Added: 1 year ago
From: UCBerkeleyHaas
Views: 1,052
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (8)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • All of us cannot agree more.

  • Muller is absolutley right about the uncertainty with cloud cover and do manmade co2 contribute to global warming with .2 or .4 degrees? This DOES matter and I want to know. Some smirk from the other panelists isnt good enough i want FACTS

  • The way Muller makes it sound, you'd think it'd be extremely difficult to trace back the divergence problem. In reality, however, it's mentioned several times not only in the literature, but also in the basic textbook I have in front of me (Cronin's Paleoclimates). It's subject to an ongoing debate about the reliability of a certain subset of proxy records. It's disingenuous to imply that this was somehow done in the dark.

  • Professor Rich Muller does not enjoy being told that he is wrong.

  • hide the decline.. sounds like plain english to me.

  • A very informative vid, thank you.

  • THERE'S NO GLOBAL WARMING. that's right NO Global warming..NONE!!!..ZERO!!!

    It's a TOTAL scam?

    Here's a test you can do to discover the truth for yourself.

    Global Warming US Cities Getting Warmer

    /watch?v=F_G_-SdAN04

    This is 100% scientific proof positive. Straight from the horses mouth.

    You simply can't argue with it. Regardless of what any scientists say.

  • Mrs. or Mz. Tom's initial response is interesting. The first thing she does is attack how the emails were obtained. Clearly the scientist where not complying with freedom of information request SO how else would this story have broke?

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more