Then comes battle for Marasti where our advance started.
In 1919 the Romano-Hungarian war and the conques of Budapest
In 1941 the retake of Bessarabia and Transnistria, in an alliance with Nazi Germany, against the soviet armies.
In 1944, when we turned against the germans, the retake of Northern Transylvania, all alone, against their best divisions, and the eliberation of Budapest with the Soviet armies. In 1945 the eliberation of Wien and Czechoslovakia.
Nu vreau sa par tradator de neam si patrie dar informatia nu este prea corecta. Janos Hunyadi (Ioan de Hunedoara) nu era roman oricat de mult ar vrea unii. La rovine nu fost victorie, ca Mircea o pierdut tronu si calugareni a fost iar o batalie indecisa. e adevarat ca micile armate muntene au reusit sa reziste destul de bine superioritatii numerice a otomanilor dar nu au obtinut o victorie.
@fiintaumana Nu pari tradator,pari doar prost informat.Sau,in fine,ce visezi tu noaptea,le dai ziua ca fapte sigure.Mai citeste,mai mediteaza,si apoi intoarce-te sa ne iluminezi cu adevarurile tale absolute.
@MrCraiessou Inseaman ca parti bune din istoria neamului roman sunt defapt rezultatul viselor mele.credeam ca intradevar a existat un Vlad Uzurpatorul pe tronul Tarii Romanesti, dar este imposibil deoarece Mircea a invins. De asemenea vicoria lui Mihai la Calugareni trebuie sa fi fost atat de mare incat Imperiul Otoman a platit Tarii Romane tribut pentru urmatoarele 2 secole. Iar Ioan/Iancu de Hunedoara a fost un atat de bun ortodox si vorbitor de lb. romana incat a umplut Ardealul de manastiri
@fiintaumana Si ce importanta au aceste episoade marunte care nu au schimbat cu nimic sensul istoriei noastre,acela de a exista ca popor cu propria limba,credinta,organizare politica,chiar daca a trebuit sa platim 'Taxa de protectie"unor natiuni mafiote.Stramosii nostri au luptat si cu arma si cu creierul pentru tara lor si atata timp cat nu vorbesti turceste,maghiara,slava,eu zic ca lupta lor a fost destul de victorioasa.Iancu avea sange romanesc dar conditiile din Ardeal au fost mai complexe.
@MrCraiessou Tocmai, avem o istorie foarte interesanta, care ne deosebeste de toti vecinii, aven eroi si momente de glorie si nu trebuie sa exageram unele evenimente pentru a avea motive de mandrie.Cat despre Avram Iancu, el este unul dintre personajele din istoria noatra caruia nu i se poate reprosa nimic, un adevarat erou al Europei, nu doar al Romaniei si nu un sovin cum l-ar vrea unii care tot fac marsuri si manifestatii si fac referiri la el chiar daca nu il inteleg.
@fiintaumana Nu stiu despre nici un mars sau manifestatie avandu-l ca tema pe Iancu de Hunedoara.Poate te referi la Avram Iancu,ca simbol al luptei nationale a romanilor din Transilvania.Oricum,nu sunt manifestatii sovine,a te opune strainului care doreste sa te conduca in propria ta tara nu e sovinism.
@MrFefefofo you are partially correct. the polish king promised but to send soldiers but in the end he did not send any. that caused him a great deal of problems at home after the victory.
hungary only sent a few hundred mercenaries, and that was only so that the king would save face with the pope not because he actually wanted to help the country he later intended to conquer. the only real outside aid that stefan had was from the sekely volunteers who numbered somewhere in the low thousands.
@adijarca As I know from romanians that ca 4000 seclers 2000 polishes and ca 1000 hungarains supported Stephan. But these forces were "professionals, and not farmers with "kasza"
Hungary never wanted to conquer Moldva, becasue this pricipality was made by the assistace of the hungarains. And was tributary of the Hungarain Kingdom.
As Stephan was also. 3 days after the battle of Moldvabánya, he was in front of Mátyás and made fealty. He was realpolitician and sow that together is easier than
@MrFefefofo You seem to enjoy so much your paranoid onanist dreams about your alleged supremacy !.Romanians Principalities always rejected treaties with Magyars and fought back your stupid incursions.Transylvania is the only Romanian land you succeeded to implant for a short while your 'Assistance"But Turkey took care of you and pulverised Hungary.You became a turkish province,while Romanian Principalities remained Independent kingdoms just under vassality treaties with Turkey.
@MrCraiessou Principalities as Kindgdom? Ehh. Even you do not know the form of Moldva, and Wallachia? The romanains arrived to Avas, because the hungarains invited them, to live in hungary and their function was to save the north east boarder. That was the reason they did not pay tax there similar to the saxons and seclers. Some time after they settled in MAramaros many of the INCLUDING hungarain groups were sent to Bukovina with the same task.
@MrCraiessou Turkey really did not occupy Moldva, but the tax was so huge for centuries that the romanians and serbs were the purest people in europe 150 years ago.
that time 98% of the romanains were analfabet, but in Hungary 200 years ago there were even gymnasiums for they. Not speaking about the Bible that was translated for the romanains on hungarain cost. What are you speaking about?
@MrCraiessou During the ottomans Hungary still had many castles that was under hungaraian hands, and Hungary did not pay any tax for the ottomans. As the romanains did for century.
Until the XV century the Moldavian Principality was a hungarain tributary. As Stephan cel Mare aslo. Who had some castle in Transilvania for his great service against the ottomans. similar to Vlad Tepes.
@MrFefefofo The only great powers in that time were Turcs and Poles,Hungarians were very small and insignificant.Magyars betrayed their old religion and became Catholic and Poles vassals.Stephen had to worry about the Lechia(Poland) and Sultan.He deliberately chose at the end the Turkish power,in exchange for independence and preserving the religion.Turcs were never allowed to settle or make mosquees in Romanian land,we only paid them out with money.Then Austria and Russia rised,never Hungary
@MrCraiessou what period are you talking about? After 1526-1541 or before.
Until 1490 the hungarian army was the greates army in europe. It was professional army.
And if the Poles were so big power, why the hugnarians frequently went to help them?
Even after 1700????
The turks had to be not present in Romanains beacuase the romanains payed the tax as a good student. The turks were present where they needed the military forces to collect the taxes. As in Hungary.
@MrCraiessou if Hu. had payed the tax, the ottomans would have not been present.
they needed the forces to collect the tax.
And do not forget. Until the russians pushed out the ottomans, Romanians was a kind of slave. Do you know who were the janicsar in the Rumelian army????
@MrFefefofo You are delusional,my friend,like all Hungarians.You were mercenaries,the west powers employed you for a while as cannon flesh slaves.But you were so bad as tacticians so they took hands off you and let you easy pray for turcs.Don't fool yourself,Romanians are a very old,very strong and wise nation,we stay in our land not only by comfronting big bullies in a suicidal manner but also by diplomacy.Hungary is a small weak country with megalomanic dreams,you need a psychiatric cure.
@MrCraiessou If somebody is under a certain level, like you are now, usually I do not answare. Offending the other nations seems to be a new natioal sport - near the old one - of the romanains. If they are out of argue they start to do that. Please try to stay to be gentlamen.
The ethnogenesis or the romanias started some hundred years ago, and finished ca 200 years ago. The romanians were trashuming sheepherds on the balkan, that is the reason there is so few documents about them in teh past.
@MrCraiessou we had no any problem with the russian until 1849. If they had not came here to help the habsburgs, Hungary would be today the Hungarian kindom, the paradise of all people living under the hungarian crown.
From that time the russian are not honest in the eyes of the hungarians.
Look after the story of Arad....you know then why.
@MrFefefofo The "schools" you had were nothing but Catholic missionarism Propaganda.Magyars never had a strong original spiritual life,they were an easy pray for Catholic and Protestant missionarism.While our rural culture was/is the strongest and oldest in Europe,our peasants were trained in folk music,poems,wood and costume art - we did not sold our arhaic Romanian identity like you did.Magyar barbarians burnt down on cannon balls 300 Romanian monasteries as cultural centres in Transylvania.
@MrCraiessou Ok dear , list here some romanian churches that was burnded by the hugarains. Be streight man and after standing something certainly you can list here some of the monostries what the hugnarians burned.
Dear The hungarians were not so stupid to burn that was in their country.
But list here please some.
Do you think about Gyulafehérvár, that was burned by Vlad Tepes in cooperation by the ottomans?
@MrFefefofo I was not insulting you,I was giving you a diagnostic,dear friend.You HUngarians worry me a lot.You seem rather normal but your only hobby is to enter Romanian videos or post your own clips with greatest historical aberrations, a display of a confusional state of mind.There is nothing nomadic about us,love,we are the oldest and the most sedentaric nation in the area.We have a very old history in the Danubian-Carpathian basin and all you say about us is sheer mentaly ill propaganda.
@MrCraiessou Let my doctor to give diagnostic about me, please, OK? Until I do not give about you. I am chating to some romanains here, and who I can convince to read some scientic publication about the history of transilvania based on arheology, toponimy, historical documents, they are not so sure about the daco-romanian continutity dear, aspecially about the place of it, that is Transilvania.
@MrFefefofo Yeah,sure,now it's late in the evening,it's time for your bedtime stories!Of course you are not told in your history books what kind of bastards you were towards the people you occupied.Your so-called Crown was not 'Heaven" was HELL for all Romanians and Slavs robbed by you.Is difficult for you to accept that you are a desperate savage tribe from arid steppes,pillaging and robbing your way through central Europe.Difficult to accept that even Pannonia is not yours,is an occupied land.
@MrCraiessou All land on the globe is occupied land. All. The hungarians were so bastard to the romanians that hungarain man made the first bible for the romanians.
In 1800 gymnasyums were for the romanains in Hungary while in the "free" Moldva, and oltenia 98% of the pople were analfabet that time. The first romanains lenguage book was printed in Budapest. The most famous romanian inventor learned in the same university in Budapest where I did.
@MrCraiessou Don't you have problem with Spain dear? What a special right do the romanians have in spain today? There are ca 2 million strawberry pickers. I do not know any romanian lnguage gymnasium for them.. The romanains arrived to hungary becasue the wished better life then in the Balkan or in Wallachia and Moldva. thei migration is still going on from the IX century. Romanian origin villages appeared east from the Don and in the chaucasus. That is not ancient dacian land is it?
@MrFefefofo Give me a break with your religious propaganda books!Moldova and Oltenia has Unesco World Heritage medieval monasteries with incredible painting and arhitecture beauty.You savages destroyed Romanian art and culture in Transylvania,banned Romanians to enter cities and build in stone(so,the wood wonders of Maramures and Apuseni appeared)try to magyarised and brainwashed Romanians via your stupid schools.Music and art and literature flourished in free Romania,not in your savage Crown
@MrCraiessou Read the book I sent you on you page. You will not dream anymore about the daco-romanian continuity anymore, that is sure. Read the fact, Read the historical facts, and do not believe for some dream of many romanian historiant that stand a false theory that they never can prove.
The archeology is one of the keypoint here , dear. Tha archeology could not present until today one settlement in Transilvania, where romanains lived between the VIII-XII century. They lived on the balkan .
@MrFefefofo Only the King of Idiots could believe that fertile great Dacia remained empty to wait for Uralian-Uyguryan mongrels,while little arid Albania or something hatched two nations,the 4 millions Albanians nation and the great 28 millions DacoRomanian living NorthDanube in their Dacia-Romania.Desperate people,Hungarians!Transylvania is full of Dacian,DacoRomanian and Romanian settlements.Read hundreds of volumes written by great Romanian historians from all times, or just shut up!
@MrFefefofo We have no problem with Spain.Romanians go to West to earn extramoney,very few want to build a life there.They work as seasonal workers and send money home to their children/ family.Even if they like to settle there,they are very able and willing to learn the language and the customs of their new country.The 28 millions Romanians live in RO and Rep.Moldova and in region near border(East Tizsa-Hungary,NorthBukovina Ukraine and TimocSerbia)It's a round and compact historical territory
@MrCraiessou@MrFefefofo Look . I talked to romanains , and I did not find any who want to go home...They were from Buchurest,, from Temesvár. etc. Ask them first. When they will go back? If the money will be more at home. That never will be more.
The pareants die and the grandchildren borning in Spain will never go back to Romanian. As from the US 1% went back.
@MrCraiessou they migrated there from South of SAVA-Danube river as KAkamenous stated, to the northe. The first groups arrived to MAramaros,and Fogaras, and from maramaros they went to Bukovina as the Hungarian king ordered, and settled there. Their function was simple. Saving the border ot the hungarian kingdom. As that was in the Szörényi Bánság too.
Not the romanians arrived to hungary that time only. Italians, germans, saxons, komans, besenyős, etc etc
@MrFefefofo :D:D:D Again i catch you lying! Kekemenous mentions the migration was from NORTH to SOUTH! Is there any point of lying?? All the people can check and see the truth so what's the point?? Remember:
"The Vlachs were conquered by Emperor Trajan who had defeated and annihilated them.Their king, named Decebal, was killed."
Remember these words?? It's our old friend Kekemenous! Aaaa sory it was actualy Decebalus the "Hungarian king" like Naddeo says ahahahahahahahahahhahahahahah
@MrFefefofo , Kekemenous says that the Vlachs are Dacians and Bessi who fleed because of the Romans and enstablished in the inhospitable places where Serbs live! Read Naddeo's website my dear friend ahahaha you're hungarian and you dindn't even read his website ahahaha. He says that Decebalus was a "Hungarian king". And BTW i'm Barack Obama !! :D:D:D
@MrFefefofo Big mistake,my Fefefofo fluffy friend.! TRansylvania is HOME for any Romanian,Transylvania is ROMANIA.The 5 % Hungarian-speaking population (Magyars,Szeklers and HUngarian GYpsies) are free to go in their National state HUngary.If you don't like Romania have a nice trip to the countries of your dreams!
In the 11th century Transylvania was inhabited in majority by Romanians. The oldest Hungarian chronicle, "Gesta Hungarorum" written by Anonymus, mentions that Hungarians conquered this land from Romanians. Simon de Keza, another Hungarian, says the same. When did Simon de Keza (a Hungarian) write that Romanians were an ancient people who lived in Transylvania long before Hungarians? At the time when your today historians claim that the Vlahs migrated in Transylvania!
So Simon de Keza must have been an eye witness of the Vlach "migration from Balkans to Transylvania" and yet he writes that those Vlachs inhabited Transylvania long before Hungarians came... How come?! Explain that to me!
At least 200 or even 300 settlements from 4th century AD to 7th century AD have been found in the territory of Roman Dacia which prove the continuity of the daco-roman population after 274 AD. In the territory of the "free Dacians" cca 800 Dacian settlements have been found! For 3rd-5th centuries AD: 140 settlements and cemeteries in Moldova, 134 in Wallachia, 66 in Transylvania. For 6th-7th centuries AD: 227 in Moldova, 52 in Wallachia, 91 in Transylvania => over 700 settlements and cemeteries!
@teo208 focus ont he IX-XI periode. I do not care any settlements at the V. century. Aspecially no one are proven to be romanains in transilvania even from the age. But let's focus on IX-XI ok?
Let'S go !!! I ask only 5. But call these five on its name on that time!!!!!
Show the mortal remain of one !!!! only one romanians from that time !!!!
All these settlements and cemeteries I talked about are daco-roman settlements and cemeteries, I didn't include the settlements and cemeteries of the migratory tribes among them.
@teo208 Anonimus this case was not right, his fantasy created historicala pesrsons like Gelou or others based on settlement names. Exactly how he originated the name of the hungarians from Ungvár town, In his time the comans were also arrived and he did not know when so he thought the comans were also here together with the wlachs. He was not accurate man. Read him carefully.
@MrFefefofo Some important Romanian monasteries burned down and destroyed in Transylvania in 1761-1762:Prislop<Plosca,Bucium,Sambata de sus,Voievodeni,Ramet,Afteia,Sanmartinu de Campie,Lapus,Lainici,Cartisoara,Rohhita,BunaVestire,Dejani,Berivoienii Mari and all village churches in their area.The process started with the Orthodox Cathedral of Alba Iulia,burned down in 1716.On net you can find a complete list of all 288 Romanian monasteries and village churches destroyed in Transylvania.
If you read books - other than magyar propaganda bullshit - you would know that:
1. Dacian tribes lived also east of Dniester (ruins of ancient dacian "dave" have been found east of Dniester.
2. In the 16th - 17th centuries and in the 18th - 19th centuries many Romanians left Moldova for Ukraine and north of Black See respectivly because of Ottoman rule etc.
3. There were several mass deportation of Romanians from Bessarabia to Siberia.
@MrCraiessou Do you mean the one of the oldest education center of europe in Nagyenyed, what was burned byt the romanains including one of the oldest bibliotec of europe? The romanains did on the fromt with Axente Sever who was well educated in hungarain schools what to put on fire.
@MrFefefofo The most important was the Orthodox Cathedral of AlbaIulia,burnt down in 1714,the spiritual center of Romanians.Then RO.priests were tortured to give up their faith.Because Romanians heroically resisted gen. vonBukow ordered the Magyar regiments in Transylvania to burn down(the ones in wood) or destroy with cannon balls(The one in stones)ALL Orthodox Romanian churches in TR.,Magyars were so happy with this savagery that they destroyed even Oltenian churches near border(f.ex Lainici)
@MrCraiessou in 1711 hungary lost the "Rákóczy freedom war against the habsburgs, 95% of the castles were exploded by the habsburgs after it, there were not hungarain military forces that time. I do not know what you are speaking about.
I was expected a list of the settlements where the hungarians burned one ortodox church, but you say all. The answare is not accepted , sorry.
Vlad Tepes, really burned the churches in Alba Iulia.
@MrFefefofo , haha you are really persistent Mr Fefe :D Unfortunately for you Gelu did exist and as a direct archeological confirmation is its fortress from Dabaca. Moreover Anonymus is worldwide accepted even by many Hungarian historians. Anonymus didn't have any logical reason to lie and describe in so much DETAIL the entire conquest of Transylvania. Nestor confirms him saying how Magyars from East came and battled with Vlachs and Slavs inhabiting these lands. Oupsie.
@gogoasacenusie Gyalu as settlement name was exist in the time of anonimus, and he gave from thiis name Gelou.
Around Doboca nothing have been found proving that there were a man called Gelou. For Example in Zalavár cirill texts have been vound proving that Cirrill or Method was there !!!
Anonimus did not want to lie. But he had to write the story, that time gesta, to sy. and he used his fantasy based on what he could se around hungary. Hungarians fighted the comans too. ??????? is it true? no
@MrFefefofo , and by the way, remember Posada battle where Hungarian king escaped from Romanians dressed as a woman? :))) The most embarrassing moment in the history of Europe :D
Sry again Mr Fefe. Back to library and learn history.
@MrFefefofo , delight yourself with this Mr Fefe:
".......Between the 10th and 14th centuries new political formations emerged in the Carpathian-Danube region. The Hungarians, who had settled in Pannonia at the end of the 9th century and who entered Dacia in the 10th century, overwhelmed the Slavic-Romanian duchies, or voivodates, that they encountered there."
@gogoasacenusie First of all look after how the Britannica Enciclopedy has been maintained. It is written by the national academies, so this is not new for the hungarian what the romanains wrote there. This book is not th eplace of historical argues.
in the X century there were no wlach in Tranxilvania. this can be proven for example by the toponimes.
the first romanian name of a village appears in the VIX century in document. All other have nor romanian origin.
@gogoasacenusie I told you, The chapter was written by romanains.
One year was not enough for you to list some settlements where tyou can prove romanains lived in 900 in Transilvania. Is is so hard? just for you. The romanian archeologists excavated ca 1 year ago again a huge cementery near Gyuéafehérvár... Clearly proven than the battle between István and Gyula had happened, The cemeterz is from ca 1000 and the people died in battel. This is sg what is true !!!! where are the romanains?
@MrFefefofo , yeah Mr Fefe! The Romanian propaganda machine paid Britannica Enciclopedy and the entire planet to write this "version" of history! Hahah Listen to Abba - The winner takes it all very nice song!!! :D
"Hungary, at home doesn't acknowledge the Treaty of Trianon. The education of the youth is done in the spirit of revenge. For such a small people, even the idea of revenge against the bigger powers is quite hilarious"
@MrFefefofo , yeah Mr Fefe! The Romanian propaganda machine paid Britannica Enciclopedy and the entire planet to write this "version" of history! Hahah Listen to Abba - The winner takes it all very nice song!!! :D
"Hungary, at home doesn't acknowledge the Treaty of Trianon. The education of the youth is done in the spirit of revenge. For such a small people, even the idea of revenge against the bigger powers is quite hilarious"
@MrFefefofo romanians in transylvania did not live in permanent large settlements, they lived in villages and easily defensible areas while the nobles lived in fortified settlements called cetate (from the latin civitas). you will never a find a list with names of romanian settlements, apart from those mentioned by third party sources like dabaca or biharia. in fact you won't find such a list even in wallachia or moldova until well after the renaissance era. it's a custom we inheritted....
@florinj87 (continued) it's a custom inherited from the dacians, who also did not write down the name of their settlements nor did they post signs like "buridava 20 kilometers that way" for defensive purposes. it's easier to repel and invader when he does not know where he is. same fro the romanian principalities.
the fact that settlement x has a romanian or hungarian influenced name only proves who was the ruler of the region, not who built it or who lived there.
@florinj87 and as you often see in history ruling population can be =/= local population.
what you will find however, and what you should look for, is material culture (pots, bowls, cemeteries, jewelry, etc). and that points out to a large christian community living north of danube since at least the 4th century ad. in case you are wondering the south slavs were christianized in the 8-9th centuries while those north slavs in the 11-12th centuries.
@florinj87 Ok, but how is it possible, that hundreds of settlements are on the balkan having romanian origin names from before the IX-X century, many on the so called Szörényi bánság or Wallachia later from the XI-XII century, and from Transilvania from after the XIV century. That clearly show how the romanains migrated from Dacia-Aurelianae to north, crossing the Danube, and got to even to Chekia in west, and Don river to east. Put the time of founding settlements in chronological order.
Wow, don't know that the Thracians and Illirians from Balkans have been Romanised?! The Jiricek line tells you something?
There is no evidence of a Vlach migration from South to North of the Danube. None! But there are plenty evidence that in North of the Danube lived a Romanised population!
@teo208 Yes this is the keypoint, and the homeland of the romanians. So called Dacia Aurelianae where most of the population were speaking latin. And this population founded settlements, called the hill, and rivers in latin.
These are the ancestor of the romanians.
There are evidence just you have to study the early serb, and hungarain documnets, aspeciall the tax reports.
In hungary there were inventory of tax paying villages end so on.... As in Serb the romanains were getting less end less
@teo208 their number was more and more in teh Szörényi bánság, in teh Bánát, in Maramaros, and Fogars, where the hungarain king settled them.
Every science in sinrgy proves this migration.
You can select one. not important wich one. for example Toponimia..
Or for example when were the churces built??? The balkan is full of originaly romanian ortodox churches, even in Thesalioniki there is one. where are the churches north from the Danumbe from this time?
@MrFefefofo The Hungarians really must be a pathetic nation, if they are so desperate as to prove the unprovable. You don't see this kind of stupidity between the Germans and French, one of them trying to prove that the other was not there. And if you prove that the Romanians were not in Transylvania what have you accoplished? You will ask UN to evacuate the Romanians from Transylvania where they are a majority since the first real census was made? You are funny!
@AlexanderSSI read my comments at this and at other films on youtube. I am interesting strictly in history and not on the argue of extremist both side. Nevertheless the France and Germany was fighting for centuries for Elzas and Lotharingia while Hungary have never fighted to Romania. If we prove the real history together, that is one step.
According to my position most of the romanians were invited to Hungary as others, comans, seaxons, vallons, italians, etc. They were wellcome.
@MrFefefofo And to continue, what are we to do with Hungary itself? A few centuries ago the majority of the population in Buda and Pest was German, the same is true with most of the Hungarian territory. A fact that you can even see today in the "Hungarian" names.
@AlexanderSSI If you study the history of hungary that is a good step to know about more the history of Romania.
Because the history of a country can not be studied without the interaction of the surraundings.
So, if you do so, then read what Gellért Bishop and Szent Istvan teached to his son Imre. This is very important point in the hungarian history to understand why the hungarians were wellcome to everybody who accepted the rule of the game, the power of the hungaian holly crown.
@AlexanderSSI if you understand this you will understand why hungary was open to many people to live hire.
First of all as Istvan stated. One lenguage country is poor countrz,many lenguage speking country is reach country.
He clearl saw 1000 years ago the advantage of a multicultural country. That"s all. that was the reason he invited germans, who could built stone walls, invited romanians who used the highhills for their sheepss. The hungarains for the big animals used the plain, no hills.etc
@florinj87 the basic problem is , if the romanains lived in huge number (5 sheepherds is not a nation) in Transilvania, or in the Charpatian basin then the archelogy should have found them . They were christians. If it is true, they had to have cemeteriew. No one has been excavated that has been accepted as romanain cemetery. But hundreds of slav, magyar, hun, gepida, goths, huns etc have been found. While in this period hundreds of romanian setlements were flowerin around Albania , on the balka
The basic problem is that your Hungarian propaganda tells you lies: they claim that black is white and white is black. The basic problem is that you get your info only from Hungarian propaganda books and sites, it seems. I told you that more than 700 daco-roman cemeteries and setlements bave been found until 1989, others were found later. We also have the objects with inscriptions which prove the existence of Latin speakers in Transylvania AFTER the withdrawal of the Roman legions.
@teo208 then here is a question - you can call this as hungarian propaganda.
Where is a latin text found after the withdrawal ????? ? you have found is kept to be daco-romanian but all other archeologist of the word keep it goth, avar, gepida, etc and not daco roman.
only on the Donarium is a short latin text, But this kind of donarium have been found in Norway also. It was certainly not made in Transilvania.
"The truth is not only can you not find "vlach artifacts" in Albania, but you won't even find an archaeological record of mass relocations in Moesia Inferior in 275. Furthermore, over 70% of the archaeological sites and cemetaries in Dacia show continuous habitation from 250-330. In other words, those sites were not evacuated by the Romans"
@teo208 hundreds of hundreds toponimes proves the present of romanians on the balkan. And the shortage of the toponimes in Transilvania is in sinergy with this. Before the X century the romanains were on the balkan, after crossed the Danube, and migrated to north. Put the romanian origin settlements in chronological order, and ou will see a nice migrtion upto Chekia, Polland, and east of Don!
This is not propaganda, but fact.
Please detail where did they disappear after 330????
Nu cred ca asediul Belgradului poate fi considerat o victorie romaneasca doar pentru ca Iancu de la Hunedoara a condus armata. Acolo s-au luptat ungurii si sarbii impotriva otomanilor, romanii nu au avut nicio legatura.
@ovinel Scria asa in niste deocumente/memorii italienesti contemporane cu Iancu. Am aflat despre ele din cartile lui Dogaru. O sa incerc sa aflu si sa-ti transmit numele/autorii.
Excelent filmul si ideea de a vorbi despre cateva dintre victoriilor romanilor. Trebuie mentionat si faptul ca romanii au dus tot timpul lupte drepte, de aparare, nu de cucerire. Adica am fost si viteji, dar si corecti.
Mai este un popor numeros, şi foarte drăguţi oamenii aceia... Chinezii. Şi ei tot la fel.
Parcă sunt fraţi cu noi. Nu au dus războaie de cucerire a altor neamuri, din contră pentru a scăpa de invazia hoardelor nomade, au construit şi au fortificat ZIDURILE Cetăţii lor, o parte din acestea rezistând şi astăzi.
@OmmTerra -Da, si chinezii sunt unul dintre popoarele pacifiste, probabil de aceea in perioada comunista Romania si China au avut relatii foarte bune intre ele si au fost in permanenta hartuite prin diferite metode de sovietici. Mesajul meu insa se referea doar la poporul roman, nu faceam comparatii cu altii.
La Dealul Spirii n-a fost chiar victorie, a fost o incercare disperata de a face ceva - foarte asemanator celor 300 de spartani de la Termopile, numai ca numarul real al pompierilor era de vreo 50 (!!!) Au murit toti si turcii au inaintat oricum dar hei... gestul conteaza.
@haiducs Putem totuşi considera că a fost o victorie din moment ce turcii au cerut încetarea focului cu promisiunea că-i vor lăsa în pace, promisiune pe care au încălcat-o.
but there were losses, too...a lot of them...
mailman63155 4 weeks ago
for foreigners:
Then comes battle for Marasti where our advance started.
In 1919 the Romano-Hungarian war and the conques of Budapest
In 1941 the retake of Bessarabia and Transnistria, in an alliance with Nazi Germany, against the soviet armies.
In 1944, when we turned against the germans, the retake of Northern Transylvania, all alone, against their best divisions, and the eliberation of Budapest with the Soviet armies. In 1945 the eliberation of Wien and Czechoslovakia.
MrILoveFirearms 1 month ago
Stephen The great ? era saxon sau cum ?substantivele proprii nu se traduc .
ionutzzexe 3 months ago
@ionutzzexe Ai mai auzit vreodata un roman sa spuna Megas Alexandros lui Alexandru cel Mare? Sau Ivan Groznyi lui Ivan cel Groaznic?
prunariu 2 months ago
ei*
razvan1928 10 months ago
foarte frumos clip continua sa mai faci:)
man0204 11 months ago
...Dar despre victoria de la Odessa(din vara anului 1941)?
emdiesel63 1 year ago
Nu vreau sa par tradator de neam si patrie dar informatia nu este prea corecta. Janos Hunyadi (Ioan de Hunedoara) nu era roman oricat de mult ar vrea unii. La rovine nu fost victorie, ca Mircea o pierdut tronu si calugareni a fost iar o batalie indecisa. e adevarat ca micile armate muntene au reusit sa reziste destul de bine superioritatii numerice a otomanilor dar nu au obtinut o victorie.
fiintaumana 1 year ago
@fiintaumana Nu pari tradator,pari doar prost informat.Sau,in fine,ce visezi tu noaptea,le dai ziua ca fapte sigure.Mai citeste,mai mediteaza,si apoi intoarce-te sa ne iluminezi cu adevarurile tale absolute.
MrCraiessou 1 year ago
@MrCraiessou Inseaman ca parti bune din istoria neamului roman sunt defapt rezultatul viselor mele.credeam ca intradevar a existat un Vlad Uzurpatorul pe tronul Tarii Romanesti, dar este imposibil deoarece Mircea a invins. De asemenea vicoria lui Mihai la Calugareni trebuie sa fi fost atat de mare incat Imperiul Otoman a platit Tarii Romane tribut pentru urmatoarele 2 secole. Iar Ioan/Iancu de Hunedoara a fost un atat de bun ortodox si vorbitor de lb. romana incat a umplut Ardealul de manastiri
fiintaumana 1 year ago
@fiintaumana Si ce importanta au aceste episoade marunte care nu au schimbat cu nimic sensul istoriei noastre,acela de a exista ca popor cu propria limba,credinta,organizare politica,chiar daca a trebuit sa platim 'Taxa de protectie"unor natiuni mafiote.Stramosii nostri au luptat si cu arma si cu creierul pentru tara lor si atata timp cat nu vorbesti turceste,maghiara,slava,eu zic ca lupta lor a fost destul de victorioasa.Iancu avea sange romanesc dar conditiile din Ardeal au fost mai complexe.
MrCraiessou 1 year ago
@MrCraiessou Tocmai, avem o istorie foarte interesanta, care ne deosebeste de toti vecinii, aven eroi si momente de glorie si nu trebuie sa exageram unele evenimente pentru a avea motive de mandrie.Cat despre Avram Iancu, el este unul dintre personajele din istoria noatra caruia nu i se poate reprosa nimic, un adevarat erou al Europei, nu doar al Romaniei si nu un sovin cum l-ar vrea unii care tot fac marsuri si manifestatii si fac referiri la el chiar daca nu il inteleg.
fiintaumana 1 year ago
@fiintaumana Nu stiu despre nici un mars sau manifestatie avandu-l ca tema pe Iancu de Hunedoara.Poate te referi la Avram Iancu,ca simbol al luptei nationale a romanilor din Transilvania.Oricum,nu sunt manifestatii sovine,a te opune strainului care doreste sa te conduca in propria ta tara nu e sovinism.
MrCraiessou 1 year ago
In the battle of Vaslui polish, magyar and sekler forces supported the romanians too.
MrFefefofo 1 year ago
@MrFefefofo you are partially correct. the polish king promised but to send soldiers but in the end he did not send any. that caused him a great deal of problems at home after the victory.
hungary only sent a few hundred mercenaries, and that was only so that the king would save face with the pope not because he actually wanted to help the country he later intended to conquer. the only real outside aid that stefan had was from the sekely volunteers who numbered somewhere in the low thousands.
adijarca 1 year ago
@adijarca As I know from romanians that ca 4000 seclers 2000 polishes and ca 1000 hungarains supported Stephan. But these forces were "professionals, and not farmers with "kasza"
Hungary never wanted to conquer Moldva, becasue this pricipality was made by the assistace of the hungarains. And was tributary of the Hungarain Kingdom.
As Stephan was also. 3 days after the battle of Moldvabánya, he was in front of Mátyás and made fealty. He was realpolitician and sow that together is easier than
MrFefefofo 1 year ago
@MrFefefofo You seem to enjoy so much your paranoid onanist dreams about your alleged supremacy !.Romanians Principalities always rejected treaties with Magyars and fought back your stupid incursions.Transylvania is the only Romanian land you succeeded to implant for a short while your 'Assistance"But Turkey took care of you and pulverised Hungary.You became a turkish province,while Romanian Principalities remained Independent kingdoms just under vassality treaties with Turkey.
MrCraiessou 1 year ago
@MrCraiessou Principalities as Kindgdom? Ehh. Even you do not know the form of Moldva, and Wallachia? The romanains arrived to Avas, because the hungarains invited them, to live in hungary and their function was to save the north east boarder. That was the reason they did not pay tax there similar to the saxons and seclers. Some time after they settled in MAramaros many of the INCLUDING hungarain groups were sent to Bukovina with the same task.
MrFefefofo 1 year ago
@MrCraiessou Turkey really did not occupy Moldva, but the tax was so huge for centuries that the romanians and serbs were the purest people in europe 150 years ago.
that time 98% of the romanains were analfabet, but in Hungary 200 years ago there were even gymnasiums for they. Not speaking about the Bible that was translated for the romanains on hungarain cost. What are you speaking about?
MrFefefofo 1 year ago
@MrCraiessou During the ottomans Hungary still had many castles that was under hungaraian hands, and Hungary did not pay any tax for the ottomans. As the romanains did for century.
Until the XV century the Moldavian Principality was a hungarain tributary. As Stephan cel Mare aslo. Who had some castle in Transilvania for his great service against the ottomans. similar to Vlad Tepes.
MrFefefofo 1 year ago
@MrFefefofo The only great powers in that time were Turcs and Poles,Hungarians were very small and insignificant.Magyars betrayed their old religion and became Catholic and Poles vassals.Stephen had to worry about the Lechia(Poland) and Sultan.He deliberately chose at the end the Turkish power,in exchange for independence and preserving the religion.Turcs were never allowed to settle or make mosquees in Romanian land,we only paid them out with money.Then Austria and Russia rised,never Hungary
MrCraiessou 1 year ago
@MrCraiessou what period are you talking about? After 1526-1541 or before.
Until 1490 the hungarian army was the greates army in europe. It was professional army.
And if the Poles were so big power, why the hugnarians frequently went to help them?
Even after 1700????
The turks had to be not present in Romanains beacuase the romanains payed the tax as a good student. The turks were present where they needed the military forces to collect the taxes. As in Hungary.
MrFefefofo 1 year ago
@MrCraiessou if Hu. had payed the tax, the ottomans would have not been present.
they needed the forces to collect the tax.
And do not forget. Until the russians pushed out the ottomans, Romanians was a kind of slave. Do you know who were the janicsar in the Rumelian army????
MrFefefofo 1 year ago
@MrFefefofo You are delusional,my friend,like all Hungarians.You were mercenaries,the west powers employed you for a while as cannon flesh slaves.But you were so bad as tacticians so they took hands off you and let you easy pray for turcs.Don't fool yourself,Romanians are a very old,very strong and wise nation,we stay in our land not only by comfronting big bullies in a suicidal manner but also by diplomacy.Hungary is a small weak country with megalomanic dreams,you need a psychiatric cure.
MrCraiessou 1 year ago
@MrCraiessou If somebody is under a certain level, like you are now, usually I do not answare. Offending the other nations seems to be a new natioal sport - near the old one - of the romanains. If they are out of argue they start to do that. Please try to stay to be gentlamen.
The ethnogenesis or the romanias started some hundred years ago, and finished ca 200 years ago. The romanians were trashuming sheepherds on the balkan, that is the reason there is so few documents about them in teh past.
MrFefefofo 1 year ago
@MrCraiessou we had no any problem with the russian until 1849. If they had not came here to help the habsburgs, Hungary would be today the Hungarian kindom, the paradise of all people living under the hungarian crown.
From that time the russian are not honest in the eyes of the hungarians.
Look after the story of Arad....you know then why.
MrFefefofo 1 year ago
@MrFefefofo The "schools" you had were nothing but Catholic missionarism Propaganda.Magyars never had a strong original spiritual life,they were an easy pray for Catholic and Protestant missionarism.While our rural culture was/is the strongest and oldest in Europe,our peasants were trained in folk music,poems,wood and costume art - we did not sold our arhaic Romanian identity like you did.Magyar barbarians burnt down on cannon balls 300 Romanian monasteries as cultural centres in Transylvania.
MrCraiessou 1 year ago
@MrCraiessou Ok dear , list here some romanian churches that was burnded by the hugarains. Be streight man and after standing something certainly you can list here some of the monostries what the hugnarians burned.
Dear The hungarians were not so stupid to burn that was in their country.
But list here please some.
Do you think about Gyulafehérvár, that was burned by Vlad Tepes in cooperation by the ottomans?
MrFefefofo 1 year ago
@MrFefefofo I was not insulting you,I was giving you a diagnostic,dear friend.You HUngarians worry me a lot.You seem rather normal but your only hobby is to enter Romanian videos or post your own clips with greatest historical aberrations, a display of a confusional state of mind.There is nothing nomadic about us,love,we are the oldest and the most sedentaric nation in the area.We have a very old history in the Danubian-Carpathian basin and all you say about us is sheer mentaly ill propaganda.
MrCraiessou 1 year ago
@MrCraiessou Let my doctor to give diagnostic about me, please, OK? Until I do not give about you. I am chating to some romanains here, and who I can convince to read some scientic publication about the history of transilvania based on arheology, toponimy, historical documents, they are not so sure about the daco-romanian continutity dear, aspecially about the place of it, that is Transilvania.
MrFefefofo 1 year ago
@MrFefefofo Yeah,sure,now it's late in the evening,it's time for your bedtime stories!Of course you are not told in your history books what kind of bastards you were towards the people you occupied.Your so-called Crown was not 'Heaven" was HELL for all Romanians and Slavs robbed by you.Is difficult for you to accept that you are a desperate savage tribe from arid steppes,pillaging and robbing your way through central Europe.Difficult to accept that even Pannonia is not yours,is an occupied land.
MrCraiessou 1 year ago
@MrCraiessou All land on the globe is occupied land. All. The hungarians were so bastard to the romanians that hungarain man made the first bible for the romanians.
In 1800 gymnasyums were for the romanains in Hungary while in the "free" Moldva, and oltenia 98% of the pople were analfabet that time. The first romanains lenguage book was printed in Budapest. The most famous romanian inventor learned in the same university in Budapest where I did.
MrFefefofo 1 year ago
@MrCraiessou Don't you have problem with Spain dear? What a special right do the romanians have in spain today? There are ca 2 million strawberry pickers. I do not know any romanian lnguage gymnasium for them.. The romanains arrived to hungary becasue the wished better life then in the Balkan or in Wallachia and Moldva. thei migration is still going on from the IX century. Romanian origin villages appeared east from the Don and in the chaucasus. That is not ancient dacian land is it?
MrFefefofo 1 year ago
@MrFefefofo Give me a break with your religious propaganda books!Moldova and Oltenia has Unesco World Heritage medieval monasteries with incredible painting and arhitecture beauty.You savages destroyed Romanian art and culture in Transylvania,banned Romanians to enter cities and build in stone(so,the wood wonders of Maramures and Apuseni appeared)try to magyarised and brainwashed Romanians via your stupid schools.Music and art and literature flourished in free Romania,not in your savage Crown
MrCraiessou 1 year ago
@MrCraiessou Read the book I sent you on you page. You will not dream anymore about the daco-romanian continuity anymore, that is sure. Read the fact, Read the historical facts, and do not believe for some dream of many romanian historiant that stand a false theory that they never can prove.
The archeology is one of the keypoint here , dear. Tha archeology could not present until today one settlement in Transilvania, where romanains lived between the VIII-XII century. They lived on the balkan .
MrFefefofo 1 year ago
@MrFefefofo Only the King of Idiots could believe that fertile great Dacia remained empty to wait for Uralian-Uyguryan mongrels,while little arid Albania or something hatched two nations,the 4 millions Albanians nation and the great 28 millions DacoRomanian living NorthDanube in their Dacia-Romania.Desperate people,Hungarians!Transylvania is full of Dacian,DacoRomanian and Romanian settlements.Read hundreds of volumes written by great Romanian historians from all times, or just shut up!
MrCraiessou 1 year ago
@MrCraiessou read the book that I gave you. you will find the answeres.
28,000,000 today. even in the Chaucasus, and east from Don. Many in Ukraina, where the dacians were romanised too....:-)))))
MrFefefofo 1 year ago
@MrFefefofo We have no problem with Spain.Romanians go to West to earn extramoney,very few want to build a life there.They work as seasonal workers and send money home to their children/ family.Even if they like to settle there,they are very able and willing to learn the language and the customs of their new country.The 28 millions Romanians live in RO and Rep.Moldova and in region near border(East Tizsa-Hungary,NorthBukovina Ukraine and TimocSerbia)It's a round and compact historical territory
MrCraiessou 1 year ago
@MrCraiessou @MrFefefofo Look . I talked to romanains , and I did not find any who want to go home...They were from Buchurest,, from Temesvár. etc. Ask them first. When they will go back? If the money will be more at home. That never will be more.
The pareants die and the grandchildren borning in Spain will never go back to Romanian. As from the US 1% went back.
MrFefefofo 1 year ago
@MrCraiessou they migrated there from South of SAVA-Danube river as KAkamenous stated, to the northe. The first groups arrived to MAramaros,and Fogaras, and from maramaros they went to Bukovina as the Hungarian king ordered, and settled there. Their function was simple. Saving the border ot the hungarian kingdom. As that was in the Szörényi Bánság too.
Not the romanians arrived to hungary that time only. Italians, germans, saxons, komans, besenyős, etc etc
MrFefefofo 1 year ago
@MrFefefofo :D:D:D Again i catch you lying! Kekemenous mentions the migration was from NORTH to SOUTH! Is there any point of lying?? All the people can check and see the truth so what's the point?? Remember:
"The Vlachs were conquered by Emperor Trajan who had defeated and annihilated them.Their king, named Decebal, was killed."
Remember these words?? It's our old friend Kekemenous! Aaaa sory it was actualy Decebalus the "Hungarian king" like Naddeo says ahahahahahahahahahhahahahahah
gogoasacenusie 1 year ago
@gogoasacenusie Read Kakamenous carefully.
Migration from north to south. This case the north means south of SAVA-DANUBE !!!!!!!!!
Capisci dear gogo?
Where did Naddeo mention Decebal? I did not hear that.
MrFefefofo 1 year ago
@MrFefefofo , Kekemenous says that the Vlachs are Dacians and Bessi who fleed because of the Romans and enstablished in the inhospitable places where Serbs live! Read Naddeo's website my dear friend ahahaha you're hungarian and you dindn't even read his website ahahaha. He says that Decebalus was a "Hungarian king". And BTW i'm Barack Obama !! :D:D:D
gogoasacenusie 1 year ago
And how many lived in the XI centyury? No one. All settlement was founded leater on the area....
MrFefefofo 1 year ago
@MrFefefofo Big mistake,my Fefefofo fluffy friend.! TRansylvania is HOME for any Romanian,Transylvania is ROMANIA.The 5 % Hungarian-speaking population (Magyars,Szeklers and HUngarian GYpsies) are free to go in their National state HUngary.If you don't like Romania have a nice trip to the countries of your dreams!
MrCraiessou 1 year ago
@MrCraiessou , or return to Kazakhstan at the Madjari people, their genetical relatives.
gogoasacenusie 1 year ago
@MrFefefofo
In the 11th century Transylvania was inhabited in majority by Romanians. The oldest Hungarian chronicle, "Gesta Hungarorum" written by Anonymus, mentions that Hungarians conquered this land from Romanians. Simon de Keza, another Hungarian, says the same. When did Simon de Keza (a Hungarian) write that Romanians were an ancient people who lived in Transylvania long before Hungarians? At the time when your today historians claim that the Vlahs migrated in Transylvania!
teo208 6 months ago
So Simon de Keza must have been an eye witness of the Vlach "migration from Balkans to Transylvania" and yet he writes that those Vlachs inhabited Transylvania long before Hungarians came... How come?! Explain that to me!
teo208 6 months ago
At least 200 or even 300 settlements from 4th century AD to 7th century AD have been found in the territory of Roman Dacia which prove the continuity of the daco-roman population after 274 AD. In the territory of the "free Dacians" cca 800 Dacian settlements have been found! For 3rd-5th centuries AD: 140 settlements and cemeteries in Moldova, 134 in Wallachia, 66 in Transylvania. For 6th-7th centuries AD: 227 in Moldova, 52 in Wallachia, 91 in Transylvania => over 700 settlements and cemeteries!
teo208 6 months ago
@teo208 focus ont he IX-XI periode. I do not care any settlements at the V. century. Aspecially no one are proven to be romanains in transilvania even from the age. But let's focus on IX-XI ok?
Let'S go !!! I ask only 5. But call these five on its name on that time!!!!!
Show the mortal remain of one !!!! only one romanians from that time !!!!
MrFefefofo 6 months ago
Comment removed
teo208 6 months ago
@teo208 when was it written? 500 years after the event. What sources did it use?
MrFefefofo 6 months ago
All these settlements and cemeteries I talked about are daco-roman settlements and cemeteries, I didn't include the settlements and cemeteries of the migratory tribes among them.
teo208 6 months ago
@teo208 Anonimus this case was not right, his fantasy created historicala pesrsons like Gelou or others based on settlement names. Exactly how he originated the name of the hungarians from Ungvár town, In his time the comans were also arrived and he did not know when so he thought the comans were also here together with the wlachs. He was not accurate man. Read him carefully.
MrFefefofo 5 months ago
@MrFefefofo Some important Romanian monasteries burned down and destroyed in Transylvania in 1761-1762:Prislop<Plosca,Bucium,Sambata de sus,Voievodeni,Ramet,Afteia,Sanmartinu de Campie,Lapus,Lainici,Cartisoara,Rohhita,BunaVestire,Dejani,Berivoienii Mari and all village churches in their area.The process started with the Orthodox Cathedral of Alba Iulia,burned down in 1716.On net you can find a complete list of all 288 Romanian monasteries and village churches destroyed in Transylvania.
MrCraiessou 1 year ago
@MrFefefofo
If you read books - other than magyar propaganda bullshit - you would know that:
1. Dacian tribes lived also east of Dniester (ruins of ancient dacian "dave" have been found east of Dniester.
2. In the 16th - 17th centuries and in the 18th - 19th centuries many Romanians left Moldova for Ukraine and north of Black See respectivly because of Ottoman rule etc.
3. There were several mass deportation of Romanians from Bessarabia to Siberia.
teo208 6 months ago
@MrCraiessou Do you mean the one of the oldest education center of europe in Nagyenyed, what was burned byt the romanains including one of the oldest bibliotec of europe? The romanains did on the fromt with Axente Sever who was well educated in hungarain schools what to put on fire.
Of course first the historical books.
shall I continue?
But waiting for the list.
MrFefefofo 1 year ago
@MrFefefofo The most important was the Orthodox Cathedral of AlbaIulia,burnt down in 1714,the spiritual center of Romanians.Then RO.priests were tortured to give up their faith.Because Romanians heroically resisted gen. vonBukow ordered the Magyar regiments in Transylvania to burn down(the ones in wood) or destroy with cannon balls(The one in stones)ALL Orthodox Romanian churches in TR.,Magyars were so happy with this savagery that they destroyed even Oltenian churches near border(f.ex Lainici)
MrCraiessou 1 year ago
@MrCraiessou in 1711 hungary lost the "Rákóczy freedom war against the habsburgs, 95% of the castles were exploded by the habsburgs after it, there were not hungarain military forces that time. I do not know what you are speaking about.
I was expected a list of the settlements where the hungarians burned one ortodox church, but you say all. The answare is not accepted , sorry.
Vlad Tepes, really burned the churches in Alba Iulia.
MrFefefofo 1 year ago
@MrFefefofo
This is a Hungarian myth. You don't have historical books which confirm your fake history that's why you invented this myth.
teo208 6 months ago
@MrFefefofo and they didnt do shit bro...they were pretty insignificant in numbers
Starbob66 1 year ago
@Starbob66 That forces were professional forces, not farmers,
That is an other question that the fog made the ottomans crazy, because thez did not see anything.
MrFefefofo 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrFefefofo "In the battle of Vaslui polish, magyar and sekler forces supported the romanians too.
" Lies Lies Lies and more Lies from our friend MrFefefofo the hungarian irredentist who follows romanian videos like a dog without a master...
unomnacajit11 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrFefefofo "In the battle of Vaslui polish, magyar and sekler forces supported the romanians too.
" Lies Lies Lies and more Lies from our friend MrFefefofo, the hungarian irredentist who follows romanian videos like a dog without a master...
unomnacajit11 1 year ago
@MrFefefofo in the Batlle of Vaslui were 45.000 romanians 3.000 hungarians and 1.000 polish. That is support??? Romanians won that battle alone !
razvan1928 11 months ago
@razvan1928 HA,HA!!!BRAVO RAZVANE TATA!!! ALA MAI AVEA PUTIN SI ZICEA CA AU CASTIGAT BATALIA UNGURII,NU ROMANII...
marius13037 10 months ago
@marius13037 pai asa e frate , numai cu vrajeli umbla jigodiile d unguri k cik eu ne'au ajutat, Mandru ca sunt roman!
razvan1928 10 months ago
@MrFefefofo true... but they were few compared to the size of the Moldavian army lead by Stefan the Great
romaniadodoloata 5 months ago
@romaniadodoloata read please my comments before. these "small" goups were proffessionals
MrFefefofo 5 months ago
@MrFefefofo , haha you are really persistent Mr Fefe :D Unfortunately for you Gelu did exist and as a direct archeological confirmation is its fortress from Dabaca. Moreover Anonymus is worldwide accepted even by many Hungarian historians. Anonymus didn't have any logical reason to lie and describe in so much DETAIL the entire conquest of Transylvania. Nestor confirms him saying how Magyars from East came and battled with Vlachs and Slavs inhabiting these lands. Oupsie.
gogoasacenusie 4 months ago
@gogoasacenusie Gyalu as settlement name was exist in the time of anonimus, and he gave from thiis name Gelou.
Around Doboca nothing have been found proving that there were a man called Gelou. For Example in Zalavár cirill texts have been vound proving that Cirrill or Method was there !!!
Anonimus did not want to lie. But he had to write the story, that time gesta, to sy. and he used his fantasy based on what he could se around hungary. Hungarians fighted the comans too. ??????? is it true? no
MrFefefofo 4 months ago
@MrFefefofo , and by the way, remember Posada battle where Hungarian king escaped from Romanians dressed as a woman? :))) The most embarrassing moment in the history of Europe :D
Sry again Mr Fefe. Back to library and learn history.
gogoasacenusie 4 months ago
@MrFefefofo , and let's see some images from the Dabaca fortress:
romguide(.)ro/code/galleriffic.php?table=touristic_sites_images&id=2298&column=id_touristic_site&title=Cetatea+Dabaca
What?? What?? I can't hear you Mr Fefe, can you please be louder, because the sheeps cover your voice my dear cioban friend :-)
gogoasacenusie 4 months ago
@gogoasacenusie Perhaps near the Danube, where one hungarain army fighted to the Bolgars. But not in Transilvania.
And nit in the charoatian basin.
MrFefefofo 4 months ago
@MrFefefofo , delight yourself with this Mr Fefe:
".......Between the 10th and 14th centuries new political formations emerged in the Carpathian-Danube region. The Hungarians, who had settled in Pannonia at the end of the 9th century and who entered Dacia in the 10th century, overwhelmed the Slavic-Romanian duchies, or voivodates, that they encountered there."
Britannica Enciclopedy
britannica(.)com/EBchecked/topic/508461/Romania/42864/Romanians-and-Hungarians
Learn history Mr Fefe
gogoasacenusie 4 months ago
@gogoasacenusie First of all look after how the Britannica Enciclopedy has been maintained. It is written by the national academies, so this is not new for the hungarian what the romanains wrote there. This book is not th eplace of historical argues.
in the X century there were no wlach in Tranxilvania. this can be proven for example by the toponimes.
the first romanian name of a village appears in the VIX century in document. All other have nor romanian origin.
MrFefefofo 4 months ago
@MrFefefofo , sorry Mr Fefe. You have no arguments, no nothing....you do have persistence which is though, a quality.
gogoasacenusie 4 months ago
@gogoasacenusie I told you, The chapter was written by romanains.
One year was not enough for you to list some settlements where tyou can prove romanains lived in 900 in Transilvania. Is is so hard? just for you. The romanian archeologists excavated ca 1 year ago again a huge cementery near Gyuéafehérvár... Clearly proven than the battle between István and Gyula had happened, The cemeterz is from ca 1000 and the people died in battel. This is sg what is true !!!! where are the romanains?
MrFefefofo 4 months ago
@MrFefefofo , yeah Mr Fefe! The Romanian propaganda machine paid Britannica Enciclopedy and the entire planet to write this "version" of history! Hahah Listen to Abba - The winner takes it all very nice song!!! :D
"Hungary, at home doesn't acknowledge the Treaty of Trianon. The education of the youth is done in the spirit of revenge. For such a small people, even the idea of revenge against the bigger powers is quite hilarious"
Fenyes Samu 1935
Listen to him! He was wise emulate his attitude!
gogoasacenusie 4 months ago
@MrFefefofo , yeah Mr Fefe! The Romanian propaganda machine paid Britannica Enciclopedy and the entire planet to write this "version" of history! Hahah Listen to Abba - The winner takes it all very nice song!!! :D
"Hungary, at home doesn't acknowledge the Treaty of Trianon. The education of the youth is done in the spirit of revenge. For such a small people, even the idea of revenge against the bigger powers is quite hilarious"
Fenyes Samu 1935
Listen to him! He was wise emulate his attitude!
gogoasacenusie 4 months ago
@MrFefefofo romanians in transylvania did not live in permanent large settlements, they lived in villages and easily defensible areas while the nobles lived in fortified settlements called cetate (from the latin civitas). you will never a find a list with names of romanian settlements, apart from those mentioned by third party sources like dabaca or biharia. in fact you won't find such a list even in wallachia or moldova until well after the renaissance era. it's a custom we inheritted....
florinj87 4 months ago
@florinj87 (continued) it's a custom inherited from the dacians, who also did not write down the name of their settlements nor did they post signs like "buridava 20 kilometers that way" for defensive purposes. it's easier to repel and invader when he does not know where he is. same fro the romanian principalities.
the fact that settlement x has a romanian or hungarian influenced name only proves who was the ruler of the region, not who built it or who lived there.
florinj87 4 months ago
@florinj87 and as you often see in history ruling population can be =/= local population.
what you will find however, and what you should look for, is material culture (pots, bowls, cemeteries, jewelry, etc). and that points out to a large christian community living north of danube since at least the 4th century ad. in case you are wondering the south slavs were christianized in the 8-9th centuries while those north slavs in the 11-12th centuries.
florinj87 4 months ago
@florinj87 Ok, but how is it possible, that hundreds of settlements are on the balkan having romanian origin names from before the IX-X century, many on the so called Szörényi bánság or Wallachia later from the XI-XII century, and from Transilvania from after the XIV century. That clearly show how the romanains migrated from Dacia-Aurelianae to north, crossing the Danube, and got to even to Chekia in west, and Don river to east. Put the time of founding settlements in chronological order.
MrFefefofo 4 months ago
@MrFefefofo
Wow, don't know that the Thracians and Illirians from Balkans have been Romanised?! The Jiricek line tells you something?
There is no evidence of a Vlach migration from South to North of the Danube. None! But there are plenty evidence that in North of the Danube lived a Romanised population!
teo208 3 months ago
@teo208 Yes this is the keypoint, and the homeland of the romanians. So called Dacia Aurelianae where most of the population were speaking latin. And this population founded settlements, called the hill, and rivers in latin.
These are the ancestor of the romanians.
There are evidence just you have to study the early serb, and hungarain documnets, aspeciall the tax reports.
In hungary there were inventory of tax paying villages end so on.... As in Serb the romanains were getting less end less
MrFefefofo 3 months ago
@teo208 their number was more and more in teh Szörényi bánság, in teh Bánát, in Maramaros, and Fogars, where the hungarain king settled them.
Every science in sinrgy proves this migration.
You can select one. not important wich one. for example Toponimia..
Or for example when were the churces built??? The balkan is full of originaly romanian ortodox churches, even in Thesalioniki there is one. where are the churches north from the Danumbe from this time?
MrFefefofo 3 months ago
@MrFefefofo The Hungarians really must be a pathetic nation, if they are so desperate as to prove the unprovable. You don't see this kind of stupidity between the Germans and French, one of them trying to prove that the other was not there. And if you prove that the Romanians were not in Transylvania what have you accoplished? You will ask UN to evacuate the Romanians from Transylvania where they are a majority since the first real census was made? You are funny!
Watch this: /watch?v=2ktYFXykoTk
AlexanderSSI 3 months ago
@AlexanderSSI read my comments at this and at other films on youtube. I am interesting strictly in history and not on the argue of extremist both side. Nevertheless the France and Germany was fighting for centuries for Elzas and Lotharingia while Hungary have never fighted to Romania. If we prove the real history together, that is one step.
According to my position most of the romanians were invited to Hungary as others, comans, seaxons, vallons, italians, etc. They were wellcome.
MrFefefofo 3 months ago
@MrFefefofo And to continue, what are we to do with Hungary itself? A few centuries ago the majority of the population in Buda and Pest was German, the same is true with most of the Hungarian territory. A fact that you can even see today in the "Hungarian" names.
So please, don't start it, you won't even win!
AlexanderSSI 3 months ago
@AlexanderSSI If you study the history of hungary that is a good step to know about more the history of Romania.
Because the history of a country can not be studied without the interaction of the surraundings.
So, if you do so, then read what Gellért Bishop and Szent Istvan teached to his son Imre. This is very important point in the hungarian history to understand why the hungarians were wellcome to everybody who accepted the rule of the game, the power of the hungaian holly crown.
MrFefefofo 3 months ago
@AlexanderSSI if you understand this you will understand why hungary was open to many people to live hire.
First of all as Istvan stated. One lenguage country is poor countrz,many lenguage speking country is reach country.
He clearl saw 1000 years ago the advantage of a multicultural country. That"s all. that was the reason he invited germans, who could built stone walls, invited romanians who used the highhills for their sheepss. The hungarains for the big animals used the plain, no hills.etc
MrFefefofo 3 months ago
@MrFefefofo And we Romanians will help you evacuate the Spaniards from Spain, because they are now celebrating Transhumance. Just as the Romanians!
5,000 sheep fill Madrid's streets
/watch?v=RCo12vSPcKs
AlexanderSSI 3 months ago
@florinj87 the basic problem is , if the romanains lived in huge number (5 sheepherds is not a nation) in Transilvania, or in the Charpatian basin then the archelogy should have found them . They were christians. If it is true, they had to have cemeteriew. No one has been excavated that has been accepted as romanain cemetery. But hundreds of slav, magyar, hun, gepida, goths, huns etc have been found. While in this period hundreds of romanian setlements were flowerin around Albania , on the balka
MrFefefofo 4 months ago
@MrFefefofo
The basic problem is that your Hungarian propaganda tells you lies: they claim that black is white and white is black. The basic problem is that you get your info only from Hungarian propaganda books and sites, it seems. I told you that more than 700 daco-roman cemeteries and setlements bave been found until 1989, others were found later. We also have the objects with inscriptions which prove the existence of Latin speakers in Transylvania AFTER the withdrawal of the Roman legions.
teo208 3 months ago
@teo208 then here is a question - you can call this as hungarian propaganda.
Where is a latin text found after the withdrawal ????? ? you have found is kept to be daco-romanian but all other archeologist of the word keep it goth, avar, gepida, etc and not daco roman.
only on the Donarium is a short latin text, But this kind of donarium have been found in Norway also. It was certainly not made in Transilvania.
MrFefefofo 3 months ago
@MrFefefofo
"The truth is not only can you not find "vlach artifacts" in Albania, but you won't even find an archaeological record of mass relocations in Moesia Inferior in 275. Furthermore, over 70% of the archaeological sites and cemetaries in Dacia show continuous habitation from 250-330. In other words, those sites were not evacuated by the Romans"
teo208 3 months ago
@teo208 hundreds of hundreds toponimes proves the present of romanians on the balkan. And the shortage of the toponimes in Transilvania is in sinergy with this. Before the X century the romanains were on the balkan, after crossed the Danube, and migrated to north. Put the romanian origin settlements in chronological order, and ou will see a nice migrtion upto Chekia, Polland, and east of Don!
This is not propaganda, but fact.
Please detail where did they disappear after 330????
MrFefefofo 3 months ago
well at shelimbar the Romanian country was united only with transilvania not with moldova, some months later were united with moldova
fromromaniawitlov 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hey romanian assholes,i can see you're out of any ideas for a good story.This video is quite boring and shit quality too.:))))
tobeamanmyson23 1 year ago
Nu cred ca asediul Belgradului poate fi considerat o victorie romaneasca doar pentru ca Iancu de la Hunedoara a condus armata. Acolo s-au luptat ungurii si sarbii impotriva otomanilor, romanii nu au avut nicio legatura.
Oricum, felicitari pentru video.
ovinel 1 year ago
@ovinel asa zisa armata ungureasca era compusa in majoritate de vlahi...
AlexTD86 1 year ago
@AlexTD86 E interesant ce zici, ai putea sa-mi dai o sursa care sa confirme ce spui tu?
ovinel 1 year ago
@ovinel Scria asa in niste deocumente/memorii italienesti contemporane cu Iancu. Am aflat despre ele din cartile lui Dogaru. O sa incerc sa aflu si sa-ti transmit numele/autorii.
AlexTD86 1 year ago
Excelent filmul si ideea de a vorbi despre cateva dintre victoriilor romanilor. Trebuie mentionat si faptul ca romanii au dus tot timpul lupte drepte, de aparare, nu de cucerire. Adica am fost si viteji, dar si corecti.
AndradaDaciana 1 year ago
@AndradaDaciana,
Mai este un popor numeros, şi foarte drăguţi oamenii aceia... Chinezii. Şi ei tot la fel.
Parcă sunt fraţi cu noi. Nu au dus războaie de cucerire a altor neamuri, din contră pentru a scăpa de invazia hoardelor nomade, au construit şi au fortificat ZIDURILE Cetăţii lor, o parte din acestea rezistând şi astăzi.
Toate cele Bune.
OmmTerra
OmmTerra 1 year ago
@OmmTerra -Da, si chinezii sunt unul dintre popoarele pacifiste, probabil de aceea in perioada comunista Romania si China au avut relatii foarte bune intre ele si au fost in permanenta hartuite prin diferite metode de sovietici. Mesajul meu insa se referea doar la poporul roman, nu faceam comparatii cu altii.
AndradaDaciana 1 year ago
@AndradaDaciana,
Ştiu... am îţeles ceea ce aţi scris. Dar am dorit să spun şi despre frăţiorii noştri mai mici dar numeroşi. Mie aşa îmi place să le zic chinezilor.
OmmTerra 1 year ago 4
La 1:39 incepe ,,Traiasca Regele" (Primul imn al romaniei 1884-1948)
foculrosu 1 year ago
Alexander felicitari alt film de nota 10.Din pacate am ramas acum fara idei fiindca vroiam sa fac ceva asemanator dar nu conteaza:)) 5*
RouBear1 1 year ago
Excelent ! Astept si urmatorul !
HTQCOMANDO 1 year ago
La Dealul Spirii n-a fost chiar victorie, a fost o incercare disperata de a face ceva - foarte asemanator celor 300 de spartani de la Termopile, numai ca numarul real al pompierilor era de vreo 50 (!!!) Au murit toti si turcii au inaintat oricum dar hei... gestul conteaza.
haiducs 1 year ago
@haiducs Putem totuşi considera că a fost o victorie din moment ce turcii au cerut încetarea focului cu promisiunea că-i vor lăsa în pace, promisiune pe care au încălcat-o.
AlexanderSSI 1 year ago
Felicitari!!. ...Nu te opri!!
siegfried882012 1 year ago
Doamne ajuta, Alexandru !
Braduta3 1 year ago
Excelenta treaba... La tot mai multe videouri d-astea.
nicubucurestiromania 1 year ago
Excelent video !!...felicitari Alexandru!
;)
judokadinu 1 year ago
Comment removed
OmmTerra 1 year ago 6