Radii for stars is given in polar radius, that is, measured in the spin axis.
Sorry if the text goes fast. By the way, you might want to take a look to the MPL3D binary stars video. It shows a contact binary around minute 7:00 (similar to those 'peanut' stars ;o)
That's what the pause button is for. Not meant to be insulting, but just a tip that there is a pause button, in case you were wondering what you could use it for.
According to New Science Space, "a dense stellar corpse called a neutron star has been found spinning at an astonishing 1122 rotations per second 1.5 times faster than any other star. If confirmed, the finding could bolster the possibility of exotic "soft" states of matter inside dense stars."
And if our sun were the size of a garden pea, some stars are the size of a football stadium - a few even bigger.
See: YouTube's "The Real Perspective on the Solar System - With Music, (to the right).
I thought that at first, but figured physics would be involved in rotation speed. My first guess was during the evolution of the planet somehow the coming together of material created the speed of rotation. Do we know exactly what causes the amount of rotation of a planet? I'm interested to know.
I'd say that stars rotation starts with the initial rotation of the gas/dust cloud that they originated from. The initial spin of the cloud could be a result of magnetic, thermal and/or gravitational interaction of the particles. Over time, knots of material clump together and when the system condenses it inherits the inertia of that original spin. Not really sure, as we haven't been here long enough to tell.
Nice question, well you can imagine a Sun in the sky 23 times larger.
That is already huge, specially for spin radial velocities, around 15 million kilometers in radius, but it won't even reach Mercury, that orbits at around 45 million kilometers from the Sun center, at its nearer point to it.
The Sun is included as our known reference for comparison purposes, just that. Its spin rate is not specially slow, rather it helps to understand the extraordinary spin speeds of the real fast rotators.
I suspect that these are special odd-ball cases of stars that rotate unusually fast. The Sun may be much more representative of the majority of other stars.
I suspect that these are special odd-ball cases of stars that rotate unusually fast. The Sun may be much more representative of the majority of other stars.
Alpha Cygni? Yes, it is quite interesting because of its size and brightness, but according to my data, it does not really rotate very fast, sorry. As far as I know, it has a estimated rotational velocity around ten times that of our Sun, but since it is also 200 times bigger, it may need more than a year to complete one single revolution/turn.
Seriously though, blue stars are usually much hotter and short-lived compared to the Sun. I suspect if we lived near a blue star, we wouldn't have enough time to have evolved to the point where we'd wonder why it was blue, before it blew up on us.
I tried to maintain some order, so that's why it goes from smaller/slower stars (Sun) to the bigger/faster (Tsih). This way it goes in crescendo and the last star is the more impressive of them all. Therefore I recommend to watch it until the end!
why are they not a sphere?
5000mahmud 3 months ago
@5000mahmud, they are not a sphere because the high spin speed.
They spin so fast that they get deformated to an ellipsoidal shape, with an enlarged equatorial radius.
mpl3d 3 months ago
*deformed
mpl3d 3 months ago
@mpl3d ok but what will happen if you put a planet can you tell me plz
5000mahmud 3 months ago
@5000mahmud, yes, a planet can exist orbiting these type of stars. They will have an ellipsoidal shaped sun in the sky. Interesting, isn't it?
mpl3d 2 months ago
these are deadly dangerous stars no planets like earth could bare its violent behavior i like our sun( FOR NOW)
CHOPMOP10 7 months ago
@CHOPMOP10, quite true, we are fortunate :)
mpl3d 7 months ago
good job
TheSwanprincess16 1 year ago
@TheSwanprincess16, hey thanks.
mpl3d 1 year ago
The music cuts truly suck! Would have been better to let the 60's music just play from beginning to end.
FunkMan53 2 years ago
Indeed, the original uploaded video was that way. And the uploaded version was fine. Later, some YouTube processing damaged the audio.
Original version is available at mpl3d gallery web page.
mpl3d 2 years ago
When you give the radii, is that from pole to pole or across the equator?
The text goes by awfully fast. It's enough time to recognize the words, but not enough to absorb what they mean. For me anyway. :-)
nine9s 3 years ago
Radii for stars is given in polar radius, that is, measured in the spin axis.
Sorry if the text goes fast. By the way, you might want to take a look to the MPL3D binary stars video. It shows a contact binary around minute 7:00 (similar to those 'peanut' stars ;o)
mpl3d 3 years ago
That's what the pause button is for. Not meant to be insulting, but just a tip that there is a pause button, in case you were wondering what you could use it for.
rogerush 2 years ago
According to New Science Space, "a dense stellar corpse called a neutron star has been found spinning at an astonishing 1122 rotations per second 1.5 times faster than any other star. If confirmed, the finding could bolster the possibility of exotic "soft" states of matter inside dense stars."
And if our sun were the size of a garden pea, some stars are the size of a football stadium - a few even bigger.
See: YouTube's "The Real Perspective on the Solar System - With Music, (to the right).
MichaelRMcCoy 3 years ago
Interesting, indeed.
mpl3d 3 years ago
damn i didn't knew there were stars that actualy get bigger and smaller every few hours Pulsating Stars Hmm intresting
UltraMarine117 3 years ago
I would not want to be around that eruptive star..
solidsnake2112 3 years ago
There are some few stars whith rotations periods about only 1000 Hz!!!!!!! (rotations per second). These stars are called neutron stars.
wally2078 3 years ago
Is the variation in rotation time due to the mass of the object?
tegan71969 3 years ago
I don't really think so, although all factors matter. I guess it has more to do with the origin of the star and the way it was conformed.
mpl3d 3 years ago
I thought that at first, but figured physics would be involved in rotation speed. My first guess was during the evolution of the planet somehow the coming together of material created the speed of rotation. Do we know exactly what causes the amount of rotation of a planet? I'm interested to know.
tegan71969 3 years ago
I'd say that stars rotation starts with the initial rotation of the gas/dust cloud that they originated from. The initial spin of the cloud could be a result of magnetic, thermal and/or gravitational interaction of the particles. Over time, knots of material clump together and when the system condenses it inherits the inertia of that original spin. Not really sure, as we haven't been here long enough to tell.
mpl3d 3 years ago
Has the forming of a star or planet been observed in recent times?
tegan71969 3 years ago
I don't think so. That's what I mean, it takes so long that it cannot be observed.
mpl3d 3 years ago
Great but it was hard to visualize the huge sizes. 23 times the sun,would that reach earth? How big are these things compared to the solar system?
CadenRolland 3 years ago
Nice question, well you can imagine a Sun in the sky 23 times larger.
That is already huge, specially for spin radial velocities, around 15 million kilometers in radius, but it won't even reach Mercury, that orbits at around 45 million kilometers from the Sun center, at its nearer point to it.
mpl3d 3 years ago
太短了吧 太短了吧 太短了太短了吧
emilypalmer2 3 years ago
why does the sun take 25 days to rotate and most of the stars you featured less than a day. Is it your selection or just that the sun is slower...
googollearning 3 years ago
The Sun is included as our known reference for comparison purposes, just that. Its spin rate is not specially slow, rather it helps to understand the extraordinary spin speeds of the real fast rotators.
mpl3d 3 years ago
I suspect that these are special odd-ball cases of stars that rotate unusually fast. The Sun may be much more representative of the majority of other stars.
bbbl67 3 years ago
I suspect that these are special odd-ball cases of stars that rotate unusually fast. The Sun may be much more representative of the majority of other stars.
bbbl67 3 years ago
True, although fast-spinners are not so rare.
mpl3d 3 years ago
Thanks all for your comments.
mpl3d 4 years ago
what's the name of the song??
lunaticprophet 4 years ago
Glad you like it, it is "Cruise" by Funkie Monkie. It is a premiere.
mpl3d 4 years ago
Nice job!
bignewgame 4 years ago
mi perro mucho gusta la musica :) muy bien
RexNunc 4 years ago
como vinimos a parar en este increible universo??
darkblue64 4 years ago
Wow great video !! Thanks for posting!!
ORACLE063 4 years ago
BEAUTIFUL!!!!!!
eisabeth 4 years ago
Thank you very much :o)
mpl3d 4 years ago
my toes are dancing with the music
babegurlxazian 4 years ago
What can i say? Great video i was tranced by it! One of best video i ever seen
hopwas2007 4 years ago
Great! Thank you very much :o)
If you want to get tranced again, perhaps you'll enjoy my 'Sun lava' video.
mpl3d 4 years ago
I guess u r rite, i am not too keen with such specific details on every star
trongs01 4 years ago
No problem, I just commented it as an anecdote, and to share what I know so far. Always thankful for your interest.
mpl3d 4 years ago
I hear Deneb can be interesting since its rotational velocity is very high, giving it an egg shape
trongs01 4 years ago
Alpha Cygni? Yes, it is quite interesting because of its size and brightness, but according to my data, it does not really rotate very fast, sorry. As far as I know, it has a estimated rotational velocity around ten times that of our Sun, but since it is also 200 times bigger, it may need more than a year to complete one single revolution/turn.
mpl3d 4 years ago
Why can't we have a blue sun?
tornado1siren1geek 4 years ago
That would be spectacular, of course.
mpl3d 4 years ago
A Pink sun would be fine with me.
Buzzlybonk 4 years ago
How would we see it against the blue sky then? ;)
Seriously though, blue stars are usually much hotter and short-lived compared to the Sun. I suspect if we lived near a blue star, we wouldn't have enough time to have evolved to the point where we'd wonder why it was blue, before it blew up on us.
bbbl67 3 years ago
all your videos are awesome, thx!
WonderRaZ 4 years ago
Thanks a lot :o)
mpl3d 4 years ago
if you had a comparison of the sun and that last big star, this video would have been so much cooler!
10up 5 years ago
Well, thanks for the advice :o)
I tried to maintain some order, so that's why it goes from smaller/slower stars (Sun) to the bigger/faster (Tsih). This way it goes in crescendo and the last star is the more impressive of them all. Therefore I recommend to watch it until the end!
mpl3d 5 years ago
Cooler? Two Suns? :p
EmmyKokoro 4 years ago