The aerobraking manoever at Jupiter was also shown in the TV movie Space Odyssey: Voyage to the Planets (BBC special). Youtube vid can be seen at youtube URL watch?v=KIL7vUv18yA
@bigdan7489 I have always wondered myself. Her name was Natasha Shneider. Turns out she played keyboard in Queens of the Stone Age. She died in 2008 from Cancer. RIP. Stunning looking women. Amazing what you learn online. :(
If Jupiter could tear apart the Shoemaker-Levy 9 comet into pieces in 1994 then I don't see how the spacecraft could survive passing Jupiter as close as they did
@clonmultcity The spacecraft would not be torn apart because of the angle of entry into the atmosphere. Shoemaker-Levy 9 simply plunged straight in. The Leonov is "skipping" at an oblique angle. Think of it like skipping a stone on the surface of a lake, as oppposed to letting it drop straight down into the water.
You can have a flame without oxygen; vis underwater welding, fusion, etc.
The 2 movies were as different as 2 movies could be. A friend hates 2001 because of the long bits of silence; and 2010 because about a third is in Russian. To me, you don't miss a thing by not understanding most of Helen Mirrens lines (who incidentally also spoke English - she reminds the Americans she is still a pilot in the Russian Air Force).
Remember, 2001 - the book, was a mission to Saturn, not Jupiter.
@899289 They're not in space when the fireball occurs, they're in Jupiter's upper atmosphere. That's the entire premise of the clip. You must have skipped the first thirty seconds.
@899289 They are in the (thin upper) gaseous atmosphere of Jupiter causing them to violently slow down. Think of it as the g-forces you feel when you slam on the brakes in your car. Now put that in slow motion.
never found the film boring at all. it explains enough, yet still leaves sufficient enough unexplained. Now, when will Spielber gdirect the next novel in the series? I wouldn't trust Cameron with it, especially after 'Avatar'.
Here we are, 2010 as we speak. We haven't even returned to the Moon, not to mention setting up a base there or even starting work on an expedition to mars. The whole world would participate in that miracle, but nooooooo. Warrack O'bummer stops it dead at start of project Constellation. Mars has 24h day, 38% Earth's gravity, and an atmosphere of mostly CO2. Of course it will take hundreds or thousand of years to adapt this planet for our colonization, but WTF are we going to start???
@soberek And where are our flying cars already?! I'm spending hours of my life sitting in traffic that shouldn't exist anymore! Scientists need to work harder at keeping up with the half-baked whimsy of popular fiction!
Have you noticed how the production design, set design and cinematography in this film is heavely influenced by Ridley Scott's Alien? You can easily combined both of the films and you wouldn't notice it.
Just noticed that today, upon re-watching the entire movie, myself. Alien, which had debuted 5 years before 2010, re-defined futuristic space ship sets and set the tone design of those sets for years after. It's really sad, too, because there was something elegant and simple, yet sophisticated and futuristic about the set designs for 2001.
just bought 2001 ASO. a haven't watched it since i was very young. such an outstanding movie - the imagery, music, acting are all top notch. don't think i've ever seen this flick - there's another one to pick up!
It's not a fantastic movie and you can definitely notice the difference in cinematographic technique between the two films. 2010 was very much a contemporary movie with significant political and cultural undertones. The contrast between the movie that preceded it by nearly 15 years is stark and leaves this movie feeling...awkward, inelegant, and not nearly as unique or groundbreaking.
True... But I feel like trying to replicate Kubrick would've only ended in disaster. Besides, the books themselves feel very different, with 2001 being philosophical and metaphorical, and 2010 being political and almost religious. The movie nailed the book's feel. And it's one of a very, VERY small group of hard sci-fi movies out there, and it's entertaining and well-acted to boot, so cheers all around.
@DarthFastidious I actually liked "2010" a lot more than the first one. I'm of the somewhat heretical belief that Stanley Kubrick was grossly overrated as a director and that any brilliance he had was a fluke. "2001" could have been pared down to two hours and been just as insightful. The basic story was "Computer goes berserk and kills crew members." Still, it was one of the first Blu-Rays I picked up. It may be boring and obtuse, but it sure as hell looked good.
I remember a cartoon that was titled "2001 for Stupid People." A bunch of people in a movie theater, and on the screen was an ape, with an arrow pointing to a man, with an arrow pointing to the Star Child. And underneath it, "IT'S EVOLUTION, GET IT?" It really isn't all that deep when you cut through all the awe and splendor. An alien intelligence forces evolution for mysterious ends. The end.
Natasha Schneider sure was a beautiful lady! I would have asked them to aerobrake a few more times, just to cuddle with her. Maybe even have the captain call in a "We're-all-gonna-die, have-sex-with-the-closest-person"-call.
I like the special effects!! A lot more realistic than the ones used in StarWars for example!! And there is no sound in space, only when the ship hits the atmosphere!!
Definitely. Here are some other notable deaths in 2008:
Arthur C. Clack (author of 2010), Roy Scheider (starred in 2010), Michael Crichton, Charlton Heston, Paul Newman, Stan Winston (amazing special effects master), and John Phillip Law.
Truly a sad year. They will forever be missed, always be remembered and never replaced. RIP
Warner Bros. needs to get off their ass and give us a definitive copy of this movie, preferrably on Blu-Ray! This movie has never had a decent film version in the US.
The best copy I've seen of it was the Japanese collector's edition Laserdisc I used to own.
I always figured, if this sequel had been made today, this scene would have Lloyd's character having some hot steamy panic-sex with that russian chick. ^.^
I haven't seen this film for a while. Though it still seems rather concrete compared to Kubrick, for a major American movie during the Cold War to set a film on a SOVIET spacecraft took uncommon guts. Respect, Peter Hyams.
you have a point, considering what happened to Shumacker-Levy 9. Jupiter would be dangerous to pull a stunt like this due to the increased gravity and tidal forces. think they were talking about skipping off jupiters atmosphere to slow down. Bad Idea. Now a slingshot for a return trajectory, no problem.
um yeah considering we should have had a base on the moon in the 80's, on to mars in the 90's and yeah out to jupiter by 2000's but government cutbacks and 2 shuttle disasters have cut the space program off at the knees due to nasa's missmanagement and corner-cutting. Speaking of the movie, Love that little hot Russian chick hangin with Roy in the Braking maneuver.
Question: base on the moon in the 80s, mars, 90s, jupiter, 2000s... etc. You mean, in fiction or in real life? I mean, what you are talking about are real plans that Nasa, or any other space agencie had, or fiction you read in books and-or saw in movies?
That was the original prognosis, and what they based the 2001 movie on. This was the assessment made when they made the 2001 book and movie. And that assessment was not wrong, but nasa didn't do enough to keep the public interested and so funding was cut, and the bigger projects and stuff had to take a back seat. the nasa budget should be as much if not more than we spend on national security. if it was we would already be there.
During their space walk in the film when they get to Io to board discovery they're only allowed to stay outside for 15 minutes because of the radiation. They do make some mention of it.
Zenia is her name and she is one of the medical officers. In the book, they actually share a suspended sleeping cocoon during the maneuver, and in the whole "we might both die a firey death at any second" heat of the moment, Arthur C. Clarke describes how Floyd definitely feels the sexual tension.
They don't do it in the book, unfortunately; Floyd being married and all. Still, If I were in his place I would have said das vdanya (sic) to all Earthly worries and cares and found out if what Paul McCartney sang about Ukraine and Moscow girls was true or not.
In the book Zenia actually hooks up with Max (who does not die at the Monolith as in the movie), and they get married.
Did you ever consider the aerodynamic affects of the 'ballute'? Perhaps there was a stronger low pressure area on that hemisphere of the ballute array?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
In reality, all of these people would have died had their ship really been on fire like that ala Space shuttle a few years ago which burnt up on re-entry.
One could say this forshadows the Galileo atmospheric probe's arrival in December 1995 (11 years after this movie came out!). Of course, THAT mission was a one-way ticket into Jupiter itself.
yes they should have kept with tradition concerning the sound, there is no sound in space. but this is a movie, and futhermore a movie not directed by stanley kubrick.
Well, there's also a practical reason why they used sound--Dolby Stereo optical may have lower noise, but it's not completely silent :) They had to do something to justify such elaborate sound design.
One thing you might wqant to consider, as an explanation is that the voice doing the count-down to the error-braking maneuver is actually the male crew-member on the bridge, not the ship's computer. We never hear the Leonov's computer speak, ever.
Ok I can buy that... but then why is the Russian guy speaking English when only one person on board speaks it as a first language? The girl that comes in with Schnider doesn't speak any at all!
Dr. Floyd wasn't the only English speaker in the crew. His two fellow American crew members were Dr. Chandra (played by Bob Balaban)and Dr. Walter Curnow (played by John Lithgow). Granted, those two are still in hibernation at this point in the movie, but the public announcements may have been in English for that reason. Also, this a Hollywood movie we're talking about.... ;). Have you seen the whole movie ever?
Actually yes, there is swirls of dust when something lands on the moon. Its from the thrust from the engines when it hits the dust - it doesn't spray out evenly due to an irregular surface which causes the swirls. It doesn't NEED air to do that.
no, 2001 did not looked more real then the real footage.
For example, when the ship land on the moon, there are swirls of dust. Obviously, there is no air on the moon, so there are no swirls of dust. Dust on the moon fly on perfect ballistic trajectories, just as it happens on the real moon landings videos :)
I cry too, My mom is a perfect artist and is making some paintings of my choise clips from the movie.
Such as the ending of 2010 the monolith on europa.
The Moon base view of the monolith in the dug out.
If you interested let me know, I have the pics saved in email for her to paint. I can send you them or one of your own choices. Let me know. It is good having human relationships on Youtube. Hal voice....
We will have to subscribe to each other and we can privately email.
This film seemed to show the boundaries of our technologies really well making it a believable experience. 2001 was the same. Still cant believe the 2001 movie was made a year before man landed on the moon! 2001 looked more believable than the moon landing footage :-)
Aerobraking looks kind of extreme. Maybe we should include it for the Summer X-Games.
3forte 3 months ago
Chekov from Star Trek: Look at that Wessel go
smittyshawn 4 months ago
The aerobraking manoever at Jupiter was also shown in the TV movie Space Odyssey: Voyage to the Planets (BBC special). Youtube vid can be seen at youtube URL watch?v=KIL7vUv18yA
dtvjho 6 months ago
i like it more than 2001..... but both are great movies
TheTrancer85 7 months ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
Awesome Special effects.
DarthHater100 8 months ago
3:47 to 3:50 are probably the coolest three seconds EVER in film.
steveb0503 8 months ago 2
Friction + Hydrogen = WHOOSH!
phuturephunk 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@phuturephunk "Friction + Hydrogen = WHOOSH!"
you need some oxygene to "whoosh"... :-)
H123Laci 6 months ago
@phuturephunk Not without the proper proportions of oxygen.
Binky40SW 5 months ago
Can anyone tell me what the name of that girl that is accompanying the doctor? She's f'n hott!!!
bigdan7489 10 months ago
@bigdan7489 I have always wondered myself. Her name was Natasha Shneider. Turns out she played keyboard in Queens of the Stone Age. She died in 2008 from Cancer. RIP. Stunning looking women. Amazing what you learn online. :(
TheREALSisko 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It's a science fiction film.............
ninepin75 11 months ago
If Jupiter could tear apart the Shoemaker-Levy 9 comet into pieces in 1994 then I don't see how the spacecraft could survive passing Jupiter as close as they did
clonmultcity 1 year ago
@clonmultcity The spacecraft would not be torn apart because of the angle of entry into the atmosphere. Shoemaker-Levy 9 simply plunged straight in. The Leonov is "skipping" at an oblique angle. Think of it like skipping a stone on the surface of a lake, as oppposed to letting it drop straight down into the water.
logandarklighter 9 months ago
my underwear would've been so brown if i was there
ishouldplayzelda 1 year ago
"The Leonov," one of my favorite SF spacecraft. Dree, dava, adeem!
WC3POchannel10A 1 year ago
You can have a flame without oxygen; vis underwater welding, fusion, etc.
The 2 movies were as different as 2 movies could be. A friend hates 2001 because of the long bits of silence; and 2010 because about a third is in Russian. To me, you don't miss a thing by not understanding most of Helen Mirrens lines (who incidentally also spoke English - she reminds the Americans she is still a pilot in the Russian Air Force).
Remember, 2001 - the book, was a mission to Saturn, not Jupiter.
brett201777 1 year ago
I thought 2010 was so much better than 2001. Am I the only on who can see the emperor is naked?!
DarthHater100 1 year ago 6
@DarthHater100 Not at all -
2001 book > movie
2010 movie > book (except Europa encounter)
2010 movie > 2001 movie
steveb0503 8 months ago
No oxygenin space to cause the fireball like that. At least the Russian girl is cute.
899289 1 year ago
@899289 They're not in space when the fireball occurs, they're in Jupiter's upper atmosphere. That's the entire premise of the clip. You must have skipped the first thirty seconds.
poisonhemlock 1 year ago
@899289 They are in the (thin upper) gaseous atmosphere of Jupiter causing them to violently slow down. Think of it as the g-forces you feel when you slam on the brakes in your car. Now put that in slow motion.
Chuckjagermeister 1 year ago
never found the film boring at all. it explains enough, yet still leaves sufficient enough unexplained. Now, when will Spielber gdirect the next novel in the series? I wouldn't trust Cameron with it, especially after 'Avatar'.
TheChapaqua 1 year ago 2
love to have a schmoke in that control room/cockpit .. pretty colour lights and i can deploy airbags!
gyrovague 1 year ago
Comment removed
soberek 1 year ago
Here we are, 2010 as we speak. We haven't even returned to the Moon, not to mention setting up a base there or even starting work on an expedition to mars. The whole world would participate in that miracle, but nooooooo. Warrack O'bummer stops it dead at start of project Constellation. Mars has 24h day, 38% Earth's gravity, and an atmosphere of mostly CO2. Of course it will take hundreds or thousand of years to adapt this planet for our colonization, but WTF are we going to start???
soberek 1 year ago
@soberek And where are our flying cars already?! I'm spending hours of my life sitting in traffic that shouldn't exist anymore! Scientists need to work harder at keeping up with the half-baked whimsy of popular fiction!
poisonhemlock 1 year ago
Ugh! They added sound in space!
brewskhee 1 year ago
Well, it's 2010 now. Hope we "make contact" this year.
ancalites 1 year ago
it was Aliens!!
ighforever 2 years ago
going Aerobraking looks like fun !!!
hardrockinsteve123 2 years ago
One of these essential must read books ...:
t i n y u r l (dot) com/essentialbooks
Forewarned, forearmed.
ausseratem 2 years ago
They dont make real sci fi movies anymore.
myironlungca 2 years ago
"aerobraking" is spelled just like this: "aerobraking", just as in "aerodynamics", "aerospace", and "aeronautical" !! Get with it and fox it!
europamoon100 2 years ago
my apologies for adding a space! I will correct it :-)
manicminer2010 2 years ago
@europamoon100 fox it? :O
TheREALSisko 1 month ago
Have you noticed how the production design, set design and cinematography in this film is heavely influenced by Ridley Scott's Alien? You can easily combined both of the films and you wouldn't notice it.
willyjoel 2 years ago
Just noticed that today, upon re-watching the entire movie, myself. Alien, which had debuted 5 years before 2010, re-defined futuristic space ship sets and set the tone design of those sets for years after. It's really sad, too, because there was something elegant and simple, yet sophisticated and futuristic about the set designs for 2001.
Roboboy 2 years ago
All the films are SCIENCE FICTION, and badly dated at that.
Doctadeth 2 years ago
pink floyd track to go with this scene is One Of These Days ,
jmm1233 2 years ago
Roy Scheider was so well casted for this film thanks for the post!
G4MOF 2 years ago 3
just bought 2001 ASO. a haven't watched it since i was very young. such an outstanding movie - the imagery, music, acting are all top notch. don't think i've ever seen this flick - there's another one to pick up!
EMG33 2 years ago
It's not a fantastic movie and you can definitely notice the difference in cinematographic technique between the two films. 2010 was very much a contemporary movie with significant political and cultural undertones. The contrast between the movie that preceded it by nearly 15 years is stark and leaves this movie feeling...awkward, inelegant, and not nearly as unique or groundbreaking.
Roboboy 2 years ago
True... But I feel like trying to replicate Kubrick would've only ended in disaster. Besides, the books themselves feel very different, with 2001 being philosophical and metaphorical, and 2010 being political and almost religious. The movie nailed the book's feel. And it's one of a very, VERY small group of hard sci-fi movies out there, and it's entertaining and well-acted to boot, so cheers all around.
DarthFastidious 2 years ago 19
@DarthFastidious I actually liked "2010" a lot more than the first one. I'm of the somewhat heretical belief that Stanley Kubrick was grossly overrated as a director and that any brilliance he had was a fluke. "2001" could have been pared down to two hours and been just as insightful. The basic story was "Computer goes berserk and kills crew members." Still, it was one of the first Blu-Rays I picked up. It may be boring and obtuse, but it sure as hell looked good.
cubdukat 1 year ago
@cubdukat
I remember a cartoon that was titled "2001 for Stupid People." A bunch of people in a movie theater, and on the screen was an ape, with an arrow pointing to a man, with an arrow pointing to the Star Child. And underneath it, "IT'S EVOLUTION, GET IT?" It really isn't all that deep when you cut through all the awe and splendor. An alien intelligence forces evolution for mysterious ends. The end.
I always liked 2010 better, as well.
DarthFastidious 1 year ago
Natasha Schneider sure was a beautiful lady! I would have asked them to aerobrake a few more times, just to cuddle with her. Maybe even have the captain call in a "We're-all-gonna-die, have-sex-with-the-closest-person"-call.
canova1832 2 years ago 5
Zenia was terrified and needed someone other than her countryman to be with
Doctadeth 2 years ago
Helen Mirren's Russian is so excellent!
imjunipernow 3 years ago
The fact that she was born Ilyena Vasilievna Mironov might have something to do with that...
AndiJF 2 years ago 2
A shame they don't make such movies no more.
Pure viewing pleasure.
DakotaHarris84 3 years ago
RIP Peter Hyams(film career at least)
a Sound of Thunder was mindblowing..ha
scrambuild 3 years ago 2
Don't forget "Stay Tuned" with John Ritter.
justinaurelius 3 years ago
If it would, prove so otherwise.
rixille 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This is silly, a bunch of ballons wouldn't stop the ship...
rixille 3 years ago
lol the balloons arent there to slow the ship down lol .....
monkpkey 3 years ago 2
You might like to check out the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, which used aerobraking to enter Mars orbit.
tragiccarpet 3 years ago 2
the book is surreal , when discovery is hit by radiation and destroyed the ghost of hal and bowman whatch it fall to pieces, trippy.
TURBODORK2 3 years ago
Turbodork2, Oh I wish they had included that scene in the film! :/
dominokat07 3 years ago
that would been cool, shame about discovery
TURBODORK2 3 years ago
I like the special effects!! A lot more realistic than the ones used in StarWars for example!! And there is no sound in space, only when the ship hits the atmosphere!!
AlexF1508 3 years ago 5
talk about havin ur balls in your throat!
HipHopJun 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
most pointless sequel ever. Nice scene though.
hairhorn 3 years ago
RIP Roy Scheider.
CMONTHETON 3 years ago 17
RIP Natasha Shneider
porsche911sbs 3 years ago 2
Well, Natascha Schneider, but yes. One of the saddest losses of 2008.
teaflax 3 years ago
Definitely. Here are some other notable deaths in 2008:
Arthur C. Clack (author of 2010), Roy Scheider (starred in 2010), Michael Crichton, Charlton Heston, Paul Newman, Stan Winston (amazing special effects master), and John Phillip Law.
Truly a sad year. They will forever be missed, always be remembered and never replaced. RIP
bournedevinesupreme 3 years ago 2
Stan Winston worked on 2010? I did not know that.
cubdukat 2 years ago
@CMONTHETON RIP Roy Scheider and Natasha Shneider.
soberek 1 year ago
what for a ride :)
takezo1977 3 years ago
Warner Bros. needs to get off their ass and give us a definitive copy of this movie, preferrably on Blu-Ray! This movie has never had a decent film version in the US.
The best copy I've seen of it was the Japanese collector's edition Laserdisc I used to own.
cubdukat 3 years ago
Dang, Roy Schieder had a chance to join the Billion Mile High Club!
yellowwing 3 years ago
I always figured, if this sequel had been made today, this scene would have Lloyd's character having some hot steamy panic-sex with that russian chick. ^.^
dominokat07 3 years ago 2
actually she's dead so :(
google Natasha Shneider.
Aegrim 3 years ago
lol that would be awesome and a shame at the same time
stopfederalism08 3 years ago
it looks like helen mirren is having an orgasm in this scene.
bstep13 4 years ago 3
somethings supposed to happen in the last scene. what happens
joshscott911 4 years ago
Di anyone notice in this film the Co-Pilot of the leanov is the spitting image of Roy Schider.
I always thought they were related.
RustiSwordz 4 years ago
RIP Roy Scheider.
bstep13 4 years ago 5
this was better than the 1st movie.
even tho the 1st was very gud.
though this was on the money moviewise.
mohanicus 4 years ago
I haven't seen this film for a while. Though it still seems rather concrete compared to Kubrick, for a major American movie during the Cold War to set a film on a SOVIET spacecraft took uncommon guts. Respect, Peter Hyams.
barnard1960 4 years ago 2
Sure, in a sci-fi movie the timeline is shorter, like in any other movie, otherwise every scene would last hours.
But anyway, I love Space Odyssey, and I watch 2001 and 2010 every month!
throttlelever 4 years ago 3
This is my favorite part of the movie. You get a true sense of fear and worry if the characters are going to make it or not. Thanks for posting! :-D
SynaMax 4 years ago
Thank god they made it, i watched it before, but
now i thought they wouldn't, you scared me!
InfoSasha 4 years ago
The sky is falling, the sky is falling, communicators wee impossible, flight was impossible, but guys only you are impossible.
paacki 4 years ago
The PlanetX theory to me is mainly most liklely not to happen in my opinion but hey.. one has to keep an open mind..
drummerboi8 4 years ago
I still say they would be dead.You cannot speak for this because it's not a reality. Dream and wish all you want.
madamecarroll 4 years ago
you have a point, considering what happened to Shumacker-Levy 9. Jupiter would be dangerous to pull a stunt like this due to the increased gravity and tidal forces. think they were talking about skipping off jupiters atmosphere to slow down. Bad Idea. Now a slingshot for a return trajectory, no problem.
LordBicen 4 years ago
Technically speaking, that maneuver would be called aerocapture.
Andy120290Returns 4 years ago
so, for 2010 we should be reaching jupiter...
pedroetcr 4 years ago
um yeah considering we should have had a base on the moon in the 80's, on to mars in the 90's and yeah out to jupiter by 2000's but government cutbacks and 2 shuttle disasters have cut the space program off at the knees due to nasa's missmanagement and corner-cutting. Speaking of the movie, Love that little hot Russian chick hangin with Roy in the Braking maneuver.
LordBicen 4 years ago
Question: base on the moon in the 80s, mars, 90s, jupiter, 2000s... etc. You mean, in fiction or in real life? I mean, what you are talking about are real plans that Nasa, or any other space agencie had, or fiction you read in books and-or saw in movies?
Just a question, good comment, thought!!!
pedroetcr 4 years ago
That was the original prognosis, and what they based the 2001 movie on. This was the assessment made when they made the 2001 book and movie. And that assessment was not wrong, but nasa didn't do enough to keep the public interested and so funding was cut, and the bigger projects and stuff had to take a back seat. the nasa budget should be as much if not more than we spend on national security. if it was we would already be there.
LordBicen 4 years ago
It was Richard M. Nixon who killed it. Actually, he wasn't even going to permit the development of the Shuttle or even fund the Voyager probes!
Anyway, a manned mission to Jupiter would be problematic. The radiation in the vicinity of Io is lethal.
El135o 4 years ago
During their space walk in the film when they get to Io to board discovery they're only allowed to stay outside for 15 minutes because of the radiation. They do make some mention of it.
tfcdomprice 3 years ago
Zenia is her name and she is one of the medical officers. In the book, they actually share a suspended sleeping cocoon during the maneuver, and in the whole "we might both die a firey death at any second" heat of the moment, Arthur C. Clarke describes how Floyd definitely feels the sexual tension.
fox2mike28 4 years ago
Meow!
LordBicen 4 years ago
They don't do it in the book, unfortunately; Floyd being married and all. Still, If I were in his place I would have said das vdanya (sic) to all Earthly worries and cares and found out if what Paul McCartney sang about Ukraine and Moscow girls was true or not.
In the book Zenia actually hooks up with Max (who does not die at the Monolith as in the movie), and they get married.
fox2mike28 4 years ago
yeah they had to change a few things to make the movie more dramatic and mysterious.
LordBicen 4 years ago
Have you notice that in this sequence the fire goes down? Yes, yes, Jupiter´s gravity. But it´s an error ^^. Wonderful movie though
Rabastan 4 years ago
Did you ever consider the aerodynamic affects of the 'ballute'? Perhaps there was a stronger low pressure area on that hemisphere of the ballute array?
Simple math people.
spencnaz 4 years ago
Ehhhhh, I don´t think so. It´s more likely a mistake.
Rabastan 4 years ago
wow
jucamo007 4 years ago
Glory to God in the highest! That was incredible!
bookstar77 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
In reality, all of these people would have died had their ship really been on fire like that ala Space shuttle a few years ago which burnt up on re-entry.
madamecarroll 4 years ago
You have no concept of ablative shielding and thermodynamics.
spencnaz 4 years ago
We DO need a concept of Jupiter's powerful radiation field and gravity. The planet is 318 times as massive and 1,000 times the size of Earth.
'Aerobraking' around Jupiter would take HOURS.
El135o 4 years ago 3
that would be a boring moment in thismovie ;)
Robfoxman 4 years ago 4
One could say this forshadows the Galileo atmospheric probe's arrival in December 1995 (11 years after this movie came out!). Of course, THAT mission was a one-way ticket into Jupiter itself.
thirdclass2006 4 years ago
I love both movies, but neither makes any sense to me. I do think the special effects helped inspire Star Trek the Motion Picture.
peterparker12 4 years ago
yes they should have kept with tradition concerning the sound, there is no sound in space. but this is a movie, and futhermore a movie not directed by stanley kubrick.
sausageslaps 4 years ago
Well, there's also a practical reason why they used sound--Dolby Stereo optical may have lower noise, but it's not completely silent :) They had to do something to justify such elaborate sound design.
cubdukat 3 years ago
haha :)
giblo 4 years ago
great movie but.... why is the computer voice on a Russian spacecraft speaking in English?
quietearthMT 4 years ago
One thing you might wqant to consider, as an explanation is that the voice doing the count-down to the error-braking maneuver is actually the male crew-member on the bridge, not the ship's computer. We never hear the Leonov's computer speak, ever.
DavidChipman 4 years ago
Ok I can buy that... but then why is the Russian guy speaking English when only one person on board speaks it as a first language? The girl that comes in with Schnider doesn't speak any at all!
quietearthMT 4 years ago
Dr. Floyd wasn't the only English speaker in the crew. His two fellow American crew members were Dr. Chandra (played by Bob Balaban)and Dr. Walter Curnow (played by John Lithgow). Granted, those two are still in hibernation at this point in the movie, but the public announcements may have been in English for that reason. Also, this a Hollywood movie we're talking about.... ;). Have you seen the whole movie ever?
DavidChipman 3 years ago
@DavidChipman The announcements may have been an intercom announcement for Dr Floyd's benefit, so he knew what to expect and when to hold on.
Binky40SW 5 months ago
the sound of the space ship fireballing through space is both unnecessary and scientifically inaccurate.
intigfx 4 years ago
c'mon, we're talking about a movie where jupiter becomes a star thanx to million of giant space monolits :-)
kashpd 4 years ago
well, the previous movie with space monoliths had no sound in space :)
intigfx 4 years ago
they were flying through atmosphere hence the fire and the sound.
no excuse for the other sounds though.
maltwo 4 years ago
Actually yes, there is swirls of dust when something lands on the moon. Its from the thrust from the engines when it hits the dust - it doesn't spray out evenly due to an irregular surface which causes the swirls. It doesn't NEED air to do that.
Barricade 4 years ago
No, it doesn't swirl. It simply sprays out. You can see this in the landing footage of Apollo 11.
thirdclass2006 4 years ago
no, 2001 did not looked more real then the real footage.
For example, when the ship land on the moon, there are swirls of dust. Obviously, there is no air on the moon, so there are no swirls of dust. Dust on the moon fly on perfect ballistic trajectories, just as it happens on the real moon landings videos :)
I love 2001 btw. I cry everytime I see it.
rogerpenna 4 years ago
I cry too, My mom is a perfect artist and is making some paintings of my choise clips from the movie.
Such as the ending of 2010 the monolith on europa.
The Moon base view of the monolith in the dug out.
If you interested let me know, I have the pics saved in email for her to paint. I can send you them or one of your own choices. Let me know. It is good having human relationships on Youtube. Hal voice....
We will have to subscribe to each other and we can privately email.
ahole6 4 years ago
This film seemed to show the boundaries of our technologies really well making it a believable experience. 2001 was the same. Still cant believe the 2001 movie was made a year before man landed on the moon! 2001 looked more believable than the moon landing footage :-)
manicminer2010 4 years ago
I wouldn't call it more "believable".
More beautiful is more how I'd describe it, thanks to film processing.
thirdclass2006 4 years ago
I want to see this movie.
MountainDeW06 4 years ago
CAPTAIN BRIDGER!!! OMG!
trueedge2097 4 years ago
Roy Scheider is like: "Was it good for you, too?"
selby06 4 years ago
You know that ship looks alot like an earth destroyer from Babylon 5?
spectre111 4 years ago
yup, ive never had any doubt that the Earth Force Destroyers were modelled on that ship. Earth Force Destroyers look meaner though :p
locutus12 4 years ago
JMS outright admitted at the end of Babylon 5 that the Omega class Destroyer was a tribute to the Leonov design.
Barricade 4 years ago
Foil bags are a wonderful braking device. So simple. They are reflective and insulatory.
smillar98 5 years ago