ok... impressive.. ok quite bad.. BUT if you were in, you'd be alive, if chinese make a rear engine car, a crashtest will launch it 30m away by the front window...
I had made my drivers license on this car. Although the 1970s beetle models had a crushing zone and the drivers compartment remained intact, you must consider that the gasoline tank was intalled inside the crushing area.
The majority of the safety cage remains relatively stable, although there will be some definite intrusion in the foot area, which could cause broken legs. Hell, this is better than some cars from the 1990's.
Not sure what the point of testing this ancient car in a modern testing environment is. Of course a car made before a set of safety standards were invented will fail to live up to those standards.
I mean FFS the trunk was in the front of these things.
not good, i feel like i would hit that front glass with my ugly face in this impact in this car, and that could make me more ugly. And then girls wouldn't suck my dick so often.
si es verdad. los autos chinos de ahora no aguantan nada. si un auto chino choca fuertemente, la persona que va adentro queda totalmente destrozada. ademas ni siquiera vienen con airbad, algo que es fundamental.
@vandenabeeleandries actually....its pretty poor, the steering wheel has been pushed into the drivers chest, the footwell (what footwell) doesnt exist, meaning crushed legs probably amputation, smashed face into steering wheel etc etc
What's ironic is that the crush zone is almost half the car yet there's so much crush zone that it dissipates the a lot of energy. Then again, the shitty part is the legs and skull are part of that crush zone, so it's a triple negative.
PLEASE DON'T READ THIS you will die in seven days if you don't post this comment on at least 10 other videos in the next hour, if you do tomorow will be the best day of your life
no, they discontinued in 2003. Interesting, btw, was the fact that the beetle in this crash test was bad, but that the Golf-2 was even worse. For a car designed in 1935, the crash results were not really bad.
In 1933, Adolf Hitler submitted sketches to Ferdinand Porsche of a proposed "Volks-Wagen" (the name means "people's car" in German, in which it is pronounced [ˈfolksvagən]), a basic vehicle that should be capable of transporting two adults and three children at a speed of 100 km/h (62 mph).
I;m sure it was not built or nothing by hitler but yea he thought it and all that stuff. I mean where and when was he gonna build it at the time? lol But yea.
Not really, hitler made a few rough sketches of what he wanted the peoples car to be like...the final thing was a bit different after porche ferdinand finsished DESIGNING it.
I think it performed very well. Unlike most cars of it's age it managed to handle a crash into a offset object. This is the worse kind of crash test. The door might crumble but the passenger compartment was still intact. The footwells are very open so no plastic dash and supporting arms to crush legs. Poor Herbie!
anyone seen those kia and smart crash tests done last year... they did not even get 1star on encap!!! will stick with my volvo though a nice passet would do!!!
I was (and in a way still am) a big fan of the old air-cooled Bug. However, my friend died in one after a crash. The old Bug has the fuel tank in the front of the car, unprotected, and in a metal case that is highly vulnerbale to sparks. The car caught fire immediately after the crash as jorikrademakers says above.
Not bad, actually. Notice how the cabin remained mostly intact, and that dummy could have walked out of it had he been wearing his seatbelt. Remember, the motor is actually in the back of the vehicle, and the front is mostly empty space, which makes for a very good shock absorber.
acctually, it's a 1974 volkswagen beetle, as indicated by the vents behing the rear window, the large round tail lights, and the bumper style. Oh yeah, and new beetle's blow, i'd rather take my chances in the old aircooled bug anyday, over a new beetle
yeah they were one of the most safe cars of its time but if you get a crash with it now at high speed youre a dead man for sure we own a couple of them,my dad had a accident with a 1978 1303 the car whas totalled and he was lucky he wasnt wearing his seatbelt because he was trown out of the car the bug exploded 10 seconds after the crash :p kind of funny now i think of it...
ok... impressive.. ok quite bad.. BUT if you were in, you'd be alive, if chinese make a rear engine car, a crashtest will launch it 30m away by the front window...
TheDzace 3 months ago
BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH. BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA *wets his pants* HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA *dies*
fpsPirate 4 months ago
1938 produced WTF?!?
peas1337 4 months ago
@peas1337 21 million were made!
triggerhappybullets 3 months ago
больно
daxter48 5 months ago
basicly if you crash this car you have a 100% chances of dying
patriargentina92 6 months ago
I had made my drivers license on this car. Although the 1970s beetle models had a crushing zone and the drivers compartment remained intact, you must consider that the gasoline tank was intalled inside the crushing area.
ichmalealsobinich 7 months ago
God bless the driver!
Tampinu 7 months ago
5 stars
TheReverud 8 months ago
Fares better than the gokart would've....
psptechnologypsp 9 months ago
Its good, remember this is a 1930´s car
SuperMrBentley 9 months ago
centain death
gdaubian 9 months ago
Right in the middle of all that crushed steel is the fuel tank-- Think about it.
winterka100 1 year ago
ouch....better hope i dont crash in my bug
nitemare125 1 year ago
oo it's so.........fucking unsafe.when you crash you get immediatly killed.L0L
MrThegodfather2010 1 year ago
You killed a classic Beetle?!!!
Madness832 1 year ago
@Madness832 it might not be classic I believe they made them into the 80's or 90's with the same basic design as the original
graidstin 1 year ago
@graidstin That could be true as they were making them in Mexico up until not-too-long-ago. But it just piqued my heart to see 'em smash up Herbie!
Madness832 1 year ago
The majority of the safety cage remains relatively stable, although there will be some definite intrusion in the foot area, which could cause broken legs. Hell, this is better than some cars from the 1990's.
punkmonkey123 1 year ago
its bad to know that i drive one of those everyday :S
soyongi15 1 year ago
Now that's a safe car
joshmccoy1313 1 year ago
Ohh, such a nice car, disturbed in less than one second :(
SnookerDaBest7 1 year ago
Not sure what the point of testing this ancient car in a modern testing environment is. Of course a car made before a set of safety standards were invented will fail to live up to those standards.
I mean FFS the trunk was in the front of these things.
Nonsensei436 1 year ago
Un disastro!!!!
Onemoremission 1 year ago
not good, i feel like i would hit that front glass with my ugly face in this impact in this car, and that could make me more ugly. And then girls wouldn't suck my dick so often.
zappasoul 1 year ago
ese choke es mas de 80 millas por hora :D si aguanta digo cualquier carro nuevo a esa velocidad queda peor :(
JOSHSLPCO 1 year ago
Quite a hollow space too since the engies in the back dont think its that bad
devilzzzzzzzzzz 1 year ago
menos mal que no voy dentro......
moonchild883n 1 year ago
add an airbag and it will pass "TODAY" in 2010!!!!!! not in 63
TheDriver713 1 year ago
si es verdad. los autos chinos de ahora no aguantan nada. si un auto chino choca fuertemente, la persona que va adentro queda totalmente destrozada. ademas ni siquiera vienen con airbad, algo que es fundamental.
thedarknight0011 1 year ago
nossa sorte que eu não tenho um fusca
sgwilliamproc 1 year ago
mi vocho rifa!!! U__________U
tikocorazondemetal 1 year ago
Fuckin' Vocho, is UNDESTRUCTIBLE!!!
326bpm 2 years ago
Better than My Chevrolet Aveo 2009
adnanodiab 2 years ago 3
@adnanodiab no not better man... this was done at 30 mph 48km/h speed, the aveo was tested at 40 mph 64km/h... so it isn't comaprable at all
kingeddy137 1 year ago
Not bad for a car designed almost 70 years ago. A lot better than that Chinese crap if you ask me
vandenabeeleandries 2 years ago 86
@vandenabeeleandries we dont ask you
ilias2oo6 1 year ago
@vandenabeeleandries actually....its pretty poor, the steering wheel has been pushed into the drivers chest, the footwell (what footwell) doesnt exist, meaning crushed legs probably amputation, smashed face into steering wheel etc etc
dergangedchipmunk 1 year ago 2
@dergangedchipmunk But take any car from that time , or even newer models , and do a crash test ... U will see that they wont do any better ...
Tromi1986 1 year ago
better than those new Chinese cars
NewWorldCorp 2 years ago 105
yup i agree much better....
alluminyo 2 years ago 2
it had no air bag, Chinese cars do
lambodude98 2 years ago
@lambodude98 ya but an airbag wont help if the front grille gos through your head
andyass3 2 years ago 3
@lambodude98 hahaha the airbag is a "decoration thing" in those chinese cars
kingeddy137 1 year ago
todo mundo morre kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
higorrodrigues12 2 years ago
RIP!
bbt604 2 years ago
Front end is just gone!
xxxVJ300xxx 2 years ago
the engine is in the back of the VW beetle and the front is the trunk but you could sevive
WedidLandONtheMOON 2 years ago
ese ha de ser de los modelos de fibra de carbono, yo tengo un 83 y es puro fierro al mio no le para eso =D
genesfire 2 years ago
they are Heavy
samuelprn 2 years ago
very safe car!
bmwm5thebest 2 years ago 4
hahahahahaha!
p15able 2 years ago
merked
313foxbody420 2 years ago
Con un buen chapista, ese escarabajo se puede reparar perfectamente, jajajaja.
Que grande el escarabajo.
Que nunca muera.
Si fuera por mi lo seguiría fabricando para algunos. En España se los ve circulando todavía como reliquias.
El coche mas divertido para conducir.
terrahis 2 years ago
no esta mal para ser un auto diseñado en los 40's
proximu 2 years ago
shit!
superskater95 2 years ago
joder q mal che carro se hizo shit DX
banfer92 2 years ago
Tragedia :/
rafigtasa 2 years ago
Oh my goodness ! That's horrible. Thank god that there is a such thing as airbags and hard crumple zones today !
itsjessebouldin 2 years ago
The car has no formal "crumple zone", it was first sold in 1938 mind you. The best they did was install collapsible steering columns.
It does fare better than the VW Microbus, as seen in a video floating around here. That thing just folds like you drove a shoebox into a wall.
FusilliJerry82 2 years ago
Crush zone ends at the engine, like in every normal car :D
WladcaKrakersow 2 years ago
well, uhm, tis car has the engine on the back
llutuv0934 2 years ago 3
legless
alfamonk 2 years ago
the doll is fucked R.I.P doll
lindmark1234 2 years ago 5
What's ironic is that the crush zone is almost half the car yet there's so much crush zone that it dissipates the a lot of energy. Then again, the shitty part is the legs and skull are part of that crush zone, so it's a triple negative.
Ruler2009 2 years ago 2
I think that will buff out.
dave140c 3 years ago 7
I feel sorry for that doll
agnaeus 3 years ago 2
Just like squash house bugs huh?
therealdeal989 3 years ago 3
Yes there are Bugs in Mexico but VW stopped to make it since 2003
llutuv0934 3 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
PLEASE DON'T READ THIS you will die in seven days if you don't post this comment on at least 10 other videos in the next hour, if you do tomorow will be the best day of your life
taxilobo2 3 years ago
I dont know why do you worry, that model is not manufactured anymore :( .... but is ok for a +60 year old technology.
llutuv0934 3 years ago
they stillm ake bugs in Mexico, economy class for the people they are fun, $9'000 usd
luverdude 3 years ago
no, they discontinued in 2003. Interesting, btw, was the fact that the beetle in this crash test was bad, but that the Golf-2 was even worse. For a car designed in 1935, the crash results were not really bad.
Kaefermicha 3 years ago
wow thts death proof.....NOT!
fishey3000 3 years ago
wow that car was a epic crash test PHAIL
mediummastagh3 3 years ago
c'mon this cars has been designed in 1938, and I think is even better than a chinese car...
charlesz3 3 years ago 8
For a car designed in about 1938, that was spectacular.
1972volkswagen 3 years ago 3
*vaya mierda...
thortiyass 3 years ago
en los vw no se vale chocar
ellocomalandro 3 years ago
danger car..
fammiscrivere 3 years ago
Because everybody knows most car accidents are 65 mph straight into a wall...
Actually, the occupants wouldn't have been damaged that much. As you can see the nose was crushed, but the rest of the car is fine.
starbucksmunky 3 years ago
That's because the engine is at the rear of the car, so there's an empty nose that can bend.
UHF43 3 years ago
It looks good for a car that didnt changed too much since times of world war II
llutuv0934 3 years ago
despite its rear engine, it frontal collsion it quite good, the body of this car must b quite tough
tOrqueMonst3RR 3 years ago
dont worry, that'll buff out
LetsBurnSomething 3 years ago 2
id say that bug has just been squashed
DANATRINGWOOD 3 years ago
Oh Damn
CiscoXfi 3 years ago
In 1933, Adolf Hitler submitted sketches to Ferdinand Porsche of a proposed "Volks-Wagen" (the name means "people's car" in German, in which it is pronounced [ˈfolksvagən]), a basic vehicle that should be capable of transporting two adults and three children at a speed of 100 km/h (62 mph).
mastir 3 years ago 3
Hitler was the dreamer and begining concept man of the bug. Thats that. Not the final producer of it but he thought of it!
KiroTheGreat 3 years ago
the engine is in the back, no hot engine in your lap. there is a fuel tank in your lap though.
manykarz 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
That looks pretty safe, with the exception the hot engine is sitting right in your lap but other than that everything looks ok.
afabh 3 years ago
No you fag! If you know ANYTHING about volkswagen its that the engine is in the BACK!!!
73PANTHERS73 3 years ago 8
Well geez, you must be some sort of Volkswagen guru or something...
starbucksmunky 3 years ago
LOL U R A RETARD! xD
Fritz641 3 years ago
I;m sure it was not built or nothing by hitler but yea he thought it and all that stuff. I mean where and when was he gonna build it at the time? lol But yea.
KiroTheGreat 3 years ago
KiroTheGreat= ass!
GMminivans9968 3 years ago
hes fuckin dead
flippyflip6911 3 years ago
No the original design of it was buy hitler your guy may have built it. But hitler desgined it. If you aregue this any more go look it up. Tard
KiroTheGreat 4 years ago
It was hitlers idea to build it, but it was ctually designed by Porsche, as strange as it sounds.
kaltenkirchen24568 3 years ago 3
Not really, hitler made a few rough sketches of what he wanted the peoples car to be like...the final thing was a bit different after porche ferdinand finsished DESIGNING it.
moominmad1337 3 years ago
Wow considering its Age and size thats not bad at all. Thats Hitler's design. Fucking brilliant.
KiroTheGreat 4 years ago 2
was not made by hitler idiot!
was made by Ferdinand Porsche
llutuv0934 4 years ago
Hitler had them made for his arm u dick. thats y at 38 mph the hubs spin like swatsikas. get yo shit straight
73DrtSprt 3 years ago
that looks safe.
id drive that.
spitfire2002 4 years ago 3
my question is, what speed is this bug doing at the moment of the impact????
Juano182 4 years ago
40 mph i guess....
TheCaguama 4 years ago 3
i dont think so...i guess its at least 60mph...its too much damage for such a low speed
Juano182 4 years ago
that's about how much damage there is in today's 40mph tests
PontiacDudeMan 4 years ago
I think it performed very well. Unlike most cars of it's age it managed to handle a crash into a offset object. This is the worse kind of crash test. The door might crumble but the passenger compartment was still intact. The footwells are very open so no plastic dash and supporting arms to crush legs. Poor Herbie!
curranhouse 4 years ago 2
Take a any car -50-60- or -70`s,
Theres no safety at all.
Be careful out there.
kkohouta 4 years ago
yes, but the beetle`s got engine in the back, remember that.
Bigger cars, like volvo and mercedes from 50s to 70s har much more safety than the beetle
badlyhumor 4 years ago
Yep,that`s true. But any car from 50`s-60`s,It is big or not,is not safety at all.
But small car`s like beetle,Anglias escorts,or
anythig else,,Or volvo,M-B,For todays standarts,theres not safety cars.
kkohouta 4 years ago
spitfires are pretty safe. search:
spitfire crash test
on youtube.
spitfire2002 4 years ago
anyone seen those kia and smart crash tests done last year... they did not even get 1star on encap!!! will stick with my volvo though a nice passet would do!!!
checkoutdude 4 years ago
no Herbie!
franklinterrier 4 years ago
it's a 70 year old design
8MunchenBayern8 4 years ago
no airbags =O lol
Turbo856 4 years ago
Bleee Laka MOO Girenamaekal
imbok 4 years ago
>> Sad... but this beetle was better in crash test than all amercian cars in the 70's and 80's
Oh? Where are those crash tests? Or, are you making up a LIE?
orbit9090 4 years ago
I was (and in a way still am) a big fan of the old air-cooled Bug. However, my friend died in one after a crash. The old Bug has the fuel tank in the front of the car, unprotected, and in a metal case that is highly vulnerbale to sparks. The car caught fire immediately after the crash as jorikrademakers says above.
knkav 4 years ago
Not bad, actually. Notice how the cabin remained mostly intact, and that dummy could have walked out of it had he been wearing his seatbelt. Remember, the motor is actually in the back of the vehicle, and the front is mostly empty space, which makes for a very good shock absorber.
perdici0n 4 years ago
Not bad at all for such an old car. If you crashed it into a nearly new ford pickup you would come out better!
ads876689 4 years ago
acctually, it's a 1974 ve beetle, as indicated by the vent behind the rear window, the large round tail lights, and the bumper style.
Oh yeah, i'd rather take my chances in an old aircooled bug any day than be caught dead in a new beetle.
MrCheezeWhizz 4 years ago
acctually, it's a 1974 volkswagen beetle, as indicated by the vents behing the rear window, the large round tail lights, and the bumper style. Oh yeah, and new beetle's blow, i'd rather take my chances in the old aircooled bug anyday, over a new beetle
MrCheezeWhizz 4 years ago
funny....the f-150's crash test was about 20x worse than this...and that car was a 2002 model....
MikeRPritchard 5 years ago 2
no its not its a 70's car a 1302 i think
jorikrademakers 5 years ago
Sad... but this beetle was better in crash test than all amercian cars in the 70's and 80's
maraujo1984 4 years ago 2
yeah they were one of the most safe cars of its time but if you get a crash with it now at high speed youre a dead man for sure we own a couple of them,my dad had a accident with a 1978 1303 the car whas totalled and he was lucky he wasnt wearing his seatbelt because he was trown out of the car the bug exploded 10 seconds after the crash :p kind of funny now i think of it...
jorikrademakers 4 years ago
Hey, it´s a 50´s car.
PenZon 5 years ago
Ouch that VW got owned. Good thing new beetles have a way better crash test.
FFVengeance 5 years ago