Attention all viewers of this wikileaks/assange video or any video regarding wiki and assange: THIS WHOLE WIKI SAGA IS DELIBERATELY SCRIPTED WITH FAKE ACTORS, ACTRESSES AND EXTRAS. JUST WATCH FOR YOURSELF IT'S SO OBVIOUS. EVERYONE IN THIS VIDEO INCLUDING ASSANGE< I MEAN THE ACTOR PLAYING ASSANGE THE PRODUCTION VALUES A DEAD GIVEAWAY PLUS ALL THE FORCED PHONY MANNERISMS AND DIALOGUE YOU CAN TELL THEY ARE PLAYING A PART FOR THE CAMERA THIS IS ALL AN ACT. DO NOT FALL FOR AN ACT. THIS IS TV
I believe Assange initially wanted to turn the cables over to the public and let them read and interpret them. That strategy didn't work, bloggers and independent news just didn't pick up the story, so as a strategic adjustment he took them to the major news organizations to reach a wider audience.
The USA gov't use to only fabricated criminal charges against Whistleblowers and railroad them into prison for Exposing Government Corruption not journalists when we had a FREE Press as Oversight for The People. The USA hunting Wikileaks all over the globe to lodge fabricated Espionage charges is a MOCKERY of Democracy giving Evendice of how the USA gov't has transformed itself into a Nationalist/Socialist Government
Brother Nathanael is a fake, he still believes wikileaks is not a Zionist trick - invented psychology thousands of years ago but they called it Kabbalah Mossad did 7/7/2005
Alex Jones, Webster Tarpley, Max Keiser puppets and goldbugs
Bradley Manning is fictitious and computer generated
Jane Standley - reported that wtc 7 collapsed before it did
great message in this video - the gov can prod you but not the other way around :). Its definitely exciting to imagine the possibilities that instant wireless communication can do for the world; I remember watching a documentary called Us Now, it was really cool to see how people were running their own lives and funding their own projects without gov. assistance, and now your point on how ebay works can be used on a larger scale, really points towards greater freedom as a natural progression
Parenting also relies on force to tell someone what to do. Is a parent evil for disciplining their child? How is that for logical? You must understand, the use of force is unavoidable, government or not. Heres why: People have rights. Some people are going to trample other peoples rights. Sometimes the only way to protect a person's rights is to use force against the offender. Do you trust street justice more than an elected representative who governs wisely with the consent of the people?
@mouthpiece200 There's no such thing as inherent "rights" for being a human. We're just small creatures in a large world in an exponentially larger universe.. Less than microscopic specks in the timeline of the universe... You can parent just fine without force. I'm pro-violence/physical discipline when beneficial, but there is always an alternative. It is laziness that has been the downfall in every regard. There is no respect because no one is respectable.
@stefbot i watched the first minute of your video and then gave up. if you're going to make a show called 'true news', can you please do some basic goddamn research? assange is not in jail in sweden, he is in the UK where he has just been granted bail, and is fighting extradition to sweden. additionally, sweden is hardly the guardian of free speech against the US you seem to think it is if it is trying to pin patently false rape charges on Assange (having failed the first time he leaked)
Respond to this video...On Thanksgiving my aunt made this cake that she called cherry chocolate delight. Everyone loved it and wanted the recipe. I took a bite and said this isn't cherry it's raspberry. I threw my piece in the trash and cussed her out. She later told me that it was raspberry and then hung herself.
@gorgolyt i know he wasn't but i don't recall him saying he was in prison in sweden. that's what i meant to point out. i thought you hadn't noticed the date of the video posted.
@gorgolyt So very ironic that you condemn him for a lack of "research" yet exhibit your own lack of such in your condemnation.. Of course, that's typical behavior of any hypocrite.
Perhaps you should watch all of a video before blathering :)
@gorgolyt You weren't wrong about the jail in sweden thing.. Stefbot corrected himself on that note(with a later text edit, apparently).. Doesn't change the fact that you Comment on someone's lack of research after openly declaring that you stopped watching within 1 minute.. So, you know he doesn't do research based off a small percentage of the video and a single error? haha.
As for "fanboy".. I've only seen this one video of his.
@gorgolyt To break it down VERY simply for you(since you OBVIOUSLY didn't get it the first time)--- You accuse him no research. You no watchie the video, so that mean you no researchie either. Dumbass :)
@xESOTERlC wtf? if in the first minute of his video he makes an incredibly huge error about the basics of what he's talking about, why the fuck am i going to stick around for the rest of it?
what on earth is wrong with the logic area of your brain... are you american or something?
@gorgolyt Whine as much as you want, my logic is sound. Even IF his entire video was about Assange being in prison in Sweden(even though it actually accounts for less than 10% of the video), you would still be a hypocrite. You would be making a statement on limited research, which is the very same thing you accused him of. i.e. "Hypocrite". And how is it so huge? It wouldn't matter if he said prison on Mars. It's the premise that is important, the underlying implications.
@gorgolyt Greg of Gregorland is attempting to take over the world. He begins his ambitious assault by subverting the minds of his subjects. He first turns them against each other, using hyperbole and conjecture to detain the dissenters. He conquers his neighbors and nukes opposing continents. Joe Blow of the Allied Unit of Opposition to Indoctrination is trying to rally forces to oppose this world threat. Unfortunate for all, he opens his speech with "Greg of Marshalltown"....pity
@gorgolyt Ohhhhh... I get it.. Logic failed you, so instead of maintaining your ignorant role in this discussion, you've instead opted to take on a juvenile one and settle for the lame agenda of just having "the last word".. xD
@gorgolyt Even more applicable would be: Matt has a math seminar to present. Before he gets down into his main message, though, he opens with a few points about the Gregorland attacks that he heard on the radio. This has nothing to do with his seminar, but he's spends just a couple minutes mentioning a couple things. Unfortunately, he made a couple errors in his sharing(about something unrelated to the POINT of the seminar) and everyone left because obviously he must not do his research
@gorgolyt Religious people disgust me.. doesn't mean I don't acknowledge the merit of certain messages in the bible. If you're too mentally inept to be able to comprehend anything that isn't presented straightforward, that's your own inadequacy. Just because something appears to be standing still doesn't mean it isn't going a thousand miles/hour.
I hate to be dismissive of Julian Assange but when I found out he was drinking government kool-aid about 9/11 I knew he was a CIA asset. 911 was an inside job Julian, shame on you.
Big bad scary rogue Wikileaks _collaborates_ with major news organizations, which as you noted, generally serve as propaganda mouthpieces for the State.
Keystone cops asleep at their posts while the WikiLeaks bandit tiptoes away with all the goods? Only if you look at these leaks as accidental. Another way of looking at this whole situation: Wikileaks is a clever counterintelligence program that will be used to justify the next wave of sweeping authoritarian crackdowns on the Internet.
@Empathy37 It's amazing how simple people are. I know little about Assange/Wiki-Leaks, but it only seems plausible.. I have felt the same way about Alex Jones and others.. Even IF they are not directly being fed BS, they still serve a larger agenda towards a NWO. They are spreading misinformation and creating scorn for independent thinking and association with such groups.. and they are serving to rile a group of divided people that may eventually strike out.. giving due cause for suppression
Freedomain Radio and Stefan Molyneux provides some of the clearest, logical analysis and critique of our contemporary world I've ever come across in my 45 years on this forsaken rock in space. Thank you. Please vote for Freedomain Radio at podcastawards com. under two categories 1) People Choice Award and 2) Education. Be sure to check your email address to validate your vote. (Voting ends Tuesday December 15th 2010)
I would like to point out that governmental authority is derived by the representatives of the people (at least in the US). If we want the e-mails and communications of the CIA, FBI and diplomatic service reviewed in the public eye we are free to elect representatives to pass a law to create a body to do this. We won't, most likely because doing to would enormously hinder the operations of those services. I consider Assanges actions like stealing a persons mail then reading it out in the road
@SaucerheadTharp said "we are free to elect representatives to pass a law to create a body to do this"
We're beyond that now. This sham we call democracy is not the fair and just system many suppose it to be. It's corrupt and in dire need of reform, but reform cannot come by electing new leaders, for that would be nothing but naive hope. It's not so much who's in power anymore, but how much power they have. We've evolved past leaders and heavy handed governments. It's time for a change. CoOp?
@GMPresents I'm not really sure of the structure of a Co-Operaterative government. However, I suspect that where ever possible, people will find a way take undue advantage of their fellow man. At some point the benefits of cheating out ways the threat of penalties. But I digress. I havn't given up hope for this government. Both parties bitch about everything but still get the business of government done and hand power over to the next guy when theyr'e voted out. Can't say that for everyone
@SaucerheadTharp Time and time again I've placed faith in the idea that government can work, each time hoping the next candidates will be honest, trustworthy, decent, moral etc. It never happens, and it's our fault. We've tricked ourselves into believing that a single vote can matter, that the system will prevent rogues from running amok, but it doesn't. We've come so far in the past hundred years, yet we allow ourselves to be ruled by a tyrannical system. Democracy is not what we have.
@GMPresents My ideal world is one of 1 billion people or less.. no government. Subsistence living
Unfortunately, we don't have that sort of a world. The more people there are, the more regulation is required because the average person is an idiot that needs to be lead by the hand in all things.. quicker(and more interested in) to take from another than they are to share or "earn"('earn' has garnered a new meaning in today's society)
@xESOTERlC The world had 1 billion people 150 years ago and it was far more idiotic than today... the solution is making people less idiotic which perfectly possible in the next 50-80 years. Subsistence living would make us all idiotic.
@linghun I'm aware of the population spike over the last 2 centuries. . What I'm unfamiliar with is how "idiotic" the world was back then(possession of particular technology and knowledge, sure). Continue population growth as it is over the next 50-80 years and living conditions for humans and other creatures will be unbearable--in every sense of the word. As for subsistence living being "idiotic"--i suppose you're lazy. Otherwise, I'm not sure how it is 'idiotic'. We are glorified animals
@xESOTERlC Go to the middle of rural Africa or study medieval Chinese and European societies and it was illiteracy, religion, oppression and imbecility all over. Living conditions will only be unbearable with 10 billion people if we let environmentalists ruin technology which already has solutions for most problems, its the green enemies of humanity who want us to go back to stone age "subsistance level".
@SaucerheadTharp said "Both parties bitch about everything but still get the business of government done and hand power over to the next guy"
They don't get the job done, not by a long shot. If stricter controls were placed upon government powers, would there be as much deception and misrepresentation of the people as we see today? We shouldn't be embracing a system that is so corruptible. A waving flag during the transfer of power does not represent positive change, it represents a ignorance.
@GMPresents I respectfully disagree. I think the continued co-existance of governmetal powers and stability of our electoral process has much to be said for it.. But enough of that. What controls are you suggesting and how would you implement them?
@SaucerheadTharp said "What controls are you suggesting and how would you implement them?"
The solution is simple. First, any significant action or statute/act proposed by a 'proportionally' elected government would be put to public vote by default. Government would no longer have the power to make major decisions on our behalf. Instead, they would merely take on an administration role and power would be given back to the electorate. If you want guardians AND democracy, then that's the answer.
@GMPresents Your stated goal for this control was to limit deception and misrepresentation from the government. Let's roll back to the speech Powel made to Congress requesting we invade Iraq and the evidence provided. Would this change in authorization mitigate the risk of fraudulent reporting at all? If so, how?
@GMPresents I may have communicated poorly. What I mean is, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs reports to Congress or gives a speech to Congress. Would the fact that Congress was a representative legislature or a populous legislature have any impact on the quality of the information the Chairman presents? We can safely ignore the media in this as the quality of media reporting done is unrelated to the government structure.
@SaucerheadTharp I would hazard a guess that some famous, high paid journalists are now feeling ashamed about failing in their duty to report the truth rather than echo government spin. Mass media is as much to blame as our corrupt leaders. But how to solve it? I will need some more time to consider that.
@GMPresents Truly, the only answer to the current world situation is a world government. I don't appreciate their deception or the individuals behind this agenda, but a world government is the only hope for humanity..Population control. Education. Better resource division and allocation.. People want to bitch and moan, but they don't want to face reality.
Nothing you say takes from the fact that its espionage; It makes no difference if it's for a good purpose - what gives Julian Assange the right to steal information from the United States military? This is a practical question - the wikileaks information was obtained through an act of treason by an American serving our country. So Julian Assange appears to have motivated that soldier to commit that act of treason. Quit lying like its some soldier that acted in good faith - it was treason!
@DOHC2L Impossible for Assange to have committed treason. he is not an american citizen. however, i'm sure the State Departmen of Truth would love to say it's treason, and may already be promoring the concept, in order to sway US public opinion.
@routeoz02 When nations commit espionage they do so according to national interests. When individuals commit espionage they do so for personal reasons. So I'm not debating with you the issues - I'll let you believe what you wish to believe. I'm just debating the facts - I also worry about my government keeping secrets from me. Part of me sees the value in whistle blowing - but I also recognize the moral hazard of celebrating my government being underminded nor any other democratic country.
@DOHC2L said "moral hazard of celebrating my government being underminded"
If a ship doesn't hold water, then the holes need to be plugged. We don't have a trustworthy government, we have tyrannical oppressors called congressmen.
@thereallurker said "...endangers the lives of others? You don't see the morality in that?"
Put it into perspective. Compare the minimal loss of life (the threat of which is heresy at the moment) with the good the release of this information can do and I think you'll have your answer. Tyranny, by government or otherwise, needs to be exposed so that we can move forward. Otherwise, we will always be at the mercy of despots and the like.
@GMPresents You're kidding, right? This means that we, our diplomats, can't have open conversations with contacts in foreign countries because those contacts will have their heads chopped off if they talk to us. After reviewing many of these reports, it's obvious that there's very little value for the public. What good will it do for the public to know that KimJongIl requested an Eric Clapton concert? None at all, but it does mean that we're less likely to report information when we need it.
@thereallurker said "there's very little value for the public"
Perhaps you're forgetting how we arrived here. Governments can no longer be trusted to represent the people in the manner we would expect them to. Governments of the US, UK etc are being exposed for the crimes we suspected they were guilty of. Illegal wars, backhanded corporate deals, spying, lying...is this what government in the modern age should be? If we cannot reach the truth then we cannot move forward. Expose them and evolve
@GMPresents Sorry, your poor generalism of how governments can no longer trusted (you're talking about millions and millions of people in world governments) is no excuse for letting specific people hang.
@thereallurker firstly, the governments I'm commenting upon would be the UK, US and Canadian. Secondly, what are you referring to when you say "no excuse for letting specific people hang"?
@GMPresents Since you're defending those cables, you're talking about all the governments mentioned in those cables, and even if you want to limit yourself to those three countries, you're still talking about millions and millions of people. These cables jeopardize the lives of many contacts who are referenced in those reports. The Chinese government is not going to mess around. They'll read those reports, start an investigation and hang someone for speaking candidly.
@thereallurker said "These cables jeopardize the lives of many contacts"
I understand and share your concerns. Any loss of life is abhorrent, of course. But, the US was given ample time to view and redact any information deemed unfit for purpose. WikiLeaks is not a perfect organisation, they will make mistakes, but when you compare the POTENTIAL risks against the benefits, then it makes sense to continue as is. Also, I suspect the more important releases are yet to come.
@GMPresents I wanted to write but ran out of room: You said since all governments have failed us in the past, so it's OK in to let specific individuals hang for speaking candidly. That's what your comments are tantamount to. I believe you're smarter than this and don't really want to see confidants die, especially when there is very little public value in any of these reports.
@thereallurker said "...specific individuals hang for speaking candidly"
Of course not. I condone any form of murder. But until evidence arises proving that people have lost their lives as a result of these leaks, I cannot revoke my support. How many lives have been lost in the middle east as a result of western invasion? And people complain about 'potential' losses in this case - the surge of hypocrisy almost beggars belief.
I have found two more people building up the volunteerist system. Michael Tellinger in South Africa thought up Contributionism. and Dr. Carmen Boulter from UofCalgary invented Constructionism. Have you heard of these two they have youtube vids? I think Assange is OK because we wouldn't know about extrordinary rendition otherwise. Iceland against the banksters victory is wikileaks too.
Ebay is not a anarchical market. Ebay sets alot of rules that you must follow even disallowing the sale of certain items, in some cases, for political reasons.
Has it not occurred to you that Assange has been set up? They just allow this stuff to come out; later it gives them a pretext to clamp down on the Internet.
Note how nothing bad about Israel came out? Nothing that came out greatly damaged the military Industrial complex, though now we do know that people in the middle east don't mind bombing Iran...riiiight.
I am starting to think Wikileaks is a fake. Set up so the government will have an excuse to censor the internet. Cass Sunstein even wrote about doing just that. Setting up a fake site to leak bullshit information to have an excuse to regulate.
This is not about Wikileaks, this is about the USA wanting to pass bills to further censor freedom of speech; thus, create what they think is a problem, and then provide a solution. I am for free speech, bottom line. Wikileaks stands.
Thanks for this video. I´ve read the SPIEGEL some days ago and really got irritated at the point where they ponted out themselves and some other papers as the publishing guys.
As for Ebay, the site was taken over by wallstreet crooks who have taken it upon themselves to put out of business every mom and pop business which sold on the site and replace them with the corporate wallstreet businesses selling the same imported China crap that their brick and mortar stores are pushing on the public. Of course all these American mom and pop businesses no longer add to the economy nor are they counted in unemployment stats. All this is taking place while media/gov say nothing
The news as well as all main stream media is controlled by just a few people. This includes TV, radio, newspapers, magazines. Those few who control the media decide who the people are allowed to consider when electing these politicians in office today which is why gov. works hand and hand with those who control the media. So the idea that gov. is stupid in regards to these things is incorrect, the gov. knows very well whats going on just like the media. They just don't want the people to know.
I was surprised you didn't mention the child-kidnapping psychiatric cult that his mom and step-dad were a part of when you gave a run-down of his childhood.
Yeah, why talk only in terms of rape and consensual sex, when we can look into the gray area, right? To not explore the gray area is bigoted and narrow-minded!
See where this spineless avoidance of clarity and desire to look for gray area just for the sake of it, where there are in fact, none, logically leads to?
Now you see why your ilk cannot be taken seriously by people who know better about economics and personal liberty?
"A "I support Free Market Theory period". Only imbeciles speak in such absolutist terms."
Only imbeciles speak in such absolutist terms like consensual sex and rape. Why speak in such absolutist terms? That's for imbeciles! We need to look a bit in the gray areas! Not looking in the gray areas is bigoted and short-sighted!
See where you silly spineless avoidance of speaking in clear terms and looking for gray area where there is none, leads to?
Lol stefan, wisen up. They obviously predicted 9.11 because THEY DID IT. The way you try to convince people that the government is inefficient is extremely misleading. They know exactly what they are doing and they are doing a damn good job. Just because it turns us into slaves doesn't mean they are doing it wrong. Just wrong for us.
No, the problem is that a stateless society cannot even rise when people are so stupid that they think they are entitled to other people's fruits of labor by virtue of their existence and are deathly afraid to think beyond the box of the state. And your "absolutist terms" rhetoric is nothing more than dodging the issues at hand, a futile attempt to overcomplicate that which is actually very simple, and shows you to be a spineless slug who is afraid to stand for principles.
Feel free to clarify your actual position, then. From what I gathered, you call yourself an anarchist, yet support state-funded welfare programs, which ARE funded by extorting other people's money at the point of a gun, whether you like it or not.
So please clarify, are you an anarchist or a welfare statist? Or something else? I will be more than happy to have any misunderstanding I have clarified.
So you still think the problem stems from failure to elect the right bureaucrats to run our lives, rather than the very structure of the political system? Do you still call yourself an anarchist yet support state control of healthcare and other services paid by money extorted from people at the point of a gun?
I agree with your assertion that reputation is a good non-violent way to encourage the best from people and discourage the worst. Of course this is why we need journalism like WikiLeaks, to keep reputations honest, and real choices in our lives so reputations are relevant.
Information is the most integral part of all life. It is what orchestrates the dance between matter and energy. DNA is info. The clampdown on WikiLeaks stems from a desire to impair all "others" lives, and control all life.
I think it's funny, crazy that Julian Assange is the very product of an abusive child-hood, when free and loving Human beings are generally stagnant when it comes to revalations and leadership. Assange rose above his past to overcome his future and take charge of a present leviathan.
Trials and tribulations make us who we are, if we use what we learn and apply it appropriatly.
Very refreshing to see such an intelligent round up of 'the News'. It was an absolute pleasure to watch this, and will be 'tuning in' regularly now from the UK to watch more of your highly articulate delivery of current events. Wish we had more of this type of thing...maybe one day soon eh....I guess it's down to US! Many thanks! :)
@littlegreenpeapod i totally agree with you my littlegreenpeapod - intelligent, engaging, reasonable, ballanced - everything decent debate should be... freaked out by the parting kiss a bit though - lol
@OggyStoop Thanx Oggy - good works should be commended methinks - and so nice to see someone reporting world events without the usual 'sensationalist' slant that often prevails.... and clouds the issues.
I dont mind the 'kiss' too much - he's just sharing 'the lurrrve' I guess...we all need to do more of that in this dark world ;) One Love ...Peace Out.
Great video! Step this way, and be groped and your wife's breasts admired on a full-body scanner. Then, go to jail for filming a cop abusing his authority and the people under it.
The rumour is that charges of spying will be levelled at Assange. Like a dark veil lifting, and maybe due to the internet I'm recently recognising that I care nothing, and never have cared anything, about spies. My life has nothing to do with spies, and I'm fed by the media with ideas that I must be up in arms at any individual acting as a spy. Media rabble rousing is not working, thankfully.
stefan, you slipped. when you said, "governments need these news organisations" it sounded like you wanted to say new organs, which reminds me of...solzhenitsyn (or even 1984) and how he describes the "organs" of the eastern bloc (as opposed to the western bloc i suppose) . blah anyhow i certainly look up to you.
@bobzimmerfan real talk, these Wiki freaks tend to want to over shadow all the work the 9/11 movement has done at exposing the Truth ,and just when it's becoming a mainstream issue and it's being exposed on FOX, etc.. here comes these Wiki Leaks to steal the spotlight... And if it was just SO Easy to get these Top Secret Cables, it's either the worst damn job of security ever, or just like 9/11 , it was an inside job, this whole bag smells fishy 2 me....
We are anonymous.
We do not forgive.
We do not forget.
Expect us.
reLOVEution
mikiecope 2 months ago
They gotta polish off a donut hahahahahah
Watchdawg 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Attention all viewers of this wikileaks/assange video or any video regarding wiki and assange: THIS WHOLE WIKI SAGA IS DELIBERATELY SCRIPTED WITH FAKE ACTORS, ACTRESSES AND EXTRAS. JUST WATCH FOR YOURSELF IT'S SO OBVIOUS. EVERYONE IN THIS VIDEO INCLUDING ASSANGE< I MEAN THE ACTOR PLAYING ASSANGE THE PRODUCTION VALUES A DEAD GIVEAWAY PLUS ALL THE FORCED PHONY MANNERISMS AND DIALOGUE YOU CAN TELL THEY ARE PLAYING A PART FOR THE CAMERA THIS IS ALL AN ACT. DO NOT FALL FOR AN ACT. THIS IS TV
Israylite4EVER 7 months ago
I believe Assange initially wanted to turn the cables over to the public and let them read and interpret them. That strategy didn't work, bloggers and independent news just didn't pick up the story, so as a strategic adjustment he took them to the major news organizations to reach a wider audience.
dangoettel100 11 months ago
911... thats damn funny!
I'm sure they must be really close to catching those darn terrorists.
TeamLibertyExpress 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
9/11 was an inside job.
PsyberSourcerer 1 year ago
The USA gov't use to only fabricated criminal charges against Whistleblowers and railroad them into prison for Exposing Government Corruption not journalists when we had a FREE Press as Oversight for The People. The USA hunting Wikileaks all over the globe to lodge fabricated Espionage charges is a MOCKERY of Democracy giving Evendice of how the USA gov't has transformed itself into a Nationalist/Socialist Government
Debba99 1 year ago 6
@Debba99 well said.
JennJenification 5 months ago
Respond to this video... I didn"t realize J.A. had such a painful childhood. : ( I knew it wasn't great, but....so sad.
JennJenification 5 months ago
Well said my friend.
landlogger 1 year ago
@NeoLeafProductions 1. "how wwii started" by dr william l pierce
911 ✡ ✈ ▌▌
wikileaks - psych ops for Israel
Brother Nathanael is a fake, he still believes wikileaks is not a Zionist trick - invented psychology thousands of years ago but they called it Kabbalah Mossad did 7/7/2005
Alex Jones, Webster Tarpley, Max Keiser puppets and goldbugs
Bradley Manning is fictitious and computer generated
Jane Standley - reported that wtc 7 collapsed before it did
daviddevall 1 year ago
@NeoLeafProductions what?
messenger360 1 year ago
eek the holagraphic doctor of the startrek voyager series or that actor Carey
fisherman1955 1 year ago
great message in this video - the gov can prod you but not the other way around :). Its definitely exciting to imagine the possibilities that instant wireless communication can do for the world; I remember watching a documentary called Us Now, it was really cool to see how people were running their own lives and funding their own projects without gov. assistance, and now your point on how ebay works can be used on a larger scale, really points towards greater freedom as a natural progression
radscorpion8 1 year ago
@radscorpion8 eh bad grammar there but anyways
radscorpion8 1 year ago
Parenting also relies on force to tell someone what to do. Is a parent evil for disciplining their child? How is that for logical? You must understand, the use of force is unavoidable, government or not. Heres why: People have rights. Some people are going to trample other peoples rights. Sometimes the only way to protect a person's rights is to use force against the offender. Do you trust street justice more than an elected representative who governs wisely with the consent of the people?
mouthpiece200 1 year ago
@mouthpiece200 There's no such thing as inherent "rights" for being a human. We're just small creatures in a large world in an exponentially larger universe.. Less than microscopic specks in the timeline of the universe... You can parent just fine without force. I'm pro-violence/physical discipline when beneficial, but there is always an alternative. It is laziness that has been the downfall in every regard. There is no respect because no one is respectable.
xESOTERlC 1 year ago
"Monkey brained chicken-shits!"
misterbonzai08 1 year ago
@stefbot i watched the first minute of your video and then gave up. if you're going to make a show called 'true news', can you please do some basic goddamn research? assange is not in jail in sweden, he is in the UK where he has just been granted bail, and is fighting extradition to sweden. additionally, sweden is hardly the guardian of free speech against the US you seem to think it is if it is trying to pin patently false rape charges on Assange (having failed the first time he leaked)
gorgolyt 1 year ago
Comment removed
BrainInSkull 1 year ago
Respond to this video...On Thanksgiving my aunt made this cake that she called cherry chocolate delight. Everyone loved it and wanted the recipe. I took a bite and said this isn't cherry it's raspberry. I threw my piece in the trash and cussed her out. She later told me that it was raspberry and then hung herself.
BrainInSkull 1 year ago
@gorgolyt well the video was posted on december 10.
YourOasis97 1 year ago
@YourOasis97 ...and??
gorgolyt 1 year ago
@gorgolyt and the point is, this was LAST week. as in, old news. its now december 17. get it now? he wasn't mistaken. this is just a week old video.
YourOasis97 1 year ago
@YourOasis97 pretty hilarious that you've done exactly what i complained about in my post.
seriously, did you not think to take a second to check your facts before backing this guy up and embarrassing yourself?
it doesn't matter how old the news is because Assange was NEVER in a swedish prison
duh :/
gorgolyt 1 year ago
@gorgolyt i know he wasn't but i don't recall him saying he was in prison in sweden. that's what i meant to point out. i thought you hadn't noticed the date of the video posted.
YourOasis97 1 year ago
@gorgolyt So very ironic that you condemn him for a lack of "research" yet exhibit your own lack of such in your condemnation.. Of course, that's typical behavior of any hypocrite.
Perhaps you should watch all of a video before blathering :)
xESOTERlC 1 year ago
@xESOTERlC please point out what i said was wrong?
this guy made an epic error, just face it fanboy.
gorgolyt 1 year ago
@gorgolyt You weren't wrong about the jail in sweden thing.. Stefbot corrected himself on that note(with a later text edit, apparently).. Doesn't change the fact that you Comment on someone's lack of research after openly declaring that you stopped watching within 1 minute.. So, you know he doesn't do research based off a small percentage of the video and a single error? haha.
As for "fanboy".. I've only seen this one video of his.
xESOTERlC 1 year ago
@gorgolyt To break it down VERY simply for you(since you OBVIOUSLY didn't get it the first time)--- You accuse him no research. You no watchie the video, so that mean you no researchie either. Dumbass :)
xESOTERlC 1 year ago
@xESOTERlC wtf? if in the first minute of his video he makes an incredibly huge error about the basics of what he's talking about, why the fuck am i going to stick around for the rest of it?
what on earth is wrong with the logic area of your brain... are you american or something?
gorgolyt 1 year ago
@gorgolyt Whine as much as you want, my logic is sound. Even IF his entire video was about Assange being in prison in Sweden(even though it actually accounts for less than 10% of the video), you would still be a hypocrite. You would be making a statement on limited research, which is the very same thing you accused him of. i.e. "Hypocrite". And how is it so huge? It wouldn't matter if he said prison on Mars. It's the premise that is important, the underlying implications.
xESOTERlC 1 year ago
@xESOTERlC wrong, because no further amount of research would negate that he had not done enough research.
derp.
gorgolyt 1 year ago
@gorgolyt Greg of Gregorland is attempting to take over the world. He begins his ambitious assault by subverting the minds of his subjects. He first turns them against each other, using hyperbole and conjecture to detain the dissenters. He conquers his neighbors and nukes opposing continents. Joe Blow of the Allied Unit of Opposition to Indoctrination is trying to rally forces to oppose this world threat. Unfortunate for all, he opens his speech with "Greg of Marshalltown"....pity
xESOTERlC 1 year ago
@xESOTERlC cya
gorgolyt 1 year ago
@gorgolyt @"cya" .. lol.. yeah, ciao simple creature :)
xESOTERlC 1 year ago
@xESOTERlC cya
gorgolyt 1 year ago
@gorgolyt Ohhhhh... I get it.. Logic failed you, so instead of maintaining your ignorant role in this discussion, you've instead opted to take on a juvenile one and settle for the lame agenda of just having "the last word".. xD
cute
xESOTERlC 1 year ago
@xESOTERlC lul you can be baited like a lil fishy?
keep typin dude
gorgolyt 1 year ago
@gorgolyt Keep posin
xESOTERlC 1 year ago
@xESOTERlC ooooh you nearly hooked me there mr. trololo
gorgolyt 1 year ago
@gorgolyt I win. Thanks for the continued representation and glorification of my youtube pseudonym
xESOTERlC 1 year ago
@xESOTERlC yep you win
you win the game
the game
gorgolyt 1 year ago
@gorgolyt Even more applicable would be: Matt has a math seminar to present. Before he gets down into his main message, though, he opens with a few points about the Gregorland attacks that he heard on the radio. This has nothing to do with his seminar, but he's spends just a couple minutes mentioning a couple things. Unfortunately, he made a couple errors in his sharing(about something unrelated to the POINT of the seminar) and everyone left because obviously he must not do his research
xESOTERlC 1 year ago
@gorgolyt lol.. Truly... where is YOUR logic xD
xESOTERlC 1 year ago
@gorgolyt Religious people disgust me.. doesn't mean I don't acknowledge the merit of certain messages in the bible. If you're too mentally inept to be able to comprehend anything that isn't presented straightforward, that's your own inadequacy. Just because something appears to be standing still doesn't mean it isn't going a thousand miles/hour.
xESOTERlC 1 year ago
Assange is a fraud, think again..
TheConspiracyFact3 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheConspiracyFact3 said "Assange is a fraud, think again.. "
And your evidence is?
GMPresents 1 year ago
3:50 to 6:00 is awesome!!!! and the gov considers it terrorist behavior lol
donotfret 1 year ago 3
3:50 to 6:00 is awesome!!!!
donotfret 1 year ago
I hope that "collapse in the late 90s" is just a slip of the tongue :/
CroTuschek 1 year ago
I hate to be dismissive of Julian Assange but when I found out he was drinking government kool-aid about 9/11 I knew he was a CIA asset. 911 was an inside job Julian, shame on you.
creamrising 1 year ago
0:25 he's currently in jail in England not Sweden!
and this is called "true news"
nicaulkett 1 year ago
around 5:30 correction: collapse in the late 80s. keep up the great work otherwise!
MrLovington 1 year ago
Big bad scary rogue Wikileaks _collaborates_ with major news organizations, which as you noted, generally serve as propaganda mouthpieces for the State.
Keystone cops asleep at their posts while the WikiLeaks bandit tiptoes away with all the goods? Only if you look at these leaks as accidental. Another way of looking at this whole situation: Wikileaks is a clever counterintelligence program that will be used to justify the next wave of sweeping authoritarian crackdowns on the Internet.
Empathy37 1 year ago
@Empathy37 It's amazing how simple people are. I know little about Assange/Wiki-Leaks, but it only seems plausible.. I have felt the same way about Alex Jones and others.. Even IF they are not directly being fed BS, they still serve a larger agenda towards a NWO. They are spreading misinformation and creating scorn for independent thinking and association with such groups.. and they are serving to rile a group of divided people that may eventually strike out.. giving due cause for suppression
xESOTERlC 1 year ago
Freedomain Radio and Stefan Molyneux provides some of the clearest, logical analysis and critique of our contemporary world I've ever come across in my 45 years on this forsaken rock in space. Thank you. Please vote for Freedomain Radio at podcastawards com. under two categories 1) People Choice Award and 2) Education. Be sure to check your email address to validate your vote. (Voting ends Tuesday December 15th 2010)
eyejudgeeverything 1 year ago
Ah yes! Keystone cops .... Cap-stone Cops.....?
DragonYearJoji 1 year ago
Stefbot scares me because he's happier than me. I'm going to reject everything he says because it brings up feelings I want to never deal with.
JermJus 1 year ago
Name me one person who has died as a result of these leaks, just one? I smell a red herring by the propaganda machine, again.
GMPresents 1 year ago
We're not talking about "cows". We're talking about people's lives. Are you some kind of crazy ideologue?
thereallurker 1 year ago
I would like to point out that governmental authority is derived by the representatives of the people (at least in the US). If we want the e-mails and communications of the CIA, FBI and diplomatic service reviewed in the public eye we are free to elect representatives to pass a law to create a body to do this. We won't, most likely because doing to would enormously hinder the operations of those services. I consider Assanges actions like stealing a persons mail then reading it out in the road
SaucerheadTharp 1 year ago
@SaucerheadTharp said "we are free to elect representatives to pass a law to create a body to do this"
We're beyond that now. This sham we call democracy is not the fair and just system many suppose it to be. It's corrupt and in dire need of reform, but reform cannot come by electing new leaders, for that would be nothing but naive hope. It's not so much who's in power anymore, but how much power they have. We've evolved past leaders and heavy handed governments. It's time for a change. CoOp?
GMPresents 1 year ago
@GMPresents I'm not really sure of the structure of a Co-Operaterative government. However, I suspect that where ever possible, people will find a way take undue advantage of their fellow man. At some point the benefits of cheating out ways the threat of penalties. But I digress. I havn't given up hope for this government. Both parties bitch about everything but still get the business of government done and hand power over to the next guy when theyr'e voted out. Can't say that for everyone
SaucerheadTharp 1 year ago
@SaucerheadTharp Time and time again I've placed faith in the idea that government can work, each time hoping the next candidates will be honest, trustworthy, decent, moral etc. It never happens, and it's our fault. We've tricked ourselves into believing that a single vote can matter, that the system will prevent rogues from running amok, but it doesn't. We've come so far in the past hundred years, yet we allow ourselves to be ruled by a tyrannical system. Democracy is not what we have.
GMPresents 1 year ago
@GMPresents My ideal world is one of 1 billion people or less.. no government. Subsistence living
Unfortunately, we don't have that sort of a world. The more people there are, the more regulation is required because the average person is an idiot that needs to be lead by the hand in all things.. quicker(and more interested in) to take from another than they are to share or "earn"('earn' has garnered a new meaning in today's society)
xESOTERlC 1 year ago
@xESOTERlC The world had 1 billion people 150 years ago and it was far more idiotic than today... the solution is making people less idiotic which perfectly possible in the next 50-80 years. Subsistence living would make us all idiotic.
linghun 1 year ago
@linghun I'm aware of the population spike over the last 2 centuries. . What I'm unfamiliar with is how "idiotic" the world was back then(possession of particular technology and knowledge, sure). Continue population growth as it is over the next 50-80 years and living conditions for humans and other creatures will be unbearable--in every sense of the word. As for subsistence living being "idiotic"--i suppose you're lazy. Otherwise, I'm not sure how it is 'idiotic'. We are glorified animals
xESOTERlC 1 year ago
@xESOTERlC Go to the middle of rural Africa or study medieval Chinese and European societies and it was illiteracy, religion, oppression and imbecility all over. Living conditions will only be unbearable with 10 billion people if we let environmentalists ruin technology which already has solutions for most problems, its the green enemies of humanity who want us to go back to stone age "subsistance level".
linghun 1 year ago
@linghun lol
xESOTERlC 1 year ago
@SaucerheadTharp said "Both parties bitch about everything but still get the business of government done and hand power over to the next guy"
They don't get the job done, not by a long shot. If stricter controls were placed upon government powers, would there be as much deception and misrepresentation of the people as we see today? We shouldn't be embracing a system that is so corruptible. A waving flag during the transfer of power does not represent positive change, it represents a ignorance.
GMPresents 1 year ago
@GMPresents I respectfully disagree. I think the continued co-existance of governmetal powers and stability of our electoral process has much to be said for it.. But enough of that. What controls are you suggesting and how would you implement them?
SaucerheadTharp 1 year ago
@SaucerheadTharp said "What controls are you suggesting and how would you implement them?"
The solution is simple. First, any significant action or statute/act proposed by a 'proportionally' elected government would be put to public vote by default. Government would no longer have the power to make major decisions on our behalf. Instead, they would merely take on an administration role and power would be given back to the electorate. If you want guardians AND democracy, then that's the answer.
GMPresents 1 year ago
@GMPresents Your stated goal for this control was to limit deception and misrepresentation from the government. Let's roll back to the speech Powel made to Congress requesting we invade Iraq and the evidence provided. Would this change in authorization mitigate the risk of fraudulent reporting at all? If so, how?
SaucerheadTharp 1 year ago
@SaucerheadTharp said " Would this change in authorization mitigate the risk of fraudulent reporting at all? If so, how?"
By fraudulent reporting you mean the exaggeration - by the government and media - of the threat posed by Iraq at that time? Can you elaborate please.
GMPresents 1 year ago
@GMPresents I may have communicated poorly. What I mean is, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs reports to Congress or gives a speech to Congress. Would the fact that Congress was a representative legislature or a populous legislature have any impact on the quality of the information the Chairman presents? We can safely ignore the media in this as the quality of media reporting done is unrelated to the government structure.
SaucerheadTharp 1 year ago
@SaucerheadTharp I would hazard a guess that some famous, high paid journalists are now feeling ashamed about failing in their duty to report the truth rather than echo government spin. Mass media is as much to blame as our corrupt leaders. But how to solve it? I will need some more time to consider that.
GMPresents 1 year ago
@GMPresents Truly, the only answer to the current world situation is a world government. I don't appreciate their deception or the individuals behind this agenda, but a world government is the only hope for humanity..Population control. Education. Better resource division and allocation.. People want to bitch and moan, but they don't want to face reality.
xESOTERlC 1 year ago
governments are obsolete
5pecular 1 year ago
Comment removed
DOHC2L 1 year ago
Nothing you say takes from the fact that its espionage; It makes no difference if it's for a good purpose - what gives Julian Assange the right to steal information from the United States military? This is a practical question - the wikileaks information was obtained through an act of treason by an American serving our country. So Julian Assange appears to have motivated that soldier to commit that act of treason. Quit lying like its some soldier that acted in good faith - it was treason!
DOHC2L 1 year ago
@DOHC2L Impossible for Assange to have committed treason. he is not an american citizen. however, i'm sure the State Departmen of Truth would love to say it's treason, and may already be promoring the concept, in order to sway US public opinion.
routeoz02 1 year ago
@routeoz02 No - I said Assange committed espionage with a US solider who committed treason.
DOHC2L 1 year ago
@DOHC2L The US, China, Russia, UK, France etc etc commit espionage 24/7
routeoz02 1 year ago
@routeoz02 When nations commit espionage they do so according to national interests. When individuals commit espionage they do so for personal reasons. So I'm not debating with you the issues - I'll let you believe what you wish to believe. I'm just debating the facts - I also worry about my government keeping secrets from me. Part of me sees the value in whistle blowing - but I also recognize the moral hazard of celebrating my government being underminded nor any other democratic country.
DOHC2L 1 year ago
@DOHC2L said "moral hazard of celebrating my government being underminded"
If a ship doesn't hold water, then the holes need to be plugged. We don't have a trustworthy government, we have tyrannical oppressors called congressmen.
GMPresents 1 year ago
Many thanks. People like you empower me.
eckyspondoolie 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
– This video magically diapered when I shared it on facebook......???
(only I could see it) I guess someone felt offended.
scramblethink 1 year ago
– This video magically diapered when I shared it on facebook......???
(only I could see it) I guess someone felt offended.
scramblethink 1 year ago
This video magically diapered when I shared it on facebook......???
(only I could see it) I guess someone felt offended.
scramblethink 1 year ago
Comment removed
GMPresents 1 year ago
you said assange is in jail in Sweden, but I think he's still in the UK
darkstraw 1 year ago
Stefan, why do you think it's OK to leak sensitive information that endangers the lives of others? You don't see the morality in that?
thereallurker 1 year ago
@thereallurker said "...endangers the lives of others? You don't see the morality in that?"
Put it into perspective. Compare the minimal loss of life (the threat of which is heresy at the moment) with the good the release of this information can do and I think you'll have your answer. Tyranny, by government or otherwise, needs to be exposed so that we can move forward. Otherwise, we will always be at the mercy of despots and the like.
GMPresents 1 year ago
@GMPresents You're kidding, right? This means that we, our diplomats, can't have open conversations with contacts in foreign countries because those contacts will have their heads chopped off if they talk to us. After reviewing many of these reports, it's obvious that there's very little value for the public. What good will it do for the public to know that KimJongIl requested an Eric Clapton concert? None at all, but it does mean that we're less likely to report information when we need it.
thereallurker 1 year ago
@thereallurker said "there's very little value for the public"
Perhaps you're forgetting how we arrived here. Governments can no longer be trusted to represent the people in the manner we would expect them to. Governments of the US, UK etc are being exposed for the crimes we suspected they were guilty of. Illegal wars, backhanded corporate deals, spying, lying...is this what government in the modern age should be? If we cannot reach the truth then we cannot move forward. Expose them and evolve
GMPresents 1 year ago
@GMPresents Sorry, your poor generalism of how governments can no longer trusted (you're talking about millions and millions of people in world governments) is no excuse for letting specific people hang.
thereallurker 1 year ago
@thereallurker firstly, the governments I'm commenting upon would be the UK, US and Canadian. Secondly, what are you referring to when you say "no excuse for letting specific people hang"?
GMPresents 1 year ago
@GMPresents Since you're defending those cables, you're talking about all the governments mentioned in those cables, and even if you want to limit yourself to those three countries, you're still talking about millions and millions of people. These cables jeopardize the lives of many contacts who are referenced in those reports. The Chinese government is not going to mess around. They'll read those reports, start an investigation and hang someone for speaking candidly.
thereallurker 1 year ago
@thereallurker said "These cables jeopardize the lives of many contacts"
I understand and share your concerns. Any loss of life is abhorrent, of course. But, the US was given ample time to view and redact any information deemed unfit for purpose. WikiLeaks is not a perfect organisation, they will make mistakes, but when you compare the POTENTIAL risks against the benefits, then it makes sense to continue as is. Also, I suspect the more important releases are yet to come.
GMPresents 1 year ago
@GMPresents I wanted to write but ran out of room: You said since all governments have failed us in the past, so it's OK in to let specific individuals hang for speaking candidly. That's what your comments are tantamount to. I believe you're smarter than this and don't really want to see confidants die, especially when there is very little public value in any of these reports.
thereallurker 1 year ago
@thereallurker said "...specific individuals hang for speaking candidly"
Of course not. I condone any form of murder. But until evidence arises proving that people have lost their lives as a result of these leaks, I cannot revoke my support. How many lives have been lost in the middle east as a result of western invasion? And people complain about 'potential' losses in this case - the surge of hypocrisy almost beggars belief.
GMPresents 1 year ago
I have found two more people building up the volunteerist system. Michael Tellinger in South Africa thought up Contributionism. and Dr. Carmen Boulter from UofCalgary invented Constructionism. Have you heard of these two they have youtube vids? I think Assange is OK because we wouldn't know about extrordinary rendition otherwise. Iceland against the banksters victory is wikileaks too.
Sugamari 1 year ago
As usual, this guy talks so much to say so little.
DackBev 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DackBev And yet here you are .... watching .... and bitching
CircleBastiat 1 year ago
Very interesting thank you Stefan.
texme 1 year ago
good speaking. thank you.
b5kalad 1 year ago
Nice work, Stef. Thought-provoking, as always.
mysocalledknife07 1 year ago
@LilZiana create your own job
xonarchy 1 year ago
omg! a musician! heaven forfend!
pretorious700 1 year ago
Ebay is not a anarchical market. Ebay sets alot of rules that you must follow even disallowing the sale of certain items, in some cases, for political reasons.
ThePsychoticnut 1 year ago
Has it not occurred to you that Assange has been set up? They just allow this stuff to come out; later it gives them a pretext to clamp down on the Internet.
Note how nothing bad about Israel came out? Nothing that came out greatly damaged the military Industrial complex, though now we do know that people in the middle east don't mind bombing Iran...riiiight.
Assange prolly a patsy or useful idiot.
BarringtonDailey 1 year ago
Good points, however it was stupid to link his childhood to the leaks. Simply you failed to show the link.
Cheers
salbal777 1 year ago
Why are you criticising my hypocritical leaders?
Jonkero2 1 year ago 2
@Jonkero2 - so we can deny any secretive knowledge ofcourse!
OggyStoop 1 year ago
@Jonkero2 Haha! Made me laugh a lot sir!
brucegalliver 1 year ago
I am starting to think Wikileaks is a fake. Set up so the government will have an excuse to censor the internet. Cass Sunstein even wrote about doing just that. Setting up a fake site to leak bullshit information to have an excuse to regulate.
Problem
Reaction
Solution
st4ticblu3 1 year ago
Great video, i feel a little awkward after being blown a kiss lol, but still great video, very informative.
vkain100 1 year ago
Assange's lawyer is Mark Stevens?! Like the anarchist, Mark Stevens?
KennyEazle 1 year ago
THANKS FOR THIS VIDEO! I've heard way too much nonsense about it recently.
derdritteweg 1 year ago
how'd you put the news headlines and logo on your video?
LiberalCast 1 year ago
✭✭✭✭✭
WORLD PATRIOTS PREVAIL
KASPLARFO 1 year ago
This is not about Wikileaks, this is about the USA wanting to pass bills to further censor freedom of speech; thus, create what they think is a problem, and then provide a solution. I am for free speech, bottom line. Wikileaks stands.
inspirediam 1 year ago
Thanks for this video. I´ve read the SPIEGEL some days ago and really got irritated at the point where they ponted out themselves and some other papers as the publishing guys.
peach1981 1 year ago
As for Ebay, the site was taken over by wallstreet crooks who have taken it upon themselves to put out of business every mom and pop business which sold on the site and replace them with the corporate wallstreet businesses selling the same imported China crap that their brick and mortar stores are pushing on the public. Of course all these American mom and pop businesses no longer add to the economy nor are they counted in unemployment stats. All this is taking place while media/gov say nothing
aimeechrister 1 year ago
The news as well as all main stream media is controlled by just a few people. This includes TV, radio, newspapers, magazines. Those few who control the media decide who the people are allowed to consider when electing these politicians in office today which is why gov. works hand and hand with those who control the media. So the idea that gov. is stupid in regards to these things is incorrect, the gov. knows very well whats going on just like the media. They just don't want the people to know.
aimeechrister 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The government needs to be computerised
cjellwood 1 year ago
svtplay.se/v/2264028/wikirebels_the_documentary
ePOcp3t 1 year ago
thanks for elaborating on this. I didn't realize this aspect about the whole thing.
aletoledo1 1 year ago
This made my day.
holyfuckwtf 1 year ago
I was surprised you didn't mention the child-kidnapping psychiatric cult that his mom and step-dad were a part of when you gave a run-down of his childhood.
Wikipedia: Santiniketan Park Association
baggytheo 1 year ago
great video
adarqui 1 year ago
@TheElMoIsEviL:
Yeah, why talk only in terms of rape and consensual sex, when we can look into the gray area, right? To not explore the gray area is bigoted and narrow-minded!
See where this spineless avoidance of clarity and desire to look for gray area just for the sake of it, where there are in fact, none, logically leads to?
Now you see why your ilk cannot be taken seriously by people who know better about economics and personal liberty?
Akatam0t0ma 1 year ago
@TheElMoIsEviL
"A "I support Free Market Theory period". Only imbeciles speak in such absolutist terms."
Only imbeciles speak in such absolutist terms like consensual sex and rape. Why speak in such absolutist terms? That's for imbeciles! We need to look a bit in the gray areas! Not looking in the gray areas is bigoted and short-sighted!
See where you silly spineless avoidance of speaking in clear terms and looking for gray area where there is none, leads to?
Akatam0t0ma 1 year ago
Lol stefan, wisen up. They obviously predicted 9.11 because THEY DID IT. The way you try to convince people that the government is inefficient is extremely misleading. They know exactly what they are doing and they are doing a damn good job. Just because it turns us into slaves doesn't mean they are doing it wrong. Just wrong for us.
OntologicalQuandary 1 year ago
@TheElMoIsEviL:
No, the problem is that a stateless society cannot even rise when people are so stupid that they think they are entitled to other people's fruits of labor by virtue of their existence and are deathly afraid to think beyond the box of the state. And your "absolutist terms" rhetoric is nothing more than dodging the issues at hand, a futile attempt to overcomplicate that which is actually very simple, and shows you to be a spineless slug who is afraid to stand for principles.
Akatam0t0ma 1 year ago
Im 12 years old im a faggot FUUUUUUUUUUCKKKKKKKK MEEEEEEE
GunitForLyfe 1 year ago
@TheElMoIsEviL:
Feel free to clarify your actual position, then. From what I gathered, you call yourself an anarchist, yet support state-funded welfare programs, which ARE funded by extorting other people's money at the point of a gun, whether you like it or not.
So please clarify, are you an anarchist or a welfare statist? Or something else? I will be more than happy to have any misunderstanding I have clarified.
Akatam0t0ma 1 year ago
@TheElMoIsEviL:
So you still think the problem stems from failure to elect the right bureaucrats to run our lives, rather than the very structure of the political system? Do you still call yourself an anarchist yet support state control of healthcare and other services paid by money extorted from people at the point of a gun?
Akatam0t0ma 1 year ago
Stefbot and his black and white government view....
I highly dout the major media worldwide are not under government influency...
vegnagunL 1 year ago
You should have way more views...
SAMHOUSTON56 1 year ago
He's in Wandsworth prison, London, I think ... not in Sweden, yet.
skunkwerksrc 1 year ago
This is very intreasting
MartyHITD 1 year ago
I wonder who owns the mainstream new organizations...
MrHappy702 1 year ago
I agree with your assertion that reputation is a good non-violent way to encourage the best from people and discourage the worst. Of course this is why we need journalism like WikiLeaks, to keep reputations honest, and real choices in our lives so reputations are relevant.
Information is the most integral part of all life. It is what orchestrates the dance between matter and energy. DNA is info. The clampdown on WikiLeaks stems from a desire to impair all "others" lives, and control all life.
momentinpassing 1 year ago 2
FBI is you father (Female Body Investigator) AND
The CIA is your MOM (confusion In Action). together FBI is fool by intelligent With confusion In Action....Pure madness.
SteveXnycperformance 1 year ago
Great video, better even than the first one in terms of conclusive commentary. It's El Pai-SSSSSS
Spefbot 1 year ago
absolutely brilliant, Stefan!
LunkwillFook 1 year ago
A farm suppose to be a two way street? Your metaphors are to simplistic.
erdal0 1 year ago
Thank you for highlighting the wikileaks background Stef!
xyrial 1 year ago
I think it's funny, crazy that Julian Assange is the very product of an abusive child-hood, when free and loving Human beings are generally stagnant when it comes to revalations and leadership. Assange rose above his past to overcome his future and take charge of a present leviathan.
Trials and tribulations make us who we are, if we use what we learn and apply it appropriatly.
Spencerianism 1 year ago 2
Well said!
warzmx 1 year ago
Let the discussion and debate continue !
tenagliac 1 year ago
when did Assange get moved to Sweden? He was in jail in Britain last I heard
WillGerard5 1 year ago
@WillGerard5 He is in the UK but that's not really relevant for the rest of the video...
HelgeBuk 1 year ago
Comment removed
littlegreenpeapod 1 year ago
Very refreshing to see such an intelligent round up of 'the News'. It was an absolute pleasure to watch this, and will be 'tuning in' regularly now from the UK to watch more of your highly articulate delivery of current events. Wish we had more of this type of thing...maybe one day soon eh....I guess it's down to US! Many thanks! :)
littlegreenpeapod 1 year ago 29
@littlegreenpeapod i totally agree with you my littlegreenpeapod - intelligent, engaging, reasonable, ballanced - everything decent debate should be... freaked out by the parting kiss a bit though - lol
OggyStoop 1 year ago
@OggyStoop Thanx Oggy - good works should be commended methinks - and so nice to see someone reporting world events without the usual 'sensationalist' slant that often prevails.... and clouds the issues.
I dont mind the 'kiss' too much - he's just sharing 'the lurrrve' I guess...we all need to do more of that in this dark world ;) One Love ...Peace Out.
littlegreenpeapod 1 year ago
Great video! Step this way, and be groped and your wife's breasts admired on a full-body scanner. Then, go to jail for filming a cop abusing his authority and the people under it.
BabyHominid 1 year ago 12
vote in podcast awards
AnarchyEnsues 1 year ago
The rumour is that charges of spying will be levelled at Assange. Like a dark veil lifting, and maybe due to the internet I'm recently recognising that I care nothing, and never have cared anything, about spies. My life has nothing to do with spies, and I'm fed by the media with ideas that I must be up in arms at any individual acting as a spy. Media rabble rousing is not working, thankfully.
Sliptodance 1 year ago
It may be well timed - the US is currently destroying themselves financially.
srkh28 1 year ago
stefan, you slipped. when you said, "governments need these news organisations" it sounded like you wanted to say new organs, which reminds me of...solzhenitsyn (or even 1984) and how he describes the "organs" of the eastern bloc (as opposed to the western bloc i suppose) . blah anyhow i certainly look up to you.
freakfiend32 1 year ago
If you think they didn't know 9/11 was on its way I think you really need to do more research on the matter.
bobzimmerfan 1 year ago
@bobzimmerfan real talk, these Wiki freaks tend to want to over shadow all the work the 9/11 movement has done at exposing the Truth ,and just when it's becoming a mainstream issue and it's being exposed on FOX, etc.. here comes these Wiki Leaks to steal the spotlight... And if it was just SO Easy to get these Top Secret Cables, it's either the worst damn job of security ever, or just like 9/11 , it was an inside job, this whole bag smells fishy 2 me....
AudioTruther 1 year ago
@AudioTruther
bro, i doubt there is a connection.
weeearthlings 1 year ago