Added: 2 years ago
From: TalkingCoder
Views: 9,447
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (29)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I love that flight, the 767 at san diego, a great sight, awesome video!!

  • I'm Sure 67's Can Only Land There From A Domestic Route, A 67 Wouldn't Be Able To Stop Fast Enough At Lindbergh If It Were Coming From Tokyo Or South America

  • @ThePlaneGuy17 1. that made no sense. it would have the same amount of gas left in it no matter where it came from because they fill it to an amount that it will have the same amount of gas leftover when it arrives.

    2. 777 and 787 are starting service into lindbergh.

    3. 777 has had service into lindbergh before.

    4. St. Maarten is 2000+ feet shorter on the runway and 747s land there.

    5. It takes longer to takeoff than to land because it is full of fuel.

    Thank you for your input anyway :)

  • @packerbackerfan4 actually the only reason 47's are able to land at st. maarten because both KLM and Coarsair fly a triangle route to make the aircraft lighter on landing so it stops in time

  • @ThePlaneGuy17 I didn't mean to sound rude in the last comment if it came out that way. I just read it again and realized it could have been interpreted as being rude. And what is this triangle route that u are talking about. Sometimes 747 cargo airplanes land at Lindbergh. Do they do triangle routes?

  • @packerbackerfan4 It's okay, I didnt take it wrong, and a triangle route is where an aircraft goes from a hub, to one airport, to another airport (Which would be St. Maarten for the route KLM flies) and back to the hub, it might not really look like a triangle that's just what they call it, and I'm not sure that the 47's that fly to SAN do the same but they probably have a lower weight limit and they are probably 100's and 200's because they don't need as much area to stop

  • @ThePlaneGuy17 why does that make it lighter? couldnt they just start it as an empty fuel tank and then not fill it much.

  • @packerbackerfan4 Well a plane can never start with an empty fuel tank, there is always a minimum amount of fuel every aircraft has to have on board, it varies depending on the aircraft. And it makes it lighter because the aircraft uses ever pound of fuel that its allowed to use, and theres probably less passengers and cargo on board because they might fly to a lower rated airport, that could also cause for a lower landing weight.

  • cool im flying to sea on a 767

  • where were you flyin to

  • LOVE that airplane!

  • great video, although it does look like a 767-200 rather than 300.

  • I have done this flight waaaay to many times! So tiring! But i'm sure the pilots are used to it! :) a lot territory in between ;)

  • ive flown out of there on that plane b4

  • Since the 70s a number of airlines have brought their wide-bods to SanDiego. Delta 767s and L1011s. TWA 767s andLl1011s. American and United DC10s and 767s. British Airways 777s and 747s. And a few more..

  • Comment removed

  • Great Airport!!

  • wow i didn't know san diego had a long enough runway for the 767. Next for the 767 is john wayne :)

  • You are right, I was kind of surprised as well to know that we are going on 767. Well, now we know ;)

  • Actually we had a 747-400 delta airlines coming to San Diego a few months ago carrying a football team , also a few years ago 777 british airways use to come over here,

  • @anush10 we can accommodate MD-11's aswell, fedex uses MD-10's every friday, and everyone in a while a empty 747 leaves our airport.

  • @anush10 British Airways used to serve San Diego with 777's and 747's. Every once in a while there will be an A330 or 747 charter that serves SAN.

  • @Erich64x2

    Yeah, FED EX flies MD-11s out of there too, obviously at below the max gross weight. The runway is about 9000ft and some with the displaced threshold, so it's fine. Wrote that comment a while ago before thinking, or i might have confused SAN with SNA for a bit. So, when are those 767s coming to John Wayne? haha

  • @anush10 most of the time its a 727 or A310

  • @anush10 Takeoff run

    at MTOW for 767 300 is 7900ft, the runway at San Diego is 9,400

  • @familyguy958

    yeah, i know, my comment was put there a long time ago. Put it before referencing the length of lindbergh including the displaced threshold.

  • @anush10 actually SAN has a lot of 767's esp with cargo...every now and then 747s land there, and sometime in the near future hawaiian airlines planes to use their new a330s out of SAN

  • did this flight have ptvs?

  • If you mean private TV's in each seat, then yes.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more