Christina Bellantoni on MSNBC to Discuss President's Approval Rating, Health Care - Part 1

[bigtex501]

Obamer's... 12 DAYS OF CHRISTMAS... 12.. Trillion in Debt 11th.. week of vacation 10.. months of spending 9.. Trillion 10 year budget 8.. percent unemployment? 787.. Billion that did nothing 6.. months a year paying our taxes (2011) 5.. years of taxes before we get health care coverage 4.2.. Trillion budget spending 3.. (total) calls to General McCrystal 2.. Trillion for Health Care and too many LIES to list on YouTube!

[bigtex501]

MERRY CHRISTMAS... From obamer!!!!! Unemployment rate JUMPS from 9.8% (15.1 MILLION) to.... 10.2% (15.7 MILLION) TOTAL UNEMPLOYMENT.... JUMPS from 16.8% to 17.5% of the population or 41.4 MILLION PEOPLE. It's NO WONDER people CAN'T afford health care insurance!!!!! obamer...."oh yeah....AND A HAPPY NEW YEAR!" with a proposed... Cap & Trade TAX (an Average of $3,000 per American!) National Sales TAX (20% on TOP of your current TAXES) And $4 TRILLION in expected spending for 2010!

[DD826]

Anyone can argue the results of any poll. After all, no one is unbias any more.

What no one can dispute is, Obama's approval ratings are on a steady decline.

lol

America enjoy YOUR new president! lol

Ya, Obama is sticking it to America, but you asked for it. lol

[Pleblian]

The Gallup poll has always been the standard since 1935 and always been accepted "unbiased", until recently.

Many critics, today, are accusing Gallup of having a Conservative slant, citing Frank M. Newport of rigging the polling questions.

[brabon1]

the questions are rigged....go to povonline and see how mark evanier was polled on health care and the president

[whoo689]

A SECOND stimulus? Yeah, sure, let's throw MORE money down the drain. What's another trillion among taxpayers?

[brabon1]

bet you have no prob about the billions being shoved down the dual black holes known as iraq and afghanistan

[eric731]

Statistics can be skewed to say almost anything. Look at 0:07 chart. The chart goes from 0 - 70, um, the scale of the chart is off. Did the line of the graph ever go under the 50% line?  It says 49%, but the chart doesn't show that. The chart was scaled in such a way to make the slope of the line look like a small negative number. Another example of bias in the media. How about next time you show as much space on the bottom of the graph as you do on the top of the graph?

[asphyxiafeeling]

i was thinking the exact same thing! that graph was a definitely example of bias!

[bigc028282]

More like 39% at best. It looks like the scientist for "climate change" made this one up.

If you haven't checked the emails that PROVE THE IMF/UN CARBON SCAM, make sure you look. You may become the laughed at idiot soon; like your not already.

[Aaberg123]

Sorry... but you're wrong.