Thank you patrick! I missed some lecture and couldn't make it to the calc tables (tutors) cause i was sick. Trying to decipher my book can be a head ache. Wow, i think my hair stopped falling out.
I had to find the number of terms for an alternating series of (-1)^(n-1)*(1/n^3) to get an error of 0.01 and I just for the life of me couldn't figure out how to approximate the minimum numer of terms before i watched this!
I was expecting either an alternate estimate or an integral estimate to show up on my exam (that I took between my last comment and this one) but it didn't anyway
so for both taylor inequality theorem and this theorem, the size of the error is the next term? ex. summation of n=1 to n=4 term of a function will have an error less than or equal to n=5.
Hi Patrick, Thank U for your math video help. If I have a series starting with one to infinity of (-1)^n(n^n/n!), how dow I show that the series either diverges or converges using Alternating Series Test, generally I have problem with series involving factorials. Thank.
actually i noticed something with the second example here, apologies if this was already mentioned or if it's an invalid argument
but the 6th term would add 0.000023... to 0.098785...
that makes the new number 0.098808, with the next number substracting some part(probably smaller than 0.00001), so the 4th decimal is actually incorrect
@patrickJMT help!!!!!!! find the sum of the serier : sum from n=0, to infinity of (-1)^n 5/4^n and also another question i dont get: use the concept of a convergent geometric series to write the number 2.7181818.... as a ratio of two integers.....I dont get these two question and obviously my tutors at school dont get it either.....PLEASE Help i love your videos
(at 5:00) hey can some one explain to me how to take the limit of n/8^n as n goes to inifinity? not that i dont trust him... i suddenly blanked out... can somebody explain to me please? thank you
Thanks for the good review. We have an exam tomorrow in Calc 2 on infinite series. I've been trying to find information on how to determine whether the error for an alternating series estimation is an overestimate or an underestimate...
The theorem as stated is false. It might be true if you require b sub n to be monotonically decreasing. Example: consider b sub n = 1/n, n=1 to infinity. Now insert two 0 terms between b sub 2 and b sub 3. The series still converges to the same limit, and is still alternating, and b sub n still has limit 0 as n goes to infinity. Therefore, according to the thm. as stated, -0.5 (the sum of b sub 1 and b sub 2) is within 0 of the limit!
I recently had a friend of mine ask me to tutor them in Calc II, I was ok on most of the convergence/divergence problems, but I did not know where to go with this, I wish I ran across this sooner.
Looks like you have trouble writing you're sigma E. It is annoying to write. I am learning alternating series now by the way. Its certainly easier than most Calc topics.
I almost received a perfect score on my last differential equations test. My one mistake was using 'bn' instead of 'bn+1' when estimating the error on an alternating series. *face-palm*
hey Mr.patrick ....i watched all your videos for my calc-2 class last semester ....it really saved me from failing and i finally eneded up with B instead of F...!!! thanks a lot man...salute u ...and flowers...
Nah, you're good man. You said convergent, I'm sorry. I just look for exact stuff. But great video man. You made it really easy to understand. Keep it up!
in many books, when one first learns about alternating series, you do not yet know about absolute/conditional convergence, so i figure it would just confuse people to throw that terminology in there at that point
Oh yeah man no worries. You've got some great stuff here on youtube. Keep up the amazing work! We need people to spread the word of math. You do it very well.
Extremely helpful, thank you so much. I have a midterm on this tomorrow and you just explained this better in 10 minutes than what my professor could do in an hour long office hour session.
Thank you so much! I'm currently taking Calculus. My teacher is nice but her teaching style is not simple as yours. She teaches to get the lesson done so she can get her paycheck, not because she wants use to truly learn math. I visited your website and it helps A LOT. You made it so much easier. Thank you.
Making life easier for calc students everywhere
NKGENERATION 6 days ago
thank you!!!!!!!!!!!!!
kwazimoto44 1 week ago
Thank you so much. This went right over my head in class lol.
midnightstars0 2 weeks ago
your videos are now an essential part of my studying. Thank you very much!
chocochris93 1 month ago
Thank you Patrick! It is very helpful!!!
ceciliasmile 3 months ago
I have a test in an hour and didn't understand this stuff. Now I do. Thanks so much, you're my pre-test ritual.
klayworldsniper 3 months ago
Youre a boss Pat
geebauer 4 months ago 3
@geebauer just doin' what i can
patrickJMT 4 months ago 7
Hi Patrick. If I want to solve it algebraically, and within 0.001, do I set a of n equal to 0.001? Thanks
chulminh 4 months ago
Hi Patrick. If you don't mind could you help me please?
So I have to find 3 diffrent values of u
( (-1) ^n * (1/(1-u))* 4n ) / (2n)! = -1/2
I tried to do with estimation...but I have no idea...
then I tried to do limit comparaison, but it does not tell me the sum of the series.
or should I use Taylor theoreme?
Please I am literally begging you how to solve this.
Thank you
koreahiho 5 months ago
Is it correct to assume that this will work for an alternating power series as well, given a situation where we know what n and x equal?
jasonjkeller79 9 months ago
but how do we know which one will give the answer to four decimal places if were not allowed a calculator? xD
3MOloviie 10 months ago
Your result is not correct within 4 decimals - with an error of 0.000023 the actual result could be 0.098785 + 0.000023 which is 0.098808.
If you just take the first 4 decimals and compare them: 0987 =/= 0988.
GammahooX 10 months ago
But Patrick, if this method only works for alternating series then what do do for everything else?
YouGotSchenkd 10 months ago
THANK YOU SOOOOOOO MUCH THIS WAS SO HELPFUL!!!! i finally understand this thank you!!!!!
theotheroleander 10 months ago
Wait... how do you know which term is the first neglected term?
ronniemonnie 10 months ago
@ronniemonnie nevermind
I really need to learn to just watch the videos all the way through
ronniemonnie 10 months ago
This was soooo helpful! I was stuck on a problem like this for a half hour and you saved me in 30 seconds!!
xrockerchick4lifex 10 months ago
Thank you patrick! I missed some lecture and couldn't make it to the calc tables (tutors) cause i was sick. Trying to decipher my book can be a head ache. Wow, i think my hair stopped falling out.
skunkyconkey 11 months ago
iloveyouiloveyouiloveyou
falastinicoor 11 months ago
I've used your videos to replace my AP Calc teacher :) I think I have a chance of passing the AP Calculus BC test now :O
akmcferran 11 months ago
I just found your videos, Great work man!
I'm studying for my calc 2 test tomorrow and the only thing I didn't understand was this estimation theorem. (missed that class)
Now I get it and I'm confident for my test. Thanks!
NMShredder1080 11 months ago
learned this in 10 minutes what wud actualy take 1 hour if i tried learning from the book.
thanks!
hen555 11 months ago
I LOVE YOU PATRICK!!!
blkfsty555 11 months ago
THANK YOU SO MUCH. I was so lost before this
I had to find the number of terms for an alternating series of (-1)^(n-1)*(1/n^3) to get an error of 0.01 and I just for the life of me couldn't figure out how to approximate the minimum numer of terms before i watched this!
crazycanadian132 1 year ago
Error is at most size of first neglected term
That makes a lot of sense. Why bother with the whole rn > s-sn? I should tell my prof to just say that. <__<
iammaxhailme 1 year ago 3
@iammaxhailme well, this only works for alternating estimation theorem
patrickJMT 1 year ago
@patrickJMT
I was expecting either an alternate estimate or an integral estimate to show up on my exam (that I took between my last comment and this one) but it didn't anyway
iammaxhailme 1 year ago
thank you
ammarshaikh1000 1 year ago
thank you
ammarshaikh1000 1 year ago
this 10 minute video was more helpful than my professor explaining for 2 hours.
lilitrichie 1 year ago
u are the BEST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
23youwatch 1 year ago
so for both taylor inequality theorem and this theorem, the size of the error is the next term? ex. summation of n=1 to n=4 term of a function will have an error less than or equal to n=5.
fhunkymonkey 1 year ago
@fhunkymonkey no, taylor's theorem does not work that way; it is a bit more complicated
patrickJMT 1 year ago
Awesome. I missed class Thursday, so now I'm getting caught up. This theorem is actually really cool when you think about it.
FaiththeHairstylist 1 year ago
@FaiththeHairstylist yep, and it makes total sense!
patrickJMT 1 year ago
the pinnacle of social media importance is right here. u sir, are awesome.
ShivMan007 1 year ago
@ShivMan007 ha, thanks : )
patrickJMT 1 year ago
U are a milllion times more helpful than my Calc Prof!! Thanks! :)
varung92 1 year ago
Thanx it was helpfull..
ea33ie 1 year ago
omg so simple...thats not how it was in my text!
fizzmaverick 1 year ago
love u!
alrasw 1 year ago
Hi Patrick, Thank U for your math video help. If I have a series starting with one to infinity of (-1)^n(n^n/n!), how dow I show that the series either diverges or converges using Alternating Series Test, generally I have problem with series involving factorials. Thank.
saqajaan1 1 year ago
actually i noticed something with the second example here, apologies if this was already mentioned or if it's an invalid argument
but the 6th term would add 0.000023... to 0.098785...
that makes the new number 0.098808, with the next number substracting some part(probably smaller than 0.00001), so the 4th decimal is actually incorrect
siriusblack9999 1 year ago
Thank you so much for your videos. Great for quick review!
3Daybreaker 1 year ago
I just noticed that there should be a minus sign after the 6th term :)...but anyways your video is awesome
NicholasAABBoy 1 year ago
hehe ;)
cacaloveforever 1 year ago
lol writing in wet erase markers ;)
cacaloveforever 1 year ago
@cacaloveforever i have gone back to the sharpie and paper
patrickJMT 1 year ago
@patrickJMT help!!!!!!! find the sum of the serier : sum from n=0, to infinity of (-1)^n 5/4^n and also another question i dont get: use the concept of a convergent geometric series to write the number 2.7181818.... as a ratio of two integers.....I dont get these two question and obviously my tutors at school dont get it either.....PLEASE Help i love your videos
ecaep86 1 year ago
Thank you thank you thank you! I had mono and missed all these lectures, and the book wasn't really helping me but you made it really easy.
pshhockeyplaya 1 year ago
thanks so much...your videos are really helpful!!
MrJsnL211 1 year ago
(at 5:00) hey can some one explain to me how to take the limit of n/8^n as n goes to inifinity? not that i dont trust him... i suddenly blanked out... can somebody explain to me please? thank you
jieun7543 1 year ago
Comment removed
MrJsnL211 1 year ago
Thanks for the good review. We have an exam tomorrow in Calc 2 on infinite series. I've been trying to find information on how to determine whether the error for an alternating series estimation is an overestimate or an underestimate...
astrobiologist 1 year ago
what I say?:)
You are awesome
al7rbi1981 2 years ago 5
still dont get it i must be slow
kevinkk26 2 years ago
@kevinkk26 What part don't u get? Do u
understand what the theorem means? Do
u know what alternating means? Do u not
see y it is true? The video doesn't cover the
proof of the theorem.
dirtybitbucket 1 year ago
Thank you, your instructions are clear and coherent! It makes perfect sense, and I definitely understood this at an applicable level!
Be my teacher!
buttman20 2 years ago 2
arse of n. awesome.
jlahey1 2 years ago
Thank you
cutcub 2 years ago
Comment removed
dirtybitbucket 2 years ago
In the first example, he added a +1 to the ^n, making his signs right. (at 2:05)
theone2088 2 years ago
Thx. I didn't see the +1.
dirtybitbucket 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Really (!) corrected comment:
The theorem as stated is false. It might be true if you require b sub n to be monotonically decreasing. Example: consider b sub n = 1/n, n=1 to infinity. Now insert two 0 terms between b sub 2 and b sub 3. The series still converges to the same limit, and is still alternating, and b sub n still has limit 0 as n goes to infinity. Therefore, according to the thm. as stated, -0.5 (the sum of b sub 1 and b sub 2) is within 0 of the limit!
dirtybitbucket 2 years ago
Comment removed
dirtybitbucket 2 years ago
Comment removed
dirtybitbucket 2 years ago
Comment removed
dirtybitbucket 2 years ago
I recently had a friend of mine ask me to tutor them in Calc II, I was ok on most of the convergence/divergence problems, but I did not know where to go with this, I wish I ran across this sooner.
noyce job mate
Nanumir 2 years ago
you are sooo helpful my teacher didn't go over this in class and then put it on the test
readnoar 2 years ago
lol
sohaib785 2 years ago
Looks like you have trouble writing you're sigma E. It is annoying to write. I am learning alternating series now by the way. Its certainly easier than most Calc topics.
SevereTstormFan 2 years ago
I almost received a perfect score on my last differential equations test. My one mistake was using 'bn' instead of 'bn+1' when estimating the error on an alternating series. *face-palm*
roni51154 2 years ago
near perfect sounds quite alright to me : )
patrickJMT 2 years ago
thanks! it is clear now
fiorellavt1 3 years ago
hey! a 'B' is good! nice job! : )
patrickJMT 3 years ago
hey Mr.patrick ....i watched all your videos for my calc-2 class last semester ....it really saved me from failing and i finally eneded up with B instead of F...!!! thanks a lot man...salute u ...and flowers...
harrypatel910 3 years ago
This would be awesome for me, unfortunately we arent allowed a calculator in my calc class.
roflcopter76 3 years ago
Nah, you're good man. You said convergent, I'm sorry. I just look for exact stuff. But great video man. You made it really easy to understand. Keep it up!
Calculusman08 3 years ago
ahhh ok, it is conditionally convergent : )
in many books, when one first learns about alternating series, you do not yet know about absolute/conditional convergence, so i figure it would just confuse people to throw that terminology in there at that point
patrickJMT 3 years ago
Oh yeah man no worries. You've got some great stuff here on youtube. Keep up the amazing work! We need people to spread the word of math. You do it very well.
Calculusman08 3 years ago
thanks and thanks!
you going to study math in college?
patrickJMT 3 years ago
Am, lol. I'm a math major now. I'm in Calculus 2 now. I'm taking Calc 3 and Probability next semester. What's your story?
Calculusman08 3 years ago
my story is short and boring
patrickJMT 3 years ago
Oh, nothing big, but the alternating harmonic series is actually conditionally convergent. I just wanted to say that. thanks.
Calculusman08 3 years ago
did i say something different - i do not want to watch it all and find it out
patrickJMT 3 years ago
Extremely helpful, thank you so much. I have a midterm on this tomorrow and you just explained this better in 10 minutes than what my professor could do in an hour long office hour session.
You are a god of math, good sir. Keep it up!
santaslick 3 years ago
ha! god of math! not quite, but i appreciate the nice words all the same! good luck on your midterm!!
patrickJMT 3 years ago
were you doing those 8-powers in your head or calculator?
brco2003 3 years ago
Thanks so much for posting. Very clear
hyp3o 3 years ago
Thank you so much! I'm currently taking Calculus. My teacher is nice but her teaching style is not simple as yours. She teaches to get the lesson done so she can get her paycheck, not because she wants use to truly learn math. I visited your website and it helps A LOT. You made it so much easier. Thank you.
love2CUsmile86 3 years ago
you are amazing
steveofreeblind 3 years ago
ha! thanks : )
patrickJMT 3 years ago