meh. Beatles are good, but this is a different arrangement. i personally like the Beatles version better (probably because i heard it first), but i'm not hating on this one. Hollies are good too. :)
Top comments say the Beatles did this better? Did they even listen to the Hollies version or read the original sheet music? Beatles way too slow, Hollies almost a little too fast but kept the feel of the song as Herp Alpert did in the instrumental. I played this song growning up and the sheet music directs you to play slow in the intro then speed way up for the main body and slow where Herp slows of the which the Beatles did not do. Hollies way better!
very enjoyable, maybe a bit caberetish, but proffesional prefer their album version this is a better version than Beatles, and the Hollies ie Tony Hicks better guitarist than George Harrison and Bobby Elliot better drummer than Ringo, and Allan superior singer to bothe John and Paul.
Gran versión de "The Hollies" muy interesante y buenos arreglos. Sin duda muy diferente a la de "The Beatles" ambas versiones son muy buenas . Saludos desde México..
Strange.. in my whole life i never knew this song had words..50 some odd years and I never knew..I thought it was instrumental.. Welcome me out from under my rock i guess..
much better is the version of the singer Lenny Welch, who was the first and the pioneer in singing this song, so you have to give credit to him ... The Beatles did it better but they did not made up ....ok? The Hollies simply gave a more lively and cheerful version of the song, in general I like all 3 versions of Lenny Welch, of The Beatles and The Hollies, D
This was one of those songs that many bands did during the sixties. The album version is group thing and not a live performance with a big band backing. I prefer the more rock/ballad version off the album
Good morning, do you like sixties? Listen and pod cast my program " great sound of 60' s " on the site plumfm. Greeting and made blooper in rock and roll.
Salut, vous aimez les sixties ? Ecoutez et podcatez mon émission "le super son des sixties" sur plum fm. Salut et faites gaffe au rock'n roll.
The Beatles didn't write it but they made it popular when they released their cover of it on their first album, Please Please Me (1963). It was written originally for Broadway I think
Wow, this is a great version of Taste of Honey. Most of the time when a rock band plays a swing tune the drummer can't handle it. Bobby Elliot sounds awesome. His fills are great. I remember Bon Jovi tried to do a swing version of one of their hits on MTV or VH1. It was terrible. Didn't swing at all.
they have been made wonderful musci and i do agree that they have been unterrated consequentelly.... but i always loved them. this has nothing to do that i am a strong beatles fan... you can love one opera and others too.... music has so much faces - this is one.... and even one of the best sides....... my opinion
@bdhcarbon no .. they changed the original lines a bit but there is nothing extra. i know it beacause i am learning actually the original version ....
no one mentions that this version appears to actually be a live version. If you're going to draw parallels between the beatles and these guys, put this up against any live Beatles recording and I think you will have your answer!!! Seriously.
Notice how comments such as "The Beatles version of Taste of Honey is my favorite and leave it on shelf" Personal perspectives have NOTHING to do with the excellence that this version of TOH represents. At this LEVEL a musical awareness a true afficiando realizes that there is no good or bad. The Musical excellence the Hollies display for this era is impossible to refute. If you do refute then raise your standards!!! A the time of this recording these guy's were barely 20 years old. HELLO!!!
Thank you! Thank you!Thank you! While the Beatles are one of my favorite groups, you cannot brush off every other band. The Hollies have earned a right to be recognized for their musical contributions and not just shrugged off. While enjoyment of music is subjective at some level, raise the bar and examine the technical and historical perspectives of the piece being performed.
Thanks man, most people like the ones who comment here indulge in Kool-Aid, chips, beer and burgers consequently they conform to limited thinking and become cheerleaders for the obvious great artists unable and or unwilling to acknowledge other levels of musical excellence.. Thank god only the Beatles existed in the 60's man I would have been lost without them
The Beatle's cover of this song is my all time favorite ever, this is the first time I heard the Hollies do it, and I think it is very nice, so thanks for sharing, but I would leave it on the shelf.
@miccarlos Why don't you go say that about a Beatles video? Not hating on the Beatles but dude, I think they get enough praise without making random statements on other groups videos.
Amazing how differently one can render this. From the famous Beatles and Herp Alpert versions to Esther Ofarim. Each one excellent in its own way! Also interesting for me the rating in the comments. It's understandable that most people have favourite version. But to abuse someone with a different taste (of honey...) is absurd.
Greetings from the Palatinate, Germany to all Hollies fans and thanx for posting this really amazing rendition, KeatonsAnnex. :):):)
MY LATE MOTHER ,WORKED WITH HOLLIES GUITARIST TONY HICKS, MOTHER WHO WAS A COTTON WEAVER IN THE 1950s IN NELSON LANCASHIRE UK . A REALLY NICE FAMILY. AND A WONDERFUL GROUP.
This is not a Beatles song. At least they covered Lenny Welch cause he recorded the first vocal version of this song which it's originally by Bobby Scott. Therefore, don't talk shit.
You'll notice the "hate language" almost always comes from people who do post any examples of their own talent. They only come to YouTube to denigrate others and feed their injured egos.
Beatles may have been more popular -- but the Hollies were the best live British act. Great harmonies and incredible stage presence and professionalism. Awesome band!
this version is entirely different from the Beatles, but, I think it's nice that we get to hear songs performed in different styles. there is nothing wrong with variety, and, it shouldn't be compared, just enjoyed as a whole. it pretty much goes without saying The Beatles kick everyone out of the water but that doesn't mean that other bands should be ignored. The Hollies are incredible and the way they performed this song was unique and very enjoyable.
@HALIDAYINN - to hell with hollywood, cheers to Hollietijuana! - good one, halidayinn - critical comparisons are stupid beatle fans- beatles vs hollies - like apples and oranges - a rousing rendition - john would have appreciated it and he did.
Ah Ha! This proves my idea that The Hollies wound up more like Herb Alpert rather than the groups they started out like.
I love most of their career, and I think I've got most of their classic lp's. But man, they made some very weird decisions regarding their direction after Nash's departure.
I also love Herb Alpert, so my comment is not meant to offend the die hard fans.
This man Allan Clarke is in a class of greatness by himself. As for the rest of the band members they too were greatly talented in the own right. Put this all together and you have the best ever without a doubt.
BETTER than the Beatles? I think not! It's commercial crap. The Hollyies are standing there trying to be clones of the Beatles, pinching one of the songs the Beatles already made into a hit. Sorry, COMMERCIAL CRAP.
At least, spell their name right, 'The Hollies'! (duh!)? I like 'The 'Beetles '(sp?) too, but I prefer this version of 'A Taste of Honey', as Bart Simpson would say, 'Don't have a cow, man!' (or woman)
The HOLLIES credibility stands the test of time,they can only be considered as a great band that has millions of fans throughout the years in dozens of countries.
Hmmm, seems the Beatles also liked "commercial crap" enough to record the same tune. This is actually a cover of the 1965 Herb Alpert version (featuring the powerful drumming of The Ventures Mel Taylor).
Yeah, The Beatles were thee vanguard of '60s pop, but it doesn't mean that other bands didn't occasionally outdo them, particularly in the live setting.
The Beatles must be my all time favorites, but there's so much more to life and especially music. There were a million great bands back then!
Can't believe in all the comments here only ONE has mentioned the incredible drumming of Bobby Elliot! He was generally recognized by his industry peers as one of thee best of the day (along with session ace Bobby Graham). The Gene Krupa of Beat, perhaps?
Sad about the cabaret outfits, but at least musically they could still wipe the floor with the competition.
I've realized that music back then in the sixties are more happier and more jollier now if you listen to punk rock or heavy metal all they are talking about are sad and sometimes talking about death but the Beatles, and any other band in the sixties played more mellow music.
The people who really know about music, specially sixties music, know about the beatles, The hollies, The rolling stones, The mamas and the papas, The zombies, The searchers, Dave´s clark five, The loving spoonfull, even the monkees, maybe not so greatest as the beatles but good enough to remain in time. by the way, this is a wonderfull version.
Interesting you mentioned The Zombies here, friend. Colin Blunstone went on to work with Alan Parsons (hear his distinctive vocals on 'Pyramid'), as did Allan Clarke. Talent attracts Talent!
What's not to love? Live too, I'm sure. Yummy Allan really seems to be enjoying the experience, and they can certainly hold their own with the orchestra. Amazing post! Thank you.
The Hollies are rock group from Manchester, England, whose video you happened to be commenting on, so you must know who they are, too, or you wouldn't be here. People who like sixties music know and like the Hollies, and their music has also stood the test of time like the Beatles' has.
There was no such as thing as being better or worse than the Beatles. Each band was unique in their own way and had talented in their own right. To say who wasn't better than the Beatles shows your ignorance.
The Hollies hands down over the Beattles, no comparison!
northbaystud 1 week ago
beacouse i am beatles fan gotta say its better than this, but this is not bad at all! love these stemmas
passiize1 1 week ago
2nd only to the Herb Alpert instrumental version, as vocals go on this song, they rank first.
TheLegendaryTim 1 month ago
I like the drummer's clothes
killerisiti 1 month ago
Comment removed
killerisiti 1 month ago
Odd that this isn't in color, being performed in 1969.
73849309378 2 months ago
Great version but not raw like the Beatles version, you certainly don't need a full orchestra to back this great song up, beatles for me hands down.
1smartys 2 months ago
From Brazil
The beatles were genius... But the hollies are great.
Thanks for this video... fantastic.
mtc1982mtc 3 months ago
love the beatles, but the hollies version is way better
thegreendome 3 months ago 7
Hollies do this much much better~~~ j
SuperAlaska2011 3 months ago 2
Comment removed
justoutofkey 4 months ago
Meanwhile, bowties are cool !
justoutofkey 4 months ago 3
My favorite version.
ninefivesuited 4 months ago 2
this is a more pro version than the beatles s'...my opinion
alejandrosuckmy 4 months ago 4
Wow, they look so handsome, sexy, and cute here. Love those suits. Tony is HOT!!
ladybluluv 4 months ago
1:41 Watch as Terry loses his guitar pick but keeps going as he looks around for it. What a pro!
heymaryann1 4 months ago 4
the beatles r the better band, but the hollies did this song better, honestly
050HAR 5 months ago
meh. Beatles are good, but this is a different arrangement. i personally like the Beatles version better (probably because i heard it first), but i'm not hating on this one. Hollies are good too. :)
trekkiekid3000 5 months ago
Top comments say the Beatles did this better? Did they even listen to the Hollies version or read the original sheet music? Beatles way too slow, Hollies almost a little too fast but kept the feel of the song as Herp Alpert did in the instrumental. I played this song growning up and the sheet music directs you to play slow in the intro then speed way up for the main body and slow where Herp slows of the which the Beatles did not do. Hollies way better!
checksixproductions 5 months ago 2
This is a vocal adaptation of the Herb Alpert & The Tijuana Brass version.... nice job though....
SEVFEST 5 months ago
I need a suit like that ...
MrOzonio 5 months ago
Herb Alpert did this one.....
.Without vocals. Still great job.
52hogan 6 months ago
I have to put my two cents worth in on best band ever..ABBA..Followed closely by The Beach Boys
impassable 6 months ago
8 people don't like honey
Wilfred45 7 months ago
Amazing!!
libedeo 7 months ago
the "shake it" part was pure class
valerock667 7 months ago
very enjoyable, maybe a bit caberetish, but proffesional prefer their album version this is a better version than Beatles, and the Hollies ie Tony Hicks better guitarist than George Harrison and Bobby Elliot better drummer than Ringo, and Allan superior singer to bothe John and Paul.
purpledave100 8 months ago
@purpledave100 You hit the nail on the head! I agree with you totally about Tony, Bobby and Allan.
ocarrington 7 months ago
@purpledave100 and you and my X girlfriend would get along just fine....
m1kewithaone 7 months ago
different musical arregments that's all
efrainc23 8 months ago
THE HOLLIES & THE BEATLES= BEST OF THE 60S
LONDONLAD789 8 months ago 3
was this from 1969?
QUASARA 8 months ago
Fuck the beatles. Hollies rules =)
seuko 8 months ago
@seuko Your mom fucked a beetle and then accidentally shit you
EPFstrength5 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I photographed the Hollies in 1977 in Canada. To see the shots go to ianmarkmusicphotos (.com)
mrianmark 8 months ago
Gran versión de "The Hollies" muy interesante y buenos arreglos. Sin duda muy diferente a la de "The Beatles" ambas versiones son muy buenas . Saludos desde México..
TheMultilith1 8 months ago
I still prefer Herb Alpert and the TJB, but it's nice to hear the lyrics.
macsnafu 9 months ago
Hollies do this better, much jazzier. kill the brass. the album version is much better.
arkeith07 9 months ago
Comment removed
DamienNicks 9 months ago
Verbal at the pace of Tiuanna(sp?) Brass. Right on
niflap 10 months ago
BEATLES IS BETTER
nikeby8 10 months ago 2
I've always considered this a Beatles song, but this is a surprisingly good version!
Strawberry7Lynn 10 months ago
A taste of honey both groups did a superb job.But completely different.
Eyelizzie 10 months ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
I love seeing Tony in those days. Cute...and his playing awesome!
ladybluluv 10 months ago
i love seeing Tony in those days. Cute....and his playing is awesome!
ladybluluv 10 months ago
Strange.. in my whole life i never knew this song had words..50 some odd years and I never knew..I thought it was instrumental.. Welcome me out from under my rock i guess..
DrFeelRotten 10 months ago 2
We vote the Hollies do this the best. Thanks for posting.
craignshari 10 months ago 16
We vote the Hollies do this the best.
craignshari 10 months ago
much better is the version of the singer Lenny Welch, who was the first and the pioneer in singing this song, so you have to give credit to him ... The Beatles did it better but they did not made up ....ok? The Hollies simply gave a more lively and cheerful version of the song, in general I like all 3 versions of Lenny Welch, of The Beatles and The Hollies, D
raquelmishe 11 months ago
Excellent!
imtxsmoke 11 months ago
i like this version much more than beatles
maxboesenegger 11 months ago
dudes...it was herb albert and tijuana brass style...
way groovy...
TheLeakaChannel 1 year ago
This song album which is what I go to Hollys
T0MMY1969 1 year ago
This is shite. The Hollies (who DID realease some great singles) are a fucking cabaret band here.
gazzo45 1 year ago
This was one of those songs that many bands did during the sixties. The album version is group thing and not a live performance with a big band backing. I prefer the more rock/ballad version off the album
b44ts 1 year ago
Johnny Rivers does a killer version of "A Taste of Honey" as well; it's just one of those songs that no one can ruin.
tojinmah 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Good morning, do you like sixties? Listen and pod cast my program " great sound of 60' s " on the site plumfm. Greeting and made blooper in rock and roll.
Salut, vous aimez les sixties ? Ecoutez et podcatez mon émission "le super son des sixties" sur plum fm. Salut et faites gaffe au rock'n roll.
supersondessixties 1 year ago
the singer was no rocker
BigBishop1 1 year ago
omg i thought the beatles wrote this song!!! did they??
1lundun 1 year ago
@1lundun
The Beatles didn't write it but they made it popular when they released their cover of it on their first album, Please Please Me (1963). It was written originally for Broadway I think
sparrowbananno 1 year ago
I like the Early Hollies much better. Great Band!!
etypebob 1 year ago
Was good but too many, let's try with a quartet
DonBigalow 1 year ago
Wow, this is a great version of Taste of Honey. Most of the time when a rock band plays a swing tune the drummer can't handle it. Bobby Elliot sounds awesome. His fills are great. I remember Bon Jovi tried to do a swing version of one of their hits on MTV or VH1. It was terrible. Didn't swing at all.
dgaup 1 year ago
Screw the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame. They waited forever to induct The Hollies, such a great band, and in my top 6 favorite bands.
SeattleLA 1 year ago
No words! Just incredible!
amplitudedude77 1 year ago
Check out the Tempations version of this song, it nice too.
toicannon 1 year ago
Herb Albert wins this time..................
52hogan 1 year ago
cool
musicmanregina 1 year ago
The Hollies are great. I liked them better when Graham Nash was with them though.
blabblab1212 1 year ago 4
idk i like all the versions that ive heard of this songs everybody puts their on little twist to it its cute
marsiissnazzy 1 year ago
GREAT VERSION !!!!!!!!
TheMarcWerner 1 year ago
Allan Clarke is the best! The Hollies Forever!
pds3939 1 year ago 2
McCartney's singing of it is more romantic, but this version by the Hollies, on the whole, is more dynamic and interesting, IMO.
spirtw72 1 year ago
they have been made wonderful musci and i do agree that they have been unterrated consequentelly.... but i always loved them. this has nothing to do that i am a strong beatles fan... you can love one opera and others too.... music has so much faces - this is one.... and even one of the best sides....... my opinion
odysseetheater 1 year ago
Bobby Darin also has a nice version of this song
20thCenturyLimited 1 year ago
did they make up words to this song?
bdhcarbon 1 year ago
@bdhcarbon no .. they changed the original lines a bit but there is nothing extra. i know it beacause i am learning actually the original version ....
odysseetheater 1 year ago
This is actually amazing, thanks for uploading :)
aJaroOllie 1 year ago
I happen to like the Hollies versions of this song better than the Beatles, even though I LOVE The Beatles.
ladybluluv 1 year ago
Very underated group
josny1 1 year ago 2
Thanks agaqin for posting... lovin it.
craignshari 1 year ago
no one mentions that this version appears to actually be a live version. If you're going to draw parallels between the beatles and these guys, put this up against any live Beatles recording and I think you will have your answer!!! Seriously.
SEANFIR 1 year ago
Comment removed
avilix669 1 year ago
91 000, sweet like honey
Marjorine420 1 year ago
This version SMOKES, regardless of what one may think of any of the other versions.
S M O K I N '
GreenDaveDefoeSt 1 year ago 3
NADA QUE VER THE BEATLES FOREVER¡¡ este tipo no le llega ni a la uña del pie a paul
vanedemcCartney 1 year ago
This version sucks the Beatles do it soooo much better
12345BeatlesFan 1 year ago
BTW, when it comes to harmonies the Hollies do not take a back seat to any group including the Beatles!
Jerrodswmhr 1 year ago 2
Notice how comments such as "The Beatles version of Taste of Honey is my favorite and leave it on shelf" Personal perspectives have NOTHING to do with the excellence that this version of TOH represents. At this LEVEL a musical awareness a true afficiando realizes that there is no good or bad. The Musical excellence the Hollies display for this era is impossible to refute. If you do refute then raise your standards!!! A the time of this recording these guy's were barely 20 years old. HELLO!!!
Jerrodswmhr 1 year ago 4
@Jerrodswmhr
Thank you! Thank you!Thank you! While the Beatles are one of my favorite groups, you cannot brush off every other band. The Hollies have earned a right to be recognized for their musical contributions and not just shrugged off. While enjoyment of music is subjective at some level, raise the bar and examine the technical and historical perspectives of the piece being performed.
vandemorem 1 year ago 4
Thanks man, most people like the ones who comment here indulge in Kool-Aid, chips, beer and burgers consequently they conform to limited thinking and become cheerleaders for the obvious great artists unable and or unwilling to acknowledge other levels of musical excellence.. Thank god only the Beatles existed in the 60's man I would have been lost without them
Jerrodswmhr 1 year ago
Hollies done it so well then ever wow!
smagisa 1 year ago
The Beatle's cover of this song is my all time favorite ever, this is the first time I heard the Hollies do it, and I think it is very nice, so thanks for sharing, but I would leave it on the shelf.
carolyn1e1s 1 year ago
I totally agree. =)
another65girl 1 year ago
@carolyn1e1s You should hear this with Graham Nash!
NewHopeNashFan 1 year ago
Dino Dinelli!
TJLethal21 1 year ago
WHOA!!!
Jerrodswmhr 2 years ago 2
cada quien con su estilo ambas estan buenas
ero cuando la interpretan los rollingns stones caciones de los beatles no me gusta para nada
mirniand 2 years ago
I like The Hollies versions of this song better than the Beatles too and I love the Beatles music.
ladybluluv 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The Hollies do this much better then the Beatles.
The Beatles version is embarassing.
JaimeSouviens 2 years ago
Beatles do this much better, but I still love the Hollies
kyannos 2 years ago 24
@kyannos
Ability to cover the Beatles arranged mass of talent is incredible, this song makes you feel Hollies is fast and painful to me as much as the Beatles
T0MMY1969 1 year ago
the beatles best band ever,.
miccarlos 2 years ago 4
@miccarlos Why don't you go say that about a Beatles video? Not hating on the Beatles but dude, I think they get enough praise without making random statements on other groups videos.
MegaUnclejohnny 5 months ago
I thought that was really quite lovely. I have never seen this video before and it was quite a surprise.
<333 ♥♥
conuregirl007 2 years ago
Yeah! Love how they did this song too!!!
ladybluluv 2 years ago 2
Those bow ties are epic. xD
I love the way they did this song. :]
falloutboylover628 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
so shit compared to the beatles, just so different in such a bad way, the beatles = best band ever, in all tenses
sadams291 2 years ago
I love the Beatles but I think the Hollies' version isn't bad at all.
lottiesang 2 years ago 4
Amazing how differently one can render this. From the famous Beatles and Herp Alpert versions to Esther Ofarim. Each one excellent in its own way! Also interesting for me the rating in the comments. It's understandable that most people have favourite version. But to abuse someone with a different taste (of honey...) is absurd.
Greetings from the Palatinate, Germany to all Hollies fans and thanx for posting this really amazing rendition, KeatonsAnnex. :):):)
osinho1234 2 years ago 4
MY LATE MOTHER ,WORKED WITH HOLLIES GUITARIST TONY HICKS, MOTHER WHO WAS A COTTON WEAVER IN THE 1950s IN NELSON LANCASHIRE UK . A REALLY NICE FAMILY. AND A WONDERFUL GROUP.
shytalker 2 years ago 4
this is sweet, but it's the Temptations for me
hippolytelin 2 years ago
Great post! I just saw the movie and I like the Hollies version of "A Taste Of Honey" the best.
Although Herb Alpert's instrumental from the film is great too.
Sox575 2 years ago 2
The Hollies version was by far the BEST version! You can't beat those harmonies and that Clarke voice.
ladybluluv 2 years ago
copied the beatles. the hollies are good but turned this song to shit
dasuit15 2 years ago
This is not a Beatles song. At least they covered Lenny Welch cause he recorded the first vocal version of this song which it's originally by Bobby Scott. Therefore, don't talk shit.
MarvinCooke 2 years ago 3
Thank you for straightening that out. But why always the hate language on YouTube?
savingbeauty 2 years ago 3
You'll notice the "hate language" almost always comes from people who do post any examples of their own talent. They only come to YouTube to denigrate others and feed their injured egos.
Alan62651 2 years ago
The Hollies have their unique and best ballads, sometimes better than the Beatles...
ohad3210 2 years ago
Cool sound and version of this song.Brillant. I love Lennon but no comparison to the Hollies with this song. Thanks for posting.
craignshari 2 years ago
Paul McCartney sang on their version. I think his rendition is excellent.
citybeat60 2 years ago 2
like this better than the beatles version
skunkhead2006 2 years ago
Beatles may have been more popular -- but the Hollies were the best live British act. Great harmonies and incredible stage presence and professionalism. Awesome band!
sellwood86 2 years ago 2
@sellwood86 Very well said.
SeattleLA 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
And their musical ablilty altogether was inferior to that of the Hollies.
this0033 2 years ago
The Beatles were not inferior to the Hollies. They had a different style and were equally hard-working musicians and songwriters.
sapphiretaurus 2 years ago 18
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Much better than the Beatles, they never had anyone with a voice to match Allan Clarke.
this0033 2 years ago
John Lennon's voice was a match for Allan Clarke.
sapphiretaurus 2 years ago 6
Thanks Vrinda, ITA, John's voice was superb.
citybeat60 2 years ago
You're welcome, Alex. We need to set people straight when we can.
sapphiretaurus 2 years ago
I didn't know James Spader could sing like that!
Doonyman 2 years ago
Excelente banda the hollies y sin duda mejor elaborado q los beatles.
saludos desde PERU
victoriadaniel 2 years ago
I agree and it's so different for them.
suzie0517 2 years ago
I never knew this existed. This is different. And as good as The Beatles version.
larkin38 2 years ago 3
Oh...Oh My God what a Toon...!
Yes its much better than the "Beatles".....
Shut up "Jenzeppelin" ya Spanner.
you stick "Bands that you know" and
getting "Beat-up" on "Brighton Beach"
***YA RIDDY DIDE"***
frenzybee3 2 years ago
i like the mix...
deaddrunkproduction 2 years ago
how big were the hollies back in their hay day, 3rd behind the big 2? can u tell me plze?
bryngOneOn 2 years ago
in terms of hits in the 60s and early 70s the hollies were second only to the Beatles
katdowli 2 years ago
this version is entirely different from the Beatles, but, I think it's nice that we get to hear songs performed in different styles. there is nothing wrong with variety, and, it shouldn't be compared, just enjoyed as a whole. it pretty much goes without saying The Beatles kick everyone out of the water but that doesn't mean that other bands should be ignored. The Hollies are incredible and the way they performed this song was unique and very enjoyable.
jenzeppelin 2 years ago 2
Interesting version, but The Beatles's one is much better.
lightcarrier 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
This is so cool!
mnsnake 2 years ago
Whats this? the Hollies meets the Tiuana Brass
HALIDAYINN 2 years ago 8
@HALIDAYINN - to hell with hollywood, cheers to Hollietijuana! - good one, halidayinn - critical comparisons are stupid beatle fans- beatles vs hollies - like apples and oranges - a rousing rendition - john would have appreciated it and he did.
avilix669 1 year ago
i never knew there were words to this song. Great.
alcosmsn 2 years ago
The Beatles did a much better job with this song.
harlon57 2 years ago 6
nice
ovelonse 2 years ago
no...the beatles ...the best!...
keziakarinne 2 years ago 25
This has been flagged as spam show
@keziakarinne
YES...the beatles ...the best!... (=^◇^=)
T0MMY1969 1 year ago
wow they do sound like herb
posturex1 2 years ago
Ah Ha! This proves my idea that The Hollies wound up more like Herb Alpert rather than the groups they started out like.
I love most of their career, and I think I've got most of their classic lp's. But man, they made some very weird decisions regarding their direction after Nash's departure.
I also love Herb Alpert, so my comment is not meant to offend the die hard fans.
marantz79 2 years ago 15
They did a studio version of this with Nash back in '65 or '66! Only released in the States on the "Beat Group" LP on Imperial. Awesome version.
mndandy 2 years ago
This man Allan Clarke is in a class of greatness by himself. As for the rest of the band members they too were greatly talented in the own right. Put this all together and you have the best ever without a doubt.
EJGGEV 2 years ago 3
BETTER than the Beatles? I think not! It's commercial crap. The Hollyies are standing there trying to be clones of the Beatles, pinching one of the songs the Beatles already made into a hit. Sorry, COMMERCIAL CRAP.
MrVeryStrangelife 2 years ago 14
At least, spell their name right, 'The Hollies'! (duh!)? I like 'The 'Beetles '(sp?) too, but I prefer this version of 'A Taste of Honey', as Bart Simpson would say, 'Don't have a cow, man!' (or woman)
imusfan48 2 years ago 2
The HOLLIES credibility stands the test of time,they can only be considered as a great band that has millions of fans throughout the years in dozens of countries.
ricogarion 2 years ago 2
Hmmm, seems the Beatles also liked "commercial crap" enough to record the same tune. This is actually a cover of the 1965 Herb Alpert version (featuring the powerful drumming of The Ventures Mel Taylor).
Yeah, The Beatles were thee vanguard of '60s pop, but it doesn't mean that other bands didn't occasionally outdo them, particularly in the live setting.
The Beatles must be my all time favorites, but there's so much more to life and especially music. There were a million great bands back then!
mndandy 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This is 'way better than 'The Beatles' version! Love the 'lush' orchestration back-up! What a 'kick-ass' song!!!
imusfan48 2 years ago
Can't believe in all the comments here only ONE has mentioned the incredible drumming of Bobby Elliot! He was generally recognized by his industry peers as one of thee best of the day (along with session ace Bobby Graham). The Gene Krupa of Beat, perhaps?
Sad about the cabaret outfits, but at least musically they could still wipe the floor with the competition.
mndandy 3 years ago
They have a chapter on him in a book on drummers [you usually dont see that in book stores sometimes in music stores].
spacepatrolman 2 years ago
I've realized that music back then in the sixties are more happier and more jollier now if you listen to punk rock or heavy metal all they are talking about are sad and sometimes talking about death but the Beatles, and any other band in the sixties played more mellow music.
hansg888 3 years ago
Hate those bloody stupid suit and bow ties. Major lapse of taste. I love the Hollies but this was always a problem with them.
Lack of strong, hip management.
Should never have let Terry go.
groovibri 3 years ago 9
I much prefer the Beatles before, for the Sgt.Pepper transformation and on....but man, The Hollies are so sweet!
And what a wide array, yeah?
I mean, Bus Stop to Long Cool Woman?
That is impressive!
infirmarybluesism 3 years ago 2
The people who really know about music, specially sixties music, know about the beatles, The hollies, The rolling stones, The mamas and the papas, The zombies, The searchers, Dave´s clark five, The loving spoonfull, even the monkees, maybe not so greatest as the beatles but good enough to remain in time. by the way, this is a wonderfull version.
bearis26 3 years ago 2
Interesting you mentioned The Zombies here, friend. Colin Blunstone went on to work with Alan Parsons (hear his distinctive vocals on 'Pyramid'), as did Allan Clarke. Talent attracts Talent!
Poopaloo55 3 years ago
What's not to love? Live too, I'm sure. Yummy Allan really seems to be enjoying the experience, and they can certainly hold their own with the orchestra. Amazing post! Thank you.
Poopaloo55 3 years ago 3
wow never hear dthis one. It has a early 50's swing feel as well as the way they are dressed. Never get tiredof hearing Allan sing!
AngelaRed 3 years ago
One of the true greats of the UK`s group scene of the 60`s & today !!!,.ktf.
djdeitch 3 years ago
The Hollies are still touring and still sound great! I have had the pleasure of seeing them in concert a couple of years ago.
gailb22 3 years ago
Great Hollies tune 5***** thanks for sharing!!!
Peace
Dave
RADBAND 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Much better than the Beatles, but who wasn't???
perthgloryboy 3 years ago
Beatles kicked hollies ass!!
who the fuck are the hollies?
wow
i bet 90% of every1 has never heard of the "hollies"
they didn't pass the test of time but the BEATLES did!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
tg2258 3 years ago
Gee tg2258 You talk a lot of rubbish :)
AsrudGilberto 3 years ago
The Hollies are rock group from Manchester, England, whose video you happened to be commenting on, so you must know who they are, too, or you wouldn't be here. People who like sixties music know and like the Hollies, and their music has also stood the test of time like the Beatles' has.
sapphiretaurus 3 years ago 2
There was no such as thing as being better or worse than the Beatles. Each band was unique in their own way and had talented in their own right. To say who wasn't better than the Beatles shows your ignorance.
sapphiretaurus 3 years ago
That is a great YouTube find! Thanks.
ericynot 3 years ago
This is a great version, but not better than the prior versions... a great lounge sounding version though.
Shakermaker1995 3 years ago
Now that's showbiz!
videoeer 3 years ago
The Beatles version is very bittersweet and poigant. One of Paul's best covers and it captures the true essence of the lyrics. JMO
citybeat60 3 years ago 5