Part 1 of 13 Rebuttal to Luigi Garlischelli Shroud Forgery

[mssauer]

Nur wenn man sich mit dem Turiner Grabtuch nicht auskennt, glaubt man diesem "hobby" Wissenschafter. Wo sind die 3D Eigenschaften des Abbildes, wie man sie vom Original her kennt? Was ist mit der Tatsache, dass die Blutflecken zuerst auf dem Tuch waren und auf denen der Abdruck unterbrochen ist.

[Flagrum3]

@mssauer Is there anyway you can write this in english? ...Just asking...Thanks.

[mssauer]

Nur wenn man sich mit dem Turiner Grabtuch nicht auskennt, glaubt man diesem "hobby" Wissenschafter. Er hat sämtliche Fakten außer acht gelassen. Wo sind die 3D Eigenschaften des Abbildes, wie man sie vom Original her kennt? Was ist mit der Tatsache, dass die Blutflecken zuerst auf dem Tuch waren und auf denen der Abdruck unterbrochen ist.

[MrSteveSpears]

This presentation is really good, however, it would be much better if he were not so patronizing. I consider it a red flag whenever I hear mockery used to enhance an argument (This seems to indicate a confirmation bias). I was also hoping for a more direct criticism of Garlaschelli's work. But, he does not really get around to it until part 11. Also, it is irrelivant, where Garlaschelli's funding came from (this is refered to as a genetic fallacy in Logic).

[Flagrum3]

@MrSteveSpears It's pretty obvious, he's bias towards the Shroud being real so the mockery maybe comes from his bewilderment of the ridiculous claims made by Garlischelli!....And I would would contest that it does make a huge difference who was behind (monetarily), this fraudulant claim that the Shroud has been reproduced,it proves bias, and raises big questions to the authenticy of the science used.This also proves the MEDIA'S bias in that it broadcast this story without an bit of investigation

[vinnypop]

Garaschelli Shroud is a photoshop fraud of the original put his piece of athiest paid garbage to the test.

[lijkwade]

You can't deny all the facts, the shroud is authentic. Unfortunately most people don't know all the scientific unbiased facts and only read the head lines. As this video says, you can't catch it in a simple one-liner, you have to read all the facts and then you will understand why the shroud has NOT been reproduced. It may look nice on the surface (well, not even that) but even a little closer look already reveals 3 huge mistakes. The shroud of Turin is authentic.

[mrsimtaebin]

garlischelli is a joke.

[condorito29]

amen to that.

do you know what the media's reaction to this bogus "reproduction" REALLY shows?

To me it shows that they are totally SPOOKED by the news that the C-14 tests (on which they had hung ALL their hopes), have now been overturned by Thermochemical Acta and Los Alamos Labs.

There is a bee in MANY people's bonnet nowadays, and its those overturned C14 tests.....

[frost122585]

The most recent issues with the c14 tests are fascinating. I must say the new objections seem totally legit and convincing- not just ot people like myself who have a bias towards belief but even for people who are not Christians at all. So it is entirely possible that the anti-Christ atmosphere is really upset because the c14 test was the only thing that really stood clearly against the shroud's authenticity.