I agree with the logic of the video: Amino acids are incredibly simple and can be as small as 10 bonded atoms. They're a long way from proteins ... and an ever longer way from a complete cell. And if you have a complete cell what makes it live?
Wow just wow. We know that amino acids are the building blocks of life. The fact that we can create these amino acids in a lab with the tools a primitive earth had pretty much puts a TON of weight onto abiogenesis.
The argument that scientists replicate the occurence is about as logical as saying since we can clone a sheep that means a sheep god creates each born sheep.
How do you go from the building blocks of life to life? I mean, even the simplist single cell organisms are very complex and each part must work in conjunction with the other parts all at the same time. I'd like to see scientists come up with a proof of the amino acids forming into the correct sequences to form the correct proteins for each part that must be formed correctly and work in tandem with other parts and cannot be autonomous.
Educated arguments AntiVirus -- The barb and bravado -- Cussing and rhetoric -- speak for themselves. Interesting how you just flip out the notion that first life arose "naturally," when no scientists will actually go there (evolutionary theory only deals with change after first life) -- But I'm the idiot because I won't follow your faith statement -- Help me with the origin of cosmos, physics, chemicals, life, consciousness, mind, morality -- But don't give me fundamentalist faith statements...
@reflect7 as i debunk some of the evolutionist on youtube they would say " there has ben tons of more recent experiments done on behalf of abiogenesis". it doesn't matter how much technology is growing, 1+1 will always =2 and ultraviolet rays will always wipe out ammonia without the present of ozone.
You, just like any other fundy christian piece of shit, censor all your videos because you know you have no argument. I know you won't approve this or my previous comment. This is just a message to you. This is a modern age. Our world is evolving. We don't need cavemen like you trying to bring the world back into the dark ages. Get a fucking education.
What an idiot. This guy needs an education. If you don't believe life can happen naturally. Then who created your creator? He's always existed? A very very poor argument. There would have to be a point where something was created naturally. And simple life being created naturally is a hell of a lot more probable then a god being created naturally. Something that's suppose to be infinitely intelligent just poof'd into existence? I don't think so. You should try thinking instead of praying.
@urantivirus then we both would believe in a super natural event..cause and effect..big bang..where did the energy come from?..God would have not been created naturally..but ever present..and eternal.
One other thing. This presumably took place in an aqueous milieu; any newly formed molecules would very likely have been protected from degredation by tars or other destructive molecules through dilution in the primeval oceans...reaction kinetics would have been adversely affected by the reduced concentration.
Of course we're still a long way from forming proteins or DNA/RNA. But the experiments prove it's possible to get the starting materials through natural processes.
I agree with the logic of the video: Amino acids are incredibly simple and can be as small as 10 bonded atoms. They're a long way from proteins ... and an ever longer way from a complete cell. And if you have a complete cell what makes it live?
joshualcoombe 1 year ago
Wow just wow. We know that amino acids are the building blocks of life. The fact that we can create these amino acids in a lab with the tools a primitive earth had pretty much puts a TON of weight onto abiogenesis.
The argument that scientists replicate the occurence is about as logical as saying since we can clone a sheep that means a sheep god creates each born sheep.
Its retarded and he knows it.
JetpackNinjaDinosaur 2 years ago
Your argument stems from ignorance.
Split539 2 years ago
How do you go from the building blocks of life to life? I mean, even the simplist single cell organisms are very complex and each part must work in conjunction with the other parts all at the same time. I'd like to see scientists come up with a proof of the amino acids forming into the correct sequences to form the correct proteins for each part that must be formed correctly and work in tandem with other parts and cannot be autonomous.
TheSmoonge 3 years ago
Educated arguments AntiVirus -- The barb and bravado -- Cussing and rhetoric -- speak for themselves. Interesting how you just flip out the notion that first life arose "naturally," when no scientists will actually go there (evolutionary theory only deals with change after first life) -- But I'm the idiot because I won't follow your faith statement -- Help me with the origin of cosmos, physics, chemicals, life, consciousness, mind, morality -- But don't give me fundamentalist faith statements...
reflect7 3 years ago
@reflect7 as i debunk some of the evolutionist on youtube they would say " there has ben tons of more recent experiments done on behalf of abiogenesis". it doesn't matter how much technology is growing, 1+1 will always =2 and ultraviolet rays will always wipe out ammonia without the present of ozone.
kissntellen 1 year ago
You, just like any other fundy christian piece of shit, censor all your videos because you know you have no argument. I know you won't approve this or my previous comment. This is just a message to you. This is a modern age. Our world is evolving. We don't need cavemen like you trying to bring the world back into the dark ages. Get a fucking education.
urantivirus 3 years ago 7
What an idiot. This guy needs an education. If you don't believe life can happen naturally. Then who created your creator? He's always existed? A very very poor argument. There would have to be a point where something was created naturally. And simple life being created naturally is a hell of a lot more probable then a god being created naturally. Something that's suppose to be infinitely intelligent just poof'd into existence? I don't think so. You should try thinking instead of praying.
urantivirus 3 years ago
@urantivirus then we both would believe in a super natural event..cause and effect..big bang..where did the energy come from?..God would have not been created naturally..but ever present..and eternal.
5tonyvvvv 1 year ago
One other thing. This presumably took place in an aqueous milieu; any newly formed molecules would very likely have been protected from degredation by tars or other destructive molecules through dilution in the primeval oceans...reaction kinetics would have been adversely affected by the reduced concentration.
Of course we're still a long way from forming proteins or DNA/RNA. But the experiments prove it's possible to get the starting materials through natural processes.
maxhardcase 3 years ago