Even if dinosaurs were still alive, how would this be going against evolution? Also, radioactive dating down by thousands of scientists, you need evidence they are wrong. In Genisis, it says 7 day creation, but when a lot of metiphores are in Bible, why should this not be? It could be millions of years and just 7 important times. Also, God wants people to believe in him, not give them science. It was hard enough to convince someone of God, billions of years would be harder back then.
behemith could be a elephant. (Disprove it from bible). When bible says tail, original scripture could have said end, meaning trunk. Leviathan could be crocodiles. (also disprove from bible). They have armor, powerful jaws, and shiny eyes. dragons could also be crocodiles. wings and fire were added latter. Why do you instintly think dino when you hear big?
You know what? I think that that creature might possibly be a Saltasaurus. Now, the dead carcass was described as having a long neck, and, yet, being armoured, at the exact same time. Now, Saltasaurus was very long-necked, just like other sauropods, but, being a titanosaur, it is believed to have sported bodily armour. And, didn't this sighting also take place, in South America? Well, Saltasaurus did live, in South America, Folks! Not sure about 2 heads, though. But, it's still a mutated Salto.
Mmm-hmmm. *Sarcasm-Mode*: "Yeah, sure, all dinosaurs are extinct!". But, no, seriously, here, you have got EVEN MORE evidence, that the dinosaurs never died out, and that they are, indeed, still alive, today! Yeah! Now, Up-Top! Go, Living Dinos! YaaaaaaY! Razz! :)!
@gregrutz Uhhhh. Are you implying the the Bible is saying that the power of behemoth comes from his belly button? You will have to try much harder. Navel also is used to define the center of something-for example, a wheel or center of a geographical location.
I am a living fossil researcher and discover. [a, paleostitiszoologist, "the science of ancient surviving animals"]. I know from first hand, international, field experience, within my profession, that Dr. Hovind is absolutely right, and that there really are living dinosaurs that have survived their presumed extinction by science. I have personally encountered, seen, and studied, living dinosaurs in the field, myself.. It is time to change our postion about species extinction and evolution!
Why would a large reptile, even a dinosaur, prove anything for religion? It does nothing to refute anything on evolution... I'm sort of left scratching my head here.
Dinosaurs might have lived after the fall of the comet that almost got them extinct. They might have lived to recent times, not got extinct millions of years ago, but recent might be meant to be 10000years ago or more..maybe ye, man (anscestors) saw dinosaurs, hoowever some say 10k BC there was an ice age, maybe that finished dinosaurs off..maybe there was a lockness 700 years ago, However, there are sure no dinos now..especially with so much pollution and exploration, if there are theyre sneaky
Argh. This guy is so annoying. He seems to think that if dinosaurs are still alive today, it debunks evolution. I'm still not sure why he thinks this will give creationists credibility.
"Darwin says he thinks many species might have evolved from simple organisms" and on this "evidence" we teach presumption as scientific fact to all the impressionable school kids
Yes but you forgot to mention the evidence for evolution, from fossil, to geologic, to taxonomic, to genetic, to observed evolution and speciation. You're curious to learn what evolution science really says. I congratulate you for being curious enough to ask me!
"observed evolution" !!!! haha...excuse me while i get up from rolling on the floor laughing. i suppose you are referring to some moths of different color, or birds that "adapt" and "evolve"....but you know what? a dog is a dog, a cat is a cat, a moth is a moth, and NOTHING has ever been observed changing into something else. as to the rest of your claims, there is zero evidence for evolution. period.
Scientists can figure out how something happened without observing it directly, dummy. We know pluto orbits our sun and takes 250 years to complete 1 revolution, even though no one has ever witnessed pluto do this. Understand? No, of course you don't!
if nobody has ever seen pluto orbit the sun, then how would we "know" a damn thing about it? scientists can take guesses at how something happened without observing it directly. this applies to any postulation about the history of earth past human record....duh.
well, with your vast knowledge of how things work that can't be observed, why don't you figure out how to control gravity and generate free electricity? if i'm a dummy, what does that infer about your mental abilities, you imbecile?
@karnoch thank you. some people always forget that charles darwin made a theory that everything that is was once was a simpler form. macro and micro evolution is 2 differnt things! a voyage and study session does not prove any evolution theory.
And please, do not be ashamed to ask me what evolution science actually says. I haven't met a creationist yet who has the slightest idea what the theory actually says. So do not feel like you're the only one!
i am fairly certain YOU don't have the slightest idea what the so-called "theory of evolution" says either. and just to point out, it isn't a theory, or even a testable hypothesis. so much for your scientific method...
sigh....ok, let's do this. actually, the bible does support the occurance of an ice age. it happened after the flood, due to the rapid cooling of our atmosphere since we no longer had the cloud cover that was there pre-flood. secondly....pay attention....EVOLUTION IS NOT A THEORY. that's right, find a grade school science book and read about the scientific method. first comes an observation, then comes a hypothesis to explain it, then, if experiments support it, it can be called a theory.
@karnoch nope- wrong...if experiments DON'T prove the hypothesis wrong, THEN it may become theory after a great number of re-testings by the scientific community, a technical- but vital difference than the process you speak of, otherwise experiments could be designed to support the hypothesis, and you see the folly there, of course...
That last photo of the snake is a fake. The kid cut the snake open and crawled inside (weirdo). Why, then, isn't the media all over this. There can't be that big of a conspiracy. How often do people find bones and fleshy carcasses of dinosaurs. And how often do people find human remains preserved in solid rock. Face it. Because the Bible doesn't mention evolution, doesn't mean that it wasn't one of "God's tools". The Bible doesn't mention many things that are real.
No I am sorry. I have a hard time believing the snake's jaws could have made it past his shoulders. I saw a monster quest episode about giant snakes. This photo was brought up and examined only to be declared very doctored.
this is totally the truth, how are people so blind into believing a fairy tale(evolution) and completely deny the scientific FACTS here? and for redgreennerd, he's in prison because he refused to pay taxes because that is against his beliefs. and is frankly, against mine.
@artem1002 this is not scientific fact, this famous creature has not been found, like lochness many people claim to see it yet not evidence to prove it. drawings dont count. you'd think with todays technology someone exploring would have caught this on tape by now. crocs and few others are surviving dinosaurs but the vast majority are extinct! a trex and mammoth did not live in the same time period. shit how would we be alive now if we coexisted with such predators
2 Thessalonians 2: he will send them strong dillusion so that they would believe the lie. God is basically saying, I told you the truth, you had your chance to believe it but you chose to believe Satan, fine, here's strong dillusion which will get you the same fate as Satan. This is why no matter how much proof there is to support the Bible, atheists are just convinced they're right cus their dillusion is extremely strong, coming from God himself.
Possibly because you're unwilling to admit that you make mistakes and don't want to have to answer to them to a REAL authority figure (*coughnotDarwincough*).
Wow, look how FAR I'm getting being an ASS to someone and being COMPLETELY SARCASTIC HERE. Because that's DEFINITELY WHAT CONVINCES PEOPLE, when you treat them like the IDIOTS THEY ARE.
Great vid, does anybody have his contact info? Or was that in the video and I just missed it? *goes to watch again*
Okay first of all: I'm not a man of any age. Second of all, you're probably at least 6 years younger than I am like most of the people here that call themselves adults. Third of all: what kind of "man of god" can't at least capitalize God and Christ? Not saying that's necessary for any sort of Christianhood but I'd be a bit disappointed if I wrote to my pastor and he responded in chatspeak.
Fourth of all, you should know that there's not a Christian in the world that hasn't lost an argument.
ok first of all , i am probably 12 years older than you. second of all gods name dose not need to be capitalized . third of all , i have been a pastor for 20 years and i have never made a bad argument or said anything that our loving god disaproves of.
fourth of all, i am the voice of god. you know that i have never lost an argument nor is it possible.
that bronto on 1:28 looks like a rhino
animaljp3 1 month ago
Even if dinosaurs were still alive, how would this be going against evolution? Also, radioactive dating down by thousands of scientists, you need evidence they are wrong. In Genisis, it says 7 day creation, but when a lot of metiphores are in Bible, why should this not be? It could be millions of years and just 7 important times. Also, God wants people to believe in him, not give them science. It was hard enough to convince someone of God, billions of years would be harder back then.
animaljp3 1 month ago
behemith could be a elephant. (Disprove it from bible). When bible says tail, original scripture could have said end, meaning trunk. Leviathan could be crocodiles. (also disprove from bible). They have armor, powerful jaws, and shiny eyes. dragons could also be crocodiles. wings and fire were added latter. Why do you instintly think dino when you hear big?
animaljp3 1 month ago
Is mental retardation a prerequsit to become a christian ?
SuperAgnostic1 2 months ago
Nut case. Once you hear him talk about the bible, you know it's bullshit.
gcwbr1 8 months ago
You know what? I think that that creature might possibly be a Saltasaurus. Now, the dead carcass was described as having a long neck, and, yet, being armoured, at the exact same time. Now, Saltasaurus was very long-necked, just like other sauropods, but, being a titanosaur, it is believed to have sported bodily armour. And, didn't this sighting also take place, in South America? Well, Saltasaurus did live, in South America, Folks! Not sure about 2 heads, though. But, it's still a mutated Salto.
Utahraptor2003 8 months ago
Mmm-hmmm. *Sarcasm-Mode*: "Yeah, sure, all dinosaurs are extinct!". But, no, seriously, here, you have got EVEN MORE evidence, that the dinosaurs never died out, and that they are, indeed, still alive, today! Yeah! Now, Up-Top! Go, Living Dinos! YaaaaaaY! Razz! :)!
Utahraptor2003 8 months ago
JOB 40:
15 Behold now behemoth
16 His strength is in his loins and his force is in the navel of his belly.
Dinosaurs come from eggs, THEY DON’T HAVE NAVELS.
gregrutz 11 months ago
@gregrutz Uhhhh. Are you implying the the Bible is saying that the power of behemoth comes from his belly button? You will have to try much harder. Navel also is used to define the center of something-for example, a wheel or center of a geographical location.
numberourdays 8 months ago
@numberourdays The power of my car goes through the navel of the tires. Do creationists talk like that?
Dinosaurs did not live with man, where is your evidence Kent.
gregrutz 8 months ago
@gregrutz how do you know caetoon boy?????????you seenone?????if not shut yerhole
thoostorm4 2 days ago
@thoostorm4 I went to college and studied science, you should try getting an education too.
Dinosaurs lived and changed for 160 million years, fact.
The big ones died off 65 million years ago, fact.
The little ones with feathers are still everywhere. Fact.
gregrutz 2 days ago
thats impossibal how could the dino's survive the iceage
LeonardoYokhana 1 year ago
DNA evidence proves this guy wrong..
RockLIFE001 1 year ago
You are a fucking idiot if you believe this fucking garbage.
MagusGod 1 year ago
Inca stones are stones are fake or not ?
If it fake how the farmer get a ideas to drawn dinosaurs.
Famers never know about dinosaurs in inca.
this will murder to scientist who think inca stones are fake
supermarioworld9000 1 year ago
@supermarioworld9000
lol they are fake how can you say farmers don't know about dinosaurs? they found out about them the same way you did dumbass
o0somic0o 1 year ago
your mum
tardedZnerfZgun 1 year ago
I am a living fossil researcher and discover. [a, paleostitiszoologist, "the science of ancient surviving animals"]. I know from first hand, international, field experience, within my profession, that Dr. Hovind is absolutely right, and that there really are living dinosaurs that have survived their presumed extinction by science. I have personally encountered, seen, and studied, living dinosaurs in the field, myself.. It is time to change our postion about species extinction and evolution!
paleostitiszoologist 1 year ago
Yes, dinosaurs live today. We call them birds. Nice try kent
gregrutz 1 year ago
@gregrutz lol
bjam89 1 year ago
thank u god
gabybarrios1982 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hovind?
The failed auto mechanic?
The uneducated, violent fraud artist
who has been charged with assault, convicted of fraud,
and is currently in prison?
I mean, okay, he has a white lab jacket,
and he's a great poster boy for Creationism,
but nobody in their right mind would go to Hovind
for scientific facts, reality, or any sort of truth!
Imaginefree69 1 year ago
Why would a large reptile, even a dinosaur, prove anything for religion? It does nothing to refute anything on evolution... I'm sort of left scratching my head here.
wowsdrawkcab 2 years ago
Dinosaurs might have lived after the fall of the comet that almost got them extinct. They might have lived to recent times, not got extinct millions of years ago, but recent might be meant to be 10000years ago or more..maybe ye, man (anscestors) saw dinosaurs, hoowever some say 10k BC there was an ice age, maybe that finished dinosaurs off..maybe there was a lockness 700 years ago, However, there are sure no dinos now..especially with so much pollution and exploration, if there are theyre sneaky
Wolfgang42m 2 years ago
'Before they began to censor out anything that goes against the evolution theory..." Is he joking? Please tell me he's joking.
666Porphyria666 2 years ago
Argh. This guy is so annoying. He seems to think that if dinosaurs are still alive today, it debunks evolution. I'm still not sure why he thinks this will give creationists credibility.
666Porphyria666 2 years ago
Hmmmm. This is interesting. Not very scientific, but none the less very interesting. It's a cool thought.
JoeyDeBird 2 years ago
"the natives say there are dinosaurs in there"
Wow. Such compelling evidence. I'm convinced.
rddaos 2 years ago 2
"Darwin says he thinks many species might have evolved from simple organisms" and on this "evidence" we teach presumption as scientific fact to all the impressionable school kids
karnoch 2 years ago
Yes but you forgot to mention the evidence for evolution, from fossil, to geologic, to taxonomic, to genetic, to observed evolution and speciation. You're curious to learn what evolution science really says. I congratulate you for being curious enough to ask me!
rddaos 2 years ago
"observed evolution" !!!! haha...excuse me while i get up from rolling on the floor laughing. i suppose you are referring to some moths of different color, or birds that "adapt" and "evolve"....but you know what? a dog is a dog, a cat is a cat, a moth is a moth, and NOTHING has ever been observed changing into something else. as to the rest of your claims, there is zero evidence for evolution. period.
karnoch 2 years ago
Scientists can figure out how something happened without observing it directly, dummy. We know pluto orbits our sun and takes 250 years to complete 1 revolution, even though no one has ever witnessed pluto do this. Understand? No, of course you don't!
rddaos 2 years ago
if nobody has ever seen pluto orbit the sun, then how would we "know" a damn thing about it? scientists can take guesses at how something happened without observing it directly. this applies to any postulation about the history of earth past human record....duh.
karnoch 2 years ago
because we've taken calculus and physics, dummy.
rddaos 2 years ago
well, with your vast knowledge of how things work that can't be observed, why don't you figure out how to control gravity and generate free electricity? if i'm a dummy, what does that infer about your mental abilities, you imbecile?
karnoch 2 years ago
karnoch you too can have a bit of knowledge if you just pick up a book and read once in a while!
rddaos 2 years ago
@karnoch thank you. some people always forget that charles darwin made a theory that everything that is was once was a simpler form. macro and micro evolution is 2 differnt things! a voyage and study session does not prove any evolution theory.
NickelodeonMovement3 1 year ago
And please, do not be ashamed to ask me what evolution science actually says. I haven't met a creationist yet who has the slightest idea what the theory actually says. So do not feel like you're the only one!
rddaos 2 years ago
i am fairly certain YOU don't have the slightest idea what the so-called "theory of evolution" says either. and just to point out, it isn't a theory, or even a testable hypothesis. so much for your scientific method...
karnoch 2 years ago
Karnoch...
By denying theory of evolution is to deny vast other theories in the scientific field.
(and if you state "it's just a theory", you'll lower yourself into plantlife)
Let's take one theory; the ice age.
-This is based on evidence found today, as with all scientific theories.
If the bible is true, ice age never happened.
-Yet Nordic lands in particular are filled with evidnce to support it.
ArmaFennica 2 years ago
sigh....ok, let's do this. actually, the bible does support the occurance of an ice age. it happened after the flood, due to the rapid cooling of our atmosphere since we no longer had the cloud cover that was there pre-flood. secondly....pay attention....EVOLUTION IS NOT A THEORY. that's right, find a grade school science book and read about the scientific method. first comes an observation, then comes a hypothesis to explain it, then, if experiments support it, it can be called a theory.
karnoch 2 years ago
You might want to re-read what I wrote on the theory of evolution back there..
(and evidence do support it)
Now, on the Ice age.
-Saying that Ice age occurred after the alledged worldwide flood is amusing to say the least.
-Ice age has left such significant and numerous evidence that your thesis sinks with just one of them.
Swamps. Nordic swamps are no more than 10meters deep. That is because they grow thickness in a constant, slow manner.
Ten meters equals 10 000years.
ArmaFennica 2 years ago
@karnoch nope- wrong...if experiments DON'T prove the hypothesis wrong, THEN it may become theory after a great number of re-testings by the scientific community, a technical- but vital difference than the process you speak of, otherwise experiments could be designed to support the hypothesis, and you see the folly there, of course...
skatetolive34 1 year ago
That last photo of the snake is a fake. The kid cut the snake open and crawled inside (weirdo). Why, then, isn't the media all over this. There can't be that big of a conspiracy. How often do people find bones and fleshy carcasses of dinosaurs. And how often do people find human remains preserved in solid rock. Face it. Because the Bible doesn't mention evolution, doesn't mean that it wasn't one of "God's tools". The Bible doesn't mention many things that are real.
htiberian 2 years ago
You are incorrect, thats a dead human cut out of a snake after it was swallowed whole.
MG42pillbox 2 years ago
No I am sorry. I have a hard time believing the snake's jaws could have made it past his shoulders. I saw a monster quest episode about giant snakes. This photo was brought up and examined only to be declared very doctored.
htiberian 2 years ago
THank God for this man of God
Hiw333 3 years ago 2
@Hiw333 Thank God he is in prison.
gregrutz 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Hiw333 THank God for this man of God is in jail for lying about his taxes.
gregrutz 1 year ago
this is totally the truth, how are people so blind into believing a fairy tale(evolution) and completely deny the scientific FACTS here? and for redgreennerd, he's in prison because he refused to pay taxes because that is against his beliefs. and is frankly, against mine.
artem1002 3 years ago 2
amen to everything you just said artem1002!
God bless.
cloudyboy87 2 years ago
@artem1002 this is not scientific fact, this famous creature has not been found, like lochness many people claim to see it yet not evidence to prove it. drawings dont count. you'd think with todays technology someone exploring would have caught this on tape by now. crocs and few others are surviving dinosaurs but the vast majority are extinct! a trex and mammoth did not live in the same time period. shit how would we be alive now if we coexisted with such predators
delabuenavida 1 year ago
@artem1002
He thinks if we find a dinosaur living today it would prove evolution wrong. NOT.
But he does not know enough about evolution to prove it wrong.
gregrutz 1 year ago
2 Thessalonians 2: he will send them strong dillusion so that they would believe the lie. God is basically saying, I told you the truth, you had your chance to believe it but you chose to believe Satan, fine, here's strong dillusion which will get you the same fate as Satan. This is why no matter how much proof there is to support the Bible, atheists are just convinced they're right cus their dillusion is extremely strong, coming from God himself.
gymguy25 1 year ago
@artem1002 A living dinosaur would not prove evolution wrong, that is how little he understands evolution.
gregrutz 1 year ago
Some people do make mistakes, all fall short of the glory of God. God's truth, though, is still God's truth.
poetsloft7 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@poetsloft7 ''God's truth, though, is still God's truth''
WOW, did you figure that out youself?!?
Which God?
gregrutz 1 year ago
LOL he's in prison now.
redgreennerd 3 years ago
is he really?? how!?
holypally33 2 years ago
i would trust this guy over logic and science any day.
Gad bless america
bastardtubeuser 3 years ago
Possibly because you're unwilling to admit that you make mistakes and don't want to have to answer to them to a REAL authority figure (*coughnotDarwincough*).
Wow, look how FAR I'm getting being an ASS to someone and being COMPLETELY SARCASTIC HERE. Because that's DEFINITELY WHAT CONVINCES PEOPLE, when you treat them like the IDIOTS THEY ARE.
Great vid, does anybody have his contact info? Or was that in the video and I just missed it? *goes to watch again*
Taiyosuna 3 years ago
when god is on your side, you cannot losse an argument, amen.
bastardtubeuser 3 years ago
That's nothing you would know about.
You will regret mocking God and his truth.
I'd make you regret it right now, but since you're just some ass on the internet, I don't have that ability.
Taiyosuna 3 years ago
relax young man , your getting ahead of yourself with personal threats against a man of christs church.
read this bible passage to feel better about your failure to respect your elders . god and myself are wiling to forgive you.
Psalm 73:26
My flesh and my heart may fail, but God is the strength of my heart and my portion forever.
bastardtubeuser 3 years ago
Okay first of all: I'm not a man of any age. Second of all, you're probably at least 6 years younger than I am like most of the people here that call themselves adults. Third of all: what kind of "man of god" can't at least capitalize God and Christ? Not saying that's necessary for any sort of Christianhood but I'd be a bit disappointed if I wrote to my pastor and he responded in chatspeak.
Fourth of all, you should know that there's not a Christian in the world that hasn't lost an argument.
Taiyosuna 3 years ago
ok first of all , i am probably 12 years older than you. second of all gods name dose not need to be capitalized . third of all , i have been a pastor for 20 years and i have never made a bad argument or said anything that our loving god disaproves of.
fourth of all, i am the voice of god. you know that i have never lost an argument nor is it possible.
read your bible more sinner.
bastardtubeuser 3 years ago
I literally read my Bible every night, thanks.
I would feel bad for your church, if I actually believed you were over 13 years of age.
I despise pastors who think they're better than other people, especially when they're assholes who can't spell or use grammar.
You belong in Sunday School, where I teach the four-year-olds how to capitalize the word "God".
Taiyosuna 3 years ago
pastors ARE better than other people, have you actualy been to a chruch before ?.
i dont believe that you read your bible everynight let alone ever.
your offensive language and behaviour prove that you are quite a young child who dose not respect religion or their elders.
you belong in sunday school with the children, no wait... you are .
bastardtubeuser 3 years ago
Says the moron who has the word "bastard" right in his username. O:
Taiyosuna 3 years ago
your attitude amazes me , i cant beleive people would let you near their kids.
you should get back in the kitchen and do something usefull for a change.
silence you deamon whore of satan.
bastardtubeuser 3 years ago
Yes. Because God loves to listen to our petty arguments.
htiberian 2 years ago