People dont realize HOW LUSH North America was! It would make the Serengeti look like a petting zoo! Bison twice the size of modern ones,Sloths weighing 5 tons! Mamoths,Mastadons,Giant short faced bears!,American lions 25% larger than modern lions!
Saber toothed cats! glyptodonts the size of a mid sized car! not to mention all the other mid to small fauna that lived with these beasts.
All were wiped out in the flood, not disease, CERTAINLY not man,no commet strike, but a FLOOD!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Evolutionists and their effeminate followers are so dishonest that it is laughable. The militant homosexual community does everything that it can do fight against God and the Bible. We see examples of this right here on this channel and all through youtube.
@thechessstick If u really think the world is 6000 yrs old, u will look into this one, of which most yecs arrogantly ignor. With this one, no yec has had the last word (and I have won nearly ten times in a row, so far). If they really think the world is young (and if it was) they would challenge me, but they can't and it will be the same with you, my friend. I am talking about the impact craters on earth. Evidence we all can see with their eyes, that the world is dfinitely old!
@Justwantahover LOL. And how do you date impact craters? What a joke. They could well have occurred after Noah's Flood. What's the big deal? Why there are even guyots (flat tops, submerged islands) that are a mile under the Pacific Ocean. This is easily explained and in excellent accord with the Genesis account. Please.... Next softball pitch.
@thechessstick Cool! u said the Bible described an impact (sound like one). But I think it's just a fictitious "effect" like in star-wars or the lord of the rings. The Bible is poetry collected and put together by do-gooder spin-doctors. Poetry with deep meaning (sometimes). Do u take "The Ancient Marina" literaly or do u just get some sort of artistic sensation from it? I asked one of my friends "How can u understand that astrology crap"? He said, "u just feel it".
@Justwantahover You need to do a search for Ron Wyatt right here on youtube. He found Noah's Ark, the real Mount Sinai, the Red Sea Crossing site, the Ark of the Covenant and several other proofs of the Book of Genesis. Keep seeking. But don't let evolution and that "billions or years" crap retard your learning process. I call that "evolutardation".
@thechessstick U can't argue with cubic capacity of the craters and the volume of soil excavated. And u can"t argue with the energy to move that volume of soil immediately. How many nuclear bombs would be required to excavate thousands of cubic kms? Do u know how much soil is in just one cubic kilometer? Can u imagine one big cube a km wide, a km long and a km high. Can u picture how much soil that is? No u can't because your a yec!
@thechessstick Can't u just say that the impacts happened before he created the vegetation and land animals (I have my creation glasses on). This solves a lot of problems and one yec said that a lot of things (like pink flying saucers) could happen that's not mentioned in the bible. But craters have varied stages of erosion and date differently. They are dated easily because melt rock restars clock. About dating! It's too small to see so it's no good to show the masses.
@thechessstick I won't talk about dating (with my evolution glasses on) and I won't talk about something I can't understand (and we can't see). I will talk about dating (with my creation glasses on). The RATE team scower the rock s to find evidence (that we can't see) of a young earth and for most (like dating) is not evidence (unless they go to uni for 10 yrs). The RATE team have and ,by day, they date rocks for (mainstream) science. It's their job. They take data that they deny!
@thechessstick The rate team go along with the data for their job but do't believe it! But they say that the dating system is not 100% but it's not inaccurate enough for the vast dif in age of earth. So they say there MUST was a period acceleration in the past. Now just the weakness of this argument debunks a young earth (straight-away). The great thing (for me) about the RATE team is that they are rock scientists and yecs and they prove that the dating system is sound!
@thechessstick Just give u a bit of time to "put your evolution glasses on" and Google impacts on earth and "put your creation glasses on" and see what the yec sites say. Most say flood but some just deny (but they are proven). Discuss the craters in a creationism sminar etc. And tell them flood is not acceptable (for obvious reasons) and (same story) for after the flood! (There's record of Pompai but no record of one single strike 1000s x larger than Pompai) The world is old!
@thechessstick Would u acept creation day meteors strikes theory? (I'm only curious). Does it conflict with the Bible too huch?.If u accept it, tell your friends the creation scientists are flawed (with flood and deny theory) because we obviously would't be here. If you dont accept creation strike theory, u can't accept a young earth can u! Study impacts and study yec sites (glasses on). Help yecs get act together(if u want to argue) and it helps us too! ( I told u I would win)!
@thechessstick There are many impacts over30km diam craters. They proven by iridium and other rare substances around the rim, as well as tektites (glass marble formations). There are adozon or so of craters over 50 km diam, a few over 100 km, four that are nearly (and over) 200 km diam! Now try to argue with this. Volume = pye r squared x (average) depth. Initial excavation depths about 1/4 diam. But for a 200 km cr will will say average depth is 5 km (but could be a lot more).
@Justwantahover First of all it is not proven that they are impact craters. 2ndly if you want to be scientific at all then you have to do controlled experiments before you start stating things as fact. So, you need to take an earth-like planet and smash an asteroid into it and see how its life fares. Until you can do an experiment like this you are only speculating. Watch a few a Ron Wyatt videos.
@thechessstick (2) This makes it 3.14 x 100 x 100 x 5 = 157,000 CUBIC kms!! How much explosive power would be required to excavate that much soil and rock (instantly)? There is a crater that is 250 km diam and one that is 300 km diam (plus all the 160 others over 1k with many over 10 km, 20 km, 30 km! Billions of years is the only way to explain it! and u cant argue with simple cubic capacity. And u can't argue with simple energy required to shift all thi soil instantly. But u ...
@thechessstick (3) Billions of years allows for the strike to happen once in millions of years and the earth regenerates between strikes (and r-dating is different for craters). But u put them in the flood, or u deny that they are impacts (while most are proven by iridium and tektites). Putting them in the flood only makes the problem worse because u have them all striking within a year. How come the ark (and all those sea creatures) survived. Can u account for the craters ...
@thechessstick (4) Can u account for the the craters without rewriting the Bible, my friend? The good news version sounds like very good news (when it comes to the flood) and is nothing like the yecs recon it was. U say that our science is not science then u say that Aaron's (stick turning into a snake) is science! What physical laws does this foliow? (Harry Potter laws of physics). What laws of physics does an asteroid strike (the size of mount everest) going 40,000 mph follow!
@Justwantahover Craters are easily accounted for. Do you know that the Bible even says that a fire mountain is one day going to crash into the sea killing the seas life? LOL.
@thechessstick Are u really saying they may have struck after the flood. U know how much damage was done at Hiroshima and how much publicity (we all know of it). And it was the same when this sort of destruction happenes thousands of years ago; the same publicity (and everyone knows about it (even now). Pompai! An atom bomb leaves a hole about 200-300 meters diam. Volume of this crater is only a small fraction of one cubic km. This is so much less than 157,000 cubic kms!
@thechessstick Need I say anymore? Oh! That's right; yr a yec...yes I do have to say more. The difference in power required (to excavate a given volume of soil) has to be similar to the difference in soil volume. So it's obvious that if even one (that size) struck (in the last 4000 yrs) we would't be here (simple). I could argue about why the water above mt Ev didn't collaps crust, but that's fantasy. I'm sticking to what is real...the craters. Tell your friends about them!
@thechessstick Oh! U said "What's the big deal" (about the craters). Well, u see it's realy significant! We wouldn't be here if all those went off in the last several thousand yrs. We wouldn't be here if just one of the big ones struck in the last million yrs, so how could we be here if the world is 600 yrs (but u choose to ignor this). As if we would still be here! Please explain to me how we are here in a young earth while the craters are here too. No yec has and they can't.
@thechessstick To say "what's the big deal" (about the craters) and just walk away and later go and preach a young earth to (poor sods who wouldn't know) in my mind is a crime and is he just another yec liar. Listen and take notice of the truth before u go on lying. I'm sorry my friend, don't be sad (I'm certainly not) the world is old.
@thechessstick I told u that u would just ignor the craters (does this mean that u are ignorant)? If the world is 6000 yrs old, u should be able to easily explain why the craters are here, and we are here too! But u can't (casting doubt on a young earth). U choose to ignor the craters (that are actually real) and go on with (here-say bits of wood (that could come from anything) about a fantasy. I win, if that's the case. And I knew I would win this one, right from the start! HA HA
@thechessstick (1)"I need to see the data". Share this with your yec friends (who can understand math for 12 yr olds). Data: crater 200km, excavated volume = 150,000 cubic kilometers! Derived from pye r squared x (average) depth. Most craters max depth = 1/4 diam. Average depth is 1/4 of that. This is about !0 km( but we half this to go your way and to be conservative). So it is 5 km! (average depth) so this comes to (over) 150,000 cubic kms. of soil that is initially excavated.
@thechessstick (2) Data; an atom bomb will make a crater about 300 meters diam which is a volume about 5,000,000 cubic meters. One cubic km is one-billion cubic meters. So the A bomb moves only a small fraction of one cubic km. And u would have to agree that (to move MORE soil, it requires MORE explosive power). So u would have to agree that to move just one cubic km of soil (like a 3km crater) u will need 1000s of A bombs. And (a 3km) crater impact is just a little one!
@thechessstick (1) So u are arguing with the fact that there are tektites around the rims of the craters (glass marble formations). These are never seen at volcanoe craters and the scientists say that (heat of much higher temperature) is needed to form tecktites (that were molten) during impact. Iridium is a common substance in a fair few meterites found but is a rare substance on earth. The irridium is concentrated around the rim but is in traces all over crater. u are a good ...
@thechessstick U are a good person 2 argue with. It's competitive sport, not war! Mythbusters did an exp to bust a hollywood myth (is an underwater swimmer safe from gun shot)? Answer : Yes, as long as it is a high powered rifle! The high powered bullets dis-integrated! Also a crater geologist fired bullets into sand and the bullets alo disintegrated. So the scientists know the meteors disintegrate because of the exp and because of the scattered rare substaces (like iridium).
@thechessstick U are also aruing with amount of explosive power and I already showed u. Scientists have done exp (and u say where is the exp and don't give me that rubbish about ovserving one and we couldn't but even if Im inacurate by a thousond-fold I would still win). But pure simple math says I'm accurate witthin 50% each way. It's simple volume of crater. If an A-bomb makes a 300 meter diam crater, how many A- bombs make a 3 km crater? Answer (within 50% each way) : 1000
@thechessstick 1000 A bombs to make a 3km crater. How did I come to that figure? The volume of the 3km crater is 1000 times more volume of soil than the 300 meter crater. That is because the 3km crater is 10 times the diameter (it's just lenght x breadth x depth). 10 x lenght, 10 x breadth and 10 x depth = 1000 times volume. So if there is 1000 x volume of soil, it is resonable to say (50% each way) that the A-bombs required would be 1000 (500-1500) A-bombs to make a 3km crater.
@Justwantahover I told u the data before (three times) but u won't study it and then tell me to give u the data. All you need is cubic capacity which can be easliy assessed, for proof beyond any doubt whatsoever (which is better than reasonable doubt). I don't know if you really are that dumb or you are just playing dumb (but it's obvious). Give me an answer (if u can) so u can win (but I know u can't because the world is old). A 30 km crater is only a little one! OOH! OOH! OOH!
@thechessstick Experiment Scientist have done experiments with nucllea bombs to see what size crater they make and they measur diam and calculate volume etc. So they can assess power of impacts by collecting size data from the impacts. Material moved wieght can be (fairly accurately) assessed by known weight of soil. It's then just physics for a given mass to be excavated (simple). Even if it was 200% inacurate (but I recon less than 30%) I still have absolute proof (HA HA).
@thechessstick I have been reading your coments (feel guilty already do you). Jesus said to love thy neighbour and to not judge others! (What are you doing?). I'm a sap and have my beliefs too (but it's not science). God: "That was a great honour to get recognition for such an ahivement and it means so much to me". " This organism is undergoing vocal communication and the peptides that are associated with reward are flowing down arteries in his neck and veins and into his cells."
@thechessstick In last comment, I said "This organism is" etc I mean't to say Science: "This organism is undergoing vocal communication etc". I forgot to put Science: in front of it (so you get the joke).
Here is another video demonstrating that Piltdown is off limits to creos. Not until creos adopt codes of ethics and conduct. If creationism is allegedly so virtuous, why do creos so often resort to fabrications and deceptions? Crying that there is somekind of "conspiracy" intended to prevent creos fabrication from the light of day is merely a diversion to hide the fruadulant conduct of creos. People need learn standards. Simply claiming conduct in the name of God, does not make it honest.
@lawilson200 A whip for the horse, a bridle for the ass, and a rod for the fool's back. Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him. Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own conceit. Proverbs 26:3-5
@warneveryonedotcom So you are playing the role of a hypocrite, in addition to the role of a perjurer and an idolator. Christ often warned us to beware of people who are false. Thank you for deomonstrating that you are one of them.
However, in any world, your retort is meaningless. What does your ill use of scripture have to do with creo's who are incapable of developing any standards at all? Would you buy a used car from a dealer with a rep of selling lemons because he is a Christian?
@lawilson200 I would buy a used car from a christian before I would an evolutionist.Evolutionists are just like used car salesmen,selling broken down theories.You mentioned conspiracy?Well it was the very same teachers who said to us we bought America from the Indians,Well the fact is that it was stolen from them.So why wouldn't they lie about evolution they have lied about history already.Once they lie you can not believe anything they teach anymore,this goes for anybody atheist or not.
"I would buy a used car from a christian " Not surprising. I still vividly remember when Tim Bakker was exposed misspending donation money to his PTL theme park and residency, including a $45,000 air conditioned dog house, he was still able to raise hundreds of thousands of dollars from people willing to overlook his excesses
The rest, is nust complete nonsense. I have noticed though, you did not answer my question.
@lawilson200 Please explain these alleged fabrications. So far, the only thing you have managed to accomplish is to hurl ad hom attacks and insults, not once yourself offering anything to counter act or rebutal the evidence...typical. And you are still using Piltdown man? A known fraud? That is a pretty sad deployment on your part. Evoes.....very funny stuff. Straining at a gnat while swallowing a camel.
@3gdosrsfs Seriously. Have you even tried to read the reference article? It is poorly written with many grammer and a few spelling errrors. The writter basis a lot of his assertions on conjectures and provides no actual evidence to support his claim.
All too often theis is typical. Since this came from Texas is not surprising, considering the equally discredited Paluxy Footprints.
Snelling admitted Creos need to adopt some standards. Perhaps you should listen to him.
Lol not one comment about the article just arguments that have nothing to do with the video.So are there or are there not Giant skulls and bones found?If you go to Turkey you can see them for youreself,as they won't put them in American museums for sure.I have seen them myself,with my own eyes,some fairy tales can be true.
@Craigmw45 You can go see them in Turkey as they don't suppress the truth there.Also south America has many of these fossils too.When you people don't like the evidence you throw it out,that is not science.It is called lying.And I wouldn't expect you people to put anything in a museum that contradicts youre belief so it's no big suprise to me.And the fossils in Turkey looked quite real to me,actualy mutch larger than I expected them to be.Go see them for youreself as all are welcome to.
@korzon How about a study of these giant fossils. Verified pictures? Anything?
You must realize that I'm not going to go to turkey to find these. Or accept that they just are there, when so many of the other claims of other giants have been disproven over the years.
Though why, specifically, do you think these would be a problem for evolution? I can't see why they would at all. I just doubt their existence, because I have not seen any evidence for my self.
@korzon OF course they don't want to read or comment on the article. They'd look even more idiotic trying to argue against facts. Evolutionists are masters at using speculation and conjecture to try to make their arguments sound intellegent, which is in itself kind of funny because they dont believe in intellegence...except their own...which they cant for the life of themselves explain how it came to be, except for some convoluted nonsense about chemicals...which is only the catylist BTW
@3gdosrsfs Yes they look at the effects but never the cause.Then they fabricate a cause for their effect they have observed.Real science is watching a cause make an effect,then we can call something a fact.But they woould rather call it theory so when they are proved to be wrong they say well thats how scince works we just guess at it till we get it right.That is not science and we should not teach people things in school till we know the facts,otherwise we create a generation of ignorance.
@korzon Horrific misunderstanding of theory and fact, in science they're different things and not rungs on a ladder of increasing certainty. Theories model and explain the behaviors of facts and phenomena
I have come to the conclusion that atheist have chosen to go to hell. The bible tells us that God him self will have to enlarge the walls of hell to hold all those that have chose to go there, What a shame this is when the real truth is staring them right in the face. I will continue to pray for all the atheist that they see the truth before its to late, God have mercy on all of us, And God bless us all.
All those movies and TV shows that have the government hiding away all these antiquities that they deem as "dangerous", are so true. As a last ditch effort to suppress the truth. They spout: "conspiracy conspiracy; when you should blindly trust your leaders".
@fellowservant34 Yep people need to know how radical and suppressive the smithsonian is..they are pathetic and have lost all proffessional credibility.
The evolutionary conspiracy has and will continue to have the most catastrophic strangleholds upon human conscience in recorded history, so what is needed to bring light out of shadow is a more virulent form of attack, with a wholly methodical and pernicious take no prisoners mentality to fuel the offensive, with nothing resembling in any way shape or form the tepid responces of late which never brings the offenders to accountability or penality.
@seekerofgod7777777 So true! They need tob charged..they have helped in this deciet for too long and kept the truth hidden from the people...as a result many thousands are burning in hell now..how can mankind punish such a tragic crime? it is sad.
@doobersmanster Brother You/We Get It!!! :) I wish ALL The Creationists who support this channel would turn up the heat on all these evo-trolls to hellish levels and drop the luke warm folly of tolerance which only encourages those who're cold to become frozen.
You've done some fine work here, so keep it up and we'll ALL finish the race as a "Workman Approved"
@seekerofgod7777777 They don't 'turn up the heat' because most creationists realize they're incapable of being a creationist and having an intelligent discussion on matters such as biology etc.
@TheScienceFoundation When I was in university the top GPS students including myself consisted of all creationists. At the bottom were atheists with very few exceptions. I'm willing to bet it's the same in most if not all universities regardless of subject area. I work in the scientific field. Guess who the most logical people I work with are? I'm telling you this first hand sir. It's not open for debate.
@Meathead36 What school? What year? What field do you work in and what evidence is it you think supports creation or contradicts evolution? I wouldn't doubt that you made every bit of that up on the spot. You're right about one thing, it's not up for debate that creationists are the least intelligent demographic even among theists in general.
@TheScienceFoundation I could post all of what you requested but honestly, what would be the point? You still wouldn't believe it. You are locked into one point of view. You completely ignore all evidence right in front of your nose if it doesn't suite your distorted logic. That's the point of this video and you have proven it well. I would ask you to look into the top students in you local university but you won't. Why? Because it would force you to reconsider your paradigm logically.
@Meathead36 What evidence? That's the point of me and others continually correcting these videos, repeating the same garbage ad nauseum is not a valid argument.
@Meathead36 I had some faith (20 yrs ago). Then I read the Bible and that was a turning point. I couln't swallow 900 yr old people etc (just like "The Lord of The Rings" and Harry Potter). So my faith went out the widow (so to speak). I go by science and feasibility (not Harry Pottery). But I'm still a sort-of theist (but an agnost ic one). I'm still a sap (maybe it's the God gene in me).
@Justwantahover it's exactly what they want. Do you really want the truth? All you have to do is ask. Just say this. Jesus, are you real? did you die for me? I want the truth. If you really do want the truth he will show you...if you don't, he won't. You have to decide whether you want the truth or more of their fairy tales that lead you down roads that will be never ending.
@Justwantahover There may be some hope for you after all friend. You can also find a great deal of evidence for the existance of God outside the Bible. One example is the elites of the this world. I'm an expert on the occult. Believe me when I tell you, they worship Lucifer. They are also the ones that have written the history books and formed the organized religions of this world. I assure you, they despise Jesus Christ alone. There can only be one reason for their behaviour.You can guess why.
@Justwantahover I would agree with you on truth and reality. oddly 900year old people is not a bit to doubt though. It does seem extraordinary but geneticists are talking about extending human life over 300 years because there is no technical reason why we can't live much longer. The reason we age is mostly a) running out of regeneration cycles (look up "telomeres" and b)genetic mutations. telomere length decreases with generations and mutations increase, giving a downward force on lifetimes.
Healthier nutrition and medical intervention have created an upward lifetime pressure but genetic based problems like leukaemia are still on the increase.
If you started with "perfect" genetic instructions the early drop off rate due to mutations would be fast (particularly after a population bottleneck).
If you plot the ages of people after the flood they fit extremely well with a standard error accumulation/functionality graph.
If the Bible was made up why would it claim such absurd sounding ages which don't make sense until we have a good understanding of genetics and biological systems. It is one of the bits that make me clearer that it is truthful. If you were making up a story you would have things that made sense with your current understanding of reality but would be proved wrong by future research, or did the writers understand genetics and heredity?
@Mayburyj Have u read the mainstream version (of which in some cases they find it difficult). The yecs scower through all the scientific evidence to look for "weak spots" (so to spesk) and occasionally u can get a yec story (that u just mack-up,mostly without any evidence or back-up what-so-ever. (eg. U put the impact craters in the flood and just state that all the impacts happened in one year, during the flood (of which is debunked by the impacts). This is science.
@Mayburyj Read my crater thesis on this video, or see my video called"5 EASY WAYS TO DEBUNK A YOUNG EARTH". The 170 km diam impact crater excavated about 100,000 quubic kms of soil and rock (instantly). How much explosive power would be required to do this? Most are proven impacts by iridium and other substances around the rim, and tektites (glass marble formations). But this is only one impact! Billions of years is the only way to explain why us (and the sea creatures) are still here.
@Mayburyj But u put them in the flood. This only makes the crater problem worse (and it debunks (good news bible) version of flood! The big problem is, if u put all the impact in the flood (how could anything survive? (except a few microbes). There is a 300 km diam crater and a 250 km one, and a few around 90-100 km and over a dozen over 50 km diam. There is one that is 24 km diam and is 5km deep. Now stand on the rim and look into the crater an say the world is 6000 yrs old.
@Mayburyj And that's only a little one (but it's unusually deep). The initial excavatin is about a quarter of diam (and is quickly partialy refilled). Simple volume sum varifies cubic capacity initially excavated. So you cant argue with the force required to do this instantly! U cant deny them (and some yecs do) and if u put all the in the flood all striking within a year, u have a problem. And no yec has explained it (I win). The world is definitely old (because we are here)!
@Mayburyj I suggest u (my friend) Google impacts from mainstream and yec sites (with your evolution and creation glasses on). With the craters I can debunk a young earth (with my evolution glasses on) and debunk the flood (with my creation glasses on)! The craters are (obviously)something u can see!!! Un like the salt theory or your silly r-decay accelerate theory (which is my main [creation glasses on] argument)! I suggest u yecs discuss the craters and at try to protect your young e.
@Mayburyj No u will just ignor it. But we can see the craters on the earth. This is evidence. But u will just ignor the craters and then try to tell others the world is 6000 yrs old, with stuff u can't see (micro-science), but the craters prove that your (here-say) evidence is flawed. Why not deal with stuff everybody can see wth their eyes to prove your point easily to the masses! I asked these questions and I studied science and i got my answer, the craters, which aren't going away.
@Mayburyj Last little note (my friend). U say that our science is flawed (and u present micro here-say evidence). Then u say that Aaron's stick (turning into a snake) is science? Then u wonder why we laugh @ u. Sure our universe does incorporate miricles (like the universe being really small, of which black-holes are evidence). But our miracles are a bit more subtle than Aaro's stick. What physical laws doe's this follow? (Harry Potter laws!)
I don't think it's the most critical question. It's hard to be sure from the evidence. Radio isotope give very long dates and the light from the stars seems to have been travelling for a very long time, there are speculated reasons for these but nothing solid. There are other evidences that point to a much younger earth, salt in sea, C14 in atmosphere not reaching equilibrium yet, which are hard to reconcile with an old earth. Old universe, young creation? I don't really know.
@Meathead36 Are u trying to say that they despise Jesus because they believe in an old earth? So u say the world is fairly old (but not billions of yrs) like the book " It Can't just Happen" By Lawrence O. Richards.(Tommy Nelson books). Or are you a gap theory creationist (with billions of years)! If you are interested, squizz through my videos (on my channel) and u will see some theism!
@Meathead36 Do you think it's logical to postulate that the radoiactve decay was accellerated in the past by a factor of at least 750,000 times more intense? Do you think it's logical for the water level to go up past mount everest (and without causing total collaps of earth's crust and causing massive vocanism and earthquakes). Do you think it's logical that all the impacts over a dozen comfirmed impacts (estimated 0ver 50) that left craters that are over 50 km diam.
@Meathead36 Some of these craters are over 100 km diam and some are around 200km diam (and over)! How much soil in a 200 km crater (that is not there anymore). Volume = pye r squared x average (original) depth of crater. I don't know the original depth (guessing about 10 k- 20k) going by the shape of more recent, or craters on the moon. So average (original) depth say is 5 km Just for this argument. I just read that the initial hole is about a quarter the diam. So 5 is CONSERVATIVE!
@Meathead36 So the initial hole is filled in again nearly instantly after OVER 150,000 CUBIC KMs of soil is moved (instantly). How much energy would be REQUIRED to do this? And that's only ONE impact, We have about nine or so that are over over 70 km diam and TWO confirmed impacts (by iridium and tektites around the rim) that are larger than 200 km and one (unconfirmed) one that is 500 km diam. It is under sediment, distictly round and probabably too big to be volcanic.
@Meathead36 Billions of years is the ONLY way to explain it. Most are proven so u can't say they are features of the flood (unless u say the features have rare substances (like iridium) and tektites (glass marble formations). Theyt formed by intense heat, hotter than volcanoes. HOW CAN WATER FORM TEKTITES? (you are silly enough to say they are "stone washed" all around the rim of the crater and nowhere else. You can't deny them (but many still do) and so you "put" them in the flood.
@Meathead36 But putting them in the flood poses a BIG problem. I showed u the simple math and u are made aware of the explosive power. Billions of years explains it and strikes happened average every 60 million years or so. But putting them in the flood poses a question ; HOW WOULD ANYTHING SURVIVE all those impacts over a period of one year? How come the sea creatures are not all extinct (except, maybe, a few microbes). How come the jelly-fish survived and the trilobites didn't.
@Meathead36 Sorry for hounding u but I was reding your comments about logic! Mainstream science incorporates miricles. One instant one and the others are "slow magic". The big bang is like God waving a magic wand (so-to-speak) and particles same out (not cows and horses and things). And we can say they are "designer particles" and they eventuall (over billions of years) became us and the universe as we see it now. Evolution can also show a designer (with particals that can do this).
@Meathead36 So there's enough magic in science to make us wonder without having to revert to old (flat earth) HARRY POTTERY. U say u are logical and u believe things like Aaron's stick turning into a snake (instantly). Then u call it sceince (whare's the logic in that). Your science is not regarded as science because it incorporates Harry Potter type miracles. Science can't prove or disprove a miracle and so Harry Potter type miracles are not science.
@Meathead36 Your miracles are against the physical laws and u can't postulate a young earth without RADICALLY rewriting the science books (and adding Harry Pottery to it). And u can't even postulate a young earth without REWRIGHTING THE BIBLE as well!
@Justwantahover Trying reading the Bible before you condemn it. It is pretty clear the earth was renewed and we were placed on it. It is also clear the earth has been around for a very very long time. Now, is that so hard to understand? The physical laws you refer to pertain to the dimension we live in. Science has proven there are in fact other dimensions (Carl Sagan agrees). We are dealing with the supernatural. Forget what you think you "know". Sagan's view isn't far off from mine.
@TheScienceFoundation Save your miniscule insights and feckless observations for your fellow simeans found in the fantasy drawings at the local natural history museum.
@doobersmanster If anyone is driving people away from religion, it's the fundamentalists. BereanBeacon and the like are basically telling people they have to be moronic to be a christian.
@TheScienceFoundation I don't know what you are talking about..how is this video Moronic ? Christians are only acting logically based on their pre-suppositions. Ther is nothing moronic about Logic.If you don't believe the premises tobe true then that is your perogative, but to name call people that are truly seeking to do what is right by man and God moronic, is not addresing the premises. You are acting according to your premises, which I deem false according to evidence.
@doobersmanster It's easy to debunk your young earth FANTASY! There are impact craters (proven by iridium and tektites) that areover 200 km diam. The volume of soil and rock moved INSTANTLY would be over 100,000 cubic kms!!! Imagime the energy required to do that. Yecs put ALL the impacts in the flood. There's no way the arc would have survived and how come the sea creatures survived! No way!
@TheScienceFoundation How can you not say that the information in this video is not evidence?I cannot comprehend what keeps a person from accepting reality..just becasue you don't like what the facts tell you, does not mean it is not true..Face it God is real and the archaeological evidence proves it. Do you want to talk to a three gram aday heroin addict that was healed in one day through Jesus? What evidence do you need?It is everywhere,all around you God's fingerprints
@TheScienceFoundation How can you not say that the information in this video is not evidence?I cannot comprehend what keeps a person from accepting reality..just becasue you don't like what the facts tell you, does not mean it is not true..Face it God is real and the archaeological evidence proves it. Do you want to talk to a three gram aday heroin addict that was healed in one day through Jesus? What evidence do you need?It is everywhere,all around you God's fingerprints.
@seekerofgod7777777 The creationist conspiacy has a will continue to have the most catastrophic straglehols on suppressing human knowledge in recorded history, so what is needed is to bring to light out of shadow is more virulent attack on this stupid young earth conspiracy (by using impact craters).
@seekerofgod7777777 I find u prticularly offensive (and so I particularly ddispise u because are saying that (if sombody dosn't believe in a young earth, they are evil. The earth is OBVIOUSLY old (you liar) and I tke offence from all of you that think I'm evil!
People dont realize HOW LUSH North America was! It would make the Serengeti look like a petting zoo! Bison twice the size of modern ones,Sloths weighing 5 tons! Mamoths,Mastadons,Giant short faced bears!,American lions 25% larger than modern lions!
Saber toothed cats! glyptodonts the size of a mid sized car! not to mention all the other mid to small fauna that lived with these beasts.
All were wiped out in the flood, not disease, CERTAINLY not man,no commet strike, but a FLOOD!
realistromeo 1 week ago
soon there is to be a global hive organism. A.I., singularity event, trans-humanism, nanotech, internet, and gene sequencing. Genesis 1, 6, and 11.
JoeCavy4 1 month ago
@JoeCavy4 yep We are heading into times that are going to bring about the the Day of the LORD.
doobersmanster 1 month ago
like the new term WEFAs
plenty of them trolling your vids
neoverse 1 month ago
@neoverse what is a "WEFA?"
roaringwaterbay 1 month ago
@roaringwaterbay
It's in the video
neoverse 1 month ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Evolutionists and their effeminate followers are so dishonest that it is laughable. The militant homosexual community does everything that it can do fight against God and the Bible. We see examples of this right here on this channel and all through youtube.
thechessstick 1 month ago
@thechessstick what evidence?
roaringwaterbay 1 month ago
@thechessstick If u really think the world is 6000 yrs old, u will look into this one, of which most yecs arrogantly ignor. With this one, no yec has had the last word (and I have won nearly ten times in a row, so far). If they really think the world is young (and if it was) they would challenge me, but they can't and it will be the same with you, my friend. I am talking about the impact craters on earth. Evidence we all can see with their eyes, that the world is dfinitely old!
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@Justwantahover LOL. And how do you date impact craters? What a joke. They could well have occurred after Noah's Flood. What's the big deal? Why there are even guyots (flat tops, submerged islands) that are a mile under the Pacific Ocean. This is easily explained and in excellent accord with the Genesis account. Please.... Next softball pitch.
thechessstick 1 month ago
@thechessstick Cool! u said the Bible described an impact (sound like one). But I think it's just a fictitious "effect" like in star-wars or the lord of the rings. The Bible is poetry collected and put together by do-gooder spin-doctors. Poetry with deep meaning (sometimes). Do u take "The Ancient Marina" literaly or do u just get some sort of artistic sensation from it? I asked one of my friends "How can u understand that astrology crap"? He said, "u just feel it".
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@Justwantahover You need to do a search for Ron Wyatt right here on youtube. He found Noah's Ark, the real Mount Sinai, the Red Sea Crossing site, the Ark of the Covenant and several other proofs of the Book of Genesis. Keep seeking. But don't let evolution and that "billions or years" crap retard your learning process. I call that "evolutardation".
thechessstick 1 month ago
@thechessstick U can't argue with cubic capacity of the craters and the volume of soil excavated. And u can"t argue with the energy to move that volume of soil immediately. How many nuclear bombs would be required to excavate thousands of cubic kms? Do u know how much soil is in just one cubic kilometer? Can u imagine one big cube a km wide, a km long and a km high. Can u picture how much soil that is? No u can't because your a yec!
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@thechessstick Can't u just say that the impacts happened before he created the vegetation and land animals (I have my creation glasses on). This solves a lot of problems and one yec said that a lot of things (like pink flying saucers) could happen that's not mentioned in the bible. But craters have varied stages of erosion and date differently. They are dated easily because melt rock restars clock. About dating! It's too small to see so it's no good to show the masses.
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@thechessstick I won't talk about dating (with my evolution glasses on) and I won't talk about something I can't understand (and we can't see). I will talk about dating (with my creation glasses on). The RATE team scower the rock s to find evidence (that we can't see) of a young earth and for most (like dating) is not evidence (unless they go to uni for 10 yrs). The RATE team have and ,by day, they date rocks for (mainstream) science. It's their job. They take data that they deny!
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@thechessstick The rate team go along with the data for their job but do't believe it! But they say that the dating system is not 100% but it's not inaccurate enough for the vast dif in age of earth. So they say there MUST was a period acceleration in the past. Now just the weakness of this argument debunks a young earth (straight-away). The great thing (for me) about the RATE team is that they are rock scientists and yecs and they prove that the dating system is sound!
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@thechessstick Just give u a bit of time to "put your evolution glasses on" and Google impacts on earth and "put your creation glasses on" and see what the yec sites say. Most say flood but some just deny (but they are proven). Discuss the craters in a creationism sminar etc. And tell them flood is not acceptable (for obvious reasons) and (same story) for after the flood! (There's record of Pompai but no record of one single strike 1000s x larger than Pompai) The world is old!
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@thechessstick Would u acept creation day meteors strikes theory? (I'm only curious). Does it conflict with the Bible too huch?.If u accept it, tell your friends the creation scientists are flawed (with flood and deny theory) because we obviously would't be here. If you dont accept creation strike theory, u can't accept a young earth can u! Study impacts and study yec sites (glasses on). Help yecs get act together(if u want to argue) and it helps us too! ( I told u I would win)!
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@thechessstick There are many impacts over30km diam craters. They proven by iridium and other rare substances around the rim, as well as tektites (glass marble formations). There are adozon or so of craters over 50 km diam, a few over 100 km, four that are nearly (and over) 200 km diam! Now try to argue with this. Volume = pye r squared x (average) depth. Initial excavation depths about 1/4 diam. But for a 200 km cr will will say average depth is 5 km (but could be a lot more).
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@Justwantahover First of all it is not proven that they are impact craters. 2ndly if you want to be scientific at all then you have to do controlled experiments before you start stating things as fact. So, you need to take an earth-like planet and smash an asteroid into it and see how its life fares. Until you can do an experiment like this you are only speculating. Watch a few a Ron Wyatt videos.
thechessstick 1 month ago
@thechessstick (2) This makes it 3.14 x 100 x 100 x 5 = 157,000 CUBIC kms!! How much explosive power would be required to excavate that much soil and rock (instantly)? There is a crater that is 250 km diam and one that is 300 km diam (plus all the 160 others over 1k with many over 10 km, 20 km, 30 km! Billions of years is the only way to explain it! and u cant argue with simple cubic capacity. And u can't argue with simple energy required to shift all thi soil instantly. But u ...
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@thechessstick (3) Billions of years allows for the strike to happen once in millions of years and the earth regenerates between strikes (and r-dating is different for craters). But u put them in the flood, or u deny that they are impacts (while most are proven by iridium and tektites). Putting them in the flood only makes the problem worse because u have them all striking within a year. How come the ark (and all those sea creatures) survived. Can u account for the craters ...
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@thechessstick (4) Can u account for the the craters without rewriting the Bible, my friend? The good news version sounds like very good news (when it comes to the flood) and is nothing like the yecs recon it was. U say that our science is not science then u say that Aaron's (stick turning into a snake) is science! What physical laws does this foliow? (Harry Potter laws of physics). What laws of physics does an asteroid strike (the size of mount everest) going 40,000 mph follow!
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@Justwantahover Craters are easily accounted for. Do you know that the Bible even says that a fire mountain is one day going to crash into the sea killing the seas life? LOL.
thechessstick 1 month ago
@thechessstick Are u really saying they may have struck after the flood. U know how much damage was done at Hiroshima and how much publicity (we all know of it). And it was the same when this sort of destruction happenes thousands of years ago; the same publicity (and everyone knows about it (even now). Pompai! An atom bomb leaves a hole about 200-300 meters diam. Volume of this crater is only a small fraction of one cubic km. This is so much less than 157,000 cubic kms!
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@thechessstick Need I say anymore? Oh! That's right; yr a yec...yes I do have to say more. The difference in power required (to excavate a given volume of soil) has to be similar to the difference in soil volume. So it's obvious that if even one (that size) struck (in the last 4000 yrs) we would't be here (simple). I could argue about why the water above mt Ev didn't collaps crust, but that's fantasy. I'm sticking to what is real...the craters. Tell your friends about them!
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@thechessstick Oh! U said "What's the big deal" (about the craters). Well, u see it's realy significant! We wouldn't be here if all those went off in the last several thousand yrs. We wouldn't be here if just one of the big ones struck in the last million yrs, so how could we be here if the world is 600 yrs (but u choose to ignor this). As if we would still be here! Please explain to me how we are here in a young earth while the craters are here too. No yec has and they can't.
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@thechessstick I said 600 yrs (my apology). I ment 6000 yrs.
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@thechessstick To say "what's the big deal" (about the craters) and just walk away and later go and preach a young earth to (poor sods who wouldn't know) in my mind is a crime and is he just another yec liar. Listen and take notice of the truth before u go on lying. I'm sorry my friend, don't be sad (I'm certainly not) the world is old.
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@Justwantahover We wouldn't be here? Can you cite the experiments? I need to see the data.
thechessstick 1 month ago
@thechessstick I told u that u would just ignor the craters (does this mean that u are ignorant)? If the world is 6000 yrs old, u should be able to easily explain why the craters are here, and we are here too! But u can't (casting doubt on a young earth). U choose to ignor the craters (that are actually real) and go on with (here-say bits of wood (that could come from anything) about a fantasy. I win, if that's the case. And I knew I would win this one, right from the start! HA HA
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@thechessstick (1)"I need to see the data". Share this with your yec friends (who can understand math for 12 yr olds). Data: crater 200km, excavated volume = 150,000 cubic kilometers! Derived from pye r squared x (average) depth. Most craters max depth = 1/4 diam. Average depth is 1/4 of that. This is about !0 km( but we half this to go your way and to be conservative). So it is 5 km! (average depth) so this comes to (over) 150,000 cubic kms. of soil that is initially excavated.
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@thechessstick (2) Data; an atom bomb will make a crater about 300 meters diam which is a volume about 5,000,000 cubic meters. One cubic km is one-billion cubic meters. So the A bomb moves only a small fraction of one cubic km. And u would have to agree that (to move MORE soil, it requires MORE explosive power). So u would have to agree that to move just one cubic km of soil (like a 3km crater) u will need 1000s of A bombs. And (a 3km) crater impact is just a little one!
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@thechessstick (1) So u are arguing with the fact that there are tektites around the rims of the craters (glass marble formations). These are never seen at volcanoe craters and the scientists say that (heat of much higher temperature) is needed to form tecktites (that were molten) during impact. Iridium is a common substance in a fair few meterites found but is a rare substance on earth. The irridium is concentrated around the rim but is in traces all over crater. u are a good ...
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@thechessstick U are a good person 2 argue with. It's competitive sport, not war! Mythbusters did an exp to bust a hollywood myth (is an underwater swimmer safe from gun shot)? Answer : Yes, as long as it is a high powered rifle! The high powered bullets dis-integrated! Also a crater geologist fired bullets into sand and the bullets alo disintegrated. So the scientists know the meteors disintegrate because of the exp and because of the scattered rare substaces (like iridium).
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@thechessstick U are also aruing with amount of explosive power and I already showed u. Scientists have done exp (and u say where is the exp and don't give me that rubbish about ovserving one and we couldn't but even if Im inacurate by a thousond-fold I would still win). But pure simple math says I'm accurate witthin 50% each way. It's simple volume of crater. If an A-bomb makes a 300 meter diam crater, how many A- bombs make a 3 km crater? Answer (within 50% each way) : 1000
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@thechessstick 1000 A bombs to make a 3km crater. How did I come to that figure? The volume of the 3km crater is 1000 times more volume of soil than the 300 meter crater. That is because the 3km crater is 10 times the diameter (it's just lenght x breadth x depth). 10 x lenght, 10 x breadth and 10 x depth = 1000 times volume. So if there is 1000 x volume of soil, it is resonable to say (50% each way) that the A-bombs required would be 1000 (500-1500) A-bombs to make a 3km crater.
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@Justwantahover I told u the data before (three times) but u won't study it and then tell me to give u the data. All you need is cubic capacity which can be easliy assessed, for proof beyond any doubt whatsoever (which is better than reasonable doubt). I don't know if you really are that dumb or you are just playing dumb (but it's obvious). Give me an answer (if u can) so u can win (but I know u can't because the world is old). A 30 km crater is only a little one! OOH! OOH! OOH!
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@thechessstick Experiment Scientist have done experiments with nucllea bombs to see what size crater they make and they measur diam and calculate volume etc. So they can assess power of impacts by collecting size data from the impacts. Material moved wieght can be (fairly accurately) assessed by known weight of soil. It's then just physics for a given mass to be excavated (simple). Even if it was 200% inacurate (but I recon less than 30%) I still have absolute proof (HA HA).
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@thechessstick I have been reading your coments (feel guilty already do you). Jesus said to love thy neighbour and to not judge others! (What are you doing?). I'm a sap and have my beliefs too (but it's not science). God: "That was a great honour to get recognition for such an ahivement and it means so much to me". " This organism is undergoing vocal communication and the peptides that are associated with reward are flowing down arteries in his neck and veins and into his cells."
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@thechessstick In last comment, I said "This organism is" etc I mean't to say Science: "This organism is undergoing vocal communication etc". I forgot to put Science: in front of it (so you get the joke).
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@thechessstick If you do accept creation strikes u maybe stiil can say only creation and 6000 yrs can be true (because we are here).
Otherwise the craters are saying that olnly evolution and billions of yrs can be true (because we are here).
Justwantahover 1 month ago
Here is another video demonstrating that Piltdown is off limits to creos. Not until creos adopt codes of ethics and conduct. If creationism is allegedly so virtuous, why do creos so often resort to fabrications and deceptions? Crying that there is somekind of "conspiracy" intended to prevent creos fabrication from the light of day is merely a diversion to hide the fruadulant conduct of creos. People need learn standards. Simply claiming conduct in the name of God, does not make it honest.
lawilson200 1 month ago
@lawilson200 A whip for the horse, a bridle for the ass, and a rod for the fool's back. Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him. Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own conceit. Proverbs 26:3-5
warneveryonedotcom 1 month ago
@warneveryonedotcom So you are playing the role of a hypocrite, in addition to the role of a perjurer and an idolator. Christ often warned us to beware of people who are false. Thank you for deomonstrating that you are one of them.
However, in any world, your retort is meaningless. What does your ill use of scripture have to do with creo's who are incapable of developing any standards at all? Would you buy a used car from a dealer with a rep of selling lemons because he is a Christian?
lawilson200 1 month ago
@lawilson200 I would buy a used car from a christian before I would an evolutionist.Evolutionists are just like used car salesmen,selling broken down theories.You mentioned conspiracy?Well it was the very same teachers who said to us we bought America from the Indians,Well the fact is that it was stolen from them.So why wouldn't they lie about evolution they have lied about history already.Once they lie you can not believe anything they teach anymore,this goes for anybody atheist or not.
korzon 1 month ago
@korzon
"I would buy a used car from a christian " Not surprising. I still vividly remember when Tim Bakker was exposed misspending donation money to his PTL theme park and residency, including a $45,000 air conditioned dog house, he was still able to raise hundreds of thousands of dollars from people willing to overlook his excesses
The rest, is nust complete nonsense. I have noticed though, you did not answer my question.
lawilson200 1 month ago 2
@lawilson200 Please explain these alleged fabrications. So far, the only thing you have managed to accomplish is to hurl ad hom attacks and insults, not once yourself offering anything to counter act or rebutal the evidence...typical. And you are still using Piltdown man? A known fraud? That is a pretty sad deployment on your part. Evoes.....very funny stuff. Straining at a gnat while swallowing a camel.
3gdosrsfs 1 month ago
@3gdosrsfs Seriously. Have you even tried to read the reference article? It is poorly written with many grammer and a few spelling errrors. The writter basis a lot of his assertions on conjectures and provides no actual evidence to support his claim.
All too often theis is typical. Since this came from Texas is not surprising, considering the equally discredited Paluxy Footprints.
Snelling admitted Creos need to adopt some standards. Perhaps you should listen to him.
lawilson200 1 month ago 2
two people hate the truth
gr8vibes2 1 month ago
Lol not one comment about the article just arguments that have nothing to do with the video.So are there or are there not Giant skulls and bones found?If you go to Turkey you can see them for youreself,as they won't put them in American museums for sure.I have seen them myself,with my own eyes,some fairy tales can be true.
korzon 1 month ago
@korzon You also claimed to have seen a mountain form in <exico with your very own eyes as well.
Like that mountain, I'm sure you can't provide one picture, or single piece of evidence to support the existence of these giant bones.
Craigmw45 1 month ago in playlist More videos from BereanBeacon
@Craigmw45 You can go see them in Turkey as they don't suppress the truth there.Also south America has many of these fossils too.When you people don't like the evidence you throw it out,that is not science.It is called lying.And I wouldn't expect you people to put anything in a museum that contradicts youre belief so it's no big suprise to me.And the fossils in Turkey looked quite real to me,actualy mutch larger than I expected them to be.Go see them for youreself as all are welcome to.
korzon 1 month ago
@korzon How about a study of these giant fossils. Verified pictures? Anything?
You must realize that I'm not going to go to turkey to find these. Or accept that they just are there, when so many of the other claims of other giants have been disproven over the years.
Though why, specifically, do you think these would be a problem for evolution? I can't see why they would at all. I just doubt their existence, because I have not seen any evidence for my self.
Craigmw45 1 month ago
@korzon OF course they don't want to read or comment on the article. They'd look even more idiotic trying to argue against facts. Evolutionists are masters at using speculation and conjecture to try to make their arguments sound intellegent, which is in itself kind of funny because they dont believe in intellegence...except their own...which they cant for the life of themselves explain how it came to be, except for some convoluted nonsense about chemicals...which is only the catylist BTW
3gdosrsfs 1 month ago
@3gdosrsfs Yes they look at the effects but never the cause.Then they fabricate a cause for their effect they have observed.Real science is watching a cause make an effect,then we can call something a fact.But they woould rather call it theory so when they are proved to be wrong they say well thats how scince works we just guess at it till we get it right.That is not science and we should not teach people things in school till we know the facts,otherwise we create a generation of ignorance.
korzon 1 month ago
@korzon Horrific misunderstanding of theory and fact, in science they're different things and not rungs on a ladder of increasing certainty. Theories model and explain the behaviors of facts and phenomena
TheScienceFoundation 1 month ago
Nephilim
MichaelHodgson 1 month ago
I have come to the conclusion that atheist have chosen to go to hell. The bible tells us that God him self will have to enlarge the walls of hell to hold all those that have chose to go there, What a shame this is when the real truth is staring them right in the face. I will continue to pray for all the atheist that they see the truth before its to late, God have mercy on all of us, And God bless us all.
349mikval 1 month ago
From 1886...how very current... *eyeroll*
Lynchpinn101 1 month ago
This proves EVERYTHING is bigger in Texas, haha!
RefinersFire298 1 month ago
All those movies and TV shows that have the government hiding away all these antiquities that they deem as "dangerous", are so true. As a last ditch effort to suppress the truth. They spout: "conspiracy conspiracy; when you should blindly trust your leaders".
Howie47 1 month ago
The Giants did exist from Genesis after all...
POC777 1 month ago
Another example the powers of darkness suppressing the Truth, and organizations like the Smithsonian have been complicit.
fellowservant34 1 month ago
@fellowservant34 Yep people need to know how radical and suppressive the smithsonian is..they are pathetic and have lost all proffessional credibility.
doobersmanster 1 month ago
The evolutionary conspiracy has and will continue to have the most catastrophic strangleholds upon human conscience in recorded history, so what is needed to bring light out of shadow is a more virulent form of attack, with a wholly methodical and pernicious take no prisoners mentality to fuel the offensive, with nothing resembling in any way shape or form the tepid responces of late which never brings the offenders to accountability or penality.
These liars deserve neither Clemency nor mercy.
seekerofgod7777777 1 month ago
@seekerofgod7777777 So true! They need tob charged..they have helped in this deciet for too long and kept the truth hidden from the people...as a result many thousands are burning in hell now..how can mankind punish such a tragic crime? it is sad.
doobersmanster 1 month ago
@doobersmanster Brother You/We Get It!!! :) I wish ALL The Creationists who support this channel would turn up the heat on all these evo-trolls to hellish levels and drop the luke warm folly of tolerance which only encourages those who're cold to become frozen.
You've done some fine work here, so keep it up and we'll ALL finish the race as a "Workman Approved"
seekerofgod7777777 1 month ago
@seekerofgod7777777 They don't 'turn up the heat' because most creationists realize they're incapable of being a creationist and having an intelligent discussion on matters such as biology etc.
TheScienceFoundation 1 month ago
@TheScienceFoundation When I was in university the top GPS students including myself consisted of all creationists. At the bottom were atheists with very few exceptions. I'm willing to bet it's the same in most if not all universities regardless of subject area. I work in the scientific field. Guess who the most logical people I work with are? I'm telling you this first hand sir. It's not open for debate.
Meathead36 1 month ago
@Meathead36 What school? What year? What field do you work in and what evidence is it you think supports creation or contradicts evolution? I wouldn't doubt that you made every bit of that up on the spot. You're right about one thing, it's not up for debate that creationists are the least intelligent demographic even among theists in general.
TheScienceFoundation 1 month ago
@TheScienceFoundation I could post all of what you requested but honestly, what would be the point? You still wouldn't believe it. You are locked into one point of view. You completely ignore all evidence right in front of your nose if it doesn't suite your distorted logic. That's the point of this video and you have proven it well. I would ask you to look into the top students in you local university but you won't. Why? Because it would force you to reconsider your paradigm logically.
Meathead36 1 month ago
@Meathead36 What evidence? That's the point of me and others continually correcting these videos, repeating the same garbage ad nauseum is not a valid argument.
TheScienceFoundation 1 month ago
@Meathead36 I had some faith (20 yrs ago). Then I read the Bible and that was a turning point. I couln't swallow 900 yr old people etc (just like "The Lord of The Rings" and Harry Potter). So my faith went out the widow (so to speak). I go by science and feasibility (not Harry Pottery). But I'm still a sort-of theist (but an agnost ic one). I'm still a sap (maybe it's the God gene in me).
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@Justwantahover it's exactly what they want. Do you really want the truth? All you have to do is ask. Just say this. Jesus, are you real? did you die for me? I want the truth. If you really do want the truth he will show you...if you don't, he won't. You have to decide whether you want the truth or more of their fairy tales that lead you down roads that will be never ending.
artsychic2000 1 month ago
@artsychic2000 Do u reckon the world is 6000 yrs old?
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@Justwantahover There may be some hope for you after all friend. You can also find a great deal of evidence for the existance of God outside the Bible. One example is the elites of the this world. I'm an expert on the occult. Believe me when I tell you, they worship Lucifer. They are also the ones that have written the history books and formed the organized religions of this world. I assure you, they despise Jesus Christ alone. There can only be one reason for their behaviour.You can guess why.
Meathead36 1 month ago
@Justwantahover I would agree with you on truth and reality. oddly 900year old people is not a bit to doubt though. It does seem extraordinary but geneticists are talking about extending human life over 300 years because there is no technical reason why we can't live much longer. The reason we age is mostly a) running out of regeneration cycles (look up "telomeres" and b)genetic mutations. telomere length decreases with generations and mutations increase, giving a downward force on lifetimes.
Mayburyj 1 month ago
Part 2-
Healthier nutrition and medical intervention have created an upward lifetime pressure but genetic based problems like leukaemia are still on the increase.
If you started with "perfect" genetic instructions the early drop off rate due to mutations would be fast (particularly after a population bottleneck).
If you plot the ages of people after the flood they fit extremely well with a standard error accumulation/functionality graph.
Mayburyj 1 month ago
Part 3-
If the Bible was made up why would it claim such absurd sounding ages which don't make sense until we have a good understanding of genetics and biological systems. It is one of the bits that make me clearer that it is truthful. If you were making up a story you would have things that made sense with your current understanding of reality but would be proved wrong by future research, or did the writers understand genetics and heredity?
Mayburyj 1 month ago
@Mayburyj I know if I was going to make something up..Why this? It does not make sense. you are so right.
doobersmanster 1 month ago
@Mayburyj Have u read the mainstream version (of which in some cases they find it difficult). The yecs scower through all the scientific evidence to look for "weak spots" (so to spesk) and occasionally u can get a yec story (that u just mack-up,mostly without any evidence or back-up what-so-ever. (eg. U put the impact craters in the flood and just state that all the impacts happened in one year, during the flood (of which is debunked by the impacts). This is science.
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@Mayburyj Read my crater thesis on this video, or see my video called"5 EASY WAYS TO DEBUNK A YOUNG EARTH". The 170 km diam impact crater excavated about 100,000 quubic kms of soil and rock (instantly). How much explosive power would be required to do this? Most are proven impacts by iridium and other substances around the rim, and tektites (glass marble formations). But this is only one impact! Billions of years is the only way to explain why us (and the sea creatures) are still here.
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@Mayburyj But u put them in the flood. This only makes the crater problem worse (and it debunks (good news bible) version of flood! The big problem is, if u put all the impact in the flood (how could anything survive? (except a few microbes). There is a 300 km diam crater and a 250 km one, and a few around 90-100 km and over a dozen over 50 km diam. There is one that is 24 km diam and is 5km deep. Now stand on the rim and look into the crater an say the world is 6000 yrs old.
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@Mayburyj And that's only a little one (but it's unusually deep). The initial excavatin is about a quarter of diam (and is quickly partialy refilled). Simple volume sum varifies cubic capacity initially excavated. So you cant argue with the force required to do this instantly! U cant deny them (and some yecs do) and if u put all the in the flood all striking within a year, u have a problem. And no yec has explained it (I win). The world is definitely old (because we are here)!
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@Mayburyj I suggest u (my friend) Google impacts from mainstream and yec sites (with your evolution and creation glasses on). With the craters I can debunk a young earth (with my evolution glasses on) and debunk the flood (with my creation glasses on)! The craters are (obviously)something u can see!!! Un like the salt theory or your silly r-decay accelerate theory (which is my main [creation glasses on] argument)! I suggest u yecs discuss the craters and at try to protect your young e.
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@Mayburyj No u will just ignor it. But we can see the craters on the earth. This is evidence. But u will just ignor the craters and then try to tell others the world is 6000 yrs old, with stuff u can't see (micro-science), but the craters prove that your (here-say) evidence is flawed. Why not deal with stuff everybody can see wth their eyes to prove your point easily to the masses! I asked these questions and I studied science and i got my answer, the craters, which aren't going away.
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@Justwantahover The Earth and the Universe is only about 6000 years old. Only a fool would believe otherwise.
thechessstick 1 month ago
@Mayburyj Last little note (my friend). U say that our science is flawed (and u present micro here-say evidence). Then u say that Aaron's stick (turning into a snake) is science? Then u wonder why we laugh @ u. Sure our universe does incorporate miricles (like the universe being really small, of which black-holes are evidence). But our miracles are a bit more subtle than Aaro's stick. What physical laws doe's this follow? (Harry Potter laws!)
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@Mayburyj Do u reckon the world is 6000 yrs old?
Justwantahover 1 month ago
I don't think it's the most critical question. It's hard to be sure from the evidence. Radio isotope give very long dates and the light from the stars seems to have been travelling for a very long time, there are speculated reasons for these but nothing solid. There are other evidences that point to a much younger earth, salt in sea, C14 in atmosphere not reaching equilibrium yet, which are hard to reconcile with an old earth. Old universe, young creation? I don't really know.
Mayburyj 1 month ago
@Meathead36 Are u trying to say that they despise Jesus because they believe in an old earth? So u say the world is fairly old (but not billions of yrs) like the book " It Can't just Happen" By Lawrence O. Richards.(Tommy Nelson books). Or are you a gap theory creationist (with billions of years)! If you are interested, squizz through my videos (on my channel) and u will see some theism!
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@Meathead36 Do you think it's logical to postulate that the radoiactve decay was accellerated in the past by a factor of at least 750,000 times more intense? Do you think it's logical for the water level to go up past mount everest (and without causing total collaps of earth's crust and causing massive vocanism and earthquakes). Do you think it's logical that all the impacts over a dozen comfirmed impacts (estimated 0ver 50) that left craters that are over 50 km diam.
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@Meathead36 Some of these craters are over 100 km diam and some are around 200km diam (and over)! How much soil in a 200 km crater (that is not there anymore). Volume = pye r squared x average (original) depth of crater. I don't know the original depth (guessing about 10 k- 20k) going by the shape of more recent, or craters on the moon. So average (original) depth say is 5 km Just for this argument. I just read that the initial hole is about a quarter the diam. So 5 is CONSERVATIVE!
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@Meathead36 So the initial hole is filled in again nearly instantly after OVER 150,000 CUBIC KMs of soil is moved (instantly). How much energy would be REQUIRED to do this? And that's only ONE impact, We have about nine or so that are over over 70 km diam and TWO confirmed impacts (by iridium and tektites around the rim) that are larger than 200 km and one (unconfirmed) one that is 500 km diam. It is under sediment, distictly round and probabably too big to be volcanic.
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@Meathead36 Billions of years is the ONLY way to explain it. Most are proven so u can't say they are features of the flood (unless u say the features have rare substances (like iridium) and tektites (glass marble formations). Theyt formed by intense heat, hotter than volcanoes. HOW CAN WATER FORM TEKTITES? (you are silly enough to say they are "stone washed" all around the rim of the crater and nowhere else. You can't deny them (but many still do) and so you "put" them in the flood.
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@Meathead36 But putting them in the flood poses a BIG problem. I showed u the simple math and u are made aware of the explosive power. Billions of years explains it and strikes happened average every 60 million years or so. But putting them in the flood poses a question ; HOW WOULD ANYTHING SURVIVE all those impacts over a period of one year? How come the sea creatures are not all extinct (except, maybe, a few microbes). How come the jelly-fish survived and the trilobites didn't.
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@Meathead36 Sorry for hounding u but I was reding your comments about logic! Mainstream science incorporates miricles. One instant one and the others are "slow magic". The big bang is like God waving a magic wand (so-to-speak) and particles same out (not cows and horses and things). And we can say they are "designer particles" and they eventuall (over billions of years) became us and the universe as we see it now. Evolution can also show a designer (with particals that can do this).
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@Meathead36 So there's enough magic in science to make us wonder without having to revert to old (flat earth) HARRY POTTERY. U say u are logical and u believe things like Aaron's stick turning into a snake (instantly). Then u call it sceince (whare's the logic in that). Your science is not regarded as science because it incorporates Harry Potter type miracles. Science can't prove or disprove a miracle and so Harry Potter type miracles are not science.
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@Meathead36 Your miracles are against the physical laws and u can't postulate a young earth without RADICALLY rewriting the science books (and adding Harry Pottery to it). And u can't even postulate a young earth without REWRIGHTING THE BIBLE as well!
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@Justwantahover Trying reading the Bible before you condemn it. It is pretty clear the earth was renewed and we were placed on it. It is also clear the earth has been around for a very very long time. Now, is that so hard to understand? The physical laws you refer to pertain to the dimension we live in. Science has proven there are in fact other dimensions (Carl Sagan agrees). We are dealing with the supernatural. Forget what you think you "know". Sagan's view isn't far off from mine.
Meathead36 1 month ago
@Meathead36 My view is far off to yours (but are u an old earther)?
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@Meathead36 "Science has proven there are in fact other dimensions (Carl Sagan agrees)."
No science hasn't proven the existance of other dimentions, and no Sagan didn't say we had.
Their MAYBE other dimensions, and they MIGHT have other physical laws, but we don't really know.
You'll also noticed I typed some words in CAPS. Mostly to highlight how important these so called weasel-words are to properly convey meaning.
Craigmw45 1 month ago
@TheScienceFoundation Save your miniscule insights and feckless observations for your fellow simeans found in the fantasy drawings at the local natural history museum.
seekerofgod7777777 1 month ago
@seekerofgod7777777 You've been making it abundantly clear for me that you're one of the few incapable of even trying to have an adult conversation.
TheScienceFoundation 1 month ago
@seekerofgod7777777 Read the blog I just made @ Meathead36.
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@seekerofgod7777777 Convince me that this "scull" is real!!!
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@doobersmanster If anyone is driving people away from religion, it's the fundamentalists. BereanBeacon and the like are basically telling people they have to be moronic to be a christian.
TheScienceFoundation 1 month ago
@TheScienceFoundation I don't know what you are talking about..how is this video Moronic ? Christians are only acting logically based on their pre-suppositions. Ther is nothing moronic about Logic.If you don't believe the premises tobe true then that is your perogative, but to name call people that are truly seeking to do what is right by man and God moronic, is not addresing the premises. You are acting according to your premises, which I deem false according to evidence.
doobersmanster 1 month ago
@doobersmanster It's easy to debunk your young earth FANTASY! There are impact craters (proven by iridium and tektites) that areover 200 km diam. The volume of soil and rock moved INSTANTLY would be over 100,000 cubic kms!!! Imagime the energy required to do that. Yecs put ALL the impacts in the flood. There's no way the arc would have survived and how come the sea creatures survived! No way!
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@Justwantahover you're outclassed here, justwantalover :(
seekerofgod7777777 1 month ago
@doobersmanster Because nothing in it is supported by any data whatsoever.
What evidence? Name a single piece.
TheScienceFoundation 1 month ago
@TheScienceFoundation How can you not say that the information in this video is not evidence?I cannot comprehend what keeps a person from accepting reality..just becasue you don't like what the facts tell you, does not mean it is not true..Face it God is real and the archaeological evidence proves it. Do you want to talk to a three gram aday heroin addict that was healed in one day through Jesus? What evidence do you need?It is everywhere,all around you God's fingerprints
doobersmanster 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheScienceFoundation How can you not say that the information in this video is not evidence?I cannot comprehend what keeps a person from accepting reality..just becasue you don't like what the facts tell you, does not mean it is not true..Face it God is real and the archaeological evidence proves it. Do you want to talk to a three gram aday heroin addict that was healed in one day through Jesus? What evidence do you need?It is everywhere,all around you God's fingerprints.
doobersmanster 1 month ago
@seekerofgod7777777 The creationist conspiacy has a will continue to have the most catastrophic straglehols on suppressing human knowledge in recorded history, so what is needed is to bring to light out of shadow is more virulent attack on this stupid young earth conspiracy (by using impact craters).
Justwantahover 1 month ago
@seekerofgod7777777 I find u prticularly offensive (and so I particularly ddispise u because are saying that (if sombody dosn't believe in a young earth, they are evil. The earth is OBVIOUSLY old (you liar) and I tke offence from all of you that think I'm evil!
Justwantahover 1 month ago
More conspiracy theories. Why am I not surprised?
Lombrette1657 1 month ago
@Lombrette1657 What's theoretical about hiding fossils from the public?
EdjeBos 1 month ago
@EdjeBos Nothing theoretical... just 100% pure bullshit.
Lombrette1657 1 month ago
@Lombrette1657 Because you're part of the problem.
seekerofgod7777777 1 month ago
@seekerofgod7777777 Oh, hi there! I was wondering how long before you showed up.
Lombrette1657 1 month ago
@Lombrette1657 Im the resident 800 pound Gorilla in the room.
seekerofgod7777777 1 month ago
@seekerofgod7777777 And almost as bright!
Lombrette1657 1 month ago
@Lombrette1657 And 10 times as Strong!
seekerofgod7777777 1 month ago
@seekerofgod7777777 But not nearly as bright!
Lombrette1657 1 month ago