Awesome...gonna order the same model, expect the 46' size instead. I am ordering online as I am getting a great deal. This video helps me with looks of it in a home environment. And that stand is the same as mine, only difference my is black counter instead of glass. That's for the video...this helped me decide over a couple others!
I have this Panasonic HDTV and it has a Fantastic picture. I also play my Xbox 360 games on it. A Plasma display is a great display to game on. The picture is amazing. Once you go Plasma, you'll never want to go back to a LCD display.
So how are the Wii Vids' coming along? Anyways, I actually checked out the PN50A550 yesterday as well as the 85U....All i can say is the Sammy had better color, while the Panny had the slight edge on blacks. And i've been hearing about the green ghosting that happens while playing videogames on the 85U, don't know if that's a problem for some of them or all.But ya, the 800U is the king of plasmas right now(besides pioneer) but they're pretty expensive.
Hi ,I'm interested in buying this tv but i'm very concerned about glare and reflection issues as my living room is big and has a lot of double windows.Could you please let me know how the tv performs in bright light environment.
LCDs are generally better with regard to glare and bright rooms. However, when it gets dark, the flaws of LCDs become very apparent with relatively poor black levels and potentially uneven backlighting. I don't have great issues with reflections as they have improved the antireflective surfaces over the years as well as the brightness of plasmas. Go to a store and look at them from angles. There are lots of bright lights in there which could give you some idea of reflections.
I'm also set on getting the Samsung PN50A450, but for some odd reason the resolution is 1024x768 on Samsungs website...Yet on every other website it's listed as 1365x768. I mean it has to be the higher res, i mean what 50" plasma has a res of 1024x768? because if that's the case i'm not buying.
Anyways, you know what would be awesome, if you posted up a video trying ouy the 360 and Wii on your Plasma.
I checked it out... don't worry its 1365x768. I still recommend a 1080p, but it's ultimately your decision. My brother owns the Panasonic TH-50PZ700u. He has a Wii and 360 and can post some vids of some games on his set. Will be a day or 2 before he can get them posted though.
As for 1080p, i'm sort of considering it..I mean what turns me off about 1365x768 is that it's a fixed resolution, but what turns me off about 1080p(besides the higher price tag) is that people have been saying the 360/PS3 take a hit framerate wise when displayed at 1080p due to the limmited power of their graphic cards(whatever) And i'm a frame rate whore, so if really does take a hit, than it's a no for me.
where are you getting the info about the framerate issues on the 1080p sets?? I have played lots of FPS on both LCD 1080p and Plasma 1080p sets. I have never really noticed a framerate problem with either and I can usually spot stuff like that. We'll try to have those vids up by tomm.
I've heard a few people on random message boards saying that the 360 can only output 1080p at up to 30(instead of 60) frames per second, overall giving certain games an inferior frame rate...But it does sound a bit bogus I guess. But some other people are saying that it's not true and that it looks better and plays perfectly at 1080p since it's a supported resolution and not fixed.
Also, I've been hearing how the Samsung PN50A450 has great color, but the blacks could be better, and the displays seems to have IR problems and so on. So now i'm actually really considering getting the TH-42PZ85U
From the research that I have done, the frame rate issue seems to be more game-related than tv-related. Almost all games are rendered at lower resolutions still (ex. 1280x1080 or 1280x720) so a lot of scaling is being done by the 360/ps3 or you TV. Choosing to be a 1080p Set is future-proofing. I dont want to have a set that cannnot handle things down the road. I think you would be making a wise choice going with the Panny, not just for the 1080p but because they make very high quality plasmas.
I plan on keeping this display for maybe around 2-3 years, then i want to upgrade. I actually wanted to get a 720p display, and then upgrade to 1080p display once the Next gen systems hit in around 3 years. The funny this, if these 720p displays werent fixed and were native 1280x720, i wouldn't think of going 1080p, But that's not the case.
and i also just found out the 42PZ85U is $1,799 compared to the $1499 sammy plasma...and then there's the PZ8OU which appears to have a lower contrast ratio and a not so nice looking design compared to the PZ85U, but it's 1,499...damn. I think I'm really just going to save a bit and go for the PZ85U, and it's funny, i planned on spending a little over a grand in the beginning, and it looks like now I'll be spending $2000
Oh and I know 1080p is a waste at 42" but because it has that native resolution, i guess that's why i'm going for it instead of the Sammy. Damn is it difficult buying an HDTV these days
Now I can get over Screen Glare, as I'm used to it with My CRT, but i've been hearing about picture dithering, video noise and 360/PS3 games not looking as crisp or clear compared to an LCD. Is this true?
If you are going 50 inches, be sure to go 1080p. You might look at the Panasonic TH-50PZ80U to save a few dollars if you don't need a PC input or can use HDMI from your PC.
Awesome, I thaught so. Well, i've narrowed it down to 2 models, well 3 actually....But since the PN42A450 Plasma has a lower Res 0f 1024x768 I'd be be losing 256 Pixels, ugh. But as for the other 2 >
~Samsung PN50A450 50" 720p Plasma
~Panasonic TH-42PZ85U 42" 1080p Plasma
the 50" sammy has the 1366x768, although i didn't plan on going that large, but I can make the space.
...and the one advantage it 'does' have is the higher res(1366x768p)...But i really don't want to settle for inferior colors, blacks and a 6ms response time...So what do you think is the best option?...
You are correct that the horizontal resolution is low. It will actually just have to rescale the image and throw away some information. It won't stretch it however. At 42 inches and a large enough distance, you probably won't be able to tell the difference. In my opinion though, I'd try to go 1080p if you can afford it as it's the only resolution that can take all HD resolutions without throwing anything information away.
Well, I'll be sitting around 8-9 feet away. And the problem I have with 1080p, is that the 360 and PS3 games are native 720p and Wii games are 480p....Now i'm guessing they'd look worse on a 1080p display due to upscaling....I know the 360 and PS3 'support' 1080p...but the games arent, they're 720p, so wouldn't they look even worse on a 1080p set rather than a 720p set?
....And as for the Wii, it only supports 480p, and i'm guessing it would look really bad on a 1080p set...And because of the upscaling wouldn't there be lag as well?...
I wouldn't worry about the 1080p. I have a Wii and there are no problems at 50 inches. There is no lag due to upscaling and it looks as good as a Wii can look at 480p. I would rather have 1080p so I can get all the resolution available from all sources.
I see what you're saying, And your display must have an excellent scaler then. Anyways, I'm probably going to get the Model you have, but at 42" Also, i'm just so used to my Sony 32" Wega Trinitron CRT SDTV, hopefully this plasma can match it PQ wise...Anyways, what's the response time for your display? or any new typical plasma for that matter, I know CRTs are the greatest when it comes to this, they're 0ms right?
I really don't think you'll be disappointed. Response time is just not really an issue. You can kinda think of a plasma as a big thick CRT. A plasma display is the closest thing to a CRT in the world of currently available flat panel technologies.
Also, and i really don't want to go 50" to get that higher res...Anyways, so if I do pick up the 42"...Will the detail loss from the lower res be that bad?...And somebody was saying 1024x768p isn't 16/9...it's 4/3, so therefor it has to stretch the image. I'm not exactly sure...But ya, the other model i'm looking at is the Samsung LN40A450 720p LCD...
As it stands(for now) Plasma is superior. If you wan't better and more life-like colors, better blacks and faster response time, then go with Plasma....I myself am actually thinking about pickin up the Samsung PN42A450....I wan't it for 360,PS3,Wii,Blu ray and Dvds'....But the only problem is, is that i'm thrown off by its '1024x768p' Resolution, which is less than true 720p(1280x720p) and lower than 1366x768p(which 720p LCDs have)
Actually that is one of the situations where the difference between plasma and LCD will become apparent. LCDs at this point can't typically match the black levels of a good plasma display. In addition, there can be a lot of uneven backlight with an LCD. These will become more noticeable in a dark room.
In general, plasmas are known to have better black levels. Burn-in is not really the issue that it used to be. You should avoid leaving the TV set to a very bright mode or leaving static images on the screen for the first 100 hours or so as it is more sensitive during that period. You could see some image retention from time to time where there is a faint image of something that was on the screen. This will go away quickly after putting something different on the screen for a few minutes.
this is the point. before know this i prefered the lcds, but now.....are you sure the blacks are still better on pz??? how about for example a samsung lcd series 6 or a sony or philips lcd, in a dark room.....beacause in a shop it is difficult to understand the real black level of a tv...
i am indecided between pz or series 6, then lcd has motion blur but pz has phosfors trails, and there is even the burn in problems
Neither technology is perfect. Based on my research at this point, I'd go with plasma....especially with the GREAT prices on plasmas. Only if you plan to use the TV as a computer monitor a LOT or have a VERY bright room is an LCD perhaps a better choice.
LED backlit LCDs have really good black levels as well. Most LCDs use a high-powered fluorescent lamp that is always on during operation. But LED backlit displays can produce better black levels because they can actually shut off individual LED bulbs which means excellent black levels. I personally prefer LCD because I'm a gamer so I don't want the game HUD permanently burnt into the screen, and LCDs are much better for moderate to brightly-lit rooms because of their anti-glare screens.
Awesome...gonna order the same model, expect the 46' size instead. I am ordering online as I am getting a great deal. This video helps me with looks of it in a home environment. And that stand is the same as mine, only difference my is black counter instead of glass. That's for the video...this helped me decide over a couple others!
johnherrera305 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
you fucking idiot
filuci 3 years ago
does the Tv give off much heat?
123456654321mxz 3 years ago
It does give off heat like plasmas do, but it doesn't really bother me.
brothersontech 3 years ago
I have this Panasonic HDTV and it has a Fantastic picture. I also play my Xbox 360 games on it. A Plasma display is a great display to game on. The picture is amazing. Once you go Plasma, you'll never want to go back to a LCD display.
JBDragon1 3 years ago 5
Plasma is defintly better for playing games on. much Better picture than LCD
JamrockS89 3 years ago
somebody please guide me i dont know which tv to buy im stuck between panasonic
TH-46PZ82B or SONY V4000 im not sure which to buy
nqobile 3 years ago
So how are the Wii Vids' coming along? Anyways, I actually checked out the PN50A550 yesterday as well as the 85U....All i can say is the Sammy had better color, while the Panny had the slight edge on blacks. And i've been hearing about the green ghosting that happens while playing videogames on the 85U, don't know if that's a problem for some of them or all.But ya, the 800U is the king of plasmas right now(besides pioneer) but they're pretty expensive.
Nyana999 3 years ago
I posted a video of Halo 3 in our video channel. Quality really sucks so it probably wont help much.
brothersontech 3 years ago
Hi ,I'm interested in buying this tv but i'm very concerned about glare and reflection issues as my living room is big and has a lot of double windows.Could you please let me know how the tv performs in bright light environment.
Thanks
pezata 3 years ago
LCDs are generally better with regard to glare and bright rooms. However, when it gets dark, the flaws of LCDs become very apparent with relatively poor black levels and potentially uneven backlighting. I don't have great issues with reflections as they have improved the antireflective surfaces over the years as well as the brightness of plasmas. Go to a store and look at them from angles. There are lots of bright lights in there which could give you some idea of reflections.
brothersontech 3 years ago
Thank you!
pezata 3 years ago
@pezata Yrh great doesnt say in the manual that they devolop vertical lines and only manufactures can mend them.. might as well buy a new one..
karensheraton 1 year ago
I'm also set on getting the Samsung PN50A450, but for some odd reason the resolution is 1024x768 on Samsungs website...Yet on every other website it's listed as 1365x768. I mean it has to be the higher res, i mean what 50" plasma has a res of 1024x768? because if that's the case i'm not buying.
Anyways, you know what would be awesome, if you posted up a video trying ouy the 360 and Wii on your Plasma.
Nyana999 3 years ago
I checked it out... don't worry its 1365x768. I still recommend a 1080p, but it's ultimately your decision. My brother owns the Panasonic TH-50PZ700u. He has a Wii and 360 and can post some vids of some games on his set. Will be a day or 2 before he can get them posted though.
brothersontech 3 years ago
Awesome, sounds good ;)
As for 1080p, i'm sort of considering it..I mean what turns me off about 1365x768 is that it's a fixed resolution, but what turns me off about 1080p(besides the higher price tag) is that people have been saying the 360/PS3 take a hit framerate wise when displayed at 1080p due to the limmited power of their graphic cards(whatever) And i'm a frame rate whore, so if really does take a hit, than it's a no for me.
Nyana999 3 years ago
where are you getting the info about the framerate issues on the 1080p sets?? I have played lots of FPS on both LCD 1080p and Plasma 1080p sets. I have never really noticed a framerate problem with either and I can usually spot stuff like that. We'll try to have those vids up by tomm.
brothersontech 3 years ago
I've heard a few people on random message boards saying that the 360 can only output 1080p at up to 30(instead of 60) frames per second, overall giving certain games an inferior frame rate...But it does sound a bit bogus I guess. But some other people are saying that it's not true and that it looks better and plays perfectly at 1080p since it's a supported resolution and not fixed.
Nyana999 3 years ago
Also, I've been hearing how the Samsung PN50A450 has great color, but the blacks could be better, and the displays seems to have IR problems and so on. So now i'm actually really considering getting the TH-42PZ85U
Nyana999 3 years ago
From the research that I have done, the frame rate issue seems to be more game-related than tv-related. Almost all games are rendered at lower resolutions still (ex. 1280x1080 or 1280x720) so a lot of scaling is being done by the 360/ps3 or you TV. Choosing to be a 1080p Set is future-proofing. I dont want to have a set that cannnot handle things down the road. I think you would be making a wise choice going with the Panny, not just for the 1080p but because they make very high quality plasmas.
brothersontech 3 years ago
I plan on keeping this display for maybe around 2-3 years, then i want to upgrade. I actually wanted to get a 720p display, and then upgrade to 1080p display once the Next gen systems hit in around 3 years. The funny this, if these 720p displays werent fixed and were native 1280x720, i wouldn't think of going 1080p, But that's not the case.
Nyana999 3 years ago
and i also just found out the 42PZ85U is $1,799 compared to the $1499 sammy plasma...and then there's the PZ8OU which appears to have a lower contrast ratio and a not so nice looking design compared to the PZ85U, but it's 1,499...damn. I think I'm really just going to save a bit and go for the PZ85U, and it's funny, i planned on spending a little over a grand in the beginning, and it looks like now I'll be spending $2000
Nyana999 3 years ago
Oh and I know 1080p is a waste at 42" but because it has that native resolution, i guess that's why i'm going for it instead of the Sammy. Damn is it difficult buying an HDTV these days
Nyana999 3 years ago
Ok, i've stumbled across some other issues.
The obvious high points of a Plasma
+Superior Color
+CRT-like Response time
+Better Blacks
Now I can get over Screen Glare, as I'm used to it with My CRT, but i've been hearing about picture dithering, video noise and 360/PS3 games not looking as crisp or clear compared to an LCD. Is this true?
Nyana999 3 years ago
im gettin this in 42 inches or may be the sony 40w4000 which one's better?
nqobile 3 years ago
If you are going 50 inches, be sure to go 1080p. You might look at the Panasonic TH-50PZ80U to save a few dollars if you don't need a PC input or can use HDMI from your PC.
brothersontech 3 years ago
Awesome, I thaught so. Well, i've narrowed it down to 2 models, well 3 actually....But since the PN42A450 Plasma has a lower Res 0f 1024x768 I'd be be losing 256 Pixels, ugh. But as for the other 2 >
~Samsung PN50A450 50" 720p Plasma
~Panasonic TH-42PZ85U 42" 1080p Plasma
the 50" sammy has the 1366x768, although i didn't plan on going that large, but I can make the space.
Nyana999 3 years ago
*Actually ya, 9 feet seems about right
Nyana999 3 years ago
...and the one advantage it 'does' have is the higher res(1366x768p)...But i really don't want to settle for inferior colors, blacks and a 6ms response time...So what do you think is the best option?...
Nyana999 3 years ago
You are correct that the horizontal resolution is low. It will actually just have to rescale the image and throw away some information. It won't stretch it however. At 42 inches and a large enough distance, you probably won't be able to tell the difference. In my opinion though, I'd try to go 1080p if you can afford it as it's the only resolution that can take all HD resolutions without throwing anything information away.
brothersontech 3 years ago
Well, I'll be sitting around 8-9 feet away. And the problem I have with 1080p, is that the 360 and PS3 games are native 720p and Wii games are 480p....Now i'm guessing they'd look worse on a 1080p display due to upscaling....I know the 360 and PS3 'support' 1080p...but the games arent, they're 720p, so wouldn't they look even worse on a 1080p set rather than a 720p set?
Nyana999 3 years ago
....And as for the Wii, it only supports 480p, and i'm guessing it would look really bad on a 1080p set...And because of the upscaling wouldn't there be lag as well?...
Nyana999 3 years ago
I wouldn't worry about the 1080p. I have a Wii and there are no problems at 50 inches. There is no lag due to upscaling and it looks as good as a Wii can look at 480p. I would rather have 1080p so I can get all the resolution available from all sources.
brothersontech 3 years ago
I see what you're saying, And your display must have an excellent scaler then. Anyways, I'm probably going to get the Model you have, but at 42" Also, i'm just so used to my Sony 32" Wega Trinitron CRT SDTV, hopefully this plasma can match it PQ wise...Anyways, what's the response time for your display? or any new typical plasma for that matter, I know CRTs are the greatest when it comes to this, they're 0ms right?
Nyana999 3 years ago
I really don't think you'll be disappointed. Response time is just not really an issue. You can kinda think of a plasma as a big thick CRT. A plasma display is the closest thing to a CRT in the world of currently available flat panel technologies.
brothersontech 3 years ago
Also, and i really don't want to go 50" to get that higher res...Anyways, so if I do pick up the 42"...Will the detail loss from the lower res be that bad?...And somebody was saying 1024x768p isn't 16/9...it's 4/3, so therefor it has to stretch the image. I'm not exactly sure...But ya, the other model i'm looking at is the Samsung LN40A450 720p LCD...
Nyana999 3 years ago
As it stands(for now) Plasma is superior. If you wan't better and more life-like colors, better blacks and faster response time, then go with Plasma....I myself am actually thinking about pickin up the Samsung PN42A450....I wan't it for 360,PS3,Wii,Blu ray and Dvds'....But the only problem is, is that i'm thrown off by its '1024x768p' Resolution, which is less than true 720p(1280x720p) and lower than 1366x768p(which 720p LCDs have)
Nyana999 3 years ago
plasma or lcd they all look same when ur play it in dark room/no light.
raydenk36 3 years ago
Actually that is one of the situations where the difference between plasma and LCD will become apparent. LCDs at this point can't typically match the black levels of a good plasma display. In addition, there can be a lot of uneven backlight with an LCD. These will become more noticeable in a dark room.
brothersontech 3 years ago
mm....ooo..
now i understand.
thx for that friend.
plasma have more black level right?.
and what about screen burn in?
should i worry about that?
raydenk36 3 years ago
In general, plasmas are known to have better black levels. Burn-in is not really the issue that it used to be. You should avoid leaving the TV set to a very bright mode or leaving static images on the screen for the first 100 hours or so as it is more sensitive during that period. You could see some image retention from time to time where there is a faint image of something that was on the screen. This will go away quickly after putting something different on the screen for a few minutes.
brothersontech 3 years ago
OOOoooOOO....
that info really help me a lot
about plasma tv.
NOW I REALLY undderstand...
i tought it become permenantly.
raydenk36 3 years ago
this is the point. before know this i prefered the lcds, but now.....are you sure the blacks are still better on pz??? how about for example a samsung lcd series 6 or a sony or philips lcd, in a dark room.....beacause in a shop it is difficult to understand the real black level of a tv...
i am indecided between pz or series 6, then lcd has motion blur but pz has phosfors trails, and there is even the burn in problems
can someone clear my ideas????? thanks
thebrakko 3 years ago
Neither technology is perfect. Based on my research at this point, I'd go with plasma....especially with the GREAT prices on plasmas. Only if you plan to use the TV as a computer monitor a LOT or have a VERY bright room is an LCD perhaps a better choice.
brothersontech 3 years ago
LED backlit LCDs have really good black levels as well. Most LCDs use a high-powered fluorescent lamp that is always on during operation. But LED backlit displays can produce better black levels because they can actually shut off individual LED bulbs which means excellent black levels. I personally prefer LCD because I'm a gamer so I don't want the game HUD permanently burnt into the screen, and LCDs are much better for moderate to brightly-lit rooms because of their anti-glare screens.
canderton01 3 years ago
4,593 views and 2 comments.this video deserve more comment cause this vid is cool.i wish i had a tv like that!
mariohenri 3 years ago
Thanks for the compliment! :)
brothersontech 3 years ago
how many inches?
SmashBros10 3 years ago
50 inches
brothersontech 3 years ago
question: does the SD card slot on there support .avi files?
tyvm
Mz3n00by 3 years ago
To my knowledge it doesn't.
brothersontech 3 years ago
great Plasma! I ordered the TH46PZ85... :D
Magister528 3 years ago