Added: 2 years ago
From: MrXstacey
Views: 1,114
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (140)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • What a catchy meme that jingle is, in the morning!

  • @aquartlow Climategate 2 was a bunch of hacked emails from a FIRST draft of a chapter of an IPCC report (from 2005) that was released two years later. The whole thing about it being "dangerous" to accept the one study was because they barely had any data and they needed further research. I'll read the next articles tmrw; just got here.

  • @demdanglibruls LOL

    Hacked or not.............your AGW crap is wheezing and on the ropes.

    "Things don't look promising for the perennial climate confab which convenes in Durban, South Africa today. There is little chance of extending the expiring 1997 Kyoto Protocol to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions. Kyoto has turned into a giant international scam that has already wasted hundreds of billions, with little to show for it;"

  • @aquartlow Kyoto was a modest success. Many countries did cut back on Carbon emissions. Unfortunately, due to political pressure, the US of A did not agree and has been releasing GHGs in large quantities since then. The people who love their regional proxy data are the denialists.

  • @demdanglibruls

    Another thing.......Climategate 2 has not been denied by the authors of the emails in question. Read them yourself. Stop data mining warmist blogs.

    Soon you will have no choice. None at all.

  • @aquartlow The emails are mostly cold turkey from 2009, some from 2007, and some from 2005. It seems as if these were released to correspond with the recent talk and to cast doubt after the independent Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature has confirmed the accuracy of the temperature records. Your boy Watts said:

  • @aquartlow "... I’m prepared to accept whatever result they produce, even if it proves my premise wrong. I’m taking this bold step because the method has promise. So let’s not pay attention to the little yippers who want to tear it down before they even see the results."

    Of course, after the results showed the accuracy, Watts backpedaled and said they were wrong.

  • @aquartlow Actually, Watts deserves a gold star. He said that NOAA weather stations did not meet regulatory code using microsite data, and he said the temperatures were inaccurate. The Journal of Geophysical research showed he was correct- the weather stations UNDERESTIMATED the warming trend. Good job, Watts, for adding to the massive body of evidence for AGW.

  • @aquartlow Yes, they did not deny them... the last thing I read said that there were simply too many emails for them to deny. Just a note to you, there are more than 3 scientists researching AGW. You seem to think that a few people at CRU represent the whole body of evidence.

  • @aquartlow AHA! Gravity must be a lie! The Laws of Motion are SOCIALIST LIES! Look...

    Newton aware of fraud:

    "You need not give yourself the trouble of examining all the calculations of the Scholium. Such errors as do not depend upon wrong reasoning can be of no great consequence & may be corrected by the reader."

  • @aquartlow More of these lies:

    "There is nothing which I desire to avoid in matters of philosophy more then contentions, nor any kind of contention more then one in print: & therefore I gladly embrace your proposal of a private correspondence. What’s done before many witnesses is seldom without some further concern then that for truth: but what passes between friends in private usually deserve ye name of consultation rather then contest, & so I hope it will prove between you & me."

  • @aquartlow I have proved it. Newton is a liar and wants to control the peer review process, so therefore gravity is a fraud. The Laws of Motion are a Fraud. Your evil Gravity agenda is falling apart.

    My point is that anyone can cherry pick and draw interesting conclusions. The Bible tells me:

    "There is no God."

  • @aquartlow I am not well versed in the biases of british news sources. American Thinker promotes vaccine hysteria and intelligent design. I'll be back on wednesday b/c im travelling tommorrow.

  • @demdanglibruls "CRU is considered by the climate community as a data centre, but we don't

    have any resources to undertake this work. Any work we have done in the past

    is done on the back of the research grants we get – and has to be well hidden. I've

    discussed this with the main funder (US Dept of Energy) in the past and they are

    happy about not releasing the original station data."

    Phil Jones, 2009

    Climategate 2.0

  • You want truth? You want credibility?

    Read all the IPCC reports first. If those are too long and hard for you, go to skepticalscience's website. Greenman3610 and Potholer54 run an excellent series of videos which reveal the lies and fraud committed by the coal-industry-funded AGW-denial religion.

  • @mphello I want truth. I want credibility. You want what you want. This video exposes your "religion" and you just hate it. Get used to it. Your globaloney is rotting from the inside out.

    bad code is bad code.............you live in leftist fantasy.

  • @aquartlow

    BULLSHIT. You only want to live in your rightwing fantasy of no consequences for actions

    and getting something for nothing, not having to pay the price.

    And observe: YOU brought up the left-right paradigm, not I. That proves that you denialist fanatics are foaming at the mouth, lying and pretending that you're "politically neutral" and "fair and balanced", but the truth is just nanometers beneath your sking.

  • @mphello

    Oh dear. You will truly suffer when your green fantasy crumbles totally. And it will mind you. You, yourself, see it happening on the world stage. Kyoto is a blow job and the Chinese give a fuck what you think.

    I fear for your sanity when Al globalwarming-has-been-very-go­od-to-me Gore makes his final billion on suckers like you.

    LOL

  • @aquartlow

    You AGW-deniers and the islamofascists that plague India, Iran, Iraq, and now Europe should have a war together and kill each other. Just leave the rest of us - the rational sane hard-working people - out of it.

    Your heroes and loverboys Loud Monckton and Alex Jones can lead the charge and be the first to die.

  • @mphello

    one world sweety: Climategate.

  • @aquartlow

    one word, shithead: BULLSHIT

    one word, shithead: MOCKINGTON.

  • @mphello

    LOL..........I and my son are moving to North Dakota soon. The paychecks are fat with overtime and bonuses. We are the Saudi Arabia of Natural Gas and yes even oil.

    The unemployment in that state is around 2.3 percent.

    Keep dreaming my friend. Hungry family men with little gas in their tanks are beginning to see you for what you are: a total fraud and a power seeking collectivist to boot.

    Toodles!

  • @aquartlow

    Obviously you enjoy freeloading off the hard work and livelihoods of others that you destroy.

    Scum like you should not be allowed to have kids. Hope your kid is taken away from you by the state.

  • @mphello let's see.........WWI, WWII, Korea, Viet Nam.........all of them combined slaughtered millions and who dragged the US in? Wilson, FDR, Truman, Kennedy/LBJ............all leftist democrats.

    keep watching sweety.......the AGW myth is melting like the Greenland Iceshelf.

    oh and islamofascists work hand in hand with you and your bloody-shirt socialist street rabble. Comrades in arms until victory then you both become wolves and begin plotting to kill each other. Like Hitler and Stalin.

  • @aquartlow Instead of reading denialist blogs, read Nature or another reputable scientific journal. If that is too much, try Scientific American or Discovery, which are informative popular science magazines written to be read by the general populace. However, they are not journals, and don't mistake them as such.

  • @demdanglibruls Dear me. I did not intend to confuse you. I am well versed in the scandalous tripe that both Scientific American and Nature deliver. Not sure about the "Newsweek" of the scientific world Discovery, but the first two are rife with the "control the vetting" scheming from our friends P. Jones et al.

    I read the data like you read the data. The difference is that I am not a warmist fanatic with a suicidal urge.

    Face it. The greenpeas agenda is hitting the rocks of truth.

  • @aquartlow Discover, not discovery. the reason denialist reports rarely make it in to journals is because few scientists publish any, and most who do have serious conflicts of interest, and their reports are simply inaccurate. Apparently you don't read Scientific American or Nature, because nature is a JOURNAL which has peer review, while Scientific American is simply a well researched magazine written by people who have science degrees.

  • @demdanglibruls "which has peer review, while Scientific American is simply a well researched magazine written by people who have science degrees. "

    Evidently you never got the memo. Jones and Co. agreed to subvert and control the peer review process in order to conceal their corruption and deceit.

    Try to keep up dear.

  • @aquartlow You have yet to accept my challenge. You seem to be the one who has trouble keeping up, as I pointed out your error- Scientific American has no peer review process. Nature is not secretly controlled by Jones, the peer reviewers are selected out of a large number of scientists with relevant expertise. The "magic hockey stick" was confirmed by several independent studies, and...

  • @aquartlow ...the Wegman Report published by two famous deniers was heavily criticized and a fraud, going as far as plagiarism from Wikipedia (!). I, once again, challenge you to give me your best conspiracist quote from climategate.

  • @aquartlow I feel really sorry for Phil Jones. Now, almost every single double digit IQ denialist has a scapegoat to blame as an evil mastermind in the conspiracy.

  • @demdanglibruls

    I don't feel sorry for Phil Jones. He paid for his countryhouse and Benz with American taxpayer funds. And Mann? I don't feel sorry for him either.

    It's nice living the grant life. Have some grads teach your classes and then pretend to actually do science. Hmmmm..........I wonder why Jones was so adamant about stonewalling the investigators? Transparency? LOL

    Keep watching the news. Your socialist dreams are going the way of the Dodo.

  • @aquartlow Once again, give me your best evidence from Climategate. The "grant life" for most climatologists is in the 50 to 100k range. However, an expert for hire for Exxon can make 150 to 200k. Is it "socialist" to accept the science behind AGW? I thought you said we were the ones using politics. You keep bringing up politics. Phil Jones is an ISI highly cited researcher- I doubt you know what that means, considering your lack of misunderstanding. A 15 year old knows this better than you.

  • @aquartlow Teh evil soshulists and libruls are takin over teh world by infiltrating almost all scientific institutions in the world!

  • @aquartlow Ma'am, please tell me what your views are: is the Earth cooling, is it warming but not due to human causes, or is it constant?

  • @aquartlow I'm waiting for your proof of the conspiracies in Climategate... I suspect you are dodging the question.

  • @demdanglibruls "I'm waiting for your proof of the conspiracies in Climategate... I suspect you are dodging the question."

    Read the emails. They are obtainable. I got them. So can you.

    I suspect you are wetting your linens at night worrying about how deftly I will skewer you in the morning, after breakfast.

    Keep watching the political horizon sweety. Like a Kyoto whirlpool, your socialist agenda is being sucked away...........and well it should be.

    You need to get more sleep.

  • @aquartlow I did read the emails. Most if it was technical jargon about projections and readings, but the reason semi illiterate denialists like you hop on the crazy train is because of the use of the word "trick". The word "trick" is used to mean a mathematical solution, which is pretty obvious if you weren't so deep in this conspiracy theory. I want you give me a quote from the emails which indicates conspiracy, because obviously you will not agree with my explanation.

  • @aquartlow You have not "deftly skewered" me at all. You have made pathetic attempts to prove your point, and have created a convenient strawman to knock down by creating an evil soshulist who is conspiring to take over the world. Of course I was up late, because that is what most 15 year olds do on a Friday night.

  • @demdanglibruls

    Touched another nerve did I?

    Sorry. You must be metrosexual and weak.

  • @aquartlow Yeah, stupid people tick me off. Apparently you have just lost because you are just throwing insults at me online. What does being a metrosexual have to do with AGW? How high of you, desperately throwing insults at me because you fail to address the issue. You are a very childish, immature person.

  • @demdanglibruls

    yep, you're metro alrighty. Why the gel you use and the eye shadow you use pollution Gaia! Don't be a hypocrite.

    You have nothing but Jones and Mann etc......and all have been totally debunked.

    The phony story about the Himalayan ice killing half of India was the type of nonsense you spew.

    The truth is coming and it's gonna hurt.

  • @aquartlow Kudos to your very creative strawman. A metrosexual socialist who conspires to take over the world? Interesting. The only one spewing nonsense is you. The Gaia hypothesis is complete nonsense, much like AGW denialism. Jones and Mann were debunked? When? The Wegman report was the best attempt, and it fell flat on its face, cherry picking and manipulating, and quoting from wikipedia.

  • @demdanglibruls "Jones and Mann were debunked? When? "

    Oh like a thousand times......even when they fought like marxist heros on the ramparts to thwart a very legal FOIA.

  • @aquartlow There is nothing "marxist" about learning about the natural world. It is a great thing for us to expand upon our knowledge and change according to problems that could emerge in the future. Maybe it is a common belief in the right wing, but there is nothing seditious or communist about knowledge.

  • @aquartlow The WWF interviewed a scientist who said much of the Himalayan glacier would melt by 2350 and wrote it in as 2035. This was not noticed by any deniers, but by a scientist, who pointed it out. This was also in a WG2 report, which studies the social impact of AGW, not the actual science. Of course, minor errors in a thousand page report won't dissuade a devoted denialist like yourself.

  • @demdanglibruls "This was not noticed by any deniers, but by a scientist, who pointed it out."

    Wrong again.

  • @aquartlow No, the person to first read and catch the error was an Austrian Climatologist, and then the deniers latched on. Jones and Mann did comply with several FOIA requests, but the ones they were non-compliant were mostly due to Mcintyre's constant spamming. Phil Jones explains it:

    "Mike and I are not sending anything, partly because we don’t have some of the series he wants, also partly as we’ve got the data through contacts like you, but mostly because he’ll distort and misuse them."

  • @aquartlow Stop with the strawmen. They are amusing and creative, but now it is simply becoming idiotic.

    The Truth is Coming and it's gonna hurt.

  • @demdanglibruls LOL

    The judge in England that exposed the lies in gore's propaganda piece would like you to know that you are being played.

  • @aquartlow Gore's law? Like I said, Gore is a deceptive jerk who is almost as bad as the deniers. He is the main reason why so many wingnuts are convinced AGW doesn't exist. The only one being played here is you; you are just as idiotic as the "911 was an inside job" nuts. They envision a GOP conspiracy; you a liberal conspiracy. Otherwise, not much is different.

  • @demdanglibruls Gore's law?

  • @aquartlow Gore's Law states:

    "As an online climate change debate grows longer, the probability that denier arguments will descend into attacks on Al Gore approaches one."

  • @aquartlow You only think from a political viewpoint, shunning the science because mainstream conservative pundits denounce it. What do you think is happening? GW, but not due to humans? Global cooling? Nothing at all?

  • @demdanglibruls No, you silly goose. I embrace science. I am 61 years old and was there on the first Earth Day. Since that day I have watched the refugees of the USSR and other disappointed UCLA and Berkley types morph into those-who-weep-for-whales but not for unborn humans. Science is not ever settled my dear. Never let that piece of agit-prop from Algore fool you. If your scientific conclusion can stand up to scrutiny then good, but the entire AGW . Who is the denier? Me? or You?

  • @aquartlow No it isn't. I completely agree that science is never settled. Five independent studies by the evil socialist Brits found no wrongdoing, as did multiple ethics committees. The CRU replicated the data. Climategate was a manufactroversy created by deniers.

  • @aquartlow I do not let the piece of "agit-prop" from Al Gore fool me. Al Gore is the main reason why it is so popular to deny AGW these days.

  • @demdanglibruls "Al Gore is the main reason why it is so popular to deny AGW these days"

    Not a shred of truth in your statement. But the pursuit of the truth is not what you are about.

  • @aquartlow All I wish for is the truth. What is happening now is that Al Gore is a very convenient scapegoat. Instead of learning what the science has to say, most deniers are satisfied with insulting Al Gore and using that to somehow disprove global warming. You see a lot of denialist videos and blogs with titles such as "Al Gore sued by over 30,000" and "Al Gore's private jet", but few that actually take scientific papers and represent them in an honest, straightforward,and understanding way.

  • @demdanglibruls Al gore, once the pied piper of the phony AGW cult is now a very convenient scapegoat. Sorry old boy, I don't buy it.

    The science doesn't support a single notion of AGW. The shame of the New Zealand science scandal is matched by the Jones/Mann travesty. You can continue to ignore the facts but I cannot. I am reminded of the scene from OZ when Toto pulls back the curtain. The UN IPCC came up with it's summary first then backfilled the necessary data.

  • @aquartlow What New Zealand scandal? I am ignoring the facts? I have effectively refuted every single one of your baseless claims. You claimed the "hockey stick" was wrong. The only published document in any journal that attempted to refute it was the Wegman Report, supposedly the "evidence" you implied. I pointed out that it had poor methodology and was heavily criticized, and even quoted from wikipedia. Who is the denier there?

  • @demdanglibruls "I have effectively refuted every single one of your baseless claims."

    No. You did not.

  • @aquartlow You can stubbornly insist whatever you want. I also enjoy how you simply retort by denying my claims without backing up your assertions with any evidence. I'll continue:

    Your belief that somehow Mann and Jones are evil socialist geniuses who control the peer review process in both Nature and Scientific American (which doesn't even have peer review, by the way)

  • @demdanglibruls

    You can stubbornly insist whatever you want. I also enjoy how simply retort by denying my facts without backing up your mewlings.

    Jones brags about controlling the peer review process and you stupidly prance by. How very "true believer" of you. Again.......who is the denier?

  • @aquartlow

    "Under questions from the committee, prominent climate sceptics Nigel Lawson and Benny Peiser, who represented the Global Warming Policy Foundation, conceded that the use of the word "trick" was innocuous."

    Out of the mouths of the few well educated skeptics of AGW out there. They deserve to be called skeptics.

  • @aquartlow The idea that it is a marxist socialist conspiracy-how could almost every single reputable scientific institution be covering this up?

    The notion that politicians are hiding evidence against AGW- ironically, that is occurring on the other side, with both Rick Perry and george W Bush actively hiding mentions of climate change and putting pressure on scientists.

  • @demdanglibruls I take note that the preponderance of warmist fanatics like you were once devote's of the USSR and uncle Joe. That ship sunk so you running dogs of leftwing fascism have become watermelons. I know you know what I mean.

    Perry put pressure on scientists? Bush did? you have proof? Like all your other proofs? invisible and without weight?

    Take note the Russian and Chinese attitudes re you and your warmist cronies? They would kill you and so you get to be Berkley brave. Here.

  • @aquartlow "Officials in Rick Perry's home state of Texas have set off a scientists' revolt after purging mentions of climate change and sea-level rise from what was supposed to be a landmark environmental report. The scientists said they were disowning the report on the state of Galveston Bay because of political interference and censorship from Perry appointees at the state's environmental agency."

    Guardian.co.uk

    Facts are facts and will not disappear on account of your likes.

  • @demdanglibruls

    Scientists say...........LOL..........you IDIOT...............I said PROOF.

    You really need to stop salivating over those warmist blogs..............they are full of lies. But warmist fanatics like you fail to take notice of that fact.

  • @demdanglibruls

    Ru roh... “Three themes are emerging from the newly released emails: (1) prominent scientists central to the global warming debate are taking measures to conceal rather than disseminate underlying data and discussions; (2) these scientists view global warming as a political ’cause’ rather than a balanced scientific inquiry and (3) many of these scientists frankly admit to each other that much of the science is weak and dependent on deliberate manipulation of facts and data.”

  • Guardian headline:

    "Revealed: the secret evidence of global warming Bush tried to hide

    Photos from US spy satellites declassified by the Obama White House provide the first graphic images of how the polar ice sheets are retreating in the summer. The effects on the world's weather, environments and wildlife could be devastating"

    It is easier to believe a lie that one has heard a thousand times than to believe a fact that no one has heard before

  • @demdanglibruls

    LOL........you quote the Guardian????????????????????? Are you on crack? The Guardian is good only for leftist screeds with Area 51 credibility.

    LOL..........You are a fool.

  • @aquartlow I looked up sources, and I found that the Daily Mail is just as insane as the Guradian-in the other direction. The first time I heard about Rick Perry's politicization of denialism was on NPR- a fairly credible source. The Washington Post backs me up on Bush and Perry. Don't dismiss facts because they disagree with your ideology.

  • @demdanglibruls "...and I found that the Daily Mail is just as insane as the Guradian-in the other direction. "

    Your excuse making is amusing. The noose tightens and you quiver............

    NPR........a credible source? You can feel that thing getting tighter and tighter.

    Climategate 2.0 is the final nail in the watermelon.

    When the time comes, don't fight it. It only hurts more.

  • @aquartlow My "excuse making" is explaining to you that I do not automatically wish to know the biases of my sources-most news sites don't pull things out of thin air. I find it amusing that you do not read or choose not to reply to my other comments, and say nonsense like "climategate 2.0 is the final nail in the watermelon" without explaining how it is. Almost all of the emails are rehashed from '09, '07, or '05. NPR is highly credible and doesn't pull things out of thin air.

  • @aquartlow What it says is true- Rick Perry did hide data because it did not conform with his denialist views, George W Bush did hide AGW evidence - apparently unless it comes out of the mouth of a pundit, it cannot be true, which is what you are implying. Your odd poetic way of writing comments does little for the debate-you just reuse the same old tactic and create interesting metaphors. The "Final Nail" (this one is at least the tenth) is a common denialist tactic.

  • @demdanglibruls "Rick Perry did hide data because it did not conform with his denialist views, George W Bush did hide AGW evidence - apparently unless it comes out of the mouth of a pundit, it cannot be true,"

    LOL

    First you purport to know Perry's mind (movtives) then you state that Bush hid evidence of your myth. You live in a world of straw arguments and Jonesian corruption. A corruption you deny. Are you now a denier?

  • @aquartlow The fact is, it is very easy to quote mine anything. Taking a bunch of quote mined emails from a small research unit and using them to demonstrate that AGW is a massive global socialist conspiracy is preposterous. I just read the article you sent. Among the majority of scientists who accept AGW there is a minor dispute over whether AGW will cause larger and stronger hurricanes. Many scientists reject the idea because the warming seen so far is too small to cause a notable effect.

  • @aquartlow The people who hate NPR are generally wingnuts and moonbats because it demonstrates the falws in being on the fringe. I was surprised when I heard about a study that said that 63% of the experts on NPR stories were conservative, while only 37% were liberal. I always viewed it as being biased to the left. This tentative evidence may indicate it has a conservative bias. Either way, it is a credible source.

  • @demdanglibruls ". I was surprised when I heard about a study that said ..."

    You heard.

    My, my.......so scientific........."hey a buddy o'mine down at the plant says......"

  • @aquartlow A 61 year old woman typing on a computer, calling people metrosexual socialists? That is a very funny picture in my mind.

  • @aquartlow "I'm not sure of much", is what you claim on your page. That is completely wrong. You are overconfident and brazenly spew nonsense and ignore most of my comments. You didn't change your viewpoint based on the facts- instead you attempt to change the facts to correspond with your viewpoint. Now you are the good guy, fighting back with "facts" against the evil metrosexual hipsters who plan to take over the world with their "watermelon" agenda. Nothing can dissuade a true believer™.

  • @aquartlow The sad fact of the matter is that you cannot change your mind. It is closed against any conflicting evidence and afraid of policies that might upset the status quo-even if keeping the status quo creates problems. Someone who is so hardened against the evidence will never be convinced- and will spend their days waging war on science.

  • @aquartlow The Chinese are worse than us when it comes to carbon emissions. Stalin was an evil dictator and I do not no of anyone, right or left, who agrees with his policies.

  • @aquartlow The idea that Climategate disproves AGW- it has been analyzed by several ethics committees and found to be honest and the evidence against it is simply semi illiterate deniers who think the word "trick" indicates a massive conspiracy, even though it simply is a mathematical solution to a problem, and the "hide the decline" is a quote referring to tree ring readings and a problem with the graphing

  • @demdanglibruls Climategate proves the duplicity of your sources and the naivete you proudly display. I am more than semi literate dear boy. I read the emails and came to my own conclusions. More than you can claim. You are being "tricked" and you gleefully join in.

    Try to keep up.

  • @aquartlow Well, you do not have a Ph.d in physics or climatology, unlike the reviewers on several of the committees. I back up my mewlings with actual sources, and if you wish I could cite all of them. All you do is utter "not true dear" and talk about the "socialist" evils of Jones or Mann.

  • @demdanglibruls Your mewlings are just that. I never spoke of the socialist evils of Jones or Mann. Dolt. They are warmist leeches who enjoy the perks of grant provided loot.

    My loot.

  • @aquartlow I'm the one struggling to keep up? You barely address most of my points.

  • @demdanglibruls

    "Writing in the Daily Mail, Lord Lawson delivers a scathing assessment of David Cameron’s so-called ‘green agenda’ and says it is ‘time this Government grew up’." You should too.

  • @demdanglibruls

    Keep trying old boy..........your world is crumbling and you notice nothing.

    Keep watching......Kyoto is not the only thing not happening.

    AGW is not happening and it is losing its panache'.

    Sit down and rest. You're going to have a heart attack trying to keep up with me.

  • @aquartlow Nowadays you can create almost an entire political platform on AGW denialism. Ask Jim Inhofe from my home state of OK.

  • @demdanglibruls

    The truth is coming and it's gonna hurt.

  • @aquartlow Global Warming is happening today. Please clarify which part you are questioning.

  • @aquartlow The fact that you confuse the two different types of publications makes me doubt that you are "well-versed", let alone aware of the science behind it.

  • @demdanglibruls The fact that you are confused about what I am well-versed in makes me positively giddy with the certainty that you will believe any trick from "Nature" or the fraudulent algorithms of the magic hockey stick.

    peace.

  • @aquartlow I am in no way a "warmist fanatic"; most reports predict rising sea levels and droughts in the future, which will most likely not end the world, but will cause loss of life in coastal areas and famine, especially in third world areas. I will probably be fine, and the rest of the world will adapt to coastline changes, but almost all scientists agree it is happening and damage will happen.

  • @demdanglibruls

    none of us "deniers" believes that climate is static. we just don't believe the trash that Mann, Jones and the Indian Engineer have served up. AGW is a hoax.

  • This video and the YouTuber are dangerous deluded cultists who edit out and censor the conclusions from the real patriotic hardworking climate scientists and the IPCC. They claim wrong conclusions from actual peer-reviewed climate articles without ever bothering to read the entire paper or cite its real conclusions.

    AGW is real, serious, and the US military and the world are in a war to fight AGW. Deniers are traitors and should be locked up for life.

  • Don't be a denier, the science is in! Science! In the morning!

  • @ScruffyK and a big In the Morning to you as well :)

  • Al Gore is in a business partnership with Corporations set up to cash in on this scheme.

    Gore besides his extensive ties to Republicans & Goldman Sachs businesses set up to cash in on the backs of the working/middleclass with Carbon Credit market creation, has ties to Occidental Petroleum Co, and a OIL DRILLING CO.!

    Al Gore is a fraud as is AGW, which as you can see by how they are addressing it is a massive Ponzi scheme that would make Bernie Madoff literally green with envy

    CLIMATEDEPOT com

  • Whilst you run a lesson on the neatness of code writing, the world keeps heating up.

    This report just in

    csiro . au/resources/State-of-the-Clim­ate . html

    And a little checkup on your sources discredits the material in the video.... only for the weak minded.

    Hide the decline was a fizzer, you've got lockjaw... get the dog a new bone

  • I AM A DENIER! LOLOL I did not JUST Like this Vid I LOVE IT!!!!!

    GREAT JOB!!!!!!! KEEP IT UP!

  • Global Warming was a scam, now it's dead!!!!

    And "climate change" is just plain STUPID because it is the NATURE of climate TO "change"!! When someone (or a company, commercial) uses the term "climate change" you MUST instantly label them an IDIOT!! :)

    It's the nature of climate to change ya idiot!

  • @GibbedHGR Climate isn't the same as weather.

    Were the Equator to suddenly freeze, would that be natural?

  • I love lampooning the AGW cultists but the sarcastic approach you used in the video didn't do it for me. You have some FANTASTIC video clips here. The computer programmer interview was particular powerful. I'd recommend deleting this video and redo the video w/o the sarcasm. It will be much more powerful...

  • I have been considering that myself, not for the same reasons, but I appreciate the input.

  • @MrXstacey Al Gore is a Cult Leader

  • @MrXstacey John Graham Cumming is not a denialist. In fact, i've read his blog and he infrequently criticizes the denialist movement. He realizes that for the most part it is unscientific.

  • Hey everybody,

    The CLIMATEDEPOT(dot)com website has some great new articles on all the scandals & malfeasance occuring daily at the IPCC & the GW scam

    Open magazine has "The Climate Change Fraud" on its cover

    The question now is, not that AGW is occuring, but how many people are going to be charged, & is this Al Gore's last flimflam scam?

    Maybe Choo Choo Charlie & Al Gore can do the honorable thing & wrap their heads in Saran wrap & ring Marshal Applewhite for the UFO Taxi Service to Nibiru

  • Climatedepot lacks any credibility. Try recommending sites that aren't run by denier douche bags. Marc Morano is one of the worst.

    tinyurl com / luekf2

    tinyurl com / yefxssj

  • You are such a sucker... it's hard to know where to start.

    Check your sources, go back to the original articles... you'll find distortions and lies.

    It's a fizzer that was supposed to go bang

  • We have hardly any snow here in Canada. Hmmmm if it isnt global warming what is it? Maybe hot air from global warming deniers. lol

  • Seriously, Americans will become poorer because obama's reckless fiscal and monetary policies are devaluing the USD resulting in higher taxes and inflation.

    Anyone with basic knowledge of economics knows that higher taxes and inflation are the main reasons why people get poorer. And, at this moment obama controls both.

    The cost of living will go up and people will be forced to rely on govn't. If you control the economy you control the people.

    Think about it.

    Fact: obama is the modern hitler!

  • GLOBAL WARMING IS A HOAX!

  • @basenjib123 deniers are the first people we'll push out the gate when the poor come to consume our children. Lol.

  • Eric Raymond seems to be wasting your time.

    tinyurl com / yzten52

  • I'll look into it, thanks for the link.

  • *****

  • George Orwell 1984 at work. You don't like history change it.

  • In any other industry these people would be jailed for fraud.

  • Global warming is such a fraud that Canada is building fake ski jumps for the Olmypics..... with straw and snow trucked in from distant glaciers. It's so warm they can't even make fake snow. LOL

    Al Gore is scum, lock the opportunist up and throw away the key.

  • We just had the snowiest winter since 1969.

    The Climate is unpredictable - I would have thought that watching the weather news would have given a clue as to how 'accurate' this science is.

    You Holocaust denier. lol (Just kidding - but they are trying to make that connotation).

    Ez Bulldogger - got Identured Servitude.

  • Equating Climate Change denial with Holocaust denial is cheap, those who use such tactics are idiots.

    Take is easy Kiddo, don't let the man get you down.

  • I agree, I've been called a climate change denier long enough now that I thought I'd throw it back at them. Plus I found the sound byte comical. lol

  • Vancouver should of never considered holding the Winter Olympics, Vancouver is known for its warm temperatures and rain since the beginning of time, now come to Ontario and I will show you frost bite, not to mention all other provinces in Canada. Vancouver is wasting their money, it could of gone to more important things!!!

  • @bulldogger A lack of snow on mountain tops tells you things are getting colder?

  • I was being sarcastic.

  • @bulldogger Ah sorry :(

  • Not only are they criminals but they are stupid criminals. Does anyone believe the UN bullshit still?

  • Great video, good work! :)

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more