Looks like someone had a lotta trouble getting the film started. In fact it never did start at all. Maybe you don't know to work the equipment?
Wow, how extremely lazy and sloppy! Plainly you didn't even bother to check the video before uploading it here for public viewing. How embarrassing! Well now I've checked it for you and it's a botch, an erroneous waste print. Why don't you throw it out and replace it with the real, proper copy of whatever it was that we were supposed to see, eh?
@WinstonSmith6079 wow, how extremely uncultivated of you not to check what the hell IS Arnul Rainer - then you'd find out about Richter and his Rhythmus and you would properly understand it. Next time, don't just assume somebody was too stupid to post something. And I dont know what kind of videos you expect youtube to have, but actually you can have fine art in here as well
@miniioana Okay, one day later, I do see now, having had time to give it further thought.
It seems to me that if some work of "art" requires foreknowledge of the "artist" that made it, then that is an example of self-indulgence. Self-indulgence is not synonymous with art nor with artistic talent.
But as far as there being fine art here on YouTube, yes, I, for one, would actually like to see that happen.
This has been flagged as spam show
everyone should see this film on 16mm. watching it on youtube just doesn't do the flickering justice.
CaesarSaladX 3 months ago
7 minutes of eye rape!
george4mon 6 months ago
Looks like someone had a lotta trouble getting the film started. In fact it never did start at all. Maybe you don't know to work the equipment?
Wow, how extremely lazy and sloppy! Plainly you didn't even bother to check the video before uploading it here for public viewing. How embarrassing! Well now I've checked it for you and it's a botch, an erroneous waste print. Why don't you throw it out and replace it with the real, proper copy of whatever it was that we were supposed to see, eh?
WinstonSmith6079 8 months ago
@WinstonSmith6079 wow, how extremely uncultivated of you not to check what the hell IS Arnul Rainer - then you'd find out about Richter and his Rhythmus and you would properly understand it. Next time, don't just assume somebody was too stupid to post something. And I dont know what kind of videos you expect youtube to have, but actually you can have fine art in here as well
miniioana 4 months ago
@miniioana Well, whatever. I don't see why any work of art necessitates foreknowledge of the artist and such to "get it". :I
WinstonSmith6079 4 months ago
@miniioana Okay, one day later, I do see now, having had time to give it further thought.
It seems to me that if some work of "art" requires foreknowledge of the "artist" that made it, then that is an example of self-indulgence. Self-indulgence is not synonymous with art nor with artistic talent.
But as far as there being fine art here on YouTube, yes, I, for one, would actually like to see that happen.
WinstonSmith6079 4 months ago
I noticed this is in 240p. Does anyone know where I can watch it in 1080p?
abaseraserhead 1 year ago
6:41 min wasted time
Oelf0815 1 year ago
WTF
cYw1982 1 year ago
it looks horrible! i saw it on 35mm and it was 123123123x better. I guess not better but it worked more.
vandrizzle 1 year ago
@vandrizzle What you saw was the film. This is not the film... it's something else... A preview transfer. Still glad it's here, somewhat.
safetydept 1 year ago
@AngeFauve this is so true
reelden 2 years ago
Joder, que me hagan estudiar esto en la universidad tiene cojones...
samuelcohen1 2 years ago
Kubelka is the artist arnulf rainer is the title
tschuuuly 2 years ago
This is nothing like watching an actual film print/
mikesxdestroy 3 years ago
¡¡Ostia, al final no se casan porque Bruce Willis está muerto!!!
¡¡Qué puta obra maestra!!!
shiuman 3 years ago 5
Vaya PEDAZO de puta mierda ¿no?
Mackensen 3 years ago
The only movie you can watch with your eyes closed.
But don't.
beautykilledbeast 3 years ago
no sé qué decir de esta obra "artseam"
elmarquesgalguero 4 years ago