I'm Sure 67's Can Only Land There From A Domestic Route, A 67 Wouldn't Be Able To Stop Fast Enough At Lindbergh If It Were Coming From Tokyo Or South America
@ThePlaneGuy17 1. that made no sense. it would have the same amount of gas left in it no matter where it came from because they fill it to an amount that it will have the same amount of gas leftover when it arrives.
2. 777 and 787 are starting service into lindbergh.
3. 777 has had service into lindbergh before.
4. St. Maarten is 2000+ feet shorter on the runway and 747s land there.
5. It takes longer to takeoff than to land because it is full of fuel.
@packerbackerfan4 actually the only reason 47's are able to land at st. maarten because both KLM and Coarsair fly a triangle route to make the aircraft lighter on landing so it stops in time
@ThePlaneGuy17 I didn't mean to sound rude in the last comment if it came out that way. I just read it again and realized it could have been interpreted as being rude. And what is this triangle route that u are talking about. Sometimes 747 cargo airplanes land at Lindbergh. Do they do triangle routes?
@packerbackerfan4 It's okay, I didnt take it wrong, and a triangle route is where an aircraft goes from a hub, to one airport, to another airport (Which would be St. Maarten for the route KLM flies) and back to the hub, it might not really look like a triangle that's just what they call it, and I'm not sure that the 47's that fly to SAN do the same but they probably have a lower weight limit and they are probably 100's and 200's because they don't need as much area to stop
@packerbackerfan4 Well a plane can never start with an empty fuel tank, there is always a minimum amount of fuel every aircraft has to have on board, it varies depending on the aircraft. And it makes it lighter because the aircraft uses ever pound of fuel that its allowed to use, and theres probably less passengers and cargo on board because they might fly to a lower rated airport, that could also cause for a lower landing weight.
Since the 70s a number of airlines have brought their wide-bods to SanDiego. Delta 767s and L1011s. TWA 767s andLl1011s. American and United DC10s and 767s. British Airways 777s and 747s. And a few more..
Actually we had a 747-400 delta airlines coming to San Diego a few months ago carrying a football team , also a few years ago 777 british airways use to come over here,
Yeah, FED EX flies MD-11s out of there too, obviously at below the max gross weight. The runway is about 9000ft and some with the displaced threshold, so it's fine. Wrote that comment a while ago before thinking, or i might have confused SAN with SNA for a bit. So, when are those 767s coming to John Wayne? haha
@anush10 actually SAN has a lot of 767's esp with cargo...every now and then 747s land there, and sometime in the near future hawaiian airlines planes to use their new a330s out of SAN
I love that flight, the 767 at san diego, a great sight, awesome video!!
Airshowlover100 2 months ago
I'm Sure 67's Can Only Land There From A Domestic Route, A 67 Wouldn't Be Able To Stop Fast Enough At Lindbergh If It Were Coming From Tokyo Or South America
ThePlaneGuy17 9 months ago
@ThePlaneGuy17 1. that made no sense. it would have the same amount of gas left in it no matter where it came from because they fill it to an amount that it will have the same amount of gas leftover when it arrives.
2. 777 and 787 are starting service into lindbergh.
3. 777 has had service into lindbergh before.
4. St. Maarten is 2000+ feet shorter on the runway and 747s land there.
5. It takes longer to takeoff than to land because it is full of fuel.
Thank you for your input anyway :)
packerbackerfan4 9 months ago
@packerbackerfan4 actually the only reason 47's are able to land at st. maarten because both KLM and Coarsair fly a triangle route to make the aircraft lighter on landing so it stops in time
ThePlaneGuy17 9 months ago
@ThePlaneGuy17 I didn't mean to sound rude in the last comment if it came out that way. I just read it again and realized it could have been interpreted as being rude. And what is this triangle route that u are talking about. Sometimes 747 cargo airplanes land at Lindbergh. Do they do triangle routes?
packerbackerfan4 9 months ago
@packerbackerfan4 It's okay, I didnt take it wrong, and a triangle route is where an aircraft goes from a hub, to one airport, to another airport (Which would be St. Maarten for the route KLM flies) and back to the hub, it might not really look like a triangle that's just what they call it, and I'm not sure that the 47's that fly to SAN do the same but they probably have a lower weight limit and they are probably 100's and 200's because they don't need as much area to stop
ThePlaneGuy17 9 months ago
@ThePlaneGuy17 why does that make it lighter? couldnt they just start it as an empty fuel tank and then not fill it much.
packerbackerfan4 9 months ago
@packerbackerfan4 Well a plane can never start with an empty fuel tank, there is always a minimum amount of fuel every aircraft has to have on board, it varies depending on the aircraft. And it makes it lighter because the aircraft uses ever pound of fuel that its allowed to use, and theres probably less passengers and cargo on board because they might fly to a lower rated airport, that could also cause for a lower landing weight.
ThePlaneGuy17 9 months ago
cool im flying to sea on a 767
gemimijets13 9 months ago
where were you flyin to
hawk45653 10 months ago
LOVE that airplane!
motorcopjoe 11 months ago
great video, although it does look like a 767-200 rather than 300.
kimimm19 1 year ago
I have done this flight waaaay to many times! So tiring! But i'm sure the pilots are used to it! :) a lot territory in between ;)
duv420 1 year ago
ive flown out of there on that plane b4
STEELERBURGH 2 years ago
Since the 70s a number of airlines have brought their wide-bods to SanDiego. Delta 767s and L1011s. TWA 767s andLl1011s. American and United DC10s and 767s. British Airways 777s and 747s. And a few more..
jeffjonesing 2 years ago
Comment removed
jeffjonesing 2 years ago
Great Airport!!
jeffjonesing 2 years ago
wow i didn't know san diego had a long enough runway for the 767. Next for the 767 is john wayne :)
anush10 2 years ago 4
You are right, I was kind of surprised as well to know that we are going on 767. Well, now we know ;)
TalkingCoder 2 years ago
Actually we had a 747-400 delta airlines coming to San Diego a few months ago carrying a football team , also a few years ago 777 british airways use to come over here,
ivchosd 1 year ago
@anush10 we can accommodate MD-11's aswell, fedex uses MD-10's every friday, and everyone in a while a empty 747 leaves our airport.
wowdude999 1 year ago
@anush10 British Airways used to serve San Diego with 777's and 747's. Every once in a while there will be an A330 or 747 charter that serves SAN.
Erich64x2 1 year ago
@Erich64x2
Yeah, FED EX flies MD-11s out of there too, obviously at below the max gross weight. The runway is about 9000ft and some with the displaced threshold, so it's fine. Wrote that comment a while ago before thinking, or i might have confused SAN with SNA for a bit. So, when are those 767s coming to John Wayne? haha
anush10 1 year ago
@anush10 most of the time its a 727 or A310
hockeyman1119 1 year ago
@anush10 Takeoff run
at MTOW for 767 300 is 7900ft, the runway at San Diego is 9,400
familyguy958 1 year ago
@familyguy958
yeah, i know, my comment was put there a long time ago. Put it before referencing the length of lindbergh including the displaced threshold.
anush10 1 year ago
@anush10 actually SAN has a lot of 767's esp with cargo...every now and then 747s land there, and sometime in the near future hawaiian airlines planes to use their new a330s out of SAN
italianluvah83 1 year ago
did this flight have ptvs?
airlinepilotdude 2 years ago
If you mean private TV's in each seat, then yes.
TalkingCoder 2 years ago