"you gave me an std com", this is the site you need to check out, and tell your friends abou. I will be reading some of the post here on you tube so if you are interested save me as a favorite so you can watch my first episodes.
Joe's in this for his own ego and power. He's gone from being a civil rights freedom fighter to being an apologist for torture and a lying lapdog for Bush.
the only way we're going to be able to see change in Washington is to vote out the enables to Bush because they are a problem. We need to bring in new faces of democracy who will stand up to Bush. A vote for Ned Lamont IS a vote in the right direction!
Joe's in trouble because after 18 years of service, the only one benefiting is Joe! It's time to release Joe from the DC bubble and replace him with a man who is only beholden to the people, Ned Lamont (and don't worry, Ned expects the CT voters to hold his feet to the fire, that's why he'll be working for us!!!)
Former NATO Supreme Allied Commander Gen. Wes Clark on Ned Lamont: "Standing up to President Bush's failed policy in Iraq, dispensing with self-serving and wishy-washy notions of 'independence,' and pledging to invest in America's future, Ned Lamont is a candidate for Senate who I am proud to endorse,"
President Bill Clinton on Joe Lieberman: "There were almost no Democrats who agreed with his position, which was, 'I want to attack Iraq whether or not they have weapons of mass destruction.' His position is the Bush-Cheney-Rumsfeld position, which was, 'Does it matter if they have weapons? None of this matters. ... This is a big, important priority, and 9/11 gives us the way of attacking and deposing Saddam.'"
Ned has my vote, pity I'm not American!
ihaveipgtech 5 years ago
Ned rocks!
SuperJoe22 5 years ago
i agree 2
yigit2681 5 years ago
"you gave me an std com", this is the site you need to check out, and tell your friends abou. I will be reading some of the post here on you tube so if you are interested save me as a favorite so you can watch my first episodes.
twinslow80 5 years ago
If there was only a demo and repo in the 2000 Election, no Iraq, chad ballots, libermann would gone unattested.
libermann is only thinking of himself.
just another f()king Nadar scumbag.
dentalomental 5 years ago
Lather up, but come Nov. 7, Joe will win by 10 points or more.
drnuttyhead 5 years ago
Attack ads work. Trust me, I like positive ads too, but negative ads always work.
If you want to see some good positive ads, check out Eliot Spitzer's ads.
btinder711 5 years ago
Joe's in this for his own ego and power. He's gone from being a civil rights freedom fighter to being an apologist for torture and a lying lapdog for Bush.
radlib1 5 years ago
the only way we're going to be able to see change in Washington is to vote out the enables to Bush because they are a problem. We need to bring in new faces of democracy who will stand up to Bush. A vote for Ned Lamont IS a vote in the right direction!
voteshouldcount 5 years ago
Joe has gotta go.
FogerRox 5 years ago
Too many attack ads. Me no like.
shortfu 5 years ago
I guess Joe figures everyone has short term memories. It's time for a change, Connecticut!!!
Caoimhe2 5 years ago
I think Lamont would be a great addition to the senate. Too many old farts in there.
chazzadams 5 years ago
Joe's in trouble because after 18 years of service, the only one benefiting is Joe! It's time to release Joe from the DC bubble and replace him with a man who is only beholden to the people, Ned Lamont (and don't worry, Ned expects the CT voters to hold his feet to the fire, that's why he'll be working for us!!!)
hscureman 5 years ago
Ouch! That's gonna leave a mark!
"Joe: Part of the Problem!"
CTBob 5 years ago
Former NATO Supreme Allied Commander Gen. Wes Clark on Ned Lamont: "Standing up to President Bush's failed policy in Iraq, dispensing with self-serving and wishy-washy notions of 'independence,' and pledging to invest in America's future, Ned Lamont is a candidate for Senate who I am proud to endorse,"
joejoejoe 5 years ago
President Bill Clinton on Joe Lieberman: "There were almost no Democrats who agreed with his position, which was, 'I want to attack Iraq whether or not they have weapons of mass destruction.' His position is the Bush-Cheney-Rumsfeld position, which was, 'Does it matter if they have weapons? None of this matters. ... This is a big, important priority, and 9/11 gives us the way of attacking and deposing Saddam.'"
joejoejoe 5 years ago