The plain fact, clearly exposed in the video, remains that CNN colluded with Dem'rat candidates to HIDE THE FACT that DEMOCRAT PARTY ACTIVISTS were the ones asking the questions; NOT merely "undecided voters"; NOT merely you average Dem'rat citizen; NOT merely a politically unconnected voter, as the viewers were led to believe.
That is a purposeful FRAUD and DECEPTION.
And you're not dumb enough to not know all this, so stop publicly debasing yourself in defense of Democrat scum.
They were identified as "undecided Democrats". It is unimportant that a woman is identified as a culinary union member when she is asking a question about social security. Or that the chick who asked "diamonds or pearls" once interned for Harry Reid. That's a BS rule made up by you and Michelle Malkin.
You would not propose this crap for Tea Party activists (who are also just ordinary citizens). The only story here is that you don't like Democrats. Big whoop.
If your mind wasn't so easily led, this would be glaringly obvious to you that the purpose of the deception is to control the questions.
There is no shortage of registered Democrats -- "undecided voters" -- who are NOT Democrat party activists, who would like the opportunity ask a REAL question, like why Obama believes we can be taxed into prosperity or borrow our way out of debt.
But don't let the exposed Democrat deception stop you from trying to defend it.
"control the questions?" CNN's attempt to control questions had nothing to do with the affiliations of these people in their private life.
And there is no reason any undecided voter should be excluded from asking questions of candidates in primary debates. Unless there is a clear conflict of interest, there is no reason CNN needs to identify them as "activists". If they choose not to be identified as such its actually kind of invasive.
What makes you think this debate was open to the public? This was a November 2007 primary debate. At the beginning Blitzer says, “In the second part, we will hear directly from some of this group of about 100 undecided Nevada DEMOCRATS”
You and Malkin actually bring conservatives down when you try to portray this as media bias. The only controversy was when CNN handed the “diamonds & pearls” question to the one girl, who had a tougher question to ask. That was for their own sensationalist purposes, not because Clinton couldn’t handle a question on nuclear policy.
“However, they are Democrat party activists, and that salient point was hidden from the public."
If it was such a big secret, why did Obama give a shoutout from the stage to the culinary worker lady?? That you read conspiracy stuff into this is insane. Activists don't need to hide their agenda in a primary debate. Quite the opposite. Would Tea Party activists hide theirs in a GOP debate? It defeats their purpose! Malkin just thinks this is all secret because she's a lousy reporter.
Why would the speakers use their real names if this was a conspiracy? Why would their organizations send top level officials instead of 20 year-old interns to ask a memorized question? Seriously man, apply some critical thinking.
At least I'm writing on a page no one is using anymore. You seem to prefer ejaculating off-topic novellas in forums where you're sure to be ignored by 99% of the readers.
The funniest thing Iv'e ever seen on cnn is there latest commercial showing a elephant with the word FOX painted on the side and then a donkey with the letters msnbc painted on the sideof it, the above caption reads "cnn we don't take sides" HELLO!!. Ok for all the dead people that have just woken up from a 15 year nap a hot news flash, FOX news props the Republicans and all other news organizations prop liberal democrats.
This would be an intriguing, if not damning, question in the general debate. But this is an early Democratic Party debate—look at the large field of candiates. Both parties bases are by definition activist: Democrats for workers, minorities, and the environment; Republicans for corporations, arms dealers, and theocrats. It's no surprise that the most prepared candidates would know these activists, just as it is no surprise that CNN isn't going to ask a not-camera-ready person a question.
This would be an intriguing, if not damning, question in the general debate. But this is an early Democratic Party debate—look at the large field of candiates. Both parties' bases are by definition activist: Democrats for workers, minorities, and the environment; Republicans for corporations, arms dealers, and theocrats. It's no surprise that the most prepared candidates would know these activists, just as it is no surprise that CNN isn't going to ask a not-camera-ready person a question.
That's what Communists do, they infiltrate from the inside and get up front, posing as a majority viewpoint. Unfortunately [for them] this tactic is only useful when the real majority isn't as alert as the enemy is. Unfortunately, no one is as alert as a true Communist since they feel - and do not think.
Lou Dobbs, who the second guy mentioned, is the only trustworthy member of CNN (actually Glenn Beck too, but he is Headline News which is less conservative)
This isn't suprising at all. CNN is in the tank, and some of it's correspondants, susan malvo, dana bash, gloria borger, and so many others, are so in the tank it's unbelievable. and then they turn around and claim not to be
While Im a republican I dont see a problem with the undecided voters. This video is from a DEMOCRATIC primary so I only assume that those are undecided DEMOCRATIC voters. Why would they take questions form republicans at a DEMOCRATIC primary?
I frequent CNN all the time and do think they have a very liberal bias and are pushing a liberal agenda, but I dont see what CNN did wrong in this video.
Discovery in the case is expected to begin in May, 2008 as it proceeds to trial.
The discovery will expose an ongoing cover-up of the campaign finance crimes and the obstructions of justice directed by Hillary Clinton with the help of Bill Clinton and former DNC Chair Ed Rendell. The cover-up rivals Watergate in its corruption of each branch of government and the media.
campaign finance boy how come this is not on the air waves
POLITICIANS are the crib of the economic engine and are responsible for all rises in inflation all reforms and vetos and revolts and societal poverty! presidents are the ones responsible negating property rights through legalised extortion such as rising taxes rising home costs (when wallstreet can) all forms of cost inflation and rising costs is politicaly engineered! dont be swayed by lies
and bullshit on CNN trying to render innocent politics from the societal collapsing effects it creates
Sadly, Hillary is not very imaginative nor brilliant so to plant questions gives her control over the outcome. As a President she would be faced with situations where there would be no control and she must act instantly without planted questions. It appears that she is not up to the challenge.
If only all the immigrants to US are like Michelle Malkin standing up against immigrants, we can stop pretty much all kinds of immigration to this country. Perhaps some of Michelle folks from Philipines can be given some backdoor entry.
Yea its so sick how CNN= Politics. More like CNN= Thought control. The election again is going to be another brilliant shakespere act. Two puppets face off for the same master. Makes me puke Arnold is a bastard.
Very good video! You know, all the candidates seem to be that way. All the ones I've seen are completely rhetoric -- all talk and no do. Ron Paul is the only one (with a chance) whose "message" matches his voting record, so I've decided to go for him.
God what I would give to get some of these snot-nosed CNN flunkies to come down from their ivory towers, and get in front of a camera where THEY would have to answer questions!
watch wat u say on youtube, i said somethin bout the pres and helicopters started hovering over my house...wat ever happend to freedom of speech??? cant believe this shit
lol this is actually somewhat anal .. they were all people that represent a mass group of americans. Not undecided, that term was wolfs mistake and bad choice of words.... There was no attempt to hide who they were just a questionable term Undecided Voters from wolf..
Good video...however Michelle Malkin, you're guilty of spinning yourself. Ron Paul appeared on Alex Jones and you spun him into a paranoid delusional. You should be ashamed, you make money from the lie machine that is destroying this country. You are exactly what you claim to despise.
10 years ago the leftist USA media was fooling everyone. I do not understand why anyone could still be a democrat now that there is so much information out there.
In a nutshell this person has summed up the idiocy of leftist dogma.
Here are the problems with what you said:
1) who decides what speech is leftist or rightist that needs balancing?
2) what happens to broadcasting companies like air america or america right that have business models specifically catering to those people who want to hear ONLY left or right radio talk show hosts?
I'm done here bc you're most likely to ignore me and keep doing what your TV tells you to.
Republicans always bash the media for having a liberal bias. They always cry a river because they feel theyre SO oppressed by the MSDBLM(main stream drive-by liberal media) for short. If they feel so oppressed why dont they want politicans to sign the equal time ammendment which would regulate to ensure equal time? If regulating the free market is not the answer than whats the solution? I here alot of crying, but not alot of solutions.
Equal time means oppression and silence. It does not really mean equal time. Plus, if you read the legislation proposed, including the past Fairness Doctrine, you'll see that broadcast media is exempt. We need less regulation, not more. And we need to be able to prosecute liars when they endanger peoples lives or welbeing for a sensational story that turns out to be made up. As for journalists, I just want to see them get what is coming to them.
Save the date Guess what's coming? We are going to have a huge rally for Mike! When: December 10th, 2007 Where: Pan Pacific Park, 7600 Beverly Blvd. Los Angeles, California Time: 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. The Senator: He will be there to speak in person! 3:30 pm! There will be food and entertainment! Bring signs in support of Senator Gravel! It doesn't matter where you live. Come Celebrate! Pass the word! Checkout Interiorstate (dot) com/gravel (dot) htm Please donate Dec. 5th!
People, after 7 years of pre-screened audiences throwing softballs to our moron president, you're upset because people who are both voters and apparently undecided (although they're undoubtedly not trending Republican) are participating in a debate? Why is this even worth commenting on? The Bushies have trashed our legal system, political institutions, Treasury, and economy so thoroughly, Republicans deserve to be booed out of office.
rpeck you are a deranged moron. Spew your Bush derangement syndrome all you want, but I can't believe anyone with 2 brain cells would condone outright manipulation of our elective process by a major media outlet hand in hand with one of the political parties... If it's ok for CNN and the Dems to pull these stunts, then where does it end? Why bother with elections at all? You are truly deranged.
Can you believe this? People that are committed to various causes and/or active in politics actually stepping forward to ask questions of politicians vying for the White House?! The nerve of them! Shame on CNN for broadcasting legitimate speech about issues and our political process! Wait, what?
CNN REP DEBATE 11-28-07: Did you see/hear that ignorant fool, Jeff Toobin, the CNN "analyst" after the debate. He had no idea about the NAU or SPP. He said that the NAU/SPP "Was a figment of Ron Paul's imagination" . Video makers should have a field day with this!!!!
The Democrats sold out the working middle class. Both parties gave us NAFTA, WTO. Both trying to give us North American Union (NAU) CFR agenda. Google: CFR/NAU YTsearch - David Rockefeller Fears Ron Paul. Ron Paul is ANTI-CFR. Top Tier are all CFR. Especially Hillary and Guiliani. Follow the Money
Malkin, during commerical breaks the candidates go out to meet people and sometimes they talk to them. They also go through front, back, side of the debate hall. Occassionally they may have people, as GOP would. They sit in audience with the same concerns most Americans face. Get over yourself Malkin, you and neo-cons are dividing the nation. Democrats and Republicans are ruining America, no more titles.
You are a fuckin idiot! All the medias in America are controlled by hard-core conservatives. They do these kinds of things so that red state fucktards like you can say " oh it's liberal biased". Bullshit... Who do you think help see bush's war with Iraq? Bush and his buddies would have been hung to death for the shit they done if the media really wanted. So don't bullshit!
They are controlled by corporations comprised of both neoconservatives and neoliberals. The bias would be that of the particular corporation that happens to be running the said news outlet. As far as Bush being hung for crimes, every president in recent history is guilty of something case in point Clinton, Reagan, Nixon etc. If you were to start hanging politicians for crimes there wouldn't be a government.
There are only 5 corporations that own all of our news outlets. The bias is that of profit! If it's a choice of being governed by criminals or no government I'd choose the latter. Power 2 the People!!
the next president & America will be cleaning up the costly blunders of the bush administration for a long time...so please get on the good foot and elect a creative republican this time around.
Personally, I feel that the debates being hosted and moderated by Corporate News Networks is a conflict of interests and should be removed as part of election reform... the news media should only REPORT on the debate... not host and moderate.
DUH. Both parties are sleazy. Although I do not want to point the finger, the republicans started it with Bill Clinton in the 90's so now the Democrats are just playing the same game. Just hope it will change when one gets elected.
everyday on fox news there are lies or racist, bigot comments. You can go to "we watch fox so you don't have to." and see lies after lies...but of course republicans live in glass houses..larry craig, mark foley, richard curtis, etc, etc...
Well, you're now insulting yourself since he's the one in charge of the most powerful nation on Earth and you are just some flunky cyber-warrior sitting at a keyboard.
wow...i guess since he's the worst president in American history...lowest rating 59 to 65 %...i rather have had a president with cum stain than a president with blood stain..
Mark Strauss was a CNN set up to make Ron Paul look un-electable. You want proof ? Check my video. Bombshell Proof ! I am not surprised the MSM (Main Street Media) isn't picking this story up, cuz they all do it.
I don't see anywhere there that says they are undecided on whether to vote repub or dem... Seems to me they're undecided on which dem candidate to vote for. So what if they're activists? They can still ask a question, can't they?
I would say that I'm going to boycott CNN, but I gave up on watching them years ago. Screw them and their biased horseshit, pretty soon they'll only be preaching to themselves.
you have no idea how pissed i am at CNN. they are fucking Ron Paul so bad. they seriously are peices of shit. they are so biased they twist the truth so much AHHH it pisses me off!
I completely agree with the person under me (MEofPRODUCTIONS). Sure these people are activists and thats clearly why they are at these debates, but why does that mean they are not undecided? I don't see the scandal here. Let me know if I missed something.
thats not what a plant is. this video is attempting to find scandal where there isn't. these are "UNDECIDED" voters and thats probably true. nobaody said they pick them up off the street
CNN has no credibility. What they did in this debate and last night's GOP debate proves that they have no objectivity. No one should consider them as a legitimate news source.
The typical person isn't always that sharp. Can you imagine some of the ignorant questions some of the regular people would ask? It could be pathetic and a waste of time. Just a thought.
Social Security?? Fuck, that shit is completely bankrupt right now! There won't be enough money for so called baby boomers, and certainly there won't be enough for the generation after that. People should concern themselves with saving enough for them. We hear of a slowing economy and assholes keep buying shit and putting it on their credit cards. Start saving or you're gonna be sucking dick when your 70 to pay your meds.
All of this staged crap needs to stop. It is a waste of the voter's time and a throwback to the staged 'town meeting' type of events of bush and cheney. Please view searchword wilburjr-thanks.
God forbid. Politicians actually answer a "random" question from a "random" person? LOL! Isn't it already known that Clinton doesn't like "random" questions?
USA has become usa. man, this is ur end, expect Fiji tobecome the world super power because all americans are so dumb. do u wanna stop these lies then stop talking, stand up and do something.
Holy shit, that is pretty indicting. Well done to whoever found that out. It would have been fine if they didn't keep insisting these were 'undecided voters'. Haha. Well done.
Yes CNN is corrupt just like Fox News is which Michelle Malkin works for. If this is really her or not i don't know, but don't tell me that every mainstream media outlet doesn't frame arguments to get the responses that they desire. Throw off your masters and accept a leader RP 08
Thanks for posting the video. The New Media is doing what the old dinosaur lamestream media will never do - which is to point out the total hypocrisy and fakery of the Dem debate. The point is Hillary did NOT DO WELL in the last debate. Obviously her people worked with CNN to be CERTAIN she made no mistakes this time. How? Planted ? and Planted people to ask ?. So clearly fake.
??? Whoever made this video is crazy. It's not a general debate - it's a DEMOCRATIC debate, and hence the "undecided" voters are DEMOCRATS who are undecided between the primary candidates. It doesn't matter who is an activist or not.
At a republican primary debate, all the "undecided" voters will be Republican, and I'm sure most of them will be "activists" too.
You are missing the point...These people were hand picked plants...CNN obviously wanted the public to believe that they were just run of the mill concerned undecided voters (the only thing they MAY have been undecided about was which one of these socialist they support).
Yes, it was a democRAT "debate"..a typical democRAT debate when CNN is involved(not one hard question from old WOLF)...it was a SHOW...and CNN was grossly dishonest in their presentation...but then, nothing new here.
They were undecided democrats - there's nothing dishonest about that.
Would you have a problem if all the undecided voters' questions at a Republican debate were from Republican activists who hadn't decided on which particular candidate they were going to vote for?
It's not a big deal, CNN did what they said they did. Pick your battles.
Just ONE example: Maria Luisa (also known as Maria L. Parra-Sandoval) is "an immigrant on a quest to becom a United States citizen" says a UNLV website. This "undecided voter" can't vote. And, she wanted to ask a question about nuclear waste, but CNN didn't like it...they gave her the "diamonds or pearls" question...yeah, no plants..just a FAIR debate.
You are missing the whole picture. The audience members were not plants, which is what Republican forum organizers do. No one had to sign a loyalty oath or present a Democratic voter registration to get in. The QUESTIONS were planted, by CNN producers, becuase they wanted to control the topics.
Maria Luisa (also known as Maria L. Parra-Sandoval) is a juinor at UNLV and is "an immigrant on a quest to become a United States citizen". This "undecided voter" can't vote. And CNN did not like her question about nuclear waste, and gave her the "diamonds or pearls" question. She now is complaining about the "frilly" question they forced her to ask...yeah..just an HONEST debate at CNN.
Did you happen to watch the Republican presidential debate? Funny how a lot of those questioners picked by CNN happened to be active Democratic supporters. What is CNN doing here?
There is nothing more racist than putting people into groups because of their race. Hillary is a racist of the worst kind! Ron Paul believes we are all individuals, and deserve individual liberties.
Ron Paul is our only hope to bring home the troops, prevent regulation of the internet, reduce over taxation of the middle class, and the poor, and small business owners. Everyone who works will benefit from Ron Paul!!!
guess what? we're going to be in Iraq for a very long time, remember Korea, we're stil there... Taxes are going up that's all there is to it, if they don't then a third world toilet country is going to owne the U.S. more than they already do. Also, they are all crooks and liars, (that's how they got there). You just have to pick the one that you think will screw you the least. But that's just my thoughts. thanks
I'm curious as to what Michelle thinks now that it has been explained to her that only the democratic party of Nevada was invited (but i'm sure others attended though). I don't even think Bill O. would try to spin this into a controversy. He knows that both sides ask questions that are favorable to their candidates. Michele wasn't doing anything the other side wouldn't, but that still doesn't make it right.
You clearly are a lost cause. Your stance against the Constitution suggests your willingness to comply and allow your government to control you and others without question.
Hillary wants Social America, which is Unconstitutional. Guiliani supports an Unconstitutional war, as well as several other Rep. candidates. McCain supports torture to an extent, Unconstitutional.
Trial lawyers plead cases to jury's, so they're used to convincing people of a point of view. Paul encourages the strength of freedom and liberty over government imposed security, and you call them the idiots?
Look, why do you consider all Democratic contenders the ol catchphrase from conservatives "liberal". This was tyhe Democratic Party and it would appear to me that these "activists" could very well be undecided like many of us are at this point be it Republican or Democratic. Most I am sure will be voting for a Democraatic nominee but still UNDECIDED!!!
A union chief is not undecided.They are the ones that sign at the bottom of the union voter leaflet.I assure you Mr. Khan is not undecided.If you couldn't tell from the Pakistani last name;you can check his company's web site.The reason I am dead set against this argument is because I am a Democrat.These partisan groups are not partisan to us, they just see us a the weak link in.
Not sure why you turned your hate on me. If your definition of winning an argument is beating your chest like a caveman then go for it. I see you like to post a lot on these topics browsing through this thread. Since I think you can teach an old dog new tricks consider this: True power is convincing people of why your ideas makes sense, not trying to belittle everyone. People that simply act like jerks are sidelined by society and their ideas die while human progress rolls on.
Your reply is nonsense. They were deciding between the DEMS!! The name calling really shows the intelligence of your argument. Oh and you should look up the word liberal as in liberal arts degree. Remember Giulianis phone calls? part of the theatricality of campaigning in this country.
It5lee, your comments are hateful. You are not representing conservative values or any decent american values at all. You are patroling this page and shouting down anyone who is in disagrement with you. You clam to represent the facts? Show them!
I think you are either not really conservative, or you just have way too much time and are trying to start arguements. Count how many comments you have made on just this video. You don't even try to back up your claims and you throw out the "dishonesty card" when we aren't even talking about anything related. Even conservatives know to back up their claims with facts, even if they have to make up their facts.
I have never seen someone make up their facts in this or any other forum. I have seen the use of rhetorical questions as a way of not answering to specifics, an example of this sort of rhetorical device is, "The Republicans started a war. Have you ever heard of a Democrat war?" The answer is yes and such a rhetorical question is quickly answered. On the other hand I have never seen all out made up facts. I don't know where you pulled that from.
Unlike previous anti-terror legislation, this bill specifically targets the civilian population of the United States and uses vague language to define homegrown terrorism. Amazingly, 404 of our elected representatives from both the Democrat and Republican parties voted in favor of this bill. There is little doubt that this bill is specifically targeting the growing patriot community that is demanding the restoration of the Constitution.
Unlike previous anti-terror legislation, this bill specifically targets the civilian population of the United States and uses vague language to define homegrown terrorism. Amazingly, 404 of our elected representatives from both the Democrat and Republican parties voted in favor of this bill. There is little doubt that this bill is specifically targeting the growing patriot community that is demanding the restoration of the Constitution.
The U.S. House of Representatives recently passed HR 1955 titled the Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007. This bill is one of the most blatant attacks against the Constitution yet and actually defines thought crimes as homegrown terrorism. If passed into law, it will also establish a commission and a Center of Excellence to study and defeat so called thought criminals. continued...
I was also puzzled when I watched the debate and I heard Barack Obama thank Judy for the great work she does on behalf of the culinary workers! I was like what the hell is he talking about but I guess now I know!
LOL, I don't have a problem with a bunch of democrat activist asking questions. However, it's completely misleading not to state that fact beforehand. This doesn't change my perception of CNN, they've already lowered themselves to Faux News status quite a while ago. Glen Beck was the Nail in the Coffin, he's the news equivalent of Jerry Springer.
My advice for all Repubs, or Democrats, don't decide based on CNN, Fox coverage. It's theater not reality being covered.
I am not quite sure what Michelles point is here. Is she trying to point out the theatrical nature of presidential campains? Then why only show the democratic nominees?? Remember Giulianis phone calls?
More than that...they were passsed-off to the public as just totally random undecided voters...typical Americans. Not as staunch Democrats and activists who may well have met with the people they're asking questions of.
I agree. See below to see how they misused the term "undecided voter," and why I say that arguing that they meant 'Undecided Democrats' is not a good enough explanation for me. In the end though this only ruins their reputation. It is not against the law; Just another, "Buyer Beware"
@whoostino
The plain fact, clearly exposed in the video, remains that CNN colluded with Dem'rat candidates to HIDE THE FACT that DEMOCRAT PARTY ACTIVISTS were the ones asking the questions; NOT merely "undecided voters"; NOT merely you average Dem'rat citizen; NOT merely a politically unconnected voter, as the viewers were led to believe.
That is a purposeful FRAUD and DECEPTION.
And you're not dumb enough to not know all this, so stop publicly debasing yourself in defense of Democrat scum.
TylerNull 6 months ago
@TylerNull
They were identified as "undecided Democrats". It is unimportant that a woman is identified as a culinary union member when she is asking a question about social security. Or that the chick who asked "diamonds or pearls" once interned for Harry Reid. That's a BS rule made up by you and Michelle Malkin.
You would not propose this crap for Tea Party activists (who are also just ordinary citizens). The only story here is that you don't like Democrats. Big whoop.
whoostino 6 months ago
@whoostino
If your mind wasn't so easily led, this would be glaringly obvious to you that the purpose of the deception is to control the questions.
There is no shortage of registered Democrats -- "undecided voters" -- who are NOT Democrat party activists, who would like the opportunity ask a REAL question, like why Obama believes we can be taxed into prosperity or borrow our way out of debt.
But don't let the exposed Democrat deception stop you from trying to defend it.
TylerNull 6 months ago
@TylerNull
"control the questions?" CNN's attempt to control questions had nothing to do with the affiliations of these people in their private life.
And there is no reason any undecided voter should be excluded from asking questions of candidates in primary debates. Unless there is a clear conflict of interest, there is no reason CNN needs to identify them as "activists". If they choose not to be identified as such its actually kind of invasive.
whoostino 6 months ago
@TylerNull
What makes you think this debate was open to the public? This was a November 2007 primary debate. At the beginning Blitzer says, “In the second part, we will hear directly from some of this group of about 100 undecided Nevada DEMOCRATS”
whoostino 6 months ago
@whoostino
You and Malkin actually bring conservatives down when you try to portray this as media bias. The only controversy was when CNN handed the “diamonds & pearls” question to the one girl, who had a tougher question to ask. That was for their own sensationalist purposes, not because Clinton couldn’t handle a question on nuclear policy.
whoostino 6 months ago
@TylerNull
“However, they are Democrat party activists, and that salient point was hidden from the public."
If it was such a big secret, why did Obama give a shoutout from the stage to the culinary worker lady?? That you read conspiracy stuff into this is insane. Activists don't need to hide their agenda in a primary debate. Quite the opposite. Would Tea Party activists hide theirs in a GOP debate? It defeats their purpose! Malkin just thinks this is all secret because she's a lousy reporter.
whoostino 6 months ago
@TylerNull
Why would the speakers use their real names if this was a conspiracy? Why would their organizations send top level officials instead of 20 year-old interns to ask a memorized question? Seriously man, apply some critical thinking.
whoostino 6 months ago
@whoostino
Your 5 post novella fails to hide the exposed fraud.
Try blathering for 10 posts next time.
TylerNull 6 months ago
@TylerNull
At least I'm writing on a page no one is using anymore. You seem to prefer ejaculating off-topic novellas in forums where you're sure to be ignored by 99% of the readers.
whoostino 6 months ago
The funniest thing Iv'e ever seen on cnn is there latest commercial showing a elephant with the word FOX painted on the side and then a donkey with the letters msnbc painted on the sideof it, the above caption reads "cnn we don't take sides" HELLO!!. Ok for all the dead people that have just woken up from a 15 year nap a hot news flash, FOX news props the Republicans and all other news organizations prop liberal democrats.
greptor 1 year ago
Democrats, Deception & Fraud -- Life Partners
TylerNull 2 years ago 10
y this video reminds me of my videos!!1 t
5353141 3 years ago
Right On the money Video!
apks2004 3 years ago
This would be an intriguing, if not damning, question in the general debate. But this is an early Democratic Party debate—look at the large field of candiates. Both parties bases are by definition activist: Democrats for workers, minorities, and the environment; Republicans for corporations, arms dealers, and theocrats. It's no surprise that the most prepared candidates would know these activists, just as it is no surprise that CNN isn't going to ask a not-camera-ready person a question.
paddlerpoet 3 years ago
This would be an intriguing, if not damning, question in the general debate. But this is an early Democratic Party debate—look at the large field of candiates. Both parties' bases are by definition activist: Democrats for workers, minorities, and the environment; Republicans for corporations, arms dealers, and theocrats. It's no surprise that the most prepared candidates would know these activists, just as it is no surprise that CNN isn't going to ask a not-camera-ready person a question.
paddlerpoet 3 years ago
That's what Communists do, they infiltrate from the inside and get up front, posing as a majority viewpoint. Unfortunately [for them] this tactic is only useful when the real majority isn't as alert as the enemy is. Unfortunately, no one is as alert as a true Communist since they feel - and do not think.
AZTLANBUSTERS 3 years ago
Jesus fucking christ, you don't even know what a communist is!
RickJS 3 years ago
Ok, why don't you type "naked communist" into google, click link titled "excerpts" and educate us, komrad. I'll wait.
AZTLANBUSTERS 3 years ago
"More conservative" should read "less conservative"
heatsketch 3 years ago
Lou Dobbs, who the second guy mentioned, is the only trustworthy member of CNN (actually Glenn Beck too, but he is Headline News which is less conservative)
heatsketch 3 years ago
This isn't suprising at all. CNN is in the tank, and some of it's correspondants, susan malvo, dana bash, gloria borger, and so many others, are so in the tank it's unbelievable. and then they turn around and claim not to be
heatsketch 3 years ago
CNN sucks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
lookout88 3 years ago
What is a "Supreme Court Justice for Education"? (question at 2:40)
mainsqueeze1977 3 years ago
this is how its been throughout the history of politics... people are knowing now because of more media... dont mess with it.
2Luke 3 years ago
While Im a republican I dont see a problem with the undecided voters. This video is from a DEMOCRATIC primary so I only assume that those are undecided DEMOCRATIC voters. Why would they take questions form republicans at a DEMOCRATIC primary?
I frequent CNN all the time and do think they have a very liberal bias and are pushing a liberal agenda, but I dont see what CNN did wrong in this video.
Yereviltwin2 2 years ago
I agree w/ Yereviltwin2
louise12345 1 year ago
Paul vs. Clinton.
Discovery in the case is expected to begin in May, 2008 as it proceeds to trial.
The discovery will expose an ongoing cover-up of the campaign finance crimes and the obstructions of justice directed by Hillary Clinton with the help of Bill Clinton and former DNC Chair Ed Rendell. The cover-up rivals Watergate in its corruption of each branch of government and the media.
campaign finance boy how come this is not on the air waves
ikeproc 3 years ago
@ikeproc
LOL
whoostino 6 months ago
POLITICIANS are the crib of the economic engine and are responsible for all rises in inflation all reforms and vetos and revolts and societal poverty! presidents are the ones responsible negating property rights through legalised extortion such as rising taxes rising home costs (when wallstreet can) all forms of cost inflation and rising costs is politicaly engineered! dont be swayed by lies
and bullshit on CNN trying to render innocent politics from the societal collapsing effects it creates
lucidgenius88 3 years ago
The news on CNN is so slanted in favor of Obama that it is CORRUPT!!! If Obama farts, they are there to say that it smells like roses.
StopObamaNow 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DON'T READ THIS I'M SOOOO SORRY EVRY1 If you do not copy and paste this onto 10 videos your mom will die in 4 hours
MoochieMinks 3 years ago
Sadly, Hillary is not very imaginative nor brilliant so to plant questions gives her control over the outcome. As a President she would be faced with situations where there would be no control and she must act instantly without planted questions. It appears that she is not up to the challenge.
o0sunsi0o 3 years ago
go get ur self a life dick chney bitch..
the time of bush admin is finihsed now..
so u r scared...
Undiceded voter mean,they r not registerd voters.
coolguyintheblue 3 years ago
It is bad enough we have phony candidates. They'll alway be. But do we really need fake debates too?
outkid 3 years ago
gay.
hardassteel 4 years ago
If only all the immigrants to US are like Michelle Malkin standing up against immigrants, we can stop pretty much all kinds of immigration to this country. Perhaps some of Michelle folks from Philipines can be given some backdoor entry.
ssachidanandam 4 years ago
Yea its so sick how CNN= Politics. More like CNN= Thought control. The election again is going to be another brilliant shakespere act. Two puppets face off for the same master. Makes me puke Arnold is a bastard.
WeAre1withtheUnivers 4 years ago
LOL , BUSTED !
andrebugz 4 years ago
Very good video! You know, all the candidates seem to be that way. All the ones I've seen are completely rhetoric -- all talk and no do. Ron Paul is the only one (with a chance) whose "message" matches his voting record, so I've decided to go for him.
apatriotacts 4 years ago
God what I would give to get some of these snot-nosed CNN flunkies to come down from their ivory towers, and get in front of a camera where THEY would have to answer questions!
joesmoe71 4 years ago
watch wat u say on youtube, i said somethin bout the pres and helicopters started hovering over my house...wat ever happend to freedom of speech??? cant believe this shit
youalready345 4 years ago
Imagine if Fox News did something like this, it would be all over the news and people on the internet would go crazy.
sdfsadfsdfasfdsb45w3 4 years ago 2
lol this is actually somewhat anal .. they were all people that represent a mass group of americans. Not undecided, that term was wolfs mistake and bad choice of words.... There was no attempt to hide who they were just a questionable term Undecided Voters from wolf..
devvon101 4 years ago
Good video...however Michelle Malkin, you're guilty of spinning yourself. Ron Paul appeared on Alex Jones and you spun him into a paranoid delusional. You should be ashamed, you make money from the lie machine that is destroying this country. You are exactly what you claim to despise.
lightleague 4 years ago
Michelle Malkin, the minority's Philippino!
imranchoothya 4 years ago
Michelle Malkin, the minority's Philippino!
She shows Philippino traits that ooze out from her.
imranchoothya 4 years ago
Hillary is the most disliked person in Pakistan.
She cannot make a good President. She commits silly errors but thinks she is too clever.
imranchoothya 4 years ago
The Democrats are so desperate!
daimajinbob 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
PLEASE!! GOOGLE!!!
"Freedom to fascism" watch
video
to find the truth
ron paul 2008
fox news has excluded him from debate , fight the corprate media
boxybrown44 4 years ago
Dennis Kucinich 2008!! Watch "Don't Be A Chicken" YouTube animation, read about HR 676 plan and get your representatives to vote YES for it!!
odetomy 4 years ago
10 years ago the leftist USA media was fooling everyone. I do not understand why anyone could still be a democrat now that there is so much information out there.
triton609 4 years ago 2
Do you want to know why Ron Paul is not #1 in the polls?
/watch?v=VSYiUAaBd1U
beingisbecoming4 4 years ago
The media won't let him be
daimajinbob 4 years ago
Dem or Rep mainly is just a circus of puppets. Ron Paul bless his soul could be one of the only honest men left in politics.
WeAre1withtheUnivers 4 years ago
CNN and politics just don't go together. In America the Father would be sick at this enterprise.
WeAre1withtheUnivers 4 years ago
In a nutshell this person has summed up the idiocy of leftist dogma.
Here are the problems with what you said:
1) who decides what speech is leftist or rightist that needs balancing?
2) what happens to broadcasting companies like air america or america right that have business models specifically catering to those people who want to hear ONLY left or right radio talk show hosts?
I'm done here bc you're most likely to ignore me and keep doing what your TV tells you to.
whiterappershow 4 years ago
Republicans always bash the media for having a liberal bias. They always cry a river because they feel theyre SO oppressed by the MSDBLM(main stream drive-by liberal media) for short. If they feel so oppressed why dont they want politicans to sign the equal time ammendment which would regulate to ensure equal time? If regulating the free market is not the answer than whats the solution? I here alot of crying, but not alot of solutions.
khsmith11 4 years ago
Equal time means oppression and silence. It does not really mean equal time. Plus, if you read the legislation proposed, including the past Fairness Doctrine, you'll see that broadcast media is exempt. We need less regulation, not more. And we need to be able to prosecute liars when they endanger peoples lives or welbeing for a sensational story that turns out to be made up. As for journalists, I just want to see them get what is coming to them.
EvilMongrelMonkey 4 years ago
Wolf Blitzer, a self hating jew
TravisB19 4 years ago 2
Fox is crap! I don't watch the news at all, because nbc, cnn, are all that way, but Fox is not journalism period.
FromBoomTown 4 years ago
Thank you Michelle Malkin.
RenShiWu 4 years ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
angl237 4 years ago
People, after 7 years of pre-screened audiences throwing softballs to our moron president, you're upset because people who are both voters and apparently undecided (although they're undoubtedly not trending Republican) are participating in a debate? Why is this even worth commenting on? The Bushies have trashed our legal system, political institutions, Treasury, and economy so thoroughly, Republicans deserve to be booed out of office.
rpeck1111 4 years ago
rpeck you are a deranged moron. Spew your Bush derangement syndrome all you want, but I can't believe anyone with 2 brain cells would condone outright manipulation of our elective process by a major media outlet hand in hand with one of the political parties... If it's ok for CNN and the Dems to pull these stunts, then where does it end? Why bother with elections at all? You are truly deranged.
sjbing65 4 years ago
Can you believe this? People that are committed to various causes and/or active in politics actually stepping forward to ask questions of politicians vying for the White House?! The nerve of them! Shame on CNN for broadcasting legitimate speech about issues and our political process! Wait, what?
rpeck1111 4 years ago
CNN=Commie News Network
tlewis7777 4 years ago 2
CNN REP DEBATE 11-28-07: Did you see/hear that ignorant fool, Jeff Toobin, the CNN "analyst" after the debate. He had no idea about the NAU or SPP. He said that the NAU/SPP "Was a figment of Ron Paul's imagination" . Video makers should have a field day with this!!!!
Google: CFR / NAU & 2008 Presidential Candidates
YTsearch - CNN REP DEBATE 11-28-07
afactorfiction 4 years ago
HEY...THIS SUZANNE HOST CHICK USED TO DATE...
JEAN MICHEAL BASQUIAT (THE famous painter & HEROIN ADDICT)who died of heroin overdose.
NEBRASKANS4RONPAUL 4 years ago
Someone should ship Anderson Cooper to CAMP GITMO for enhanced JOURNALISM TRAINING for
PLANTING ALL THE democratic operatives/moles at a REPUBLICAN DEBATE sponsored by the CNN NEWS CIRCUS.
NEBRASKANS4RONPAUL 4 years ago
The Democrats sold out the working middle class. Both parties gave us NAFTA, WTO. Both trying to give us North American Union (NAU) CFR agenda. Google: CFR/NAU YTsearch - David Rockefeller Fears Ron Paul. Ron Paul is ANTI-CFR. Top Tier are all CFR. Especially Hillary and Guiliani. Follow the Money
afactorfiction 4 years ago
Malkin, during commerical breaks the candidates go out to meet people and sometimes they talk to them. They also go through front, back, side of the debate hall. Occassionally they may have people, as GOP would. They sit in audience with the same concerns most Americans face. Get over yourself Malkin, you and neo-cons are dividing the nation. Democrats and Republicans are ruining America, no more titles.
LILVOKA 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Save the date
Guess what's coming? We are going to have a huge rally for Mike!
When: December 10th, 2007
Where: Pan Pacific Park, 7600 Beverly Blvd. Los Angeles, California
Time: 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
The Senator: He will be there to speak in person! 3:30 pm!
There will be food and entertainment!
Bring signs in support of Senator Gravel!
It doesn't matter where you live. Come Celebrate! Pass the word! Power to the People
angl237 4 years ago
This is disheartening to be sure. CNN continues to reach new lows and if anything, manufacture news and information to sell their product.
cutis1000 4 years ago
Very good video I like the way you researche it it is impressive I hope you get people watching your video 5* thanks
darsal123 4 years ago
I am no fan of FOX, but CNN makes them look like God. CNN needs to realize that we KNOW they are lying to us.
ProgressiveViewer 4 years ago
I have to agree. I hate CNN and Fox but this was an all time low.
overmind25 4 years ago
Bluecollarpolitico,
You are a fuckin idiot! All the medias in America are controlled by hard-core conservatives. They do these kinds of things so that red state fucktards like you can say " oh it's liberal biased". Bullshit... Who do you think help see bush's war with Iraq? Bush and his buddies would have been hung to death for the shit they done if the media really wanted. So don't bullshit!
Alakiri08 4 years ago
They are controlled by corporations comprised of both neoconservatives and neoliberals. The bias would be that of the particular corporation that happens to be running the said news outlet. As far as Bush being hung for crimes, every president in recent history is guilty of something case in point Clinton, Reagan, Nixon etc. If you were to start hanging politicians for crimes there wouldn't be a government.
trs45676 4 years ago
There are only 5 corporations that own all of our news outlets. The bias is that of profit! If it's a choice of being governed by criminals or no government I'd choose the latter. Power 2 the People!!
notyouneek 4 years ago
It must be very interesting to live in a world so befuddled by beliefs that have no basis in reality.
randomjsa 4 years ago
WOW! The Dem candidates were given softball questions by their own plants in the audience. I AM SO SURPRISED BY THIS!
NOT!
Typical DemocRat move in concert with their friends in the media. In this case, it was CNN. But it could have easily been CBS, MSNBC, ABC, or NBC.
My only question: Is there anybody left who thinks these "news" organizations are unbiased? If so, please explain this video.
BlueCollarPolitico 4 years ago
the next president & America will be cleaning up the costly blunders of the bush administration for a long time...so please get on the good foot and elect a creative republican this time around.
wiggus13 4 years ago
Personally, I feel that the debates being hosted and moderated by Corporate News Networks is a conflict of interests and should be removed as part of election reform... the news media should only REPORT on the debate... not host and moderate.
cormex55 4 years ago 2
Have now blocked CNN & CNN Headline news.
5158307 4 years ago
DUH. Both parties are sleazy. Although I do not want to point the finger, the republicans started it with Bill Clinton in the 90's so now the Democrats are just playing the same game. Just hope it will change when one gets elected.
Kildragoth 4 years ago
everyday on fox news there are lies or racist, bigot comments. You can go to "we watch fox so you don't have to." and see lies after lies...but of course republicans live in glass houses..larry craig, mark foley, richard curtis, etc, etc...
WDWHolidays 4 years ago
Republicans don't stand behind people like those you mentioned.
Democrats promote them to higher offices.
liberallosers 4 years ago
Nothings higher than the monkey in the white house..
WDWHolidays 4 years ago
Well, you're now insulting yourself since he's the one in charge of the most powerful nation on Earth and you are just some flunky cyber-warrior sitting at a keyboard.
liberallosers 4 years ago
wow...i guess since he's the worst president in American history...lowest rating 59 to 65 %...i rather have had a president with cum stain than a president with blood stain..
WDWHolidays 4 years ago
Well you just continue to make a fool of yourself don't you?
I sense a lack of intelligence on your part.
liberallosers 4 years ago
Mark Strauss was a CNN set up to make Ron Paul look un-electable. You want proof ? Check my video. Bombshell Proof ! I am not surprised the MSM (Main Street Media) isn't picking this story up, cuz they all do it.
fuzzybekool 4 years ago
Ron Paul IS unelectable in case you haven't noticed that yet.
liberallosers 4 years ago
CNN = Clinton News Network
Planting at Least 7 Dems in the Republican Debate.
DO NOT TRUST CNN!
hellotommy 4 years ago
The Democrats were too scared to participate in the FOX debates...they might have had to answer tough questions!!
Everything about them is phony!
fresian2007 4 years ago 2
I don't see anywhere there that says they are undecided on whether to vote repub or dem... Seems to me they're undecided on which dem candidate to vote for. So what if they're activists? They can still ask a question, can't they?
mjmr89 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Can you back that up so everyone can see?
tomeo13 4 years ago
I would say that I'm going to boycott CNN, but I gave up on watching them years ago. Screw them and their biased horseshit, pretty soon they'll only be preaching to themselves.
joesmoe71 4 years ago
you have no idea how pissed i am at CNN. they are fucking Ron Paul so bad. they seriously are peices of shit. they are so biased they twist the truth so much AHHH it pisses me off!
edguy69 4 years ago
I completely agree with the person under me (MEofPRODUCTIONS). Sure these people are activists and thats clearly why they are at these debates, but why does that mean they are not undecided? I don't see the scandal here. Let me know if I missed something.
djw11s 4 years ago
all they clam is that they are Undecided... of course they are activist..don't make this an issue, thats stupid
MEoPRODUCTIONS 4 years ago
thats not what a plant is. this video is attempting to find scandal where there isn't. these are "UNDECIDED" voters and thats probably true. nobaody said they pick them up off the street
MEoPRODUCTIONS 4 years ago
CNN has no credibility. What they did in this debate and last night's GOP debate proves that they have no objectivity. No one should consider them as a legitimate news source.
jackson295 4 years ago
my god, why can't videos like this be shown on TV? fantastic job
jimmyfellatio 4 years ago
I vote democrat all the time. Vote dem...!!
jerrydoubleu 4 years ago
Pravda was more honest during Soviet times.
Omnious24 4 years ago
The typical person isn't always that sharp. Can you imagine some of the ignorant questions some of the regular people would ask? It could be pathetic and a waste of time. Just a thought.
blaqcat2nv 4 years ago
Social Security?? Fuck, that shit is completely bankrupt right now! There won't be enough money for so called baby boomers, and certainly there won't be enough for the generation after that. People should concern themselves with saving enough for them. We hear of a slowing economy and assholes keep buying shit and putting it on their credit cards. Start saving or you're gonna be sucking dick when your 70 to pay your meds.
dxb002 4 years ago
CNN has really stepped in it. They just can't resist!
indiegibraltar 4 years ago
All of this staged crap needs to stop. It is a waste of the voter's time and a throwback to the staged 'town meeting' type of events of bush and cheney. Please view searchword wilburjr-thanks.
wilburjr 4 years ago
God forbid. Politicians actually answer a "random" question from a "random" person? LOL! Isn't it already known that Clinton doesn't like "random" questions?
LordBLB 4 years ago
Blah, blah, blah, spam, spam, spam.
mahowel 4 years ago
USA has become usa. man, this is ur end, expect Fiji tobecome the world super power because all americans are so dumb. do u wanna stop these lies then stop talking, stand up and do something.
KabweDada 4 years ago
From a Canadian idiot that is posting on an American website, on the American invented internet, using a computer with a processor made in America.
liberallosers 4 years ago
nice
wobbels74 4 years ago
Holy shit, that is pretty indicting. Well done to whoever found that out. It would have been fine if they didn't keep insisting these were 'undecided voters'. Haha. Well done.
countertreason 4 years ago
Yes CNN is corrupt just like Fox News is which Michelle Malkin works for. If this is really her or not i don't know, but don't tell me that every mainstream media outlet doesn't frame arguments to get the responses that they desire. Throw off your masters and accept a leader RP 08
AspiretoShred 4 years ago
*** RonPaulsTeaParty[dot]com *** to take part in history on December 16th!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Benaiahh 4 years ago
Is he going to kill himself on live tv? We can only hope.
mahowel 4 years ago
WOW! good video!!! that is total proof our media is completely corrupt as fuck!!
sentencing 4 years ago 2
Fake people = fake elections!!!
The major candidate are all fake, ignorant & lairs!!!!
Vote for the truth, for the empowerment of the people.
The only candidate, eliminated from the debates, because speaking the truth.
MIKE GRAVEL, A PROVEN LEADER!!!!
varsej 4 years ago
Pretty Hilarious watching Hilary I must say.....even more funny watching a Democrat debate lol
rjl2000 4 years ago
Thanks for posting the video. The New Media is doing what the old dinosaur lamestream media will never do - which is to point out the total hypocrisy and fakery of the Dem debate. The point is Hillary did NOT DO WELL in the last debate. Obviously her people worked with CNN to be CERTAIN she made no mistakes this time. How? Planted ? and Planted people to ask ?. So clearly fake.
UNC71 4 years ago 2
NO, they're not allowed to be part of an activist group, labor union, or be politically involved at all. That's correct.
batesm 4 years ago
LOL where do you get your ideas from!?!???
lhooq21 4 years ago
politically involved
batesm 4 years ago
Want to stop the war
and stop the shit that spews out Hillary's mouth
Vote Gravel and let's not hear from her again!
drone15 4 years ago
??? Whoever made this video is crazy. It's not a general debate - it's a DEMOCRATIC debate, and hence the "undecided" voters are DEMOCRATS who are undecided between the primary candidates. It doesn't matter who is an activist or not.
At a republican primary debate, all the "undecided" voters will be Republican, and I'm sure most of them will be "activists" too.
mraira 4 years ago
Engage your brain.
liberallosers 4 years ago
You are missing the point...These people were hand picked plants...CNN obviously wanted the public to believe that they were just run of the mill concerned undecided voters (the only thing they MAY have been undecided about was which one of these socialist they support).
Yes, it was a democRAT "debate"..a typical democRAT debate when CNN is involved(not one hard question from old WOLF)...it was a SHOW...and CNN was grossly dishonest in their presentation...but then, nothing new here.
mobydylan 4 years ago
They were undecided democrats - there's nothing dishonest about that.
Would you have a problem if all the undecided voters' questions at a Republican debate were from Republican activists who hadn't decided on which particular candidate they were going to vote for?
It's not a big deal, CNN did what they said they did. Pick your battles.
mraira 4 years ago
Just ONE example: Maria Luisa (also known as Maria L. Parra-Sandoval) is "an immigrant on a quest to becom a United States citizen" says a UNLV website. This "undecided voter" can't vote. And, she wanted to ask a question about nuclear waste, but CNN didn't like it...they gave her the "diamonds or pearls" question...yeah, no plants..just a FAIR debate.
mobydylan 4 years ago
Why would we want a bunch of Democrats asking Democrats softball questions?
kgj08 4 years ago
You are missing the whole picture. The audience members were not plants, which is what Republican forum organizers do. No one had to sign a loyalty oath or present a Democratic voter registration to get in. The QUESTIONS were planted, by CNN producers, becuase they wanted to control the topics.
getplaning 4 years ago
Maria Luisa (also known as Maria L. Parra-Sandoval) is a juinor at UNLV and is "an immigrant on a quest to become a United States citizen". This "undecided voter" can't vote. And CNN did not like her question about nuclear waste, and gave her the "diamonds or pearls" question. She now is complaining about the "frilly" question they forced her to ask...yeah..just an HONEST debate at CNN.
mobydylan 4 years ago
So...why didn't CNN get REPUBLICAN operatives to ask them tough questions like they did to the Republicans with Democratic operatives?
liberallosers 4 years ago
It's Malkin trying to spin controversy.
lhooq21 4 years ago
UPDATE: The CNN/YouTube "debate":
Gay Military "undecided voter" is a PAID Hillary Clinton staffer.
Concerned mom LeeAnn Anderson is a John Ewards union activist.
Concern Log Cabin Republican Davie Cercone is an Obama supporter.
Concerned "undecided young voter "Journey" is a John Edward supporter.
CNN is a SHAM and propaganda arm of the DNC.
mobydylan 4 years ago 2
My last posting about 4 plants was concerning the GOP debate where CNN had democrat plants asking the questions.
mobydylan 4 years ago 2
Did you happen to watch the Republican presidential debate? Funny how a lot of those questioners picked by CNN happened to be active Democratic supporters. What is CNN doing here?
tomeo13 4 years ago
This is VERY scary. Joseph Goebbels couldn't have put on a better show.
josh10002 4 years ago 2
excellent - media malpractice!
custerdivision 4 years ago
There is nothing more racist than putting people into groups because of their race. Hillary is a racist of the worst kind! Ron Paul believes we are all individuals, and deserve individual liberties.
Ron Paul is our only hope to bring home the troops, prevent regulation of the internet, reduce over taxation of the middle class, and the poor, and small business owners. Everyone who works will benefit from Ron Paul!!!
LetFreedomRlng 4 years ago
guess what? we're going to be in Iraq for a very long time, remember Korea, we're stil there... Taxes are going up that's all there is to it, if they don't then a third world toilet country is going to owne the U.S. more than they already do. Also, they are all crooks and liars, (that's how they got there). You just have to pick the one that you think will screw you the least. But that's just my thoughts. thanks
up2nothing 4 years ago
Is that why Ron Paul does articles in White Supremecist magazines and accepts their donations?
liberallosers 4 years ago
Wouldn't expect anything less from the CLINTON NEWS NETWORK!!!!
bbv4 4 years ago 4
Amazing!
This is what Americans need to know.
Wake up, your democracy is gradually subverted more and more....
WAKE UP
thawkth 4 years ago 7
I'm curious as to what Michelle thinks now that it has been explained to her that only the democratic party of Nevada was invited (but i'm sure others attended though). I don't even think Bill O. would try to spin this into a controversy. He knows that both sides ask questions that are favorable to their candidates. Michele wasn't doing anything the other side wouldn't, but that still doesn't make it right.
tiger32123 4 years ago
wow obama is such a fake
Zergosss 4 years ago 5
Keep up the great work Michelle!
StuckMic 4 years ago
Ron Paul is a racist.
liberallosers 4 years ago
You clearly are a lost cause. Your stance against the Constitution suggests your willingness to comply and allow your government to control you and others without question.
Baowulf00 4 years ago
Hillary wants Social America, which is Unconstitutional. Guiliani supports an Unconstitutional war, as well as several other Rep. candidates. McCain supports torture to an extent, Unconstitutional.
Trial lawyers plead cases to jury's, so they're used to convincing people of a point of view. Paul encourages the strength of freedom and liberty over government imposed security, and you call them the idiots?
Baowulf00 4 years ago
Look, why do you consider all Democratic contenders the ol catchphrase from conservatives "liberal". This was tyhe Democratic Party and it would appear to me that these "activists" could very well be undecided like many of us are at this point be it Republican or Democratic. Most I am sure will be voting for a Democraatic nominee but still UNDECIDED!!!
gbayoo 4 years ago
A union chief is not undecided.They are the ones that sign at the bottom of the union voter leaflet.I assure you Mr. Khan is not undecided.If you couldn't tell from the Pakistani last name;you can check his company's web site.The reason I am dead set against this argument is because I am a Democrat.These partisan groups are not partisan to us, they just see us a the weak link in.
Fun247247 4 years ago
Not sure why you turned your hate on me. If your definition of winning an argument is beating your chest like a caveman then go for it. I see you like to post a lot on these topics browsing through this thread. Since I think you can teach an old dog new tricks consider this: True power is convincing people of why your ideas makes sense, not trying to belittle everyone. People that simply act like jerks are sidelined by society and their ideas die while human progress rolls on.
BenGerhold 4 years ago
Why is it that half the comments are from It5lee? Is someone on the payroll?
BenGerh 4 years ago 2
Your reply is nonsense. They were deciding between the DEMS!! The name calling really shows the intelligence of your argument. Oh and you should look up the word liberal as in liberal arts degree. Remember Giulianis phone calls? part of the theatricality of campaigning in this country.
lhooq21 4 years ago
It5lee, your comments are hateful. You are not representing conservative values or any decent american values at all. You are patroling this page and shouting down anyone who is in disagrement with you. You clam to represent the facts? Show them!
lhooq21 4 years ago
Undecided as to which Democratic candidate they're voting for... duh.
stevenstsang 4 years ago
I think you are either not really conservative, or you just have way too much time and are trying to start arguements. Count how many comments you have made on just this video. You don't even try to back up your claims and you throw out the "dishonesty card" when we aren't even talking about anything related. Even conservatives know to back up their claims with facts, even if they have to make up their facts.
tiger32123 4 years ago
I have never seen someone make up their facts in this or any other forum. I have seen the use of rhetorical questions as a way of not answering to specifics, an example of this sort of rhetorical device is, "The Republicans started a war. Have you ever heard of a Democrat war?" The answer is yes and such a rhetorical question is quickly answered. On the other hand I have never seen all out made up facts. I don't know where you pulled that from.
Fun247247 4 years ago
Thanks for exposing the fakes
liberallosers 4 years ago
continued...
Unlike previous anti-terror legislation, this bill specifically targets the civilian population of the United States and uses vague language to define homegrown terrorism. Amazingly, 404 of our elected representatives from both the Democrat and Republican parties voted in favor of this bill. There is little doubt that this bill is specifically targeting the growing patriot community that is demanding the restoration of the Constitution.
callumonit 4 years ago
continued
Unlike previous anti-terror legislation, this bill specifically targets the civilian population of the United States and uses vague language to define homegrown terrorism. Amazingly, 404 of our elected representatives from both the Democrat and Republican parties voted in favor of this bill. There is little doubt that this bill is specifically targeting the growing patriot community that is demanding the restoration of the Constitution.
callumonit 4 years ago
The U.S. House of Representatives recently passed HR 1955 titled the Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007. This bill is one of the most blatant attacks against the Constitution yet and actually defines thought crimes as homegrown terrorism. If passed into law, it will also establish a commission and a Center of Excellence to study and defeat so called thought criminals. continued...
callumonit 4 years ago
I was also puzzled when I watched the debate and I heard Barack Obama thank Judy for the great work she does on behalf of the culinary workers! I was like what the hell is he talking about but I guess now I know!
MSH786 4 years ago 2
LOL, I don't have a problem with a bunch of democrat activist asking questions. However, it's completely misleading not to state that fact beforehand. This doesn't change my perception of CNN, they've already lowered themselves to Faux News status quite a while ago. Glen Beck was the Nail in the Coffin, he's the news equivalent of Jerry Springer.
My advice for all Repubs, or Democrats, don't decide based on CNN, Fox coverage. It's theater not reality being covered.
SoGladUCame 4 years ago
Well DUH don't trust the media.
Fox news may suck, but CNN is a farce itself
gfreeman556 4 years ago
Where is the dishonesty?
lhooq21 4 years ago
I am not quite sure what Michelles point is here. Is she trying to point out the theatrical nature of presidential campains? Then why only show the democratic nominees?? Remember Giulianis phone calls?
lhooq21 4 years ago
Just a misuse of the term "undecided voter"
Fun247247 4 years ago 2
More than that...they were passsed-off to the public as just totally random undecided voters...typical Americans. Not as staunch Democrats and activists who may well have met with the people they're asking questions of.
liberallosers 4 years ago
I agree. See below to see how they misused the term "undecided voter," and why I say that arguing that they meant 'Undecided Democrats' is not a good enough explanation for me. In the end though this only ruins their reputation. It is not against the law; Just another, "Buyer Beware"
Fun247247 4 years ago