lol i'm sorry but everything about the cts-v is better than the M5....absolutely everything...and 1 more thing....the M5 NEVER takes the lead in a drag race with the new ctsv...never, cts-v will just pull further and further away .
the last parts a load of BS the Cadillac has more power and the further the race the further the lead the guy must off pumped the breaks or something i guarantee if a more trust worthy car tester like motor trend or car and driver did that same race the caddy would win i dont trust auto car ever since they beat a zr1 in a 911 in a quarter mile race which simply is not going to happen
its not fair to compare M5 from 2005 and cts-v from 2009...if u put cts-v 2004-2005 with ls6 engine 400 bhp Bmw its the winner.its like you compare bugati veyron with other supercar 4 years older.
What's up with the drag races?! The outcome of these mean little to nothing in the 'real' world. The M5s and GT3s of this world aren't designed to be fast in a straight line, but to shatter the competition around corners. The straight line-thing is just a by-product.
The BMW M5 was designed and engineered in 2003/04. This CTSv was released in 2009.
The E60 2003-2009 M5 is already a competitor of the 2004-2008 CTSv. To compare this old M5 to the new CTSv would be comparing it to two completely generations of CTSv.
The true competitor for this next generation CTSv will be the 2010/11 M5. AMG E-Class, RS6 and others will be coming out as well. The Porsche Panamera already demolished the CTSv with a 7:56 N'ring time. Reply to this Rodikulus. ;)
The highest 1 or 2 gears on the CTS-V are probably tuned more for fuel economy while cruising the highway than performance & this is why it is slower at higher speeds. All gears on the BMW M5 are turned for performance & if it is the auto I believe it has 7 spds. There is no other reason why the CTS should be slower given it's HP & torque advantages. On a track this is irrelevant. racing at that speed on the autobaun would be irresponsible.
He says that the CTS-V wins JUST because the M5 caught up at higher speeds again. (And the fact that the CTS-V will catch up again when the M5 runs into the limiter is rubbish because you can get it w/o limiter too). And why most europeans don't accept these cars? I don't know, maybe some are just ignorant. I for my part don't like them because I HATE their plastic interior, overall quality and lack of all-day usability.
Its clear to me that u havent sat in one if u think it has a plastic interior like the older GM cars. The quality is a huge improvement and its on par with all of its rivals. And how is it not as usable as an M5? I wouldnt buy an M5 or a CTS-V but i still have to say the CTS-V is a better value for ur money
I actually sat (unfortunately couldn't drive it) in a ZR1 just a few days ago and the plastics are HORRBLE. Didn't have the chance to sit in a CTS-V yet. But as far as I can tell from pictures and some reviews, it's true that the interior is a real leap forward compared to the older cars. But saying that it's on par with it's rivals is quite a lot too much, don't you think? You can't really tell which of the two is better, it really depends on what you want from a car.
I have no idea what the ZR1 interior is like but the standard CTS has interior that is as good or better than its main competition such as the G37 and 3 series. Its almost overdone with leather wrapped dash and pop up nav screen and premium leather etc. I think if u sat in one you would be very surprised. But i also noticed the 3.6L CTS ends up costing more than the G37 or TL or IS350...so u are paying for all that extra luxury...i used to hate GM but their current products r much improved
they're not that fast. M5s get spanked on roll on races. Every Autocar's vids with Euro vs America favors Euro cars just BM vids favoring Japense rides.
funny thing is most roll on videos from the states show completely different result
it's always the same with all of their video. This is starting to seem like BM videos where they pick the track that favors japanese rides and they always win
Really ? I haven't seen a lot of CTS-V videos, but I do believe you, sounds logical to me. I'm not a huge fan of American cars, but the CTS-V is just a beast. If the Dutch goverment would screw the people so hard with all the taxes, I would've bought it for sure. True bang for the buck.
Typical import snobs get beat and then they have to bad mouth the American cars, how pathetic. They're just embarrassed they spent 30 k more and get spanked! I wonder how many of these losers actually will ever own an m or any german car for that matter. Good luck to them on the overpriced parts & service, what a scam.
i love the fact that the M5's license plate has XFR written on it
horilazar 11 months ago
Typical Britshit.
thelovechild68 1 year ago
lol i'm sorry but everything about the cts-v is better than the M5....absolutely everything...and 1 more thing....the M5 NEVER takes the lead in a drag race with the new ctsv...never, cts-v will just pull further and further away .
UFCextra 1 year ago
The CTS-V has 50 more horsepower.... it's obvious the CTS-V is faster because they both weigh nearly the same
AntDX316 1 year ago
CTS-V is by far my favorite american car. Can't wait until the coupe version is released to the public. Pretty damn near supercar.
Sampson712 1 year ago
the last parts a load of BS the Cadillac has more power and the further the race the further the lead the guy must off pumped the breaks or something i guarantee if a more trust worthy car tester like motor trend or car and driver did that same race the caddy would win i dont trust auto car ever since they beat a zr1 in a 911 in a quarter mile race which simply is not going to happen
atgskater14 1 year ago 3
@atgskater14 totally agree UK hates american cars. straight up. ZR1 and CTS-V are superior to ALL european automobiles.
UFCextra 1 year ago
@atgskater14
lol at motortrend being trust worthy, they are the most Anti-BMW magazine in existence...
Maui2010 1 year ago
@Maui2010
Motor Trend is pretty good for numbers not for comparison though. The best person for a comparison is the buyer themselves.
atgskater14 1 year ago
its not fair to compare M5 from 2005 and cts-v from 2009...if u put cts-v 2004-2005 with ls6 engine 400 bhp Bmw its the winner.its like you compare bugati veyron with other supercar 4 years older.
Sorry for my bad english
Boolundu69 1 year ago
m5 please
Seanbbn 1 year ago
Cadillac rules !!!
ForceChucky 1 year ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
M5 released in 2004, naturally aspirated. Demolished CTSv 2005-2008.
CTSv released in 2009 with a supercharger.
Next M5 not out yet to compete.
New 2011 550i receives twin turbo v8 engine.
M5 will receive something bigger, released in a year or so.
Panamera already took the #1 slot with 7:56.
Stop comparing cars of different generations.
HarryPotterShit1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What's up with the drag races?! The outcome of these mean little to nothing in the 'real' world. The M5s and GT3s of this world aren't designed to be fast in a straight line, but to shatter the competition around corners. The straight line-thing is just a by-product.
aethrus 1 year ago
Comment removed
aethrus 1 year ago
lets take these 2 cars to the track..
L0ngrun 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The BMW M5 was designed and engineered in 2003/04. This CTSv was released in 2009.
The E60 2003-2009 M5 is already a competitor of the 2004-2008 CTSv. To compare this old M5 to the new CTSv would be comparing it to two completely generations of CTSv.
The true competitor for this next generation CTSv will be the 2010/11 M5. AMG E-Class, RS6 and others will be coming out as well. The Porsche Panamera already demolished the CTSv with a 7:56 N'ring time. Reply to this Rodikulus. ;)
djinnbladex 2 years ago
The highest 1 or 2 gears on the CTS-V are probably tuned more for fuel economy while cruising the highway than performance & this is why it is slower at higher speeds. All gears on the BMW M5 are turned for performance & if it is the auto I believe it has 7 spds. There is no other reason why the CTS should be slower given it's HP & torque advantages. On a track this is irrelevant. racing at that speed on the autobaun would be irresponsible.
j85968 2 years ago
lol at this video
so the CTS is quicker to 60, 100, quicker thru the 1/4 mile but he says it JUST beats the M5
wonder how long it will take these europeans to accept the CTS-V and ZR1 into their lives lol
allstarhs 2 years ago
He says that the CTS-V wins JUST because the M5 caught up at higher speeds again. (And the fact that the CTS-V will catch up again when the M5 runs into the limiter is rubbish because you can get it w/o limiter too). And why most europeans don't accept these cars? I don't know, maybe some are just ignorant. I for my part don't like them because I HATE their plastic interior, overall quality and lack of all-day usability.
ratmtbola 2 years ago
Its clear to me that u havent sat in one if u think it has a plastic interior like the older GM cars. The quality is a huge improvement and its on par with all of its rivals. And how is it not as usable as an M5? I wouldnt buy an M5 or a CTS-V but i still have to say the CTS-V is a better value for ur money
allstarhs 2 years ago 2
I actually sat (unfortunately couldn't drive it) in a ZR1 just a few days ago and the plastics are HORRBLE. Didn't have the chance to sit in a CTS-V yet. But as far as I can tell from pictures and some reviews, it's true that the interior is a real leap forward compared to the older cars. But saying that it's on par with it's rivals is quite a lot too much, don't you think? You can't really tell which of the two is better, it really depends on what you want from a car.
ratmtbola 2 years ago
I have no idea what the ZR1 interior is like but the standard CTS has interior that is as good or better than its main competition such as the G37 and 3 series. Its almost overdone with leather wrapped dash and pop up nav screen and premium leather etc. I think if u sat in one you would be very surprised. But i also noticed the 3.6L CTS ends up costing more than the G37 or TL or IS350...so u are paying for all that extra luxury...i used to hate GM but their current products r much improved
allstarhs 2 years ago 2
M5 is better. Remember the fuel economy of the bmw is much better than the gas gussler cts-v. I think american cars are shit.
twittertwat08 2 years ago 2
dam on highway m5 is much faster:) and in germany better to have m5 :) or anywhere:)
dartasweideris 2 years ago
they're not that fast. M5s get spanked on roll on races. Every Autocar's vids with Euro vs America favors Euro cars just BM vids favoring Japense rides.
ph00ny1 2 years ago
What kind of idiot makes a car program presented by a fag and a woman?
ghostrider090 2 years ago
Comment removed
hypnos630 2 years ago
eat shit and die eurotrash bigot!
hypnos630 2 years ago
Well duh. The CTS-V has a bigger engine and has a supercharger. It suprised me that the M5 is faster at higher speeds.
ralph3nuis 2 years ago
funny thing is most roll on videos from the states show completely different result
it's always the same with all of their video. This is starting to seem like BM videos where they pick the track that favors japanese rides and they always win
ph00ny1 2 years ago
Really ? I haven't seen a lot of CTS-V videos, but I do believe you, sounds logical to me. I'm not a huge fan of American cars, but the CTS-V is just a beast. If the Dutch goverment would screw the people so hard with all the taxes, I would've bought it for sure. True bang for the buck.
ralph3nuis 2 years ago
RELAX, The M5 lost. Yeah it sucks, but hé, atleast the BMW doesnt fall apart at a certain miles.
Tha0men 2 years ago
Yea, American cars hit the 20,000 mile mark and start falling apart!
Ghidorah13 2 years ago
The M5 was driven by that FAT CHICK so that's why it lost....
vimann 2 years ago 3
NA > Force .Induc
Vietplaya1987 2 years ago
The worst most one sided review ever, these guys did it with the zr1 and now the cts v. Hating on the americans as usuall. Fuck you guys.
camarosam 2 years ago 2
Typical import snobs get beat and then they have to bad mouth the American cars, how pathetic. They're just embarrassed they spent 30 k more and get spanked! I wonder how many of these losers actually will ever own an m or any german car for that matter. Good luck to them on the overpriced parts & service, what a scam.
hypnos630 2 years ago 8
@hypnos630 rich people are willing to pay extra.
redphiveII 1 year ago
fuck CTS-V...Mpower 4 life
shabe9 2 years ago
you on the losing side bitch
wildcat1559 2 years ago
Heres a review of the saloon verus m5 from a guy who graduated top of his class from the Tiff Neddell school of body langauge and hand gestures.
dagnut 2 years ago 7
LOL dagnut .
cadillacman007 2 years ago