What most people don't realise is that a battleship is hardly any bigger a target than a modern cruiser,destroyer,or aircraft carrier,and packs much greater armored protection(enough to easily withstand modern missiles)and fires 2700lbs shells,not puny 98lbs!
yes a 16"/54 cal gun can toss a 2,300 lb shell 38 miles inland, but firing one into an urban environ gives you massive collateral damage. and from what the projections show, the AGS, if it lives up to it's hype will toss 2 98lb shells at a single building 110 miles from muzzle, with a CEP of less than 50m
what the hell kind of question is that, of course. A sniper is a high priority target, they can fuck up a mission with a single bullet. It's not overkill at all.
what happened to the electromagnetic rail gun that it was originally planned to be fitted with. i mean its accurate and it packs one hell of a punch after all its launched at hypersonic speeds
Missiles are too destructive for small targets, expensive and take a long time to plan. This weapon system can deliver 20+ lbs high explosive within GPS accuracy in 3 to 6 minutes from over 70 miles away!
bfd, there is no new technology here. these concepts are useless to the chinese. can you imagine them doing a "non-combatant evacuation?" i would rather have them stealing stuff like this they can not use rather than taking something important.
maybe but you'd think they could automate alot of the proceedure, more to the point I can see a battleship surviving being hit by a missile but not the DDX
But will it blend?
minuteman360 10 months ago
What most people don't realise is that a battleship is hardly any bigger a target than a modern cruiser,destroyer,or aircraft carrier,and packs much greater armored protection(enough to easily withstand modern missiles)and fires 2700lbs shells,not puny 98lbs!
TheJamesrocket 2 years ago
@TheJamesrocket
yes a 16"/54 cal gun can toss a 2,300 lb shell 38 miles inland, but firing one into an urban environ gives you massive collateral damage. and from what the projections show, the AGS, if it lives up to it's hype will toss 2 98lb shells at a single building 110 miles from muzzle, with a CEP of less than 50m
Dragonx0562 1 year ago
it's like a jdam, but delivered through a gun....and hundred jdam's at a time
midgetman2142 2 years ago
Its by BAE = British ;)
bri4u2906 2 years ago
@bri4u2906 It's by BAE North America, not the British side. It's american.
twinoceans 1 year ago
americans really are a breed apart.
patsyd80 2 years ago
would the navy really use a destroyer to take out snipers?
acslater017 4 years ago
you're right, i guess not :D
...IMO this Vid is just some kind of propaganda. It almost sounds like this gun is allmighty.
DroehnIng 4 years ago
yes. accuracy to within 1m. an AGS LR shell can have a blast radius to disable a sniper to within 10m.
jaymzanator 3 years ago
what the hell kind of question is that, of course. A sniper is a high priority target, they can fuck up a mission with a single bullet. It's not overkill at all.
stevo401401 3 years ago
what happened to the electromagnetic rail gun that it was originally planned to be fitted with. i mean its accurate and it packs one hell of a punch after all its launched at hypersonic speeds
panaf000 4 years ago
This is the electromagnetic railgun, I think.
asdfsdf2 4 years ago
No, the railgun's still experimental. The Navy does intend to put railguns into new ships, but the AGS is not the railgun.
JTissueXu 4 years ago
oh no way. missles for the win. way more efficient
mmmpie 4 years ago
Missiles are too destructive for small targets, expensive and take a long time to plan. This weapon system can deliver 20+ lbs high explosive within GPS accuracy in 3 to 6 minutes from over 70 miles away!
AdvGunSys 4 years ago
I thought we stopped using those helos..
Crimmyblues 5 years ago
this shit looks kooool another example of america owning GO AMERICA!
kevalst 5 years ago
It's great, too bad the ChiComs stole these plans years ago using spies like Katrina Leung and Wen Ho Lee.
AllTerroristsMustDie 5 years ago
bfd, there is no new technology here. these concepts are useless to the chinese. can you imagine them doing a "non-combatant evacuation?" i would rather have them stealing stuff like this they can not use rather than taking something important.
inskinner8er 4 years ago
HARD out
Daninkorea 5 years ago
maybe but you'd think they could automate alot of the proceedure, more to the point I can see a battleship surviving being hit by a missile but not the DDX
svaran 5 years ago
great display of naval support, thanks for posting trhe vid. Wouldn't they be better served just making their battleships 16inch guns AGS?
svaran 5 years ago
Battleships are huge targets. It's not worth it.
alexofjap 4 years ago