would pay much less than they do now, the poor and middle-class would pay a bit less, and the federal deficit would grow, the study found.
Each individual's tax situation is different, so it's hard to say for sure how much more or less you would pay under the presidential candidates' ever-evolving tax proposals
lordvoldemort578 3 years ago
• Obama was the only national leader or institution with a net positive rating on handling the Wall Street crisis in a USA TODAY/Gallup Poll taken Friday and Saturday — 46% approved, 43% disapproved. For McCain, the numbers were 37% approve, 58% disapprove. Democratic and GOP congressional leaders, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and President Bush also did poorly
lordvoldemort578 3 years ago
In response to lordvold below -
You do realize that Obama is leaving Bush's tax rates in place right, and they won't expire til at least 2010. Funny how this is EXACTLY what McCain said he would do. Makes you think who was right all along.
Only someone with no understanding of economics would support Obama's tax plan. It's a joke, and would further cripple our economy. It seems someone got through to him and told him it wasn't a good idea.
WELLFEDAMERICAN 3 years ago
Well really since you can only post a 500 word discription,i will gladly argue with you through messages,and destroy you.WELLFEDAMERICAN,still has no answers to:
McCain continueing to spend 13billion dollars a month in iraq when we are in deficit,and they have a surplus.Will that not further rip us apart? It's like i said People are getting taxed no matter what.Obama wants to tax rich people more and poor people less.McCain disagrees.
lordvoldemort578 3 years ago
Found a copy and reposted below.
WELLFEDAMERICAN 3 years ago
lordvoldemort578 "I'm Sick of this crap people keep saying "Oh that Obama thinks he can pay peoples car payments",No despite what you have heard from your idiotic rascist friends,Barack Obama would like to lower taxes for working people,and create jobs so that we can get to middle class back on track,He never said "I will pay peoples car payments" If we are in a billion dollars deficit,why would john McCain keep spening 12 billion dollars in iraq with their 80billion dollar surplus?"
WELLFEDAMERICAN 3 years ago
I want to publicly say that I accidentally went to "reply" to one of lordvoldemort578's comments and hit the "remove" by accident. This wasn't intentional as I fully believe in the right of free speech. My apologies
lordvoldemort578.
WELLFEDAMERICAN 3 years ago
"The most important thing is for us to find Osama bin Laden. It is our number one priority and we will not rest until we find him." —Washington, D.C., Sept. 13, 2001
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority." — George W. Bush March 13, 2002
If this were a dictatorship, itd be a heck of a lot easier just as long as Im the dictator." George W. Bush
FASCISM!!
lordvoldemort578 3 years ago
You want to hold Obama for everthing that happens to this country? When you rascist crapholes didn't think it was necessary to do that to Bush?
Pathetic.
lordvoldemort578 3 years ago
As soon as he steps in office, yep, he is then accountable. Or does that only matter when it's a republican in office?
And please, Give the race card a break Jesse. If Obama was 100% white, he'd get the same treatment. Fact is, he's a left leaning liberal with suspicious ties, a shady background, and no experience.
WELLFEDAMERICAN 3 years ago
I hate when people say "Don't use the race card".Then you pull it out on republicans like they have had the short end of the stick? Name one republican who was left with billions of dollars deficit to take care of.'As soon as he steps in office, yep, he is then accountable. Or does that only matter when it's a republican in office?"Feeble attempt at turning around my question,That you rascist idiots want to hold Him responsible? But Bush didn't deserve any part in the crisis?
lordvoldemort578 3 years ago
Yeah well, just tell me why Wall Street needs a bailout as expensive as world war 2 and no one can spare the 1000.00 for the car, that would stimulate the economy, she could buy some groceries instead of the man, a banker, some ahole charging 30%. So da the other side of the issue. Obama represents hope to her, fair enough, better that than whitey the smarmy whiner always dissing everything.
So what about that, then.
kevo999 3 years ago
Any why should anyone spare the $1000 for the car? She signed the contract to pay, couldn't pay, car goes bye bye end of story. This isn't a black white thing, this isn't a rich poor thing, this isn't even a thing about the continual decline of our federal government. This is an individual who was irresponsible, and will have to accept the consequences thereof.
dustinmwyatt03 3 years ago 3
Bwahahahahaha......ROTFLMAO! Yes, and her house payment will be taken care of along with a never ending tank of gas...Bwahahahaha! What a libtard.
daw2317 3 years ago 2
He will give us ALL rhodium rings! As thanks for our support.
Ishpeck 3 years ago
Obama will fix it!!!!!
stinkipete 3 years ago
fuck this ghetto trash bitch. maybe if she didn't sit her ass at home and collect food stamps and get free hand outs and she actually got her ghetto ass up and got herself a job then maybe she could pay the car loan and not have to worry about shit obama giving her money
BobTheBuilder429 3 years ago
You got that right, just give him a little Elmer's glue and look at him go!
SestrenNK 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I have four letters in response to this... R O F L
TruenoBlues 3 years ago 2
And what happens when they don't get rich?
lizbethkirk 3 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
(corrected)
They turn against Obama and start calling him an Uncle Tom. Much like they do all intelligent, free thinking, Black leaders who don't subscribe to their thinking.
WELLFEDAMERICAN 3 years ago
What happened to self responsibility and work ethics in this country? Clearly, some people never had it and they never will.
FORTRUTHONLY 3 years ago 4
What can my country do for me? Should be the new slogan of their party.More entitlements, health insurance,new homes,free food,free energy.What's next?Who's going to want to work then?
brokensoul71 3 years ago 2
LOL...I better start planning my financial portfolio..after the windfall I receive from the "savior" Blowbama..I'll need to have help in securing my millions....snicker..snicker..
crazyforcrowe 3 years ago
Sad Sad,you probably couldn't holdon well in the last 4 years,and you wanted to vote for it again. pathetic.
lordvoldemort578 3 years ago
Your messiah not looking so good now? What happened to taxing the rich? The tax cuts are going to be allowed to expire. Get ready for more broken promises. It will be intresting to see what you fools posts after he is in office for a few months. Its too bad our first black President has to be this fool instead of a worthy American citizen. Your BOYEE gonna be gone in 4. I am going to hold Obama responsible for EVERYTHING that happens to this country while he is in office. Get those excuses ready
MTNINFIDEL 3 years ago 4
Another stereotype from a man who will not claim he isn't a rascist:"Your BOYEE gonna be gone in 4"Pathic you cannot admit..Secondly,The man you would have elected would have kept things the way they we're,how else would he be able to let rich people keep their wealth without taxing a lower class?And for this "taxing rich people" crap,There is no united states of america unless you tax people,its a question of who you want to tax,poor people? or rich people?thirdly,(CONTINUED)
lordvoldemort578 3 years ago
Why is BOYEEE racist when I say it but not when you say it? Pathetic liberal double standard. Get those Obama excuses ready, here come da busted promise train. "Yes we can! yes we can! yes we can!" ROFLMFAO
MTNINFIDEL 3 years ago 4
I hate when you people try to inflict the same emotion you got when i dissed you so bad on the last message,back to me.Pathetic attempt,"here come da busted promise train"
Mtninfidel proving his rascism by judgeing peoples way of talking evan if they have no control over it,You arent just speaking to me,Your saying that to all black people who had to live in harsh conditions,You are to stuborn,no matter how much i tell how McCAIN WILL BE THE WORSE PRESIDENT,You continue with hate.
lordvoldemort578 3 years ago
Cho cho, I hear it too.
Seriously, you just make yourself look like an ass. Obama's record speaks for itself, the only thing you have are his promises and he's already broken the biggest one - Taxes.
Just so you know, I grew up poor myself in a city with many blacks. The route I took in life could have been achieved by anyone, regardless of color. So cry me a river about the poor blacks. With all the special grants, funds, and affirmative action available, they had more opportunity than I did.
WELLFEDAMERICAN 3 years ago
"Yes we can" turns into "Well maybe not"
"Hope" turns into "managed expectations"
"Change" turns into "Change, in 2010"
I thought Obama was supposed to make our car payments for us. I am going to hold him to ALL his promises. Get your excuses ready liberals. I am LMFAO at ALL you liberal dumbasses who voted for this fool. Great job numb nuts. This will guarantee a Republican victory in 2012.
MTNINFIDEL 3 years ago 3
Keep in mind Bush left him the biggest financial crisis in federal history,Keep your crap to yourself.
lordvoldemort578 3 years ago
The biggest joke of this is one of Obama's aides has recently released a statement saying they will probably let Bush's tax cuts run their course til 2010.
WELLFEDAMERICAN 3 years ago
"...we will be, because we have barrack obama"! LMAO... I'll have to ask my colored friends how rich they are at the end of 2009.
KarmaU28 3 years ago 4
We can't be the only ones who find this laughingly stupid. The audio was leaked for a reason. =)
SestrenNK 3 years ago
BTW, "this year"? As in what's left of it? Was there a Barack Obama "I'll make you rich in a Month" scheme I missed out on? Not even president yet and he can make people rich... Man...
SestrenNK 3 years ago
OMG!!!What state is this in? I mean here in NY ,We the peolpe have already renamed a school after Obama. We have no money for BOOKS. but hell we have money for a new sign?
hooah213 3 years ago 4
Don't forget the stamps, coins and plates. I suppose they will have Obama head Christmas balls too, only Hussein doesn't celebrate Christmas. Maybe he celebrates Kwanza, but that's not even a real African holiday. They made it up to get another holiday off.
GiovannaNYC 3 years ago
Hey Gio,Next they will rename Hempstead Jonestown.I hate these Kool-Aid drinkers.
oh ya, Texas! ha.
hooah213 3 years ago
Ths stupidity of it all!! Typical Messiah supporter:(
chattingcat 3 years ago